Cisco Routers :: SRP520 IPsec With Complex Pre-shared Key
Jan 7, 2012
I had lots of trouble creating an IPsec VPN tunnel between a SRP527W (FW 1.01.24 (003) Sep 7 2011) and 2811 (Version 12.4(25e)) Router.The message on the 2811 was "IKE message from x.x.x.x failed its sanity check or is malformed". The reason was the password complexity (or length, which I did not try out). The password I used was "$SIMA$B3nlXySl-q+C&PnI" which is not in use any more . Now I use a password without special chars and it works fine.
I think this is a bug on the SRP527W, because it works fine with an old 836. How to report a bug to cisco? I'm Cisco SMB partner, but I'm not allowed to create a TAC service request.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 5, 2012
i have tried to see the difference between the routers series:
srp 520w series and srp 520-u series but with no success.
is it possible to know the differences between this two series?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2012
I wondered, how much power do the SRP520-U series actual draw? Compared to commonly used home-grade equipment I think the power consumption is above average?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2013
I have at the moment an ASA5510 pair in Multiple Context configured. Everything is ok, but we use til now only ACL features.Now I would be interested in configuring 2 contexts, with IPSec VPNs. One VPN per context. But I cannot find any information if it would be possible to use a shared interface for both contexts. My wish would only be to spare public IPs.If I have to configure 100 VPNs in 100 contexts, do I need 100 public IPs ?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2013
I tried any type of combination and just couldn't make it works. Only PPTP works well. Whether Apple iOS IPSec VPN is supported or not?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2013
I have configured Ipsec vpn tunnel beetween two routers (from site A to site B) over untrusted internet connection by cisco 3825 routers and i can successfully access both of this routers. But now i need to access internet on site B router sitting on site A router. So that if i run traceroute from A site machine then the gateway by which internet passing through shows the ip of site B.
The Architecture of our both site routers :
Site A 10.1.11.0-----Router A 172.18.12.1-----VPN tunnel----Router B 172.18.12.2-----Site B 10.4.11.0
/////Create IKE policy
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr aes
authentication pre-share
group 2
[Code] .....
View 10 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2012
My apartment complex limits each connection to 200KBps but each connection has the same IP so I thought there has to be an easy way to combine the connections. Is there a way to connect the wired network i'm connected to with the wireless one?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2011
I have a rather complex issue that involves a Cisco softswitch, a Cisco router configured for BGP routing, a L2 Cisco switch, and two RAD IPMUXs.I am including a flat diagram that illustrates the layer 2 connections. On the diagram, the number adjacent to the vertical connection bar is the vlans allowed on that connection, either switchport access or trunk.
I use BGP routing on the router to advertise various routes. The issue is that the routes for the RAD IPMUX216 and RAD24 are both being advertised correctly and can be seen from remote sites. For example, from any remote site, I can ping any address on vlan 60 such as the switch, router, and IMMUX216 IPs. However, I can only ping the vlan 61 IPs for the router and switch, but not the RAD24. Even from the Softswitch and Router, I cannot ping the vlan 61 ip of the RAD24, 172.22.248.6. I can ping the softswitch from the router and vice-versa.
Here is a flat diagram for the network with some snippets of code. I can provide more info if needed. I changed the routable IPs just to hide some of our actual info. If I ping 172.22.248.6 from the softswitch and then issue the "sh arp" command, I get:
Victoria-SW#sh arp
Protocol Address Age (min) Hardware Addr Type Interface
Internet 172.22.248.1 0 0016.4650.c411 ARPA Vlan61
Internet 172.22.255.6 - 0019.5678.7d43 ARPA Vlan80
Internet 172.22.248.6 0 Incomplete ARPA
Internet 172.22.240.14 - 0019.5678.7d42 ARPA Vlan60
Internet 172.22.240.13 0 0020.d239.01a0 ARPA Vlan60
Internet 172.22.248.5 - 0019.5678.7d44 ARPA Vlan61
Internet 172.22.240.1 69 0016.4650.c411 ARPA Vlan60
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 25, 2011
We are looking into setting up wireless internet access for the whole complex.
1) We would have around 200 users at max (accounting for people to have more than one device or computer connected. Such as Xbox360 and whatnot). What speeds should we consider from a ISP.?
2) Should we get more than one ISP feed?
3) How many wireless access points should we get? (Ruffly we are looking at 5-6)
4) Where should the WAP's be placed around the complex? Considering the apartments are brick outside and inside regular wood frame/drywall construction type. Also should they be inside or outdoor WAP's.
5)What hardware should be considered? (switches, WAP's, ect...)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 2, 2012
I own a Dell XPS M1330 laptop (Windows 7 Home Premium 32 bit, service pack 1) that is about three and a half years old. I realize this Dell model has been discontinued. Work with me here. I STRONGLY believe after 6+ hours of personal troubleshooting that the laptop model is NOT the problem. I have lived at the same apartment complex the entire time I have owned this laptop. Up until a month ago when a new management company (the third one I’ve had) took over, I was able to use the free WiFi they offer at the office and the laundry room without one single speck of a problem weekly for YEARS. Suddenly I am getting: Unidentified Network: No Internet Connection with a public park bench (which it is a public network, I suppose) and a “!” over my perfect five bar signal. Therefore, we can rule out signal strength as the problem. I have a Dell Wireless 1395 WLAN Mino-Card, the card that came pre-installed with the laptop when I bought it brand new. Also, I know the Dell Wireless Card WLAN Utility is installed on this computer but I’ve always used Windows Network and Sharing Center to control the WiFi network I am connected to. I saw something somewhere about this maybe being the problem but since I’ve never used it I don’t think it has anything to do with my problem…
Talk about the router will be brief as it is my apartment complex they will not allow me access to the router so I know virtually nothing other than it is a Cisco wireless router, there are three office computers connected to it that run the internet just fine, and DCHP is enabled on both my laptop and the router (I may or may not have snuck in against their wishes to figure this one out…).
Also noteworthy are two things. One: I can connect to about a dozen other public WiFi networks around the city malls, coffee shops, bookstores, the college campuses, ECT. So connecting to WiFi is not the problem, this WiFi network specifically is (AKA. My NIC is NOT dead). I can also connect to my boyfriend’s private network at his house. The second thing worth noting is that once, I got the manager to cave and re-set the router for me. It connected! I re-started my computer and it still connected! I took my laptop back to my apartment, brought it back re-booted an hour late and it still connected! The next morning; back to the same old annoying problem. I asked him if they did ANYTHING with the computers at night and he said no.
As I stated, I have 6+ hours of troubleshooting pre-done on this problem. I have tried what I am able to with no access to the router (okay, maybe I snuck in and did a couple more things…) including:
Re-start laptop.
Re-start router.
Disable all firewalls/virus protection programs/ect.
Connect to the internet in Safe Mode.
Disable Bonjour.
Uninstall wireless card/re-install wireless card/un-install drivers/re-install drivers/update drivers.
Reset the TCP/IP stack.
[code].....
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2012
Is that possible to increase the pre-shared key length from 30 characters to 32?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2012
I have a Cisco SRP527W at my remote office set up. I have configered a VPN connection to it. I installed Cisco VPN Client on my laptop.I can connect to the VPN but can not access the shared folders. I can ping the PC that has the shared folders. I take my PC and connect to the onsite LAN with WIFI, and I can now view the shared folders. I assume it must be somthing in the VPN set up that is blocking the shared folders from being seen. I also have disconnect all firewalls during testing at the remote end. I'am using windows 7 (64) on both PC's.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2011
Trying to hook up to my blu ray player for a internet connection, but the blu ray is telling me to check the pc for a shared users so it can connect!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2011
Cisco support write down manual (workaround), how to setup IPsec VPN connection on Mac OS 1.7?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 4, 2012
I am trying to build an IPSec between two 881 routers in my lab. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2013
Is it possible to have a site-to-site IPSEC tunnel between 2 identical RV110W routers?I basically want one of them to initiate a secure tunnel with the second so that computers from one router subnet see the computers from the other router subnet.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2013
the RV110W IPSEC site-to-site tunnel, are there necessary 2 x public IPs for it to work, or only 1 public IP is enough? [code]If it works with 1 public ip, the "CLIENT" RV110W configuration should be straightforward (in Advanced VPN SetupRemote Endpoint i fill in the dyndns address?), but how do i setup "HOST" RV110W?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 23, 2011
We have about 200 sites connected to us via GRE tunnels over IPSEC over MPLS for primary connectivity, and GRE over IPSEC over the Internet for backup, and EIGRP routing handling the failover.
Most of them are 2811HSEC/K9's, and they're working great. We've recently discovered issues with a couple of clients. They run fine over their primary GRE over IPSEC connection, but when they failover to backup we're losing certain packets (details will follow).
What we found is that they're all on either 1941's or 2911's, and are running 15.0Mx IOS with advanced IP services. The rest of our clients are on 12.4T train, and none of them have any problems. We suspect it is an issue with the 15.x IOS.
Specifically, we're seeing two packets consistently lost. The first is a TCP 'SYN-ACK' from a telnet server, and the second is a UDP SIP REGISTER OK message. Both packets are quite small (well under 500 bytes), so I don't suspect an MTU issue. Packet captures both show that they're being encrypted and sent by the head-end, but are lost before they reach the decrypted tunnel interface. So either they're being lost in the path across the Internet, or the decryption is failing.
We see larger packets get through just fine, and other connections work great. We've opened a ticket with TAC.
Since these routers can't be downgraded to 12.4, our current plans are to ship a 2811HSEC bundle with an identical configuration to these clients to see if we can verify that it's a 15.0 issue, but I'm curious if anybody's seen anything similar, or if somebody who's more familiar than I am with bug tracker can find anything.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2012
I've got a network of SRP547Ws connected with site to site IPSec VPNs. But I can't get to the administrator loging page of the remote SRP547s over the VPN. Is there a setting or method I need to use ?
I have looked at the remote administration settings but this appears to be for adminsitration over the WAN interface rather the the IPSec VPN
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2012
Does RV180 router support client VPN connections using regular Cisco VPN client? Datasheet says it works with Quick VPN client.
If regular non-Quick client is not supported, can both clients coexist (= be installed simultaneously) on the same PC?
Does Quick VPN client support split tunneling?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2013
I make a vpn site-to-site IPSEC tunnel between 2 RV110W the above ,you will find the configuration
Site1
Site 2
always the same message
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2009
We want to implement an IPSec VPN between two routers cisco 2800 IOS version of what we need.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2013
Any news on a new firmware for the RV180? I have the most recent version but it still has lots of bugs. IPSec needs polishing. In addition the Logging functions don't work well. I can't send to a syslog and when I try to email the logs I get a email saying there is no data even though several pages of enteries are visible in the web GUI. I've checked the profiles and they are correct. I even tried using just the 'default' profile but no luck.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2012
We have Cisco SA520 and we want to use VPN to access the office servers from home. We have been able to configure the VPN server on the SA520 however the connection is very unstable.We use OS X 10.7 lion built-in Cisco compatible VPN clients and this is a typical output of ping from 3G mobile network to a server inside the office network. It works the same way also if I am trying to access from my home ADSL connection so the problem is not the instability of the 3G connection.
Some sample traffic sequeezed:
PING ns.svm (192.168.60.27): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.60.27: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=98.022 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.60.27: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=76.934 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.60.27: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=278.201 ms
[code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2009
I have a problem to configure a IPSEC VPN on the SA520W ( 1.0.39) with Cisco VPN Client (5.0.05.290). In the logs are following error:
ERROR: Could not find configuration for x.x.x.xERROR: Could not find configuration for x.x.x.xERROR: Could not find configuration for x.x.x.xERROR: Could not find configuration for x.x.x.x
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2013
Recently we have purchased a few SRP541W for our small branch office VPN sites. While working with the config I have discoved that when trying to create a IPSec VPN policy, I am limited to only one "remote network" entry. This is typically not how VPN tunnels are bulit. We generally put the following remote networks in the tunnel. How do I open a BUG ticket with Cisco and ask that they change the code?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2012
How to configure an IPSec VPN with router RV042G.I need to know how to configure an IPSec VPN. Cisco Router with RV042G.
I spend this client your VPN parameters. [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2012
We have about 9 1900 routers and 1 ASA 5510 for partail mesh VPN network. So 8 1900 connect to 1 1900 and ASA located in HQ and datacenter. All worked well however there is one site running really strange. The tunnel between 1900 is up for a while and down. Reboot router seems to be the only fix. But tunnel to ASA does not seem to be down at all.
The issue happened again today, we rebooted the router on site but tunnel still not up. DEBUG shows: deleting SA reason "Death by retransmission P1 "
I can see alot of Apr 24 19:57:55.271: ISAKMP:(0): retransmitting phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...
To me it seems like the IDE packet sent but never got reply and timed out. I did also check on the other end, the HQ. All other tunnels are still running fine on that router, just this remote site. Plus I got the similiar output when debugging on HQ router.
One thing do notice though, there was no match on both router for the ACL to match/permit ESP traffic... I asked on-site staff to reboot the modem used in remote site.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2009
WRVS4400N Version V2.0.0.7.I have been attempting for weeks to connect an IPSEC tunnel between a Cisco ASA 5510 Version 8.0(2) and a WRVS4400N . Phase one seems connect okay, where as phase two always give me the errors below. This as far as I have got, I tried disabling keep alive monitor, the device never attempted phase 2. I have read endless documentation on both devices and tried almost every combination of setting that I am aware of. The best case scenario answer would be detailed steps on how to setup the IPSEC VPN (linksys) & the site to site VPN (CISCO) as I cannot find any reference material for this combination .
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2013
I am not having much success setting up a IPSec VPN tunnel between a RV042 V3 running v4.0.0.07 firmware and PIX 525 running 8.0(4) code.
Let's say the configuration looks like this:
The RV042 has public IP 70.0.0.1 and private LAN IP 192.168.1.1 /24 The PIX has outside IP 69.0.0.1 and inside LAN IP 172.16.0.1 /24 The RV042 is running as DHCP server on it's private LAN A Windows server at 172.16.0.2 is the DHCP server on the PIX's inside LAN.
I've tried every option on the RV042 for Phase 1 and Phase 2, but I am not certain how to configure the Advanced features especially Aggressive Mode, Compress, Keep-Alive, AH Hash Algorithm and Dead Peer Detection.
On the PIX I've tried the basic setup through ADSM, but it's not as clear or obvious to configure both sides with compatible settings compared to setting up a tunnel between two RV042s.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 4, 2011
Here is the situation: A CISCO871 router is configured to establish an IP SEC tunnel with a CISCO ASA5520. The configuration is OK about that. I wish to configure the same CISCO871 in order to establish a LAN-to-LAN IP sec Tunnel with another CISCO871 at the same time in order to reach private network. So, I have followed the Cisco procedure Document ID: 71462 "LAN-to-LAN IP sec Tunnel Between Two Routers Configuration Example"; it works, I can reach the peer private network BUT ONLY when the IP SEC tunnel with ASA is not established.
It seems to be a routing problem...I don't find how to configure to make both tunnels up and functional at the same time.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2013
Our ISP supplies a Cisco SRP-521w router with our WIMax connection but I have had no experience with these and they look like a ex Linksys product? What they a like for use as a spoke router connected to the core hub (Cisco 2921 ISR G2)?We would be using a GRE Tunnel protected with IPsec 3DES encrypted.The SRP would be using PPPoE to authenticate to the ISP.Any known traps and limitations with the Cisco SRP-521w?We currently use a Cisco 877 for this but wanted to save them fr our adsl links
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2011
I'm working on setting up my Blackberry Playbook to access the network over our IPsec VPN however so far I have had no luck. I'm also posting this on the Blackberry playbook support forum.
Settings on BlackBerry Playbook
Server Address: My IP Address
Authentication type: XAuth-PSK
Group Username: remote.com
[Code].....
View 6 Replies
View Related
