Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560G Input And Crc Errors Only On Built In Ports?
Mar 11, 2013
I have an odd situation where I cannot get a device connected to a built in switchport with out input and crc errors. When connecting to a GLC-T sfp it works fine.Here is my test layout
Outdoor wireless AP --- 10' of cat6 cable --- Gigabit POE injector --- 10' Cat6 cable --- 3560G port 48. (input and crc errors)
When I do this there are input and crc errors on the switch port. This has been confirmed on three different switches and three different outdoor AP's. We though at first it was the injector, but when we run the same setup, but instead connect the device to port 49 with a GLC-T sfp there are no errors.
Outdoor wireless AP --- 10' of cat6 cable --- Gigabit POE injector --- 10' Cat6 cable --- 3560G port 49 (GLC-T). (No errors)
I have upgraded the 3560G to the latest ios and still it has the same problem. If I run the same setup to a 2960 there are no errors at all.
Outdoor wireless AP --- 10' of cat6 cable --- Gigabit POE injector --- 10' Cat6 cable --- 2960 port g0/1 (No errors)
I have also tried manually setting the speed on the 3560G with no success.
View 9 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 16, 2013
We are facing since one month in our two Cisco WS-C3750G-12S on many interfaces input errors when data transer or ping (ICMP) increase input erros. Not only port 1 but many interface has same issue, i have change new IOS but still same issue, once i have erase startup config but same issue we are facing and finaly i have replace same new switch with the same IOS it's working fine.(c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE4.bin) [code]
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jul 1, 2012
I am not sure why the CRC and input errors are increasing in fastethernet port...This port is used as Intradomain cross connect to Data Center service provider for LAN extension between two Data Centers in different locations... The link is 100 MB. The switch port is directly connected to patch panel of DC provider and I believe they have some L3 switch or some other device that is providing LAN extension...
#sh interfaces fastEthernet 0/23
FastEthernet0/23 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0019.3050.1497 (bia 0019.3050.1497)
Description: ASA_VPN_TO
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
[code]....
View 26 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2012
I am not sure why the CRC and input errors are increasing in fastethernet port...This port is used as Intradomain cross connect to Data Center service provider for LAN extension between two Data Centers in different locations... The link is 100 MB. The switch port is directly connected to patch panel of DC provider and I believe they have some L3 switch or some other device that is providing LAN extension...
#sh interfaces fastEthernet 0/23
FastEthernet0/23 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0019.3050.1497 (bia 0019.3050.1497)
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2013
I have an ASR 1002x connected to a 6513. Connection is from ASR Gig Copper SFP to 6513 Copper 10/100/1000 port. The ASR is recevinig Runt and input errors. I have removed the negotiation auto command on both boxes and hard coded the speed etc and still errors occur. I have also added the negotiation auto to both devices and also removed it with out hard coding the speed at and same results. Everytime I have seen these errors is has been to collision caused by a duplex mismatch.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2010
I have two 3560G 24 port switches. Each of them connects to some 3560G or 2950 switches. Trunks between 3560G are set as 1000/full. Trunks between 3560G and 2950 are set as 100/full. show int status also shows the interface negotiation is 100/full for trunks between 3560G and 2950. The issue is I keep getting outdiscard errors in trunks between 3560G and 2950. At 2950 switches, I see Recv-errors too. I checked all the trunks traffic. They are totally not high. Only serveal mbps. Most time even lower than 1mbps.
I googled this kind of issue online. I see it could be possibly caused by high volume traffic higher than the capacity. But it appears the traffic there is not high enough to cause this kind of issue. Is there any possiblity that could cause this problem?
The below is 3560G trunk configuration for 2950 switch
interface GigabitEthernet0/10 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-122,124-4094 switchport mode trunk speed 100 duplex full srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 queue-set 2 priority-queue out mls qos trust cos auto qos voip trust
the trunk configuration at 2950 switch: interface FastEthernet0/24 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-122,124-4094 speed 100 duplex full
View 16 Replies
View Related
Oct 21, 2012
I have been making effort to solve frequent input errors of module interface(WS-X4548-GB-RJ45) in our Backbone Switch(Cat4506).Let me show you show interface information.Rx-No-pkt-buff value is increased continuously even though traffic rate of interfaces is lower than 20Mbps.We have two Backbone Switch which is operated by HA via HSRP.What bring buffer shortage to our network ? [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2012
I've a 7206VXR (NPE-G1) router. I would like to purchase a PA-GE port adaptor where I've to use a GBIC connector.
1. Is it possible to have a connection between PA-GE and a 3560G switch (4 SFP ports)? If yes, what type of cables & connectors are to be used?
2. Is there any GigabitEthernet port adaptors / modules for 7206vxr where I can connect RJ45 (cat 5) or SFP modules?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2011
we have several uplink ports on a verity of cisco switches connecting to the nexus 7000, recording CRC errors.most are trunked ports with the following configuration. [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2011
I use an 1841 router as an internet facing firewall with a 10MB MetroE connection. Lately users started reporting slow internet download speeds and web pages timing out. Bandwidth reports do not show the link as being saturated so I looked at the interfaces on the 1841. The interface connected to the provider shows OK as far as errors but the LAN side of the router shows steadily increasing input errors. It doesn't show any other errors, no CRC, frame, runts, giants or overruns, just generic input errors. What type of errors are those? Nothing is being logged on the console.
I moved the connection to another switch ports and the errors continue. I switched it down to 10MB and also changed the switch and the errors slow down but don't stop. Interestingly, the switch side never shows any errors. What can I do here? I guess it can be a bad interface but that is such a rare thing that I am hesitant to replace the router.
View 11 Replies
View Related
May 11, 2011
My router, a Cisco 7204 with NPE 300, is experiencing output drops and input errors on a fastethernet interface. I have a 100Mbps connection with less than 15Mbps utilization at peak times.
FastEthernet1/0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is DEC21140, address is 0014.a985.1a1c (bia 0014.a985.1a1c) Internet address is 38.102.66.134/30 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 3/255, rxload 1/255
[Code]....
View 17 Replies
View Related
Oct 21, 2012
I ran into a problem a few weeks ago and am still trying to figure out why either the 3560 switch or our Cacti syslog server did not alert us when one of our ports was experiencing heavy CRC and Input errors.
I had upgraded the IOS to 12.2(55)SE6 and rebooted the switch. About a week later, someone was troubleshooting why print jobs were having problems printing to a high speed printer. When I looked at the interface it showed a few thousand CRC and Input errors. I cleared the counters and had them print again and watched as the CRC and Input errors went up. When I did a "show log" there were no error messages. Looking at our Cacti Syslog there were also no errors present for the past 6 months.
We found that the device on the port was set to auto speed and duplex and the switch port was at 100/Full. Once we got them to match the problem was resolved, but we were left wondering why we never got any alerts.
We also have some 3548 and 3550 model switches that Cacti picks up %LINK-4-ERROR for any ports that show CRC and Input errors. I did some research and it appears that the 3560 switches do not have the LINK facility code. I believe it has been replaced with a PHY link code but I'm not sure. We do have some "%PHY-4-EXCESSIVE_ERRORS: Excessive FCS, data, or idle word errors found" but they are all for 3750 switches. I could not find any 3560 that had alerted for that error or the LINK error.
I also tripped port security on the 3560 switch just to make sure that it was reporting correctly to Cacti and that alert did show up.
My question is how do I get a 3560 switch to alert in the logging buffer for CRC/Input/FCS errors? Also, how I can generate CRC and Input errors on purpose for testing? I tried mismatching the speed/duplex/Auto and only got collissions, no CRC or Input errors.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2013
My Expertise with Cisco ASA is Very less. I have observed Input errors in a Couple of Interfaces in Cisco ASA 5540 Firewall. [code] I need to Clear the Input errors on this particular Interface.Will Clear interface GigabitEthernet 0/0 will work?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 5, 2011
I'm using a Cisco 1812 to route traffic from a small location with 10 users.. Users are complaning about packet loss, and programs with live database connection is freezing..On the router i've checked one of the Fastethernet interfaces, and I can see that the input errors are increasing constantly. [code]
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2009
Why packets overrun are incrementing on the ASA even when I've only 40Mbps of throughput traffic?All interface are 1000- Full Duplex, both on ASA and on Catalyst3750.I've test the ASA5540 generating GET HTTP, about 40Mbit of traffic.When I use one ingress interface and one egress interface, interface input overrun counter is zero.When I use the same traffic with 3 ingress interfaces(slot0) and 3 egress interfaces(slot1), interface input overrun counter increase(60k overrun in only 2 minutes).
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2012
I have this output from show interfaces command for the fastethernet interface on a 2811 router.
find the causes of the crc and the ignored input errors on the interface?
The interface configuration is:
interface FastEthernet0/0description VLANS_CHILE
no ip address
[Code]....
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 10, 2012
I have an issue with input errors, overruns, and input reset drops on the inside interface of an 5580-40 (v8.2.5: Transparent mode) The box is not stressed at all according to the 'show' commands in the Cisco troubleshooting performance document for PIX/ASA v8.2.5. Nothing stands out because is pretty much normal, nothing (processes, RAM, blocks, IO...) really being highly utilized. I have replaced the 10Gig card and that seemed to work because the rate of errors has gone down tremedously. The next step is to RMA the whole box.My question is what would be the cause of the inside interface to stop processing traffic (I say that because the syslog server stops receiving messages) for some periods of 30 seconds periodically throughout the day and clients lose their connections (ie Outlook, IBM Sametime, Oracle, MSSQL..etc). Can the issue be somewhere related to the overruns and input errors?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2012
I have the network described below, on which I am running PIM.
(network) ---- Embedded Linux Router --(vlan 5)-- CAT 3560G --(vlan 5)-- Cisco 1811 Router ---- Multicast Listener
The Linux Router and the 1811 have formed a PIM neighbor relationship. The multicast listener sends an IGMP Join and I can see the PIM join leave the 1811 router (via "debug ip pim"). Using tcpdump on my linux router I never see the Join come in, but I can see the PIM Hellos (which is why the neighbor relationship formed).
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2012
Since two weeks I have a problem with the VLANs who I started to configure. I hope together we find the way.I have 5 VLANS configured in a CISCO 3560G switch. In my windows server 2003 I configured DHCP scope for each VLAN.One of the requirement to connect vlans each other is to put the IP of each vlan as gateway in the clients.So, how can I do to access to internet?. The ip of my Firewall are in one of the VLAN´s.When the configuration of the LAN only had one DHCP scope the gateway was the ip of my firewall. But now i don´t know how to configure the DHCP server, or the firewall, or the switch, or all of them To get access to internet.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2013
I'm trying to set up per vlan routing on a 3560G switch but it's not performing as I would expect. I've got a server on the 109 vlan with a 10.1.9.100 address and a default gateway of 10.1.9.1 this address is an HSRP gateway and currently resides on 10.1.9.7. When I traceroute through to my user PC on the internal network it receives a response from 10.1.9.7 However, it is then denied by an ACL on the internal firewall which has been applied to interface Eth0/0. It should arrive at the firewall on Eth0/2.109 as it has the 10.1.9.4 address.
My goal here is to route traffic on the 101 vlan to a seperate interface on the internal firewall from 109 vlan traffic. I'm either doing something wrong or these routing commands aren't designed to work in the way I'm expecting (I couldn't find any documentation on the ip route command where it is followed by different gateways for different vlans)
interface GigabitEthernet0/12
description Internal-FW Eth0/2
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 109
switchport mode trunk(Code )
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2012
I have a 3560G switch with c3560-advipservicesk9-mz.122-46.SE and 2 routers. The switch has vlans defined. I want to route all traffic on vlan 25 out of one of the routers exclusively. Here is what I have attempted:
-Set the SDM template to routing & reload
-Define an access-list for the v lan traffic
-Define the route-map
-Apply the route-map to the vlan interface
When I attempt the last step I receive the following syslog error:
%PLATFORM_PBR-3-UNSUPPORTED_RMAP: Route-map RM_IMDGuest not supported for Policy-Based Routing
Also, the route-map is removed from the vlan interface after this error is thrown. Im 99% confident that PBR is supported on this switch (am I wrong?). Here is the relevant show output:...
access-list 125 permit ip 192.168.25.0 0.0.0.255 any
route-map RM_IMDGuest permit 10
match ip address 125
set ip next-hop 192.168.5.3
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 4, 2013
I have two 3560G 24p switches, connected to each other via two links in Etherchannel. From one of the switches i retrieve SNMP info about port status and traffic for these two ports. That works great, until i pull out random cable. The switch responds with ifOperStatus = 2 and traffic drops to zero for that partikular port, as it should. But a some of seconds later it stops responding to my snmp reguests for ~ 5 seconds. That causes problems as my watchdog sets an alarm as it thinks the connection to the switch has been lost. (It checks switch uptime is increasing all the time)
If I set a delay on the watchdog on my monitoring system of 15sec, it works. But it ain't that nice to have a delay of 15 sec if the connection really is lost.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2013
I have a Cisco 1801W router, running a DSL connection with wireless connectivity for a school. This is configured on the fastEthernet0 interface on the 192.168.1.0 network (the router is 192.168.1.1).
I was wondering if it is possible to get the built-in switch (fastEthernet 1-8 interfaces) to be used as a part of the same network (192.168.1.0/24).
Fastethernet0 is connected to the school's main switch (24 port), but we could use a few more ports. I'd love to use the 8 ports on the router.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2013
I was assigned a task to connect two locations through a L2 VPN, The infrastructure which i have are...
Fortigate 80 C firewall at Location A
CISCO 3560G at Location A
CISCO 3750G at Location B
2 MBPS Leased Line connecting two locations.
T1 line at Location A.
The requirements are as follows..
Both locations should be in the same ip range (ex 10.80.71.1/24) Internet for Location B should be from Location A, both locations should talk to each other.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2012
We have 2 catalyst 3560g-48-PoE protected by a 1000Va 800Watt tripp-lite and I was cheking to see if that is really sufficient. Looking at the charts from Cisco suppport I would think I should have more, but have not had any issues with a few power outages
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2012
i facing problem with my switch cisco 3560G, when it power on only System light is green and noting happen. i check with serial cable ( Console) but noting happen no booting.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2013
I have 3560g with 15.0(2)SE2 version. I try to give different default gateways for different interfaces.I've already changed the sdm, run "ip routing" and made interest interfaces in "no switchport" with ip addresses.
my route-map is "
route-map ABC permit 10
set ip next-hop 192.168.77.3"
and it is applied on the interface with "ip policy route-map ABC" but when I try to apply it says "%PLATFORM_PBR-3-UNSUPPORTED_RMAP: Route-map ABC not supported for Policy-Based Routing" everything is fine if I change from "set ip default next-hop" to "set ip next-hop" but it is not I need in the guide of the version it is said this statement is not in unsupported list of route-map commands.[URL]
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2013
I have a WS-C3560G-24TS-S running 12.2(50)SE5 with IPBASE. I have been told that the functionality i seek (multicasting) is only available in the IPSERVICES version of the software. I was reading up on upgrading and saw that i needed to do a show license and get the UID and Serial number and get a license that is tied to my box. But the show license command doesnt work wtih my box. i then found something that said that the 3560's were special in that way. Im not sure how to get this box upgraded. I have a different 3560 running the IPSERVICES elsewhere in my organization. Can i take the IOS Version and update my switch to that?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2012
We currently have two 5548UP and two 2232PP switches running on 5.1(3)N2(1a) and the plan is to connect our old 3560G switches to 2232 PP using enhanced Vpc.
I enabled spanning tree bpdufilter on the 2232 PP ports so that we can connect switches to them but VTP is not working on those ports. Is there anything that needs to be done on the HIFs for VTP to work.Does VTP depends on BPDUs? Does enabling Bpdufilter affects VTP?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2012
We have a problem with the throughput over etherchannel in LACP with 2 or 4 ports. It is iSCSI traffic (vmware esxi 4.1 U3) is going from 2 separate NICs (ports) to the etherchannel (with 2 or 4 ports) that has a SAN connected (Nexenta).
The SAN is configured in passive LACP and the switch is in active LACP. Actually it does not matter if we do LACP or just MODE ON, still same result: ~1GBit/s throughtput in either direction. Like already mentioned, 2 or 4 ports in the etherchannel make no difference, or the configuration of the etherchannel.
I will post some config data below, but here is the question: Why can't we see traffic beyond 1GBit/s? Source and destination are capable of doing much more than that (vmware esxi RAID 5 of 1TB SATA; SAN 16 x 1TB NL-SAS). If we look with CNA, we can see that the traffic is balanced equally over the etherchannel ports. With or without QOS or flowcontrol, no difference. This whole traffic happenes on this switch.
!
port-channel load-balance src-dst-ip
!
interface Port-channel5
[Code]....
View 13 Replies
View Related
Feb 4, 2013
my 3750-E Core Stack is connected to the Provider Router and is the DG for the internal LAN. I saw that the CPU is very high also in the night, but I found not the problem. I use an SVI to connect the provider due to HA reasons. I sniffered the network but saw no ecessive broadcaststorms. There was a PBR configured but I deleted it wihtout any success..
switch Version
15.0(1)SE1
10#sh proc cpu so
[Code]......
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2013
We have a Catalyst 3560G 24 port POE switch. It's been running fine for 1+ years. A few weeks ago we enabled SPAN on it to capture packets. Today, we had a random spike in CPU on the switch. Seems hardware swithing continued to work fine, but software based processes choked and effectively took down EIGRP, HSRP, etc. We collect syslogs from the router and we saw 2 crashes/reboots. Both showed the exact same error both times, with the same hex values. I **believe** the CPU usage dropped when a tech disconneted the SPAN port and it's state changed to down, but I'm not 100% sure.Could this indicate an IOS bug (I'm hoping it's not a hardware failure)? And, how to track this down to see if this could be related to SPAN? I've disabled SPAN for now.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 19, 2012
We have recently started as Internet service provider in an open metropolitan.
We use a Cisco 3560G Layer 3 switch, where we have all our vlan where we have konfiguerat ex. Switch (config) # interface vlan 150, an interface for each VLAN capabilities such as int vlan 1 - 10/10 int vlan 2 to 30/10, int vlan 3 100/10 and so on.
Our int vlan is configured as follows:
dhcp relay information trusted
ip address <x.x.x.x> <x.x.x.x>
ip helper-address <x.x.x.x>
Ports (ex. int Gigabit Ethernet 0/1) are configured as follows:
description Uplink
switchport access vlan x
[Code].....
Now the problem; we have a customer in ex. vlan 3 who needs to access a server provided by another customer in the same vlan (vlan 3), and access to each other in the same vlan is not possible. You can access the server from any other vlan, but when it comes to access to another host in the same vlan, you will not reach it.
We suspect that the energy company has configured with pvlan isolated. If we use the command ip local-proxy-arp on each vlan, it works to reach each other, but it seems that our 3560 becomes overloaded when ip local-proxy-arp is enabled and it streaming and use IP telephony it doesn't work. The response time at ping is longer and the loss of packets increase with ip local-proxy-arp enabled. The other operators in the metropolitan also uses Cisco 3560G so the hardware should be sufficient.
We have also tried to add no split-horizon, but it made no difference. How do we get around this without negative consequences? Probably need something that makes you allow to send out the same interface that it came from, because it works as long as you are in another vlan.
View 1 Replies
View Related
