i have 2 routers 2811 interconnected together ,1 of these router running in circuit with 2 Mbps over Internet the 2nd one use MPLS Circuit with a bandwidth of 4Mbps,how configure the routing to route over the MPLS while IPSec act as standby
View 1 RepliesTo check if this is enough to built point-point MPLS between 2811 abd 3745Maybe some other technology should to be used for point-to-point connection?Basically, there should be transparent connection between routers.Also, it's possible to use ISP routers as MPLS endpoints for MPLS, so seems just etherenet connection required
View 7 Replies View RelatedWe have about 200 spokes (2811 routers), each one connected to two hubs(7206VXR with NPE-G2) via a separate DMVPN. DMVPN is over MPLS cloud provided by the local operator. On the hubs we get very frequently these type of messages
.Feb 9 16:00:10.402: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 200: Neighbor 10.X.X.X (Tunnel3) is down: Interface Goodbye received.Feb 9 16:00:11.658: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 200: Neighbor 10.X.X.X (Tunnel3) is up: new adjacency
On the spoke
Feb 9 13:36:48: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 200: Neighbor 10.X.X.X (Tunnel0) is down: holding time expiredFeb 9 13:36:51: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 200: Neighbor 10.X.X.X (Tunnel0) is up: new adjacency
I think the default eigrp hello and holding timers (5,15) are not suitable since these are wan links.
I have this topology: ( I use OSPF instead of EIGRP for routing between PE CE. The customer vrf name is cusA, they have 4 sites: CE from site 3 have 2 links to 2 PE ( one for backup). CE from site 3 has exist point to internet and how can i choice 1.1.1.2 is next-hop for default-route
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am working for a company based in Sydney Australia, the company recently open an office in London UK, therefore we are going to get leased lined based on MPLS.We were advised that Customer Edge router will be CISCO1941/K9. We want to our UK client to access our web-based applications via MPLS network instead of internet. The UK office is using BT Business ADSL with 5 Static IP address (please note the modem IP address is actually dynamic), we are going to get a Cisco 857/K9 router which will be used for the entry for the UK client to access the MPLS network. My question will be how do I configure the Cisco 857 router to allow one of the public ip to access the MPLS network. It appears that there are two options, and I am not sure if this is going to work or which one is working better. I have attached two diagrams for clarification of my case.
Option 1 Cisco WAN interface get Dynamic IP (PPPoA) from BT LAN Interface (4 Port) get the assigned 5 Static IP addresses One of the five IPs (217.xx.xx.169) will be assigned to the FE1 (Cisco 1941), any traffic to 217.xx.xx.169 will be routed to the WAN interface of Cisco 1941 to access Sydney service (located in Sydney LAN, mostly http and https traffic) One of the five IPs to 217.xx.xx.170 will be assigned to the WAN interface of Sonicwall Firewall Router which also serve as Internet Access Gateway for LAN users, All trafiic destined for Sydney LAN will be using FE0 (Cisco 1941) as gateway
Option 2Cisco WAN interface get Dynamic IP (PPPoA) from BT LAN Interface (4 Port) will get 192.168.0.1, Cisco 857 router will be the default gateway for LAN users, using one to many NAT, also one to one NAT, One of the five IPs (217.xx.xx.169) will be forwarded to the FE0 (Cisco 1941), any traffic to 217.xx.xx.169 will be routed to the WAN interface of Cisco 1941 to access Sydney service (located in Sydney LAN, mostly http and https traffic)
I've studied and labeled out MPLS and MPLS VPNs several times. The situation I'm presented with is a little different from most of the case studies I've seen in my MPLS books. I've attached a diagram.
We have a IPsec site to site tunnel from our main HQ router to a Cisco ASA 5510 in the core network in the colo. This allows our HQ office to reach the private sub nets in our core without using a Cisco VPN client. The problem we are running into is that this seems to be putting undue strain on the Cisco 2811. I feel like the 2811 should be able to handle it but doing any kind of upload or download through the tunnel spikes the CPU/Interrupts and makes the router CLI basically stop responding until the traffic transfer is stopped or completed. During this time, certain Cisco SCCP phones on our Broad works platform cycle while the SIP phones on the same platform are OK. We are trying to alleviate the load on the 2811 by setting up a VRF from the HQ network to the private VRF used in the Core for private sub net communication. The problem I'm having is the the HQ also has some public traffic that I do not want to include in the VRFs and would like to have it travel through the P2P circuit we have and access the internet or other public devices through the core public IP Internet routing table.
The flow would be this:
-going to a public address use the public internet routing table
-going to private address in the 10.x.x.x or 172.x.x.x - use VRF to core Private network.
This is a little different of a set up from most of the VRF VPN examples I've seen. Most of those the CE devices is completely private. This is not the case at our HQ.
What are my best options to secure branch office connection to HQ over Provider MPLS cloud. Our existing Setup
<<HeadQuarter>> :: DataCenter hosting Email, ERP, Intranet, Voice Services 10mb link to Service Provider over MPLS CloudMPLS is terminated on a 3825 Router running advance Services
<<BrancOffice>>::Total 10 In Country Branch Offices2mb Link to Service Provider over MPLS CloudTotal users in each branch : 20 MPLS is terminated on a 2811 Router running advance Services
i have 2811 router can, i use the below image on it , i m thinking to run bgp with ISP to accept just default route.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI m using ospf between HO and Branches for two links. branch router are 2811 and HO router 3845. when i enable ospf at branch i get all branch route like HO router and a default route. My requirement is each branch get only HO but no other branch. I have no default route.
I attached show ip route status for a branch router.. Why default route comes and why all branch's route come ?
My 2811 is connected with two ISP,s as below and have VPN with Central branch.I want to set DSL as primary and WiMax as secondary but problem is that routes learned via BGP get precedence over default route as they are specific one.I think i may need to put all static specific routes of central branch over DSL along defautl but I want any idea if my default route stay active and when it down then BGP neighborship can be establish (like ip sla tracking.)
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have cisco 2811 at branch and 3845 at Head office. Two link with 256 kbps bandwidthe each. I did as follows: [code]
When link 1 down, traffic change to Tunnel 2. its OK.I want when link1 flaxuate or latency high (more than 60 ms) traffice change to tunnel 2. If link 2 goes high latency automatically change to tunnel 1.
configuring policy based route for my cisco router?Basically, I have a 2811 cisco router with 2 ADSL ports. 1 port is for iiNet line and another port is for Telstra line.I want to configure a policy based route on the router so that:Any traffic coming from 1 internal IP (i.e. 172.16.x.1) will go through iinet line (i.e. Dialer 0) interface.Any traffic from rest of the office will go through the Telstra line (i.e. Dialer 1) interface. Is there any easy way to configure this policy based route?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have P router (7206VXR) and I need to export netflow from its MPLS interfaces to the netflow software.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have done a bunch of research in trying to re-use an old card/router for testing our new MPLS link. I have a 45m DS3 and was wondering if the PA-MC-T3= card will work UN-channelized. I have tried the "no channelized" command under the controller to no avail. I believe that the card only works for channelized T1's.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have few inter-AS and Hub & Spoke MPLS L3VPNs up and running but, all of them uses plain IPv4 on the PE-to-CE connecting interfaces for switching the L3VPN customer traffic. While, this is ok to route traffic between customer sites over a ISP backbone using the VRF and MP-BGP/LDP configurations which does the MPLS forwarding in the ISP backbone, i would like to know, how to enable MPLS forwarding on the PE-CE links as well to make it MPLS right from CE1 - PE1 - P - PE2 - CE2 all the way for the VPN traffic.
This way, even the last mile access to CE devices will be an MPLS link over a Ethernet PHY so that, the traffic originating from CE1 to CE 2 will be carried on a MPLS tagged Ethernet frame instead of IPoEthernet frame.
How to calculate aggregate bandwidth of MPLS link. Is there any tool available for the same.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am having cisco asa 5520 with internet having public ip and cisco 2911 with mpls link in my office. the mpls link is between my HO and my branchmi am putting my webserver in the branch side i want to port forward one of my publicip in my office to be forwarded to branch we, server.is it poosible on the firewall ouside the local network.
View 3 Replies View RelatedRunning ASA5585’s in active/standby across a local campus MPLS network. Supported design, leading practice etc. Specifically our design is that two ASA5585 are configured as active/standby through a local campus MPLS network over 10gig links through ASR9k etc. The ASA’s are providing inter-vrf routing capability only with p2p l2vpn circuits configured for each logical interface between the ASA over MPLS etc.The failover link is via a direct fibre and the state link will be through a p2p l2vpn (option for direct fibre also)Is this a supported design to begin with?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI want a router to terminate 100Mbps MPLS link on it. Can Cisco 2951 will be suitable for this or i have to go on to 3900 series or 7200 series
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a ME6524 running as a MPLS P router. We want to mirror a port to capture a specific traffic stream (to a probe). As the port is an MPLS LDP port will this work, will both the VACL and SPAN work with MPLS tagged packets, or does the mirror and VACL work after the labels have been removed..?
View 1 Replies View RelatedInstallation of 2 x 4 Mbps MPLS circuit on primary router (CISCO 2951) and 1 x 8 Mbps Ethernet link on secondary router (Cisco 2951). We have successfully implement the primary router with 2 x 4 Mbps MPLS circuit. Site is having two computer room CR1 and CR2 and distance between both room is 200mts. CR1 is having primary core router and primary core switch where the service provider terminated the new MPLS circuit and we have done the successful implementation. CR2 is having Secondary core router and secondary core switch where we needs to have the termination of Ethernet link but service provider has delivered the Ethernet link on the CR1 which is incorrect DMARC Location.
Both the computer rooms are connected via optical copper can we use that copper to connect the circuit on CR2, as per my understanding we can use the optical fiber to connect the wind circuit on secondary router on CR2 by using the media connector.
I'm having an issue with my Cisco 2811. The Internal FastEthernet0/1 interface is showing Link up but Protocol down. I have tried various combinations with the speed and duplex on the port and having no luck.The port connects to our Fortigate 110c router.
View 5 Replies View Relateddoes cisco 2811 support?if no, can i make it work for BGP?also, i want to know the configuration of bGP for twoo ISPs for link failover.it will be google if u tell me step by step approach for configuring it
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a module of HWIC-4ESW installed into Cisco 2811 router where 3 WAN link is terminited. Suddently WAN links stopped working from last night. I have performed shutdown and no shutdown in the interface but still the the WAN link was not working. After performing a reboot the WAN link started working. No error logs were generated while the WAN link was down.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have 2811 Cisco ISR and two ISP links - one is 8 Mbps and the second is 4 Mbps. The question is - is it possible to aggregate link speed up to 12 Mbps?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm looking into upgrading my WAN link to 100Mb via Fast Ethernet link. I'm waiting to hear from ISP about what exact technology they use, but according to my manager they will be coming in over fiber and then terminate to copper. I currently have 2811 in production with two T1 cards bundled together. 2811 has basic configuration with only 2 ACLs. I have ASA 5510 for NAT, Ipsec and other services. What router or networking device (layer 3 switch, such as 3560G perhaps??) should I use to accomodate 100Mb link? It seems that 2811 will not handle that kind of bandwith..In short the max recommended bandwidth limits for the 28xx series are as follows:
2801--2 Mbps
2811-4 Mbps
2821-8 Mbps
2851-12 Mbps
I don't want to create a bottleneck and am looking for appropiate solution to accomodate 100Mb link. Also, could ASA 5510 become a bottleneck in my scenario?According to Cisco docs ASA5510 can handle 300Mbps of firewall througput, but I'm not sure how it'd work in production...
I'm trying to have a website name: remote.test.com route to a local IP address but can't seem to get it working with this router. I don't want to use the windows hosts file as there are different Operating Systems that will connect and so routing though this D-Link is the only option. I have my wireless router connected to a separate network switch though it's WAN port where other computers sit as well as the target machine. I can use the internet as normal like this so things are working fine.
[code]...
I have a media player wired to my dir-655. I have a wrt300 on the same network to use for vpn. I live in Canada, and to use Netflix etc, from the US, I need to use the vpn.Is it possible to have the media player routed through the wrt300, rather than discovering all the IP addresses for Netflix etc and routing each one?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to create a route from a VPN ip to the VPN server in my LAN. Anyhow, the DIR-655 does not let me create routing within the LAN (since only the WAN interface option is available).I have tried with the following firmwares: 1.11, 1.21, 1.30.
View 8 Replies View RelatedIs it possible with the DIR-601 to have one of the IP's on the LAN route all traffic through a proxy server? I would like to have my Roku device (which I've setup as a static on the LAN side) to always connect though a proxy, while all my other devices connect to the internet normally.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have the above router on 10.10.10.1 which I'm quite familiar with but I need reaching a VM residing on one of my internal MAC's. My cisco route table is as follows:
Gateway of last resort is 93.97.20.1 to network 0.0.0.0
93.0.0.0/21 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 93.97.16.0 is directly connected, ATM0.1
10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 10.10.10.0 is directly connected, BVI1
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 93.97.20.1
The internal physical machine that contains the VM is 10.10.10.9 whose routing table is:
Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
default 10.10.10.1 UGSc 6 8 en0
10.10.10/24 link#4 UCS 5 0 en0
10.10.10.1 0:1b:2b:cc:7:8a UHLWI 7 1248 en0 284
10.10.10.9 127.0.0.1 UHS 0 86171 lo0
10.10.10.11 0:23:54:2a:6:d3 UHLWI 0 234 en0 150
10.10.10.30 0:9:34:28:60:2e UHLWI 0 25 en0 857
10.10.10.111 0:1d:ec:2:2d:2d UHLWI 1 1599 en0 721
10.10.10.255 link#4 UHLWbI 2 18609 en0
10.37.129/24 link#8 UC 2 0 vnic1
10.37.129.2 0:1c:42:0:0:9 UHLWI 1 2 lo0
10.37.129.255 link#8 UHLWbI 2 14046 vnic1
10.211.55/24 link#7 UC 2 0 vnic0
10.211.55.2 0:1c:42:0:0:8 UHLWI 0 2 lo0
10.211.55.255 link#7 UHLWbI 2 14046 vnic0
127 127.0.0.1 UCS 0 0 lo0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 5 214223 lo0
169.254 link#4 UCS 0 0 en0
The VM has a static IP of 10.211.55.5 and can obviously ping out to the rest of my lan but as of yet my router and other machines on the 10.10.10/24 subnet cannot reach the VM. I sort of presume this is a simple task of adding some kind of static route on my router and then all other machine will know how to get to the VM. So what do I need to do as I have about 40 or so customers already connected of whom I do not wish to suddenly halt their access due to my inexperienced attempts to create this route or new link(s)
I've enabled antispoof on all interfaces on asa 5510.If you start a traceroute to a network on the default route, everything works, since replies comes to an interface with route 0.0.0.0/0 defined.If you start a tracer route to a network that is NOT on the default route (let's assume coporate MPLS), you only get response from first carrier router, the other are discarded because of anti spoof violation.
I have ICMP inspection and icmp-error inspection enabled.
I am trying to create a static route on the TP-Link TD-W8950ND router, however am a little confused about the interface I should use. The default gateway on the route is another router on the LAN. I have a choice to use interface pppoe (telstra), LAN/br01 (bridge) or no interface. I was assuming I didn't need to use any interface as this is not a bridge setup and is on the LAN, but when I select "no interface" it doesn't save the static route settings.Also, when I select LAN/br01, the routing saves but doesn't actually work (tracert shows not going through the right router).
View 1 Replies View Related