I am working on pix 525, when connected through console I can access the whole internet but when i connect the pc to the inside interface i have no access to the internet. the pc can ping the pix inside interface and from pix i can ping the pc. My configuration is shown below.
PIX Version 7.2(2)
!
hostname pix
domain-name xyz.edu.pk
enable password xxxxxxxx encrypted
[code]....
I am new in ASA, I have the DMZ (10.1.1.0/24) configured on ASA 5520 and I achieve the reach Internet from DMZ (10.1.1.0/24), but now need reach DMZ from inside (172.16.12.0/24) and inside (172.16.12.0/24) from DMZ (10.1.1.0/24), in other words round trip.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to make a very plain and simple network with the ASA 5505, I've strated from scratch over a dozen times triyng to find where I'm going wrong. My main goal is to simply create an IPSec VPN connection to my ASA 5505 and simply ping and connect to devices with the "inside network", so far I can easily create and establish a IPSec VPN Connection, but up to this point, I cannot successfully ping or access a single device on the ASA 5505 inside network.I've taken, create the IPSec profile with the ASDM wizard, add exemption for the VPN IP Pool, add access-list from this Cisco link, url...All this and I can't make a single connection to the inside network. [code]
View 7 Replies View Relatedadministrator wants to manage ASA 5500 using inside interface.{telnet or ssh].Allowed telnet and ssh in ASA 5500 but unable to get access from administrator PC..Is there a way to do it without enabling NAT on the ASA? Will a specific rule on ASA allow adminstrator to access ASA 5500 inside interface via ssh or telnet?
View 2 Replies View Related I have a customer with an 877ISR with zone base firewall. They want to access two servers on the inside from the internet using RDP but with different ports.
Partial configuration.
interface Dialer0
description $FW_OUTSIDE$
ip address negotiated
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables(code)
I am having a problem configuring my ASA 5505 for NAT.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm using a Cisco 1941 router with two WAN interfaces. One is directry connected to our ISP and one is connected to another router wich is then connected to another ISP. Hosts on the LAN cannot access the Internet at all but the router has Internet access, im guessing its something simple but i cant seem to spot the error, i have removed the ZBF configuration from the interfaces. [code]
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am trying to access and ping the inside interface of a ASA5505 from a remote network. From the remote network, I am able to access anything on the local network, but the ASA5505 inside interface.The 2 networks linked by a fiber link which have a transport network on another interface. From the remote network, I am able to ping the transport network interface IP, but I would like to be able to ping the inside interface IP. When I do a packet tracer, I get a deny from an implicit rule.How can I achieve that?
Here are the subnets involved and the ASA5505 config.
Remote network : 10.10.2.0/24
Local network : 10.10.1.0/24
Transport network : 10.10.99.0/24
[code]....
We have ASA 5550, I have a portal server in the dmz which is natted statically to a public ip address for port 443. The application works fine from outside world. The server is also nated with a dynamic nat from inside to dmz and when I hit on the dmz ip from my inside it works fine.
The requirement for us is that the users sitting behind the inside (i.e. LAN) should access the server on the public ip address and not thru the dmz.
A Cisco ASA running 8.2.5 with 3 interfaces: Outside (Sec lvl 0)/-nternet IP / DMZ (Sec lvl 2)-192.168.8.0/24 / Inside (Sec level 100)-192.168.1.0/24
An ACL on the DMZ which looks like this:
access list DMZ_IN permit ip 192.168.8.0 255.255.255.0 any
access list DMZ_IN deny ip any any
access-group DMZ_IN in interface DMZ
global (outside) 1 interface
nat (DMZ) 1 192.168.8.0 255.255.255.0
Nat Control is not enabled (by default) There is no nat exemption, static identity nat or any nat of any kind set up between the Inside and DMZ.The question is: Will the DMZ network be able to initiate connections to the Inside network or will only outside (internet) access be permitted?
A) No, inside access will not be permitted, only Interenet access will be permitted, because there is no NAT exemption or Static Identity NAT between the lower level security interface (DMZ) and the Higher level security interface (Inside), regardless of the DMZ ACL rule with a destination of ANY.
B) Yes, access to the Internet and the Inside can be initiated because NAT control is disabled and there is an ACL that permits DMZ traffic to 'ANY' destination.
I recently upgraded my asa from 8.2 to 9.1 (reconfigured from scratch - didnot convert old config) and everything seems to be working fine except for communication between my INTERNAL network and my DMZ. Here's my config below -
ASA Version 9.1(1)
!
hostname ZEPPELIN
domain-name MIWEBPORTAL.com
enable password XXXXX
[Code]...
I have a cisco asa 5520 ios 8.2. This is my configuration [code] But i can not access from DMZ to INSIDE.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a mail archiver (hardware device) in my network that I need to access to from the Ipad/iphone. There is an app for it but I have to allow the access on the ASA. I created an 'object' for the device and added a Static NAT entry for it, then added an access rule. Its not working so I am guessing I did it wrong. The device uses port 8000 which I also added to the object. correct commands, or using the ASDM works too.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to connect from an inside host to a host located in the DMZ zone for DNS queries. The host in the DMZ zone has a static NAT to the outside. The point now is that I would like to connect from inside to the NATed outside address, means to the public Internet address.
Inside host: 10.0.0.1 -> PAT for 10.0.0.0/8 to 20.0.0.254 (Outside Interface)
DMZ host: 192.168.1.1 -> NAT to outside to 20.0.0.1
The traffic should be 10.0.0.1 udp>1024 to 20.0.0.1 udp=53. The source IP address on the outside interface now is 20.0.0.254 (according to the PAT), the destination IP address 20.0.0.1. The DNS reply from 20.0.0.1 should go back now to 20.0.0.254 and then to the inside host 10.0.0.1.
I know that on the PIX it was not possible, to have outgoing traffic on the outside interface which immediately enters again the same interface. Can I realize this scenario with the ASA 8.4(3) release now?
What I have is 3 interfaces on my PIX.- Outside: 216.116.87.0/24 (security level 0)
- 469: 172.16.6.0 /24 (security level 10)
- 571: 192.168.255.0 /24 (security level 1)
My users on 571 need to access a web server on the 469 interface. However, the requirements are that the 571 users can only access the Website using the public FQDN which there is a static NAT from outside to 469. [code] Here is also the Packet-Tracer and it shows what I expect that the traffic is source from 571 and exits 469. However, the users are not able to access the website.[code]
We have an ASA5505 UL bundel, updated with this license "L-ASA5505-SEC-PL=" to enable traffic from DMZ to Inside. No NAT or rules deployed for that yet.
On the Inside we have Exchange 2007 in a single server installation. The public url for smtp, ActiveSync, OWA and Outlook Anywhere is mail.company.se. There is a static NAT for outside traffic to access above mentioned services on inside. Now, on DMZ there is the WLAN for guests to access the Internet. How ever, our Smart Phones with WLAN turned on, cannot sync to the Exchange Server on the Inside! The DMZ gets IP-addressen from ASA on DMZ Interface with external DNS configured. How can I configure the ASA to achieve the function of ActiveSync from DMZ to Inside with the public URL from the phones?
I did this on the PIX and it worked like a charm, but I am having some difficulty translating the configuration to an ASA.
In the PIX I performed NAT on outside traffic to a specific inside host (web server) to map to the inside interface so that return traffic would go to the same firewall the traffic came in through, The reason for this configuration was because the gateway of last resort was a different firewall and not the firewall the traffic came in through.
Now to further give you some history, the gateway of last resort is an ASA running 9.1 (Now), prior to that it was a PIX with v8.0(4), traffic to the aforementioned web server came in through the gateway of last resort), which at the time was the PIX.
However, for some reason after swapping the PIX for an ASA (same rules, updated NAT rules for 9.1) access to the same web server is slow. Not sure why, but it’s the case. To alleviate the slowness we experienced, and until I can figure out why this occurs on the ASA, I placed a PIX on the network that only listens for traffic for the web server in question. On this PIX I map to the inside interface so that traffic flow works and external clients can access the web server with no issues.
So two questions, one I would like to use the configuration I have for the web server on the PIX on the ASA to see if that setup on the ASA works better, but having difficulty translating the rules to the ASA.
Second question, (Slow access with ASA to a web server, but fast with PIX to the same web server)?
P.S. Addresses in attached picture config are not real, but I know what they translate to.
we have a server that has an outside IP and an inside IP. It's inside ip is 192.168.222.30/24 and it's outside IP is 199.204.50.2/29. The connection to this server from the outside is perfectly fine, but access from inside users to the NAT'd IP which is 199.204.50.2/29 is having issues, however, access to the inside IP works fine (this part makes sense)Will It be a must to set the inside DNS A record to the inside IP and not the outside IP, or can users on the inside interface access the NAT'd IP which is assigned to the server
LAN(192.168.222.0/24)<=====>InsideASAOutside<=====>(Server with NAT IP 192.168.222.30/24, it's also physicall assigned to this server).This is an ASA 5510 with 8.4.
Using an ASA5505, have 1 static outside address, want to access an inside SBS-Server on SMTP, RDP (3389), HTTPS and port 987
Have configured network object nat rules using the asdm, SMTP works (I can telnet to the server on port 25 from outside), however for some reason I can not telnet inside and out on port 25, so outgoing mail does not work. RDP does not seem to work from outside, 987 I havent tested from outside. When I try to create a network object nat rule for https I get this message from the ASA:
[OK] object network SBS-HTTPS
object network SBS-HTTPS
[ERROR] nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp https https
NAT unable to reserve ports.
I am using ASA 5505 firewall with base-license. I connected my firewall to one cisco 3750 switch where i created 5 vlans. I done NATing for all vlans and they able to get internet and working fine. They able to browse all internet sites like gmail and yahoo mail.
All internal users are configured to use Outlook for their webmail. Here the problem is with outlook they are unable to send and receive the mails.
If they directly connected their system using public ip( Directly from ISP) they able to send and receive mails from outlook.
I have been asked to set up remote access VPN on an ASA 5505 that I previously had no invlovement with. I have set it up the VPN using the wizard, they way I normally do, but the clients have no access to anything in the inside subnet, not even the inside interface IP address of the ASA. Thay can ping each other. The remote access policy below that I am working on is labeled VPNPHONE, address pool 172.16.20.1-10. I do not need split tunneling to be enabled. The active WAN interface is the one labeled outside_cable. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have recently deployed a Cisco ASA 5510 Security plus firewall on my companies network, but there is a problem that I am finding hard to get by and I think it is ASA related.
From (inside we are not able to hit any of our sites that are on the (outside). I have nat policies in place to translate the public to private, but I think I that I need some thing more. This seems to be occuring mainly with our external web sites as well as another animoly with regards to FTP (but it may be fixed if the http issue is resolved.)
I was hoping some with a lot more knowledge on ASA firewalls than my self can spot the error in my run-cfgs.
[code]....
So I've run into a problem on my ASA5510, post-upgrade I can no longer connect to the inside interface from across our L2L VPN. I've tried both ASDM and SSH and the connections fail. I see in the logs that the attempt is being made, but it will eventually time out. There have been no problems with this type of connection with any previous upgrades, just this particular upgrade, I went from 8.4(1) to 8.4(2). I don't see much in the release notes or anything in a pre/post config diff that jumps out as a cause to this behavior. The only thing I did see in the release notes "CSCtg50770 Mngt-access (ASDM,SSH) to inside intf of 5580 fails over RA VPN session" which sounds like it could be my problem, but that was in the "Fixed in 8.4(2)" section and says it's for a 5580, maybe the fix for the 5580 broke it on a 5510??? I hope not and that I'm simply missing some new setting that I need to enable for this type of connection as this device is in a remote office.
View 2 Replies View RelatedConfiguring an asa 5505 with 8.42 software.I need to access an https server on the inside via the outside interface. have moved the http server enable to port 10443.Tried to make a "network object nat rule"
object network Vejrstation nat (any,outside) static interface service tcp https https object network Vejrstationnat (any,outside) static interface service tcp https https.
I have setup a few Vpn clients but no ones able to access the inside network.The clients all get a Ip address from the pool and DNS servers Ip's. But cannot ping or connect to there pc's. I'm thining its somewhere in the ACL.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have an ASA 5510 which works great except I'm unable to connect to the remote access VPN from inside the network (behind the ASA). Is there a special NAT exemption required? [code]
View 6 Replies View RelatedI'm having trouble setting up the correct rules on an ASA 5505 I'm using in my home office. I have a couple of IP Cams I need to access remotely.
I've tried setting up simple NAT(PAT) and/or Access Rules, but it hasn't worked. I have a single dynamic IP for the Outside interface. Call it 77.76.88.10 and I am using PAT. The CAM is setup to connect on port 80, but could be configured if necessary. I've tried setting up NAT Rules using ASDM as follows:
Match Criteria: Original Packet
Source Intf = outside
Dest Intf = inside
[Code]....
I'm afraid to use CLI only because I am not confident I'll know how to remove changes if I make a mistake.
I cannot get this to work properly and I've even had a Cisco engineer from TAC set-this up... and it literally broke my inside network. I have a VPN range of addresses..x.x.x.x on the Outside that needs access to a server on the Inside at y.y.y.y. HTTPS/443 connectivity. I need to NAT my VPN subnet/pool in order to talk to the inside host, as that host will not accept traffic from my VPN subnet, but obviously, will accept traffic from Inside my private network.
The Cisco tech entered the following static NAT statement to "fix" the problem - nat (outside,inside) source static VPN Inside-Network destination static Host-y.y.y.y Host-y.y.y.y For whatever reason, whenever this is configured on my ASA 5550 v8.3(2)25 the Inside interface starts proxy arping and assigns all IP addresses on my private network with the MAC address of the Inside interface.
The y.y.y.y is on a remote, routed network within my private, corporate MPLS network. My Inside private network (Inside-network shown in the static NAT above) is x.x.x.x. Not sure why this happens, but it kills my entire network and I have to jump through hoops to quiesce the network and get everything back to normal.I've tried to Dynamic-PAT/hide the VPN range behind the Inside interface through ASDM and that seems to do nothing.The NAT statement above will break my network. How to NAT this connection without killing my Inside network? Or, on how to properly hide my VPN subnet/pool behind my Inside interface and back to the VPN subnet/pool.
My internal network consists of Catalyst 3750 switches segmented into different VLANs. There is a default route on the layer 3 Catalyst switch sending all unknown traffice to the inside Internet of the ASA 5510. However, I'd like to have a separate VLAN for wifi guest access and send all of that traffic through one of the DMZ interfaces on the ASA 5510. I don't think you can have separate default routes based on VLANs on the 3750 switches so my only option is to make the ip address of the DMZ port the default gateway for all hosts on the wifi guest VLAN.
The problem I have is that I have a couple servers behind the inside interface that have services available to the public Internet via a NAT address on the outside interface. I want the guests on the wifi VLAN to have the ability to access the servers on the inside interface using the public address as well, but have not been able to come up with a solution yet.
Here is my config that pertains to this setup:
interface Ethernet0/0description Outside Interfacenameif Outsidesecurity-level 0ip address 76.47.10.x 255.255.255.224 rip send version 1rip receive version 1!interface Ethernet0/1description Inside Interfacenameif Insidesecurity-level 100ip address 192.168.17.1 255.255.255.0 rip send version 1rip receive version 1!interface Ethernet0/3description Wifi Guest Accessnameif DMZ2security-level 50ip address 192.168.60.1 255.255.255.0
global (Outside) 1 interface
nat (Inside) 0 access-list nonat
nat (Inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
nat (DMZ2) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
static (Inside,Outside) 76.47.10.x 192.168.17.88 netmask 255.255.255.255
I've tried the following commands below but no dice.
same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
static (inside, inside) 76.47.10.x 192.168.17.88 netmask 255.255.255.255
I'm just new with ASA. I'm just self-studying on it. I was tasked to have an ACL that will allow inside hosts to access a specific network. Is there a way on how to know all the inside hosts on the behind ASA so that I can do a "object-group network" on those inside hosts which I think it will look neat.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an issue accessing the inside network of my church from VPN. This only happens when I connect from my home network. I have no problem accessing inside network of my church if I'm connected from else where (my Clear Hotspot or someone else's house). Here is the hardware detail:
At the church, we are using Cisco ASA 5510 and we have so many VPN tunnels to different churches. At home, I 'm using Cisco ASA 5505. See that attached configuration for my home ASA5505.
I am trying to configure a server(192.168.5.50) in DMZ(192.168.5.0/24) to be able to communicate with a domain controller(10.5.44.220) in the inside network(10.5.44.0/24). I made some configuration using ASDM(not familiar with the CLI) but not working and it caused existing NAT not to work, for example RDP(TCP 3389) connection to 38.96.179.220
The things I am trying to achieve are
1. two way commucation between 192.168.5.50 in DMZ and 10.5.44.220 in Inside for SecureAuthPorts and SecureAuthOutbound service groups
2. NAT for 192.168.5.50 mapping 38.96.179.50 for the service groups mentioned above
3. NAT for other hosts already existing
I am setting up a new ASA 5510 on our inside network so that we can terminate our VPN connections on this ASA. I can get the VPN to work fine however I noticed that once I turned on my VPN profiles now when I try to access the ASDM I'm getting the VPN logon page. So I decided that in order to resolve this I need a separate interface dedicated to management of my ASA.
I'm trying to come up with the best way to do this. I've got two ports on the ASA plugged into my core switch. One is on a separate VLAN from the rest of my network traffic. This is the port I want to use for management. The second will be used to route all of my VPN traffic.
So far I haven't been able to get this to work at all. My thought was that it had to do with routes, NAT and ACLs. I've been playing with them but can't get any combination to work.