Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 Multiple Vlan Access To Port Connecting Phone System
Oct 25, 2012
I'm new to networking and was looking for some assistance. First off im using packet tracer to diagram my senario as I will be receiving my equipment next week to deploy.
Hardware to be used:
1. 2 catalyst 3560 switches
2. all connect to a sonic wall router
I have two companies that work in the same office space. I need to keep these companies seperate on their own vlan. They will however need to share the phone system.(Packet tracer file uploaded to give those who have the time to see what I put together.) [code]
I have a multiple Offices in my location , all my external users are connecting my site using Cisco Client to site VPN and accessing my 2 sites , All users are able to access my 2nd office servers which are in 10.10.0.x pool , I have a different vlan in that same location with 10.10.35.x series and users are not able to access this pool servers , I am not much familiar with Routing . i am using ASA 5520 firewall .
We have 7 3560's in 7 different locations connected to our providor for wan access. Our provider has given us a copper cable at each point and we have connected it directly to our 3560 switch at each location. Each port is configured the same way at each location. Each switch is running eigrp.All of the switch ports on each switch are configured as a trunk and vlan 299 had the ip address for the eigrp connection: [code] This setup is working as each switch see's all of the other switches as an eigrp neighbor. We have also made sure that the switch at our head office has spanning tree priority for vlan 299.
So the problem is, if there is a change in the topology at one of the locations it usually causes one or more of the other connections to go down for some reason. We just cannot pinpoint what is causing this change. There are no log's or anything other than an eigrp hold time expired message.?
I have a 3560 switch with the following ports config [code] I would like to use theses ports on a different vlan to connect 4 pc's to them. Can I just remove them from the vlan, remove the trunk switchport and set up on the vlan i want them on with no trunking?
For many years we've had the following vlan and port security config on our 3560s: [code] This has worked great on 12.2(37)SE1, 12.2(40)SE and 12.2(46)SE. However since 12.2(50)SE, and I've tried all the versions since then, we have a problem with 7900 phones and ATA186s taking upwards of 20 minutes before they can get a valid IP number.The problem on the newer IOSes seems to be related to the inactivity aging.On the older IOS versions the mac address of the voice device appears on the voice vlan straight away.
On the newer IOS versions the mac address of the voice device appears on the DATA vlan and seems to be stuck there until the inactivity aging removes it. It then gets re-learned, sometimes on the voice vlan, and sometimes on the data vlan. If you're unlucky and it gets re-learned on the data vlan you've got to wait until the inactivity time ages the address out again. Repeat until the mac address eventually gets learned on the voice vlan. I don't want to be stuck on 12.2(46)SE forever.
Any way to test in a lab what would happen if a tech mistakingly added "switchport voice vlan XX" to a trunk port? I am try to do some RCA on an issue and this has been identified as a possible cause by one of my techs.
The config is Switch1------Switch2--------Switch3 Each interswitch connection is configured as a dot1q trunk with all vlans allowed. The link between switch2 and 3 is where switchport voice vlan 10 was added. Switch1 is a 3750 and 2/3 are 3560's.
In one location we have a HP 2510-48 port switch which we need to connect to a Cisco 3560 switch. The problem I have is that we have issues connecting fibre to the HP switch, so I have decided to attached a CAT 5 to Fibre convertor at this end and another to the cisco switch.
My question you can not connect a HP switch to a Cisco switch, is this true or do I just need to confirgure something on the ports.
We're going to be switching some of our gear from Foundry to Cisco, and were looking at the WS-C2960S-48TS-L. We currently have 3 different VLAN's, and I wanted to have 1 uplink back to our firewall (ASA 5550) and then let the firewall do the routing between the subnets. I realize that 1 link will carry the traffic twice then, but is that possibly with those switches to have all three vlans assigned to one port and then just let the firewall do the routing between the vlans or would I need to have 3 uplink ports back to the 5550?
The field engineer has a stand alone 24 port 2900 series switch that he has different equipment connected to and are segmented using VLANs. So for example, he's got ports 1-4 assigned to VLAN 10, 5-12 assigned to VLAN 20, 13-19 assigned to VLAN 30 and 20-24 assigned to VLAN 40. He would like all the gear on VLAN 30 to have the ablity to talk to all of the other VLANS, but VLAN 40 should not be allowed to talk with any other VLAN. Trunking would do no good here since the switch isn't connected to anything and you can only assign one VLAN per port.
Is there a way to do this within the stand alone switch? The only possible way I could think of would be to ensure that each VLAN has an assigned IP number (subnet) and doing this through access lists.
Im trying to access the switch to reset the password to factory defaults (please see switch output Astrix has removed customer identifying information for security purposes.) Each time I reboot the switch and try and access the password recover mode this same output below starts and im still not able to access the recovery area of the switch
cisco WS-C3560G-48PS (PowerPC405) processor (revision F0) with 122880K/8184K bytes of memory. Processor board ID FOC1133Y28Q
Between our hosting and a customer we have an extended vlan, traveling on a fiber, between two cisco 3560 switches.The thing is, that we want to create one or more vlans inside that extended vlan, in some way if possible?
Does a portable RPS device either from Cisco or another manufacturer exists, that would allow you to move primary power for a switch without causing an outage? I realize that for the Catalyst 3560 for example, you can get an RPS 2300 or 675, but my understanding is that these are made for a more permanent installation, not to mention rather costly.
It looks like the RPS 675 is rather inexpensive after all, especially in the secondary market, but still rather large for toting around.
We just installed a hosted VOIP system using Cisco 7900 series IP phones. We are having a strange issue with a few computers where they pull DHCP information from our VOIP provider's DHCP server on the Internet and not our LAN DHCP server.
The switchports areconfigured as: switchport mode access
My rationale behind this is that the phones would use CDP to get their VLAN info from the providers Cisco router and the PCs would just ride on the default VLAN. But this is not the case. Computers randomly keep getting DHCP info from the provider's router. Do I have to use voice vlan x and make the switchports trunks?
I have CME on Router 2800 series, and switch 2960 PoE connected to this router.On 2960 switch, there is existing 7945 IP Phone that already work properly and get IP 14.x.x.x from voice vlan 2.
Problem is when I add cisco 6921 IP Phone connect to 2960 switch, it get data vlan 10.x.x.x, not voice Vlan 14.x.x.x I have check CDP and it use CDP v2
Config on 2960:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/34 <--- this is connected to IP Phone 7945 switchport mode access switchport voice vlan 2 spanning-tree portfast
[code]....
With same config and condition on port 2960, why the IP Phone 6921 can't get voice vlan 14.x.x.x, whereas IP Phone 7945 can get voice vlan 14.x.x.x
Is there any way to check if this VLAN is used by somedevice?
Cisco3560#sh ip int b Vlan55 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down
Cisco3560#sh vlan VLAN Name Status Ports ---- -------------------------------- --------- ------------------------------- 1 default active 55 Print active Fa0/5, Fa0/6, Fa0/7, Fa0/8
I have 4 vlan and all has conectivity/access with all (VLAN10,VLAN20,VLAN30 and VLAN40, I use a 3560 Switch for this propose, I need to modificate one vlan (VLAN40) that has access to the rest of the VLAN's BUT the rest of the VLAN's dont have access to VLAN40. I know that it is a problem of access-list BUT I can't undertand how to obtain the result that I like
I have 2 locations, at a distance of 600KM.These two locations are well connected by Point to Point L2 VLAN with a speed of 2 MBPS and supported by CISCO 3560G switches.Location A has a VLAN to communicate to the other VLAN at Location B. Location B has also got 3 VLANS which are inter connected with Location A.Now the hardware in one of VLANs in Location B has moved to Location A for obvious reasons.
For further refernce am giving the VLAN IP address here....
Location A VLAN1 for communicatng to Location B IP Range 172.20.44.210 Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway 172.20.44.210 VLAN2 for the desktops in Location A IP Range 192.193.194.1-255 Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway 192.193.194.1
I am a fairly basic configs that I just can’t figure out what I am doing wrong. I have what I would consider a fairly basic config that I just can’t seem to get to work and I am sure it is something I am just not doing or grasping. Basically I have two 3560 switches that I would like to connect together with four 1Gb ports and trunk four vlans across said port-channel, I created the port-channel and set it to switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q I then set all four ports to channel-group # mode on. With that setup I can’t ping from switch to switch on the nonnative vlan.
For some special arrangement, I would like to connect 2 access ports from a 3550 switch to 3560 switch.1 port for vlan 200, another port for vlan 201.Will this introduce bad thing to the switches?
I have an environment of 3 X 3560G of which I have 1st switch-CORE(f0/10) connecting to the VPN router(CE) interface-f0/0. Remaining 2 Cisco 3560's(Access) are connected to Gi0/1 and Gi0/2 on the 1st switch-CORE via gi0/1 . On all three switches I have created multiple VLANs and assigned ports to these VLAN. The switch to switch connection is trunk allowing all VLANs created on all these 3 switches. Now the issue is how I am going to have all these VLANs routed through single interface on the routeri-e f0/0, as all these subnets will communicating to remote site over VPN. What should be default gateway on the 2 Access switches and the CORE switch, also what static route should be on router to reach all subnets(VLANs) created on these 3 switches.
I have read inter-VLAN routing i-e creating sub interfaces on router but dont want to proceed with that and looking for any other way to have my VLANs talk on all three switches and then are accessible to remote site ove VPN?
We recently purchased Cisco 3560X Layer3 Switch. We need to perform simple Inter VLAN routing. We have configured VLAN1 (name-server_vlan) and VLAN2 (name- user_vlan). We have also assigned the Ports and IP address to both the VLANs. After assiging this if we plug Laptop A into VLAN1 then it doesnt communicates with Laptop B (btw, Laptop A is able to Ping VLAN2 Gateway ) in VLAN2 but on the other hand Laptop B is able to communicate with Laptop A and ping everything i.e. Gateway of VLAN1.
I have a 3560 switch with 1 VLAN (VLAN 10) where I need to make ports:
1-10 as isolated (can't contact each other) 11-20 as community (need to contact each other like a normal VLAN) 23 as promiscuous (server that ports 1-20 need to get to) 24 as promiscuous (WAN router where ports 1-20 need to get to and the remote servers).
Topology: 3560 <-access-mode-link-> ASA5510 - Internet,3560 has 3 VLANs and 3 corresponding SVIs (default-gateways for VLANs),Just configured RAS VPN on ASA5510 and successfully made connection,Now, from RAS VPN (IPSEC) client workstation CLI, can ping all 3560 SVIs,CANNOT PING host devices plugged into switchports.
-VLAN 20 and VLAN 30 i configured. -VLAN 20 interface IP : 192.168.20.1/24 -VLAN 30 interface IP : 192.168.30.1/24.
Inter-vlan communication is happening fine. For testing for purpose i configured extended ACLs.i want stop communication from VLAN 30 to VLAN 20 but not vice-versa. If i ping from one of the IP VLAN 20 to one of the ip of VLAN 30, i was gettng Requested time out. And if i ping from one of the IP VLAN 20 to VLAN 30 interface IP, i was able get pinging.From VLAN 30 to VLAN 20, i was getting destination host unreachable from VLAN 30 ip( Its fine as its my requirement)So, solution needed to communicate from VLAN 20 to VLAN 30.
Probably an easy fix but something's weird in my config. I am setting up a new network, so this is not production, Routed environment, down to the access layer using 3560-x l3 switches.
vlan 10: data vlan 20: wifi vlan 30: wifi guests vlan 40: voip
My objective is to allow all traffic OUTBOUND to certain subnets (10.10.0.0/24, 10.10.100.0/24, 10.10.110.0/24 10.10.120.0/24) and block any other 10.0.0.0/8 networks. By doing it this way, after blocking all other internal traffic, I allow everything else to ensure internet traffic can go out.
Extended IP access list VLAN10_TRAFFIC_FLOW 10 permit ip any 10.10.0.0 0.0.0.255 20 permit ip any 10.10.100.0 0.0.0.255 30 permit ip any 10.10.110.0 0.0.0.255 40 permit ip any 10.10.120.0 0.0.0.255 50 deny ip any 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 (5 matches) 60 deny ip any 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 70 permit ip any any!interface Vlan10description DATAip address 10.104.10.1 255.255.255.0ip access-group VLAN10_TRAFFIC_FLOW outendThe problem is, from the above info, when I ping 10.10.0.5 from a workstation in VLAN 10, it should match rule 10, but instead if matches rule 50 (as shown by the 5 matches)
We have a customer that is relocating thier headquarters. They have a temporary requirement to bridge multiple vlans or a router T3 link to the new location as they cannot change the IP subnets. Setup is 3560 switch connecting to a 3845 then T3 to remote 3845 and 3560. I need to bridge multiple VLANs. I have seen a good example on how to do it over sonet but I don't see how to translate that to an HDLC or Frame Relay encapsulation for the T3 Link.
