So in the past from 8.2 down I had one to one NATs like so
static (inside,outside) A.A.A.A B.B.B.B netmask 255.255.255.255
but for 9.1 im running now I need to do this
object network obj-B.B.B.B
host B.B.B.B
nat (inside,outside) static A.A.A.A
So if I make an ACL to permit outside public access to the public IP (A.A.A.A) in 9.1 do I use real B.B.B.B ip address or the object itself obj-B.B.B.B?
My boss would like to know if there is a way to find out the ip address of a person VPN ing into our network. Let's say Joe Smith is VPNed in from home and his carrier is cox communications. How would I go about finding out what his ip address (the ip issued to him by cox) is? Is that even possible? If it is possible, is there a way to create a list of ip addresses of everyone that has ever VPN ed into our network? We are using a Cisco ASA 5520 and Cisco VPN Client.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI need to know the maximum number of MAC addresses that can be entered in to the MAC security filter list on the AP541N.I know it has a maximum number of 200 concurrent users, however the documentation does not specifiy whether this also applies to the MAC filter.
I have used wireless acces points in the past that allow hundreds of users but only allow 64 MAC addresses, so this is very important.
I have a question about access-lists on ASA: (5520 running 8.4)Often I want to permit all traffic from networks behind an interface (let's say DMZ in this example) to Internet, but NOT to internal networks. Then I first configure a Deny from DMZ to all internal network and then a Permit to ANY. If I forget the first Deny I will allow all traffic also to my internal networks. Is it possible to configure an access-list that permit all traffic from a network to all networks that are reachable via a given interface? In this example: Permit all traffic from DMZ to all networks that are reachable via the Outside-interface? This should permit traffic to Internet and deny traffic to internal networks in one statement.If I specify the outside-interface as the destination only traffic to the interface itself will be allowed.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am having a problem getting this to work and I have always done it with 2 Static ip address. but now this company changed to 1 and I am doing something wrong.
I have comcast with 1 static IP, I have a local LAN with 6 host and 1 server that does Mail and remote access and web traffic.
I need a config that allows me to use 1 static ip on the outside interface of the PIX and allow with an ACL 7 ports open to the server and allow all the local host out to the internet.
Find list of all the MAC address of the devices connected to the router?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a router in front of a few firewalls on an internet link. All traffic from the inside network must go through one of the firewalls to get out through the router and similarly there is a dmz on one of the firewalls.I am trying to make sure the router is fully hardened.Should I apply an access list on the outside interface of the router along with the access list for management access?
View 11 Replies View RelatedTrying to figure this all out. I'm getting untranslated hits. I posted the config I have so far.
Code...
This is a working example using static. But it doesn't work with the dynamic interface or I'm doing something wrong. Need to get rdp access to my laptop.
ASA Version 8.4(5)6
!
hostname ciscoasa
enable password 8Ry2YjIyt7RRXU24 encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
[code]...
I need to configure the access list on the outbound internet port to accept the following:
ip access list 10
access-list 10 permit PPTP vpn any xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
access-list 10 permit RDP any xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
access-list 10 permit FTP any xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
access-list 10 permit Postgresql any xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
access-list 10 permit MacARD any xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
This method does not work on the Cisco 2921 router with FW
On firewall we have zone created for dmz and ip is 192.x.x.x and it is connected to 2950 switch(DMZ switch) with vlan 25..We have L3 switch on this we have created vlan 25 and connected cable from L3 with 2950 switch with vlan 25
As we have the servers on L3 and wanted to bring on dmz zone we have connected a cable.Now the problem is when i connect a pc on 2950 switch (directly on dmz switch) with access-list below we are not geeting any hist on it.
I have a Wireless N router model F5D8236-4 v2 (01) with firmware 2.00.04 (Nov 12 2008 10:51:08) and it's not showing all issued wireless or Wired IP addresses in DHCP Client List.
They all have IP addresses and connect to the internet through the router, but in the router administration page, they're not listing. The Windows devices all show but most of the Mac devices are not, nor is my XBox 360.
My reason for investigating this is because the router seems to keep losing the Mac devices and a router reboot fixes it, but it shouldn't have this problem because all the Windows devices just seem to work.
According to the support page I have the latest available (dated November 12, 2008 which really seems kinda old to me for a Wireless N router). Are there any plans for a new firmware offering for this modem or have you already deprecated it as "legacy equipment"?
How to designate access-list for the remote access vpn users in order to let them access specific subnet or host,asa 5510 and acs is in the picture
View 9 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to configure an extended access list on one AS5350XM but I get one way hearing on a voice calls and I can't determine why (please see the attached diagram). There is an OSPF running on both gigabit interfaces and the Loopback address is also advertised (it is actually the voip IP address). The access list is applied on both interfaces in the inbound direction. There is another gateway with IP:4.4.4.4 (no firewalls here) and the routing between gateways is working properly.
Here is part of the access list (applied on AS5350):
.
.
permit ip host 4.4.4.4 host 3.3.3.3
.
.
When I review the log of the AS5350xm I see many errors like this one:
%SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list example denied udp 3.3.3.3(16638) -> 4.4.4.4(18094), 1 packet
So how it is possible to see this error since the access list is in inbound direction and the IP address (4.4.4.4) is open. I don't have problems when I do telnet or ssh from 3.3.3.3 to 4.4.4.4.
I am unable to remove an access list. Currently this this access list contains 4 lines of remarks. I was unsure if I was entering the command correctly and now I have 4 lines of "trash" that needs to be removed.
Symptoms:
The "sh run" command shows that I have access-list 100 defined.
The "sh access-list" returns nothing.
Process I have tried: config t
no access-list 100
no access-list remark Test (just trying anything at this point)
clear configure access-list 100 (This returns "Invalid input detected at '^' marker" and the '^' is under the 'e' in clear.)
So the "clear configure" command is not working. The "no access-list" commands does not return an error but does not remove anything.
What step am I missing? Let me know if I can provide any more information.
ASA 5505 vlans routing & access-list?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have just upgraded a ASA5510 from 8.2 to 8.3 using migration tool.All seemed to go well, still double checking the config as this is a bench test of upgrade prior to filed upgrades.
Anyway one thing that is slightly frustrating is that the migration has expanded all of my access-lists, so we maybe had 10 lines of config relating to access-lists based on access-groups, now we have hundreds of lines.On ASDM this is bad enough but on CLI with show run its a bit of a bind.
Is there any way to un-expand the access list or do I simply delete and start again using my access groups.
I'm trying to add an access-list rule to allow internal servers to connect an outside host on a asa 5540. The hostname translates to multiple ip's. Normally I just lookup the ip address or one of the ip's the hostname translates too and use that in the access-list as the host. For some reason the actual ip's, which are a few, are not always available so using a specific ip sometimes does not work, thus the reason I have to use the hostname instead of the ip. I have 2 hostnames. www.hostname.com and subdomain.hostname.com.
This is how I normally add these rules (the ip addresses are fictive): access-list internet_access extended permit tcp host 192.168.50.5 host 84.115.57.121 eq www log
When I try to add this using the hostname on our asa I get an error: access-list internet_access extended permit tcp host 192.168.50.5 host www.hostname.com ?ERROR: % Unrecognized command
I've tried it without the 'www', so hostname.com but same error.
I have very strange behaviour on my Cisco 2801 router when I applied access list on wan interface.
Architecture:
SIP Provider <----> Cisco 2801 <-----> CUCM 6
Problem:
We are using Cisco 2801 as Voice gateway for CUCM 6. so only one purpose of this router is just receiving calls on sip dial-peer and transfering to internal network.
If you look on access list below, if 'log' words don't present on these 2 lines, access list didn't work. Problem with it is that when I establish call from us or to us I can't hear incomming RPT stream, but other side can hear me. But when I type word 'log' there, everything stars working immediately.
Cisco 2801 IOS version:
Cisco IOS Software, 2801 Software (C2801-ADVENTERPRISEK9_IVS-M), Version 12.4(6)T9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
[Code].....
I created some acess-lists, and you can assign a logging level to this access-list. Now this ACL has a lot of hits, so i want to see whats happening. Only the log I then see is completely empty. I cannot figure out how to get some info in that log.
I think there is some global logging setting i probably need to enable in order to get anything logged at all, but i cannot figure out which.
I am troubleshooting a s2s vpn between an ISR871 and my ASA5520 and I suspect a problem with my crypto-maps.
Is there a way I can display an access-list on the ASA and have the object names substituted with their IP addresses?
One of my Clients just aquired a CISCO ASA firewall, and they would like to restrict internet access, that is they want to block internet for Junior employees while managemnet remains connected, Looking at the situation, The ASA serves as the gateway,I tried an Access list like below for one pc to test if it works but instead everyone just went off, may be i misfired somehwere.
Access-list 110 deny tcp any host 192.168.20.100 eq wwwAccess-list 110 deny tcp any host 192.168.20.100 eq 443Access-list 110 permit tcp any any eq wwwAccess-list 110 permit tcp any any eq 443access-group 110 in interface inside
I am trying to remove a line in a particular access-list configured in a FWSM module using this command "no access-list <acl> line 19 x x x x" but it doesn't work. See below:
FWSM/xxx03(config)# no access-list ?
configure mode commands/options:
alert-interval Specify the alert interval for generating syslog message
106001 which alerts that the system has reached a deny
[code]...
How can I remove a line from the access-list without clearing the entire access-list?
I'm configuring a 5505 for a remote office. Until they are assigned a static ip by the provider I will have to use the providers dhcp address. How do I construct an access list for the outside interface using the external address if I don't know it yet? is there a commnd that will insert the ip address in to the access list once one is assigned?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have 3 3560 switches which are configured with trunks between them. They run vlan 10, 11 & 12. I have a 'core' switch (switch 1) of these 3 to which an MPLS router is connected on vlan12. I in addition have another switch hanging off the 'core' switch via a routed link (switch 4). I have EIGRP configured as a stub and as such the IP address on the routed link at the core switch end is of a /24 from v lan 1 on the other switch. This makes the route directly connected and therefore distributed via EIGRP stubs. Switch 1 is then exchanging routes with the MPLS router (via EIGRP).
The problem I have is that from any sub net on any switch (switch 1, 2 or 3) I can ping 192.168.13.1 (switch 4). When I try and ping switch 4 from over the MPLS I am unable to. If I trace to the switch I see it reaches the outside of the MPLS router, but is then unresponsive. The same applies if I try to ping switch 1 on 192.168.13.2. Any of the other IP addresses of switch 1 respond.
The MPLS network is a managed solution to which I have no access. I'm told that the MPLS provider is able to ping switch 1 & switch 4 on the 192.168.13.x addresses from a remote router (192.168.32.2). I have tried from a switch on the same L2 sub net (192.168.32.1) and I don't get a response.
From switch 4 I am able to ping the switch on 1 of it's interfaces (192.168.19.1), but not the interface I mentioned above 192.168.32.1. There are no access lists in place on the switches and no firewalls between the sites.
I have an ASA pair configured to replace a router that hosts a collection of IPSec Tunnels. Tunnels appear to work. I am lab'ing some additional controls that I would like to implement. On the Production Router that i plan to replace with the ASA's the current Tunnels are all wide open (all traffic allowed to pass). I was hoping to lock things down a little without having to reconfigure all of the Tunnels. My though was that an ACL on the Inside Interface blocking selected traffic Out (so into the LAN) should not impact the stability of the Tunnels but allow me to restrict some traffic from entering the LAN. One port that I was attempting to block is RDP 3389. When this ACL is applied to the inside interface it does not block Port 3389 at all. What am I missing? Is it that the trffic is being allowed because it is coming through one of my 'open' Tunnels?
Shouldn't IPSec Tunnel traffic be processed by the Inside Interface ACL just like all other traffic?
access-list 145 deny tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 3389
access-list 145 deny tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 135
access-list 145 deny tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 137
access-list 145 deny tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 138
access-list 145 deny tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 139
access-list 145 deny tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 445
access-list 145 deny tcp 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 10.187.10.0 0.0.0.255 eq 389
access-list 145 permit ip any any
ip access-group 145 out interface Internal
This work great on a 2821 Router, but not so much on the ASA.
ASA v 8.2What does the ACL hit count count ? I always thought that the acl hitcount counted the numbers of packets hitting that line in the ACL, however that is not the case. if I setup a icmp permit rule then that will only increment 1 even if I send 4 packets that hits the line. udp and tcp seems to do the same. is there some way I can make the ACL actually count the packets that hits ? where can I learn more about this ?
View 4 Replies View Relatedif ASA 8.3 uses real IP address in ACL, why in this example "ASA 8.3 and Later: Mail (SMTP) Server Access on Inside Network Configuration Example" uses the public (natted) ip address for the smtp server ACL?
View 6 Replies View Relatedin the ASA Migration Guide for Version 8.3 says about real ip address: "All of the access-listcommands used for these features are automatically migrated unless otherwise noted"
But my ACL's have not been migrated to real ip address. In my migration log:
INFO: NAT migration completed. Real IP migration logs: No ACL was changed as part of Real-ip migrationWhy?So, do I have to migrate them manually?
I have the following situation. A colleagues installed a spam block (Norton something) and he put two ip's on itsinterfaces. 192.168.2.20 and 192.68.2.21. One will be used to receive and one to send mail but both on port 25. They use a sinlge real IP 175.75.67.32. I am using a 5540 ASA with 8.2 IOS.
I am pretty sure this cannot happen but i got some advice to NAT the outgoing IP/Port and then PAT the incoming port to both IP's and it will work. I tried to do it with no success. I know that ASA 8.4 changes everything in NAT/PAT but is there any way with the newer OS my setup can work or not?
I am forced to upgrade my ASA 5520 software from 7.1 - 8.2 or higher, as I am not familiar with ASA I need expert opinions.I have following concerns regarding the upgrade.
1-Do I need to worry about the software licensing when I download 8.2
2-I read about the few difference in commands (ACL and NAT) in 8.2 what exactly I have to do here should I change the configured NAT and ACL with real IP in the existing configuration after the upgrade ?
I installed a new ASA using 8.2.2 version and ASDM 6.2.5 version in contexts mode.When i enable logging for ASDM as debugging i cannot use the real time log viewer because I have an error "Syslog connection Lost. Try restarting the syslog connection", I tried to reconnect using the icon at the bottom but nothing change.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have an issue on an ASA 5510 that I have noticed today, when I am using the log viewer all of the information recorded only shows the high end source and destination ports. For example
Source IP 10.10.4.69
Source Port 59886
Destination IP 8.8.8.8
Destination Port 59866
So what seems to be happening is that I am seeing only half of the connection in the log viewer, I see the side with the high end ports and not the side with the ports the application uses, this example was done with a ping. All my services are working correctly and the client sending the ping gets the response expected, it just seems I have lost the logging display?