Cisco Firewall :: 1841 To Hold Public IP Addresses Behind ASA
Apr 21, 2013
I am trying to figure out how this works. I have an ISP device that connects to my 1841. ISP and fa0/0 hold the /30 WAN addresses. Fa0/1 hold one of the public IPs, lets say 1.1.1.1/29. Then the outside interface of the ASA holds 1.1.1.2/29. Now I have two routes in the 1841, one for default route going back to the ISP device, and a route for the 1.1.1.0/29 network going to the ASA.Now I have 4 more publics I can use 1.1.1.3 - 6. I do not want to assign these IPs to the servers, but yet just NAT them. I know this is possible, but cant figureI took an internal host and did a one to one static NAT from private to public. Packet tracer says my NAT rules are ok. Allowed all IP traffic for testing and still can't ping the server.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 29, 2012
I just bought an SA520 to replace my existing FW.
The thing is that I have private IP adresses on my LAN, and I have been issued a public IP network for my DMZ by my ISP.
Meaning I want to NAT my LAN but not my DMZ, but I can't seem to find a way in the 520 to do that. I can only find the oprion to turn off NAT all together.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 8, 2011
Is it possible to two or more public IP Addresses bound to a Cisco ASA 5505 running 8.4(2).
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2013
How can I hold the public IP on my cisco client VPN NAT session so nobody else can use it? I have a cisco asas 5510 inside is 172.10.20.86 public 166.245.192.90
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2012
How can I hold the public IP on my cisco client VPN NAT session so nobody else can use it? I have a cisco asas 5510 inside is 172.10.20.86 public 166.245.192.90
Did I need to call my ISP?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 2, 2010
I'm currently replacing my ASA 5505 with a 5510. I have a range of public IP addresses, one has been assigned to the outside interface by the setup wizard (e.g. 123.123.123.124 ) and another I would like to NAT to an internal server (e.g 192.168.0.3 > 123.123.123.125). On my asa 5505 this seemed fairly straigh forward, i.e. create an incoming access rule that allowed SMTP to 123.123.123.125 and then create a static nat to translate 192.168.0.3 to 123.123.123.125. Since I've tried to do the same on the 5510 traffic is not passing through so I'm assuming that the use of additional public IP addresses is not handled in the same way as the 5505? I also see that by default on the 5505, 2 VLANs are created, one for the inside and one for the outside, where as this is not the case on the 5510. Is the problem that VLANs or sub-interfaces need to be created first? I'm doing the config via ASDM.
Everything else seems to OK i.e. access to ASDM via 123.123.123.124, outbound PAT and the site-to-site VPN.
View 15 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2009
I have 1841, 2800 and 3800 routers and need to do IOS upgrade to all of them. Existing routers do not have enough flash to hold 2 IOS images.if the router has 12.4.13r ROM IOS, will I be able to boot the ISR router via Cisco brand USB? That means in case something goes wrong while I am uploading new IOS to the router via WAN and something wrong, now router in ROMMON mode. If a local site person has a Cisco USB with an IOS in it, can he just stick it to the router and reboot the router and router will go out of rommon and go into normal mode? After it is working, then I can put the running IOS onto the exisitng CF card so now I can remove the USB and the CF card has a good IOS and reboot the router again.I am just trying to find a safe way to upgrade the site when they don't have big enough flash to hold 2 IOS at the same time. The local person is not technical so asking him to setup tftp server and put the IOS in the computer and so I can do tftpdnld while in rommon mode to grab the IOS from his tftp will be difficult to have the local person to set it up.
If ISR can boot off of the IOS in USB only, then I assume the requiremetn is the ROM IOS needs to be 12.4.13r. Then what is a safe way to upgrade the ROM IOS to this then? I never upgrade ROM IOS before so don't know what kind of problem I may run into and whether it's higher risk to upgrade this than upgrading the regular ios? If it is, then all my routers won't have this ROM IOS version, so that means I can't use USB to boot then? Will that means I am down to tftp server option? ( I heard xmodem won't work as it will time out before the ios can load via the slow dialup link into the router to rescue it from rommon mode).
View 33 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2012
i am using a Cisco 1841 with subinterfaces instead (NAT on a stick).From the internet i can access services on public IP being hosted in LAN2. But when i try to access the same services on the same public IPs but sitting on LAN1, it does not work.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2012
i am using a Cisco 1841 with subinterfaces instead (NAT on a stick).From the internet i can access services on public IP being hosted in LAN2. But when i try to access the same services on the same public IPs but sitting on LAN1, it does not work.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 28, 2011
I have a request to establish a site to site VPN with a customer. While collecting the information I give them our local network subnet which is a private subnet (192.168.5.0). They asked me if I could give them a public address instead. They can not work with the 192.168.5 subnet. Is this possible?
My side of the VPN is an ASA 5505 running 8.2(2). The other side i believe is a Checkpoint.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2011
Is it possible to have more public addresses to more internal addressees? I have an internet provider which is in control of my router and he is telling me it is not possible. It's a Cisco router and I have static IP address.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 23, 2011
I would like to configure an 877w I just bought. It's connecting to a UK ADSL2+ link.I'm a penetration tester and I want to put the Cisco router in front of my existing firewall which has an IPS on it, so that it doesn't get in the way of port scans and vulnerability scans. My ISP has issued me with 14 usable addresses a/240 subnet and basically I want to be able to use the route with just the public IP addresses. I have configured Cisco routers before, but never with this type of configuration. It's always been single public IP address NAT'd through to one or two internal LAN's.
It will be nice if I could assign the wireless and fast ethernet ports to the same VLAN using the public addresses. I don't want to use DHCP I'm quite happy statically assigning IP addresses to the computers wireless and LAN interfaces. I am reasonably certain this is possible because not sure how to do it and a little busy at the moment carrying out penetration tests.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2012
i have Cisco 1941(with security lic) and i have been asked to make a VPN with public IP addresses so there will be no info about internal networks. Other side has ASA 5520 and they provided me with 2 public IP addresses. i have done many different VPNs but this is first with public IP addresses and i cannot figure it out.So here is the question:
1. How to do it ? (maybe some example)
2. Do i need two public IPs to do it ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2013
If there are any small business routers that offer one-to-one NAT? I have several public IP addresses assigned to me by CenturyLink. I have two servers that provide email and web hosting for two different domains. I want to put the client machines on one VLAN (VLAN Z) and assign it a public IP address (to keep server traffic separate). I want to put each server on its own VLAN (VLANs X & Y) and assign each server its own public IP address. I need the router to be able to provide a firewall and port forwarding for each VLAN. I also need to be able to route traffic between VLANs so the clients on VLAN Z can access their email and the websites on VLANs X and Y. I also need to be able to route DNS traffic between VLANs so each server can provide name resolution for their respective domains.
So, is this possible with a small business router or do I need to look at something different? I'm fairly certain this configuration is not possible with my current Cisco RVS4000. What it boils down to is I need a router that is capable of having multiple public IP addresses on the same interface and to forward those public addresses to private VLAN subnets. This would be one-to-one NAT if I understand it correctly..
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2012
The client has a Cisco RVS4000. There are 3 Internet devices need to be accessed from the outside and will use one public IP for one device. I don't see any options to setup on Cisco RVS4000 to do 3 NATs. If Cisco RVS4000 doesn't work in this situation, which router will do?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2011
I have a customer thats got a Linksys router now, that has a DMZ port.The DMZ port is configurede to it routes the extra public ip-adress to the DMZ port it has.At the DMZ port they have another router connected, where they routes the public ip-adresses på some other devices.How can i make this setup on a Cisco ASA 5505 (With the Security Plus licens)What i have to do is to replace the Linksys router, and make it so, so it works like it was before with the Linksys.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2011
I just thought if it's possible to make sure that only approved IP addresses for each of divisions of a company can be used.How can I assign for a port one/more public addresses and be sure that only this port is using it/them. Thing is I have only one 24 bit public Network ID provided to me by ISP. One IP address of the range is used for ISP's gateway. So I have 253 addresses to be distributed among divisions. However to avoid IP address conflicts I have to be sure that only dedicated for a division IP address/es is/are used by the division.
Router is 2821.
Switch is 2950.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2011
I have this motorola sbv5121e modem. I can connect one PC to it directly. When I try to connect a secont PC, via a switch, it won't give out 2 IP addresses. Moreover, I see that the one IP address it does give out, is a public one (like 22.x.x.x). I'm on XP and show the addresses with ipconfig. Is this modem defective hardware-wise, or is some setting internally wrong? How can I see what the DHCP server does?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2012
Is it possible to have multiple public IP addresses that are from different subnets going through one router? I have been told that this is not possible with most routers and that I would have to spend a lot of money on a router to be able to do it. I am still not totally clear on what defines a subnet even after reading up on them. What I am trying to achieve:
-My office has 10 computers.
-All would be connected to one router.
-My internet service provider has provided me with 10 public IP addresses, that are all very varied (which I asked for)
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2011
I have a customer that has an RSV4000 Router. The customer has also purchased a block of 5 usable public IP addresses. I need to be able to assign these public IP addresses to printers either by configuring a static IP on each printer directly or thru IP mapping or some other method. Does the RSV4000 support using multiple public IP addresses and if so what configuration is needed in the router for the printers to be seen by the outside world.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 26, 2011
I have set up a private domain network at home. I have a domain controller, a DNS server, and a DHCP server all running on one Windows 2003 Server machine. I have about 10 other machines around the house, getting their IP addresses from this DHCP server.
I have a Netgear WNDR3700 router.
I am about to get 5 public IP addresses from my ISP, and I would like to make some of these machines publicly accessible (while still accessible from the other machines in the network).
I found this link that says on my web server (one of the public machines), that I should use a second NIC and set that up to connect to my router (and get a private IP address from my DHCP server).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2012
On an 887VA running 15.x IOS, is there a way to support both public and private addresses on inside vlans? The outside interface is public static ip, so the requirement would be to not nat anything if coming from inside vlan10 but nat if coming from inside vlan20.I didn't think this was possible since the outside interface would have to use an outside nat command that would not be ignored for traffic coming from vlan10.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2012
I got 1 public IP for router and 16 Public IP's for NAT from ISP. Both router IP in one range and the NAT IP's are in different range. I want to use 1 NAT public IP for one of my windows server.Am using cisco 1841 router, in which I ve configured the public IP provided by the ISP for router.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2011
I have a Netgear ProSafe VPN Firewall FVX538. But I also have 10 Public IP Addresses that I will like to setup for three web services. So how do I set this up. With multiple routers. Or can my Netgear FVX538 take multiple Public IP Addresses to the same ports. If not how can setup multiple routers. one being the main one.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 8, 2012
I'm really bad on networking so I have a question about NAT. I got two public IP addresses from my ISP: 92.x.x.252 - 92.x.x.254. 92.x.x.254 is configured as secondary on external interface and clients will use it two connect (vpn) it from outside through cisco 1841 to zywall p1 with wan ip address 92.x.x.253. Is this configuration (look at picture) allowed? How can I route traffic from 92.x.x.254 to zywall p1, if posible?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2012
Am having an issue with my cisco 1841. I recently brought some IP Publics. Now that i need them i just can't use them, I don't know much about routers but till now have successfully manage to do some stuffs with the router after googling ,OK we already have some other ip publics and when i look at the config file i can see something like this:
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2011
I've got an existing Cisco 1841 connecting to a 10Mbps Internet Leased line. With my current setup I've configured PAT for internet access for my users, and we also have some servers on site which are assigned public ip addresses, these can be accessed from the internet. Now we have procured a Cisco 1921 ISR to replace the old 1841, when I connect the 1921 with an identical configuration in place of the old router, 2 things happen.
1) The users accessing the net via the nat are able to work without any inconvenience (good)
2) My servers which have public IP addresses are unable to reach the internet and subsequently I am unable to reach them via the internet (very bad)
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 9, 2012
This is existing network diagram and find attached file for configuration of Router and L3 Switch:ISP provided 6 Mbps internet access link with ethernet Handoff which is terminated over Cisco 1841.ISP also provided pool of 30 Public ip's 125.63.74.33 /27 , range from 125.63.74.34 to 125.63.74.62.In my current setup, all Inside to ouside traffic going out through 125.63.74.34 public ip because this public-ip NAT overload with Router F0/1 interface.
1) I want to divide 6 Mbps link physically into three parts 2Mbps, 2Mbps, 2Mbps for three VLANs.
2) I want to also configure each vlan IN/OUT traffic with different Public ip. is it possible or not ?
Vlan2 = 172.25.162.0 /24 => Inside to outside / Outside to inside traffic through 125.63.74.40
Vlan3 = 172.25.163.0 /24 => Inside to outside / Outside to inside traffic through 125.63.74.41
Vlan4 = 172.25 164.0 /24 => Inside to outside / Outside to inside traffic through 125.63.74.42
How can i configure above desired setup with CBWFQ
View 23 Replies
View Related
Jul 10, 2011
i have an ASA 5520 8.4(1) setup as follows
public wan
|
|
ASA-- public dmz
|
|
private lan
i need to allow https traffic to a server in the DMZ that will have a routable IP address will just an ACL suffice ?which interface do i apply it to ? wan or dmz ?i dont need a NAT since the DMZ is a routable space?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2012
New to the ASA 5505 8.4 software version, but here is what I'm trying to do:
-Single static public IP: 16.2.3.4
-Need to PAT several ports to three separate servers behind firewall
-One server houses email, pptp server, ftp server and web services: 10.1.20.91
-One server houses drac management (port 445): 10.1.20.92
-One server is the IP phone server using a range of ports: 10.1.20.156
Basically, need to PAT the ports associated with each server to the respective servers behind the ASA 5505. Is anything missing from this config? Do I need to include a global policy for PPTP and SMTP? [code]
View 11 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2012
The other day I set up a firewall on my Cisco 1841 router, it all seems to work fine except for a few small problems. 2 wireless devices an iPhone and an Android tablet are having some problems with 1 or 2 apps. iPhone 6.0.1 Facebook app and the App store will not load Android tablet ICS BBC iPlayer and Google play app store wont load or play content. Both devices with their issue were working fine until the new firewall was installed. I’ve tried opening ports and adding ACLs but nothing seems to work. I’ve included my start up config. All other PCs, laptops, smartphones and iPads work fine.
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5551 bytes
!
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
[code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 3, 2013
I have a cisco 1841 router , and i want to configure zone based firewall on it. But the document of zone based firewall only said that "after 12.4(6)T" can support zone based firewall. I use the ios " c1841-ipbasek9-mz.124-15.T9.bin ", but it can't support ZFW. What kind of ios support ZFW. for example: ipbase, ent base, ip service ,advent etc.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2012
In setup for old RV042 (V1), when updating / adding Mac addresses, the table is always sorted by IP addresses. But in the new oneRV042 (V3) I have, even with latest firmware 4.2.1.02 the list is random, thereby increasing the chance of user entering DUPLICATE IP addr with diff Mac addr. That will result in conflict.If the firmware sorts the DHCP entries by ip addresses, user would be able to catch duplicate ip errors even if the system does not flag the errors. All Cisco smart engineers can you all get the dhcp entries SORT by ip addresses.
View 2 Replies
View Related
