Looking through the SPROUTE course material they state on several occasions that an ABR will announce a default route in to a standard NSSA area, same as a stub area, because LSA5 external routes are not allowed.
View 8 RepliesI'm working on a little OSPF setup in my lab and having a problem pinging out to the internet.I have a setup with (3) 3550's running ip routing. I'm configuring OSPF but I can't ping the internet from any L3 switch except the switch with the actual uplink to the internet.[code] From SW2 and SW3, I can ping SW1 on all IPs (192.168.1.90, 10.10.10.1, 10.10.10.5) but I can't ping 192.168.1.1 which is my gateway to the internet.
View 3 Replies View RelatedHave a 1921 that has 3 eth connections (1 LAN, and 2 WAN) - I have 2 seperate OSPF processes (2 areas) on the WAN Ints - both upstream WAN's are sending defaults back to the 1921, and the 1921 is sending it's LAN range to them.
I have ip ospf cost 150 set on the "failover" WAN connection interface (Both on the 1921 and upstream), but the 1921 is preferring the default route from the "failover"?
The default routes are both being received by the 1921, but it's preferring the "failover" Int with the ip ospf cost 150 configured?
I have 2 ASBR routers, AGFR01RTR03 and AGFR02RTR03, performing OSPF to OSPF redistribution in both ways for the same ***. They also do summarization for our private addressing scheme. It is all working just fine for that part (neighbors, summarization, redistribution).
AGDC01RTR01 --- AGDC02RTR01 (OSPF 1000 ABRs)
| |
| |
AGFR01RTR03 --- AGFR02RTR03 (OSPF 1000 / 53 ASBRs)
Let's focus on AGDC01RTR01 with a specific entry here (IP subnet is fake) :
Routing entry for 1.1.1.0/25
Known via "ospf 1000", distance 110, metric 300, type inter area
Last update from 10.2.244.76 on GigabitEthernet5/1, 1d03h ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.2.244.76, from 10.2.1.249, 1d03h ago, via GigabitEthernet5/1
Route metric is 300, traffic share count is 1
[code]...
I've enabled antispoof on all interfaces on asa 5510.If you start a traceroute to a network on the default route, everything works, since replies comes to an interface with route 0.0.0.0/0 defined.If you start a tracer route to a network that is NOT on the default route (let's assume coporate MPLS), you only get response from first carrier router, the other are discarded because of anti spoof violation.
I have ICMP inspection and icmp-error inspection enabled.
why a subnet wouldn't be passed on to just one participating OSPF device?
I have two routers and an ASA, all of which are in area 0, it's a pretty simple config. The two routers are connected to some other devices (also in area 0) that pass of an external route to a particular subnet, let's call it 192.168.4.0. The routers are getting it just fine, but the ASA is not:
Cisco device is neighbored up with a Brocade device via OSPF, and the desired routes are present.This Brocade device is neighbored up with another Brocade device via OSPF over a GRE tunnel. I am not seeing the desired routes present.What kinds of things can I look at to determine the issue? I think I've viewed the OSPF topology database (I'm not that familiar with Brocade) with the show ip ospf routes command and I'm not seeing the desired routes there either.There is no form of route filtering in place. I'll double check, but I do not believe there is any stub routing going on either.
View 12 Replies View RelatedOur current router is setup to redistribute our BGP routes into OSPF using the following code:
-router ospf 60
-log-adjacency-changes
-redistribute bgp 65199 metric 1500 metric-type 1 subnets
I want to filter down the routes so only a set of specific routes is redistributed.. we have done this in the past with EIGRP by doing a route-map / prefix-list to manage the routes passed into EIGRP.My question is I can replicate the metric and the metric-type in the route-map by doing the following: [code] Do I need to be concerned witht the "subnets" command in this design? What I understand "Subnets".When redistributing routes into OSPF, only routes that are not subnetted are redistributed if the subnets keyword is not specified. I suspect I need to add it! So my final code should look like this..
I m using ospf between HO and Branches for two links. branch router are 2811 and HO router 3845. when i enable ospf at branch i get all branch route like HO router and a default route. My requirement is each branch get only HO but no other branch. I have no default route.
I attached show ip route status for a branch router.. Why default route comes and why all branch's route come ?
I cannot receive any OSPF route from Nexus to ASR1002 even they are both OSPF neighbour. I have attached the config for both, Both Nexus and ASR part of Area0.
Config
ASR1002#sh ip ospf neighbor
Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface10.165.117.12 1 FULL/BDR 00:00:35 10.231.175.226 GigabitEthernet0/0/0
[Code].....
I have an MPLS router that connects to the core network.This router distributes (per route maps) routes from OSPF into BGP and from BGP into OSPF.The OSPF Process conencts a 6509 to the 7206 MPLS router. There are some routes in the OSPF process that I have filtered out of the 6509. They do not show up inthe 6509 at all and this is the only way they can be getting into the 7206.Checking the 6509 database, this route is gone, but it stays in the 7206 until I clear the route manually. The result is the route still gets distributed into MPLS. [code]
One thing to note, there are two possible OSPF paths the route gets into OSPF, one of them, the route is filtered with distribute-list on the 6509, which means it is still in the database, so it is still in the 7206 database, and still get distributed into BGP on the 7206, correct?
I have a Cisco 2620XM Router, running ver. 12.2 (7r). I have OSPF connected, however the OSPF routes are not populating in the sh ip route display. The neighbor relationship is established. The sh ip ospf database does display the other routers running ospf, however only connected (C) and static (S) routes appear.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have a 14 offfice MPLS network. All offices have Cisco 3750s running OSPF which replicate route tables via our providers BGP peers. I am introducing a new network in our SF office which is not directly connected so in SF we have a static route "ip route 172.16.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.1. I want our other offices to learn this route route via OSPF so that they know how to get to the new network. My problem is that of course remote sites do not see our static routes and i have tried to add this via ospf but the switch will not propagate this route because it is not directly connected to the switch in SF.
router ospf 1
log-adjacency-changes
network 10.2.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 2.2.2.2
[Code]......
I have a Catalyst switch that is redistributing some static routes into OSPF. These are received on a Nexus 7K and appear in the database however the 7K does not add them to its routing table, one of the routes is ignored and not added. I haven't got a clue why this is happening.
The routes on the Catalyst are as follows with ID of 172.30.255.22:
ip route 172.24.59.0 255.255.255.0 10.56.7.46
ip route 192.168.168.0 255.255.255.0 10.56.7.62
on the 7K the database shows:
172.24.59.0 172.30.255.22 1374 0x80001a44 0x1a48 0
192.168.168.0 172.30.255.22 1374 0x80001a45 0x6c5b 0
The routing table shows:
sh ip ro 172.24.59.0/24IP Route Table for VRF "default"'*' denotes best ucast next-hop'**' denotes best mcast next-hop'[x/y]' denotes [preference/metric]
172.24.59.0/24, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 172.30.253.10, Po7, [110/20], 20w4d, ospf-NCC, type-2
sh ip ro 192.168.168.0/24IP Route Table for VRF "default"'*' denotes best ucast next-hop'**' denotes best mcast next-hop'[x/y]' denotes [preference/metric] Route not found
We have multiple sites that are linked via MPLS (L3) circuits. We have good size circuits for Internet at two main sites (HQ and QC) and smaller sites come to HQ site to go to internet. We are running ospf (Cisco L3 switches) with service provider (ME3400) at these two main sites and service provider then redistributes routes back into MPLS via BGP and then smaller sites ME3400 learn these routes. i am injecting default routes from HQ and QC, but Telco is only redistributing default from HQ. So large pipe Internet at QC is not being used effeciently. Also if MPLS at HQ fails, then we are told, we need to call Telco and they will make change in their network to now start distributing default from QC.it was my understanding that telco can use BGP communities and advertize one default as prefered and second with higher cost, so that failover can occur automatically. And that they can also set up so that west cost sites use HQ and east cost sites can use QC for going to internet, but they say it is not possible.it the least, can I do something like this at my end for failover for internet, in case MPLS at HQ goes down (soon we will be setting up a point to point VPN tunnel between HQ and QC so that MPLS failure at HQ will trigger advertisement of HQ routes over tunnel via QC into MPLS, so other sites can then come to HQ thru QC over this tunnel. At QC Cisco router (to detect loss of default route from HQ and then start advertizing default from QC)
router ospf 1
default-information originate always route-map From_HQ
exit
ip access-list standard From_HQ
[code]....
Ok I didn't setup my OSPF on my 7010. Today I found out that any static route I put into my 7010 gets sent into to my MPLS network. My 6509's you have to "Tag" the static rout for this to happen. Was under the impression the same was necessary for the 7010 or at least it had to "match" an access list. How can I fix the below so that by default all static routes are not resdistributed into OSPF?
[CODE]...
I'm currently working on a plan to migrate our 6500's over to our new 7010's. At the time of the migration I want to tighten up our OSPF design and configure OSPF for "passive-interface default" then allow only those interfaces that should have OSPF neighbors to send the hellos. The issue is that the command is not showing up under the OSPF process. What's even more interesting is that the Nexus 5.x Unicast Routing Configuration Guide shows that the "passive-interface default" command should be an option to enter.
I'm currently running version 5.1(4) (though looking to upgrade to 5.2 during my migration testing). I would rather configure the passive-interface via the routing process versus having to enter it on every interface.
I want to leak default internet route to CE VRF as common service.Since we having two ASBR, can I point next hop to PE itself instead of either of the ASBR?I tried to point NH to loopback of the PE itself but it failed.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI'm working on a practice lab and am having the following issue. I have a customer router connected to two different ISP routers. Each ISP router must advertise a default through BGP to the customer and one of the default routes must be preferred over the other. Given if the preferred route interface is shut down the other default route is inserted into the routing table and when the preferred default route interface it turned back on that path is used again. The catch is I cant alter the customer router only the the two ISP devices. I tried doing some route maps but I'm lost. I have deleted all my route maps and have posted the BGP portion of the ISP routers.
router bgp 300
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
[Code]....
Will ASA5510 support default route failover mechanism by giving two different AD value in the route outside command?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI bought a WRVS400N v2 to be used as an access point. Currently it is hooked up on my switch via a trunk port and is able to communicate with my gateway. Whenever I try to access an IP subnet other then the local IP address of the WRVS, I get a network unreachable error. To fix this for my local networks, I added the appropriate static route to cover my local LANs and that seems to work now. I tried to add route 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 using the web interface for internet access, but somehow it does not recognize this as a default route (quad zero!?). Does any know how I can set the default gateway in this router? Maybe, but hopefully not, I have to use the WAN port to create some kind of uplink and use one of the LAN ports to connect using the trunk port and route traffic for the clients over the WAN port .
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an 877 router which has a DSL WAN interface. The DSL service at this site is unreliable, so the company have purchased a separate 3G router to be used as a backup. This device maintains 3G connectivity at all times and has a static IP on the internal subnet (for arguments sake let's say 10.0.0.253).
What I want to do with the Cisco router is to track the DSL interface and if it is up, install a default route pointing to it. If it is down, I want the default route to be the 3G router.
I am thinking the best way to do this is to set up a track and then set 2 default routes; one which is installed if the tracking is up, the other has a higher admin distance and points to the 3G router and thus should only be used if the track is down. For example:
track 10 interface Dialer0 ip routing
delay down 30 up 30
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0 track 10
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.253 100
Is this likely to work or is there a better way to do it?
i have 2811 router can, i use the below image on it , i m thinking to run bgp with ISP to accept just default route.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to send all traffic through site to site VPN using SRP521W (on the other site ASA) ? Lets say, traffic to Internet from branch through HQ - site to site VPN between branch and HQ. I've tried to set up destination crypto policy entry to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 but it's not accepted. Firmware version is 1.01.26 (003)
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am having a strange requirement. actually I am not sure it is strange or not. I am having ASA5510 with 8.4 sw version. Currently one ISP is connected to it. It is working fine. We have some servers that are directly connected to internet using another ISP connection. These servers having public IP addresses configured on their LAN settings. I need to move these servers in to the DMZ zone.
When i connect it to the ASA's DMZ zone,servers will get internet through the first ISP that is already configured on ASA. But i need to NAT the DMZ servers with the IP address provided by the other ISP, which even not configured on ASA.
So what should i do? In short my requirement is
1) need to NAT the server with the IP address provided by another ISP
2) Also note that the default route is configured for the first ISP only in ASA
so Do i need to configure another default route? Do i need to make it with larger AD? So i do it will act as the secondary route only.
I need to make the ASA up and running for two ISP, and servers in the LAN should be able to NAT with the IPs of first ISP and ,the servers in the DMZ zone should be able to NAT with the public IP of the new ISP.
In case customers buy IP transit(there is a BGP session between ISP and customer), they often ask for default route and for example prefixes from local internet-exchanges. What is the advantage to have default route + certain smaller(for example /17, /18 and /24) prefixes?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have this topology: ( I use OSPF instead of EIGRP for routing between PE CE. The customer vrf name is cusA, they have 4 sites: CE from site 3 have 2 links to 2 PE ( one for backup). CE from site 3 has exist point to internet and how can i choice 1.1.1.2 is next-hop for default-route
View 2 Replies View RelatedMy 2811 is connected with two ISP,s as below and have VPN with Central branch.I want to set DSL as primary and WiMax as secondary but problem is that routes learned via BGP get precedence over default route as they are specific one.I think i may need to put all static specific routes of central branch over DSL along defautl but I want any idea if my default route stay active and when it down then BGP neighborship can be establish (like ip sla tracking.)
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a MPLS cloud in our data center. I want one network coming into our core router to have a different default route than the other networks coming in. I'm getting hits on the acl but the route isn't applied and goes to the default route that is configured in the router. I have other PBR for setting local-preferences and as-paths and they are working fine.
The router is a 7206 Version 12.4(11)T3
!
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.2.3.4
!
ip access-list extended 2nd_Default_Route
[Code].....
I have a Cisco 2960 ( WS-C2960-8TC-S) running 12.2(46)SE C2960-LANLITEK9-M image.I would like to set an ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 87.101.156.97 but the current image does not allow.Will ip default-gateway 87.101.156.97 work or do I need ip routing ?The ISP has provided a /30 address and we are using an additional /29 for our network devices. I dont think this image can be upgraded. I need to forward routes directly out to ISP. [code]
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe have a Nexus 7010 running version 6.1(2).
I'd like to use IP SLAs and object tracking to define static routes for specific source/destination traffic across some WAN links we have. I've done this in IOS and it's worked fantastically, but I've not found where/how to do this on the Nexus 7010 platform (or any Nexus platform) as of yet. I could have sworn that this was going to be introduced in the 6.x code? Below is an example of how we do this in the IOS world:
track 11 ip sla 1 reachability
delay down 15 up 15
ip sla 1
[Code]....
Esentially this gives us the option of using a "failover" default route. I've attached a basic diagram to explain what we are trying to do with IP SLAs and object checking. The tracking should be configured against an SLA that uses icmp and the static routes should be configured against the tracking.
IP SLA configuration fails over but cannot ping the 4.2.2.2 via Site B. Here is the output on Cisco 3750...
SW2#show runBuilding configuration...
Current configuration : 2901 bytes!version 12.2no service padservice timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname SW2!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!!!!no aaa
[Code].....
I have Cisco 7200vxr doing BGP with 2 directly connected ISP's over ethernet. I am receiving default routes only, and have added a higher weight to my routes learned from my primary ISP. below is my configuration (ip addresses changed of course)
router bgp 100 no synchronization bgp router-id x.x.x.x bgp log-neighbor-changes network 100.100.64.0 mask 255.255.254.0 network 100.100.71.0 network 100.100.78.0 mask 255.255.254.0
neighbor <ISP_A-IP> remote-as 200 neighbor <ISP_A-IP> weight 175 neighbor <ISP_B-IP> remote-as 300 neighbor <ISP_B-IP> weight 150 auto-summary
Advertising my rotues to the primary ISP is fine
7206vxr.rb#sh ip bgp neighbors <ISP_A-IP> advertised-routesBGP table version is 7, local router ID is x.x.x.xStatus codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S StaleOrigin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path*> 100.100.64.0/23 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i*> 100.100.71.0 100.100.64.57 0 32768 i*> 100.100.78.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
Total number of prefixes 3
However, advertisements to the secondary ISP inlcludes the defautl route learned from the primary 7206vxr.rb#sh ip bgp neighbors <ISP_B-IP> advertised-routes BGP table version is 7, local router ID is x.x.x.x Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 0.0.0.0 <ISP_A-IP> *> 100.100.64.0/23 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i*> 100.100.71.0 100.100.64.57 0 32768 i*> 100.100.78.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
Should I not just only be advertising just the networks that i specified in my configuration?