Our ASA 5510 is running 8.0(5). We recently upgraded the license from base to security plus. By doing so the capacity of the the external port Ethernet0/0 and Ethernet0/1 should increase from the original FE to GE. But, we were still seeing 100 Mbps on our Ethernet0/0 interface. We figured that out that the provider switch is only supporting 100 Mbps which is a bottleneck for us.The provider will be upgrading there switches to 1 Gb switch.
We will have to swap the switch connections now from 100 Mbps to 1 Gb switch.What commands should we be familar ourself with?Though this will be doine in our maintenace window.All the transaltions/connections will be dropped in our production environment so we are kind of scared.
We have ASA FW 5010 in our organization and we have 4 DMZ's under the DMZ interface on ASA and all DMZ's are created on sub interfaces and assigned different VLANS on each DMZ's.
We use filter rules on an ASA5510 firewall to direct clients to a web filtering server which generally works very well. However lately we're finding that despite having more web filtering licenses than users, the web filtering licenses are being consumed up, mainly because of a recent increase in the rollout of ipads, iphones, androids etc. We could deploy a proxy server in the wireless DMZ to make all the wireless devices appear to web filter as a single IP, and apply a single policy, but that brings it's own problems. My question is: Is there a way to hide them all behind the interface IP instead, so that all wireless devices appear to the web filter on the LAN as the wireless dmz interface IP rather than the wireless device IP?
Recently, I've been having significant problems with denial of service on our ASA-5510. Two IP addresses in particular attack my ASA regularly. What kind of rule do I need to create to deny these IP's access to my firewall?
I'm currently configuring an ASA5510.I connected a laptop (IP 192.168.96.18/255.255.255.0) to port 0/2 and tried to ping 192.168.100.2 ... impossible to ping outside interface.I resetted the config of the ASA to retest more simple. [code]
We have a Cisco ASA 5510 with: -version: asa845-k8.bin -ASDM: asdm-711-52.bin
Interface "Outside" is a PPPOE configuration.We currently have 36 site to site VPN connections up and running through the "Outside" interface. Now when we try to add, via ASDM, a new site to site VPN connection, we can not choose the "Outside" interface. The interface is just not available. All other interfaces are, bot those are inside interfaces.
I tried running ASDM on a different computer (thought that ASDM or java got corrupted perhaps), but the same problem appeared.Now when we "shutdown" the outside interface and "no shutdown" it again, the "Outside" interface is available again when you add a new site to site VPN profile.
Sidenote: if we check the current profile of a succesful running site to site VPN, it say's that it's using an inside interface. But that is, ofcourse, not possible.
I am currently managing an ASA5510 using ASDM through the management port but I would like to manage the ASA through the internal port.
My concern is that I thought I remembered reading someplace that if you setup an internal port for management that it can't be used for anything else. Is this correct?
I only configured one internal port and it is the path to my LAN. I would hate to configure the port for management only to find that I disconnected my firewall from my internal network in the process. Can I use my one and only configured internal port for both ASA management and route from my LAN thru the ASA firewall?
I currently have the management port set to 192.168.1.1 and my internal interface is 10.1.1.1. If I open ASDM and connect thru the management port and select Configuration/Device Management/Management Access/ASDM/HTTPS/Telnet/SSH
select "ADD" select access type "ASDM/HTTPS" select interface "internal" IP Address "10.1.1.0" Mask "255.255.255.0"
Will that give me access to ASA management thru my internal network but cripple my network access to the ASA?
I've been trying to configure the threat-detection scanning-threat shun feature on my ASA5510 running 8.4(2) for some days now. From searching the support community I can see that I'm not the only one having a problem with this feature. The problem I'm having is that after configuring scanning-threat shun, no outside attacking hosts are being shunned. I'm using nmap to simulate a scanning attack. [code]
Is this the expected behavior of scanning-threat shun? If so this feature is of very little use to me as blocking my inside LAN is not my goal. I'm trying to protect my LAN from Internet attack. I can add the except command and exempt my LAN, but this still doesn't fix the problem of outside hosts not being shunned.
For this pair , I need to move the 'outside' interface to Gig 1/3 and change the IP addresses. (minimize the downtime)[code] Remove the ip from outside interface and add the new IP and enable to monitor interface outside?
The sonicwall handles our site to site VPN tunnels. The Cisco handles our client to site VPN connections.
I have a unit that points to 10.10.199.106 (Cisco) for internet access. All other clients on the network point to 10.10.199.108 (Sonicwall) for internet access.The device in question, a Synology NAS, is using 10.10.199.68 as it's IP address.
I'm trying to hit the web interface on the NAS from a remote site across our VPN tunnel. The IP scheme on the remote end of the VPN tunnel is 192.168.72.0/24.
Going through the VPN, I can hit every object on the network that uses .108 (Sonicwalll) as it's gateway. However, I cannot hit the unit that uses .106 (Cisco) as it's gateway.
I added a route statement (using ASDM) that routes all traffic destined to 192.168.72.0/24 to the Sonicwall so it can send it back down the VPN tunnel. If I'm understanding routing correctly, this should allow responses from NAS destined for 192.168.72.0/24 to go back down the VPN tunnel.
we have two Cisco ASA 5510 in failover configuration.We tried to change the public IP address on the Outside interface of the primary device but it didn't works. The new IP is not reachable from Internet nor pingable from device on the same LAN.The new IP address is in the same subnet of the old IP.
From the switch on which the ASA is connected and from another Cisco PIX we can see the ARP entry. In the analysis, on the old public IP address there was a VPN site-to-site and Webvpn defined.We tried also to shut/no shut the interface and reboot the device.
I have run out of public facing IP addresses and I need more. Assuming I have been issued 1.1.1.0/24 and my new/additional range/subnet issued is 2.2.2/0/24 - Can I carry on with the same configuration on my ASA5510 and just add static NAT for new services in the 2.2.2.0/24 range.
i.e.existing config route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.254 (upstream ISP) Interface outside ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 NAT 2.2.2.1 to 10.1.2.3
or, assume my ISP will deliver 2.2.2.1 to my outside interface (1.1.1.1.1/24) and if my NAT is in place it will get delivered to 10.1.2.3 inside. or, put another way I dont need change my set-up as I just static route to my ISP!
my real public IP is a /27 can I use my broadcast address (its a legit public IP address)?
i.e 1.2.3.0/27 = 1.2.3.1 to 1.2.3.31 Outside interface = 1.2.3.1/27
Can I use 1.2.3.31 and NAT it to an internal server?
Do I correctly understand that when two ASA 5510 are in fail over pair, the switchover from primary to secondary if one interface of primary goes down shall happen ONLY if failover link is up? So when the fail over link is down and one interface on primary got down also, interface tests between the two ASAs still are being done , but secondary SHALL NEVER try to become active.
In this case why to make tests on data interfaces ? What is the reason to make them? If the knowledge of that some interfaces of primary became down comes through failover link - no need to make additional interface tests - primary will tell about the failure to secondary. If so should run no monitor-interface if name command to dis load devices and network by foolish tests?
We have several pairs of ASA5510s in failover A/P mode, some running 8.3(2) and others running 8.4(1).
e0/0 = outside e0/1 = inside m0/0 = management
The problem we're having is we can't get anything to route out of the management interface unless we put in a static route at least to the subnet level. For example, we want syslog traffic to exit out m0/0 to our syslog server 10.71.211.79. Our 'gateway of last resort' points to the next hop out e0/0, and a second static route with a higher metric and a more distinct network space is for m0/0 as in:
This doesn't work, and ASDM loggin gives this error: ".....Routing failed to locate next hop for udp from NP Identity Ifc:10.72.232.89/514 to management:10.72.211.79/514"
If I put in a more granular subnet route, or a host route of the syslog server it works, such as:
route management 10.72.211.0 255.255.255.0 10.72.232.94 10 <------------- this works
route management 10.72.211.79 255.255.255.255 10.72.232.94 10 <------------- this works too
Why won't a static route for 10.71.0.0 255.255.0.0 work in this case?
We are going to have numerous hosts access and be sent messages though the management interface of these ASAs, and it would be very burdonsome to have to add a host, or even a subnet, route for every one. I've removed all static routes and tried to rely on EIGRP, but that doesn't work. I also had to put 'passive-interface management' under the EIGRP for this to work.
Here is the pertinant ASA config concerning syslog, routing, and interfaces:
I have an ASA5510 running version 8.2(5) I am having an issue with routing/natting from an internal network to the outside interface IP on port 443 which has a nat back in to another internal address. i works externally in from a public address. i also see log messages to do with IP Spoofing
I have a monitoring rule that checks the number of connections on the firewall using the following command: show conn count
My results are always between 3,000 and 9,000.A while back, I had an issue where all 130,000 connections were being used up. I configured a service policy to limit the number of connections between any two end points.
I'm monitoring the error logs and I'm noticing that my connection limit rule is being triggered on a regular basis. I receive the following message.Per-client connection limit exceeded 20000/20000 for output packet from x.x.x.x to x.x.x.x on interface outside
I'm confused as to the difference between the connections limited by my rule and the connections shown by "show conn count". why I never see any connections higher than 9,000 using "show conn count" yet I am seeing alerts stating that the firewall has reached 20000 connections?My firewall is an ASA5510 running.
I have ASA 5510 with 8.2.4 and 8.0.x OS and all seem to have common problem of idle TCP connections not timing out. The host to host connections are coming over VPN tunnels. I have default timeouts on all the firewalls. I have tried changing global timeouts and as well as host specific timeouts using MPF but doesn't work at all ! The problem is when TCP connections are sitting idle in conn table for days and when connection limit of 50,000 conns reach the firewall starts behaving unpredictably dropping packets or unresponsive! I need the unused idle connections to timeout which is NOT happening either by changing global values or MPF.
Actually all service from site to site is permitted, without restriction.I want to insert an ASA to block some internet traffic on main site.I try to configure my ASA5510.No problem for outgoing connection or to permit a single service on main site.But impossible to give access to all service/connection from all remote site to main site. [code]
I Changed my old firewall by an ASA5510, since that change my internet connexion is slower.Some websites takes longer to display.I would like to know if there are some specific configuration about TCP connection or DNS to setup?
I just configured the ISP DNS :
Dns server-group DefaultDNSname-server 194.2.0.20 name-server 194.2.0.50
I am connecting the inside interface to an upstream switch and therefore will need to assign a static IP address to the inside address as I did below:
#sho int ip brief Vlan1 123.123.123.123 YES manual up up
I will also use this to manage the ASA. I am having a problem with the network configuration of the inside interface as I can't ping the gateway and/or the in IP of the inside interface.Do I need to add any routes?
I 've got some problem with my Mail Server since I've migrated to an ASA5510.Actually the server is in a DMZ with a private Ip ( 10.x.x.2) and it is translated to a Public IP ( 194.x.x.65).Some Users received in there mailbox a system administor error message :Object : Impossible to deliver : testYour message could not be deliver to one or more of its recipients: 421 SMTP connection went away!When they try to re sent it some times later, message is sent whithout problem.
We lost connectivity to the web user interface - it no longer responds on the configured IP address.From the manual we see that by default the switch get its IP address via DHCP - but we find no record of any ip address assigned to this switch.Is there a IP address that this unit defaults to when DHCP is not available? Also - what is the best way to connect to the console using Windows 7?
I have a pair of 5505's in transparent mode and connected them to C2960S. The inside interface (which is VLAN5 on the switchport) keeps dropping, going in to error state. There is no log reference in the switch and the interface shows as UP. The standby ASA has no problem, both interfaces on the switch is up. As soon as I failover the units over, the active node inside interfaces drops.
I am switching a switch connecting to the ASA5550 tomorrow. My current switch is using fiber connecting to the ASA. The new one only support copper. If I switch between fiber to copper on the ASA (change media-type command on interface) will it cause a down time? I have VPN tunnel on the ASA and don't want the session to reset.
ASA 5510 have two model Bun-K9 and Sec-Bun-K9 from the datasheet find out difference Port related and Redundancy. My questions is : Have any major difference for Security service between two model ?
I am replacing an old Fw with a New ASA 5510 and I have a problem with a TCP Connection on My LAN InterfaceI joined a picture of what I want to do. [code] From the PC,I can Ping the Video Camera But I can't connect to it with HTTP.I don't understand, Packet Tracert allow the Http packet too. [code]
so i have a ASA 5510. The ASA is Connect with the Internet through PPOE DSL MODEM
The outside Interface get an IP. The Inside Interface get through DHCP from the ASA the Internet DNS SERVER (T-Online) But the HOST do not connect to the Internet because the DNS Server is timed out
We have ASA 5520 firewall.For broadband Internet access, we have T1 Router(edge router provided by ISP) which provides public IP's 198.24.210.224 / 29. We have usable public IP's 198.24.210.226 - 198.24.210.230 with default gateway 198.24.210.225. We assigned 198.24.210.230 255.255.255.0 to the outside interface.
If we connect the ASA 5520 outside interface directly to T1 router, can all packets with destination addresses 198.24.210.224/29 reach the outside interface without using other device like another router or switches?I just assume that only packets with destination address 198.24.210.230(outside interface ip) can reach the outside interface from the edge router.Is it wrong assumption? If it is correct, then is there any way to route all packets with destination address 198.24.210.224/29 to the outside interface?
on the outside interface i cant perform the command ip address dhcp setroute.I get the error: IP and subnetmask form invalid pair indicating broadcast or network address.The commands are there when I do the ? command. It just will not accept the command with or without dhcp.I am trying to test an ASA-5510 as a 4G failover to our ASA-5520. This is Verizon's solution but they did not provide IPs, they use passthru on the 4G modem so I'm trying to set up dhcp. It worked a few days ago. Not sure what Im missing. The IP I got last time from Verizon was 192.168.0.199.
