Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 Cannot Connect To Site Through Appliance

Mar 22, 2011

I have an @Remote appliance through Ricoh for our copiers.  This appliance connects to their site to transfer meter readings and other information.  This appliance can't connect to their site to transmit data.  Ricoh is telling me the problem is on our firewill.  I have assigned the Ricoh appliance a static IP address in our network.  Our firewall is a Cisco ASA 5510.  I don't have much expereince with logging on the ASA, so I'm not sure what "teardown dynamic TCP translation from inside" means.  Is there something that is preventing this IP from contacting the Ricoh site? [code]

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 - Adaptive Security Appliance

Mar 20, 2011

I m getting mention error when try to open subjected web link.
 
Deny TCP (no connection) from Outside:180.87.10.44/2443 (180.87.10.44/2443) to DMZ-1:a.b.c.d/1594 (w.x.y.z/17964) with follow explanations.
 
"The adaptive security appliance discarded a TCP packet that has no associated connection in the adaptive security appliance connection table. The adaptive security appliance looks for a SYN flag in the packet, which indicates a request to establish a new connection. If the SYN flag is not set, and there is not an existing connection, the adaptive security appliance discards the packet."
 
Where, a.b.c.d = our private ip address (Natted) w.x.y.z  = Public Ip address.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 Configured One Site To VPN

Feb 10, 2013

i have  cisco  ASA5510  Firewall and  configured   one  site to VPN . i  want  to   configure  another  s2s vpn  in  the FW for  another  Site location.what  to  in the existing  Firewall  so that  2  site to site  vpn  can work.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 8.4(5) Outside PPPOE Interface Not Available In Site

May 13, 2013

We have a Cisco ASA 5510 with:
-version: asa845-k8.bin
-ASDM: asdm-711-52.bin
 
Interface "Outside" is a PPPOE configuration.We currently have 36 site to site VPN connections up and running through the "Outside" interface. Now when we try to add, via ASDM, a new site to site VPN connection, we can not choose the "Outside" interface. The interface is just not available. All other interfaces are, bot those are inside interfaces.
 
I tried running ASDM on a different computer (thought that ASDM or java got corrupted perhaps), but the same problem appeared.Now when we "shutdown" the outside interface and "no shutdown" it again, the "Outside" interface is available again when you add a new site to site VPN profile.
 
Sidenote: if we check the current profile of a succesful running site to site VPN, it say's that it's using an inside interface. But that is, ofcourse, not possible.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 - Web Interface On NAS From Remote Site Across VPN Tunnel?

Dec 3, 2012

I have two routers on my internal network.

10.10.199.106 is a Cisco ASA5510.

10.10.199.108 is a Sonicwall NSA 3500
 
The sonicwall handles our site to site VPN tunnels.  The Cisco handles our client to site VPN connections.
 
I have a unit that points to 10.10.199.106 (Cisco) for internet access.  All other clients on the network point to 10.10.199.108 (Sonicwall) for internet access.The device in question, a Synology NAS, is using 10.10.199.68 as it's IP address.
 
I'm trying to hit the web interface on the NAS from a remote site across our VPN tunnel.  The IP scheme on the remote end of the VPN tunnel is 192.168.72.0/24.
 
Going through the VPN, I can hit every object on the network that uses .108 (Sonicwalll) as it's gateway.  However, I cannot hit the unit that uses .106 (Cisco) as it's gateway. 
 
I added a route statement (using ASDM) that routes all traffic destined to 192.168.72.0/24 to the Sonicwall so it can send it back down the VPN tunnel.  If I'm understanding routing correctly, this should allow responses from NAS destined for 192.168.72.0/24 to go back down the VPN tunnel.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 - Site To Site With Dynamic IP In One Site

Jan 27, 2012

i want configure VPN between backoffice which have ASA5510 firewall with static IP and site which have cisco router 1861 with dynamic IP.
 
how i can configure the site to site between them?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 ISP Site To Site VPN Failover With Load Balancing

Apr 16, 2011

I have a ASA5510 actve/standby and create one site to site VPN with remote peer ip address xx.xx.xx.xx, Our VPN traffic running on 6 mb internet link for video conferancing traffic.Now client give another link 2 mb internet and client told to us our data traffic runnig on 2 mb link but this data traffic running on the same remote peer IP xx.xx.xx.xx.Secondly request also they need failover over the ISP link.how we implement the same on ASA 5510.

View 0 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Reverse Route Injection On ASA5510 Site-to-site

Jul 29, 2011

We have two ASA5510's connected to two different ISP's and both able to initiate a site-site IPsec connection to a remote site. Depending on the state of the ISP's either ASA may initiate this VPN.We use Reverse Route Injection into OSPF for VPN clients and it works fine with the route being distributed when a client connects and disappearing when there are no clients.So we thought we'd try it for our site-site VPN's. Unfortunately when we enable Reverse Route Injection the routes are distributed regardless of whether the VPN is up or not, so if one ASA has initiated a VPN it's reverse route is distributed (which is what we want) but the other ASA also distributes a route for it's non-existent VPN. The result is that our gateway routers see two OSPF routes and can't ascertain which route is actually up.
 
Is there any way to distribute the route using Reverse Route Injection (or any other method) only when a site-site VPN is actually up? For various reasons we can't use BGP or other gateway routing protocols.Our ASA5510 are currently running IOS 8.2(1)

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Network-access Between ASA5505 And ASA5510 (site-to-site)

May 9, 2011

we set up a site-to-site-vpn between a 5505 and a 5510 (both asa8.3.1). We configured both sides using the VPN-Wizard in the ASDM. When we try to ping from the network behind the 5505 (192.168.45.0/24) to any host behind the 5510 (192.168.0.0/24) the tunnel gets established but the ping doesn't get trough. After that we tried to connect via RDP to any host behind the 5510 and it worked well (same with ssh, telnet,vnc etc.). Now we want to map a network-share on a 2008-Server behind the 5510 but it's not working. In the ASDM-Log I see some "denied by inside-access in"-messages for the ports 139 and 445. Isn't it right that the whole traffic in the vpn-tunnel bypasses the acl? Even if we open both ports we can't connect to the network-share?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Multiple Site To Site IPSec Tunnels To One ASA5510

Dec 4, 2012

Question on ASA VPN tunnels. I have one ASA 5510 in our corporate office, I have two subnets in our corporate office that are configured in the ASA in a Object group. I have a site to site IPSEC tunnel already up and that has been working. I am trying to set up another site to site IPSEC tunnel to a different location that will need to be setup to access the same two subnets. I'm not sure if this can be setup or not, I think I had a problem with setting up two tunnels that were trying to connect to the same subnet but that was between the same two ASA's. Anyways the new tunnel to a new site is not coming up and I want to make sure it is not the subnet issue. The current working tunnel is between two ASA 5510's, the new tunnel we are trying to build is between the ASA and a Sonicwall firewall.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 - Sample Configure VPN Site To Site On ASA 5512-x V.9.1

Mar 18, 2013

sample configer ASA 5512-x v.9.1 for VPN site to Site, i use to configure on ASA 5510 V.8.2 but on ver 9.1 i never configure. my is use that i dont know to how to configure nonat. i saw some configration as in the attach file they just to show configure VPN but we did not see nonot on command.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Configure Site-to-site VPN Using 881 Router On End And Connecting To ASA5510?

Aug 22, 2011

I need to configure a site-to-site VPN using a Cisco 881 router on my end and connecting to an ASA5510 on my suppliers end.Our supplier has configured their end and I do not have access to their configuration.
 
They told us we have to NAT all inside address' to a single address (192.168.89.1) as this is the only one they will let through their firewall/tunnel.I know how to set up the VPN but not too sure how to set up the NAT part.
 
My sanatized config is attached. The code I am using to NAT my inside network to the single address 192.168.89.1, and send all traffic accross the VPN tunnel as this address is correct? With the router running this config the VPN tunnel does not connect.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Site-to-Site VPN ASA5510 - 887VA Dropping Every 20 Seconds

Apr 21, 2013

I have an issue with a site-to-site VPN tunnel between a ASA5510 and 887VA.  I  have two tunnels connected to the ASA and one seems to be affected where by the tunnel is disconnected and brought up around every 20 seconds.  The tunnel is re-established instantly but this break in transmission is causing application issues.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 Site To Site Tunnels Suddenly Goes One-way

May 15, 2011

I have a setup with a pair off ASA5510 on the central site, and approx 20 sites with ASA5505.A couple off network are configured as site to site tunnels to every remote site.Its very stable, but the last year or so ocassionally one of the tunnels go one-way.Just like one of the nat exeptions suddenly stops working.I can see the remote side transmitting packets, but no answer.Central site is running 8.22, want to upgrade but have to mount more RAM.The only cure i have found is to reboot the central pair off ASA5510, not very popular as all 20 tunnels goes down.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Establish Site To Site VPN Between ASA5510 To 5520

Jul 26, 2011

I'm trying to establish site to site VPN between ASA5510 to ASA5520, scenario. [code] our Vendor said to nat the local network to specific ip and use that ip as local pool,here the configuration details [code] i create static nat but its doesn't work for me phase 1 is not up, how to create nat local network to 10.10.10.10.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Establishing Site-to-Site VPN Between ASA5510 And Fortigate1000A?

Feb 8, 2012

I am trying to establish a Site-to-Site VPN to our customer. I am using ASA5510 and the customer was using Fortigate 1000A. The problem that we're having was regarding the IKE Phase 2, I think!. Cisco debug information indicates "All IPSec SA proposals found unacceptable!"

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 / Site To Site Vpn Access Blocked?

Sep 4, 2012

I have two sites connected using ASA5510 version 6.4(5)

   site A                                                     site B
10.8.0.0/20 -- ASA -------internet ------------ASA -- 10.6.0.0/24
 
From site A, i can vnc, rdp, telenet and ssh to site B, however from site B am not able to rdp, vnc telnet or ssh to site A (i can ping site A devices) guess am missing something in the policy but not sure if its in site A or Site B

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Site-to-Site VPN Between C2921 And ASA5510

Jun 25, 2012

I setup site to site VPN between C2921 (site A) and ASA 5510 (site B). I am having problems with SA being deleted:
 
1: I can alwasy initiate VPN connection from Site B to Site A.
2: after VPN tunnel is up and idle for a while, SA is dropped and I lost VPN connection from Site A to Site B.
3: to get the connection back, I have to ping Site A from Site B
4: when the connection is established, it works fine!

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 Site-to-Site VPN Same LAN Subnets

Jan 21, 2013

I am setting up a VPN between my client and their owner, in order for the owner to access ressources at my clients site.Unfortunatly their owner already has an VPN connection to another site with the same subnet as the one on my clients site.I have setup a policy NAT to translate my clients internal LAN to a "NAT" LAN, and i can ping from my clients LAN to their owners LAN, but their owner can not reach any ressources at my clients LAN.
 
My client has a ASA5510 with a base license, but their owner has their firewall and routing "leased" or something like that, it actually was their ISP who configured the VPN settings. That means of course that i have very limited (no) access to the other site's firewall and I actually even dont know make and model of it.
 
And last but not least, the subnet the Owner needs to access is on my clients Core Switch and the ASA has an internal route to it.I have pasted in a interresting parts of the ASA config here below, the displayed subnets are not the real ones . [code]

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: ASA5510- Site-to-site Using DNS Name

May 31, 2011

I have some home office setups that have s2s VPNs which terminate on my netscreen SSG5.  I am moving off the SSG and onto an ASA5510 but not sure if or how I can make this work?  The end users do not have static IPs at this point.  I use dyn dns on their home routers to update their DHCP IPs from the providers.  If they can't get static IPs how can I specify the peer ID with a DNS name rather than IP address?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 - Connect Two 10.10.10.x Networks Using NAT

Dec 26, 2012

I've got an ASA5510 with an IPS/IDS module.  Because of a merger, I've got two 10.10.10.x networks (West and Central).   I'd like all West traffic to be IPS checked before going into Central.  Once it goes into Central, it's out of my hands.   Can I set up NAT to accomplish this?
 
Again, the traffic flow would be from West (10.10.10.1) through the ASA/IPS, and then to Central (10.10.10.1).  
 
Is this possible?  If not, do I need another router?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 - Connect 2 Internal Networks

Apr 26, 2011

We recently got a Cisco ASA 5510 Security Appliance and I have some general question.

We have 1 T1 internet connection, and we have 2 internal networks.  These 2 internal networks currently hav access to the internet.  I am having issues with the 2 internal networks being able to communicate with each other.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5510 / IPS SSM Could Not Connect To SMTP Host

Sep 3, 2011

We have an ASA5510 with the IPS ASA-SSM-10 module installed. All is working well except event notification. When sending a test email from the SSM IPS, we get the error "could not connect to SMTP host". The Exchange SMTP host does allow traffic from the IPS and ASA. I can ping to the SMTP host by IP and name. What am I missing here?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: How To Connect To WAN Port On ASA5510 To Test Before Deployment

Oct 5, 2011

I've cloned the configuration off one of my ASA5510's to another 5510 to use as a template for a new data center deploy. I have configured the new firewalls networks and rules, and of course changed the WAN IP config to its new setting.
 
I want to test the firewall in y office before I deploy it. How should I configure my Macbooks ethernet configuraiton to test the firewall?, as I have tried without success to connect to it.
 
Let's say that my WAN configuration is 134.5.169.98/255.255.255.224 with a static route of IP address 0.0.0.0, Netmask 0.0.0.0 and a gateway IP of 134.5.169.97.
 
I've tried setting the route to force all traffic through the interface (sudo route add 0.0.0.0/1 134.5.169.98), but that did not work either. A trace route to the external interface IP of the firewall (or the external IP of an expose server) get's a "no route to host" error.
 
I've tried many configurations and have not been able to access the internal servers/services/VPN at all.I've also tried with a cross over, and straight through cables.
 
What should I configure my macbooks network configuration as so I can connect directly to the WAN port to test external access to the internal servers/services and test the VPN client?

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Application :: ACE4710 Appliance To ANM Virtual Appliance NATed

Oct 12, 2011

We have an ACE Appliance in a DMZ and the ACE Appliance's Admin Context IP is translated between ACE and ANM. The ANM Server does not get translated. It is just the opposite then in another Community discussion.
 
Our Problem: When adding the ACE4710 Appliance to the ANM imported Device List, we use the ACE's NATed Admin Context IP. Import works well, but ANM reflects the Admin Context IP with it's real configured IP. Polling the ACE Appliance does not work therefore.
 
Is there a possibility of telling the ANM, that the ACE has to be polled through a NATed IP? I could not find a field to set a NATed Mgmt IP.
 
Configured IP on ACE Admin Context: 192.168.0.10
NATed ACE Admin  Context IP:           172.16.0.10
 
Imported ACE with IP 172.16.0.10 into ANM, but ANM polls for Rserver, Vserver, Probes, etc. via 192.168.0.10 - which is not reachable from the ANM.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Support Of Jumbo Frames On ASA 5500 Firewall Appliance?

Feb 28, 2010

Can any ASA 5500 in particular the ASA5510 firewall support jumbo frames (i.e. greater than the default standard 1500 Bytes frames)?. I plan to use the ASAs to setup a point-to-point IPSec tunnel and need an Application frame of 4Kbytes intact and not segment it.I have done little checking on the Cisco Website and see it mention of Jumbo frames on the 5580 on 10Gig interface but didn't see mention 5510. 5580s are way over-kill and expensive for what I need is to run a mission critical one IPSec point-to-point with maximum of no more than 100Kbps so 5510 is perfect for me but not sure if it can carry the jumbo frame?
 
On the routers and switches it's the MTU settings and they are configurable per interface and I am OK and the circuit is T1 which the Telcos said it's OK since it's physical layer so the only unkown is the firewall.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Difference ASA5510-BUN-K9 And ASA5510-Sec-Bun-K9

Jun 6, 2012

ASA 5510 have two model Bun-K9 and Sec-Bun-K9 from the datasheet find out difference Port related and Redundancy. My questions is : Have any major difference for Security service between two model ?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 - Latency Through IPsec Vpn Site Tunnel

Apr 26, 2012

I have an asa 5510 that has many(17)ipsec vpn site tunnels on it.  One of the tunnels, one running to a c1900isr at the other end, is experiencing 400 to 500ms latency through it.  It does appear to be the tunnel only because there is no latency to the internet.  I cleared the tunnel group out and readded it to no effect.  isp says everything fine.  any other known causes for this

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Extend Production VLAN Behind ASA5510 To Remote Site And 2821?

Feb 24, 2011

I have an ASA 5510 and would like to extend one of the subnets behind this ASA out to my house that has a cable modem, a wireless router/switch and then behind that I have a 2821 router.  I've been reading and it looks like L2TP may be the way to go but can't find and config examples.  Again, I would like to securely extend one and nail up a permanent connection of one of the VLANs in the production network all the way into my house using my cable modem and the 2821.  Any config examples!  Also, any IOS recommendations for the 2821.  Lastly, does L2TP look like the way I need to go?  I'm attaching a very basic Visio diagram of what I'm trying to do. 

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 2901 / 2921 / 5505 ASA - Router Versus Firewall Site To Site VPN?

May 30, 2013

I would like to know both Cisco 2901 or 2921 router and Cisco 5505 ASA can build site to site VPN.
 
1) what is the different to build site to site VPN between router and firewall ?

2) which is the best choice if using in site to site VPN connection ? 

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 / Site To Site VPN Using Public Addresses On Local Network

Jul 28, 2011

I have a request to establish a site to site VPN with a customer. While collecting the information I give them our local network subnet which is a private subnet (192.168.5.0). They asked me if I could give them a public address instead. They can not work with the 192.168.5 subnet. Is this possible?
 
My side of the VPN is an ASA 5505 running 8.2(2). The other side i believe is a Checkpoint.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 Site To Site RTP Traffic Is Hitting Deny All Rule?

Aug 13, 2012

Got an ASA5505 connected to another endpoint running IPsec and being NAT'd at each end to a 10.0.0.0/24 network. I can pass other types of traffic through the ASA 5505 but not RTP traffic. The moment it is NAT'd and hits the firewall rules it gets denied by the default deny at the bottom of the list.

Currently the rules are as follows
 
 Incoming External
allow ip any any
allow tcp any any
allow udp any any
default deny

 [code].....
 
It wont allow us to setup a voip call...however when the same call manager sets up a voip call NOT using this ipsec tunnel it works just fine.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 Identity NAT Configuration For Remote Access VPN And Site-to-Site

Mar 9, 2011

I am try to configure ASA 5510 with 8.3 IOS version.My internal users are 192.168.2.0/24 and i configured dynamic PAT and are all internet .

i want configure identity NAT for remote access VPN.Remote users IP pool is 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10
 
i know to configure NAT exemption in IOS 7.2 version. But here IOS 8.3 version. configure NAT exemption for 192.168.2.0/24 to my remote pool( 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10).

View 6 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved