Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 Port Security And Voice Vlan On Newer IOS
May 20, 2010
For many years we've had the following vlan and port security config on our 3560s: [code] This has worked great on 12.2(37)SE1, 12.2(40)SE and 12.2(46)SE. However since 12.2(50)SE, and I've tried all the versions since then, we have a problem with 7900 phones and ATA186s taking upwards of 20 minutes before they can get a valid IP number.The problem on the newer IOSes seems to be related to the inactivity aging.On the older IOS versions the mac address of the voice device appears on the voice vlan straight away.
On the newer IOS versions the mac address of the voice device appears on the DATA vlan and seems to be stuck there until the inactivity aging removes it. It then gets re-learned, sometimes on the voice vlan, and sometimes on the data vlan. If you're unlucky and it gets re-learned on the data vlan you've got to wait until the inactivity time ages the address out again. Repeat until the mac address eventually gets learned on the voice vlan. I don't want to be stuck on 12.2(46)SE forever.
Any way to test in a lab what would happen if a tech mistakingly added "switchport voice vlan XX" to a trunk port? I am try to do some RCA on an issue and this has been identified as a possible cause by one of my techs.
The config is Switch1------Switch2--------Switch3 Each interswitch connection is configured as a dot1q trunk with all vlans allowed. The link between switch2 and 3 is where switchport voice vlan 10 was added. Switch1 is a 3750 and 2/3 are 3560's.
I have a 3560 switch with the following ports config [code] I would like to use theses ports on a different vlan to connect 4 pc's to them. Can I just remove them from the vlan, remove the trunk switchport and set up on the vlan i want them on with no trunking?
I'm new to networking and was looking for some assistance. First off im using packet tracer to diagram my senario as I will be receiving my equipment next week to deploy.
Hardware to be used:
1. 2 catalyst 3560 switches 2. all connect to a sonic wall router
I have two companies that work in the same office space. I need to keep these companies seperate on their own vlan. They will however need to share the phone system.(Packet tracer file uploaded to give those who have the time to see what I put together.) [code]
I have 2 3560 switches that are running 12.2(25)SEE2. Port security is enabled on some of the ports. Whenever there is a power failure, when power is restored, 1 port on each switch goes to err-disabled. The mac address that causes this is a valid address for that port. Below is the configuration on one of the ports.
We are trying to config vlan 10 for data and vlan 20 for voice on the same port - port 1 of swtich SF300-24P to run both data and voice on different vlans.Do I have to add vlan 10 as an untagged vlan to port 1 and add vlan 20 as an tagged vlan to port 1?If I do not want to assign the native vlan 1 to port 1, how can I remove it ? The GUI page - assign VLAN to port does not allow to remove it.Aslo, what mode shall I set up on port 1? General, trunk or access ?
I have set up 2 DHCP pools and 2 VLANs (1 *the native* for data / 1 VLAN for voice). When I use the command "switchport voice vlan 20" the port disapear from the show vlan brief list. When I use the "switchport access vlan 20" it shows up in the show vlan brief in the correct VLAN and gives the phone an IP. I assume that using the access instead of the voice is wrong and the phones would not configure correctly. But when I use the access the phone goes to the next step and tells me the TFTP files are not found. Why does the port disapear from the VLAN list?
Between our hosting and a customer we have an extended vlan, traveling on a fiber, between two cisco 3560 switches.The thing is, that we want to create one or more vlans inside that extended vlan, in some way if possible?
I'm using CISCO 3524 switch as access switch and trying to enable voice vlan in fast eth ports as below.
L3 vlans are created in core switches which is cisco 6509 vlan 1 - data vlan vlan 2 - voice vlan in cisco 3524
[code]....
if i use the above configs, the phone which is connected to interface fa0/1 is not taking ip from dhcp server. even it didn't work with static configs.while troubelshooting, i have configured as below and it's started working..
int fa0/1 switchport acces vlan 2 speed 100 duplex full.
in this case i can't use this port for data connectivity where as it's required for data too.
I have CME on Router 2800 series, and switch 2960 PoE connected to this router.On 2960 switch, there is existing 7945 IP Phone that already work properly and get IP 14.x.x.x from voice vlan 2.
Problem is when I add cisco 6921 IP Phone connect to 2960 switch, it get data vlan 10.x.x.x, not voice Vlan 14.x.x.x I have check CDP and it use CDP v2
Config on 2960:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/34 <--- this is connected to IP Phone 7945 switchport mode access switchport voice vlan 2 spanning-tree portfast
[code]....
With same config and condition on port 2960, why the IP Phone 6921 can't get voice vlan 14.x.x.x, whereas IP Phone 7945 can get voice vlan 14.x.x.x
If we configure a Voice and Data VLAn on a switch. And connect EX90 on voice VLAN and PCwith EX90 terminals. Than can we able to share a presentation or data with EX90 or not?
i am facing a strange issue on cisco 2950 .IOS (tm) C2950 Software (C2950-I6K2L2Q4-M), Version 12.1(22)EA9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) suddenly my phone stopped working for DTMF tone, i mean when i dial a conference bridge lets say 6565 and then it ask for conference bridge code lets say 12345, it doesnt recognize the code and says code is invalid, SIP Proxy is Asterisk in this case.Currently my cisco switch port is configured for dual data + voice vlan, where DTMF dont work, sample config below [code]
im working in a new enviroment and want to makes some design changes to the environment. I wanted to bounce my ideas some of you folks to see if my thinking is on the right path or maybe i could do things better.
Setup:
Currently the setup that i manage includes and Sonic Wall (also dishes out dhcp), HP 1810 "Core Switch" and 3 SG 300-28P cisco managed switches. (all cisco switches tie back into the HP) The router is managed by the isp. There is only one vlan with all traffic going across it.
Obviously the glaring issue here is that voice and data all reside on the same vlan. Correct me if i am thinking incorrectly but the first step would be to create a separate vlan for the phones with its own IP scheme. currently phones are issued addresses from the 150-200 range and everything else is left for pc's, printers etc. To my knowledge the HP switch does layer 3 but i do not know much about it. There are vpn tunnels to remote offices that are used for sharepoint, email and to access other services. Trying to wrap my mind around the environment as a whole so i may be missing something obvious i could do design wise to improve.
I am trying to write an extended ACL for the voice vlan.My scenario is the following:I have two PBXs with two Catalyst 4505 L3 switches.The C4505 are connected trough a trunk link.I have a VTP domain configured.
Voice VLANs are Vlan 100 and Vlan 101 with networks 10.2.0.0/16 and 10.4.0.0/16 Voip telephones are communicating between them self and everything is working fine.I want to secure both voice VLANs with an ACL to allow only couple of IPs to administer the phones.The PCs are connected trough a integrated switch via VOIP telephone.Here is the sample configuration of the dhcp pool for the PC VLAN:
ip dhcp pool PCs network 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 default-router 10.1.1.1 dns-server 10.10.10.1 option 43 hex 010a.5369.656d.656e.7300.0000.0204.0000.0064.0000.0000.00ff
I had to implement the 43 hex option because the PCs did not get the ip from the DHCP because of the vendor specific information.The thing that worries me is will the DHCP forward the ACKs for the PCs if I implement this test ACL:
ip access-list extended VLAN100 permit ip 10.2.0.0 0.0.255.255 10.4.0.0 0.0.255.255 permit ip 10.4.0.0 0.0.255.255 10.2.0.0 0.0.255.255 permit ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 10.2.0.0 0.0.255.255 permit ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 10.4.0.0 0.0.255.255 permit udp host 0.0.0.0 eq bootpc host 255.255.255.255 eq bootps (this I am not sure do I need) permit udp host 255.255.255.255 eq bootps host 0.0.0.0 eq bootpc (also this) deny ip any any
I only want to allow the network 192.168.2.0/24 and maybe some other hosts to access the web based http gui to adiminister the IP phones.All PCs are connected trough the VOIP terminals. I do not want to deny the traffic to PCs.
I have a Cisco 6509 with IOS "s222-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF16.bin"I need to enable dot1x on user's ports on the switch. each user is connected to the switch through the IP phone.
I just found out that I can not enabled dot1x on trunk port. I have tried to use "switchport voice vlan " but I got:
Is there any way to check if this VLAN is used by somedevice?
Cisco3560#sh ip int b Vlan55 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
Cisco3560#sh vlan VLAN Name Status Ports ---- -------------------------------- --------- ------------------------------- 1 default active 55 Print active Fa0/5, Fa0/6, Fa0/7, Fa0/8
I have 4 vlan and all has conectivity/access with all (VLAN10,VLAN20,VLAN30 and VLAN40, I use a 3560 Switch for this propose, I need to modificate one vlan (VLAN40) that has access to the rest of the VLAN's BUT the rest of the VLAN's dont have access to VLAN40. I know that it is a problem of access-list BUT I can't undertand how to obtain the result that I like
I have 2 locations, at a distance of 600KM.These two locations are well connected by Point to Point L2 VLAN with a speed of 2 MBPS and supported by CISCO 3560G switches.Location A has a VLAN to communicate to the other VLAN at Location B. Location B has also got 3 VLANS which are inter connected with Location A.Now the hardware in one of VLANs in Location B has moved to Location A for obvious reasons.
For further refernce am giving the VLAN IP address here....
Location A VLAN1 for communicatng to Location B IP Range 172.20.44.210 Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway 172.20.44.210 VLAN2 for the desktops in Location A IP Range 192.193.194.1-255 Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway 192.193.194.1
I have an environment of 3 X 3560G of which I have 1st switch-CORE(f0/10) connecting to the VPN router(CE) interface-f0/0. Remaining 2 Cisco 3560's(Access) are connected to Gi0/1 and Gi0/2 on the 1st switch-CORE via gi0/1 . On all three switches I have created multiple VLANs and assigned ports to these VLAN. The switch to switch connection is trunk allowing all VLANs created on all these 3 switches. Now the issue is how I am going to have all these VLANs routed through single interface on the routeri-e f0/0, as all these subnets will communicating to remote site over VPN. What should be default gateway on the 2 Access switches and the CORE switch, also what static route should be on router to reach all subnets(VLANs) created on these 3 switches.
I have read inter-VLAN routing i-e creating sub interfaces on router but dont want to proceed with that and looking for any other way to have my VLANs talk on all three switches and then are accessible to remote site ove VPN?
We recently purchased Cisco 3560X Layer3 Switch. We need to perform simple Inter VLAN routing. We have configured VLAN1 (name-server_vlan) and VLAN2 (name- user_vlan). We have also assigned the Ports and IP address to both the VLANs. After assiging this if we plug Laptop A into VLAN1 then it doesnt communicates with Laptop B (btw, Laptop A is able to Ping VLAN2 Gateway ) in VLAN2 but on the other hand Laptop B is able to communicate with Laptop A and ping everything i.e. Gateway of VLAN1.
recently i just connected a non cisco ip phone(from panasonic) to Cisco 2960 POE switch at site A. The PABX system is located at site B,Site A and site B are connected using MetroE Point to point.I would like to apply QoS for voice vlan. I want to assign 2MB to the point to point connection for voice vlan.
I have a 3560 switch with 1 VLAN (VLAN 10) where I need to make ports:
1-10 as isolated (can't contact each other) 11-20 as community (need to contact each other like a normal VLAN) 23 as promiscuous (server that ports 1-20 need to get to) 24 as promiscuous (WAN router where ports 1-20 need to get to and the remote servers).
Topology: 3560 <-access-mode-link-> ASA5510 - Internet,3560 has 3 VLANs and 3 corresponding SVIs (default-gateways for VLANs),Just configured RAS VPN on ASA5510 and successfully made connection,Now, from RAS VPN (IPSEC) client workstation CLI, can ping all 3560 SVIs,CANNOT PING host devices plugged into switchports.
-VLAN 20 and VLAN 30 i configured. -VLAN 20 interface IP : 192.168.20.1/24 -VLAN 30 interface IP : 192.168.30.1/24.
Inter-vlan communication is happening fine. For testing for purpose i configured extended ACLs.i want stop communication from VLAN 30 to VLAN 20 but not vice-versa. If i ping from one of the IP VLAN 20 to one of the ip of VLAN 30, i was gettng Requested time out. And if i ping from one of the IP VLAN 20 to VLAN 30 interface IP, i was able get pinging.From VLAN 30 to VLAN 20, i was getting destination host unreachable from VLAN 30 ip( Its fine as its my requirement)So, solution needed to communicate from VLAN 20 to VLAN 30.
Probably an easy fix but something's weird in my config. I am setting up a new network, so this is not production, Routed environment, down to the access layer using 3560-x l3 switches.
vlan 10: data vlan 20: wifi vlan 30: wifi guests vlan 40: voip
My objective is to allow all traffic OUTBOUND to certain subnets (10.10.0.0/24, 10.10.100.0/24, 10.10.110.0/24 10.10.120.0/24) and block any other 10.0.0.0/8 networks. By doing it this way, after blocking all other internal traffic, I allow everything else to ensure internet traffic can go out.
Extended IP access list VLAN10_TRAFFIC_FLOW 10 permit ip any 10.10.0.0 0.0.0.255 20 permit ip any 10.10.100.0 0.0.0.255 30 permit ip any 10.10.110.0 0.0.0.255 40 permit ip any 10.10.120.0 0.0.0.255 50 deny ip any 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 (5 matches) 60 deny ip any 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 70 permit ip any any!interface Vlan10description DATAip address 10.104.10.1 255.255.255.0ip access-group VLAN10_TRAFFIC_FLOW outendThe problem is, from the above info, when I ping 10.10.0.5 from a workstation in VLAN 10, it should match rule 10, but instead if matches rule 50 (as shown by the 5 matches)
We have over 30 Cisco 3560 switches and over 10 VLANs on our network. In our example, VLAN 10 on switch IP 10.0.20.150 works fine and VLAN 10 on switch IP 10.0.20.24 doesn’t work. The below are both switches show vlan. url....I can’t tell what causes the problem and how to fix it. VLAN 10 on Switch 10.0.20 24 doesn’t work. [code]
I have enabled IP DHCP snooping on a 24 port 3560 switch (v small office) and let the database fill up, now I have added dynamic arp inspection on the single vlan and I amd getting these errors.
