I just bought an SA520 to replace my existing FW.
The thing is that I have private IP adresses on my LAN, and I have been issued a public IP network for my DMZ by my ISP.
Meaning I want to NAT my LAN but not my DMZ, but I can't seem to find a way in the 520 to do that. I can only find the oprion to turn off NAT all together.
I am trying to figure out how this works. I have an ISP device that connects to my 1841. ISP and fa0/0 hold the /30 WAN addresses. Fa0/1 hold one of the public IPs, lets say 1.1.1.1/29. Then the outside interface of the ASA holds 1.1.1.2/29. Now I have two routes in the 1841, one for default route going back to the ISP device, and a route for the 1.1.1.0/29 network going to the ASA.Now I have 4 more publics I can use 1.1.1.3 - 6. I do not want to assign these IPs to the servers, but yet just NAT them. I know this is possible, but cant figureI took an internal host and did a one to one static NAT from private to public. Packet tracer says my NAT rules are ok. Allowed all IP traffic for testing and still can't ping the server.
View 3 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to two or more public IP Addresses bound to a Cisco ASA 5505 running 8.4(2).
View 9 Replies View RelatedI'm currently replacing my ASA 5505 with a 5510. I have a range of public IP addresses, one has been assigned to the outside interface by the setup wizard (e.g. 123.123.123.124 ) and another I would like to NAT to an internal server (e.g 192.168.0.3 > 123.123.123.125). On my asa 5505 this seemed fairly straigh forward, i.e. create an incoming access rule that allowed SMTP to 123.123.123.125 and then create a static nat to translate 192.168.0.3 to 123.123.123.125. Since I've tried to do the same on the 5510 traffic is not passing through so I'm assuming that the use of additional public IP addresses is not handled in the same way as the 5505? I also see that by default on the 5505, 2 VLANs are created, one for the inside and one for the outside, where as this is not the case on the 5510. Is the problem that VLANs or sub-interfaces need to be created first? I'm doing the config via ASDM.
Everything else seems to OK i.e. access to ASDM via 123.123.123.124, outbound PAT and the site-to-site VPN.
I have a request to establish a site to site VPN with a customer. While collecting the information I give them our local network subnet which is a private subnet (192.168.5.0). They asked me if I could give them a public address instead. They can not work with the 192.168.5 subnet. Is this possible?
My side of the VPN is an ASA 5505 running 8.2(2). The other side i believe is a Checkpoint.
Is it possible to have more public addresses to more internal addressees? I have an internet provider which is in control of my router and he is telling me it is not possible. It's a Cisco router and I have static IP address.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI would like to configure an 877w I just bought. It's connecting to a UK ADSL2+ link.I'm a penetration tester and I want to put the Cisco router in front of my existing firewall which has an IPS on it, so that it doesn't get in the way of port scans and vulnerability scans. My ISP has issued me with 14 usable addresses a/240 subnet and basically I want to be able to use the route with just the public IP addresses. I have configured Cisco routers before, but never with this type of configuration. It's always been single public IP address NAT'd through to one or two internal LAN's.
It will be nice if I could assign the wireless and fast ethernet ports to the same VLAN using the public addresses. I don't want to use DHCP I'm quite happy statically assigning IP addresses to the computers wireless and LAN interfaces. I am reasonably certain this is possible because not sure how to do it and a little busy at the moment carrying out penetration tests.
i have Cisco 1941(with security lic) and i have been asked to make a VPN with public IP addresses so there will be no info about internal networks. Other side has ASA 5520 and they provided me with 2 public IP addresses. i have done many different VPNs but this is first with public IP addresses and i cannot figure it out.So here is the question:
1. How to do it ? (maybe some example)
2. Do i need two public IPs to do it ?
If there are any small business routers that offer one-to-one NAT? I have several public IP addresses assigned to me by CenturyLink. I have two servers that provide email and web hosting for two different domains. I want to put the client machines on one VLAN (VLAN Z) and assign it a public IP address (to keep server traffic separate). I want to put each server on its own VLAN (VLANs X & Y) and assign each server its own public IP address. I need the router to be able to provide a firewall and port forwarding for each VLAN. I also need to be able to route traffic between VLANs so the clients on VLAN Z can access their email and the websites on VLANs X and Y. I also need to be able to route DNS traffic between VLANs so each server can provide name resolution for their respective domains.
So, is this possible with a small business router or do I need to look at something different? I'm fairly certain this configuration is not possible with my current Cisco RVS4000. What it boils down to is I need a router that is capable of having multiple public IP addresses on the same interface and to forward those public addresses to private VLAN subnets. This would be one-to-one NAT if I understand it correctly..
The client has a Cisco RVS4000. There are 3 Internet devices need to be accessed from the outside and will use one public IP for one device. I don't see any options to setup on Cisco RVS4000 to do 3 NATs. If Cisco RVS4000 doesn't work in this situation, which router will do?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a customer thats got a Linksys router now, that has a DMZ port.The DMZ port is configurede to it routes the extra public ip-adress to the DMZ port it has.At the DMZ port they have another router connected, where they routes the public ip-adresses på some other devices.How can i make this setup on a Cisco ASA 5505 (With the Security Plus licens)What i have to do is to replace the Linksys router, and make it so, so it works like it was before with the Linksys.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI just thought if it's possible to make sure that only approved IP addresses for each of divisions of a company can be used.How can I assign for a port one/more public addresses and be sure that only this port is using it/them. Thing is I have only one 24 bit public Network ID provided to me by ISP. One IP address of the range is used for ISP's gateway. So I have 253 addresses to be distributed among divisions. However to avoid IP address conflicts I have to be sure that only dedicated for a division IP address/es is/are used by the division.
Router is 2821.
Switch is 2950.
I have this motorola sbv5121e modem. I can connect one PC to it directly. When I try to connect a secont PC, via a switch, it won't give out 2 IP addresses. Moreover, I see that the one IP address it does give out, is a public one (like 22.x.x.x). I'm on XP and show the addresses with ipconfig. Is this modem defective hardware-wise, or is some setting internally wrong? How can I see what the DHCP server does?
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to have multiple public IP addresses that are from different subnets going through one router? I have been told that this is not possible with most routers and that I would have to spend a lot of money on a router to be able to do it. I am still not totally clear on what defines a subnet even after reading up on them. What I am trying to achieve:
-My office has 10 computers.
-All would be connected to one router.
-My internet service provider has provided me with 10 public IP addresses, that are all very varied (which I asked for)
I have a customer that has an RSV4000 Router. The customer has also purchased a block of 5 usable public IP addresses. I need to be able to assign these public IP addresses to printers either by configuring a static IP on each printer directly or thru IP mapping or some other method. Does the RSV4000 support using multiple public IP addresses and if so what configuration is needed in the router for the printers to be seen by the outside world.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have set up a private domain network at home. I have a domain controller, a DNS server, and a DHCP server all running on one Windows 2003 Server machine. I have about 10 other machines around the house, getting their IP addresses from this DHCP server.
I have a Netgear WNDR3700 router.
I am about to get 5 public IP addresses from my ISP, and I would like to make some of these machines publicly accessible (while still accessible from the other machines in the network).
I found this link that says on my web server (one of the public machines), that I should use a second NIC and set that up to connect to my router (and get a private IP address from my DHCP server).
On an 887VA running 15.x IOS, is there a way to support both public and private addresses on inside vlans? The outside interface is public static ip, so the requirement would be to not nat anything if coming from inside vlan10 but nat if coming from inside vlan20.I didn't think this was possible since the outside interface would have to use an outside nat command that would not be ignored for traffic coming from vlan10.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a Netgear ProSafe VPN Firewall FVX538. But I also have 10 Public IP Addresses that I will like to setup for three web services. So how do I set this up. With multiple routers. Or can my Netgear FVX538 take multiple Public IP Addresses to the same ports. If not how can setup multiple routers. one being the main one.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow do you convert a pix501 configuration to use on a sa520? I do not know how to use a GUI, I am a cli guy. Can a pix501 config be used on a sa520?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an SA520 that is being used as a front end firewall. Behind it I have an IP PBX. The VOIP provides are registered and I can make outgoing calls. However It appears that the SA520 is either blocking or not routing the calls. I have opened the ports recommended by both the IP PBX and the VOIP provider. What do I need to do to make incoming calls through the SA520?
View 1 Replies View Relatedi have an ASA 5520 8.4(1) setup as follows
public wan
|
|
ASA-- public dmz
|
|
private lan
i need to allow https traffic to a server in the DMZ that will have a routable IP address will just an ACL suffice ?which interface do i apply it to ? wan or dmz ?i dont need a NAT since the DMZ is a routable space?
I am new to Cisco products. We have currently got a Netgear FVX538 running in front of a few servers. We currently have 2 ranges of IP addresses provided to us on 2 separate subnets. We configured the netgear box with the first IP addresses of each subnet as the IP address of each of the primary and secondary LANs. This then allowed us to set the gateway addresses of servers on the network to either of those 2 addresses, depending on it's range.
This all worked fine - except for the fact that the Netgear box is incredibly flakey, so we decided to get a Cisco box.
We have gone for the SA520, which I have been trying to configure this afternoon. Unfortunately I am now having concerns as to whether it is possible to configure 2 separate subnets internally on this box in the same way we have done with the netgear box. ie - classical routing, one incoming WAN interface with multiple subnets?
New to the ASA 5505 8.4 software version, but here is what I'm trying to do:
-Single static public IP: 16.2.3.4
-Need to PAT several ports to three separate servers behind firewall
-One server houses email, pptp server, ftp server and web services: 10.1.20.91
-One server houses drac management (port 445): 10.1.20.92
-One server is the IP phone server using a range of ports: 10.1.20.156
Basically, need to PAT the ports associated with each server to the respective servers behind the ASA 5505. Is anything missing from this config? Do I need to include a global policy for PPTP and SMTP? [code]
In setup for old RV042 (V1), when updating / adding Mac addresses, the table is always sorted by IP addresses. But in the new oneRV042 (V3) I have, even with latest firmware 4.2.1.02 the list is random, thereby increasing the chance of user entering DUPLICATE IP addr with diff Mac addr. That will result in conflict.If the firmware sorts the DHCP entries by ip addresses, user would be able to catch duplicate ip errors even if the system does not flag the errors. All Cisco smart engineers can you all get the dhcp entries SORT by ip addresses.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a client that has 6 public IP addresses. He needs to use 3 of them. One for workstations which is currently working fine. It is using the default gateway IP. One for a email/web server which has a statis NAT and is also working fine. But we need an additional NAT but it is for 3 servers that all need to go out as the smae public IP. I am not sure and been unsuccessful getting those to go out as the same IP. I either cannot get them to exit the same IP or it breaks the workstation NAT.
Workstations would be 10.0.0.100 - 200 going oput the FE1 interface or I think x.x.94.122
Email would be 10.0.0.5 going out the statis NAT of x.x.94.123
I then need 10.0.0.2 - 4 to go out x.x.94.124
I removed some ACLs and IP info for security. Attached is the current config.
interface FastEthernet0
description $ETH-WAN$$FW_OUTSIDE$
ip address x.x.4.240 255.255.255.0
[Code]....
I'm trying to get a new 5505 installed in our network to replace the 1841 that died over the past few days (memory issues). One of the big pieces of functionality that the old router gave us was the ability to open certain ports to the outside world to let clients see web sites we were working on for them or let employees RDP in to their work machines. I'm having trouble getting that working properly with the new device.
After a lot of trial and error, I finally got some ports working, but only for some IP addresses. In theory, Comcast (our ISP) is routing 13 IP addresses to our device (a.b.c.177 through 189). For historical reasons, the external IP of the device is .178. Only those NAT entries for .177, .178 and .179 are currently working. I've attached the configuration of the ASA, as well as the configuration of the old 1841. As far as I know, Comcast's equipment is doing its job, so I don't have a lot of reason to question that end of it. And it was working with the 1841 in place before its untimely demise.
One note - I am also having trouble getting the VPNs working, so they are a work in progress. That will account for some of the differences in the configs.
We are going to setup a L2L VPN with a vendor and they asked us to NAT a couple IP addresses for remote access to a couple of servers on our inside network. Our device is an ASA 5580 with version 8.1 and we have a handfull of public IP addresses for use if needed. The vendor's remote network is a public IP address but for this posting I will use 192.168.10.0. Our inside servers are 10.100.10.20 and 10.100.10.30. Because 10.100.10 is in use with another customer they asked us to NAT 10.77.97.20 and 10.77.97.30 to the two inside servers.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI configure the virtual MAC address for a interface on ASA 5520, will enter the following command on the active unit:
failover mac address Inside 0012.3456.789a 0023.4567.89ab
The active MAC address is of the same as the Inside's burned-in MAC address of the active unit.Similarly, the standby MAC address is of the same as the Inside's burned-in MAC address of the standby unit.Do I get the effect of failover mac address command?
I have an ASA5510 running version 8.4. ICMP is blocked from the internet to the outside interface of our firewall but now our ISP is requesting us to allow ICMP from their network to the outside of our ASA. I need to allow ICMP from three blocks of IP Addresses?
View 9 Replies View Relatedtrying to configure our ASA 5505 (hence my request for the ASDM). However, I can go CLI if push comes to shove.
What I'm trying to do is allow a range of IP addresses on the inside interface (those which the DHCP server is doling out IPs which are XXX.X.XXX.14-140) to access email only (which is hosted offsite). They still need to access the file servers which are on the inside but nothing should be going out to the internet other than email.
I believe I have to create a Network Object which contains the IP range I wish to restrict. I can see where I add the Network Object but I don't know what the syntax should be to specify the address range.
I'm also not sure what the sequence of the ACLs should be and whether or not I can keep the default Access Rules in place. There are the two implicit rules: 1) Permit any traffic out to less secure networks 2) Deny any traffic to anywhere (which is superceded by rule 1, yes?)
To create an Access Rule like the one I desire, do I need to move the two existing rules down the list so that the new one will supercede both implicit rules?
So in the past from 8.2 down I had one to one NATs like so
static (inside,outside) A.A.A.A B.B.B.B netmask 255.255.255.255
but for 9.1 im running now I need to do this
object network obj-B.B.B.B
host B.B.B.B
nat (inside,outside) static A.A.A.A
So if I make an ACL to permit outside public access to the public IP (A.A.A.A) in 9.1 do I use real B.B.B.B ip address or the object itself obj-B.B.B.B?
1. how do I nat a public address to a dmz address.
2. how do I open port 80/443 in the public to this address?
Is it possible to NAT source & destination addresses (twice nat) on an ASA5520 running 7.2(5)?
View 4 Replies View Related