Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cannot Set Route-map On Interface Vlan In Non Default Vrf On 3750
Dec 12, 2012
Cannot set route map on interface vlan. which in non default vrf on Cisco 3750.IOS c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE.bin sdm prefer route in enable ip vrf users rd 200:0 route-target export 200:0 route-target import 200:0 interface Vlan201 description Users 1 ip vrf forwarding users ip address 10.31.76.1 255.255.252.0 ip helper-address 10.31.4.57 route-map fromuser permit 10 match ip address fromuser set ip next-hop 10.31.128.155 When I enter "ip policy route-map fromuser" to interface Vlan 201 I heve the message:
% Remove VRF configuration from interface Vlan201 first
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 27, 2010
IP SLA configuration fails over but cannot ping the 4.2.2.2 via Site B. Here is the output on Cisco 3750...
SW2#show runBuilding configuration...
Current configuration : 2901 bytes!version 12.2no service padservice timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname SW2!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!!!!no aaa
[Code].....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2012
I have a 3750 at a branch running EIGRP connected to two routers that both have configured:
access-list 1 deny 0.0.0.0
access-list 1 permit any
access-list 2 permit 0.0.0.0
access-list 2 deny any
router eigrp 1distribute-list 1 out FastEthernet0/0distribute-list 2 in FastEthernet0/0
Due to this recently applied config the switch become unreachable from the outside and cannot ping anything. Everything connected to it works fine. I was able to remote into it from a switch behind it and noticed that the 3750 has no default route in the routing table. I do see a default route in the eigrp topology table. How to make the switch learn a default route maintaining the existing configuration on the routers.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 23, 2012
I just got my Cisco SG300 28, but I have some problems getting the routing to work. I get the vlans to get to the router, with the default route. But not getting them to talk with each other. I can ping the IPs from the cisco, but I am not getting traffic to go from vlan 1 to vlan 2. When I try to google, it say that it should do it automatically, and I found no setting for it. It looks like it not creating any route for the interfaces.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2012
I am trying to configure policy based routing however when i try to apply to an interface vlan. The configuration does not show in the interface.
route-map OTHER_ROUTE permit 10
match ip address OTHER_ROUTE
set ip next-hop x.x.x.x
[Code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2012
Here is my configuration below , i have upgraded my C-3750 switch IOS from IPbase to IPservices , after upgrading i have tried to apply PBR on my Vlan 4 and failed , when i am tying to apply route-map to Vlan4 the command was taking but i am unable to see the route-map when sh run , i am giving the command as "ip policy route-map TTSL" in my Vlan4 , below is the configuration.
In Vlan2 i have connected one ISP and Vlan4 I have connected one ISP , my local subnets are 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x , now i want to route the 192.168.1.x traffic from Vlan2 and 192.168.2.x Traffic from Vlan4 .
sh boot
coreswitch#sh boot
BOOT path-list : flash:c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5/c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5.bin
[Code].....
View 9 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2013
I have configured a vlan interface on a 3750 switch. there is aprox 4Mb active traffic flowing through the interface, but when I do a "show interface vlan (vlanid)" the output show zero bits in and zero bits out. Its a typical L3 config with one IP on the vllan interface acting as the gateway for the VLAN devices. Is this a normal behaviur ? and if so is there any way to get the traffic in/out stats. The end PC/devices are connected to this switch via an L2 TRUNK and I dont have access to the L2 switch on which the actual devices connect. so cant get the real time stats of those interfaces.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2013
I've been given the task to clean-up our network config, and have walked into a disaster zone.We have a 4510R on site with everyone using the default VLAN, VLAN 1.I have created 4 new VLANS, VLAN100, VLAN150, VLAN200, VLAN250 I have assigned interface addresses to each VLAN and configured Inter VLAN routing.I can route to and from each new vlan with no problem, i.e VLAN250>VLAN100 VlAN100>VLAN200 etc but I can't route to VLAN 1(Default VLAN) from any of them, I can ping the interface on VLAN 1 from any VLAN , but any hosts are unreachable. On the flip side , from VLAN 1 I can route to all of the VLANS.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 31, 2013
i need to solves this little problem on 2960S lan BASE but i dont know if it is possible.
Uplink port config for gi 1/0/28 is:
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk alloved vlan 10,11
but on interface gi 1/0/1 i want to have data from vlan 10 tagged as VLAN 20.
At this time i have solved this issue very primitively
I have set up gi 1/0/2 as int mode acces, acces vlan 20 and i have connected gi 1/0/2 with gi 1/0/3 with eth cable. int gi 1/0/3 is switchpor mode acces, switchport acces vlan 10
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2012
I have a MPLS cloud in our data center. I want one network coming into our core router to have a different default route than the other networks coming in. I'm getting hits on the acl but the route isn't applied and goes to the default route that is configured in the router. I have other PBR for setting local-preferences and as-paths and they are working fine.
The router is a 7206 Version 12.4(11)T3
!
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.2.3.4
!
ip access-list extended 2nd_Default_Route
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2013
I have a Cisco 2960 ( WS-C2960-8TC-S) running 12.2(46)SE C2960-LANLITEK9-M image.I would like to set an ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 87.101.156.97 but the current image does not allow.Will ip default-gateway 87.101.156.97 work or do I need ip routing ?The ISP has provided a /30 address and we are using an additional /29 for our network devices. I dont think this image can be upgraded. I need to forward routes directly out to ISP. [code]
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 19, 2012
I'm working on a little OSPF setup in my lab and having a problem pinging out to the internet.I have a setup with (3) 3550's running ip routing. I'm configuring OSPF but I can't ping the internet from any L3 switch except the switch with the actual uplink to the internet.[code] From SW2 and SW3, I can ping SW1 on all IPs (192.168.1.90, 10.10.10.1, 10.10.10.5) but I can't ping 192.168.1.1 which is my gateway to the internet.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 25, 2013
We have two catalyst 3560 switches running c3560-ipbasek9-mz.122-58.SE2.bin They are connected using etherchannel using gi 0/21 - 24 interfaces.
on 3560-1 switch, there isn't any ip-default gateway or ip route configured. It only have 1 interface vlan configured.
on 3560-2 switch, there is ip default gateway configured along with 1 interface vlan.
What i dont understand here is that, i can reach out to other subnets from 3560-1 switch in which the routing is not enabled?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2013
I have two networks at two sites with a dot1q trunk between the two L3 switches at both sites (no routers involved)
SITE A - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50
10.10.50.0/24
SITE B - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50
10.20.50.0/24
I would like to extend the SITE A VLAN to SITE B so that I can move hosts from SITE A to SITE B without needing to change their IP address but the vlan ID is already in use. Obviously the easy solution is to change the VLAN ID for one or other of the sites but both sites contain hosts that run 24/7. Is there a way to join two VLANs with different IDs together.So for example I create a new VLAN 60 at SITE B and associate it with VLAN 50 at SITE A.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2012
We have a low bandwith (15-20 Mbit/s) to the ASA from our Client vlan. If i connect the Client to the same vlan as the ASA is, the bandwith (90 Mbit/s) is good.
Here are the Layer 3 Design:
Client -> vlan 2 - Switch - vlan 7 -> vlan 1 - ASA 5505 -> ISP
The Layer 2 Design:
Client -> Gig2/0/13 - Switch - Gig4/0/43 -> Eth0/1 ASA5505 -> ISP
IP Address:
Client: 172.16.2.10Vlan2: 172.16.2.1Vlan7: 172.16.7.1ASA: 172.16.7.2
I assuming the switch has a problem with routing ?It is a stacked Switch with following members:
switch 1 provision ws-c3750g-12sswitch 2 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 3 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 4 provision ws-c3750x-48
And we have following error message in the log from the switch:
%PLATFORM_UCAST-4-PREFIX:
One or more specific prefixes could not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific prefix, and the packets may be software forwarded I first get the idea that the switch is overloaded with router traffic. Thats why i assuming i have to check the sdm templates, but i'm not sure if this resolves the issue.
Here are the relevant config:
ASA Interface on the Switch:
interface GigabitEthernet4/0/43description ASA-inside LANswitchport access vlan 7switchport mode accessspanning-tree portfast
Client Interface on the Switch:
interface GigabitEthernet3/0/1switchport access vlan 2switchport mode accessswitchport port-securityswitchport port-security aging time 2switchport port-security violation restrictswitchport port-security aging type inactivitymacro description cisco-desktopspanning-tree portfastspanning-tree bpduguard enable
[code]...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2012
Right now I have 2 default routes load balancing 100MB internet links. This is on my 2 6509's.
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.47.2.1 (FWSM)
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.47.2.250 (5510)
Is there anyway to make the first default route take more of the traffic, like 60/40 or 70/30?Any program that I could use to see top users going through the FWSM?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2012
Recently we observed that newly installed WS-C3560CG-8PC access switches are able to communicate without a default route or default gateway.The 3650 switches are used as a layer2 access switch behind a layer3 distribution/core. They have only the management VLAN configured for IP with a single address.
The ARP table looks like there is an implicit proxy-ARP request sent for any IP address.
We definitely have no configuration whatsoever which would explain this.
Is this a new feature? We don't observe that with the older 2960-series...
Here is a brief trace of what's happening (debug arp):
host41#ping 1.1.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
Sep 20 14:44:06.706: IP ARP: sent req src 10.1.8.41 1833.9dc9.wxyz,
dst 1.1.1.1 0000.0000.0000 Vlan1
Sep 20 14:44:06.711: IP ARP: rcvd rep src 1.1.1.1 2c54.2dd3.wxyz, dst 10.1.8.41 Vlan1..
[code]....
The mac address if of course the mac address of the layer 3 interfaces of the distribution switch, no surprise here (proxy ARP is turned on by default).
Why is the 3560 sending out proxy arp requests without being told to? As far as I understood proxy ARP on Cisco IOS it only means it will reply to a proxy ARP request but will not send out proxy ARP requests by default.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2012
I have a 3560G and an ASA FW, for which I am trying to use PBR to append the next hop. The gateway is the switch VLAN address and the amended net hop is the same VLAN interface on the ASA. Trouble is, I can ping the FW from a client, but not the switch. If I remove the route map, I can ping both. Even more strange is this is the case for some VLANs, but not all!
Config:
HOST ON VLAN 96
IP 10.11.120.99
S/M 255.255.255.240
[Code].....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2012
A check out a network segment and want to know why SwA has a static route to SwB if SwA already has a Default GW to Core?
(SwA, SwB - Catalyst3560, Core - Catalyst4948)Note, there are distribute list on SwA - it does not has any OSPF route (exclude O*IA).
Does this mean when SwA send out packet with DA 10.5.64.0/26, Core will use only L2 switching (instead of L3)? Is this more effectively for Core Switch?
Pleace check my reasoning:
1. When use a static route: SwA receive packet from Vlan 20 with DA 10.5.64.0/26 it will strip out Dest. MAC and replace it with MAC of SwB. Core will switch this packet to SwB based on mac add. table (l2 switching)
2. When SwA has only Default gateway and receive packet from Vlan20 with DA 10.5.64.0/26 it replace Dest. MAC with Core MAC. Core receive this packet, lookup route table for 10.5.64.0 entry and forward packet base on this.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2011
We have recently purchased a Cisco SG300 and have been configuring it. [code] The VLANs have ACLs set up to prevent any communication between the Holly and Tempo VLANs (and their associated WAN VLANs).Each VLAN has a WAN available for it's use, which connects to external networks (including the Internet).In order to facilitate this, we have set up all the necessary ACLs and routes and confirmed that this all works.However, the problem comes when we assign the static routes that specify the default gateways.We add the two static routes below:
-0.0.0.0 next hop 10.10.200.254 metric 1
-0.0.0.0 next hop 192.168.200.254 metric 1
In this case, only one of the VLANs has WAN access. It is either Holly or Tempo (it can be either if the order the static route is added is changed).What we need is to force Holly to use Holly WAN and Tempo to use Tempo WAN, but we cannot see a way of doing this.Effectively, we want the following static routes: [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2012
We're running a simple policy map on a 3750 stack (IOS version 12.2(53)SE2), but the route-map counters do not show any matches:
NYKIRDRCX01#sh route-map
route-map remote-route, permit, sequence 51
Match clauses:
ip address (access-lists): remoteACL
Set clauses:
ip next-hop 192.168.101.5
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
However, I've confirmed via our netflow monitor that the traffic we're trying to send to the appropriate next hop is, indeed, getting there correctly.
I've seen issues in the past with a 3750 not reporting counters correctly.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2010
I try to enter the command "ip policy route-map" on 3750's interface. But the command doesn't appear. Why? Whereas I see several times that this command is possible on this switch. What I have to do to enter this command?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 19, 2012
I have a 3750 stack with several vlans and svi's. We have had no need to route between them until now. Here is what I have done...
Created the vlans.. vlan 1 and vlan 25
Given each vlan an ip address vlan 1 10.0.0.2 and vlan 25 is 192.168.5.250
no shut on everything
ip routing
sdm routing preferred
default route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 (isp)
If I'm on the switch I can ping anything on vlan 1 and anything on vlan 25 (the device I'm pinging on vlan25 is the svi and a dsl router 192.168.5.1) From a computer on vlan 1 I can ping the gateway/svi for vlan 1 and the svi for vlan 25 but no devices including the dsl router which pinged fine. If I put the computer on an access port for vlan 25 I can ping everything just fine on vlan 25 but not vlan 1 (gateway set correctly)
As a test I put in a static route ip route 195.113.20.11 255.255.255.255 192.168.5.1
I did a traceroute from the switch and it comes through great. I did a traceroute from the computer and it hits my gateway of 10.0.0.2 vlan 1 and stops.
View 13 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2012
I have Catalyst 3750. and 2 ISPs
I wanted to use, let say on port5 of Catalyst 3750 only 2nd the ISP will route to this port.
The rest is pointed to the 1st ISP.
Im thinking of using VLAN..
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 10, 2012
I just checked that PBR with setting ip default next-hop is not available on cat 3750. Any other way to do dual-homing ISP without this feature?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 4, 2013
I have the following zebra.conf on my router box "A":
hostname nuclear-router
password password
enable password password
interface eth0
ip address 192.168.2.1/24
multicast
[code]...
eth0 is connected to a switch and contains the 192.168.2.0/24 range, and A is connected to my WRT54GL "B" (with IP 192.168.1.1, containing 192.168.1.0/24 range, DHCP serves IPs above .100) wirelessly. B is connected directly to my DSL modem.
The problem is that when I specify the default route using the interface name, I can't connect to the internet from A or any hosts behind it - I'm always hit with a "no route to host" error. Name lookup and pinging any local host (even in a different range) or the DSL modem works fine - it's only when going beyond the modem that things stop working. However, when I use the IP of B as the gateway, it works fine. I noticed that route output on A when the default route was specified using the interface alone had only an asterisk in the gateway column. I was under the impression that these approaches should be identical in practice, so though I got it working, I'd like to know what I'm misunderstanding (and/or misconfiguring). Why didn't the default route work when specified using just the interface?
All routers and the modem too have RIP (version 2) enabled, and of course the password isn't really the word "password".
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 16, 2012
I have a 3750 switch and I am trying to configure PBR (route-maps) in it.But when I try to apply the policy to a vlan interface the policy does not show in the interface.So I can not use PBR to choose my default gateway!Question: Does PBR work in a 3750 switch? Can PBR be configured in a vlan interface? There is any problem with the IOS that I do not know?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 6, 2013
I have a Cisco 3750 stack with 5 members.
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image
------ ----- ----- ---------- ----------
1 24 WS-C3750G-24T 12.2(55)SE6 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
2 24 WS-C3750G-24T 12.2(55)SE6 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
* 3 24 WS-C3750G-24T 12.2(55)SE6 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
4 52 WS-C3750G-48TS 12.2(55)SE6 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
5 52 WS-C3750G-48TS 12.2(55)SE6 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
I have recently set the sdm prefer template to routing to allow route-maps and rebooted the stack:
3750GCORE#show sdm preferThe current template is "desktop routing" template.The selected template optimizes the resources inthe switch to support this level of features for8 routed interfaces and 1024 VLANs.
number of unicast mac addresses: 3K number of IPv4 IGMP groups + multicast routes: 1K number of IPv4 unicast routes: 11K number of directly-connected IPv4 hosts: 3K number of indirect IPv4 routes: 8K number of IPv4 policy based routing aces: 0.5K number of IPv4/MAC qos aces: 0.5K number of IPv4/MAC security aces: 1K
I still cannot apply a route map to a vlan interface however:
I have preconfigured the route map as per below to take traffic from one particular client and pass it to the inside interface of our ASA firewall:(yes i know 192.9.0.0 is a public network, its an inherited problem that is in process of being remedied!)
ip access-list extended TEST
permit ip host 192.9.216.234 any
permit icmp host 192.9.216.234 any
permit tcp host 192.9.216.234 any
route-map TEST_MAP permit 9
match ip address TEST
set ip default next-hop 192.9.201.10
When i do the following I get this error from debug:
3750GCORE#config t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
3750GCORE(config)#int vlan 216
3750GCORE(config-if)#ip policy route-map TEST_MAP
3750GCORE(config-if)#
007804: Feb 8 03:16:55: %PLATFORM_PBR-3-UNSUPPORTED_RMAP: Route-map TEST_MAP not supported for Policy-Based Routing
when I show the running config, the route-map is not there.3750GCORE#show running-config int vlan 216Building configuration...Current configuration : 205 bytes!interface Vlan216
no ip redirectsip directed-broadcast 101end
why TEST_MAP is not supported?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 29, 2012
this is router 887, its vlan is 192.168.3.1/24. If I'd like to add a static route via different host within same vlan, rather than the router, like:
ip route 192.168.100.0/24 192.168.3.6
How can we achieve it? I tried adding it directly and failed:
(config)#ip route 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.6
%Invalid next hop address (it's this router)
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2013
I gave one of my interfaces a IPv6 address the other day and now all of my servers have IPv6 addresses in that subnet.
I'm reading about "ipv6 nd suppress-ra" and I think that's what I need to disable but that's not a valid command on the 3750.
Is there a way to disable this 'automatic IP giving out' thing that I have going on?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2013
I'm attempting to redistribute a static route into EIGRP on a 3750 switch and pass it to an upstream router, sadly however this isn't working, or at least the route isn't being recieved on the upstream router. [code]
View 10 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2013
We have a 14 offfice MPLS network. All offices have Cisco 3750s running OSPF which replicate route tables via our providers BGP peers. I am introducing a new network in our SF office which is not directly connected so in SF we have a static route "ip route 172.16.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.1. I want our other offices to learn this route route via OSPF so that they know how to get to the new network. My problem is that of course remote sites do not see our static routes and i have tried to add this via ospf but the switch will not propagate this route because it is not directly connected to the switch in SF.
router ospf 1
log-adjacency-changes
network 10.2.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 2.2.2.2
[Code]......
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2013
I have a client with a 3750x stack. We've upgraded it to IP Services. We have a simple PBR setup. One access-list to forward traffic from a specific LAN ip to another gateway on the network.
I go to vlan1 (default vlan) to apply the PBR and the command takes with no errors, but do a "show run" and it doesn't show up under the interface.
I go to vlan1 and apply a PBR that doesn't exist and the command takes with no errors, and is listed under the interface in the config
I can apply the PBR globally and appears to work, but we can't have it there based on other issues it creates.
config: (all tracks are up)
C3750_stack#show sdm prefer
The current template is "desktop routing" template.
[Code]....
View 8 Replies
View Related
