Cisco Firewall :: 5510 Single Outside Public / Can PAT Out And NAT SMTP Server Back
Jul 30, 2012
I have an ASA 5510, one public IP address on my outside interface, an internal email server and a private network.I would like...
1: Users on my private network to be able to access the internet (PAT them to external outside address)
2: Email to be delivered to my MX (my single public IP address translated back to my internal email server.
i.e. can I share my single public IP address to serve translation in both directions (private users surfing the Internet (in-to-out) and an outside to inside NAT for email) ?
Email (MX) = 1.2.3.4
Public (outside) address = 1.2.3.4
Email server internal = 10.1.2.3
Internal private subnet for users = 10.0.0.0/8
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 11, 2012
I hava ASA5510. INSIDE,DMZ and OUTSIDE interfaces are configured. I hava web server on DMZ ip:10.0.0.1 and it is static natted to 1.1.1.1. From internet i can reach to web server with IP:1.1.1.1 and from INSIDE connect to web server with IP:10.0.0.1. Now i want to connect from INSIDE to WEB server via public IP(1.1.1.1).how can configure it?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2011
I've got some problem with my Mail Server since I've migrated to an ASA5510.Actually the server is in a DMZ with a private Ip ( 10.x.x.2) and it is translated to a Public IP ( 194.x.x.65).I use these configuration :
static (DMZ,LAN) 194.x.x.65 10.x.x.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 static (DMZ,LAN) 194.x.x.66 10.x.x.3 netmask 255.255.255.255 static (DMZ,WAN) 194.x.x.65 10.x.x.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 static (DMZ,WAN) 194.x.x.66 10.x.x.3 netmask 255.255.255.255 static (LAN,DMZ) 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.248.0
Some Users received in there mailbox a system administer error message :
Object : Impossible to deliver : test Your message could not be deliver to one or more of its recipients: 421 SMTP connection went away!
When they try to re sent it some times later, message is sent without problem.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2012
New to the ASA 5505 8.4 software version, but here is what I'm trying to do:
-Single static public IP: 16.2.3.4
-Need to PAT several ports to three separate servers behind firewall
-One server houses email, pptp server, ftp server and web services: 10.1.20.91
-One server houses drac management (port 445): 10.1.20.92
-One server is the IP phone server using a range of ports: 10.1.20.156
Basically, need to PAT the ports associated with each server to the respective servers behind the ASA 5505. Is anything missing from this config? Do I need to include a global policy for PPTP and SMTP? [code]
View 11 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2013
I have a ASA 5510 (ver 8.4) and I have been all over the support sites looking for what I am doing wrong. I have a sanitized cut n paste of the OBJECT, NAT, ACCESS-LIST and Packet Tracer output and it keeps failing on the NAT with a rpf-check. Once i get the SMTP flowing I have to open up HTTP and HTTPS to one of the servers also.
Here it is:
RVGW# sh run object
object network WiFi
subnet 172.17.100.0 255.255.255.0
[Code]......
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2013
I'm trying to configure a simple ACL to block smtp traffic from leaving my LAN -- basically prevent internal users from setting up internet email accounts in their email clients and sending through that smtp server. i want my Exchange server only to send smtp traffic. here's what i have:
-access-list 102 extended permit tcp host 10.10.1.29 eq smtp any eq smtp <===10.10.1.29 is Exchange
-access-list 102 extended deny tcp any eq smtp any eq smtp
-access-list 102 extended permit ip any any
-access-group 102 in interface inside
after i apply this ACL to the ASA, i am still able to send from my internet email address setup in Outlook using my "foreign" smtp server.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2012
I have an issue with my mail server(SME Server) which is behind a Cisco ASA 5500(firewall) problem is that if one leaves my network they can receive but can not send email via my SMTP also internal people can only send if they use the IP address of the server rather than the domain [URL]
here is my layout
ISP - ASA 5510 - LAN (includes mailserver)
View 7 Replies
View Related
Nov 28, 2012
We have hosted spam filter service with 3rd party vendor. My vendor is switching to different spamming services and I need to add ip address lets say 44.33.454.32 to the list of allowed system that can connect to my smtp service. I am going over my firewall 5510 configs and I think I need add the entry like this: “access-list outside-to-inside extended permit tcp object-group obj-44.33.454.32 interface outside eq smtp”. [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2012
We have a 5510 (8.2) with the following 4 interfaces (security-levels) inside (95), outside(0), dmz(25), and test (95). The dmz network is 10.10.10.0/24 and the outside interface is 40.133.84.69.We have run into a situation where a dmz hosted iRedMail server running postfix (10.10.10.51) is relaying mail which in some cases points back to us at 40.133.84.69 and into our Exchange server. In these cases in the dmz server's mail logs we see postfix timeout trying to connect to smtp at 40.133.84.69. When I try to telnet from 10.10.10.51 to the outside interface on port 25 it times out.We've tried different ways to allow the outside adapter to permit smtp (or any service!) from 10.10.10.51 but we're left scratching out heads.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 5, 2012
how to go about setting up the ASA to block any SMTP traffic outbound except for our Exchange Server. This is in relationship to a SpamBot issue that blacklisted us. I have an ASA 5510 running version 6.2(5) / 8.2(2) with three ports. DMZ, Inside and the Outside interface. Up till today, I only needed to block outside traffic to our internal network which I used the ASDM to configure a rule on the outside interface for an incoming rule. I am assuming I need to create an outgoing rule on the outside interface; however, just to make sure I understand the terminology/traffic flow, I created the rule with my computer as the source (192.168.0.131) with ALL destination and the service as HTTP. My logic, which seems to fail here, is that any traffic from my computer going outbound would be blocked; however I am still able to browse... That said, if I were to change the source as the Exchange server and the Service Type to SMTP, it would not actually block traffic and therefore not solve our problem. I even gone as far as permitting traffic from my computer, expanding the hit counter and I see no hits. So I am no doubt doing this wrong. What I do know, is when I first created the rule, a second rule was automatically created (Implicit rule) that deny all sources and blocked all HTTP traffic until I changed it to Permit?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2011
A recently added outbound rule has left my SMTP communications broken. I have since removed the rule, and had Cisco do some damage control, but it's still dropping some of the SMTP traffic. I get a number of NDR messages each day like the one below:Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: RE: Christopher, Curt Sent: 8/19/2011 9:38 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
[URL]
on 8/21/2011 9:49 AM
Could not deliver the message in the time limit specified. Please retry or contact your administrator.
<630.SM.Local #4.4.7>
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: RE: Christopher Curd Sent: 8/19/2011 9:38 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: JWillar@email.com on 8/21/2011 9:49 AM Could not deliver the message in the time limit specified. Please retry or contact your administrator. <630.SM.Local #4.4.7>
I've attached an image of my configuration (ASDM GUI). The part of the image highlighted in green are the SMTP rules. The part highlighted in yellow is another rule that I added about a month ago to block a SYN attack. This rule may be part of the problem because of the order it is in the list. Not sure, though.
I have had two Cisco techs Putty into my ASA to check things out. I think they've done all they can. I wonder at this point if it be wise to just reload the last good running-config I have prior to the Outbound rule being added.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2012
In Cisco ASA 5510 , outlook port only permit ( pop3 995/smtp :587) with TLS encryption. How we can do it thru ASDM .
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2011
Using an ASA5505, have 1 static outside address, want to access an inside SBS-Server on SMTP, RDP (3389), HTTPS and port 987
Have configured network object nat rules using the asdm, SMTP works (I can telnet to the server on port 25 from outside), however for some reason I can not telnet inside and out on port 25, so outgoing mail does not work. RDP does not seem to work from outside, 987 I havent tested from outside. When I try to create a network object nat rule for https I get this message from the ASA:
[OK] object network SBS-HTTPS
object network SBS-HTTPS
[ERROR] nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp https https
NAT unable to reserve ports.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2012
We have configured ASA 5510. We have configure Ethernet 0/0 ( Outside ) connected with ADSL line and Ethernet 0/1 ( Inside ) Local LAN. we have configured NAT and all the traffic is passing through outside interface. Now we have connected ethernet 0/3 ( leasedline ) interface with static public IP. Now we want to allow SMTP traffic to pass through from this interface.
How to configure it if we want our local lan SMTP traffic sending through new leased line ( Static Public IP ).
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 2, 2012
We have a customer using a 2911 router with 3 x DSL WAN links.
The customer runs a building with shared office space which people rent.
Customers in the building are experiencing a problem where they cant email other tenants i.e...
One tenants exchange server tries to make a connection to another tenants server by going out to the internet and back in via the same interface.I believe this might be called "Hair Pinning"
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2012
I need to create a firewalled segment that not only separates hosts from general population, but also from each other. The solitary confinement of firewalled segments.I know that I could create a bunch of sub-interfaces, one for each host or group that needs to be isolated, but I'd really rather not have to do that if possible. 1) It could become a management nightmare between ACLs and sub-interfaces and 2) it's a waste of IP addresses.s there any way that I can create a bunch of separate VLANs behind the firewall and have them all terminate at the firewall, using a single firewall IP address for the gateway?
VLAN 1 - hosts 1.1.1.5 and 1.1.1.6VLAN 2 - hosts 1.1.1.7
Firewall DMZ Interface - 1.1.1.1VLAN 3 - hosts 1.1.1.8 and 1.1.1.9
This way, the hosts are isolated and can't talk to each other unless they're on the same VLAN.I'm working with an ASA 5510 running 8.2.4(4).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2012
I downloaded a new image to my ASA 5510 and found out up on reboot that the ASA doesn't have enough memory so I am booting to the "ciscoasa" prompt with no config. I still have my old image in disk0:. How do I roll back to this old image?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 28, 2012
I had a working active/passive pair of ASA5510's, and then I had to do a rush firmware upgrade, but didn't have time to do it on the secondary at the same time. Now I have made config changes and upgraded the secondary firmware to be the same, and wish to know if I plug it back in if it will think the secondary has the "correct" config or if it will know that the primary is newer. I disconnected the failover cable because it was complaining about version mismatches constantly.
Is it safe to add the secondary back in or is it possible it will be declared newer and overwrite the config?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2012
I am setting up a network that will use the 1941 router with a cellular card (HWIC) to connect to the Internet for communication with remote stations in the field. The 1941 has a static IP address (166.142.xxx.yyy) on the Internet provided by the ISP (Verizon). The 1941 is connected via ethernet to the ASA5510. The end goal is to have the field cell routers (Digi Transport WR-44-R, also static IP) connect to the ASA5510 via VPN tunnels for communication back to the servers behind the firewall. I'm not sure exactly how to configure the 1941 so that the remote router can connect to the ASA using the public IP of the 1941 router. I have the 1941 working stand alone and can connect to the Internet and pass traffic, but I tried a static NAT to translate the public IP to the private IP of the ASA and cannot pass traffic. below is part of the 1941 configuration: [code]
Do I need to use VLAN bridging to accomplish the task or am I missing something with the NAT?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 17, 2012
We have an ASA5510 running version 8.25. This is in our central office in London. The London network has an ip address range of 10.110.128.0/22. Connected to this via a site-to-site VPN we have a satellite office that has an IP address range of 172.16.148.0/22.
We have now connected to our parent company via another site-to-site VPN connected to the same ASA5510. Their network has an internal range of 10.110.18.0/24. It was our parent company that issued us with our range of addresses a long while ago so that it all fits in with the rest of the company.
We have resources (web servers) on their network that we use which work just as it all should. We now want to allow our satellite office to view those same web servers. The problem is that only 10.110 addresses can flow to our parent company.
I have configured the firewall at our central office and our satellite office to route across to our parent company via our network network and the packets are flowing just fine except that obviously once they reach our firewall they cannot go to our parent company because the 172.16.148 range cannot be routed there.
My idea is to NAT traffic from our satellite office to one of our local addresses before it goes over to our parent company network.
For example: If someone in our satellite office with an IP address of 172.16.150.5 attempts to request a resource from 10.110.18.12 then the request would go via the VPN to our firewall and then get NATed to 10.110.131.200 before being passed on to our parent company network.
My question is what would the NAT configuration be to achieve this. I just cannot work out what type of NAT I would need or how to construct the command. It's probably PAT as it will be multiple addresses to a single address. Essentialy, all traffic from 172.16.148.0/22 destined for 10.110.18.0/24 should get NATed at our firewall to 10.110.131.200 before being passed on.
Just to add, we already have this working from our Cisco 3000 Concentrator which is now going to be phased out hence trying to get this to work on our ASA. The satellite office has now been moved to the ASA and as of today our parent company has been moved to the ASA.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2012
I have a private network behind a configured Cisco ASA 5510. I need to send data back and forth between a server on the inside network and a device on the outside network on port 44818. No amount of configuration is allowing this to happen. The packet tracer always fails on of the implicity "deny" rules, even though my other rule should explicitly permit it. I also realize I need to set up routing from my outside network to the inside network, but I cannot see from the documentation how to do that on this particular port without simultaneously breaking my outside connection.
The inside IP for the ASA is 192.168.25.1
The outside IP for the ASA 192.168.11.54
Here is my current configuration:
: Saved
: Written by enable_15 at 08:49:25.956 UTC Thu Feb 2 2012
!
ASA Version 8.2(5)
[Code]....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2012
I am working on a project to migrate a single Checkpoint firewall over to a single ASA 5510, no VPN, just firewall. The checkpoint firewall has 8 physical interface so the ASA 5510 also support physical 8 interfaces so thiw will be a one-to-one swap. At the moment, I don't have an ASA 5510 to test my theory so I am going to throw it out here. The checkpoint firewall is a SPLAT running on an powerfull IBM Server with 8 CPU dual cores with 32GB of RAM and it has 1200 rules with over 120,000 objects with some of the crazy NATs but it works so we will just leave it at that. There are not that much traffics going across the firewall so there are no need to put in an ASA 5585
I use the cisco conversion tool to do the policy conversion from Checkpoint to Cisco, I get about 1.5 million lines in the configuration. A lot of it has to do with Checkpoint having no concept of interface security level while ASA does. I am sure I can optimize it to cut down the number of lines in the configuration; however, that is not my main concern at the moment. The customer goal is that at the time when cutover from Checkpoint to Cisco ASA, they want everything to be perfect, meaning that it will work like magic.
My question is that can the ASA 5510 handle 1.5 million lines of configuration? Are there any limitations on this? I know there are limitations with FWSM but since I don't have an 5510 to test.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 8, 2011
I would like to know if there is a way to apply in the Cisco asa 5510 traffic shaping not for a interface but a single IP address.For example i would like to limit the bandwith for the IP address of my FTP server.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 16, 2011
we have hosted voip and would like have our internet as back for their router. We gave them public static ip so they can configure that in their router. How can i configure the ip address in our firewall let say on asa5510 ethernet port 3 so if their router T1 goes out then our internet will work as backup.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 22, 2012
I am now using ASA 5510 as a firewall device.I have configured 3 interfaces ethernet 0/0,ethernet 0/1,ethernet 0/2 as Wan interface, DMZ interface and Internal Lan interface. Internet is working fine from LAN as well as DMZ.The WAN interface use the Public Point 2 point IP(/30) Provided by the ISP and another pool of Public Ip is also provided by the ISP (/28). Now I want to Map the /28 IP to some servers in DMZ . DMZ servers currently have 192.168.101.0/27 private IP . Now the problem is how to Map the Public IP to those Private IP in DMZ servers.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 31, 2011
i just got an extra public subnet from our ISP (co hosting center) But I can't figure out how to use them on my ASA.
New:
IP-adresses: 87.1.1.194 - 87.1.1.254
Default gateway: 87.1.1.193
Subnetmask: 255.255.255.192
Old:
IP-adresses: 200.1.1.34 - 200.1.1.46
Default gateway: 200.1.1.33
Subnetmask: 255.255.255.240
Config:
route wan 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 200.1.1.33 1
And statics like:
static (interface,wan) tcp 200.1.1.37 3389 192.168.3.100 3389 netmask 255.255.255.255
View 22 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2012
We have the setup as shown above, our requirement is to access mail server via ports smtp and pop3.But as the mailserver is hosted at internet users at site were not able to aceess. we need to nat a intranet ip with mail server ip and mail server ip back to intranet ip and provide the access.We use ASA 5510 firewall.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 3, 2013
I have DMZ n/w 192.166.0.0/24 on which i have nated on public ip
-private ip : 192.16.0.201 (OWA)
-public ip : 61.x.x.x.
when i try to access owa(public ip ) from dmz it is not allowing , From what rules i need to set to get work ASA 5510 8.2
View 13 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2011
We have an issue with some NAT on an ASA 5510. Here is a simplified drawing of the ASA setup:So the issue is when we try to send traffic from 172.16.3.251 to 1.1.1.1 we got this message in the log:
Oct 18 2011 12:32:12: %ASA-3-305006: portmap translation creation failed for udp src inside
172.16.3.251 /37166 dst outside:1.1.1.1/23
It looks like there is an issue with NAT but maybe is cause of the DUAL ISP setup as packets are routed through the outside interface and not IPtelefoni_outisde?
View 13 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2012
I have a new 5510 which I have upgraded to 8.4(3). I have a /29 subnet from the telco on my outside interface. I have 6 subinterfaces on a dot1Q trunk on my inside interface. The customer requirement is to have two servers in a DMZ which have public IP's from the /29 subnet. The customer will not give the servers a new IP address so we are stuck with the two public IPs in the DMZ. I thought I would need a bridge group and bridge the outside, two DMZ interfaces but I read that bridging requires the firewall to be in transparent mode and then it won't support VPNs - this is not an option as I need to terminate VPNs on the box too.
how can I accommodate the two servers in the DMZ with public IPs whilst the ASA is in routed mode ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2012
I am working on an ASA 5510 on 8.4 IOS and need to know how to limit icmp to just a single host? What I would like to do is be able to PING from the Inside interface 10.X.X.X to host 4.2.2.2 on the Outside, but thats it no other host would be PINGable.I tried MANY different access-list statements but the only way I can get icmp out and working is using the "fixup protocol icmp" but then everything is PINGable and the ASA does not block anything.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2013
Im having problems with google saying we generate to much traffic to [URL]
I need to know which machines on the inside are talking so much with google. Can this be done via ASA 5510? do i need a third party program for this?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2012
I have a situation where we have a single DMZ server currently statically forwarded to a single public IP. TCP ports 80, 443, 8080, 8500, 53, and 21 are open to this server via an access list.
However, we have added an additional server to the DMZ, and because our web developers did not communicate with me beforehand, we are forced to use the same DNS name (thus, the same piblic IP) for this server. This server only needs traffic on TCP/8800 forwarded to it.
I am using ASDM 6.4 for configuration of this, as I am required to take multiple screen shots of the procedure for our change control policy.
My question lies in the reconfiguration of NAT/ PAT. Since our current server has a single static NAT to a single public IP, it is simply natted for "any" port. I understand that I can add the new server as an object, and only PAT it on TCP 8800, but will I then have to go back and reconfigure the first server multiple times for PAT, or will the ASA notice the specific PAT, and forward 8800 to the new server without affecting the existing "old" server?
It appears ASDM will not allow me to put multiple ports into a single network object. I am assuming I will need to add 6 separate object translations for the "old" server based on TCP port, and 1 object translation for the "new" server, correct?
View 6 Replies
View Related
