I have a Cisco 3750 with private VLANS configured.. VLAN 2 is the "primary", VLAN 3 is "isolated" and VLAN 4 is "community". This is all working correctly, however I now have the need to another VLAN called "production". I need the production VLAN to be able to reach all the private VLAN hosts (community and Isolated), and vice versa
View 2 RepliesI have defined a trunk between a nexus 5k and cat 3750 as a pvlan trunk - now I would like to add redundance and performance and tried to establish a vpc between my par of nexus's and the 3750 stack - but the nexus tell me that the port-channel doesn't support pvlan's - and then - ehh - do I get any benefits of running the trunk as a pvlan trunk at all?
interface Ethernet1/4
switchport mode trunk
speed 1000
switchport private-vlan trunk allowed vlan 550-552
switchport private-vlan mapping trunk 550 551-552
[code]...
Why I got below error message when config Private VLAN?
Error: while enabling/disabling service: private-vlan, err: Private-vlan is not allowed in F2 VDC (0x40e4005d)
We need to connect several DSLAMs on the 4900 switch, every DSLAM has 4 VLANs configured (VOIP service, MGMT, ADSL Private, ADSL Public), and sends the traffic for each service tagged with appropriate VLAN id according to the table:
VOIP: 608
MGMT: 594
ADSL PRIVATE: 2900
ADSL PUBLIC: 2930
On the DSLAM side it is very simple configuration, just a normal trunk with 4 VLANs transversing the link. On the 4900 I need to isolate the traffic for ADSL PRIVATE & PUBLIC service so DSLAMs connected to the same switch do not have L2 connectivity between them. For VOIP and MGMT they must communicate with each other. DSLAM acts also as a VOIP GW so it must communicate with other DSLAMs for VOIP service. Also VLAN 200 is configured on ME 4900 for switch management traffic.
This 4900 Switch connects to MPLS PE router, which offers L3 VPN service for VOIP & MGMT service, and L2 VPN for ADSL service (PPPoE traffic to BRAS). Fortunately we have ES+ linecard to support many ethernet features. I tried this config:
1) VOIP, DSLAM-MGMT, MPLS-MGMT configured as normal VLANs
2) ADSL PUBLIC & PRIVATE configured as isolated secondary VLANs, primary VLAN for ADSL PRIVATE is 2008, for PUBLIC 2308
3) Configure DSLAM facing ports on ME 4900 as private-vlan trunks
4) Configure ME 4900 uplink port to MPLS PE as a private-vlan promiscous trunk
5) Configure ethernet services on MPLS PE for each tag that comes from ME 4900 (ES+ cards are awesome, i love them:D )
6) Apply L3 VPN service for VOIP and DSLAM-MGMT, and L2 VPN for ADSL service.
But at least this last command should list on spanning tree forwarding state also the ADSL VLANs or not?
Here is the output of the show interface switchport.
I have 2960 cisco switch. I want to configure private vlan. But it is not getting configured in cisco 2960. Is there any other way to configure that in switch.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have the need for private vlans in isolated mode to backup some hosts on a secured network. We are using Cisco Nexus 5020 with the fex 2148 for copper-ports - and I tried to implement this setup: [code]
The Cisco Nexus 2000 Fabric Extender does not support PVLANs over VLAN trunks used to connect to another switch. The PVLAN trunks are only used on inter-switch links but the FEX ports are only meant to connect to servers. Since it is not a valid configuration to have an isolated secondary VLAN as part of a Fabric Extender port configured as a VLAN trunk, all frames on isolated secondary VLANs are pruned from going out to a FEX.
the "only" limitation should be the trunk option - but as far as I can see from the output from my nexus this is not correct .We are running NXOS: [code]
know if Private Vlans are supported on the Cisco 4900m switch when set in VTP version 3 and VTP disabled?Most documents just specify VTY transparent mode without mentioning the version, trying not to assume since this is production.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHaving problem pinging from Host A on ESX1 to Host B on ESX2. Each host are assigned the same port-profile. If I put 2 host's on the same ESX machine using the same port-profile, they are able to ping each other.
n1kv-vsm# sh port-profile name xxx-prod-40port-profile xxx-prod-40 description: type: vethernet status: enabled capability l3control: no pinning control-vlan: - pinning packet-vlan: - system vlans: 1 port-group: xxxl-prod-40 max ports: 32 inherit: config attributes: switchport mode private-vlan host switchport private-vlan host-association 40 400 no shutdown evaluated config attributes: switchport mode private-vlan host switchport private-vlan host-association 40 400 no shutdown assigned interfaces: Vethernet3 Vethernet4
System-uplink profile is trunking all vlans.
Is it possible to assign 2 ports to a vlan on this switch and have the 2 machines connected to those ports be able to see each other without having to go off of the switch? If so, how would it need to be setup on the switch?
View 4 Replies View Related We have a 24 port and 48 port 3560 E switches with identical IOS the 48 port switch supports private vlan while 24 port switch doesnt
configure private vlans on 24 ports 3560e and is it best practise to configure private vlan on this platform(3560)?
IOS version : C3560E Software (C3560E-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(55)SE3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
flash:/c3560e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE3/c3560e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE3.bin
I have a network with a Catalyst 3750 as the main switch and then some Catalyst 2960 switches that are plugged in to that. I have a server running windows server 2008 with a couple of virtual machines running in Hyper-V. I created 4 VLANS listed below and gave the 3750 the following IP Address.I would like the 3750 to only be configurable from VLAN 40 but currently every VLAN can connect to it, I noticed in the standard web page settings there was a setting for "Management VLAN" but it was set to 1 and would not let me change it, I kinda assumed that was for the management port in the back.-Now the tricky part, I was trying to set up routing between the VLANs and so far I have only been able to get a sort of "all or nothing" routing to work. I can turn IP routing on and add two or more VLANs to the routing and it works fine. But what I was hoping to do is create a couple of "junction vlans" that would only route to one or two other vlans. For instance, I wanted to create a VLAN 100 that routed to VLAN 20 and 30 but nothing else. I also want to route VLAN 1 just to VLAN 30, and so on. I am able to do each one of the cases but only one, it seems like the switch only supports one "routing table" am I missing something or is this just a limitation of the switch?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a network with several catalyst 2960 switches and one catalyst 3750. I have created two VLAN and set up the proper routing and everything is working fine there. I have a client/server application that used multicast in the initial start up for the client to determine available servers, the issue is one of my clients is on a different VLAN then the server. I am able to route the multicast using MVR as long as both the server and the client are plugged into the 3750 by creating a static route, making the server a source port and the client a receive port. Unfortunately I need the client and the server plugged in to different 2960s. My question is how do I establish multicast routing between the two and perferably do it dynamically (always route multicast traffic from one VLAN to another).
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have been looking into this for a while and I can't seem to figure out why my 2nd vlan is not able to connect properly to the net.
My switch has 12 ports where my devices connects directly, they are all on Vlan 1 and they all work perfectly. on Port 12 I have a dlink router that is connected to a cable modem. the dlink router has an Ip address of 192.168.0.20
I created a second vlan (vlan2) and enabled dhcp relay on it. then I assigned port 9 on the switch to (vlan2)my laptop which is connected to port 9 seems to get an ip address fine and able to ping only some devices on my network (vlan1) and is not able to go out to the internet. I think it has to do with the routes. [code]
In 3750 switch,I have configured intervlan routing.I have three vlans Vlan 10,vlan 20,Vlan 30 and I have assigned IP address for that Vlan.In vlan 10,I have connected one systen gigabitethernet 0/1 interface.From my system I am able to ping vlan 10 ip address but I can't able to ping other vlan ip address (vlan 20,vlan 30).Is it possible to up the protocol for all that time.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have two networks at two sites with a dot1q trunk between the two L3 switches at both sites (no routers involved)
SITE A - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50
10.10.50.0/24
SITE B - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50
10.20.50.0/24
I would like to extend the SITE A VLAN to SITE B so that I can move hosts from SITE A to SITE B without needing to change their IP address but the vlan ID is already in use. Obviously the easy solution is to change the VLAN ID for one or other of the sites but both sites contain hosts that run 24/7. Is there a way to join two VLANs with different IDs together.So for example I create a new VLAN 60 at SITE B and associate it with VLAN 50 at SITE A.
I have a quick query which i need ratified before proceeding. I have the following scenario -
Two Cisco 3750v2 switches with stackwiseISP allocated block of /26 (64 addresses)8 customers each with a VLAN and SVIInternet facing VLAN and SVIDefault route to ISP router Lets say the ISP has given me the network range 10.10.10.0/26 (we'll assume this is routable on the internet for the purposes of this example) and a default gateway to the internet of 10.10.10.1 within this range. I have configured a public facing VLAN as follows -
VLAN 300
name PUBLIC
int VLAN 300
IP Address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.252
I have then created a default route as follows -
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.1
With this configured, the switch can successfully route upstream to the internet with no problems. I have then moved onto the customers and depending on what service they have purchased, I have subnetted the 10.10.10.0/26 range into smaller subnets. See as follows -
Customer A - 10.10.10.4/30
Gateway IP - 10.10.10.5
Useable IPs - 10.10.10.6
Customer B - 10.10.10.8/29
Gateway IP - 10.10.10.9
Useable IPs - 10.10.10.10 - 10.10.10.14
This continues for each customer depending on how many IP's the have purchased. I have then assigned these IP ranges to a customer VLAN and SVI as follows -
Customer A
VLAN 10
name CUST-A-VLAN
int VLAN 10
ip address 10.10.10.5 255.255.255.252
[code].....
It is then up to the customer as to what equipment they use and how they NAT or firewall their internal networks.
I'm not sure if I'm missing something basic here however i though that I'd ask the question. I recieved a request from a client who is trying to seperate traffic out of a IBM P780 - one set of VIO servers/clients (Prod) is tagged with vlan x going out LAG 1 and another set of VIO server/clients (Test) is tagged with vlan y and z going out LAG 2. The problem is that the management subnet for these devices is on one subnet.
The infrastructure is the host device is trunked via LACP etherchannel to Nexus 2148TP(5010) which than connects to the distribution layer being a Catalyst 6504 VSS. I have tried many things today, however I feel that the correct solution to get this working is to use an Isolated trunk (as the host device does not have private vlan functionality) even though there is no requirement for hosts to be segregated. I have configured:
1. Private vlan mapping on the SVI;
2. Primary vlan and association, and isolated vlan on Distribution (6504 VSS) and Access Layer (5010/2148)
3. All Vlans are trunked between switches
4. Private vlan isolated trunk and host mappings on the port-channel interface to the host (P780).
I haven't had any luck. What I am seeing is as soon as I configure the Primary vlan on the Nexus 5010 (v5.2) (vlan y | private-vlan primary), this vlan (y) does not forward on any trunk on the Nexus 5010 switch, even without any other private vlan configuration. I believe this may be the cause to most of the issues I am having. Has any one else experienced this behaviour. Also, I haven't had a lot of experience with Private Vlans so I might be missing some fundamentals with this configuration.
I am looking into the possibility of using private vlan's for some dmz implementations however I do have what may be some very rudimentary questions. It seems straightforward how to configure the primary/secondary vlan configuration as well as associating them. However in my case I would be looking to configure the PVLAN on a 6500-vss platform acting as the router while all of the hosts which I would desire to have in the isolated vlan would be spread out across a number of older Cisco switches which only support "protected port" setup or Procurve switches all of which I do not have budget to replace with something newer. So in my scenario I would have a 6500 connected by trunk to multiple switches which only support a protected port setup such as a Procurve (top of rack) or a Cisco 2950. As the Procurve or 2950 would not support Private VLAN setup, do I then just configure the secondary vlan to be allowed across the trunk from the 6500, configure that vlan on the Procurve or 2950 (as vtp will not foward the info for the secondary vlan) and assign that vlan to the host port as well as setting it as a protected port and this will communicate just fine across the trunk to the router as well as stopping the protected port in top of rack switch 1 from being able to communicate to a protected port in top of rack 2,3,etc? If the above scenario is what needs to be done, do I just use a regular trunk or do I have to use a PVLAN trunk?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a low bandwith (15-20 Mbit/s) to the ASA from our Client vlan. If i connect the Client to the same vlan as the ASA is, the bandwith (90 Mbit/s) is good.
Here are the Layer 3 Design:
Client -> vlan 2 - Switch - vlan 7 -> vlan 1 - ASA 5505 -> ISP
The Layer 2 Design:
Client -> Gig2/0/13 - Switch - Gig4/0/43 -> Eth0/1 ASA5505 -> ISP
IP Address:
Client: 172.16.2.10Vlan2: 172.16.2.1Vlan7: 172.16.7.1ASA: 172.16.7.2
I assuming the switch has a problem with routing ?It is a stacked Switch with following members:
switch 1 provision ws-c3750g-12sswitch 2 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 3 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 4 provision ws-c3750x-48
And we have following error message in the log from the switch:
%PLATFORM_UCAST-4-PREFIX:
One or more specific prefixes could not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific prefix, and the packets may be software forwarded I first get the idea that the switch is overloaded with router traffic. Thats why i assuming i have to check the sdm templates, but i'm not sure if this resolves the issue.
Here are the relevant config:
ASA Interface on the Switch:
interface GigabitEthernet4/0/43description ASA-inside LANswitchport access vlan 7switchport mode accessspanning-tree portfast
Client Interface on the Switch:
interface GigabitEthernet3/0/1switchport access vlan 2switchport mode accessswitchport port-securityswitchport port-security aging time 2switchport port-security violation restrictswitchport port-security aging type inactivitymacro description cisco-desktopspanning-tree portfastspanning-tree bpduguard enable
[code]...
Have a quick question regarding inter-vlan routing on a 3750. Overview of network is ISP --> ASA --> 3750 (acting as my core and default gw). I have 5 vlan interfaces on my 3750, all w/ 192.192.x.x subnets, a 6th w/ 192.168.100.x, and a 7th w/ 192.168.200.x. I have enabled "ip routing" on the switch and can successfully ping from subnet A to subnet B as long as both devices are using the correct DG for their vlan, which is the switch. I have a few ports that are trunked as well that go to ESX hosts which break out the vlans according to the subnet the vm should be attached to. The ASA is set to nat internal traffic for all the vlans.
Now my question: short of applying an ACL to each vlan interface to block traffic from other 192.192.x.x subnets is there a better way to accomplish this? I want my 192.168.10.x subnet to be able to reach all the subnets, but don't want 192.192.10.x to be able to talk to 192.192.20.x for example. I was thinking to create an acl like this:
access-list 120 permit ip 192.192.10.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 120 deny ip 192.192.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.192.10.0 0.0.0.255access-list 120 permit ip any 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.192.10.0 0.0.0.255
and then applying this to the interface for the appropriate vlan.
I have one VLAN on a 3750 where I do not see any MAC addresses even though it is in use. This is an unrouted VLAN between a WLC on a port- channel /LAG and an access port to an ASA for guest traffic. When I do a show MAC add I get nothing for VLAN 60 (guest DMZ) but all other VLANs seem to be OK. Spanning tree is not showing TC counters incrementing either.
I also was told when put a port on this VLAN the laptop did not get a DHCP address form the ASA, but the wireless guest clients are working fine. I can see the DHCP leases and ARP entries in the ASA and the ASA ARP in the WLC so some traffic is passing fine. I'm not onsite right now so troubleshooting is all remote which limits some options.
I have setup both Vlans on 3com and cisco. but it seems they cant talk to each other.ive setup both on trunking mode?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a 3750 switch which has the command 'spanning-tree vlan **'. I am struggling to remove this command, as this particular VLAN is one I want to distribute across our network.I have so far, set the switch to VTP Transparent mode and removed the VLAN from the database, this removes the command. If I then put the switch back to VTP client mode (or manually add the VLAN, while in in VTP transparent mode) then the command comes back. Submitting the command 'spanning-tree vlan **' command has no affect.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have 3 VLANs here that need to be on the same network segment. They are going to be used by our Wi-Fi network (with Aironet APs), bound to 3 different SSIDs (as Aironet APs doesnt allow multiple SSID per VLAN), each one with a different authentication method and server.Is there a way to bridge those VLANs together with a Catalyst 3750 switch? I tryed configuring an IP address on one of the VLAN interfaces, then configuring a bridge with the vlan-bridge protocol (Catalyst 3750 doesnt have the "ieee" bridge protocol type) and put all 3 VLAN interfaces on the same bridge-group, but it didnt work (even with "bridge x route ip").I also tryed configuring IRB bridging, with the 3 VLAN interfaces on the same bridge-group and an IP address on the BVI interface (the way I used to do with old 2600 routers). Same result.(actually, I didint test to see if the interfaces are actually being "bridged", but I see neither of them can reach the router)
View 1 Replies View RelatedOne of my VLANS on my 3750 gives a status of act/lshut. I've tried no shut commands on the interface to no avail. From my reading it seems like this means the VLAN is active but shut down locally.
View 8 Replies View RelatedCannot set route map on interface vlan. which in non default vrf on Cisco 3750.IOS c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE.bin sdm prefer route in enable ip vrf users rd 200:0 route-target export 200:0 route-target import 200:0 interface Vlan201 description Users 1 ip vrf forwarding users ip address 10.31.76.1 255.255.252.0 ip helper-address 10.31.4.57 route-map fromuser permit 10 match ip address fromuser set ip next-hop 10.31.128.155 When I enter "ip policy route-map fromuser" to interface Vlan 201 I heve the message:
% Remove VRF configuration from interface Vlan201 first
I have installed a Catalyst 2960-S and a 3750-X-12S and I am trying to setup a VLAN 51 for some VoIP phones. I have added the VLAN as an interface on both switches, but the 3750 is not showing VLAN 51 as active when i do a show vlan. Also, it omitts showing Gi1/0/1 & Gi1/0/3 which are uplinks to 2960-S switches plugged in and working on VLAN1.
Catalyst3750SFP#show vlan
VLAN Name Status Ports
---- -------------------------------- --------- -------------------------------
1 default active Gi1/0/2, Gi1/0/4, Gi1/0/5
[Code].....
I have 3750 series with GIBICs ports I want to create 10 vlans with its sub-net and enable all vlans to access internet.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI config vlans 21-23 on 3750 A and B switches.I config B switch to be Root Bridge for all vlansspanning-tree vlan 1,21-23, priority 4096 sh span tree on B switch 3750B# sh spanning-tree.
View 18 Replies View RelatedI have a network with the following structure
internet ---- cisco2911 ----cisco3750 --- internal lan
I have two email servers on different vlan
192.168.0.1 ----- 1.1.1.2 (public ip)
10.1.1.65 ---- 1.1.1.3 (public ip)
Before these servers were directly connected to the internet with two nics (Nightmare, I know). The Public IP on internet facing NIC and private ip on LAN facing nic. I'm in the process of changing this.I'm able to access internet from my vlans and also able to send emails but cannot receive emails on these servers.
My router congif is as follows:
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 6234 bytes
!
version 15.1
no service pad
service tcp-keepalives-in
service tcp-keepalives-out
service timestamps debug datetime msec localtime show-timezone
service timestamps log datetime msec localtime show-timezone
[code]....
Currently we have a 6513 core (running IOS and doing limited routing) with VLAN Trunking to about a dozen 3560 edge switches, with various VLANs going to each of the edge switches. All works well. We are downsizing and replacing the 6513 core with a 3750G stack. We have the stack up and running in the lab, and want to slowly (as we move floors) migrate all of the edge switching to the 3750 stack.
The plan is to connect the 3750 stack to the 6513, then slowly migrate the edge switches to the stack (from the 6513). I would like to put in place 4 x 1GB trunk links between the 6513 and the 3750 stack before I start moving edge switches to ensure adequate bandwidth. Once all of the edge switches are on the new 3750 stack, I will start to decommission the 6513.
What is the best way to configure the links between the cores (old 6513 and new 3750 stack)? I can easily get the edge switches configured to the 3750, but am worried about the core links. I really want to avoid having to perform an all-at-once cutover of the cores. Another question is when do I try and migrate the VTP server role from the 6513 to the 3750 stack? I could simply make everything transparent, and ditch server-based VTP, as we rarely change or creat VLANs.
I'm having some trouble getting my head round the following but I think it's routing related?
I have a Cisco 3750 switch with the following configured:
interface Vlan1
ip address 192.168.0.223 255.255.254.0
no ip route-cache
[Code].....
The 3750 is connected to a firewall which handles the routing. From the 3750 I can only ping remote networks from the vlan1 interface not from vlan6,8 or 10 i.e ping 10.34.37.101 (remote network) source 192.168.0.223 (vlan1) works but ping 10.34.37.101 source 10.74.10.1 (vlan10) does not? I can ping 10.34.37.101 from computers on the various vlans but not from the 3750 it self.
I looked at setting a default gateway for the various vlan interfaces
My architecture is the same as show on the link with some difference.I use the router 1841 for inetrnet connexion instead of 7200VXR, this router 1841 is connected on the catalyst 3750 port G1/0/1.I use catalyst 2960 instead of catalyst 2950 or 2948.I use ASA 5510 for conexion on remote branche(I have 5 remote site), This ASA is connected on the catalyst 3750 port G1/0/37
Result of the test:
-I can ping devices in the same Vlans
-I can ping devices in different VLANs
-I can ping all device from the catalyst 3750
I cannot ping the router 1841 or ASA 5510 from the any devices (computer)The gateway of each computer is the correpondant VLAN IP address configured on the catalyst 3750.Why I cannot ping the router 1841 or ASA 5510 from the any devices (computer)