Cisco WAN :: Multiple Public IP Addresses On 877W
Nov 23, 2011
I would like to configure an 877w I just bought. It's connecting to a UK ADSL2+ link.I'm a penetration tester and I want to put the Cisco router in front of my existing firewall which has an IPS on it, so that it doesn't get in the way of port scans and vulnerability scans. My ISP has issued me with 14 usable addresses a/240 subnet and basically I want to be able to use the route with just the public IP addresses. I have configured Cisco routers before, but never with this type of configuration. It's always been single public IP address NAT'd through to one or two internal LAN's.
It will be nice if I could assign the wireless and fast ethernet ports to the same VLAN using the public addresses. I don't want to use DHCP I'm quite happy statically assigning IP addresses to the computers wireless and LAN interfaces. I am reasonably certain this is possible because not sure how to do it and a little busy at the moment carrying out penetration tests.
View 7 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 20, 2012
Is it possible to have multiple public IP addresses that are from different subnets going through one router? I have been told that this is not possible with most routers and that I would have to spend a lot of money on a router to be able to do it. I am still not totally clear on what defines a subnet even after reading up on them. What I am trying to achieve:
-My office has 10 computers.
-All would be connected to one router.
-My internet service provider has provided me with 10 public IP addresses, that are all very varied (which I asked for)
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2013
If there are any small business routers that offer one-to-one NAT? I have several public IP addresses assigned to me by CenturyLink. I have two servers that provide email and web hosting for two different domains. I want to put the client machines on one VLAN (VLAN Z) and assign it a public IP address (to keep server traffic separate). I want to put each server on its own VLAN (VLANs X & Y) and assign each server its own public IP address. I need the router to be able to provide a firewall and port forwarding for each VLAN. I also need to be able to route traffic between VLANs so the clients on VLAN Z can access their email and the websites on VLANs X and Y. I also need to be able to route DNS traffic between VLANs so each server can provide name resolution for their respective domains.
So, is this possible with a small business router or do I need to look at something different? I'm fairly certain this configuration is not possible with my current Cisco RVS4000. What it boils down to is I need a router that is capable of having multiple public IP addresses on the same interface and to forward those public addresses to private VLAN subnets. This would be one-to-one NAT if I understand it correctly..
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2012
The client has a Cisco RVS4000. There are 3 Internet devices need to be accessed from the outside and will use one public IP for one device. I don't see any options to setup on Cisco RVS4000 to do 3 NATs. If Cisco RVS4000 doesn't work in this situation, which router will do?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 8, 2011
Is it possible to two or more public IP Addresses bound to a Cisco ASA 5505 running 8.4(2).
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2011
I have a customer that has an RSV4000 Router. The customer has also purchased a block of 5 usable public IP addresses. I need to be able to assign these public IP addresses to printers either by configuring a static IP on each printer directly or thru IP mapping or some other method. Does the RSV4000 support using multiple public IP addresses and if so what configuration is needed in the router for the printers to be seen by the outside world.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 2, 2010
I'm currently replacing my ASA 5505 with a 5510. I have a range of public IP addresses, one has been assigned to the outside interface by the setup wizard (e.g. 123.123.123.124 ) and another I would like to NAT to an internal server (e.g 192.168.0.3 > 123.123.123.125). On my asa 5505 this seemed fairly straigh forward, i.e. create an incoming access rule that allowed SMTP to 123.123.123.125 and then create a static nat to translate 192.168.0.3 to 123.123.123.125. Since I've tried to do the same on the 5510 traffic is not passing through so I'm assuming that the use of additional public IP addresses is not handled in the same way as the 5505? I also see that by default on the 5505, 2 VLANs are created, one for the inside and one for the outside, where as this is not the case on the 5510. Is the problem that VLANs or sub-interfaces need to be created first? I'm doing the config via ASDM.
Everything else seems to OK i.e. access to ASDM via 123.123.123.124, outbound PAT and the site-to-site VPN.
View 15 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2011
I have a Netgear ProSafe VPN Firewall FVX538. But I also have 10 Public IP Addresses that I will like to setup for three web services. So how do I set this up. With multiple routers. Or can my Netgear FVX538 take multiple Public IP Addresses to the same ports. If not how can setup multiple routers. one being the main one.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2011
I have a Cisco 877W-K9 router, and I for the life of me can not work out how to enable multiple SSIDs on the AP whilst keeping them all to the same VLAN?
I know this may seem silly but basically for our clients we setup WPA-Enterprise for one SSID and WPA-PSK for the other to help ease migration between the two etc, however all I can seem to do at the moment is create multiple VLANs and use ip unnumbered vlan1 to sync them all into one, but this seems really silly.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2013
Is there any way to have my Cisco 877W Router alter from using one static route to another static route when another router on the network is reporting destination host unreachable?
Router 1 (192.168.2.253)
Dialer0 -> ppoe to internet
Vlan1 -> local 192.168.2.0/24
Router 2 (192.168.2.254)
Dialer0 -> ppoe to managed VPN (172.16.28.1)
Vlan1 -> local 192.168.2.0/24
Router 2 is connected to another network through a managed VPN and that network also has internet access. I want to be able to have two routes to the internet on Router 2. And when Router 1 internet goes down packets get routed through the VPN instead.
I currently have on Router 2
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.253
ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Dialer0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.28.5 250
Which does nothing when Router 1 has its Dialer0 interface shutdown, or goes offline completely.I suspect I could reverse the setup and have everything routed through the VPN by default and then if / when Dialer0 interface goes down it would switch to using Router 2, but if the problem is in the remote network and interface Dialer0 stays up, it would probably do the same thing... nothing.All devices mentioned are Cisco 877W routers with ADSL and a bunch of fast ethernet interfaces.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2011
Is it possible to have more public addresses to more internal addressees? I have an internet provider which is in control of my router and he is telling me it is not possible. It's a Cisco router and I have static IP address.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2012
i have Cisco 1941(with security lic) and i have been asked to make a VPN with public IP addresses so there will be no info about internal networks. Other side has ASA 5520 and they provided me with 2 public IP addresses. i have done many different VPNs but this is first with public IP addresses and i cannot figure it out.So here is the question:
1. How to do it ? (maybe some example)
2. Do i need two public IPs to do it ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 29, 2012
I just bought an SA520 to replace my existing FW.
The thing is that I have private IP adresses on my LAN, and I have been issued a public IP network for my DMZ by my ISP.
Meaning I want to NAT my LAN but not my DMZ, but I can't seem to find a way in the 520 to do that. I can only find the oprion to turn off NAT all together.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 21, 2013
I am trying to figure out how this works. I have an ISP device that connects to my 1841. ISP and fa0/0 hold the /30 WAN addresses. Fa0/1 hold one of the public IPs, lets say 1.1.1.1/29. Then the outside interface of the ASA holds 1.1.1.2/29. Now I have two routes in the 1841, one for default route going back to the ISP device, and a route for the 1.1.1.0/29 network going to the ASA.Now I have 4 more publics I can use 1.1.1.3 - 6. I do not want to assign these IPs to the servers, but yet just NAT them. I know this is possible, but cant figureI took an internal host and did a one to one static NAT from private to public. Packet tracer says my NAT rules are ok. Allowed all IP traffic for testing and still can't ping the server.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2011
I have a customer thats got a Linksys router now, that has a DMZ port.The DMZ port is configurede to it routes the extra public ip-adress to the DMZ port it has.At the DMZ port they have another router connected, where they routes the public ip-adresses på some other devices.How can i make this setup on a Cisco ASA 5505 (With the Security Plus licens)What i have to do is to replace the Linksys router, and make it so, so it works like it was before with the Linksys.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2011
I just thought if it's possible to make sure that only approved IP addresses for each of divisions of a company can be used.How can I assign for a port one/more public addresses and be sure that only this port is using it/them. Thing is I have only one 24 bit public Network ID provided to me by ISP. One IP address of the range is used for ISP's gateway. So I have 253 addresses to be distributed among divisions. However to avoid IP address conflicts I have to be sure that only dedicated for a division IP address/es is/are used by the division.
Router is 2821.
Switch is 2950.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2011
I have this motorola sbv5121e modem. I can connect one PC to it directly. When I try to connect a secont PC, via a switch, it won't give out 2 IP addresses. Moreover, I see that the one IP address it does give out, is a public one (like 22.x.x.x). I'm on XP and show the addresses with ipconfig. Is this modem defective hardware-wise, or is some setting internally wrong? How can I see what the DHCP server does?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 26, 2011
I have set up a private domain network at home. I have a domain controller, a DNS server, and a DHCP server all running on one Windows 2003 Server machine. I have about 10 other machines around the house, getting their IP addresses from this DHCP server.
I have a Netgear WNDR3700 router.
I am about to get 5 public IP addresses from my ISP, and I would like to make some of these machines publicly accessible (while still accessible from the other machines in the network).
I found this link that says on my web server (one of the public machines), that I should use a second NIC and set that up to connect to my router (and get a private IP address from my DHCP server).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2012
On an 887VA running 15.x IOS, is there a way to support both public and private addresses on inside vlans? The outside interface is public static ip, so the requirement would be to not nat anything if coming from inside vlan10 but nat if coming from inside vlan20.I didn't think this was possible since the outside interface would have to use an outside nat command that would not be ignored for traffic coming from vlan10.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2011
I have an unusual deployment scenario which may require the use of a SRP-521W, the scenario is as follows:Temporary Setup:Cisco 857 As the ADSL router until Ethernet Hand-off is installedMultiple IP addresses delivered on the ADSL WAN serviceCisco 857 put into Bridge Mode and connected to SRP-521W WAN portCisco 521W handles the Authentication and RoutingCheck Point Firewall System connected to SRP-521W LAN-1Check Point Firewall has WAN IP 203.XXX.XXX.XXXCisco UC-540W Connected to SRP-521W LAN-2Cisco UC-540W has WAN IP 203.XX.XX.XX If you understand the above scenario, I am curious if this can be done and if so how? I need to keep the networks totaly separate and the only thing they would have in common is the Cisco SRP-521W.It should also be noted that the SRP-521W Is being used because the ADSL service is only temporary whilst the Fibre Build is completed and the carrier provides an Ethernet Hand-Off, then the Internet service will change to this type of presentation and the ADSL router will be relegated to the dark world of loneliness.I have gone through the router and have been playing around with the settings, the issue Is I have nothing in the LAB work up that can allow me to replicate this environment and test it before deployment... So, how to reduce the amount of trail and error I have to encounter to get it to work.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 5, 2011
I have just installed an SRP 527w and it's basic operation is working fine. However, the ISP has allocated (and set up routing for) a range of 16 additional static addresses to the link that I now wish to configure and use, but I am having problems. Details are as follows (ip addresses are fictitious): [code]Extra ip range Netmask: 255.255.255.240From what I understand, these are added as subinterfaces which are bridged off the main WAN interface. However, when I try to add a subinterface by specifying (say) I get an error when saving : [code] The error states "IP Address and Gateway cannot be the same as the netmask".
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 6, 2011
We have Cisco ASA 5505 box.We have a /29 subnet available.At this moment one of IP addresses in this rage is assigned to VLAN2 used for outside interface all outgoing traffic from VLAN10 (for employees) will go out using one IP, xxx.xxx.xxx.1all outgoing traffic from VLAN20 (for visitors) will go out using second IP, xxx.xxx.xxx.2all outgoing traffic from VLAN10 host yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy (mail server, webmail, ...) will go out using third IP, xxx.xxx.xxx.3all specified incomming traffic to xxx.xxx.xxx.3 will be NATted to internal host yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy in VLAN10 .The main purpose is to have specific public IP address for mail server only not to get to any black list,and to give visitors different outgoing IP address than for our internal users.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2012
configuring my Cisco 2951 router with Z0ne-based firewall. This is the scenario I would like to configure.
I have two ftp servers,S1 and S2, behind the router which needs to be accessed by two groups of users, G1 and G2, from the outside, i.e., from the internet.
I have two public IP addresses, 152.12.164.203 and 152.12.164.204. The WAN interface of the router is configured with IP address 152.12.164.203. G1 needs to access S1 on 152.12.164.203 and G2 needs to access S2 on 152.12.164.204.
What are the steps in configuring the router if I need the above scenario to be implemented?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2012
I need to put a few cameras, without a server, on a static WAN ip address. Do I just assign them a static LAN ip address(for example 192.168.1.200), make sure the port they use is open, then type the WAN static ip address then colon and the last address? Like this.....I'm making up the WAN address....45.34.55.334:200
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2012
I've currently got my ASA (5505) serving a /28 public subnet. I've ran out of IPs, so my DC has issued me an additional /24 subnet that they have routed to my ASA. What needs to be done on my ASA so be able to use these new addresses? I've been trying to search and not been able to find a good answer (some say I shouldn't have to do anything, everything else references NATing, which I currently don't do and would rather not do).The servers I assign these to, I'd like them to have the public ip assigned directly to them.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 20, 2012
I've replaced my dead ASA5505 with a 861-K9.Our ISP provides a subnet of public address /29 (wan side) by example: 200.200.200.xxx /29,we have 3 servers (lan side) in the example 10.1.1.xxx /24 is the same case than Johnatan, the only difference are the public addresses. [URL], everything is ok when NAT via the FE4 public address, but when do the same with other public IPs doesn't work.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2011
For a branch office we have an ASA5505 connected to the ISP with an DHCP provided public IP "locked" to the local MAC This works ok!Now - the ISP may provide up to 5 public IP's (all DHCP assigned).Is it possible to configure 2-5 public interfaces in the ASA?? As IP's are DHCP assigned there must be something (a interface) to request the address.Would this be possible, and if so - what license would be required??NAT routing on the inside should be possible as well.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 18, 2011
I've got an ASA which has a number of contexts. They all share the same external interface, and in the interest of saving addresses I'm wondering if the standby address for each context is really necessary. I know that in active/passive the standby address is what allows the two to communicate and monitor that particular interface, however, in active/active I don't see the point as the context is either going to be on one or the other.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2012
We have just setup a new RV042G firewall. The customer has multiple public IP addresses and we need to allow RDP access for at least 2 of the Public IP addresses. I only see a way to open ports for the one IP assisgned to the WAN. I temporarily did a one to one NAT for the second public IP to NAT to the private IP but that pretty much opens everything which is not ideal from a security standpoint. How can we setup multiple IP addresses on this firewall?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 9, 2012
I would like to create two site-to-site VPNs, one for data and one for VoIP, between the same sites. One end is an ASA 5510 and the other is a third party firewall. Is this possible if I use different sets of IP addresses for each tunnel?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2013
Today I was having a conversation with my Cisco Academy teacher from a few years back, and we couldn't figure this out.I am getting an internet connection via Verizon FiOS. Instead of giving me an ISR, they're going to just give me an ethernet cable. Here's what I want to do with it.
This cable is going to be plugged into a 1900 series router. Connect to that will be a 48 port switch. Connected to that will be multiple servers to be used for web hosting, email, databases, etc. My ISP is providing me with 13 public addresses, however, it is not my own unique subnet.
Here comes the question; how would I set this up? The way I was originally thinking was to assign one IP to fa0/0, a second to fa0/1, and then assign the fa0/1 address as the default gateways for all the hosts on the inside. But then I realized that it won't let me have the same network on 2 ports.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2013
I have ASA 5520 with Ver 8.2.Outside interface is directly connected to ISP's router(TelePacific) and is assigned one of public IP:198.24.210.226.There are two servers inside the network with the private IP's:192.168.1.20 for DB Server, and 192.168.1.91 for Web Server.I did Static NAT 198.24.210.226 to 192.168.1.20 and 198.24.210.227 to 192.168.1.91.When I access DB Server(198.24.210.226) it's working OK but when I access Web Server(198.24.210.227) there is no response at all.I checked the inside traffic, it even did not get into the firewall.Is this the problem with ISP's router? How can we route all of our public IP's to the outside interface(198.24.210.226)?
interface GigabitEthernet0/1nameif insideip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0security-level 100no shutdown
interface GigabitEthernet0/0nameif outsideip address 198.24.210.226
[Code].....
View 9 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2013
I have three public IP:s from /24 network like 83.x.x.10, 83.x.x.25 and 83.x.x.41 all using netmask 255.255.255.0.
I'm using 83.x.x.10 on ASA outside interface and trying to do static nat for inside servers with those other IP:s, but not yet solved it.
Using Cisco ASA 5505 software v9.02
Config:
object network obj_guest
nat (guest,outside) dynamic interface
object network obj_any
nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface
object network w2008
host 192.168.1.10
[code]....
This works other networks that are like whole network with /29 mask and have router in front of ASA using bridge. But in my case i just have DSL modem bridged in front of ASA. This static nat works like should if i use like Zywall USG series fw and this same configuration works in my customers, but they have those scenarios i said having mask /29 and router in front...
It seems that the problem is in ASA, like i won't show those public IP:s to public router from my operator. Because if i roll those other public IP:s on my ASA:s outside interface: i will use 83.x.x.25 and 83.x.x.41 on outside interface and after that put back my original 83.x.x.10 then my static nat is working just fine, atleast few hours, but not in next morning because ISP router flushes ARP cache.
View 4 Replies
View Related
