If you look at the data sheet for the 5512-X the High Availability section states "Not Supported; ActiveActive or ActiveStandby" while the ASA 5515-X states "ActiveActive or ActiveStandby". What does "Not Supported" mean for the ASA 5512-X? Does this mean HA does not work, or that I need to purchase an additional license to use the HA feature?
[URL]
I am having an issue where I can't connect to VPN after upgrading the license. The license upgraded is related to AnyConnect VPN. I noticed from the newly upgraded license, the Encryption-3DES-AES is disabled whereas previously it was enabled.
ASA 5512-K9
Version 8.6(1)2
I have a Cisco 2921 router running c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.150-1.M4.bin.Its licensed for ipbase, ipbasek9, Permanent and uc,uck9,Permanent (I'm using the router as a voice gateway),I'm looking to update the IOS to c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.150-1.M5.bin as I'm told it has a fix for some DSP problems.So the question is, do I need to obtain a new license key to apply this update or am I covered by the existing license on the router.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI've enabled Cisco "Anyconnect Premium Peers" for client less ssl vpn connections, the obvious catch is that for ikev2 Anyconnect sessions it wants to use up the SSL license pool instead of the IPSEC pool (which I have lots of connection licenses for "Total VPN Peers : 250".
* Is there any way to configure Anyconnect to connect via IPSEC and use an IPSEC license (while keeping the Anyconnect Premium Peers enabled)?
* Do I have to consider 3rd party vpn clients, outside Anyconnect?
I have a small office with about 20 people. I currently have a T1 line which feeds a Cisco ASA 5505. I would like to replace the T1 line with two (2) ADSL lines. I need a dual WAN switch/load balancer. I researched a bit and found that Cisco RV042 will probably work for me even though I don't need another VPN and would have to disable it.
My question: Is there anothe device from Cisco or others which will give me the dual WAN and load balancing but not the VPN piece. My assumption is that it would be a less expensive device if such an animal exists.
What's the difference between VPN Plus license and Security Plus license. I have new 5520 shipped with VPN Plus license.Also does it require a seperate license for Anyconnect for Mobile and AnyConnect Essentials.
View 1 Replies View RelatedAny vendors that offer a firewall that doesn't require a shared layer-two domain for clustering?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm looking to make a possible configuration for a customer. They need a device to provide :- firewalling- bandwidth limiting based on protocols, IP, users- web content filtering- good reporting to see which device/users are consuming most of the bandwidth.I used to use cisco ASA as firewall but it's a while I last installed on and I'm nt uptodate which current state.So I thought of using an ASA 5512-X but I'd like to know if it comply with all the requirements .Most important being the reporting and bandwidth limiting capability. It would be great to have some configuration example regarding bandwidth management.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a windows 2003 server and an ASA 5512
I'm trying to use SSLVPN and it was all working, and I don't believe any configs on either box have been changed.
On Friday people were connecting, but now I get a message "Login Error" in the browser. In the ASDM home 'latest ADSM Syslog Messsages' I get "AAA authentication server not accessible", followed by two messsages AAA Marking LDAP server in group as FAILED AAA Marking LDAP server in group as ACTIVE
When I go to configuration --> Remote Access VPN --> AAA/Local Users AAA server groups and click on my RADIUS server and click Test, it takes a while and says ERROR: AD agent Server not responding: No error
If I stop my IAS server on my Windows box i get the same error but much more quickly.
I have a sonciwall set up doing the same thing, and RADIUS seems to work happily, so I don't think it's the server config...
My collegue and I have been trying to figure out why we are unable to get this ASA to NAT Overload correctly. I'm sure it is something stupid, and the config may have gotten a little dirty as we tried to change options and make it work. FYI, we can ssh from the WAN into the device to configure it. It is communicating externally, but it isn't natting.
ASA Version 8.6(1)2
!
hostname ASA5512-X-Remote
enable password ********** encrypted
passwd ********** encrypted
names(code)
I have a customer who needs a 5512-X set up with two ports on the "Outside" interface and act like a switch on the outside. This is very easy to do with the way the ASA 5505 works just by creating vlans and treating the ports as members of the vlan.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am having soem difficulty getting documentation and setup procedures for the new ASA 5512-X (or X models in general) firewalls.I know the IPS sensor is a software-based one, but I'm not sure how much different the setup in than with a 5510 and IPS module.
Also, is the IOS upgrade procedure different?
I'm trying to access our ASA 5512-X via the Management port, but the address https://192.168.1.1/admin can't be displayed.
View 35 Replies View RelatedI am configuring a brand new pair of ASA 5512s running 8.6(1). Traditionally we hae been using the Management port as the dedicated failover link, but that seems to not be possible on the 5512s.
ASA (config-if)# no management-only ERROR: It is not allowed to make changes to this option for management interface on this platform.
I have not been able to find anything in the official documentation mentioning this restriction.
I installed a new ASA 5512-X over the weekend for a client. Their backup ISP connection is DHCP based. I need to use the 'dhcp client route track' command on the interface, but it is not available. However according the all the documentation I am looking at and even the ASDM says it should be available.
This is the version of ASA and ASDM they are running:
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.6(1)1
Device Manager Version 6.6(1)
I did upgrade to the latest ASA software, so has this command been removed? If I do a '?' in the interface, there isn't a 'dchp' option.
I'm porting our configuration from a Pix 515 firewall to an ASA 5512x. What's vexing me right now is with the deprecation of the "static" command, I can't quite figure out the best way to Identity NAT my inside sub nets (multiple) to the DMZ sub net
So on the pix I have my identiy NATs as an example:
static (inside,dmz) <IntSubA> <IntSubA> netmask 255.255.255.0
static (inside,dmz) <IntSubB> <IntSubB> netmask 255.255.255.0
static (inside,dmz) <IntSubC> <IntSubC> netmask 255.255.255.0
Cisco's migration guide seems to do them one object at a time, which I guess is straightforward enough to do:
object network SubA
subnet <IntSubA> 255.255.255.0
[code]...
I'm thinking that there must be an easier way (aka less lines) to implement this for all the sub nets I want to Identity NAT to the DMZ.
1) Can I do this creating objects using a sub net with a net mask of 255.255.0.0 - one object to cover multiple internal sub nets?
2) Can I do this using object groups and trim this down to: (assuming I have to commands right)
Object-group network Inside_Subs
network-object <IntSubA> 255.255.255.0
network-object <intSubB> 255.255.255.0
network-object <intsubC> 255.255.255.0
nat (inside,dmz) source static Inside_Subs Inside_Subs no-proxy-ARP route-enabled. What would be the best way to translate my Identity NATs?
I have a Cisco 5512 x Firewall connected with Cisco Layer 3 switch 3750.I have two different WAN connections, one for Data and one for voice. Cisco Layer 3 switch is configured with 2 different VLAN's one for data & other is Voice Vlan. Switch is providing DHCP to computers and IP phones. Voice Pool 192.168.10.0/24 Vlan10 and Data pool 192.168.20.0/24 Vlan20.I need to route my data & voice traffic separately. Cisco ASA is connected with two different ISP's. So, how can I do this configuration so that Voice and Data traffic will route separately.
View 7 Replies View RelatedWhat is the benefit of replacing 5512 for 5510.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am currently trying to enable WCCP between a Cisco ASA 5512 firewall and Barraccuda Webfilter 410 Vx applicance. The ASA firewall is running IOS version 8.6(1)2 and the Barracuda is funning firemware 6.0.0.013. Both the ASA and Barracuda are in the same network and can ping eachother. The ASA has several interfaces, outside, inside, data and dmz. The PCs and barracuda appliance are behind the data interface. ASA data IP 172.16.18.1 Barracuda IP 172.16.18.40 All PCs in the 172.16.18.0/24 subnet use the ASA as the default gateway and should have web requests redirected to the Barracuda.
Below are the respecive bits of my ASA config
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description Management
speed 1000
[Code].....
I suspect my issue is that the ASA is generating a Router Identifier of 172.21.20.1 which is my inside network and the barracuda cannot communicate with it. how I can get this working ?
From what I can find the ASA does not support policy routing.
I have two VLANS that need to go to the same destination but different routes. Anyway to accomplish this on the ASA?
Configuration of inter-vlan routing on ASA 5512 ver 8.6? I have everything configured (un-nat, access-list, etc.) but still not working. When i do a packet capture, it says the traffic is denied by the implicit acl. Here is my config:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.100
vlan 100
nameif data
security-level 100
[Code]...
where I can find detailed documentation on these two products. Particularly, I am looking for high availability capabilities and any license requirements.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a problem with random host's geting the wrong source address on a ASA 5512-X 8.6(1). Right now there is a host, 192.168.25.108, showing up with 6.6.6.6 (fake) on whatsmyip.org, should be 5.5.5.5 like the rest of 192.168.25.0/24. In the xlate tabel I cant find anything wrong. Same yesterday with two host, that are using the right NAT address today.
nat (any,outside) dynamic interface. (5.5.5.5)
object network H-192.168.25.10
nat (inside,outside) static H-6.6.6.6X(code)
Just doing some basic testing before we replace our ancient PIX 515E with a new 5512. I have a mini lab set up following the diagram below, although I am unable to telnet through to the mail server's netcat listener on port 25 TCP. I can ping all the way outbound from 192.168.101.1 to 10.0.0.2, and the 10.0.0.2 machine shows it is translated properly to 200.225.117.1.
NAT and access rules are as follows:
object network mail
host 192.168.101.1
description Mail relay
access-list inbound extended permit ip any host 200.225.117.1
[code]....
EDIT: Somehow the new global access rule is involved. When adding a permit any any in there I can get to the mail server no problem. When I remove it but leave in my permit ip any any on the outside interface, I am denied?
if on the ASA 5512-X virtual contexts are supported with version 9.1 ?
I found different information on the Cisco web, the ASA datasheet says it is supported but in the configuration guide I found exactly the opposite information.
Cisco ASA Series General Operations CLI Configuration Guide 9.1 and 8.6 [URL]
Cisco ASA 5500 and ASA 5500-X Series Next- Generation Firewalls for Small Offices and Branch Locations Data Sheet (Updated) [URL]
Is the 5512 able to be field upgraded to a 5515 and so on through 5555? I.E. Can I add ram and other hardware to make the boxes more powerful as my requirements increase? I was hoping this would have been a new feature with the ngen firewalls.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI've been asked to deploy an ASA in Transparent Mode because of concerns of putting another layer 3 hop between PE and CE routers running BGP.
Is there some problem with allowing BGP to flow freely through an ASA the is also terminating site to site and remote access vpn tunnels?
I just don't see the need for Transparent Mode here and you cannot have a standard DMZ setup with Transparent Mode: you have to use bridge groups to provide for multiple interfaces on the ASA and then have an external router route between those bridge groups.
what I'm missing here as to why Transparent Mode is needed (not needed)
ASA is 5512
Does ASA 5512-X have a category-based webfilter build-in?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have created a VPN connection for ASA 5512-X by using the wizards and nothing seems to be wrong on the wizards's config.I am able to connect to the network by using the VPN but unable to ping internal network.Below is my config for your reference:
Result of the command: "sh run"
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.6(1)2
!
hostname FAA-ASA-1
enable password crzcsirI44h2BHoz encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
[code].....
how can I enable an automatic power-on after a power failure on an ASA 5512-X?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am quite new to firewall, in my company one asa 5510 firewall is there.I configured inside, outside, dns, dhcp and nating.I need to config bandwidth limit (1Mbps) for inside port and I restruct like facebook, youtube and pornsites..And I heard that some subscription is required, really is it required?
View 1 Replies View Related1. I currently have a Comcast Business Class Gateway, Cisco 2100 Series WLAN Controller and a Cisco ASA 5505 all connected together to supply LAN and WLAN internet connections on my network.
2. I also have a Card Access Security System on it owns network. It currently does not have internet access.
I would like to put my security system on the internet so that I can support it remotely. To do this, it has to be on a firewalled internet connection.Can I put the two networks on my ASA 5505 and keep them seperate? I don't want to provide a path into the Security System through my current LAN & WLAN. But I do need a frewalled internet connection on my Security System. I am trying to avoid purchasing a seperate firewall.
I have some technical consultations that I would like to know which would be a better implementation.
I am seeking for clarifications whether putting VPN and firewall in a single software or separating both into separate software.