Cisco Firewall :: 6509 ICMP Echo From Firewall Interface
May 1, 2011
two 6509 chassis with VSS configuration.One of those chassis have one FWSM installed and the configuration is like this:
Switch: firewall multiple-vlan-interfacesfirewall switch 1 module 3 vlan-group 1firewall vlan-group 1 3-5,7,8,10,200 interface Vlan200 ip address 10.50.50.1 255.255.255.252end
I am not receiving icmp replays from the fswm interfaces if i try to ping 172.20.80.1 from 10.50.50.2.I do not see any debuging info in the logsI successfully ping 10.50.50.2 from the inside networks int the cat6500, but int the network 172.20.80.0, can not ping 10.50.50.2.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 16, 2013
I have ASA 5510 with soft version 8.4(5) installed. There are two interfaces:
IP 1.1.1.1/24 - inside
IP 2.2.2.1/24 - outside
I have configured PAT, so network 1.1.1.0/24 gets NATted to 2.2.2.2 address. Everything works fine, except I can't reach 2.2.2.2 via ICMP from the internet.
X.X.X.X 2.2.2.2 Deny inbound icmp src OUTSIDE:X.X.X.X dst OUTSIDE:2.2.2.2 (type 8, code 0)
But I have configured an access list allowing ICMP from any to any: access-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any
Thus address 2.2.2.1, which is binded to outside interface itself, is perfectly reachable via ICMP.
I've got two questions:
1) Is there a way to fix it? It will be handy for diagnostic purposes.
2) is it possible to configure the secondary IP address on the interface on ASA? I've read, that there are some complications.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 14, 2013
I'm having problem getting ICMP echo monitoring on outside interface to work. I've set: icmp permit host monitoring_station_adress outside but I still get:
%ASA-3-313001: Denied ICMP type=8, code=0 from monitoring_station_adress on interface outside. I'm trying to directly monitor ip on ASAs interface outside.
I have access-group tied to "in" direction on interface outside. Do I still have to put "permit icmp" rules despite the fact that icmp permit outside command is set?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 13, 2011
In order to meet our requirements we had to configure PAT for TCP 80 on 2 external IP addresses to one internal IP in DMZ. TCP port 80 is being translated for both external IP addresses and it works as expected. However, since we have migrated to ASA both external IP addresses don't respond to ICMP echo requests generating following error:
%ASA-3-106014: Deny inbound icmp src outside:<Source IP> dst outside:<Destination IP> (type 8, code 0)
Previously we have been using Cisco router to achieve the same objective and it worked well.I have noticed that when I add "same-security-traffic permit intra-interface" to a configuration the message mentioned above stops appearing in a logs.
As far as I can tell ASA sends packet back through outside interface, despite the fact that appliance advertises its mac address in response to arp request for the same external IP address.Is there any way to make ASA realise that it should respond to ICMP echo requests on external IP addresses that have forwarding setup?
I do realise that ICMP would work in 1-to-1 NAT scenario, but we can't apply 1-to-1 NAT for 2 external IP addresses to point to one internal IP address.
View 11 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2013
Attached is our network diagram showing the details of our remote office and the corporate side which are connected via private fiber. The workstation (10.10.102.84) can ping the 10.20.0.31 IP address of the PBX but not the .30 address and I know if we can’t ping it we can’t remotely manage it. The 2811 router, ASA 5510 and the 6509-E can ping both IP addresses on the PBX. The ASA logs the error "Denied ICMP type=0, from laddr 10.20.0.30 on interface inside to 10.10.102.84: no matching session" when the workstation pings the .30 address.
We changed the default gateway of the PBX from 10.20.0.2 to 10.20.0.1 (2811 router) and we were able to ping both IP addresses from the workstation but the SIP trunks from the Internet stopped working (they NAT to the .30 address). Because calls may be forwarded from the PBX to the corporate network (via IP phones) we will eventually need to change the default gateway to10.20.0.1 and still need the Internet SIP trunks.
My two questions are, how do we resolve the issue of pinging the .30 address from the workstation and then when the time comes how do we resolve the issue with the SIP traffic reaching the .30 address when we change the default GW of the PBX to the 10.20.0.1 address of the 2811 router.
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2012
I have ASA5505 configured with internal network as 192.168.15.0 and default gateway 192.168.15.1 From the inside network, i'm able to access internet and able to ping all website (enabled ping). and all internel network devices can ping each other. Except i cannot ping my gateway (ASA5505) 192.168.15.1. I'm continously seeing this message on the log, when i tried to ping.. How to fix this?
Denied ICMP type=8, code=0 from 192.168.15.xxx on interface inside
replace xxx with my network devices that try to ping the gateway..I dont want outsiders ping my gateway, i need ping for inside internal network only.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2011
I am having some issues with my ASA 5510 (running ASA 8.2) dropping ICMP unreachable-fragmentation-required-but-df-bit-set type messages coming in on the outside interface. I have the following entry in the ACL for the outside interface:access-list outside_acl extended permit icmp any interface outside and there are no other entries in that list that should take precedence and drop the packet. Pings from outside to the ASA work when this ACE is present and do no when it is absent so it is clearly taking effect. I see the following entries in the debug log when sending a large non-fragmentable packet (that would cause an intermediate router to send back this ICMP response) out to the internet through the ASa,As far as I can tell I am not running ICMP inspection; I don't want it to do any stateful magic here since the outgoing traffic would have been ordinary data from another protocol and would not have caused an outgoing ICMP connection to be built to match against.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2013
I need to monitor with ping the inside sub-interface of my ASA5540, is that possible? I get the ICMP requests but no replys going out from the box.
I need to ping the 192.168.10.250 from the 192.168.5.55:
ASA Version 8.0(5)
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
nameif inside
[Code].....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2012
Have a very peculiar issue with IP SLA. Firstly, the architecture.
1) There are two sites - A & B. Both have their own internet connection.
2) Sites A & B are connected via MPLS.
3) Both sites have the below topology.
3750 CORE --> FIREWALL -->ROUTER ---> INTERNET
4) 3750 has a Default route pointing to firewall .
5) MPLS router is connected to 3750. A default information is originated via BGP to MPLS at each location. So that default route is learnt as a backup path from any location if it has to lose its local internet.
6) IP SLA has been configured at each location to track the default route using icmp-echo to hit a public IP (i.e 4.2.2.2 as an example).
Issue?ICMP probes from Site-A via its local internet fails abruptly. I can reach the public IP mentioned above from my firewall pretty fine, but not from my 3750. Whenever i remove the tracking from the static default route & push in the plain default route without tracking, it works fine. Again, if i add the tracking back, it will work fine for an hour or so & then fails back again. To my bad, Site-B had recently gone offline due to some natural calamity. So, there is no other path for internet.
My config looks pretty simple
track 10 ip sla 1 reachability
!
ip sla 1
icmp-echo 4.2.2.2 source-ip 10.1.254.1
frequency 180
ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now
ip sla enable reaction-alerts
!
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.254.1 track 10
I am running IOS version 12.2(53)SE2 (IPservices images).
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2013
How do I disable ICMP echo on ea4500 - I don't see anywhere either in Connect or directly on the router web interface that allows this.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2012
I am experiencing inconsistent echo-replay from devices connected via VPC to Nexus 5500s while pinging from the Nexus exec prompt.
In some cases I receive normal response when pinging from one Nexus, but no response when pinging from the other switch. In other instance I receive normal response to one Nexus, and duplicate replays to the other. It looks like a VPC related bug. NXOS is 5.1.3.N2.1
5501# ping 10.12.12.232
PING 10.12.12.232 (10.12.12.232): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.12.12.232: icmp_seq=0 ttl=253 time=8.585 ms
64 bytes from 10.12.12.232: icmp_seq=0 ttl=254 time=9.227 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 10.12.12.232: icmp_seq=1 ttl=253 time=1.011 ms
64 bytes from 10.12.12.232: icmp_seq=2 ttl=253 time=8.097 ms
64 bytes from 10.12.12.232: icmp_seq=2 ttl=254 time=9.429 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 10.12.12.232: icmp_seq=3 ttl=253 time=18.195 ms
64 bytes from 10.12.12.232: icmp_seq=4 ttl=253 time=8.807 ms(code)
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2012
Need to clarify if ip sla icmp echo operation is supported in catalyst 3kx switches (ip services)? on the configuration guide, commands are available, but on the feature navigator, i can't find the feature, only ip sla video operation. i don't have a device to test on here.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 2, 2011
I have attached a pdf of an example of a FWSM configuration with shared interfaces. Now what I dont get is (please refer to the link) url...Is there any difference between the natting that they have done on page B-4 on Context A.as opposed to configuring a static NAT for processing traffic to correct context nat(inside,outside) 209.165.201.0 10.1.2.0.The other question is on page B-2 (diagram) Context A has a customer A network linked to the inside interface. Is it possible to put a default route towards that "Network 2" cloud and restrict traffic from the 6509 switch towards the context A?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 4, 2011
I have problem with traffic coming from GRE interface and going further through FWSM on the same 6509-E chassis.It's very interesting and confusing. If packets are fragmented, I can go through, however, if I use normal packets (usual ping for example) traffic goes from outside to inside and stops on it's way back.
Here is the detailed info:
WS-C6509-E with WS-SUP720-3B
FWSM HW 4.0, SW 4.1(4)
GRE is done in hardware (source is loopback interface - only one loopback per GRE tunnel).
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 8, 2012
i have been facing strange issue on FWSM (6509 switch). we have created a vlan inteface for server farm on fwsm and its stop responding automatically and we need to give shut/ no shut command under that interface to back into normal .
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jul 19, 2011
Is blocking echo request to prevent ping sweep the same as having a firewall in stealth mode? And how could someone ping sweep from outside if you had a firewall at all?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2011
I do have the below setup,,
1. I have 6509 switch
2. I have 2 WLC configured in Active/Active mode connected in Trunk mode (L2 Port-Channel) connected with 6509 switch
3. On switch side i have configured the port as Trunk
4. L3 SVI for wireless users are created in 6509 switch (attached the diagram).
I would like to introduce a Cisco ASA 5520 firewall with AIp-SSM module so that all wirelees traffic can be inspected.
The issue is: Without changing any configuration in the network (switch & WLC) is it possible to introduce the firewall?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 17, 2011
Is there any significance to the parameter "firewall-group" in the command
firewall vlan-group <firewall-group> <vlan-id>…<vlan-id>?
In other words is the series of commands
firewall switch 1 module 3 vlan-group 1,2
firewall vlan-group 1 100,101,102
firewall vlan-group 2 200,201,202
exactly equivalent to
firewall switch 1 module 3 vlan-group 3
firewall vlan-group 3 100,101,102,200,201,202
or
firewall switch 1 module 3 vlan-group 1,2,3
firewall vlan-group 1 100,200
firewall vlan-group 2 101,201
firewall vlan-group 3 102,202
All three of these options associate the same set of vlans to the FWSM but using different groupings. As far as I can tell, these groupings have no functional significance either on the switch side or the FWSM side. These are simply three different ways of specifying exactly the same thing? Am I correct?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2011
I am familiar with the PIX and ASA's. We have two Cisco 6509's with a FWSM installed in both. Our network is shown in the diagram. We use Blue Coat Packetshapers and Barracuda Proxy appliances. I plan on setting up HSRP on both 6509's for traffic coming from our ISP Cisco 2811's as well as use HSRP for our DMZ and internal network. I would like to setup the firewalls for statefull failover. We will be using PAT for our internal users and one-to-one static NAT for our DMZ.
Is it better to setup the firewall's as transparent or routed?
Since the firewall is built into the switch, how do I insert the Barracuda proxies? I can configure them as transparent or routed proxies.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2011
So I have my shiny new (used, but new to me) 5510 finally working and installed in my Dev network. I need to have icmp (ping and trace route) available from the inside network. I Google and found a few articles on how to do it. I tried modifying the class maps, but it looks like there are changes in the commands in 8.4 and the articles I found evidently were for 8.2 and lower. I tried doing it with access lists, again from examples and traffic stopped in all directions (not good) so I am back to being functional and how to do it in 8.4. Documentation seems sparse on the net with 8.4
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 23, 2012
I'm having issues with NAT dropping ICMP on default NAT. Do I need to create another NAT for ICMP?
Here's the packet-tracer result:
firewall01# packet-tracer input inside icmp 172.23.1.74 0 10 8.8.8.8 detailed
Phase: 1
Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP
Subtype: input
Result: ALLOW
Config:
[code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2012
Is it really the case that the ASA will not generate ICMP Host Unreachable messages for sub nets connected to any of its interfaces (in breach of RFC1812) as claimed here: [URL]
I'm investigating a situation where an organization uses ASAs to control traffic between different v lans in their internal production systems as well as Internet traffic. They are having problems with internal load balancing because the ASAs do not (as currently configured) generate Host Unreachable packets. Can this be changed in the configuration or not? I have to say, if it can't then I'd urge them to find something else to route between their internal sub nets.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2011
I have an ASA5510 running version 8.4. ICMP is blocked from the internet to the outside interface of our firewall but now our ISP is requesting us to allow ICMP from their network to the outside of our ASA. I need to allow ICMP from three blocks of IP Addresses?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2012
I am working on an ASA 5510 on 8.4 IOS and need to know how to limit icmp to just a single host? What I would like to do is be able to PING from the Inside interface 10.X.X.X to host 4.2.2.2 on the Outside, but thats it no other host would be PINGable.I tried MANY different access-list statements but the only way I can get icmp out and working is using the "fixup protocol icmp" but then everything is PINGable and the ASA does not block anything.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 29, 2011
I am using a Pix 515 with IOS 8.0(3).I have in my access list on the outside interface.......access-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any 12.23.34.0 255.255.255.0 echo access-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any 12.23.34.0 255.255.255.0 echo-reply.......in order to allow ping requests and ping replies into my inside network. This certainly works since I can ping the inside from outside and vice versa, but in the ASDM display of access rules, the hit count for these two lines is always zero. If I run 'show access-list', the hit count for these lines is non-zero.
Why doesn't the hit count show up in the ASDM gui display?Also, I have read that the PIX does not treat ICMP in the same way as TCP or UDP and there is no stateful behaviour towards ICMP. However, if I set up a continuous ping from outside to inside and then disable the above access list rule allowing echo requests towards the inside, the ping continues whereas I would expect it to stop.
In the config there is 'timeout icmp 00:00:02' if there is no stateful connection for ICMP, why is there a timeout value for it?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2013
Today I run into a problem with enabling ICMP traffice between two inside interfaces on ASA5510 (version 8.2). I tried to ping from 192.168.1.2 to 192.168.2.2 Failed. But I can visit outside websites or ping from any of the two addresses above to 8.8.8.8 So I checked the configuration shown as follow
<omitted>
interface ethernet0/1
nameif inside
[Code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2012
I have a Cisco ASA 5505 in our office. We are currently using Interface 0 for outside and 1 for inside. We only have 1 Vlan in our environment. We have two three switches behind the firewall. Today the uplink to Interface 1, to the firewall, on the switch went bad. I want to setup a second inside interface on the firewall and configure it as failover incase this happens again. I want to attach it to the other switch. Can I do this? If so, what do I need to do? would it only be a passive/standby interface?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2013
I have an asa 5520. How would I configure my dedicated management interface to be able to route off subnet while the firewall is in transparent mode?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2011
I have problem with icmp traceroute configuration. When I enabling icmp error inspection in global policy, my traceroute results through ASA 8.2.4 looks like this: My traceroute [v0.75]
icmp inspection and ttl decrement on ASA is enabled. Also I configured ACL on outside interface to permit ICMP completely.
View 14 Replies
View Related
May 10, 2012
i have removed the icmp inspection from my default policy-map in my ASA 5520,now i could not able to ping to 4.2.2.2 from my LAN even though i have configured an ICMP Access-list in my asa like ,but I can't ping 4.2.2.2 for testing the Internet connectivity,what shall i do to allow only my self as admin to ping outside?
-icmp permit host 192.168.60.60 echo
-icmp permit host 192.168.60.60 echo-reply
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 16, 2011
I am getting ready to deploy a 3945 ISR to serve as an internet and core router for and remote site. I will be terminating a site-to-site VPN tunnel on it and also configuring a zone based firewall config between my "outside" (internet link) and "inside" (all internal nets). My question is about how to approach securing the WAN interface with the Zone based FW in place?what kind of ACL do I need beyond those allowing and restricting remote access to the outside ip?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2011
I've recently upgraded my old firewall from a PIX to an ASA5505 and have been trying to match up the configuration settings to no avail. I have is that I can't ping the new firewall on it's inside interface, despite having "icmp permit any inside" in the running config. Secondly, the server I have on there ("Sar") can't connect out to the internet.I've included the ASA's running config incase anybody can see if something stands out. I have a feeling it's either not letting anything onto the inside interface, or there is no nat going on. Lastly (and possibly relevant), the firewall is actually going at the end of a vlan, which is different to the firewall's inside vlan number. I don't know if this is actually the problem because the server can't connect out even if connected directly into the firewall.
View 32 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2011
I have been working with ASA 5510,20,40,80 but not with 5505 this vlan and its interfaces are quite confusing.Just want to know how it works and its connectivity to Cisco Switch.Do i have to put the interface of the switch in the same vlan as i am creating the interface vlan in firewall ?Now the switch port connecting to this Eth1 interface should also be in the same vlan ? i.e vlan3 ?? or it will be in trunk ? The default configuration shows the eth0 with no access vlan and interface eth1 with access vlan 2... does it mean the eth0 is in vlan1 ? (Nativ Vlan ) ???
View 4 Replies
View Related
