Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 8.4(5) Outside PPPOE Interface Not Available In Site

May 13, 2013

We have a Cisco ASA 5510 with:
-version: asa845-k8.bin
-ASDM: asdm-711-52.bin
 
Interface "Outside" is a PPPOE configuration.We currently have 36 site to site VPN connections up and running through the "Outside" interface. Now when we try to add, via ASDM, a new site to site VPN connection, we can not choose the "Outside" interface. The interface is just not available. All other interfaces are, bot those are inside interfaces.
 
I tried running ASDM on a different computer (thought that ASDM or java got corrupted perhaps), but the same problem appeared.Now when we "shutdown" the outside interface and "no shutdown" it again, the "Outside" interface is available again when you add a new site to site VPN profile.
 
Sidenote: if we check the current profile of a succesful running site to site VPN, it say's that it's using an inside interface. But that is, ofcourse, not possible.

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 - Web Interface On NAS From Remote Site Across VPN Tunnel?

Dec 3, 2012

I have two routers on my internal network.

10.10.199.106 is a Cisco ASA5510.

10.10.199.108 is a Sonicwall NSA 3500
 
The sonicwall handles our site to site VPN tunnels.  The Cisco handles our client to site VPN connections.
 
I have a unit that points to 10.10.199.106 (Cisco) for internet access.  All other clients on the network point to 10.10.199.108 (Sonicwall) for internet access.The device in question, a Synology NAS, is using 10.10.199.68 as it's IP address.
 
I'm trying to hit the web interface on the NAS from a remote site across our VPN tunnel.  The IP scheme on the remote end of the VPN tunnel is 192.168.72.0/24.
 
Going through the VPN, I can hit every object on the network that uses .108 (Sonicwalll) as it's gateway.  However, I cannot hit the unit that uses .106 (Cisco) as it's gateway. 
 
I added a route statement (using ASDM) that routes all traffic destined to 192.168.72.0/24 to the Sonicwall so it can send it back down the VPN tunnel.  If I'm understanding routing correctly, this should allow responses from NAS destined for 192.168.72.0/24 to go back down the VPN tunnel.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 5505 Site-to-site Vpn With ADSL PPPoE Connection

Oct 10, 2012

I would like know is that possible to connect two 5505 ASA in site to site VPN with 1 site using ADSL pppoe connection?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 Configured One Site To VPN

Feb 10, 2013

i have  cisco  ASA5510  Firewall and  configured   one  site to VPN . i  want  to   configure  another  s2s vpn  in  the FW for  another  Site location.what  to  in the existing  Firewall  so that  2  site to site  vpn  can work.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 Cannot Connect To Site Through Appliance

Mar 22, 2011

I have an @Remote appliance through Ricoh for our copiers.  This appliance connects to their site to transfer meter readings and other information.  This appliance can't connect to their site to transmit data.  Ricoh is telling me the problem is on our firewill.  I have assigned the Ricoh appliance a static IP address in our network.  Our firewall is a Cisco ASA 5510.  I don't have much expereince with logging on the ASA, so I'm not sure what "teardown dynamic TCP translation from inside" means.  Is there something that is preventing this IP from contacting the Ricoh site? [code]

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 Firewall Interface Speed

Jul 21, 2011

I have a ASA5510 and I have a question about the speed the ports can handle, here is one port:
 
-interface Ethernet0/2
- speed 100
-shutdown
- no nameif
-no security-level
-no ip address
 
it's ethernet and not fastethernet so I figure it will only go to 10Mbps, but at the same time I can hard code the speed to 100.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: DMZ Sub Interfaces Into Sub Interface Of Asa5510

Jul 5, 2012

We have ASA FW 5010 in our organization and we have 4 DMZ's under the DMZ interface on ASA and all DMZ's are created on sub interfaces and assigned different VLANS on each DMZ's.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 / How To Hide All IPs Behind An Interface

Dec 17, 2012

We use filter rules on an ASA5510 firewall to direct clients to a web filtering server which generally works very well.  However lately we're finding that despite having more web filtering licenses than users, the web filtering licenses are being consumed up, mainly because of a recent increase in the rollout of ipads, iphones, androids etc. We  could deploy a proxy server in the wireless DMZ to make all the  wireless devices appear to web filter as a single IP, and apply a single  policy, but that brings it's own problems. My question is: Is there a way to hide them all behind the interface IP instead, so that all wireless devices appear to the web filter on the LAN as the wireless dmz interface IP rather than the wireless device IP?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Switch ASA5510 Outside Interface Connection

Mar 10, 2011

Our ASA 5510 is running 8.0(5). We recently upgraded the license from base to security plus. By doing so the capacity of the the external port Ethernet0/0 and Ethernet0/1 should increase from the original FE to GE. But, we were still seeing 100 Mbps on our Ethernet0/0 interface. We figured that out that the provider switch is only supporting 100 Mbps which is a bottleneck for us.The provider will be upgrading there switches to 1 Gb switch.
 
We will have to swap the switch connections now from 100 Mbps to 1 Gb switch.What commands should we be familar ourself with?Though this will be doine in our maintenace window.All the transaltions/connections will be dropped in our production environment so we are kind of scared.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 - Block IP Address From Outside Interface

Jun 23, 2011

Recently, I've been having significant problems with denial of service on our ASA-5510. Two IP addresses in particular attack my ASA regularly. What kind of rule do I need to create to deny these IP's access to my firewall?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 Impossible To Ping Outside Interface

Aug 4, 2011

I'm currently configuring an ASA5510.I connected a laptop (IP 192.168.96.18/255.255.255.0) to port 0/2 and tried to ping 192.168.100.2 ... impossible to ping outside interface.I resetted the config of the ASA to retest more simple. [code]

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 - Cannot SSH Or ASDM To Management Interface

Jan 21, 2013

I try to SSH and get access denied.
 
I try to ASDM and get "Unable to launch device manager from 172.16.252.100"
 
I think I am missing something. Software is 8.4(5) and running in Transparent Mode.
 
Inside/Outside are in bridge-group 1. No BVI is configured as we will be using Management0/0 for access.
 
login as: test
test@172.16.252.100's password:
Access denied

[Code].....

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 - Site To Site With Dynamic IP In One Site

Jan 27, 2012

i want configure VPN between backoffice which have ASA5510 firewall with static IP and site which have cisco router 1861 with dynamic IP.
 
how i can configure the site to site between them?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Managing ASA5510 Using ASDM Via Internal Interface

May 17, 2012

I am currently managing an ASA5510 using ASDM through the management port but I would like to manage the ASA through the internal port.
 
My concern is that I thought I remembered reading someplace that if you setup an internal port for management that it can't be used for anything else.  Is this correct?
 
I only configured one internal port and it is the path to my LAN.  I would hate to configure the port for management only to find that I disconnected my firewall from my internal network in the process.  Can I use my one and only configured internal port for both ASA management and route from my LAN thru the ASA firewall?
 
I currently have the management port set to 192.168.1.1 and my internal interface is 10.1.1.1.  If I open ASDM and connect thru the management port and select Configuration/Device Management/Management  Access/ASDM/HTTPS/Telnet/SSH
 
select "ADD"
select access type "ASDM/HTTPS"
select interface "internal"
IP Address   "10.1.1.0"
Mask       "255.255.255.0"
 
Will that give me access to ASA management thru my internal network but cripple my network access to the ASA? 

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 Doesn't Shun Host From Outside Interface

Sep 13, 2011

I've been trying to configure the threat-detection scanning-threat shun feature on my ASA5510 running 8.4(2) for some days now. From searching the support community I can see that I'm not the only one having a problem with this feature. The problem I'm having is that after configuring scanning-threat shun, no outside attacking hosts are being shunned. I'm using nmap to simulate a scanning attack. [code]
 
Is this the expected behavior of scanning-threat shun? If so this feature is of very little use to me as blocking my inside LAN is not my goal. I'm trying to protect my LAN from Internet attack. I can add the except command and exempt my LAN, but this still doesn't fix the problem of outside hosts not being shunned.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 Pairs - Changing External IP And Interface

Mar 27, 2011

We have 2 firewall (ASA5510) pairs. Each pari configured for Active/Stdby mode.
 
Pair1 : Internet browising, Remote access VPN, Citirx access & L2L VPN access
 
For this pair , I need to move the 'outside' interface to Gig 1/3 and change the IP addresses. (minimize the downtime)[code] Remove the ip from outside interface and add the new IP and enable to monitor interface outside?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 - Change Public IP Address On Outside Interface?

Mar 10, 2011

we have two Cisco ASA 5510 in failover configuration.We tried to change the public IP address on the Outside interface of the primary device but it didn't works. The new IP is not reachable from Internet nor pingable from device on the same LAN.The new IP address is in the same subnet of the old IP.

From the switch on which the ASA is connected and from another Cisco PIX we can see the ARP entry. In the analysis, on the old public IP address there was a VPN site-to-site and Webvpn defined.We tried also to shut/no shut the interface and reboot the device.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 - Additional Public IPs Added To Outside Interface

Jul 31, 2012

I have run out of public facing IP addresses and I need more. Assuming I have been issued 1.1.1.0/24 and my new/additional range/subnet issued is 2.2.2/0/24 - Can I carry on with the same configuration on my ASA5510 and just add static NAT for new services in the 2.2.2.0/24 range.

i.e.existing config
route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.254 (upstream ISP)
Interface outside ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
 NAT 2.2.2.1 to 10.1.2.3

or, assume my ISP will deliver 2.2.2.1 to my outside interface (1.1.1.1.1/24) and if my NAT is in place it will get delivered to 10.1.2.3 inside.
or, put another way I dont need change my set-up as I just static route to my ISP!
 
my real public IP is a /27 can I use my broadcast address (its a legit public IP address)?

i.e 1.2.3.0/27 = 1.2.3.1 to 1.2.3.31
Outside interface = 1.2.3.1/27

Can I use 1.2.3.31 and NAT it to an internal server?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Failover On ASA5510 - Reason Of Interface Tests

Jun 24, 2011

Do I correctly understand that when two ASA 5510 are in fail over pair, the switchover from primary to secondary if one interface of primary goes down shall happen ONLY if failover link is up? So when the fail over link is down and one interface on primary got down also,  interface tests between the two ASAs still are being done , but secondary SHALL NEVER try to become active.

In this case why to make  tests on data interfaces ? What is the reason to make them? If the knowledge of that some interfaces  of primary became down comes through failover link - no need to make additional interface tests - primary will tell about the failure to secondary. If so should run no monitor-interface  if name command to dis load devices and network by foolish  tests?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 Static Routes For Management Interface Not Working

Mar 30, 2011

We have several pairs of ASA5510s in failover A/P mode, some running 8.3(2) and others running 8.4(1).
 
e0/0 = outside
e0/1 = inside
m0/0 = management
 
The problem we're having is we can't get anything to route out of the management interface unless we put in a static route at least to the subnet level. For example, we want syslog traffic to exit out m0/0 to our syslog server 10.71.211.79. Our 'gateway of last resort' points to the next hop out e0/0, and a second static route with a higher metric and a more distinct network space is for m0/0 as in:
 
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.49.129 1route management 10.72.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.72.232.94 10
 
This doesn't work, and ASDM loggin gives this error: ".....Routing failed to locate next hop for udp from NP Identity Ifc:10.72.232.89/514 to management:10.72.211.79/514"
 
If I put in a more granular subnet route, or a host route of the syslog server it works, such as:
 
route management 10.72.211.0 255.255.255.0 10.72.232.94 10   <------------- this works
 
route management 10.72.211.79 255.255.255.255 10.72.232.94 10   <------------- this works too
 
Why won't a static route for 10.71.0.0 255.255.0.0 work in this case?
 
We are going to have numerous hosts access and be sent messages though the management interface of these ASAs, and it would be very burdonsome to have to add a host, or even a subnet, route for every one. I've removed all static routes and tried to rely on EIGRP, but that doesn't work. I also had to put 'passive-interface management' under the EIGRP for this to work.
 
Here is the pertinant ASA config concerning syslog, routing, and interfaces:
 
interface Ethernet0/0 nameif outside security-level 0 ip address 192.168.49.140 255.255.255.128 standby 192.168.49.141 !interface Ethernet0/1 nameif inside security-level 100 ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.128 standby

[Code].....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 - Routing / NATing From Internal Network To Outside Interface IP

Jun 3, 2012

I have an ASA5510 running version 8.2(5) I am having an issue with routing/natting from an internal network to the outside interface IP on port 443 which has a nat back in to another internal address. i works externally in from a public address. i also see log messages to do with IP Spoofing

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 ISP Site To Site VPN Failover With Load Balancing

Apr 16, 2011

I have a ASA5510 actve/standby and create one site to site VPN with remote peer ip address xx.xx.xx.xx, Our VPN traffic running on 6 mb internet link for video conferancing traffic.Now client give another link 2 mb internet and client told to us our data traffic runnig on 2 mb link but this data traffic running on the same remote peer IP xx.xx.xx.xx.Secondly request also they need failover over the ISP link.how we implement the same on ASA 5510.

View 0 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Reverse Route Injection On ASA5510 Site-to-site

Jul 29, 2011

We have two ASA5510's connected to two different ISP's and both able to initiate a site-site IPsec connection to a remote site. Depending on the state of the ISP's either ASA may initiate this VPN.We use Reverse Route Injection into OSPF for VPN clients and it works fine with the route being distributed when a client connects and disappearing when there are no clients.So we thought we'd try it for our site-site VPN's. Unfortunately when we enable Reverse Route Injection the routes are distributed regardless of whether the VPN is up or not, so if one ASA has initiated a VPN it's reverse route is distributed (which is what we want) but the other ASA also distributes a route for it's non-existent VPN. The result is that our gateway routers see two OSPF routes and can't ascertain which route is actually up.
 
Is there any way to distribute the route using Reverse Route Injection (or any other method) only when a site-site VPN is actually up? For various reasons we can't use BGP or other gateway routing protocols.Our ASA5510 are currently running IOS 8.2(1)

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Network-access Between ASA5505 And ASA5510 (site-to-site)

May 9, 2011

we set up a site-to-site-vpn between a 5505 and a 5510 (both asa8.3.1). We configured both sides using the VPN-Wizard in the ASDM. When we try to ping from the network behind the 5505 (192.168.45.0/24) to any host behind the 5510 (192.168.0.0/24) the tunnel gets established but the ping doesn't get trough. After that we tried to connect via RDP to any host behind the 5510 and it worked well (same with ssh, telnet,vnc etc.). Now we want to map a network-share on a 2008-Server behind the 5510 but it's not working. In the ASDM-Log I see some "denied by inside-access in"-messages for the ports 139 and 445. Isn't it right that the whole traffic in the vpn-tunnel bypasses the acl? Even if we open both ports we can't connect to the network-share?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Multiple Site To Site IPSec Tunnels To One ASA5510

Dec 4, 2012

Question on ASA VPN tunnels. I have one ASA 5510 in our corporate office, I have two subnets in our corporate office that are configured in the ASA in a Object group. I have a site to site IPSEC tunnel already up and that has been working. I am trying to set up another site to site IPSEC tunnel to a different location that will need to be setup to access the same two subnets. I'm not sure if this can be setup or not, I think I had a problem with setting up two tunnels that were trying to connect to the same subnet but that was between the same two ASA's. Anyways the new tunnel to a new site is not coming up and I want to make sure it is not the subnet issue. The current working tunnel is between two ASA 5510's, the new tunnel we are trying to build is between the ASA and a Sonicwall firewall.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 - Sample Configure VPN Site To Site On ASA 5512-x V.9.1

Mar 18, 2013

sample configer ASA 5512-x v.9.1 for VPN site to Site, i use to configure on ASA 5510 V.8.2 but on ver 9.1 i never configure. my is use that i dont know to how to configure nonat. i saw some configration as in the attach file they just to show configure VPN but we did not see nonot on command.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Configure Site-to-site VPN Using 881 Router On End And Connecting To ASA5510?

Aug 22, 2011

I need to configure a site-to-site VPN using a Cisco 881 router on my end and connecting to an ASA5510 on my suppliers end.Our supplier has configured their end and I do not have access to their configuration.
 
They told us we have to NAT all inside address' to a single address (192.168.89.1) as this is the only one they will let through their firewall/tunnel.I know how to set up the VPN but not too sure how to set up the NAT part.
 
My sanatized config is attached. The code I am using to NAT my inside network to the single address 192.168.89.1, and send all traffic accross the VPN tunnel as this address is correct? With the router running this config the VPN tunnel does not connect.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Site-to-Site VPN ASA5510 - 887VA Dropping Every 20 Seconds

Apr 21, 2013

I have an issue with a site-to-site VPN tunnel between a ASA5510 and 887VA.  I  have two tunnels connected to the ASA and one seems to be affected where by the tunnel is disconnected and brought up around every 20 seconds.  The tunnel is re-established instantly but this break in transmission is causing application issues.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 Site To Site Tunnels Suddenly Goes One-way

May 15, 2011

I have a setup with a pair off ASA5510 on the central site, and approx 20 sites with ASA5505.A couple off network are configured as site to site tunnels to every remote site.Its very stable, but the last year or so ocassionally one of the tunnels go one-way.Just like one of the nat exeptions suddenly stops working.I can see the remote side transmitting packets, but no answer.Central site is running 8.22, want to upgrade but have to mount more RAM.The only cure i have found is to reboot the central pair off ASA5510, not very popular as all 20 tunnels goes down.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Establish Site To Site VPN Between ASA5510 To 5520

Jul 26, 2011

I'm trying to establish site to site VPN between ASA5510 to ASA5520, scenario. [code] our Vendor said to nat the local network to specific ip and use that ip as local pool,here the configuration details [code] i create static nat but its doesn't work for me phase 1 is not up, how to create nat local network to 10.10.10.10.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Establishing Site-to-Site VPN Between ASA5510 And Fortigate1000A?

Feb 8, 2012

I am trying to establish a Site-to-Site VPN to our customer. I am using ASA5510 and the customer was using Fortigate 1000A. The problem that we're having was regarding the IKE Phase 2, I think!. Cisco debug information indicates "All IPSec SA proposals found unacceptable!"

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 / Site To Site Vpn Access Blocked?

Sep 4, 2012

I have two sites connected using ASA5510 version 6.4(5)

   site A                                                     site B
10.8.0.0/20 -- ASA -------internet ------------ASA -- 10.6.0.0/24
 
From site A, i can vnc, rdp, telenet and ssh to site B, however from site B am not able to rdp, vnc telnet or ssh to site A (i can ping site A devices) guess am missing something in the policy but not sure if its in site A or Site B

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Site-to-Site VPN Between C2921 And ASA5510

Jun 25, 2012

I setup site to site VPN between C2921 (site A) and ASA 5510 (site B). I am having problems with SA being deleted:
 
1: I can alwasy initiate VPN connection from Site B to Site A.
2: after VPN tunnel is up and idle for a while, SA is dropped and I lost VPN connection from Site A to Site B.
3: to get the connection back, I have to ping Site A from Site B
4: when the connection is established, it works fine!

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved