Is it possible to send all traffic through site to site VPN using SRP521W (on the other site ASA) ? Lets say, traffic to Internet from branch through HQ - site to site VPN between branch and HQ. I've tried to set up destination crypto policy entry to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 but it's not accepted. Firmware version is 1.01.26 (003)
View 4 RepliesI bought a WRVS400N v2 to be used as an access point. Currently it is hooked up on my switch via a trunk port and is able to communicate with my gateway. Whenever I try to access an IP subnet other then the local IP address of the WRVS, I get a network unreachable error. To fix this for my local networks, I added the appropriate static route to cover my local LANs and that seems to work now. I tried to add route 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 using the web interface for internet access, but somehow it does not recognize this as a default route (quad zero!?). Does any know how I can set the default gateway in this router? Maybe, but hopefully not, I have to use the WAN port to create some kind of uplink and use one of the LAN ports to connect using the trunk port and route traffic for the clients over the WAN port .
View 1 Replies View RelatedHave a 1921 that has 3 eth connections (1 LAN, and 2 WAN) - I have 2 seperate OSPF processes (2 areas) on the WAN Ints - both upstream WAN's are sending defaults back to the 1921, and the 1921 is sending it's LAN range to them.
I have ip ospf cost 150 set on the "failover" WAN connection interface (Both on the 1921 and upstream), but the 1921 is preferring the default route from the "failover"?
The default routes are both being received by the 1921, but it's preferring the "failover" Int with the ip ospf cost 150 configured?
I've enabled antispoof on all interfaces on asa 5510.If you start a traceroute to a network on the default route, everything works, since replies comes to an interface with route 0.0.0.0/0 defined.If you start a tracer route to a network that is NOT on the default route (let's assume coporate MPLS), you only get response from first carrier router, the other are discarded because of anti spoof violation.
I have ICMP inspection and icmp-error inspection enabled.
We've come across an issue whereby the WAN port fails to light up with an Adtran Total Access 832 (via bonded SHDSL) unit.
Eventually the WAN port does light up after connecting and disconnecting it several times with the ethernet cable. However as a test I power cycled the router with the WAN cable disconnected and had a strange issue where the WAN light would constantly flash and show up in the web gui as being connected when in fact the Adtran Unit showed the device was not connected at all.
This is the second Cisco SRP521W router in place as the original one disconnects overnight without any load and a power cycle would fix the issue, but this replacement router disconnects during business hours (even worse for the customer) and power cycling does not bring it back online. We've adjusted the WAN port to 10MB Full on both devices and hope that it stays up. I am wondering if any has had a similar experience? Would this be a behaviour of a faulty unit or may it not be compatible with the Adtran Total Access 832 (via bonded SHDSL) unit perhaps?
I have a problem in connecting SRP521w with CCA v3.2. I tried to connect the device with CCA but it said that that the device is unsupported. I already upgraded the router's firmware with v1.01.26.
Here is what the CCA looks like every time I try to connect with the router :
Cisco srp521w router vpn configuration. company has wan static ip to router. enable vpn Cisco server in router. connected with Cisco vpn client. route failed in log. Need to access a PC on the company site with address 192.168.15.105 and router with gateway 192.168.15.1.
How do i configure ip pool ? different ip address? if i connect how do i access pc 192,168.15,105 ? remote pc with 192.168.1.100.
I have a router SRP521W I wonder if you can setup a self-attendant or ivr to this device.
View 4 Replies View RelatedHave followed the admin guide, and can setup this up fine, however what we're wanting is to turn off any IP connection for the main wan ethernet interface and only have the sub-interface have an IP connection method.
I can't see how you can turn this off, which is causing a double-up of dhcp requests being sent when using both the main/sub ethernet interfaces to use dhcp.
This has been tested on the 521w and 521w-u versions, and I've just used the latest firmware 1.2.4 on the u version.
How can this be configured so that there is only 1 WAN interface that is using IP (the sub interface) Setting default routes to point to the sub interface doesn't make a difference.
Any recommendation for creating a configuration template for the SRP521W? I can use the Admin-->Backup Config to get a xxx.cfg file, but I cannot edit it with notepad++. Also, i know the config can be view via view-source: [URL], but how would I load a modified copy of this back to the router?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI am trying to create a VPN between a SRP521W (only point-to-point VPN) and a UC560 (VPN server) and it seems it doesn't works (SRP doesn't create the tunnel).
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe have been using a SRP521W as the main Router for an office with about 25 users.
So on the cable network it's about 25 computers, 25 IP Phones, 3 printers. Wireless network hold some smartphones and tablets. Computer traffic is 100% Remote Desktop.
That said, for the last few days network connectivity sucks. I think the problem is, precisely, the SRP521W. Some mornings the WAN link is down and can only be brought up by a router reboot.
There's an IPSec tunnel to HQ.
Wireless network was moved recently to a WAP121 to offload the SRP521W. It has two networks: internal and customers with two VLANs.
CPU Usage is around 30-45% all day and spikes to 100% sometimes. RAM Usage is 40-45%. I do not know if this is "too much", "average" or "really low load".
Anyway, time for questions:
a) How can I get a table of active connections on the firewall/NAT to see if there anything "strange" on the network traffic that maybe causing issues?
b) Is there any know bug in the VLAN handling of the SRP that maybe causing the issue? (it's one of the latests changes introduced).
c) If the problem is that there's too much load for such a small router, what replacement would you recommend given the details above? (remember I do not really need wireless on the router as I have the wap121).
I have one SRP521W-K9-G1 and need to provide guest internet access without access to my network. What is the best way to configure this?
View 3 Replies View RelatedJust brought another set of SRP521W, after changed the WAN setting to PPPOE, we unable to access the web management. The power/sys light will keep blink when trying to access the web management. We able to ping it. We tried the reset button but it did not work as well. Is that a way to upgrade the firmware without using the web management?
View 4 Replies View Relatedi cannot access the web managemnet interface of this router from a different subnet.THe WAN interface is a 4G LTE connection,I have disabled both the SPI firewall and NAT and enabled remote management from any ip address but i cannot access the admin web page from a remote subnet.Doing a port scan of the routers WAN or LAN address i cannot see any ports open at all...its as if firewall or NAT is still enabled somehow.
View 0 Replies View RelatedUsing a 3G USB Modem (Huwaei E153) the mobile network status is connected however the Wan Interface (AutoConfiguration -DHCP) is displayed as Disconnected (Physical layer disconnected).
View 2 Replies View RelatedI want to leak default internet route to CE VRF as common service.Since we having two ASBR, can I point next hop to PE itself instead of either of the ASBR?I tried to point NH to loopback of the PE itself but it failed.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI'm working on a practice lab and am having the following issue. I have a customer router connected to two different ISP routers. Each ISP router must advertise a default through BGP to the customer and one of the default routes must be preferred over the other. Given if the preferred route interface is shut down the other default route is inserted into the routing table and when the preferred default route interface it turned back on that path is used again. The catch is I cant alter the customer router only the the two ISP devices. I tried doing some route maps but I'm lost. I have deleted all my route maps and have posted the BGP portion of the ISP routers.
router bgp 300
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
[Code]....
Looking through the SPROUTE course material they state on several occasions that an ABR will announce a default route in to a standard NSSA area, same as a stub area, because LSA5 external routes are not allowed.
View 8 Replies View RelatedWill ASA5510 support default route failover mechanism by giving two different AD value in the route outside command?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an 877 router which has a DSL WAN interface. The DSL service at this site is unreliable, so the company have purchased a separate 3G router to be used as a backup. This device maintains 3G connectivity at all times and has a static IP on the internal subnet (for arguments sake let's say 10.0.0.253).
What I want to do with the Cisco router is to track the DSL interface and if it is up, install a default route pointing to it. If it is down, I want the default route to be the 3G router.
I am thinking the best way to do this is to set up a track and then set 2 default routes; one which is installed if the tracking is up, the other has a higher admin distance and points to the 3G router and thus should only be used if the track is down. For example:
track 10 interface Dialer0 ip routing
delay down 30 up 30
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0 track 10
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.253 100
Is this likely to work or is there a better way to do it?
i have 2811 router can, i use the below image on it , i m thinking to run bgp with ISP to accept just default route.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am having a strange requirement. actually I am not sure it is strange or not. I am having ASA5510 with 8.4 sw version. Currently one ISP is connected to it. It is working fine. We have some servers that are directly connected to internet using another ISP connection. These servers having public IP addresses configured on their LAN settings. I need to move these servers in to the DMZ zone.
When i connect it to the ASA's DMZ zone,servers will get internet through the first ISP that is already configured on ASA. But i need to NAT the DMZ servers with the IP address provided by the other ISP, which even not configured on ASA.
So what should i do? In short my requirement is
1) need to NAT the server with the IP address provided by another ISP
2) Also note that the default route is configured for the first ISP only in ASA
so Do i need to configure another default route? Do i need to make it with larger AD? So i do it will act as the secondary route only.
I need to make the ASA up and running for two ISP, and servers in the LAN should be able to NAT with the IPs of first ISP and ,the servers in the DMZ zone should be able to NAT with the public IP of the new ISP.
In case customers buy IP transit(there is a BGP session between ISP and customer), they often ask for default route and for example prefixes from local internet-exchanges. What is the advantage to have default route + certain smaller(for example /17, /18 and /24) prefixes?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have this topology: ( I use OSPF instead of EIGRP for routing between PE CE. The customer vrf name is cusA, they have 4 sites: CE from site 3 have 2 links to 2 PE ( one for backup). CE from site 3 has exist point to internet and how can i choice 1.1.1.2 is next-hop for default-route
View 2 Replies View RelatedMy 2811 is connected with two ISP,s as below and have VPN with Central branch.I want to set DSL as primary and WiMax as secondary but problem is that routes learned via BGP get precedence over default route as they are specific one.I think i may need to put all static specific routes of central branch over DSL along defautl but I want any idea if my default route stay active and when it down then BGP neighborship can be establish (like ip sla tracking.)
View 3 Replies View RelatedAs you can see i have problems with connecting 2 SRP521W together for an VPN tunnel. I tried as much as I can but now i dont know what to do or how and where is the mistake? the connection between these two devices was there last week, after weekend (nothing changed in configs) the connection suddenly was interrupted, without any reason or warning. another day it worked again and 20 mins later connection was dead again...and now it wont establish at all.. here are some screenshots from the vpnconfigs of my devices. one has a static IP the otherone uses FQDN. These are the IKE policies: Here the IPsec Policies: and the GRE policies:
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have a MPLS cloud in our data center. I want one network coming into our core router to have a different default route than the other networks coming in. I'm getting hits on the acl but the route isn't applied and goes to the default route that is configured in the router. I have other PBR for setting local-preferences and as-paths and they are working fine.
The router is a 7206 Version 12.4(11)T3
!
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.2.3.4
!
ip access-list extended 2nd_Default_Route
[Code].....
I have a Cisco 2960 ( WS-C2960-8TC-S) running 12.2(46)SE C2960-LANLITEK9-M image.I would like to set an ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 87.101.156.97 but the current image does not allow.Will ip default-gateway 87.101.156.97 work or do I need ip routing ?The ISP has provided a /30 address and we are using an additional /29 for our network devices. I dont think this image can be upgraded. I need to forward routes directly out to ISP. [code]
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe have a Nexus 7010 running version 6.1(2).
I'd like to use IP SLAs and object tracking to define static routes for specific source/destination traffic across some WAN links we have. I've done this in IOS and it's worked fantastically, but I've not found where/how to do this on the Nexus 7010 platform (or any Nexus platform) as of yet. I could have sworn that this was going to be introduced in the 6.x code? Below is an example of how we do this in the IOS world:
track 11 ip sla 1 reachability
delay down 15 up 15
ip sla 1
[Code]....
Esentially this gives us the option of using a "failover" default route. I've attached a basic diagram to explain what we are trying to do with IP SLAs and object checking. The tracking should be configured against an SLA that uses icmp and the static routes should be configured against the tracking.
IP SLA configuration fails over but cannot ping the 4.2.2.2 via Site B. Here is the output on Cisco 3750...
SW2#show runBuilding configuration...
Current configuration : 2901 bytes!version 12.2no service padservice timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname SW2!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!!!!no aaa
[Code].....
I'm working on a little OSPF setup in my lab and having a problem pinging out to the internet.I have a setup with (3) 3550's running ip routing. I'm configuring OSPF but I can't ping the internet from any L3 switch except the switch with the actual uplink to the internet.[code] From SW2 and SW3, I can ping SW1 on all IPs (192.168.1.90, 10.10.10.1, 10.10.10.5) but I can't ping 192.168.1.1 which is my gateway to the internet.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have Cisco 7200vxr doing BGP with 2 directly connected ISP's over ethernet. I am receiving default routes only, and have added a higher weight to my routes learned from my primary ISP. below is my configuration (ip addresses changed of course)
router bgp 100 no synchronization bgp router-id x.x.x.x bgp log-neighbor-changes network 100.100.64.0 mask 255.255.254.0 network 100.100.71.0 network 100.100.78.0 mask 255.255.254.0
neighbor <ISP_A-IP> remote-as 200 neighbor <ISP_A-IP> weight 175 neighbor <ISP_B-IP> remote-as 300 neighbor <ISP_B-IP> weight 150 auto-summary
Advertising my rotues to the primary ISP is fine
7206vxr.rb#sh ip bgp neighbors <ISP_A-IP> advertised-routesBGP table version is 7, local router ID is x.x.x.xStatus codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S StaleOrigin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path*> 100.100.64.0/23 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i*> 100.100.71.0 100.100.64.57 0 32768 i*> 100.100.78.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
Total number of prefixes 3
However, advertisements to the secondary ISP inlcludes the defautl route learned from the primary 7206vxr.rb#sh ip bgp neighbors <ISP_B-IP> advertised-routes BGP table version is 7, local router ID is x.x.x.x Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 0.0.0.0 <ISP_A-IP> *> 100.100.64.0/23 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i*> 100.100.71.0 100.100.64.57 0 32768 i*> 100.100.78.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
Should I not just only be advertising just the networks that i specified in my configuration?