does cisco 2811 support?if no, can i make it work for BGP?also, i want to know the configuration of bGP for twoo ISPs for link failover.it will be google if u tell me step by step approach for configuring it
View 1 RepliesWe have a customer who has a network consisting of two ISPs, one as a primary and the other as a backup. We are trying to create a configuration that would allow the primary link to fail and the secondary link to automatically pick up traffic and begin routing .how to set something like this up. Both routers are non Cisco routers and there for HSRP is out.
View 14 Replies View RelatedI have two ISP need to connect them on my router.
The Router that I have is 2811 where it contains two Fa ports only, so I put an access switch between the two ISPs and the Fa0/0 then configured the Interface Fa0/0 with two IPs ISP1 and ISP2 as a secondary.
The problem that I faced that when ISP1 become down the another secondary IP (ISP2) stay down and the internal users have no access to the internet.
I have a two fiber connection from our Central Office(6513) to Remote office (6509). I have a requirement that on the remote office if one of the fiber goes down, the second fiber should work as a failover. I am planning to use SUP720-3B SFP to connect to the CO.
Can I connet one fiber to Sup720-3b G5/1 & another fiber connection to G5/2? or Can I connet one fiber to Sup720-3b G5/1 & another fiber connection to G6/2? I am running EIGRP between sites. Any sample config.
sup-bootflash:s72033-pk9sv-mz.122-18.SXD7b.bin"
I have 2 ISPs terminating on 2 FE ports on my 2811 router.ISP1 had always been here, used for the following:Internet access to LAN usersInternet access with public IP mapping to servers in different security zones (VLANS)Site to Site VPN tunnels to 3rd party partnersRemote VPN access to 3rd party partners We recently got a second ISP, mainly for the following:Internet access and public IP mapping to servers on seperate security zones (VLANS)Site to Site VPN tunnels to 3rd party partners as above, but different hosts So far, ISP1 and all the above service have worked based on the config below. However, having added ISP2, I have not been able to successfully create the site-to-site VPN tunnels.
version 12.4
!
ip source-route
!
ip cef
!
ip name-server 4.2.2.2
ip name-server 137.65.1.1
ip inspect WAAS enable
[code]....
Whenver I try to establish a tunnel on SDM_CMAP_2 and run a test using CCP, I get 2 failure reasons:
1. The peer must be routed through the crypto map interface. The following peer(s) are routed through non-crypto map interface - 4.58.130.130
2. The tunnel traffic destination must be routed through the crypto map interface. The following destinations are routed through non-crypto map interface - 4.58.130.134
The tunnels on SDM_CMAP_1 are all active Do I need to include a default route for the second ISP on the router? If so, how do I get this done? When I tried it, I had loops on the user LAN segment of the network.
In one of our regional office I want to terminate 2 Internet links on a single 2811 Router and use both the links as primary and backup to enable site to site VPN. This also gives redundancy option if primary link fails. The Router has total 3 FE ports.
Current setup is terminating one internet link only on the router and establish site to site VPN to our HQ
ISP_Router--------------ASA_Firewall---------------------L3_sw_3560--------------------users
I'm trying to see if I can use both ethernet ports on a 2811 to run hsrp for non-stacked dual switch fail over. Then link the the NM-32A ports to L0, so the remote access server trying to use them can use the l0 ip and failover much faster (it's programming is limited). This is on IOS 12.4(25)f, though we are moving to 15 soon.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI understood that service provider will use hardware Alcatel 6850 on the distribution/core and Zyxel 2108G on customer access level.query is that service provider says it's not VPLS which should work most probably through MPLS network of ISP.ISP noted that it would be direct 802.1q VLAN between two sites without any Layer3 on ISP side.
How to:
- understand what kind of connection this will be?
- is this connection is fine for customer?
- identify if this kind of connection will be fine for converge network (voice+data) ?
- what should I ask to ISP to clarify details?
I have a Cisco 2851 (c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-25d.bin) Router configured with one site-to-site vpn. Is it possible to configure a failover vpn tunnel on this router?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have 2 PIX 525, which one of them, step and active failover mode the other PIX 525, leaving this off, do not know what happened may have been a power outage, but in any case I can turn it back on? And the other question I have is if I can import a configuration that I have saved on my computer. i have the PIX device manager.
View 11 Replies View RelatedWhat I currently have is a Cisco 891W Router as well as two ISP's (both with dynamic IP's) in. I'm currently just running one of my modems into the 891 through the FE8 port and then if for some reason I have an internet failure switching the ISP modems. What I'm wondering is if there is a fairly simple way to configure (and attach) both modems to this router and then set it up to handle this failover automatically?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI want to configure BGP but i am finding it very difficult to know BGP as I am new to this concept.
What is theoretical and practical approach to configure bgp??
I have to configure my office router 2811 for two ISPs which will be acting as fail-over.
I have to start it from scratch.
I have faced configuration of multiple nat/pat problem.Point is when I paste into router another nat pool or nat with route-map or just static nat they doesn't work I mean only one of them works.So, I have several connection hardware cisco 2811 latest ios 15.1
1. internet
2. Local host that must be translated into global local ip addresses be routed
3. vpn local hosts that must be translated into local global addres
I have a 2811 router that I need to confirm NAT configurations as expected. I have 2 deviced on the internal LAN that need to access remote resources without PAT. All the other devices are for a guest network with PAT. My interface Fa0/0 is connected to local network (1.1.1.1/23). Fa0/1 is connected to ISP (10.10.10.178/30). Addressable range from ISP of 10.10.10.192/28 (10.10.10.193-10.10.10.206). Internal machine 1.1.1.2 & 1.1.1.3 must connect to a remote server through internet on spacific port numbers.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI discover an issue with my CISCO ASA 5550 because I'm looking at the vlans that I have configured and some vlans on the Stand by device had not an IP address configured, checking the configuration of the failover
View 2 Replies View Relatedsample configuration for internet failover . i have 2 ISPs with one coming in thought a serial cable and another through internet and would wish one take over after the other has failed .The router is Cisco 1921 .
View 4 Replies View RelatedClient has an ASA5505 anchoring an MPLS network. One of their branch offices is experiencing frequent circuit outages due to theft of copper lines. I am looking at an 881G with wireless aircard as a backup solution and creating a VPN tunnel to the ASA but am unsure about how to handle routing on the ASA. There will already be a route for the branch subnet for the MPLS network.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have ASA running code 8.0.4 with Active/Standby for quite long time. Today when we gave the command wri standby it started sync the config to standby ASA but waited forever.when we checked the show failover, we got the following result.
This host: Secondary - Active
Active time: 1928633 (sec)
slot 0: ASA5540 hw/sw rev (2.0/8.0(4)) status (Up Sys)
Interface PERIMETER-MGMT (10.12.8.1): Normal (Not-Monitored)
Interface OUTSIDE (86.36.xx.xx): Normal (Waiting)
[code].....
When we console to Standby ASA and tried to save (wri mem), we got the following error and also please note the hostname has become default...?
ciscoasa(config)# wri memory
Building configuration...
Command Ignored, Configuration in progress...
[FAILED]
and when we tried to give following command we got this error:
ciscoasa(config)# copy running-config startup-config
Source filename [running-config]?
%Error reading system:/running-config (Configuration temporarily locked)
ciscoasa(config)#
I see here the standby ASA IPS module is down, but can that issue cause not sync the config backup and writing to nvram (save config)..?
I have 2 ASA 5540s ver 8.3 in Active/Standby state.I am considering a future hypothetical situation where I might need to rename interfaces or reallocate redundant interface groups. Doing so obviously has a major impact on the current primary configuration. My goal would be to minimize or eliminate network downtime during the interface changes.
I am wondering if it is possible to force the secondary ASA from the standby to active state.Then temporarily disable failover on the primary unit.Make the interface changes on the primary unit Then reactivate failover on the primary unit Force the primary unit back to active and secondary unit to standby My new interface configuration would then sync from the primary to the secondary.
I believe this would work but must ensure that the secondary ASA can function as the active unit while the failover is disabled on the primary unit. Is there a set length of time the secondary unit can remain active without a failover peer?
see issues with operating the secondary unit in this manner while making changes to the primary unit?
Our servers are hosted at the Main site, site office A access to the Main site for Internet and servers. We are thinking NextG to take over when the link between sites goes down.
To start with, what is the configuration for 3750 at Site A and the Main site:
1) Trunking for both switches
2) Routing
3) the automatic failover configuration for the switch at Site A.
I have several Cisco 2811 ISR Routers that are functioning as CallManager MGCP voice gateways. These routers have prtial PRI's attached to them which I realize are not supported by Cisco CallManager using MGCP. The problem is that whenever the router gets rebooted, the configuration under Controller T1 ends up with the improper PRI Timeslots command and I have to go in and manually change it. Solution: I have developed smal text files for each router that contains all of the commends needed to get the chnage accomplished (you have to shut down things and remove lines elsewhere to be able to change the PRI Timeslots) and I just telnet to the router and cut and paste the commands into the router.However, I would like to store those files on the router in such a way that I could telenet to the router and then either somehow display the file and then copy/paste it in or possible have a file that could be run to make the changes. That way I could do the job quickly fram anyplace I could telnet to the router and not have to have the text files on the local machine.
View 1 Replies View Relatedi trying to set up a terminal server, 2811 with an HWIC-16A und two octo cables. [code] connect and sometimes not. It seems the connection is established but i don't get a prompt von the target device.The target devices are cisco 2811 and cisco catalysts 3560.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have 2 ASA 5510's setup in an active, standby failover configuration. When the primary fails over to standby, the 3rd party cert does not failover to the standby ASA. The users then receive the CERT missing, invalid message and have to select yes, no to move on. This does not occur when the primary is not in failover mode. It is my understanding that failover fails over certs but in our case it does not apper to be working correctly.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to establish EIGRP neighborships with my inside switches (3750s) over the "Internal" interface, shown in green. The outside interface is g0/0 and don't worry, I've ensured EIGRP is not running there.The problem I'm having is that I need to monitor the "Internal" link so that if it goes down, the ASA triggers the failover to the secondary firewall connected to the other switch. I was told that the "secondary" keyword was what enabled this:
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
nameif Inside
security-level 100
ip address 10.10.2.2 255.255.255.0 standby 10.10.2.3
This is fine since I am able to compare this config to the firewalls that are currently in production elsewhere in the environment and this is what's in use there. However, in order to run EIGRP all the way to the firewall and not rely on something else like HSRP for the inbound traffic, I'd like to run the corresponding links (Gi1/0/22) on the inside switches as routed ports (no switchport) so that I don't have to establish neighborships with SVIs or something like that. I want the routing to be done directly to the port, leaving the interfaces for failover and our DMZ set up as switchports, since those can be layer 2.It's saying the Internal interface has failed now, probably because it cannot send hellos through this, since it's a routed port on the switch side. I'm wondering if this simply is an impossible design, unless there's a way to track this interface and trigger a failover if it goes down using another method.a method that allows me to track that internal interface (Gi0/1) and trigger a failover if it goes down.
I had a working active/passive pair of ASA5510's, and then I had to do a rush firmware upgrade, but didn't have time to do it on the secondary at the same time. Now I have made config changes and upgraded the secondary firmware to be the same, and wish to know if I plug it back in if it will think the secondary has the "correct" config or if it will know that the primary is newer. I disconnected the failover cable because it was complaining about version mismatches constantly.
Is it safe to add the secondary back in or is it possible it will be declared newer and overwrite the config?
have remote routers boot and load a config from the flash card. It seems this is possible if the Flash Class is A, according to the Cisco web site using the
boot config flash:<Config file>
where <Config file> is the file on the flash.
Although this can be applied on 2811 routers, they fail to load the file on the flash card. I've since found that this router type has a Class C flash. So the question is, can either:
Is there a similar process for other classes of Flash cards, specifically Class C?
or
The router flash be set as a Class A to support this functionality,
The preferred resolution for this would be the first as there are many remote routers installed a diverse and difficult locations to visit, should a format/rebuild of the flash fail for some reason.
don't ask to list the output of a show boot or show bootvar, neither of these commands work. The Startup/Running config lists the boot config line.
I have a Cisco 2811 Router. I have two VLANS on the router. The first one of course is VLAN 1 and the second one is one that I created from reading everything from this forum.. it is called VLAN 531
On VLAN one I have an IP address of 10.8.1.1 and on VLAN 531 I have an IP Address of 172.16.1.1, now what I can do is this... I can.. from a workstation on the 10.8.0.0 segment, ping 172.16.1.1 and one server on that segment that has an IP address of 172.16.1.50, which is fine, but what I really want to be able to do is ping our email server which is on a 10.21.0.0 segment and I cannot. Any commands on what I would need to do to make this work as I would like the 172.16.0.0 segment to ping any other part of my LAN of my choosing.
Will 2811 Router with 4 switch port module, How to do dual ISP configuration on this router.
View 10 Replies View RelatedWe have CISCO2811 model with VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 module working good over the E1 line. Since it's getting hard to find new model of CISCO2811 we decided to connect new branches with CISCO2911/K9 model (according to migration doc)
My question is can we use 2811's old config file with the 2911 model directly?
I have a laptop with a single physical NIC which I have used the advanced management tools to create two virtual NICs (say vlan 10 and vlan 20) and both are on the same subnet (say 192.168.4.x). One NIC is for normal TCP/IP traffic and one is for broadcast/multicast traffic (I have some custom software that requires this to be the case and works fine on an older laptops with built-in physical NIC and PCMCIA XIRCOM NIC). The dual NIC laptop communicates with a dual NIC server via a Cisco 2811 router (which has a 16 port switch module at the back) and has vlans set up so.
What I want is for the single NIC laptop (with two virtual NICs) to be able to also communicate with the server. Basically, one NIC is for normal traffic and one is for multicast/broadcast traffic. All three machines need to be able to talk to each other using the NIC for normal traffic and both laptops must be able to receive broadcasts from the server. What is the best way to configure the router to handle the trunking/tagging? Most configuration documentation I read has two complete subnets for the two virtual NICs. Note that all three machines use static IPs and are part of a workgroup so no DNS and domain servers etc.
I am having trouble setting up a EHWIC-VA-DSL-A= card on my cisco 2811 running the following the following:c2800nm-adventerprosek9-mz.151-4.M2.bin and C2800NM_RM2.srec.124-13r.T11
My hardware supplier tells me its the right adsl card (have 1 existing working card not the same) but the card will not detect on the system to be configured.is this the right card? am I missing something?
I am using multiple cisco 2811, 3745 routers and 2950,3550 switches if I need to copy running configuration I have to go to each device and say copy run tftp: <address> Is here any way that automatically by schedule one a week or a month configuration copy from all devices to tftp server?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am planning to provide a redudnt link to our customer. The setup as below:
One link over wireless while the other link over wired link, I want to make sure that I should maintain the same public IP addresses for the customer therefore, I am looking for L2 failover for my customer.
If the wireless down the customer should migrated to wired and vis versa. I have 7200 CISCO Router as Core.