we have a 2800 series router functioning as our internet router and it will only forward packets to addresses with host entries in the routing table even if the network is directly connected.
View 18 RepliesIs there a way to set static routes per VLAN?Example VLAN 100 sends all traffic to 192.168.1.1 and VLAN 200 sends all traffic to 10.1.1.1. (2800 Series RTR)I have 5 networks that have their own gateway to the Internet via satellite link. Those networks run over the same infrastructure on separate VLANs. They frequently send traffic to each other, which gets sent over a slow SAT link. I introduced a router to the network and would like to set all my hosts default gateway to the local routers sub-interface then have a static route that send all traffic that is not on one of my 5 networks back to that VLANs respective SAT modem to get routed out over the Internet.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a 2811 router that I want to configure the F/E 0/0 & 0/1 to be able to communicate.FE 0/0 is configured with 192.168.16.1/24.FE 0/1 is configured with 10.10.10.10/24 Physically attached to this port is going to be a wireless router configured with 10.10.10.1.My question is how to configure and setup the routes properly and do I need to configure NAT and Access Lists.
View 9 Replies View RelatedOn a 4507 v12.2(20)EW, the connected subnets which are declared in the ospf instance are not propagated to the MPLS carrier router.Only the static routes which are redistributed in the ospf instance are propagated to the MPLS carrier router.
View 1 Replies View RelatedNeeding to upgrade IOS on 2800 router from c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.123-14.T7.bin to c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-15.T13.bin. I noticed ther are several other files on the old code that may needed for booting up router but Im running low on memory. The other existing files are ;
c2800nm-advsecurityk9-mz.124-3i.bin
securedesktop-ios-3.1.1.45-k9.pkg
sslclient-win-1.1.4.176.pkg
Do I need these files for the upgrade or can i delete them when upgrading to 124-15.T13.bin. ?
I have Router 2800 series Global nating is configured on it.
ip nat inside source list 111 interface Dialer1 overload
!
access-list 111 deny ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 111 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
My object is that i want give internet access only for few users ip E.g IPs addresses from range 192.168.1.0-10 can acess intenet access other all are deny.How i do this with ACL .
I have 2800 series router which is directly connected to ISP. How can secure the router from outside access; I am totally new to the security concepts.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a pair of router Cisco 2800 running in HSRP, now I want to configure one sub interface with another sub net, Will my current IP on physical interface work or do I need to create two Sub interfaces for each network. Do i must need encapsulation on sub interface
Current Config:-
Router 1:-
interface FastEthernet0/1description Connect to LAN_SW1 Gi1/0/1ip address 192.168.1.13 255.255.255.0no ip redirectsduplex autospeed autostandby 1 ip 192.168.1.1standby 1 priority 90standby 1 preempt
Router 2:-
interface FastEthernet0/1description Connect to LAN_SW2 Gi1/0/1ip address 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0no ip redirectsduplex autospeed autostandby 1 ip 192.168.1.1standby 1 priority 110standby 1 preempt
For second network I do not require HSRP
Router 1:-
interface FastEthernet0/0description Connect to LAN_SW1 Gi1/0/1no ip addressduplex fullspeed 100
[ code]...
Router 2:-
interface FastEthernet0/0description Connect to LAN_SW2 Gi1/0/1no ip addressduplex fullspeed 100
[Code]...
I am trying to add WCCP to be configured for websense. My first option seems to be either purchase an IPServices license for the stack of 3750E switches, but i am thinking this will require us to license all three switches in the stack. The second option i am looking at is to do the WCCP configuration on the 2800 router we have on the edge. The problem is both Gig ports are in use, one going to the firewall and the second going to the ISP. My first question would be, which option is better in terms of manging as well as cost of implementing it.The second question is, if WCCP on the router is a better option, what is the add on module i should be looking to get to add the additional ports to hook up the Websense cache.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI got a Cisco 2800 router and am planning to use FastEthernet 0/1 to trunk in 802.11Q VLAN's to cater for some of our radio links. speed and operation of the sub-interface that will be created. Or explain it here. We got a radio link that we want to trunk into this Cisco 2800 and it is suppose to be connecting at 100Mbps but currently operating at around 80Mbps. Reports shows that the max in and out traffic for this link this year till today is 25Mbps. Will it not fail teh CPU etc ?
interface FastEthernet0/1
no ip address
!
[Code]....
I wan to migrate from a router 2800 to L3 switch 3750G , the thing is that we have several vlans and we use a router sometimes with each interface configure with correspoinding vlan subnet ip to route traffic between vlans there is no static or dynamic routing only directly connected interfaces on router routing traffic to each other ?How would i configure a L3 switch interface for simillar functionality , below is my current router configuration
!
ip domain name yourdomain.com
multilink bundle-name authenticated
!
vtp mode transparent
[code]...
I need to forward port 2875 from any public address to an internal address 192.168.20.103. I am not getting something right because it will not work. Below is my config.
Current configuration : 11012 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 23:30:24 UTC Fri Apr 12 2002 by cisco
!
[Code]....
We have recently implemented Windows Deployment Services on our local network, but everytime we do a multicast image deployment the network get flooded to point of total saturation.
We have Netgear switches and a Cisco 2800 series router. IGMP Snooping has been enabled on all Switches, however, we are unsure on how to implement multicasting on the router.
The whole network is flat - no VLANs over than the default VLAN1. We only want multicasting to work within our local network and does not need to go out the other side of the router as that is the connection to the internet.
How to get the Cisco router configured properly to enable multicasting to not flood the network. It seems that even if we were to image 4 PCs using multicast this is enough to completely get the network flooded.
Also, am I right in thinking that IGMP needs to be enabled on all of the Switches?
I just read the Removing and Installing CompactFlash Memory Cards in Cisco 2800 Series Routers instructions and there was nothing said regading powering down the router. Are these CompactFlash cards hot swappable??
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am new to the ASA series and I am at a complete loss as to why I cannot configure this router to forward SMTP and RDP traffic to an internal host.
The packet trace tool in ASDM shows complete end-to-end connectivity for RDP but it still fails to connect from outside. This is my config file, what I need to change in order to make it work?
I have a 1941 router configured for Policy based routing with two ISPs.Two static default routes configured to point the gateways of respoective ISPs with same metric.But the problem is, packets are going throug the one ISP only while doing traceroute.
N/W connectivity:
ISP1-----> <----------------------> LAN1
| Router |
ISP-------> <----------------------> LAN 2
Below is my configuration :
Current configuration : 5958 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 05:18:56 UTC Mon Jun 25 2012
!
version 15.0
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
[code]....
I have a pair of N5K's, down stream from them are from Fabric Interconnects and a UCS chassis. Upstream is a stack of 3750's then ASA5510's.
I am trying to backup the config to our TFTP server and I am getting 'no route to host'.. I tried to add a route, and found that N5K uses VRF's for routing?? .. After some looking I see there are two base VRF's 'management' and 'default'.. the management VRF has a default gateway entry and a single interface member (mgmt0).. when I look at the default VRF .. there are no interface members or routing entries.. Ok, I can handle that just add some interfaces and add a default gateway. Then I get lost:
I'm able to access the UCS manager..... so how the heck is that even possible if there's no gateway defined anywhere (or maybe I'm missing something?). My theory was: add all other ports but mgmt0 to the default VRF, and have the default gateway point out of the uplinks (a vPC).. but wasn't sure how that would affect anything and mainly just wanted to know how I was able to access the UCS manager in light of the fact that there is no default gateway anywhere that I could see...
We have a need to track specifc subnets on our two 6509s, running IOS version 12.2(18)SXF16. Basically, we want to do this:
track 1 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.252 reachability
track 2 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.252 reachability
However, the 6509 IOS only provides the option to track an interface. Is this a feature that's available in later IOS versions?
Is there another way to track these routes? The subnets are used for WAN links at a HQ and DR site and we are doing a specific PBR (sending all http/https traffic) using these subnets. If that WAN link goes down, we want to be able to utilize a backup WAN link to support that traffic.
I would like to configure few routings on my Cisco router 871 in order to allow my employees to have access only to specific websites.However, since some websites have dynamic IPs propably the route that I will create will not work.
My question is, can I configure a route or is there any other way to configure this permission based on the hostname/domain? For example, if I want to permit access to this website www.surveymonkey.com (75.98.93.51) instead of configuring:
ip route 75.98.93.51 255.255.255.255 192.168.10.250
is there any way to configure based on the url.. in order to be able to recognise this host correctly??
Im new to cisco routes, Im traing to configure a 1711 routes with a dsl 2wire routes, my problem is that Im able to ping anywhere in the routes, but when Im on my computer I can only ping the interfaces on the router but no the 2wire route that gives me access to the internet.
Cisco 1711 2wire
f0 192.168.200.1(Inside NAT) e0 192.168.1.76( 2wire Nat) 192.168.1.254 (Internet)
My computer is getting ip addres 192.168.200.100 when I ping th 192.168.1.76 is fine, but when I try to ping the 192.168.1.254 does not work, Im assuming the cisco has activated a dinamic route from .76 to .254, but it is not working, why?
Here is the router configuration
Router#show runBuilding configuration...
Current configuration : 1183 bytes!version 12.3service timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname Router!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!!no aaa new-model!resource policy!memory-size iomem 25ip subnet-zero!!no ip dhcp [Code]....
6500 - version (s72033_rp-ENTSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXF17a.I have two ISP's. I have created two defaults as follow & secondary route does not work. [code] After disabling the interface to ISP1, backup routes does not work. [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a scenario which is fairly common - certain servers are accessed from the internet via a Load Balancer, and since seeing true client IP is a requirement, the return traffic path must go back through the load balancer. However, I do not want to route all traffic via the load balancer for obvious performance reasons. Internal traffic should be routed directly by the Layer 3 switch, which has a default route of a Firewall.
My plan is to use a VRF for the load balancer and any applicable servers, which works fine. But now I need to join the VRF's routing table with the switch's GRT (global routing table) so that internal traffic works. What is the best way to do this? For scalability reasons I'd like to avoid static routes and I see many examples using BGP, but in this case it seems overkill since everything is on a single logical switch. Can I use OSPF instead? Or a different method? The Supervisors will be 2Ts, so IOS 15.0 will likely be running.
The layer 2 switches are connected to layer 3 Switch via trunks, and routing between layer 2 switch ports with configured SVI's on 3550. All working fine. Now I'm trying to configure routing between 2800 and 3550, I tried connecting both Straight Throught and Crossover cables to the 2800 Fa0/0 and Fa0/1 ports as well as the switchports on 3550
No switchport commands are configured however, the lights do not go on for both straight through or crossover cables. I tried connecting 1750 routers but same result. My goal is to have all the VLANS routed to the internet with configuring NAT translation the router.
How filter inbound routes in Cisco ASA OSPF? Because Cisco ASA has no "distibute-list" command for OSFP process configuration, I try to use "filter-list" command in area definition. So, I try to use next configuration:
R1 (Cisco 3660):
skip
!
router ospf 1
[Code].....
I have a Routing issue with one of my SG300-28P units. It has several Trunked VLANs. I think I habe Narrowed it down to a Default Route on the offending SG300 though I cannot see to change or delete any of the Static Routes on the unit. I can Add Routes with no issues, but once Added I cannot Edit or delete them.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm a bit perplexed atm with trying to set up multiple failover routes on a 2821 router. Let me say that I have more experieince in a switched network as routing is seldom required where I work atm. Here's my problem. I have a routing table set up as follows but only the primary routes work. The failover routes will not kick in once the primary route is not there.
ip route 10.32.11.0 255.255.255.0 128.32.8.11
ip route 10.32.11.0 255.255.255.0 128.32.24.11 100
ip route 10.32.12.0 255.255.255.0 128.32.8.12
ip route 10.32.12.0 255.255.255.0 128.32.24.12 100
ip route 10.32.14.0 255.255.255.0 128.32.8.14
ip route 10.32.14.0 255.255.255.0 128.32.24.14 100
Ip addresses are not exact but it gets the point across.
Why the failover routes are not failing over? The failover routes work if I remove the primary route from the config.
I am observing some strange behaviour related to the routing table, almost all external routes and some inter-area routes are getting refreshed every 10 seconds.
I am getting more than 1000 entries after running 'sh ip route | i 00:00:0', these external routes are being advertised by a neighbor 6500 which redistributing these static routes.
Platform is 6500 with SUP-720
I've problem with IP SLA probes between two different routers.2900 (c2900-universalk9_npe-mz.SPA.151-4.M4.bin) here is set "ip sla responder" only and 2800 (c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T2.bin) here is set two type of tests "udp-jitter" and "icmp-jitter" - temporary, used to check for availability of 2900 router.As a result, I've what udp-jitter doesn't work at the same time icmp-jitter test is OK.Here are the settings of IP SLA tests
ip sla 281
icmp-jitter 172.25.28.1 source-ip 192.168.28.6 num-packets 100
tos 128
frequency 120
ip sla schedule 281 life forever start-time after 00:05:45
[code]...
Is it possible to issue eigrp leaking routes on catalyst 6500 running IOS 12.2-33SXI9 on gigabitethernet interfaces? or is there another way to acomplish this?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have a 3560 with IP base that is acting as a true EIGRP stub router today. It advertises local routes to the upstream service provider router and receives a default route.
Now I want to connect a 3900 ISR as a voice gateway. The 3560 does not seem to be advertising any routes to the 3900. Ok the EIGRP stub doc says this:
Only specified routes are propagated from the remote (stub) router. The router responds to queries for summaries, connected routes, redistributed static routes, external routes, and internal routes with the message "inaccessible." A router that is configured as a stub will send a special peer information packet to all neighboring routers to report its status as a stub router.
# Any neighbor that receives a packet informing it of the stub status will not query the stub router for any routes, and a router that has a stub peer will not query that peer. The stub router will depend on the distribution router to send the proper updates to all peers.
I guess I don't understand why the stub advertises local routes to the upstream ISP router but does not seem to advertise routes to the 3900. Does the stub identify the ISP router as the distribution router somehow, thus differentiating it from the 3900? If so, how is this done?
show ip eigrp neighbor detail on the 3900:
EIGRP-IPv4 Neighbors for AS(100)
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
(sec) (ms) Cnt Num
[Code].....
I have a WS-C3750G-24T-S layer 3 switch and I need to configure independent routes for a specific network, I'm trying to use VRF but it is not working for me. I tried using route-map but it seems the switch doesn't support that, so I'm stuck with VRF, but I think I'm not doing it right. The topology is as follows:
I have a network directly connected to a vlan and I need to forward all the traffic I get on this VLAN using a tunnel to a router. I think the problem is that in order to use the tunnel I need to utilize another VLAN which isn't part of that VRF. I attach the configuration I'm using to better understand what I'm trying to do:
layer-3 switch:
ip vrf TEST
rd 1:1
interface Tunnel1
ip vrf forwarding TEST
ip address 172.17.0.1 255.255.255.252
tunnel source 10.245.0.9
tunnel destination 10.250.4.31
[Code]....
And this is how my routing table looks on this router:
172.17.0.0/30 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 172.17.0.0 is directly connected, Tunnel4
C 10.250.4.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan404
S 10.245.0.8/29 [1/0] via 10.250.4.1
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 10.1.60.15
We have a 6509 series of core switches and 3750 series of L2 switches, There is no default gateway or any static routes to any IP.VLAN 1 is made admin down and another vlan is used for all communication here in this environment
Attached is configuration for reference But still I am able to take telnet or SSH. I want to know how telnet or SSH or tacacs authentication happens without any static or default route.
If a router receives EIGRP (AD90) routes, and is configured to redistribute thoes routes into BGP(AD20), why does the RIB show only the incoming EIGRP routes and not the redistributed bgp routes? Are redistributed routes considered for RIB entry in the router that is doing the redistribution
View 2 Replies View Related