My users on 571 need to access a web server on the 469 interface. However, the requirements are that the 571 users can only access the Website using the public FQDN which there is a static NAT from outside to 469. [code] Here is also the Packet-Tracer and it shows what I expect that the traffic is source from 571 and exits 469. However, the users are not able to access the website.[code]
I may have phrased the topic not too clearly, but I have an external domain name of mail.company.com , I want my users INSIDE the company be able to also get to url..., currently they cannot (nothing loads, looks to me as if firewall simply drops it) and I'm drawing a blank on how to get this done. Externally this works fine so if you're outside the company you can load up OWA just fine since my NAT rule translates the external IP to internal IP, but something is blocking this from the inside.
I have an ASA 5510. If you can just sent me on the right path with theory I'll figure it out on my own, I don't need exact steps, but I must be thinking of this wrong as I'm not getting anywhere.
Using an ASA5505, have 1 static outside address, want to access an inside SBS-Server on SMTP, RDP (3389), HTTPS and port 987
Have configured network object nat rules using the asdm, SMTP works (I can telnet to the server on port 25 from outside), however for some reason I can not telnet inside and out on port 25, so outgoing mail does not work. RDP does not seem to work from outside, 987 I havent tested from outside. When I try to create a network object nat rule for https I get this message from the ASA:
Configuring an asa 5505 with 8.42 software.I need to access an https server on the inside via the outside interface. have moved the http server enable to port 10443.Tried to make a "network object nat rule"
I'm having trouble setting up the correct rules on an ASA 5505 I'm using in my home office. I have a couple of IP Cams I need to access remotely.
I've tried setting up simple NAT(PAT) and/or Access Rules, but it hasn't worked. I have a single dynamic IP for the Outside interface. Call it 77.76.88.10 and I am using PAT. The CAM is setup to connect on port 80, but could be configured if necessary. I've tried setting up NAT Rules using ASDM as follows:
Match Criteria: Original Packet Source Intf = outside Dest Intf = inside
[Code]....
I'm afraid to use CLI only because I am not confident I'll know how to remove changes if I make a mistake.
My internal network consists of Catalyst 3750 switches segmented into different VLANs. There is a default route on the layer 3 Catalyst switch sending all unknown traffice to the inside Internet of the ASA 5510. However, I'd like to have a separate VLAN for wifi guest access and send all of that traffic through one of the DMZ interfaces on the ASA 5510. I don't think you can have separate default routes based on VLANs on the 3750 switches so my only option is to make the ip address of the DMZ port the default gateway for all hosts on the wifi guest VLAN.
The problem I have is that I have a couple servers behind the inside interface that have services available to the public Internet via a NAT address on the outside interface. I want the guests on the wifi VLAN to have the ability to access the servers on the inside interface using the public address as well, but have not been able to come up with a solution yet.
Here is my config that pertains to this setup:
interface Ethernet0/0description Outside Interfacenameif Outsidesecurity-level 0ip address 76.47.10.x 255.255.255.224 rip send version 1rip receive version 1!interface Ethernet0/1description Inside Interfacenameif Insidesecurity-level 100ip address 192.168.17.1 255.255.255.0 rip send version 1rip receive version 1!interface Ethernet0/3description Wifi Guest Accessnameif DMZ2security-level 50ip address 192.168.60.1 255.255.255.0
I'm trying to add an access-list rule to allow internal servers to connect an outside host on a asa 5540. The hostname translates to multiple ip's. Normally I just lookup the ip address or one of the ip's the hostname translates too and use that in the access-list as the host. For some reason the actual ip's, which are a few, are not always available so using a specific ip sometimes does not work, thus the reason I have to use the hostname instead of the ip. I have 2 hostnames. www.hostname.com and subdomain.hostname.com.
This is how I normally add these rules (the ip addresses are fictive): access-list internet_access extended permit tcp host 192.168.50.5 host 84.115.57.121 eq www log
When I try to add this using the hostname on our asa I get an error: access-list internet_access extended permit tcp host 192.168.50.5 host www.hostname.com ?ERROR: % Unrecognized command
I've tried it without the 'www', so hostname.com but same error.
I have a video hosting server on vmware and I need to be able to connect to it through it's domain name. It needs a FQDN. On it's network config it has spaces to enter in FQDN, IP, Subnet, and two DNS. It must use FQDN to connect through http.I was told I can just open up the system32/driver/etc/host file and edit in the info, ex: 1.1.1.2 [URL] I tried to ping 1.1.1.2 and it does ping, and I even tried to ping [URL] and it pings (not connected to the web). But I can't get the web interface to connect when i put in server.com:8080 (needs 8080) into my web browser. FYI, I have no idea about the DNS space on the server, I just put in some random number. Why does this server need a DNS anyways?This computer is not connected to the web or any other computer. It's just this computer and the vmware server on it.
The router is 2821 and is setup to perform static NAT from one internal ip address mapping to one external ip address for each of our servers (inside the LAN): [code] Servers all have internal ip addresses and each of them represented to the outside world by their public ip address with above command on the router. Here is the problem.When I'm in a server (for example 192.168.0.210) and try to access other servers by their public ip addresses (i..e. *.*.*.211) the connection fails. However, When i try to access the same server by it's private IP address (i.e. 192.168.0.211) it works!
My issue is i don't want to modify windows host file for a manual mapping (for example mail.mydomian.com goes to 192.168.0.211 rather than *.*.*.211) because we host many domains and just doesn't make sense to do it one by one.So we must be able to access our servers by their public IP addresses in order for us our applications works correctly.
I hava ASA5510. INSIDE,DMZ and OUTSIDE interfaces are configured. I hava web server on DMZ ip:10.0.0.1 and it is static natted to 1.1.1.1. From internet i can reach to web server with IP:1.1.1.1 and from INSIDE connect to web server with IP:10.0.0.1. Now i want to connect from INSIDE to WEB server via public IP(1.1.1.1).how can configure it?
I have installed ASA5505 in the network. Port forwarding has been done for one of the server in our LAN. Public users are able to access the server successfully. I am trying to access from inside using the same Public server IP, but unable to access it. Can I have this feature in ASA5505(I think it is loopback configuration). If so, may I know the configuration detail?
We've just started with the ASA 5505. We do run a DHCP server on the inside interface, so it is in the same VLAN 1 as all of the clients. However, we cannot get it to work.We can't use DHCP Relay, as the ASA 5505 only allows to relay to DHCP servers in a different subnet.Or do we have to move the DHCP server to a different subnet. If so, how would we configure that scenario?
We are using an ASA with 8.4 in transparent mode. Connection fails when a host on inside tries to connect to a server on outside. This server uses mac-address 0100.5E00.0000 to load balance but replies with real mac-address.Firewall logs "Deny TCP".ARP inspection is disabled.
I have a 5520 in production at a customer's site between an outside 802.11 network and an inside server. The server can get to outside hosts OK, and the traffic is being NATed properly, and sockets initiated by the server on the inside can pass data both ways, but I need to allow outside hosts the ability to send 'announcement' UDP packets to the inside server. I thought this might be an outside-NAT-required issue to get the traffic routed, but I need the inside server to see the actual outside host source IP in the UDP packet, so I basically set the outside host up similar to the inside host, just without the NAT table on the firewall -- it's subnet is outside the destination (inside server) subnet, and its gateway is the outside interface of the ASA, the same way the inside server is able to get to hosts outside. The firewall should just route the packet with a destination of the inside subnet once it sees that it hits a 'permit' ACL.
I have the appropriate ACL's set up, and when I do 'show access-list' I see policy hits for the 'permit' statements where the outside host is generating the announcement and it's hitting the ACL. I even duplicated the ACL into list 101 and 102, and applied 101 for inbound traffic on the outside int, and applied 102 for outbound traffic on the inside int, and I'm seeing policy hits on both permit statements outside and inside, so it looks like the traffic is being passed on to the inside interface and permitted, but the server isn't seeing the packets.
I can ping the outside interface from the outside, but cannot ping the inside interface or any inside hosts from the outside, even though I have 'permit icmp any any' enabled on the ACL on both ints. When I remove the firewall and put the outside clients on the same subnet, the server sees the packets just fine.
I set up the same scenario in my lab with an ASA 5505, with the same results. Below is the running config from the 5505 in the lab. The production firewall is running a slightly older version of ASA, so I made the configuration as basic as possible on the 5505 to match the config in the field:
We have dns server(only Internal IP) inside our network, right now we have configured Remote Access VPN using Public IP and we connect it using the same Public IP. I need to use FQDN instead using Public IP.
We have dns server(only Internal IP) inside our network, right now we have configured Remote Access VPN using Public IP and we connect it using the same Public IP. I need to use FQDN instead using Public IP. What is the configuration for this.
A Cisco ASA running 8.2.5 with 3 interfaces: Outside (Sec lvl 0)/-nternet IP / DMZ (Sec lvl 2)-192.168.8.0/24 / Inside (Sec level 100)-192.168.1.0/24
An ACL on the DMZ which looks like this:
access list DMZ_IN permit ip 192.168.8.0 255.255.255.0 any access list DMZ_IN deny ip any any access-group DMZ_IN in interface DMZ global (outside) 1 interface nat (DMZ) 1 192.168.8.0 255.255.255.0
Nat Control is not enabled (by default) There is no nat exemption, static identity nat or any nat of any kind set up between the Inside and DMZ.The question is: Will the DMZ network be able to initiate connections to the Inside network or will only outside (internet) access be permitted?
A) No, inside access will not be permitted, only Interenet access will be permitted, because there is no NAT exemption or Static Identity NAT between the lower level security interface (DMZ) and the Higher level security interface (Inside), regardless of the DMZ ACL rule with a destination of ANY.
B) Yes, access to the Internet and the Inside can be initiated because NAT control is disabled and there is an ACL that permits DMZ traffic to 'ANY' destination.
I recently upgraded my asa from 8.2 to 9.1 (reconfigured from scratch - didnot convert old config) and everything seems to be working fine except for communication between my INTERNAL network and my DMZ. Here's my config below -
I have a mail archiver (hardware device) in my network that I need to access to from the Ipad/iphone. There is an app for it but I have to allow the access on the ASA. I created an 'object' for the device and added a Static NAT entry for it, then added an access rule. Its not working so I am guessing I did it wrong. The device uses port 8000 which I also added to the object. correct commands, or using the ASDM works too.
I am working on pix 525, when connected through console I can access the whole internet but when i connect the pc to the inside interface i have no access to the internet. the pc can ping the pix inside interface and from pix i can ping the pc. My configuration is shown below.
I need to connect from an inside host to a host located in the DMZ zone for DNS queries. The host in the DMZ zone has a static NAT to the outside. The point now is that I would like to connect from inside to the NATed outside address, means to the public Internet address.
Inside host: 10.0.0.1 -> PAT for 10.0.0.0/8 to 20.0.0.254 (Outside Interface) DMZ host: 192.168.1.1 -> NAT to outside to 20.0.0.1
The traffic should be 10.0.0.1 udp>1024 to 20.0.0.1 udp=53. The source IP address on the outside interface now is 20.0.0.254 (according to the PAT), the destination IP address 20.0.0.1. The DNS reply from 20.0.0.1 should go back now to 20.0.0.254 and then to the inside host 10.0.0.1.
I know that on the PIX it was not possible, to have outgoing traffic on the outside interface which immediately enters again the same interface. Can I realize this scenario with the ASA 8.4(3) release now?
We have an ASA5505 UL bundel, updated with this license "L-ASA5505-SEC-PL=" to enable traffic from DMZ to Inside. No NAT or rules deployed for that yet.
On the Inside we have Exchange 2007 in a single server installation. The public url for smtp, ActiveSync, OWA and Outlook Anywhere is mail.company.se. There is a static NAT for outside traffic to access above mentioned services on inside. Now, on DMZ there is the WLAN for guests to access the Internet. How ever, our Smart Phones with WLAN turned on, cannot sync to the Exchange Server on the Inside! The DMZ gets IP-addressen from ASA on DMZ Interface with external DNS configured. How can I configure the ASA to achieve the function of ActiveSync from DMZ to Inside with the public URL from the phones?
I am new in ASA, I have the DMZ (10.1.1.0/24) configured on ASA 5520 and I achieve the reach Internet from DMZ (10.1.1.0/24), but now need reach DMZ from inside (172.16.12.0/24) and inside (172.16.12.0/24) from DMZ (10.1.1.0/24), in other words round trip.
I did this on the PIX and it worked like a charm, but I am having some difficulty translating the configuration to an ASA.
In the PIX I performed NAT on outside traffic to a specific inside host (web server) to map to the inside interface so that return traffic would go to the same firewall the traffic came in through, The reason for this configuration was because the gateway of last resort was a different firewall and not the firewall the traffic came in through.
Now to further give you some history, the gateway of last resort is an ASA running 9.1 (Now), prior to that it was a PIX with v8.0(4), traffic to the aforementioned web server came in through the gateway of last resort), which at the time was the PIX.
However, for some reason after swapping the PIX for an ASA (same rules, updated NAT rules for 9.1) access to the same web server is slow. Not sure why, but it’s the case. To alleviate the slowness we experienced, and until I can figure out why this occurs on the ASA, I placed a PIX on the network that only listens for traffic for the web server in question. On this PIX I map to the inside interface so that traffic flow works and external clients can access the web server with no issues.
So two questions, one I would like to use the configuration I have for the web server on the PIX on the ASA to see if that setup on the ASA works better, but having difficulty translating the rules to the ASA.
Second question, (Slow access with ASA to a web server, but fast with PIX to the same web server)?
P.S. Addresses in attached picture config are not real, but I know what they translate to.
we have a server that has an outside IP and an inside IP. It's inside ip is 192.168.222.30/24 and it's outside IP is 199.204.50.2/29. The connection to this server from the outside is perfectly fine, but access from inside users to the NAT'd IP which is 199.204.50.2/29 is having issues, however, access to the inside IP works fine (this part makes sense)Will It be a must to set the inside DNS A record to the inside IP and not the outside IP, or can users on the inside interface access the NAT'd IP which is assigned to the server
LAN(192.168.222.0/24)<=====>InsideASAOutside<=====>(Server with NAT IP 192.168.222.30/24, it's also physicall assigned to this server).This is an ASA 5510 with 8.4.
I'm trying to make a very plain and simple network with the ASA 5505, I've strated from scratch over a dozen times triyng to find where I'm going wrong. My main goal is to simply create an IPSec VPN connection to my ASA 5505 and simply ping and connect to devices with the "inside network", so far I can easily create and establish a IPSec VPN Connection, but up to this point, I cannot successfully ping or access a single device on the ASA 5505 inside network.I've taken, create the IPSec profile with the ASDM wizard, add exemption for the VPN IP Pool, add access-list from this Cisco link, url...All this and I can't make a single connection to the inside network. [code]
administrator wants to manage ASA 5500 using inside interface.{telnet or ssh].Allowed telnet and ssh in ASA 5500 but unable to get access from administrator PC..Is there a way to do it without enabling NAT on the ASA? Will a specific rule on ASA allow adminstrator to access ASA 5500 inside interface via ssh or telnet?
I am using ASA 5505 firewall with base-license. I connected my firewall to one cisco 3750 switch where i created 5 vlans. I done NATing for all vlans and they able to get internet and working fine. They able to browse all internet sites like gmail and yahoo mail.
All internal users are configured to use Outlook for their webmail. Here the problem is with outlook they are unable to send and receive the mails.
If they directly connected their system using public ip( Directly from ISP) they able to send and receive mails from outlook.
I have been asked to set up remote access VPN on an ASA 5505 that I previously had no invlovement with. I have set it up the VPN using the wizard, they way I normally do, but the clients have no access to anything in the inside subnet, not even the inside interface IP address of the ASA. Thay can ping each other. The remote access policy below that I am working on is labeled VPNPHONE, address pool 172.16.20.1-10. I do not need split tunneling to be enabled. The active WAN interface is the one labeled outside_cable. [code]
I have a customer with an 877ISR with zone base firewall. They want to access two servers on the inside from the internet using RDP but with different ports.
Partial configuration.
interface Dialer0 description $FW_OUTSIDE$ ip address negotiated no ip redirects no ip unreachables(code)
I have recently deployed a Cisco ASA 5510 Security plus firewall on my companies network, but there is a problem that I am finding hard to get by and I think it is ASA related.
From (inside we are not able to hit any of our sites that are on the (outside). I have nat policies in place to translate the public to private, but I think I that I need some thing more. This seems to be occuring mainly with our external web sites as well as another animoly with regards to FTP (but it may be fixed if the http issue is resolved.)
I was hoping some with a lot more knowledge on ASA firewalls than my self can spot the error in my run-cfgs.
So I've run into a problem on my ASA5510, post-upgrade I can no longer connect to the inside interface from across our L2L VPN. I've tried both ASDM and SSH and the connections fail. I see in the logs that the attempt is being made, but it will eventually time out. There have been no problems with this type of connection with any previous upgrades, just this particular upgrade, I went from 8.4(1) to 8.4(2). I don't see much in the release notes or anything in a pre/post config diff that jumps out as a cause to this behavior. The only thing I did see in the release notes "CSCtg50770 Mngt-access (ASDM,SSH) to inside intf of 5580 fails over RA VPN session" which sounds like it could be my problem, but that was in the "Fixed in 8.4(2)" section and says it's for a 5580, maybe the fix for the 5580 broke it on a 5510??? I hope not and that I'm simply missing some new setting that I need to enable for this type of connection as this device is in a remote office.
