In EIGRP, if a router loses the successor to a route, and it has no FS, it goes active (starts asking all neighbors if they have a successor for that route).But if the neighbor did have a successor, shouldn't they have pro-actively told us about it when they learned it (so we already have it as the Feasible Successor?).
View 6 Replies
I config the routers with EIGRP and also write Static route between two PC before remove the link between router0 and router1 , destination is reachable , but when remove this connection , packet from pc1 to pc0 will drop in a loop and never reach to destination , is it possible to have a Link state routing protocol and static route at the same network like this scenario , how to prevent loop in this topology static route is configure as bellow :
router0 <==> router 1 <==> router2 <==> router3 <==> router <==>pc1
We have problem con EIGRP and two ASR 1001 in High Availability. ASR2 have received all route (100 route) from PE, but in ASR1 doesnt received all route (75 route) from PE or from other ASR02. All PE have all route. The ASR1 when modify or lost some route dont update to the ASA. see diagram.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have an ASA 5520 connected to a Cisco 6509E, and we're turning up EIGRP between the two. The problem that I'm running into is that there a few static routes (including a 0.0.0.0) on the core that's being redistributed into the EIGRP AS, and I need to block this from being propagated to the ASA. The ASA only has the capability to use an ACL in conjunction with a distribute-list, and I can't find a way to filter the default route (0.0.0.0 /0), while allowing everything else.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a customer with a primary datacenter and DR datacenter, that has a P2P 100Mbps link connection between them. At the primary Datacenter there will be a Nexus 5596U with a L3 card running EIGRP, it will have three connections, one nothbound to the Internet not a problem, the other is north bound to an MPLS SP managed ISR router. Both datacenters will have MPLS SP managed ISR router, the MPLS service provider will be redistributing BGP into EIGRP from their ISR routers at both datacenters. This means we will learn external EIGRP routes with an AD of 170.
Connected to my 5596 southbound will be the SAN for the EMC storage traffic, the DR also has a SAN with EMC storage as well. The 100Mbps P2P link is primarily for replication traffic.
Since the Nexus 5596U with L3 module doesn't support PBR I have to figure a way for replication traffic to prefer the 100Mbps P2P link vs the MPLS cloud. I was thinking of running iBGP over the P2P link with the Nexus 5596 being a route reflector and it's iBGP peer which will be a Catalyst 3750X at the other end of the P2P link being the route-reflector client. That way both iBGP peers will exchanged learned routes.
I have to come up with a way for the replication traffic that comes sourced from the IP addresses of the EMC/storage to prefer the P2P link which will have an AD of 200 from iBGP in the routing table vs the external EIGRP traffic that has an AD of 170 in the routing table. All other traffic will route normally across the MPLS cloud. All other traffic will include client server traffic as there are application servers that sit south bound of the Nexus 5596, the client traffic will come inbound to the datacenter via the MPLS cloud.
I don't have a Nexus 5596 to do a mock lab. My thought is to redistributed connected with a route-map in EIGRP on the Nexus 5596 with a two match statements then set the IP next hop to the IP of the 3750X. I would need to select only replication traffic, so I was thinking if I can match on vlan and next-hop then my set command would be the next-hop of the 3750X.
I have a mixed WAN environment with both eBGP and EIGRP routes. The BGP routes should always take precedence, when they exist. If no BGP routes exist I want the router to fail over to using the EIGRP routes. So far, this works fine.
The problem is, when the BGP route again becomes available (and the associated entry appears in the "sh ip bgp ... received-routes" output) the router is NOT relinquishing the EIGRP route. It remains in effect, showing as a "D" route int the route table even though there is a better ("B") route available. If I bounce EIGRP or the interface associated with it, the EIGRP route disappears and the BGP route reasserts itself, and everything will run correctly until the next time the BGP route disappears due to maintenance, line failure, etc.
My router is (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.3(1)T
Here's the associated config
interface Tunnel101
description VPN backup WAN interface
bandwidth 7168
ip address 192.168.75.1 255.255.255.0
[code].....
I have a 3750 at a branch running EIGRP connected to two routers that both have configured:
access-list 1 deny 0.0.0.0
access-list 1 permit any
access-list 2 permit 0.0.0.0
access-list 2 deny any
router eigrp 1distribute-list 1 out FastEthernet0/0distribute-list 2 in FastEthernet0/0
Due to this recently applied config the switch become unreachable from the outside and cannot ping anything. Everything connected to it works fine. I was able to remote into it from a switch behind it and noticed that the 3750 has no default route in the routing table. I do see a default route in the eigrp topology table. How to make the switch learn a default route maintaining the existing configuration on the routers.
I'm trying to create a route-map for an EIGRP Distribute list on a N7K, the goal is to not advertise a 10.0.0.0/8 and 172.31.30.20/32 networks out a link to a remote site while permitting all other traffic to the internet (default). I configured the ACL/route-maps below and applied them outbound on the N7K interface but no subnets at all are being received on the remote site router.
ip access-list DENY_10.0.0.0
10 permit ip any 10.244.244.20/30 <<--WAN interface network
20 deny ip any 10.0.0.0/8
25 deny ip any 172.31.30.20/32
30 permit ip any any
[code]....
I'm attempting to redistribute a static route into EIGRP on a 3750 switch and pass it to an upstream router, sadly however this isn't working, or at least the route isn't being recieved on the upstream router. [code]
View 10 Replies View RelatedWe are deploying a new office in the building next to our main office. The main office has a Cisco ASA 5510 behind that is a Cisco 3750 stack. In the new office we are deploying a new Cisco 3750, they will be connected via fiber cable. I have sliced off VLAN 800 as a transit link /30 with an address space of 10.249.249.1-4. The new 3750 only has two VLAN's 800 and 112 (10.112.0.0/24). VLAN 112 routes are advertised to the neighboring 3750 properly as seen in the routing tables of the 3750 stack:
D 10.112.0.0/24 [90/3072] via 10.249.249.2, 00:22:24, Vlan800
Traffic passes between all local VLANS with no issue. I found in order to get packets to pass between the ASA and the new 3750 I had to add a static route to the ASA:
S 10.112.0.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via 10.100.0.1, inside
My question is why is EIGRP not advertising the 10.112.0.0 network to the ASA. Here are EIGRP configs on the switches
Existing 3750 Stack
router eigrp 100
network 10.0.0.0
redistribute static
[code]....
Is it possible to track a IPSLA operation and if it goes down track a static route which will be removed from EIGRP process. I have read through documentation and have come stuck. I have the below configured and have shown the features installed. How would I go about getting the below static route injected into EIGRP only if the IPSLA operation in ok?
track RMB
type rtr 100 reachability
ipsla
[Code]....
I have an issue with my setup of a 6500 switch (12.2(33)SXI9).We have a 6500 switch with several VRF's. For a certain VRF I would like to redistribute a static route in EIGRP. After doing so I don't see the static route on my eigrp neighbor.
This is a overview of my config. I'm basically redistributing only my static route for this vrf in eigrp.
I found a similar case in which the solution was adding a metric to the static route. (eg. redistribute static route-map static-eigrp-pp metric 10000 100 255 1 1500). But the strange thing is that we don't have this issue on a similar machine (same IOS, same config setup). [code]
this is a Nexus 5596 L3 with the latest code:
It looks like the deny statement is not working as I can see all routes I am redistributing. I even did a deny on a specific route and I still see it in the routing table on another router in the autonomous system.The same below works fine on IOS platform. [code]
i have a strange issue with an HSRP Setup. I have two (S1+S2) 3560 as Core/Distribution Layer. Inter-vlan routing are enabled on both Switches. S1 and S2 are connected with an ether channel over four fibre ports. S3 -S5 are the (L2) access layer.
Gi0/1 on S1 and S2 are L3 ports, connect to a Linux Firewall.
HSRP is enabled, S1 is the active router and the STP root bridge.
But, my monitoring via cacti show me, that the Gi0/1 on S2 is active, too! But it should not be active? Only if S1 fails, should S2 the active switch.A client from the access ports on S3 - 5 gets traffic from the Internet via Gi0/1 from S2. Gi0/1 on S1 is active too, but will send mostly traffic to the Internet. Why is S2 active and why route it traffic from the Internet to the client?
I am working on a network which has two ISP connections (Active/Active) terminating on router (ASR1000). From the LAN side (6500 switch) all the traffic need to be route on ISP1 but some of the specific subnets like 10.250.0.0/16 need to be route on ISP2 connection.
I am planning to use PBR and NAT with route maps. any documents or refrences are provided.
(access switches)---------(core switch)----------(routers)----------------(ISP1)
----------------------(ISP2)
I have a pair of ASA 5520s operating in failover pair as active/standby, having two contexts on them. I am planning to share the load and make it active/active making first context active on the primary unit and second context active on the secondary unit. My question is if this will disrupt any connectivity thru these firewalls when I do "no failover" on the active/standby and assign the contexts to different failover groups and enable the failover back.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am looking at deploying a pair of 5585X's in an active/active multiple context state. I am creating Mulitple contexts that need to be able to route to each other. I was going to deploy a type of Gateway context that has a shared interface to all of the other contexts, instead of sharing interfaces directly between the contexts, i beleive this will work as basically i am just cascadng the contexts and sharing interfaces.
The main problem i have come across, is that if i deploy active/active across two appliances using 2 failover groups i can not see a way to route between them, for example.
I have Context 1, Context 2 and Context GW A including the shared interfaces of Con1 and Con2 in failover group 1 on appliance A with the respective standbys on Appliance 2. I have Context 2, Context 4 and Context GW B including the shared interfaces of Con 3 and Con 4 in failover group 2 on appliance B with the respective standbys on Appliance 1.
I need to be able to route traffic between Context GW A and GW B so that the contexts can communicate in normal operation and in failover. I do not beleive that I can share an interface between contexts in two separate failover groups and to be honest without adding a L3 device between the appliances i am not sure if this is possible.
I have two ASA 5510s running in Active/Active mode. I need to make config changes on them. How do I go about it? Do I power off the secondary ASA and make the config changes on the primary and then power on the secondary ASA ? Or this another way to do this?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have an ASA5520 in location A with an ISP connection and a matching ASA5520 in location B with a separate ISP connection. We have fiber connecting the two locations and vlans passing back and forth so I will be able to configure the failover via a vlan as well as extend the ISP's to each location via vlans. The Active/Active configuration with the multiple security contexts does not seem to be an issue but how is a redundant ISP configured in this mode?We want to have context A using the ASA in location A with ISP1 as the primary and failing over to ISP 2 in locaiton B We also want to have context B using the ASA in location B with ISP 2 as the primary and failing over to ISP1 in location A Would route tracking provide the desired result? Is there a better option?
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe 6509 Series Switches support the scenario VSS Active-Active Chassis, I would like to setup both switch's as one virtual switch but working at the same time, not with Active - Stand By Chassis.
My plans it to create PortChannel accross both Switches 6509 in order to have 2 links one connected to one slot/switch and the other connected to slot/switch in the second 6509 for servers redundancy.
I faced one problem in our core switch 4507 R . Active sup lost connection and standby came active. We got lot of errors/alerts on console shown below. [Code] Also when I reloaded the switch with reload command only both sups got reloaded but I want to reload all the modules but reload command do not gives any options for that.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have 2 asa 5520 firewalls including and 1 AIP-SSM-10 module in each of them. the configuration is set using active/active failover and context mode.
Both of them run individualy the IPS module. The IPS is configured using inline mode and fail-open option. However when one of the module fails and the state is changing from up to init or anything else making the IPS to fail then failover is detected and ASA consider it as failover and bounce context to the other unit.
IPS soft is 6.0(4) and ASA soft is 8.0(3)
I have checked cisco doc and it is confusing to me. it says: "The AIP-SSM does not participate in stateful failover if stateful failover is configured on the ASA failover pair." but it really does participate. Running is not really an option because of production network impact matter..
We have an Active/Active ASA 5520 setup, as i know in Active/Active setup there is no remote VPN access, So i could overcome this limitations?I have a solution but i dont know if it is ablecable or not? we have a spare ASA 5510, so i can use it behind Active/Active Firewalls and assign a public static NAT IP address to it and open all IPSEC and VPN ports and let the remote users to connect to it, is this ablecable setup or not?
View 1 Replies View Relatedits possible to set up active/active failover using etherchannel on 5585s?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow to Configure ASA5520 for Active/Active
View 8 Replies View Relatedour application team is mandating, that the solution we should come up with for SLB, should support Active/Active mode of SLB operation.
My question, is this mode of operation supported/accredited by Cisco, and what is the draw back from the traditional active/standby.
My Cisco 861 wireless router (CISCO861W-GN-E-K9) don't support EIGRP. What will I do to enable it?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have software router vyatta and about 15 branches with cisco 881w and cisco 1941. All branches have 10mbs bandwidth and 3 of them have 50mbs. Link to vyatta has 100mbs bandwidth and situated in datacenter.All branches connect to vyatta via vpn site-to-site with ipsec.I want to change vyatta to cisco router or asa.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI need to configure BGP on our 7204 and 2811 router. The 7204 is our main router and currently running EIGRP internally. Our remote locations just moved to an MPLS connectivity and they have a 2811 router. I will need to configure BGP for the routing protocol. I have the AS number and the remote AS number. Attached is the the current configuration of the two routers.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI currently have a d-link DIR-615E3 with the latest dd-wrt firmware (v24 from 2010-12-13). Everything seems to be ok when I boot up the router - with factory settings and unsecured wireless, I have an internet connection. When I enter the GUI, create a router username/password, everything is still fine. Then, when I create a wireless security password (WPA2 personal) I lose internet connection, and the only way to get it back is to do a hard reset of the router. This also happens if I change any setting within the ddwrt interface, not just the wireless settings. (I also have a linksys WRT54GL with ddwrt with absolutely no problems) My cable modem is a motorola surfboard SB5101U, ISP is comcast cable, running windows 7.
View 6 Replies View Relateddoes a router Cisco 887 va k9 support EIGRP and IPsec ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedNetwork was:
AT&T Broadband ISP
LanCity LC-PET3 cable modem (non DOCSIS)
Linsys 4 port hub
2 Win98SE PCs
All worked fine
New network is: Same as above, with a Linksys 1 port router (BFSR11) between the cable modem and the hub.
Router is configured to be a DHCP server (default configuration).
I assigned the router a custom WAN side MAC to match one of my two PCs to avoid having to call AT&T to get things running.
Results: Everything runs perfectly fine initially, but after leaving and coming back to either system (left on, in standby) after quite a while (going to work / bed), the network connection is dead.
WINIPCFG still reports the same IP, but seems to hang forever if I attempt to release / renew. The router's is unreachable for configuration / status (it's still on the default IP of 192.168.1.1) Pressing the reset button on the back of the router restores the internet connection (quickly too - I'm back online in about 15 seconds).
Entering standby manually and coming back out again after just a couple minutes does not affect the internet connection - it seems to only occur when I'm off for an extended period of time. I have no had the time to determine what the period of time is, and if it is a fixed time since DHCP lease / initial startup, or if it is a fixed amount of inactivity time (or maybe even not a fixed amount of time at all).
When ever my roommates and I turn on or turn off a computer or device to log onto our wireless network that computer or device and all other computers or devices that are on the network lose internet connection for about 3 minutes. After that period then all devices gain access back. We have a Cisco Linksys router, Model number WRT110, it is the Range Plus version. I got it 6 months ago from a friend that had never pulled it out of the box or used it. I used it before moving and it did not have this problem. We are using cable for our internet and have a Motorola Surfboard model number SB5101U for our Modem. We have 2 Dell computers, both about a year old, and a LG blue ray device that connects wirelessly to stream movies
View 4 Replies View Related
