I have an ASA5510 running version 8.2(5) I am having an issue with routing/natting from an internal network to the outside interface IP on port 443 which has a nat back in to another internal address. i works externally in from a public address. i also see log messages to do with IP Spoofing
View 1 RepliesI am currently managing an ASA5510 using ASDM through the management port but I would like to manage the ASA through the internal port.
My concern is that I thought I remembered reading someplace that if you setup an internal port for management that it can't be used for anything else. Is this correct?
I only configured one internal port and it is the path to my LAN. I would hate to configure the port for management only to find that I disconnected my firewall from my internal network in the process. Can I use my one and only configured internal port for both ASA management and route from my LAN thru the ASA firewall?
I currently have the management port set to 192.168.1.1 and my internal interface is 10.1.1.1. If I open ASDM and connect thru the management port and select Configuration/Device Management/Management Access/ASDM/HTTPS/Telnet/SSH
select "ADD"
select access type "ASDM/HTTPS"
select interface "internal"
IP Address "10.1.1.0"
Mask "255.255.255.0"
Will that give me access to ASA management thru my internal network but cripple my network access to the ASA?
I have a Cisco ASA 5520 (Ver 8.2(4)) with all four interfaces in use (Public, Private, DMZ, Local offices) and an IPS module, so there are no spare interfaces. I have used all of Public IP's on the current interface for various services (these need one to one mapping, so I can't port map mainly due to SSL certificate issues) and I need to add another Public IP range. The secondary option on ASA interfaces does not exist as on routers/switches and I need to use an additional non contiguous IP address range for additional services advertised on the Public interface that are NAT'd to be servers in my DMZ.
I have seen an example of adding a static arp on the Private interface to allow a secondary gateway to be used for outbound traffic, but I need to allow 14 new IP addresses to be NAT'd from the Public to DMZ and possibly also for outbound NAT'ing (from either Private or DMZ to the Public). I have a L2 switch between the ISP router and the firewall, so using VLAN's is not an option unless the ISP can be persuaded (highly unlikey) to add the seondary IP's as a sub interface with tagging. Anyway if this was actioned then we would have a massive outage on our current IP range during the transistion.
I have a doubt on how do nat 2 internal ip addresses to 1 public ip for FTP uses.
As I know Cisco ASA cannot use to nat 2 internal ips to 1 public ip as the ASA cannot read the host header. It there anyway to control it by using acl or network object group?
My current configuration for nat 1 internal ip to 1 public ip:
static (firewall-dmz,firewall-outside) tcp 210.19.xx.xx 21 172.16.101.11 21 netmask 255.255.255.255 dns
I have an ASA5510 running 8.2 code and I have over 200 static nats from the outside to the inside interface and that is how I expose our systems to the Internet. If this inside interface fails we also have a bypass interface that also terminates on the internal network but I am not sure how the nats will behave given they are statically mapped to the inside.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've a question about VPN IPSEC on ASA5510
In the LAN network , we use a DHCP on a Windows2003Server. Is it Possible to Configure the remote VPN Clients to use this DCHPserver throughout the VPN IPSEC and Assigned Automatically IP when the connection is done?
We recently got a Cisco ASA 5510 Security Appliance and I have some general question.
We have 1 T1 internet connection, and we have 2 internal networks. These 2 internal networks currently hav access to the internet. I am having issues with the 2 internal networks being able to communicate with each other.
Cisco ASA 5510 directly facing the internet on E0/0 (1 Public IP only) with internal LAN on E0/1. Exchange 2010 OWA working fine with ACL and NAT rules configured.Problem:
•1. Cannot publish internal web servers to outside, have tried PAT.
•2. Have multiple web servers to publish with all on one protocol (HTTP) to a single public IP which I don’t know if it’s possible on a ASA.
•3.When SSL VPN is configured with Local user database, connecting from Anyconnect client gives a certificate error. Upon viewing the certificate it points to the internal mail server.
CISCO ASA 5505
Interfaces:
OUTSIDE - 194.50.90.221 255.255.255.0 / security level 0
DMZ - 192.168.12.254 255.255.255.0 / security level 25
INSIDE - 192.168.0.6 255.255.255.0 / security level 50
Now, if I want to ping from the DMZ to INSIDE, I get an error message "no translation group found for icmp src DMZ: ...... dst: INSIDE...."
I fixed is by adding "NAT 0" onto the INSIDE interface so that packets originating from "INSIDE" that are destined for "DMZ" do not get NAT'd.
Now my question is, becasue these are all directly connected networks, how come the firewall does not route the packets, but tries to NAT them instead.
Currently my ASA5510 has a 64MB internal flash. Does the ASA require a higher capacity flash for an IOS upgrade from 7.2(x) to 8.2(x)? The Cisco Release Notes does not state any internal flash requirement, but just wanted to double check.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have ASA5510s and I've configured an SSL VPN using AnyConnect.. The VPN address pool is 10.10.10.0/24 and our internal network is 10.10.20..0/24. After successful login, using LDAP. the client receives a 10.10.10.0/24 address from the pool, but cannot access anything on the internal 10.10.20.0/24 network. I've toyed with access lists and NAT exemption, but to no avail. What do I need to do?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI am using ASA5510 and i want to know if it is possible to redirect http traffic to an internal proxy software. I explain : PC from the LAN use a internal proxy in their IE browser but some other PC doesn't use it.They are directy connected to the Internet using the Public IP from the WAN interface ( via NAT). Can we redirected this HTTP Traffic from the WAN interface to the Proxy in the LAN ?
Http Traffic will be routed like that : PC -> WAN interface -> Proxy -> WAN interface -> Internet In fact,can we create a rule saying : All http traffic which doesn"t come from the IP Proxy must be redirected toward proxy.
I am having a problem getting my ASA to work properly. I attached a diagram for reference and most of the config is below. When I finally got it to route properly between 2 sub nets on the internal network, the NO NAT statement broke routing for the VPN Clients who rely on a NAT statement for the same sub net that is listed in NO NAT access list. I can get one of the 2 to work by replacing NAT statements but can't figure out a combination to allow routing for both the internal sub nets and the VPN clients to work.
It's been about 5 days of tweaking this thing just to get the internal routing to work correctly and when I finally did I broke VPN client access. To note, the VPN clients can still log in and get a session going, they just can't get anywhere once they are in. I also think there's a lot of stuff in this config that is not needed like a lot of the object groups, etc. but I am being very careful about removing anything. I took over support of this ASA after someone else put it in place and over this past weekend we moved it to a new building and new ISP and that is when I had to get it to route between sub nets. The main point of this move was to remove building 1's reliance on building 2 for Internet and outside email access in the event that building 2 is not available (it is close to water and this has happened more than once over the past year).
So that is why I can't go with the smartest option of just keeping the routes on the router in the other building. I also know the 1600s are ancient but they're all we have for now. I can provide those router configs also but they are VERY basic, all static routing. The IP for the Cisco router on the same sub net as the ASA is 192.168.42.254.
This is the statement that allows the routing to work between the 2 internal sub nets but breaks VPN clients: nat (INSIDE) 0 access-list NO NAT
This is the statement that allows the VPN clients to work but breaks the internal routing: nat (INSIDE) 0 access-list INSIDE_nat0_outbound
The rest of the config is below the diagram.
ASA Version 8.2(2)
host name Cisco asa
domain-name default.domain.invalid
enable password - encrypted
password - encrypted
names
dns-guard
[code]...
I have a ASA5510 and I have a question about the speed the ports can handle, here is one port:
-interface Ethernet0/2
- speed 100
-shutdown
- no nameif
-no security-level
-no ip address
it's ethernet and not fastethernet so I figure it will only go to 10Mbps, but at the same time I can hard code the speed to 100.
We have ASA FW 5010 in our organization and we have 4 DMZ's under the DMZ interface on ASA and all DMZ's are created on sub interfaces and assigned different VLANS on each DMZ's.
View 7 Replies View RelatedWe use filter rules on an ASA5510 firewall to direct clients to a web filtering server which generally works very well. However lately we're finding that despite having more web filtering licenses than users, the web filtering licenses are being consumed up, mainly because of a recent increase in the rollout of ipads, iphones, androids etc. We could deploy a proxy server in the wireless DMZ to make all the wireless devices appear to web filter as a single IP, and apply a single policy, but that brings it's own problems. My question is: Is there a way to hide them all behind the interface IP instead, so that all wireless devices appear to the web filter on the LAN as the wireless dmz interface IP rather than the wireless device IP?
View 1 Replies View RelatedOur ASA 5510 is running 8.0(5). We recently upgraded the license from base to security plus. By doing so the capacity of the the external port Ethernet0/0 and Ethernet0/1 should increase from the original FE to GE. But, we were still seeing 100 Mbps on our Ethernet0/0 interface. We figured that out that the provider switch is only supporting 100 Mbps which is a bottleneck for us.The provider will be upgrading there switches to 1 Gb switch.
We will have to swap the switch connections now from 100 Mbps to 1 Gb switch.What commands should we be familar ourself with?Though this will be doine in our maintenace window.All the transaltions/connections will be dropped in our production environment so we are kind of scared.
Recently, I've been having significant problems with denial of service on our ASA-5510. Two IP addresses in particular attack my ASA regularly. What kind of rule do I need to create to deny these IP's access to my firewall?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm currently configuring an ASA5510.I connected a laptop (IP 192.168.96.18/255.255.255.0) to port 0/2 and tried to ping 192.168.100.2 ... impossible to ping outside interface.I resetted the config of the ASA to retest more simple. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedI try to SSH and get access denied.
I try to ASDM and get "Unable to launch device manager from 172.16.252.100"
I think I am missing something. Software is 8.4(5) and running in Transparent Mode.
Inside/Outside are in bridge-group 1. No BVI is configured as we will be using Management0/0 for access.
login as: test
test@172.16.252.100's password:
Access denied
[Code].....
We have a Cisco ASA 5510 with:
-version: asa845-k8.bin
-ASDM: asdm-711-52.bin
Interface "Outside" is a PPPOE configuration.We currently have 36 site to site VPN connections up and running through the "Outside" interface. Now when we try to add, via ASDM, a new site to site VPN connection, we can not choose the "Outside" interface. The interface is just not available. All other interfaces are, bot those are inside interfaces.
I tried running ASDM on a different computer (thought that ASDM or java got corrupted perhaps), but the same problem appeared.Now when we "shutdown" the outside interface and "no shutdown" it again, the "Outside" interface is available again when you add a new site to site VPN profile.
Sidenote: if we check the current profile of a succesful running site to site VPN, it say's that it's using an inside interface. But that is, ofcourse, not possible.
I've been trying to configure the threat-detection scanning-threat shun feature on my ASA5510 running 8.4(2) for some days now. From searching the support community I can see that I'm not the only one having a problem with this feature. The problem I'm having is that after configuring scanning-threat shun, no outside attacking hosts are being shunned. I'm using nmap to simulate a scanning attack. [code]
Is this the expected behavior of scanning-threat shun? If so this feature is of very little use to me as blocking my inside LAN is not my goal. I'm trying to protect my LAN from Internet attack. I can add the except command and exempt my LAN, but this still doesn't fix the problem of outside hosts not being shunned.
We have 2 firewall (ASA5510) pairs. Each pari configured for Active/Stdby mode.
Pair1 : Internet browising, Remote access VPN, Citirx access & L2L VPN access
For this pair , I need to move the 'outside' interface to Gig 1/3 and change the IP addresses. (minimize the downtime)[code] Remove the ip from outside interface and add the new IP and enable to monitor interface outside?
I have two routers on my internal network.
10.10.199.106 is a Cisco ASA5510.
10.10.199.108 is a Sonicwall NSA 3500
The sonicwall handles our site to site VPN tunnels. The Cisco handles our client to site VPN connections.
I have a unit that points to 10.10.199.106 (Cisco) for internet access. All other clients on the network point to 10.10.199.108 (Sonicwall) for internet access.The device in question, a Synology NAS, is using 10.10.199.68 as it's IP address.
I'm trying to hit the web interface on the NAS from a remote site across our VPN tunnel. The IP scheme on the remote end of the VPN tunnel is 192.168.72.0/24.
Going through the VPN, I can hit every object on the network that uses .108 (Sonicwalll) as it's gateway. However, I cannot hit the unit that uses .106 (Cisco) as it's gateway.
I added a route statement (using ASDM) that routes all traffic destined to 192.168.72.0/24 to the Sonicwall so it can send it back down the VPN tunnel. If I'm understanding routing correctly, this should allow responses from NAS destined for 192.168.72.0/24 to go back down the VPN tunnel.
we have two Cisco ASA 5510 in failover configuration.We tried to change the public IP address on the Outside interface of the primary device but it didn't works. The new IP is not reachable from Internet nor pingable from device on the same LAN.The new IP address is in the same subnet of the old IP.
From the switch on which the ASA is connected and from another Cisco PIX we can see the ARP entry. In the analysis, on the old public IP address there was a VPN site-to-site and Webvpn defined.We tried also to shut/no shut the interface and reboot the device.
I have run out of public facing IP addresses and I need more. Assuming I have been issued 1.1.1.0/24 and my new/additional range/subnet issued is 2.2.2/0/24 - Can I carry on with the same configuration on my ASA5510 and just add static NAT for new services in the 2.2.2.0/24 range.
i.e.existing config
route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.254 (upstream ISP)
Interface outside ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
NAT 2.2.2.1 to 10.1.2.3
or, assume my ISP will deliver 2.2.2.1 to my outside interface (1.1.1.1.1/24) and if my NAT is in place it will get delivered to 10.1.2.3 inside.
or, put another way I dont need change my set-up as I just static route to my ISP!
my real public IP is a /27 can I use my broadcast address (its a legit public IP address)?
i.e 1.2.3.0/27 = 1.2.3.1 to 1.2.3.31
Outside interface = 1.2.3.1/27
Can I use 1.2.3.31 and NAT it to an internal server?
Do I correctly understand that when two ASA 5510 are in fail over pair, the switchover from primary to secondary if one interface of primary goes down shall happen ONLY if failover link is up? So when the fail over link is down and one interface on primary got down also, interface tests between the two ASAs still are being done , but secondary SHALL NEVER try to become active.
In this case why to make tests on data interfaces ? What is the reason to make them? If the knowledge of that some interfaces of primary became down comes through failover link - no need to make additional interface tests - primary will tell about the failure to secondary. If so should run no monitor-interface if name command to dis load devices and network by foolish tests?
I have an ASA 5505 with the base license,When I setup the DMZ interface I had to add the deny access to the inside VLAN. The DMZ works fine with WiFi on it, but user's iPhones can't get email unless they turn WiFi off.Is there a simple way to allow HTTPS traffic through the DMZ interface to our internal Exchange server which is NAT'd on the 5505's external IP?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have several pairs of ASA5510s in failover A/P mode, some running 8.3(2) and others running 8.4(1).
e0/0 = outside
e0/1 = inside
m0/0 = management
The problem we're having is we can't get anything to route out of the management interface unless we put in a static route at least to the subnet level. For example, we want syslog traffic to exit out m0/0 to our syslog server 10.71.211.79. Our 'gateway of last resort' points to the next hop out e0/0, and a second static route with a higher metric and a more distinct network space is for m0/0 as in:
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.49.129 1route management 10.72.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.72.232.94 10
This doesn't work, and ASDM loggin gives this error: ".....Routing failed to locate next hop for udp from NP Identity Ifc:10.72.232.89/514 to management:10.72.211.79/514"
If I put in a more granular subnet route, or a host route of the syslog server it works, such as:
route management 10.72.211.0 255.255.255.0 10.72.232.94 10 <------------- this works
route management 10.72.211.79 255.255.255.255 10.72.232.94 10 <------------- this works too
Why won't a static route for 10.71.0.0 255.255.0.0 work in this case?
We are going to have numerous hosts access and be sent messages though the management interface of these ASAs, and it would be very burdonsome to have to add a host, or even a subnet, route for every one. I've removed all static routes and tried to rely on EIGRP, but that doesn't work. I also had to put 'passive-interface management' under the EIGRP for this to work.
Here is the pertinant ASA config concerning syslog, routing, and interfaces:
interface Ethernet0/0 nameif outside security-level 0 ip address 192.168.49.140 255.255.255.128 standby 192.168.49.141 !interface Ethernet0/1 nameif inside security-level 100 ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.128 standby
[Code].....
We recently had a contractor deploy a 4500 catalyst switch with a WS-x45-SUP7-E. After installation and configurations, HP openview is detecting a "downed" interface on the 4500 chassis that is not in the configuration. I have attached an image with the interface circled. We assumed that it may be a configuration issue with openview, however after running diagnostics with a network analyzer, the same ip address for the down interface is still detected. Is this some sort of internal virtual interface on the SUP7?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI've got a 2621 configured as my main gateway to the internet - right now it's obtaining a DHCP ip from a the ISP's proprietary router set to bridged mode.
As of now, I'm unable to ping the internal interface of the router. I can ping external IP's only, even though I have DNS servers listed, i am unable to resolve host names. I'm running a few servers to which people are able to connect to my web server, among other services. I even have a crypto map setup to another 2621 across the country and can ping all internal ips on the other end... I JUST CANNOT PING THE INTERNAL INTERFACE of the router!!
I've noticed that when I ping the router during it's boot process (using linux un-interupted) I get a response in a very short window, then dies again. I'll post my config below:
[code]....
I have just received 4 static ip's from my isp, i want to be able to point these ip's at different services on my internal servers, for example: [code]. The firewall I have is Cisco PIX 515, how to set the NATing up or commands?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am currently trying to apply a reverse NAT on asa 8.2 and not sure how to do this. I have done this on asdm 6.2 for asa 8.3 but the options are not simiar on 8.2. Is there a CLI equivelant?
I am trying to Achieve the object below for any traffic coming from outside interface to the inside interface with any source address to destination 10.X.X.58 then translate it so that it become 192.X.X.X to address 192.X.X.58. This is so that communications can traverse internal network as the server is not ona DMZ.
I have done this on 8.3 (shown below) but do not know if it is possible for 8.2, I have tried replicating the same command on 8.2 but commands are not recognised.
nat (outside,any) source static any 192.X.X.X destination static 10.X.X.X 192.X.X.58
Should I just upgrade to 8.3? never done it before so not sure of the consequences.