Cisco Routers :: Rv220W / Assign Vpn Traffic To A Vlan When Setup An Ipsec Tunnel?

Apr 7, 2012

i'm using an rv220W and i whant to know if is it possible to assign vpn traffic to a vlan when i setup an ipsec tunnel?
 
example:
Im using different vlans on my rv220W.
Vlan 10: engineers (ex: 192.168.1.0/27) no intervlan routing
Vlan20: sales (ex: 10.0.123.0/24) no intervlan routing
 
 This is what i need:  - An engineer is on the road and when he makes a ipsec vpn connection => assignd to the vlan "engineers" so he can access the server/pc's in that vlan.and when someone from the sales group starts a vpn connection he needs to be in the vlan "sales" so he can access his pc/data,...

View 15 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Routers :: RV220W IPSec Tunnel Not Working

Sep 26, 2012

We have 2 RV220W Routers installed in seperate offices. We are attempting to setup a IPSec tunnel between the two sites. So far we have been unsuccessful in getting this to work.On both sides, we are getting a successful connection established, but netiher site is recieving any packets. Both sides are transmitting packets though. We have exhausted our resources trying to figure out why.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W - How To Force All Traffic From VLAN To Go Through VPN

Nov 21, 2012

Just setup two RV220Ws with a IPsec VPN connection.  All working well.  However, I have a question regarding how to force ALL traffic from a VLAN to go thru the VPN.IPsec from site A (EU) to site B (USA) working good.  On Site A I have a dedicated VLAN that needs to have ALL traffic (internet included) be sent thru the VPN tunnel.  The main purpose of this is to have internet presence as if in the USA.  This is necessary to access some sites available only in USA specially for the kids -their web sites will not display content because they're not in the USA at the moment.  How do I accomplish this?   I tried to setup a Static Route for the VLAN but you cannot setup a 0.0.0.0 destination route.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W VPN Setup For Connecting The Live Vpn Tunnel If Failed

Dec 20, 2012

I have a Cisco RV220W updated to latest firmware 1.0.4.17. I have been trying to get a VPN setup for the past few days without success. We had a test VPN up and running previously, but when we changed the IP's and secret key to connect the live VPN tunnel it failed and we haven't been able to get it working since.We have deleted both ends, rebuilt them probably 6 times each. We have changed secret keys, tried 3DES, AES, and AES256 encryptions with SHA-1. All the internal IP settings are correct :IE 192.168.1.1/24 or 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0,External IP's are right, only oddball thing here is one of the external IP's is assigned by DHCP and is a /22 although the previous tunnel worked with the same ISP.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W - How To Restrict Inter VLAN Or DMZ Traffic

May 9, 2011

I just received my rv220w and perhaps I haven't got enough experience with cisco routers. How can I restrict traffic between different VLANs?

For example: Hosts in one VLAN shall only be allowed to access a web server in another VLAN. All other traffic should be blocked. I've created two VLAN with Inter VLAN Routing enabled. But it seems there's no way to install a firewall rule between VLANs.

View 12 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RVL200 IPSEC Channel All Or Some Data Traffic Through Tunnel

Jan 2, 2013

Is it at all possible to channel all/some data traffic through an established ipsec tunneled connection using the RVL200? I have successfully established an ipsec connection through RVL200 and RV042 routers and are able to connect to servers/computers behind it.Now I want to channel all or some traffic through the ipsec-tunnel for computers that reside on 192.168.1.0 subnet of RVL200 network.
 
Main office - RV042 router - 10.200.62.1
Remote office - RVL200 router - 192.168.1.1
 
I am trying to use the Advanced Routing option to add static routes but I am not 100% sure if I am configuring the routes correctly.To give an example of routing DNS requests for HOTMAIL.COM [65.55.72.183]: [code]For some reason this does not appear to work. I have also tried using the interface setting of WAN and tested - this also does not work.

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: SRP541W / Setup IPSEC Tunnel To Be Able To Go From Subnet?

Jun 12, 2012

Is there any way to setup an IPSEC tunnel to be able to go from my subnet, 192.168.75.x and be able to reach anything on the other side of the tunnel, 192.168.X.X?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA Or 871 IPSec L2L To SSG-140 - Tunnel Is Up But No Traffic

Aug 8, 2012

i am curently troubleshooting a ipsec l2l VPN between
 
1. ASA 7.2(4) to SSG-140
2. Cisco 871W to SSG-140
 
In both scenario's the tunnel is nicely established, and traffic goes into the tunnel, but nothing comes out. All encap's, but no decap's                    
 
It seems like a routing issue, but we can not find anything on both sites.
 
So maybe i m running into a (known) issue between cisco VPN equipment and the SSG-140?
 
Could it be a proxy-id issue? Cause they configure stuff like 10.1.1.0/24 and i configure 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Set A VPN IpSec Tunnel GW To GW Tunnel Between RV110W

Oct 17, 2012

I am using a Cisco RV110W (Firmware 1.2.09) in a branch and I would like to create a VPN Tunnel to another site that has a Cisco RV042 (firmware v4.2.1.02)
 
What would be the correct Configuration? the current configuration I am using is
 
in the RV042 i am using
 
Check Enable 
Local Group Setup
Local Security Gateway Type : IP Only
IP Address : RV042 Pulbic IP address

[Code].....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 881 / Route Traffic Thru IPSec Tunnel To DMZ

Jun 29, 2011

I need to route traffic to DMZ (and internal) from the branch office thru the IPSec tunnel. How do I manage that with my Cisco 881?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5505 - IPSec VPN L2L Tunnel Up But No Traffic

Mar 19, 2011

I have a Site to Site IPSEC VPN Tunnel created with ASDM wizard.
 
Cisco ASA-5505
Peer A: x.x.x.x
Lan A:     192.168.0.0    255.255.255.0
 Fortinet FortiGate-50b
Peer B: y.y.y.y
Lan B:     192.168.23.0  255.255.255.0
 
I start traffic from LAN B with a ping (or telnet it doesn't matter) that receive no reply but tunnel goes up fine.
 
"show isakmp sa" seems ok (says "State   : MM_ACTIVE")
"show ipsec sa" seems ok but all #pkts are zero
 
try ftp, telnet from LAN B to LAN A systems but no one work. "show ipsec sa" all #pkts are zero As soon as I generate traffic from LAN A to LAN B these works (with tunnel already up) also traffic from LAN B to LAN A works.Obviously if I end VPN and start tunnel making traffic from LAN A all work fine bidirectionally, LAN A reach LAN B and LAN B reach LAN A.No msg logged in either two appliance.
 
Seems a very strange problem because seems not related to Phase1 or Phase2 already established.Traffic (routing ?) start works only after at least one packet goes from LAN A to LAN B.No msg logged in either two appliance.Problems begun in ASA version 8.0(4) ASDM version 6.1(3) and remain/continue after upgrade to ASA Version 8.4(1) ASDM version 6.4(1).

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 881 / Route All Traffic Over IPsec Tunnel?

Jan 30, 2012

We have 7 remote offices and 10 tower locations that utilize IPsec tunnels back to our HQ. We now want to force all traffic including web surfing through the tunnels. What would be the easiest way to acomplish this? I have tried utilizing the crypto map policy to do this, but was unable to acomplish this.
 
Each of our office locationss utilize a Cisco 2811 router and the tower locations utilize a Cisco 881.

View 21 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 1841 - IPsec Tunnel Two Way Traffic

Oct 23, 2012

We are currently experiencing a problem on an IP SEC VPN tunnel that has all of us here completely stumped. We are hoping that one of you experts out there will be able to assist. Here are some basic details:
 
NETWORKS
An IPSEC site to site tunnel has been built between the two sites on different networks.
PIX 515E - MAIN SITE
Network 172.16.0.0/24
CISCO 1841 - REMOTE SITE
Network 172.16.99.0/24
 
ISSUE
All traffic flows over the VPN from the 172.16.99.0 network in the direction of the Pix, such as RDP, SIP etc. Pings will go in both directions across the tunnel. Other than the pings most traffic will NOT flow over the tunnel from the 172.16.0.0 network on the pix to the 172.16.99.0 network on the 1841. It would appear that something on the 1841 is blocking traffic coming in over the tunnel from the 172.16.0.0 network as we can not get a wire shark capture on a PC on the 172.16.99.0 network, other than the ICMP traces. Usually this is an access list problem but we have checked and double checked the configuration and can't see anything.
 
TROUBLESHOOTING SO FAR
 
1. Have tried inserting various access list changes to the tunnel on the 1841 to make specific reference to the 172.16.0.0 network. 
2. Have tried various NAT entries. 
3. Have removed and then recreated the VPN tunnel from a fresh start. 
4. Have made the MTU 1400 on the inside interfaces on the Pix and the 1841.
 
The tunnel is fully up at all times and as we say can ping in both directions.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5505 - Forward All Traffic Over Ipsec Tunnel?

Jul 18, 2011

I currently have two Cisco ASA 5505.  They are at different  physical sites (SITE A, SITE B) and are configured with a site-to-site VPN which is  active and working.
 
I can communicate with the subnets on either site from the other and both are connected to the internet, however I need to ensure that all the traffic at my site B goes through this VPN to my site A.
 
I changed this access-list : access-list outside_2_cryptomap extended permit ip network_siteB network_siteA to access-list outside_2_cryptomap extended permit ip network_siteB any
 
But this does not work. If I do [URL], site B IP address  is not same that site A.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 5505 LAN-to-LAN IPsec VPN Tunnel Traffic Not Being Routed

Feb 24, 2011

I am trying to set up a LAN-to-LAN VPN tunnel between two sites.  One site has a 5505, and the other site has a 5510.  It looks like the tunnel is being established fine (both ISAKMP and IPSEC SAs look OK), but traffic doesn't appear to be routing across the internet between the devices. [code]

View 15 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1941 / IPSec Tunnel Up No Traffic?

Mar 7, 2013

I have an IPSec tunnel configured on my Cisco 1941. The other device is an ZyXEL router.I can see the tunnel is up but there is no traffic.This comes out the show crypto ipsec sa

interface: Dialer1
Crypto map tag: CMAP_AVW, local addr 10.10.10.89
   protected vrf: (none)
   local  ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (192.168.200.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
   remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (192.168.150.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
   current_peer 20.20.20.161 port 500

[code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Traffic Is Not Passing On Plain IPSec Tunnel Between Two 892s

Dec 14, 2011

I've replaced real networkID to the one mentined below.
 
Topology: classical IPSec VPN tunnel between two Cisco 892s, with pre-shared key and no GRE. One 892 (branch_892) has access to the Internet via PPPoE and has three networks/vlans behind it. One VLAN is NATed to access internet via the PPPoE. Access to two other VLANs - VL92 (100.100.200.0/24) and VL93 (100.100.100.0/24) need is done thrue the VPN tunnel.
 
Second 892 (892_DC) has just one interface - WAN on Gigabit enabled/connected and has a static route to the default GW. It does not have any interal network defined. So the router is strictly used to send traffic for VL92/VL93 to the branch 892 via IPSec tunnel.
 
Here is the problem: access to/from VL93 (100.100.100.0/24) works, however for VL92 (100.100.100.0/24) - does not.
 
From devices in VL92 I can ping the 892_DC IP address across the VPN tunnel. From the 892_DC router I can also ping devices in VL92. However I can no ping from VL92 any device beyond the 892_DC and at the same time packet arriving on 892_DC for VL92 are not sent out via the VPN tunnel.
 
I took the packet trace on 892_DC using capture point/buffer to capute packets for VL92 and could see that traffic does arrive at the 892_DC. I run the same capute on Branch_892 and there was not a single packet.More interesting I modified the access list such a way that left on VL92 and still - no packets are sent out thru the tunnel. [code]

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W IPsec VPN On Mac OS?

Sep 28, 2011

Cisco support write down manual (workaround), how to setup IPsec VPN connection on Mac OS 1.7?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5500 / TCP State Bypass For Traffic - Coming From IPsec Tunnel?

Feb 6, 2012

We have problems on central firewall with restricting traffic coming from remote office from IPsec. (The network sheme is attached) All branch offices are connected to central asa though IPsec. The main aim is to rule access from branch offices only on the central firewall, NOT on each IPsec tunnel According to the sheme:172.16.1.0/24 is on of the branch office LANs10.1.1.0/24 and 10.2.2.0/24 are central office LANThe crypto ACL looks like  permit ip 172.16.1.0/24 10.0.0.0/8 the aim is to restrict access from 172.16.1.0/24 to 10.1.1.0/24 When packets are generated from host 10.1.1.10 to 172.16.1.0/24 all is ok -  they are dropped by acl2 When packets are generated from 172.16.1.0/24 to 10.1.1.10 they are not dropped by any ACL - the reason is stateful firewall - traffic bypasses all access lists on a back path I thought that TCP State Bypass feature can solve this problem and disable stateful firewall inspection for traffic coming from 172.16.1.0/24 to 10.1.1.0/24, but it didn't work.The central asa 5500 is configured according to cisco doc [URL] 
 
access-list tcp_bypass_acl extended permit tcp 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
!
class-map tcp_bypass_map
description "TCP traffic that bypasses stateful firewall"
match access-list tcp_bypass_acl

[code].....

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: How To Setup IPSec Tunnel - 2320 And RVS4000

Aug 6, 2011

I have succesfully config an IPSec VPN Tunnel by using a Router Scientific Atlanta Cisco 2320 and a RVS4000 4-Port Gigabit Security Router with  VPN.On the site of Router Scientific Atlanta Cisco 2320 this is some info: [code] On the site of RVS4000 4-Port Gigabit Security Router with  VPN this is some info: [code] Remember that you can not be on the same range of IP, I mean, you can not have 192.168.0.X if the remote network is on 192.168.0.X, you have to change some of the Routers.I show the configuration on Router Scientific Atlanta Cisco 2320: I show the configuration on RVS4000 4-Port Gigabit Security Router with  VPN:If all is correctly configured, you should see on Router Scientific Atlanta Cisco 2320 the Status Connected:
 
If all is correctly configured, you should see on RVS4000 4-Port Gigabit Security Router with  VPN the Status Up.As you can see, I'm connected to the remote Router (RVS4000 4-Port Gigabit Security Router with  VPN) by my own web browser accesing by the local IP 192.168.0.10.I have used Authentication MD5, maybe is not the best one but I had no time to test SHA1, I will when I will have time.

View 1 Replies View Related

Networking :: To Tunnel All Routers Traffic Through SSH Tunnel With WRT300n

Jul 24, 2012

Environment :linksys wrt300n v1.1 which can have ddwrt-mega. Willing to tunnel all lan's outbound traffic through an ssh tunnel.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5540 - IPSec Tunnel / ASA Refuses To Encrypt Traffic But Decrypts It

May 31, 2012

This has to be the most weirdest issue I have seen since the past year on my ASA. I have an ASA 5540 running the 8.4(2) code without any issues until I stumbled upon this problem last week and I have spent sleepless nights with no resolution! So, take a deep breath and here is a brief description of my setup and the problem:
 
A Simple IPSEC tunnel between my ASA 5540 8.4(2) and a Juniper SSG 140 screen OS 6.3.0r9.0(route based VPN)
 
The tunnel comes up without any issues but the ASA refuses to encrypt the traffic but decrypts it with GLORY! below are some debug outputs, show outputs and a packet tracer output which also has an explanation of my WEIRD NAT issue:  

My setup - ( I wont get into the tunnel encryption details as my tunnel negotiations are **** perfect and comes up right off the bat when the ASA is configured as answer only)
 
CISCO ASA - IPSec networking details
LOCAL NETWORK - 10.2.4.0/28
REMOTE NETWORK - 192.168.171.8/32
JUNIPER SSG 140 - IPSec networking details
PROXY ID: LOCAL NETWORK - 192.168.171.8/32
REMOTE NETWORK - 10.2.4.0/28 
HOST NAME# sh cry ipsec sa peer <JUNIPER SSG PEER>
peer address: <JUNIPER SSG PEER>
[code]... 

As you can see, there is no echo reply packet at all as the packet is not being encapsulated while it is being sent back. I have been going mad with this. Also, this is a live production multi tenant firewall with no issues at all apart from this ****** ip sec tunnel to a juniper!!

Also, the 192.168.10.0/24 is another IP Sec tunnel remote network to this 10.2.4.0/28 network and this IP SEC tunnel has a similar Juniper SSG 140 screen os 6.3.0r9.0 at the remote end and this woks like a charm without any issues, but the 171 is not being encrypted by the ASA at all.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 800 - How To Setup Both Ends Of IPsec Tunnel Using Software Client

Sep 29, 2011

how to setup a both ends of an IPSEC VPN tunnel using a software client such as shrewsoft vpn and an 800 series router?
 
I've tried following the instructions on cisco's site, but I don't really understand which interface I should use? Dialer, VLAN1 or UnNumbered to a Loopback?
 
I'm OK with most basic features of the router, but never had any luck with VPNs?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W 1.0.2.4 - 6 To 4 Tunnel Did Not Initialize After Reboot

Aug 28, 2011

IPv6 -> Tunneling.The 6to4 tunnel did not initialize after a reboot. The automatic tunneling had to be disabled and enabled again.It was used for a 6in4 tunnel to tunnelbroker and the Remote End Point IPv4.Address was enabled and specified.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: IPsec VPN For Blackberry Playbook On RV220W

May 6, 2011

I'm working on setting up my Blackberry Playbook to access the network over our IPsec VPN however so far I have had no luck. I'm also posting this on the Blackberry playbook support forum.
 
Settings on BlackBerry Playbook
 
Server Address: My IP Address
Authentication type: XAuth-PSK
Group Username: remote.com

[Code].....

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Setting Up IPSec Connection On RV220W?

Aug 26, 2012

We bought a RV220W in order to get a VPN in our Small Business. The RV220W will only be used to let clients connect to it and not a tunnel between another VPN box.We could use QuickVPN, but it won't be working in our case, because in order to use QuickVPN, the router wants to change its IP 10.x.y.1. Because we have multiple servers/services that are using a static IP, it would be quite painful to change the subnet. Therefore, we would like to stay on the same subnet and change it in worst case scenario only. This is why QuickVPN is not an option here.We could use SSL VPN, but most of our clients who will connect to the VPN are using Windows 7 x64. I have tried the Windows 7 x64 fix told in the latest firmware release notes, but I can't get it to work on my computer, which is a Win7 x64. It might still be broken. Many of them are not very tech-savyy, so I can't tell them to use a virtual machine to connect.We want a secure connection, therefore IPSec is better than PPTP. I've been trying to setup IPSec for the past hours but I can't get it working. At first, I wanted to use an SSL certificate, but having no luck with this, I switched to a Pre-shared Key (PSK) in order to get things simpler. Eventually I would like to use an SSL certificate, however I would like to get PSK working first to confirm that the IPSec connection is working.
 
I have attached with this post, screenshots of the IKE and VPN Policies. I have used the VPN Wizard in order to complete these fields. The local identifier is the WAN DynDNS FQDN. However, as for the remote FQDN, there should be none really, because clients are connecting to it, so the RV220W won't know in advance who's connecting and from where. I have read that when using the Responder type, the remote settings should not matter. Also, the PSK is 25 caracters long.After setting the RV220W up, I have set up a L2TP/IPSec VPN connection on my Windows 7­. I have set up the connection to connect to the DynDNS address and set up the PSK in the Advanced settings. After I typed my IPSec username and password to connect (which was created in the IPSec users section), Windows tries to connect and times out :
 
Error 789 : The L2TP connection attempt failed because the security layer encountered a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer.
 
At the same time on the RV220W, this error shows up in the logs :
 
2012-08-26 23:45:24: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR:  Could not find configuration for 24.54.xx.xx[500]
 
I can't figure out what I am doing wrong. I've read the Administration manual quite a few times and it seems that I have followed everything by the book.I have tried to enable/disable my Windows firewall, but did not get any luck. The RV220W is located at a remote office, to make sure that I can connect from the outside, before you think that I'm trying to connect to the outside, from the inside I have changed few settings in the IKE policy to try to make it work. Settings such as the Exchange Mode, because I've read that the Aggressive mode had issues. At this moment, the settings are back to default, once the wizard has been run. I'm thinking about setting a PPTP to confirm that this works, then move up to IPSec PSK, then to IPSec SSL Certificate.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220w Configure For Ipsec Vpn Connections

Jan 2, 2013

I have an RV220w in office, which I have configure it for ipsec vpn connections. Behind router there is a NAS for file storage. [code]I have managed to connect to router from my home with ShrewVPN and I can ping every client connected to RV220w.The problem is that I can't connect to neither to router's web interface nor to NAS web interface or any other intranet web page ( the browser doesn't give any error, but keeps loading without showing the web page). Although, I can access web pages from my laptop.Also, in windows file explorer when I connect to NAS, although I can browse folders I can't copy files from my laptop to NAS and vice versa, I always get timeout error (I have checked the permissions to NAS and in addition I succeed to copy a small txt file 1kb, but no luck with bigger files).I also tried with QuickVPN client, but I had the same results. When I connect with pptp from windows everything works like a charm.My laptop has windows 7 64bit.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: File Sharing Over IPsec With RV220W

Apr 20, 2012

originally had two Netgear FVS318s set up with a VPN tunnel and everything worked as expected. I could connect to the server at the office from a machine at home and browse the files and more importantly do nightly backups of files that had changed at the office over the VPN to the house. The problem with the FVS318s was that for wireless I had to have another device and that the WAN to LAN throughput was something like 7Mbps. Kind of limiting when you consistently get 22Mbps from the ISP.So, I bought two Cisco RV220Ws to replace them with. I started by replacing the one at home and was able to get it going with the FVS318 at the office. The VPN was stable and I had no problem browsing the files on the server as I had already been doing. A couple weeks later I replaced the FVS318 at the office with the other RV220W and the VPN came up fine but I lost all ability to file share between the two sites. I've watched the phase 1 and 2 negotiations and they look good from both ends. =

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: PIX515 / 2821 / 2921 / Getting GRE IPsec Tunnel Setup?

Apr 18, 2013

We are setting up an old office building as an offsite data center. The network cosists on a PIX 501 firewall and a 2811 router.  I am attempting to setup a GRE tunnel over IPsec back to the main office.  The main office consists of a PIX515, a 2821 router, and a 2921 router.  
 
There is also an ASA5510 in our main office that is used as our primary connection for all of our external services and as a GRE endpoint for our other offices.  The PIX515 is used to connect our main office clients to the internet and we would like traffic between it and our offsite data center to go across it as well.   The default route is to use the ASA.   We used policy based routing on the 2821 and 2921 routers to direct the appropriate traffic to the PIX515.  Right now I am not able to get the tunnel setup.  It appears that the offsite datacenter is sending packets but is not receiving any when I issue the “show crypto ipsec sa” commands on both firewalls.  I will show the output of that command below. 
 
Main Office The external address     198.40.227.50. The loopback address   10.254.10.6 The tunnel address        10.2.60.1
 Offsite Datacenter The external address     198.40.254.178 The loopback address   10.254.60.6 The tunnel address        10.2.60.2
 
The main office PIX515 Config :

PIX Version 7.2(2)
!
interface Ethernet0
mac-address 5475.d0ba.5012
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address 198.40.227.50 255.255.255.240

[code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W - Port Forwarding Collides With IPSec?

Feb 1, 2012

I have a setup with 2 RV220W at 2 locations.Both with the latest Firmware (1.0.3.5). I configured portforwarding for RDP at one site. Works perfekt. I also configured an IPSec VPN between the 2 sites. Works too.
 
Configuration overview:
Site_1:
- IPSec VPN to site_2
 Site_2:
- IPSec VPN to site_1
- Port forwarding for RDP to a local server (server_2)
 
My first problem is that i can ping server_2 through the VPN from a pc within site_1 but i can not access this server via RDP. As soon as i disable the Portforwarding for RDP at site_2, RDP via VPN works! I assume, that the RV220W mixes up portforwarding and VPN.I tried to set up an additional firewall rule at site_2 allowing the traffic between the local networks of both sites without restrictions and place this rule at toe top. But here is my second problem: I can not add any destination network to the firewall settings (firewall-->access rules). I only allows me to define a host to redirect the traffic to.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Windows 7 32 Bit IPSec Client To RV220W Error 789

Oct 9, 2012

I try to connect to RV220W with windows 7 client but  I fail : error 789. I compare again and again pre shared key, but it doesn't change anything. How to connect to RV220W with IPsec client ?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Make IPSec VPN Connection From IPhone To RV220W

Aug 22, 2011

i have try to make a IPSec VPN Connection from my iPhone to my RV220W.
 
On the iPhone i get the message "The VPN Server was not found".
 
It is possible to make a IPSec Connection or only a PPTP ?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 1841 - IP / Assign Routers To Test Pinging And Getting Traffic Flowing?

Jun 3, 2013

I have two 1841's, setting up a Lab WAN in Packet Tracer. I have one of the 1841's run to a DSL modem, then out to the cloud and the same setup on the other end... from the cloud to the DSL modem and to the 1841 on that end... I have all green lights, so that tells me layer 2 is up, but I'm trying to figure out

what IP to assign the routers to test pinging and getting traffic flowing. but the DSL Modem's have the public IP's and dynamically assign an IP to the routers? I've also tried setting up a static IP on the routers fa0/0 interfaces and the pings fail.. Wondering what I am missing to get these two talking.

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved