Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 - System Returned To ROM By Address Error At PC 0x0
Jun 7, 2012We have observed that one of the 3560 switch was rebooted with "System returned to ROM by address error at PC 0x0, address 0x0"
View 1 RepliesWe have observed that one of the 3560 switch was rebooted with "System returned to ROM by address error at PC 0x0, address 0x0"
View 1 RepliesMy switch is getting restarted and the error shown is : System returned to ROM by error - Debug Exception (Could be NULL pointer dereference)
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have my router 7606-S rebooted by itself. According to output of show version command it's rebooted by software bug.
================ Snipped from crashinfo file =================
Jan 14 05:33:50.822 GMT+7: %C7600_MEM_ECC-2-MBE: Multiple bit error detected at 0xC09F4D38
Jan 14 05:33:50.822 GMT+7: %C7600_MEM_ECC-3-SYNDROME_MBE: 8-bit Syndrome for the detected Multi-bit error: 0x0
05:33:50 GMT+7 Sat Jan 14 2012: Unexpected exception to CPU: vector 1500, PC = 0xB7922BC , LR = 0xB792250
==================== Show Version ======================
Cisco IOS Software, c7600rsp72043_rp Software (c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.1(1)S1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: [URL]
Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Thu 10-Feb-11 19:27 by prod_rel_team
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(33r)SRD5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
BOOTLDR: Cisco IOS Software, c7600rsp72043_rp Software (c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.1(1)S1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
[Code]...
I have an 3845 router:Cisco IOS Software, 3800 Software (C3845-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(11)XJ4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)After an unexpected reboot it says: System returned to ROM by bus error at PC 0x6323F398, address 0xB0D0B39 at 12:35:09 GMT Fri Jan 27 2012..To troubleshoot this error I need to find out what kind of processor this router has. It doesnt fall in either of the categories descibed in url...
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have problem with the WAN Router 7206. It has been reloaded automatically 2 times since yesterday. [code] I have already put this message to the output interpreter and the solution is upgrading to the latest IOS. But, when I search in the Bug Toolkit about SegV problem, this bug status is still "Open". So, how can I upgrade to the latest IOS if the status of this bug is still open?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhen i was changing the class-maps i get lost the router. I have attached the crash log file, am i hitting a bug here? I have many times modified the class-maps on the go without any issues.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a router cisco 3825, It is being restarted autometically. and gives a message "System returned to ROM by bus error at PC 0x6125DCFC, address 0x15A3C78B" in show ver.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI noticed that my router 7200 was reboot for a bus error. The error occurred while the system was operational. After the restart the router works properly for more than 6 days.
This is the sh ver:
Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200P-IPBASEK9-M), Version 15.0(1)M4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: [URL]
Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Thu 28-Oct-10 22:57 by prod_rel_team
[code].....
Seems that the error "System returned to ROM by bus error at PC 0x2E0BF30, address 0x0" should be a special type of bus error crash is when the crash is caused by a corrupted program counter (PC). The PC value is the location of the instruction which the processor was executing when the bus error occured. In this case, the PC has jumped to the address 0x0 (probably because of a null pointer), but this is not where the instruction is located.
Can I consider this as a processor memory parity errors and wait for a second parity error before I replace anything?
Whenever I want to turn off the ip cache flow and enter command "no ip flow egress" on a router interface, the router will self reboot and returned with the error message - System returned to ROM by bus error at PC message in the show version ouput.
I tried on two different routers below here and both also undergoing a cold restart when I key in the command "no ip flow egress" on the said interface
1) Cisco 7206 running IOS 12.4(1c)
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
ip address 10.20.10.2 255.255.255.0
ip flow egress
duplex auto
speed auto
end
when I key in "no ip flow egress" under int gi0/1 and the router self restarted and return the message Router uptime is 3 minutes System returned to ROM by bus error at PC 0x606D48FC,address 0x0
2) Cisco 3845 running IOS 12.4(3e)
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
ip address 10.20.20.2 255.255.255.0
ip nbar protocol-discovery
ip flow egress
duplex auto
speed auto
end
when I key in "no ip flow egress" under int gi0/0 and the router self restarted and return the message
Router uptime is 3 minutes System returned to ROM by bus error at PC 0x6007EBE0, address 0x0
Does a portable RPS device either from Cisco or another manufacturer exists, that would allow you to move primary power for a switch without causing an outage? I realize that for the Catalyst 3560 for example, you can get an RPS 2300 or 675, but my understanding is that these are made for a more permanent installation, not to mention rather costly.
It looks like the RPS 675 is rather inexpensive after all, especially in the secondary market, but still rather large for toting around.
I'm new to networking and was looking for some assistance. First off im using packet tracer to diagram my senario as I will be receiving my equipment next week to deploy.
Hardware to be used:
1. 2 catalyst 3560 switches
2. all connect to a sonic wall router
I have two companies that work in the same office space. I need to keep these companies seperate on their own vlan. They will however need to share the phone system.(Packet tracer file uploaded to give those who have the time to see what I put together.) [code]
I have port on cisco 3560 goes to error-disable,what is the cause of this issue,pls be noted this interface has BPDU Guard enable
View 3 Replies View Related have problem with switch. 3560, Some of gi ports have outdiscards errors and switching is very slow.
ServerSwitch>show int counters errors
Port Align-Err FCS-Err Xmit-Err Rcv-Err UnderSize OutDiscards
Gi0/1 0 0 0 0 0 8722
Gi0/2 0 0 0 0 0 157
Gi0/3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi0/4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi0/5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi0/6 0 0 0 0 0 446
Gi0/7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi0/8 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi0/9 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi0/10 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi0/11 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi0/12 0 0 0 0 0 1705658
Gi0/13 0 0 0 0 0 9
Gi0/14 0 0 0 0 0 74
Gi0/15 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi0/16 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi0/17 0 0 0 0 0 9
Gi0/18 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi0/19 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi0/20 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi0/21 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi0/22 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gi0/23 0 0 0 0 0 922
Gi0/24 0 0 0 0 0 0
But in monitoring i see only 80 Mbit max bandwith utilization on gigabit links.
We have ip arp inspection and dhcp snooping enable in couple of 3750 and 3560 switches. Everything works fine, excepted few case that DAI packet rate trigger and errdisable the port. Later on we found out that most of computer that trigger DAI is Windows 7 and especially when they are in sleep mode. Not sure if anyone experiencing it with Windows 7. Also we have it rate limit at 64.
View 2 Replies View Relatedi'm using some catalysts 3560 with 10 VLANs and inter vlan routing. we use a windows deployment services server to install our workstations. the pxe boot works fine. the image is loading, and when the windows 7 PE is booting, the dhcp request failes. when i use a small not manageable switch between the computers and the catalysts, it works fine.all other things work fine.
View 9 Replies View RelatedProblem is that at some C65K I have directly connected Unix servers and the don't show MAC address at port, and same has happened at 3560 switched where I have too Unix based equipments connected. When use show mac-address interface XXXX, nothis appears at port and tested them with other equipments that worked fine.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a server connected to a 3560 switch which in turn connects to 6500s. The gateway interface is on the 6500. We will be changing the 6500s so the mac address for the gateway will change, however the IP address will remain the same. As we change out the 6500s the uplink connections to the 3560 will go down. This will flush the old mac address from the 3560.When the 3560 removes a MAC address does it update servers so they have to relearn the correct MAC address?
View 4 Replies View Relatedwe have a 3560 switch configured with EIGRP with dhcp. We have a user that we cannot ping, however the interface show up / up and no errors on interface. the ip address is 10.2.0.199 - however we have dhcp configured to exclude the range from dhcp ip dhcp excluded-address 10.22.0.1 10.22.0.200 how can this work station get a dhcp address if we have that ip range excluded from the dhcp pool?
The user is off a different switch that is a uplink to this distribution switch. Traceroutes shows that the problem is with the distribution switch.
I have Cisco 3560x layer 3, but there is one problem with MAC ACL. Here is sample scenario:
I have two V LANS 2 & 3. There is one device (D1) on V LAN 2 and three (D2,D3,D4) devices on V LAN 3. D1 can talk only to D2 and D3. D4 can talk only to D2 and D3. D1 and D4 cannot talk at all. I got the IP access list all set, but I was asked to get the MAC ACL on it. The problem is that as soon as packet is routed, its MAC addresses will change, correct? Is there way of preventing device with same IP but different MAC from talking to device it should not to, keeping in mind that the packet will be routed?
I've set up my 3560 to do routing. Now, I'm looking for a way to apply acl restrictions to the vlan interface ip address itself.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have some Ethernet-connected cameras that all have the same Ethernet MAC address FF:FF:FF:0A:0A:0A. They were originally designed to directly connect to a Windows PC, but they can also connect through a simple unmanaged switch.A Catalyst 3560 switch won't forward packets to or from anything with that MAC address, at least not by default. Is there a way to convince the switch to do so?
It was my hope to replace the dedicated connections we have for these cameras with a separate VLAN for each camera, and switch them through our existing switch network. Given that all of the cameras use the same MAC address, putting them on the same network is out of the question, but different VLANs, where the only two devices on each VLAN were the camera and the PC that uses it, would be fine.
The switches run IOS 12.2(55) SE through SE3. I learned the camera MAC address from the PC's ARP table while the camera software runs; it turns out the cameras don't have a full IP stack either and don't even do ICMP.
I have 2 3560 switches that are running 12.2(25)SEE2. Port security is enabled on some of the ports. Whenever there is a power failure, when power is restored, 1 port on each switch goes to err-disabled. The mac address that causes this is a valid address for that port. Below is the configuration on one of the ports.
View 1 Replies View RelatedMy actual Scenario
1 x 4500 and 1 x 3560?They are gateways of 8 Vlans?They are doing HSRP in each of those Vlans?The 4500 is the Active?There is a DHCP Pool for each of those Vlans on both gateways using "ip dhcp excluded-address" I ensured that the range of provided ips by each DHCP server will not be overlapped Obs.: Reducing the lease time, I ended with the calls bringing related problems.
OK, every thing is blue, every thing is fine.But the network diagram is realy complex(41 switchs, 89 uplinks), and depending of how is the network flow, one or other server answer first or latter.
For many reasons I would like that the secondary DHCP server would answer only if the primary DHCP server goes down.To me, the bigger reason is that DHCP database would be only in one DHCP server.But there is other reasons.
I passed by many frustrated solutions:Try to force a delay on the answer on one of the servers. - Impossible.Try to disable DHCP server, and, using EEM, enable it only if router became active in HSRP. - I couldn't do It.
What I'm thinking now is use the HSRP resource to resolve it.On both routers I would put a "ip helper-address" pointing to an Virtual_HSRP_IP.And depending on which router is the active, him will answer the request.
My first doubt is:Would it work?The second doubt is:Could I use the same Virtual_HSRP_IP that exists on that Vlan(see example 1),or I would need to point it to a Virtual_HSRP_IP in a different Vlan(see example 2)?
Example 1
-----------------------------------
| 4500 |
-----------------------------------
interface Vlan1
ip address 10.10.0.2 255.255.0.0
ip helper-address 10.10.0.1
standby 1 ip 10.10.0.1
[code]....
what does this log message mean? (RV120W fw 1.0.3.10)
2012-05-14 19:59:26 warning HERMES kern KERNEL [Kernel] ERROR:endChantRecv: protocol PNAC returned !OK
2012-05-14 19:59:26 warning HERMES kern KERNEL [Kernel] ERROR:endChantRecv: protocol PNAC returned !OK
2012-05-14 19:59:26 warning HERMES kern KERNEL [Kernel] ERROR:endChantRecv: protocol PNAC returned !OK
2012-05-14 19:59:26 warning HERMES kern KERNEL [Kernel] ERROR:endChantRecv: protocol PNAC returned !OK
2012-05-14 19:18:46 warning HERMES kern KERNEL [Kernel] ERROR:endChantRecv: protocol PNAC returned !OK
2012-05-14 19:18:46 warning HERMES kern KERNEL [Kernel] ERROR:endChantRecv: protocol PNAC returned !OK
2012-05-14 19:13:36 warning HERMES kern KERNEL [Kernel] ERROR:endChantRecv: protocol PNAC returned !OK
[code]....
I got this error this operation returned because the timeout period expired error code 0x000005b4
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am receiving this error after connecting a copper adapter on a GBIC blade in a 6509. Here are the results from the show Interface. I am waiting to confirm the device on the other side settings but as far as I see I get UP and Up for protocol and line respectively.
GigabitEthernet2/11 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is C6k 1000Mb 802.3, address is 0009.11e4.f3ce (bia 0009.11e4.f3ce)
Description: RCPBSDEV
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
[code]....
I've run in to this on 3750G's in a various sized stacks. We apply port security for a mac address on a single port (not existing on more than one port - that's a different issue that appears in multiple posts already).In this case:
1) We do a 'sho mac address-table and see that the device with the mac address in question lives on one port, port 1/0/x.
2) We apply mac port security for this exact same mac address to the same port it is already attached to. switch(config)#int g2/0/2 switch(config-if)#switchport port-security mac-address 001a.1ec8.abcd
3) Get this error: 'Found duplicate mac-address 001a.1ec8.abcd'.We again confirm that that is the only port on the entire switch that has this mac-address.Try the command again, same error.
4) We do a bunch of show commands, get in and out of the switch, go back and then try it again, and now it works, same command, same port and same mac address.
-Aging is default 300
-These are Cisco wireless AP's attached to the switch
-This occurs on different switches with different ports using different mac addresses, always same symptoms.
The router 1841 is connected directly to the layer switch. the network diagram is below:
Office A --> Switch (L3) --> Router 1841 --> Internet --> Office B
However, when I transfer the file from Office A to office B, the speed very slow ( only around 40 kb/second), and there are an input error and CRC error:
Cisco-R1841#sh interfaces FA0/1
FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Gt96k FE, address is 0019.e02f.03dd (bia 0019.e02f.03dd)
[Code]......
I would like to know if Catalyst WS-C3750G-48TS-E recognizes and understand Cisco VSS ( Virtual Switching System) . Is there a List available which tells us which Old Catalyst Switches or current switches understand Cisco VSS?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco 3560 does not support "set ip next-hop verify-availabilty". I need this command in my config. "set ip next-hop" do not do the same job.
View 8 Replies View RelatedThe last few days I've been exploring options in getting rid of some old routers accross a wan connections. I have a cat 3560 to play with and I thought I would try and use the no switchport command test out routing with switch. I've got some type of route issue and I tried a few things which I thought would fix the issue but had no effect. I'll post the config and a few commands so you can see what the basic setup is.
Here we can see in the arp that it knows about both 10.7.1.2 (PC unable to ping 10.3.3.254) as well as 10.3.3.254 (ASA).I tried adding in a ip route of 10.7.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.3.3.110 as well as 10.3.3.254. Neither produced the results I wanted allowing 10.7.1.2 (PC) to ping the ASA (10.3.3.254). [code]
I have an environment of 3 X 3560G of which I have 1st switch-CORE(f0/10) connecting to the VPN router(CE) interface-f0/0. Remaining 2 Cisco 3560's(Access) are connected to Gi0/1 and Gi0/2 on the 1st switch-CORE via gi0/1 . On all three switches I have created multiple VLANs and assigned ports to these VLAN. The switch to switch connection is trunk allowing all VLANs created on all these 3 switches. Now the issue is how I am going to have all these VLANs routed through single interface on the routeri-e f0/0, as all these subnets will communicating to remote site over VPN. What should be default gateway on the 2 Access switches and the CORE switch, also what static route should be on router to reach all subnets(VLANs) created on these 3 switches.
I have read inter-VLAN routing i-e creating sub interfaces on router but dont want to proceed with that and looking for any other way to have my VLANs talk on all three switches and then are accessible to remote site ove VPN?
I have tried to make policy based routing on Cisco 3560. I use ipservices ios (SW version 12.2.(50)SE3 and SW-IMAGE C3560-IPSERVICESK9-M) For below configuration there is no problem and pbr is working.
“Access-list 100 permit ip host 1.1.1.1 host 2.2.2.2
Access-list 101 permit ip host 1.1.1.1 host 3.3.3.3
Route-map pbr1 permit 10
Match ip address 100
Set ip next-hop verify-availability 1.1.1.2 1 track 11
interface fasthethernet 0/1
ip policy route-map pbr1”
But when i add another sequence to the "pbr1" with another sequence number like that.
“Route-map pbr1 permit 11
Match ip address 101
Set ip next-hop verify-availability 1.1.1.3 1 track 12”
pbr is not working. Switch gives message "PLATFORM_PBR-3-UNSUPPORTTED_RMP:Route-map pbr1 not supported for Policy Based Routing”"ip policy route-map pbr1" command not shown in the running config. And "show ip policy" output is blank.Configuration guide says you have insert many sequence to the route-map with the same name. And also this command is not in the unsupported command list.