Cisco Firewall :: 8.2 (2) / Need To Enable NAT To New Range On ASA For Entire Subnet?
Feb 27, 2013
I've done this in the past for specific host entries with no problem, but I can't figure out how to do this for an entire subnet. I need something along the lines of the following:
access-list OKC2DAL extended permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.107.0 255.255.255.0
static (inside,outside) 192.168.99.0 access-list OKC2DAL netmask 255.255.255.0
I see netmask as an option, but the ASA states "invalid option netmask." The ASA is running 8.2(2). OKC-PIX(config)# static (inside,outside) 192.168.99.0 access-l OKC2DAL ?
configure mode commands/options:
<0-65535> The maximum number of simultaneous tcp connections the local IP
hosts are to allow, default is 0 which means unlimited
connections. Idle connections are closed after the time
specified by the timeout conn command
[code].....
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 31, 2011
if its possible to set a maximum bandwidth for the entire wlan or for entire Vlan in the WLC 5508 ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 23, 2011
I have a supplier which i need to connect a site to site ipsec vpn connection to (from a draytek router). I have already done this on our main site with no problems using the local ip details of 192.168.1.0 and subnet 255.255.255.0 however i need to do the same on our DR site which uses the ip details of 10.1.0.0 and subnet of 255.255.0.0. Our supplier told me the 255.255.0.0 is already used at there end by a different customer so we are unable to connect the vpn and communicate (in theroy we can connect but our supplier cannot reply). We can setup a connection to another spare server on a different address using a different subnet but effectivly this would mean that communication would stop at that server and communcation to the overall network or specific server the supplier needs access to (on the 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 network) is not possible. I was thinking maybe an internal vpn server to server connection through win server may do it, 2 nic cards or routes in the server routing table but this all seems a bit messy. Our network consits of win 2003 and 2008 R2 servers and is basic network with modem-vpnfirewall-switch and devices on the internal network connecting to the switch.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2012
Given an IP address range, select the correct subnet mask for the scenario. IP address: 132.250.0.0/16, You need to create 100 networks with a minimum of 500 hosts per network. What is the correct Subnet mask and the 10th subnet address range?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2011
I recently purchased an SG300-28P. I have 2 VLANS/subnets that are successfully routing between them.Machines on both sides can ping each other just fine, but none of the usual Windows/NetBIOS browsing is possible. I've recently learned that NetBIOS is not usually forwarded between subnets. How would I enable NetBIOS packet forwarding between my subnets?
Reading the manual, it seems like enabling UDP Relay might be the answer but I've been unable to get it to work (same with DHCP relay).
View 8 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2012
I’m having issues with enabling Apple’s AirPlay services on a relatively simple network consisting of a Cisco 881 (Advanced IP Services) and an autonomous Cisco 1142 AP. I’ve attached a diagram explaining the connectivity. I believe I have to enable IP Multicast at the router, but I’m not really sure the best/right way to do it. Also I’m not sure what/if any commands would be needed at the AP.All of the wireless clients are confirmed to be in the same subnet, so no real routing is happening etc. Also regular Internet connectivity/routing from the wireless clients is fine.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2013
I have a simple setup where I have a 2911 router with three interfaces, Inside, Outside and a second "Inside" interface which is labelled as a DMZ. The Zone Firewall applied to the "DMZ" is actually Inside (until I can work through problems). I need to be able to access a device on the DMZ via its external IP so I have designed NAT to use IP Nat Enable commands. This is now working for me fine. However, since utilising IP Nat Enable, my zone firewall now denies return TCP / UDP traffic and consequently I no longer have any internet access. Looking at the syslog messages, the reason for this is that the router is denying these return flows not because they are matching the outside-to-inside policy, but rather they are matching the outside-to-SELF policy. The router seems the detect that the internet traffic is being returned to SELF, when in reality the NAT rule should pick this up and forward it to inside. I can understand why this is happening, because I am NATting all private / inside traffic behind the external IP of the router, which is assigned to the Gi0/0 interface. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2011
if y need to enable VPN IPSec through the firewall. y just need to need to allow the port 4500?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2011
We want to use an ASA as a pure routing device. Our network has several internal subnets (10.1.x.0/24), and we want to be able to reach them from outside and to allow access between them.
We have a defined a VLAN for each subnet range with the same security-level, added it to an Ethernet port and made the Ethernet that acts as outside as a trunk, and defined it as the global routing.
We cannot ping any of the subnet IPs defined in the ASA from outside nor we can ping it from the internal IP addresses.
Configuration:
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.2(1)
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 4, 2012
I have been tasked with replacing our company eSoft router with a Cisco ASA 5505 with the upgraded security license. I have been working on the configuration for a couple of weeks now, after reading hundreds of forum posts, watching youtube videos, and endless google searching, and despite my best efforts I am still having an issue I can’t figure out.
I have a couple of subnets, that when the ASA is connected, I cannot ping, nor can they get to the internet or our Exchange server. At this point I’m not sure if it’s an access rule issue, NAT issue, or DNS issue.
Here is the network layout:
ASA: 192.168.0.2 (Primary Gateway)
192.168.0.0 (Primary facility, ASA is the gateway)
192.168.2.0 (Second facility, connected via Verizon point-to-point)
192.168.3.0 (Third facility, connected via Verizon point-to-point)
[Code].....
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 5, 2012
I am working on translating configuration from a firewall named Joe box to ASA 5515. On Joe box, it has 5 continuous public IP addresses (xx.xx.xx.73 -77/29), first one as interface IP and others as alias, on the Internet-facing interface. I need to configure ASA 5515 in the same way, however it seems not simple.
- The way to configure sub interfaces on 5515 is by configuring V LAN.
- The interface can hold xx.xx.xx.73/29 without a problem.
- The first sub interface can have IP address xx.xx.xx.74 however with different mask(/16), as it doesn’t allow /29.
- The second sub interface doesn’t allow to enter IP xx.xx.xx.75, saying "Failed to apply IP address to interface GigabitEthernet0.x, as the network overlaps with interface GigabitEthernet0. Two interfaces cannot be in the same sub net."
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 9, 2012
Background: I have a couple of ASA 5510's I'm going to put in our lab environment. I have restored them to default config and set up the m0/0 interface with an ip/mask and started the http server. My lab environment is on the 10.45 subnet and my .com corporate environment is on the 10.40 subnet. I've also setup DNS and, from the ASA, can ping anything in the 10.45 subnet.
The problem, is that from the ASA, I can not ping the internet or my 10.40 subnet. And vice versa, I cannot ping the ASA from my 10.40 subnet. When I bring up a regular server, there is no special configuration I need to do as those subnets talk to each other and nothing is restricted.
Is there something special I need to do go get it to work? I tried adding a access list to allow icmp, but that didn't seem to work.Oh, and I'm getting to the ASA by RDPing into a lab server (on 10.45) then putty to the ASA.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2012
Currently have an ASA5520, management port is set to management only connected to a management vlan, inside, outside and dmz ports also in use for respective traffic, all is working well, the issue i have is that the ITsupport staff on there user vlan have to have access to manage the ASA with ASDM at all times, this all works fine as i have added a route for management to there subnet, problem is that from this vlan they can no longer ping the remote sites which connect via site to site vpn. For troubleshooting and management purposes this is required, is there any way around this?, if we make the management port not management-only how will this effect other traffic or routing?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2011
First off, let me preface this by saying that I'm a novice when it comes to firewalls and more specifically, the ASA. I do however, have an above average understanding of switches/routers.
We have an ASA 5510 running 8.3 and recently I've decided to clean up the last admin's mess. All hosts and servers are on the same subnet, multiple subnets on the same VLAN... and a slew of other problems. Anyway, I recently placed the IT department on another subnet to test some things out before I migrated other departments to different networks. Everything seems to be working as it should be with the exception of one of our servers. The IT subnet is 192.168.150.0/24 and the problem server is on the 192.168.10.xxx network. I'm guessing the issue lies somewhere in the fact this server does have a static NAT and is accessible from the public. Let me give you an overview of what our network looks like:
ISP ---->ASA----->3750----->2960
My workstation is directly plugged into the 3750 switch, and the server is plugged into the 2960. I'm able to ping this server by both IP and hostname. However, I cannot access port 80 by IP or hostname. The users that are on the 192.168.10 and 192.168.11 (sadly both of those are on the same VLAN) network are able to access this server without a problem. Thinking logically, I thought I would send a packet from my workstation, it would head to the layer 3 switch's VLAN interface corresponding to my subnet, realize the .10 network is directly connected and then forward the packet straight to the server. However, it doesn't seem to be working that way. It look like it's being routed to the ASA then being dropped. I guess there's an access rule or firewall rule preventing me from getting to the server. Is there a specific part of my config you will need to see...
View 15 Replies
View Related
Aug 8, 2012
We have an ASA 5520, working fine.One of the interfaces is connected to users PCs and printers mainly. Last months the number of devices has grown rapidly, and we would like to make some changes in it in order for it to be able to host new devices.We thought on change subnet mask of actual subnet (10.0.2.0/24) to 10.0.2.0/23, so it can hold as many devices.I understand I have to make some changes in the ASA, but my question is:What will happend to the acces rules I have created?Will I need to create them again? There are some objects which carry information about subnet mask, so I suppose I will need to redefine them, but for those without any subnet mask information, will I have to redefine them?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2013
This question is in the context of servers sitting in a colocation environment behind an ASA5510 with security plus license.Our colo provider is going to be statically routing a /28 public subnet to our ASA5510 (say 1.1.1.0/28). We will also be getting a single IP (say 2.2.2.2/30) on a small router-to-router subnet (2.2.2.0/30) to which the 1.1.1.0/28 subnet will be statically routed to our ASA5510 from our colo provider.I will obviously set the outside interface of the ASA to be 2.2.2.2/30 so that the colo provider can route the 1.1.1.0/28 subnet to it. I will also set a default route to 2.2.2.1 which is the IP of our colo providers gateway (and the router that will be statically routing the 1.1.1.0/28 subnet to us).
We have various servers in the same rack as the ASA (connected via a 3750G switch). Some of these servers need to be exposed to the internet (web, email, etc servers) and some do not (database servers).I'm considering 2 different ways of designing the network but I have questions about both and not sure which way to go:
1) Scenario #1: Using NAT and private IP's for all servers.In this scenario where/how do I assign the internal network (say 10.1.1.0/24) and the public routed subnet (1.1.1.0/28)? I assume the internal 10.1.1.0/24 is an inside network assigned to the interface connected to the 3750G (to which all the servers connect). However, where do I assign the public routed subnet (1.1.1.0/28) since it is somewhat "nebulous" in that it has to reside somewhere on the ASA so that it can then NAT to the internal (10.1.1.0/24) IP's. Also, is it considered an outside or inside network - and on which interface? My confusion is that If its added to the outside interface then won't that conflict with the 2.2.2.2 IP to which the colo provider is routing our 1.1.1.0/28 subnet to? And if its on the inside interface connected to the 3750G then wont that conflict with the 10.1.1.0/24 private IP range of the servers?
2) Scenario #2: Using public IP's for all servers:This scenario seems more straightforward to me: I would want to assign IP's from the statically routed subnet (1.1.1.0/28) to my servers so that range would be configured as an inside network on the interface connected to the 3750G (to which all the servers connect). This would be configured on a specific VLAN (say vlan 50). I would then have another VLAN (say VLAN 100) on the 3750G that has a private IP range (say 10.1.1.0/24) so that non-public servers (database, etc) would reside on there. All public servers that need access to private servers would have a NIC on both VLANS (50 + 100). My question is is this the correct way of approaching this? I also like this because I dont have to worry about NAT and the ASA can act as a router/firewall and things are clear in terms of whats happening.
Ultimately I'm not sure which is the best way to go in terms of having all servers on a private IP range and just NAT to them (as per scenario 1), or implement scenario 2 where servers have two interfaces.The main thing thats bugging me from scenario 1 is I'm not sure where/how to assign the statically routed subnet (1.1.1.0/28) on the ASA? (inside? outside? which interface?).
View 12 Replies
View Related
Apr 9, 2012
setting up an ACL on my ASA 5510 to permit access only to the Nat subnet from inside to the outside interface. This firewall is setup for the DR solution in the production network. I am applying following acl in the inbound direction on the inside interface.
permit ip any "Nat_subnet"
After appliying this acl to inside interface I observed that I can ping to the destinations in NAT'ed subnet but unable to ssh to the servers. Following is the summary of my configuration.
!
interface Ethernet0/0
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address 192.168.135.241 255.255.255.248 standby 192.168.135.242
[code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2012
I am carving up an internet Class C for customer. This class C is used by 3 distinct QA, Corporate and Production firewalls. I want to carve up IP space so there is a /26 for each environment. The issue I have is the firewalls may need communication with each other via the public IP space. Currently I don’t have any L3 switches in between the firewalls and the edge internet router. So with subnetting, it would seem I need to push everything through the internet router for the intra-firewall communication.I would rather not push this traffic through the edge router, so I came up with an idea to allocate all firewall outside interface IP’s in the 4th (last remaining) /26. That way, I can allow firewalls to communicate over the primary interface IP’s, which will all be in the same subnet – without going through a routing “engine”/device.
For the actual environment subnets (NAT's on respective firewalls), I create a static route on the edge router pointing to each of the firewall’s primary IP’s for the respective environment routes (the first 3 - /26’s).This is still a beta design, but I have done this before on small scale when ISP gave me 2 subnets for example, assuming I was going to put a router in between the customer firewall and ISP. I would use the “routed subnet” on the ASA interface, and then pull the NAT’s from the other subnet. The ISP would have to add a static route directing the NAT subnet to the “routed subnet” correct IP - which would be the firewall outside interface primary IP.I recently found out that with ASA OS 8.4.3 and up, ASA will not proxy arp for IP’s not in its local interface subnet. This means the ISP/router will have to assign static ARP entries on the edge router. This can get messy after the first few NAT entries. So I am debating the design now. I think this kind of stuff going forward won’t be worthwhile with newer ASA 8.4.3 code.
How to communicate between different ASA’s, while still carving up the Class C into usable smaller subnets? The primary reason for doing this in the first place is to support routing on the edge router. I am thinking it might be time to ask for another Class C to do the routing functions, and keep the firewalls all at Layer 2 in one /24 - Class C?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 23, 2011
I want to give access to remote subnet on firewall 5505.
Remote subnet is 16x.15X.56.0
Here is my access list
access-list outside_5_cryptomap extended permit ip 192.168.12.0 255.255.254.0 16x.15X.56.0 255.255.254.0
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2012
We recently upgraded a ASA 5505 with the security plus license to allow us to add a second subnet, but are having a few problems configuring the second subnet. The original subnet we have configured 10.1.1.0 is able to access the internet without any problems. However the new subnet 10.1.5.0 is unable to access the internet and when we ran a trace packet the nat config nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 is showing as the rule that drops the packet.
Additionally we have not been able to get the 2 subnets to talk to each other even though same-security-traffic permit inter-interface is configured. How to configure the subnet 10.1.5.0 to access the internet or to get the subnets to communicate. Below is a streamlined version of our current config.
!interface Vlan1nameif insidesecurity-level 100ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 ospf cost 10!interface Vlan2nameif outsidesecurity-level 0ip address 66.66.66.66 255.255.255.240 ospf cost 10!interface Vlan13nameif corporatesecurity-level 100ip
[Code].....
View 15 Replies
View Related
Aug 17, 2011
As this is an ASA 5505, unlimited users, I must use arp alias to allow a secondary network.
Inside network: 10.200.31.0/24.Additional inside network: 10.200.12.0/24
Clients in both networks can reach internet, but they can't communicate with eachother. Hosts on the additional network can ping the ASA inside network IP, but nothing else. I get incomming hitcount for inside interface when 10.200.12.x tries to ping 10.200.31.x. In the error log, I see: [code]
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2011
I'm new to Cisco equipment much more familiar w/ Sonicwall w/ that said......I have a 5505 w/ Security Plus licensing
I have set up multiple VLANs as follows
VLAN 1 inside - still setup as 192.168.1.1 (will not be using this for our lan)
VLAN2 - outside
VLAN100 - LAN 10.1.1.1/24
[Code]....
If I do add all the VLANs above I understand I will probably have to make a trunk port since I only have 5 usable interfaces
View 12 Replies
View Related
Aug 7, 2011
I am using an ASA5510 for internal firewalling in my QA environment. How do I allow RDP from one subnet to those protected by the firewall? Preferably using the ASDM.
View 25 Replies
View Related
Mar 31, 2013
I have 2 questions to confirm and/or get direction on how to modify.
1) is there a way to get around the (seemingly arbitrary) class C (slash 24+) subnet restriction for the primary/main IP address for the internal LAN?
(I realize I can setup multiple internal subnets but that also seems to introduce restrictions for port ‘forwarding’ and ‘one-to-one NAT’ use because those features seem to be restricted to the primary/main IP subnet)
2) it seems like all traffic is passed to the host on the internal side of a ‘One-to-One NAT’ regardeless of the firewall rules in place, is that what is be expected?
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2012
We recently received the request to work on removing the entire NAC implementation from our enterprise. The major problem is that the security team in place now was not around when it was implemented a few years ago. Weve got about 1500 users, so its not going to be a small project to say the least. Fortunately for us, the team that set it up didn't do much with it. IT only really checks the user against AD and permits or quarantines the user/machine, that's it.
Version 4.7.2
View 9 Replies
View Related
Feb 11, 2013
I have an ASA5505 which provides internet (just internet) for about more than 600 pc/laptops. Can 5505's DHCP support this number?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 8, 2011
I have setup two different subnet 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0 on the same 'inside' interface. They are unable talking to each other. I can ping from firewall to both subnet. Both side unable talking to each other unless I add route on the both side systems.I have added the followings in ASA5510. [code]
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 11, 2012
I have a network with 3 sites that are on different subnets. Each site has an ASA Right now, I am only able to connect to the ASA that is connected to the subnet I am connected to.I want to be able to connect to the ASA that are on the remote subnets on the address of the inside interface.The sites are connected all together by site-to-site VPN.Is there any way I can achieve that without opening the outside interface directly on the Internet?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2011
verify if the ASA 5520 CSC module way of applying security policy (http, smtp, pop3, etc.) is per network/subnet or group of users? Based on my understanding through reading, web and email protection profile/config is global. It will be the same to every network user that is redirected via service-policy config on the ASA.
Scenario: I have two VLAN, guest and employee. Of course guest and employee have different web filter profile. Can i configure it such that guest web-filter profile is not just strict while employee's access is limited only to productive internet sites.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2012
I have an ASA which is managing internet access from mutiple VLANs configured on a 3560 switch. I want to be able to limit the 100MB internet connection on the ASA on a per subnet (VLAN) basis for the multiple subnets configured on the switch..
so for example
VLAN10 - 10.0.10.0 - limit to 5MB
VLAN20 - 10.0.20.0 - limit to 10MB
VLAN30 - 10.0.30.0 - limit to 3MB
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2011
I work as an administrator for a small business (~30pc and a Windows 2003 R2 server ).Recently, we started to have problem with our lan, the network start to kinda lock-up randomly. For example, browsing folders is fine then you switch to one and the explorer window just do nothing (with a loading cursor) and after 4 second everything refresh and work again, then in word or any other program (sometime not even related to network files/folder) you press the save button and it do the same, do nothing for 4-5 seconds then refresh and work again.I'm positive that no process on the server take up enough CPU time to do that, it's not a per-pc problem since everybody is affected when the problem start and when I reboot the server it work like a charm for another day then the problem may restart the next day.Nothing show up in the event viewer of both PCs and the server and we can't find a correlation between the problem and high CPU/LAN usage on the server (at worse CPU is used at 10% and LAN at 2%).Our RAID controller and our SAS HDs are working flawlessly, we're in the process to change our infrastructure anyway but since I can refer to people that may know their stuff way more than myself I though Id ask here.We first though that our switches may be in cause but then why rebooting the server would be correcting the problem ?
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2011
Is there a command that can show EVERYTHING that is configured on a router or switchSeems if you're looking to save enough information to completely swap out a device the run/start config isn't enough.Settings like VTP and MTU settings aren't shown in the config file ... there may be other configuration settings like thisAm I forced to just know to check those settings are is there a command that will show the running-config AND all these other settings that aren't in the config?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 21, 2011
I am in charge of taking care our small office network (about 25 PC's) and encountered a problem the other day. I got a call that nothing network related was working. I went to look at the switches/router and everything appeared fine. After some troubleshooting i found if i unplugged the switch and connected directly the the router everything worked prefect. Reconnected the switch, network goes down again. I assumed it was the switch at first but then did a walk around and a laptop was in a weird frozen state. I unhooked the network cable and everything started working away like it should.
View 9 Replies
View Related
