Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 STP Vlan 21 And 22 Root Bridge On 2 Switches

Feb 16, 2013

I config vlans 21-23 on 3750 A and B switches.I config B  switch to be Root Bridge for all vlansspanning-tree vlan 1,21-23, priority 4096 sh span tree on B  switch 3750B#  sh spanning-tree.

View 18 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: VLAN Bridge With Catalyst 3750

Nov 8, 2012

I have 3 VLANs here that need to be on the same network segment.  They are going to be used by our Wi-Fi network (with Aironet APs), bound to 3 different SSIDs (as Aironet APs doesnt allow multiple SSID per VLAN), each one with a different authentication method and server.Is there a way to bridge those VLANs together with a Catalyst 3750 switch?  I tryed configuring an IP address on one of the VLAN interfaces, then configuring a bridge with the vlan-bridge protocol (Catalyst 3750 doesnt have the "ieee" bridge protocol type) and put all 3 VLAN interfaces on the same bridge-group, but it didnt work (even with "bridge x route ip").I also tryed configuring IRB bridging, with the 3 VLAN interfaces on the same bridge-group and an IP address on the BVI interface (the way I used to do with old 2600 routers).  Same result.(actually, I didint test to see if the interfaces are actually being "bridged", but I see neither of them can reach the router)

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 8192 / STP Root Bridge Is Pointing At FWSM?

Feb 11, 2013

I have two 6509s both with single FWSMs running in transparent mode with bridged Inside and Outside VLANs.I have my Core A set to STP priority of 8192 and Core B set to 16,384 to make Core A the root for all VLANs.Problem I have is when I look at spanning-tree on Core A for Inside VLAN 324 it states to get to the Root go via PO100 (Cost of 9) and that the Root also has a Priority of 8192, but as the designated Root has a lower MAC address it's pointing to the etherchannel. PO100 is L2 Etherchannel between the Cores.Moving accross PO100 to Core B and running the show spanning-tree command I can see that to get to the Root Bridge I need to go via PO272.  PO272 is the internal Etherchannel to get to the FWSM on the Core B Switch.  This shows a cost of 6 to get to the Root and a mac address of the Root Bridge which resides on Core A (Outside VLAN 124)To give some perspectibe,theoutside VLAN of the pair has it's STP ROOT on the Core A switch as intended?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2950 Root Bridge ID / Avoid Loop

Jan 18, 2012

I have an Extremely Old switch that I need to connect to my network.  Because it is so old I don't want it to become the Root Switch.
 
what is the command to change the priority. (Honestly I don't remember if it has to be a lower number 1 or a higher number ). Always get that mixed up. I've read about root guard, but I would like to prevent it manually. (It is a small network after all)It is a Cisco 2950.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: Associate Non-root Bridge Model 1310 To Root Bridge Model 1400?

Apr 24, 2012

Can I associate the non-root bridge model 1310 to the root bridge model 1400? Is there any problems on the configuration I need to be aware of?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Adding Vlan To Trunk Drops HP Switches 3750 Behind

Nov 13, 2012

I have a 3750 as a core and have a series of HP Procurve switches that are daisy chained using one port.  I have two vlans on the port now (6 &9) and everything works fine, all switches communicate and end devices on the switches are also talking.  There is a requirement to add a device towards the end of the chain which requires it to connect using Vlan1.  Once I add Vlan1 to the port onthe 3750 I lose connectivity to all the HP switches.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: 1400 - Equipment Cannot Bridge To Other Root Or Not-root Mode

May 3, 2013

We have a problem with a Cisco 1400 Bridge.   This equipment can not bridge to the other root or not root mode. I can see a message "Interface Dot11Radio0 Radio transmit power out of range" and the MAC Address of Dot11Radio0 appears with 0000.0000.0000.I set the local power to 18 but the MAC Address is still in 0000.0000.0000.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - Extending VLAN To Remote Switch That Already Has VLAN ID In Use

Jan 10, 2013

I have two networks at two sites with a dot1q trunk between the two L3 switches at both sites (no routers involved)
 
SITE A - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50
10.10.50.0/24
 
SITE B - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50
10.20.50.0/24
 
I would like to extend the SITE A VLAN to SITE B so that I can move hosts from SITE A to SITE B without needing to change their IP address but the vlan ID is already in use. Obviously the easy solution is to change the VLAN ID for one or other of the sites but both sites contain hosts that run 24/7. Is there a way to join two VLANs with different IDs together.So for example I create a new VLAN 60 at SITE B and associate it with VLAN 50 at SITE A.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Low Bandwidth On 3750 From Vlan To Vlan?

Nov 20, 2012

We have a low bandwith (15-20 Mbit/s) to the ASA from our Client vlan. If i connect the Client to the same vlan as the ASA is, the bandwith (90 Mbit/s) is good.
 
Here are the Layer 3 Design:
 
Client     ->     vlan 2 - Switch - vlan 7     ->     vlan 1 - ASA 5505     ->     ISP
 
The Layer 2 Design:
 
Client     ->     Gig2/0/13 - Switch - Gig4/0/43     ->     Eth0/1 ASA5505     ->     ISP
 
IP Address:
Client: 172.16.2.10Vlan2: 172.16.2.1Vlan7: 172.16.7.1ASA: 172.16.7.2
  
I assuming the switch has a problem with routing ?It is a stacked Switch with following members:

switch 1 provision ws-c3750g-12sswitch 2 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 3 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 4 provision ws-c3750x-48
 
And we have following error message in the log from the switch:

%PLATFORM_UCAST-4-PREFIX: 

One or more specific prefixes could not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific prefix, and the packets may be software forwarded I first get the idea that the switch is overloaded with router traffic. Thats why i assuming i have to check the sdm templates, but i'm not sure if this resolves the issue. 
 
Here are the relevant config:
 
ASA Interface on the Switch:

interface GigabitEthernet4/0/43description ASA-inside LANswitchport access vlan 7switchport mode accessspanning-tree portfast
 
Client Interface on the Switch:

interface GigabitEthernet3/0/1switchport access vlan 2switchport mode accessswitchport port-securityswitchport port-security aging time 2switchport port-security violation restrictswitchport port-security aging type inactivitymacro description cisco-desktopspanning-tree portfastspanning-tree bpduguard enable

[code]...

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 As A Port Channel Bridge?

Dec 7, 2011

I have 3750 core/distribution switches with routing enabled in two offices connected with copper link and L3 port channel interfaces. NewOffice#2 has moved about 5 miles farther away from office#1 and I have to deploy new core/distribution switch connect it to old core#2 via F.O and move all access switches with it. Old core will stay in old #2 offices as a bridge between office#1 and new office#2 Office#1core<->copper (Ethernet) <->oldoffice#2core<->f.o. <->new office#2core How I should configure port channels ports on oldoffice#2 core to act as bridge between office#1 core/dist and newoffice#2 core/dist without changing anything else (ip, etc) on whole network

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 BPDU Guard And Bridge Loops

May 22, 2013

We have an environment where users create a lot of bridge loops.  We have tried to send E-mails about it and educate the users but it is almost a lost cause at this point.  The loops are created when users don’t pay attention and they plug a patch cable coming off of an access port up to ANOTHER access port by mistake.
 
All of our access ports are from 3750 stacked switches.  The way we tried to deal with this in the beginning was with BPDUGuard and ERRDiable (BPDUGuard) auto recovery.  We turned BPDUGuard on globally and left BPDUGuard auto recovery at the default value (I believe it was 30 seconds). so a loop would be detected and after 30 seconds, the switch would try to enable the port and if the loop still existed, close the port for 30 more seconds.  Then we started having problems with printers getting "fried".  Their NICs would die out and the control board would need to be replaced.  After a lot of troubleshooting and testing, it was determined that allowing the ports to come out of ERRDisabled state would flood the network and the packets would generate in the millions per second range and fry the NIC of these printer.
 
The fix for this and saving the printers was terrible.  We removed ERRDisable auto recovery and just let the ports that are looped stay in an ERRRDisabled state.  We wait for the user to figure out the loop and try to use the port and then put in a work order.  Then we physically visit the site and verify the port was shut (ERRDisabled) from a loop and we bounce the port (shut/no shut) and everything is resolved. I did lab tests with a switch looped and a printer on the switch and watched it fry.  We have had no printers fry after we removed the auto recovery protocol at every location.  Only the locations where loops existed and auto recovery protocol running were printers going bad.  What I found during my lab tests was that each time the port was auto-recovered (yes, for that millisecond while it checks if a loop still exists), more packets were re-generated and eventually enough was re-broadcastthat printers would go down.  We never had a problem with computer NICs.  I guess the cheaper printer NICs couldn’t handle the broadcast storms created by this.  I tried playing with the auto recovery timers and even the highest setting would eventually re-create these storms.
 
 So my question is what best practices are others using?  Should we get rid of BPDUGuard and just try to let spanning-tree handle these bridge loops?  Is there something else I can try?  I’m not CCNA by any means, just trying to do what I can in my environment.  Manually visiting sites when loops occur is becoming more and more my job, though and I have plenty of other things to be doing.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Stackable Switches Etherchannel To Core Switches

Nov 18, 2011

If I have two stackable switches one switch uplinks to one 6509 core switch and the other connection uplinks to another 6509 core switch, and also the other stackable switch does not connect to the core switches. Because I am using hsrp and also we are not using vss then one uplink to the core is not in used only ones is so then how does creating an etherchannel between does two uplinks to both core switches benefit me in anyway such as more bandwith and using both uplinks at the same time or I'm I wrong?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Stackable Switches And 6509 Core Switches

Nov 14, 2011

If I have two stackable switches were only one stackable switch has two uplinks one uplink goes to one core 6509 switch and the other uplink goes to the other 6509 core switch can a Layer 3 etherchannel be used if each uplink go to a different core switch, by the way hsrp is running between both switches and also can you give an example how data will be routed from the stackable switch through the ethernetchannel to one of the core switch accross the WAN to another core switch?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Multiple VLAN Routing Tables For 3750 Catalyst

Oct 24, 2012

I have a network with a Catalyst 3750 as the main switch and then some Catalyst 2960 switches that are plugged in to that. I have a server running windows server 2008 with a couple of virtual machines running in Hyper-V. I created 4 VLANS listed below and gave the 3750 the following IP Address.I would like the 3750 to only be configurable from VLAN 40 but currently every VLAN can connect to it, I noticed in the standard web page settings there was a setting for "Management VLAN" but it was set to 1 and would not let me change it, I kinda assumed that was for the management port in the back.-Now the tricky part, I was trying to set up routing between the VLANs and so far I have only been able to get a sort of "all or nothing" routing to work. I can turn IP routing on and add two or more VLANs to the routing and it works fine. But what I was hoping to do is create a couple of "junction vlans" that would only route to one or two other vlans. For instance, I wanted to create a VLAN 100 that routed to VLAN 20 and 30 but nothing else. I also want to route VLAN 1 just to VLAN 30, and so on. I am able to do each one of the cases but only one, it seems like the switch only supports one "routing table" am I missing something or is this just a limitation of the switch?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3750 Multi-cast VLAN Routing

Oct 28, 2012

I have a network with several catalyst 2960 switches and one catalyst 3750. I have created two VLAN and set up the proper routing and everything is working fine there. I have a client/server application that used multicast in the initial start up for the client to determine available servers, the issue is one of my clients is on a different VLAN then the server. I am able to route the multicast using MVR as long as both the server and the client are plugged into the 3750 by creating a static route, making the server a source port and the client a receive port. Unfortunately I need the client and the server plugged in to different 2960s. My question is how do I establish multicast routing between the two and perferably do it dynamically (always route multicast traffic from one VLAN to another).

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Inter-VLan Routing On Catalyst 3750 Switch

Dec 17, 2011

I have been looking into this for a while and I can't seem to figure out why my 2nd vlan is not able to connect properly to the net.
 
My switch has 12 ports where my devices connects directly, they are all on Vlan 1 and they all work perfectly. on Port 12 I have a dlink router that is connected to a cable modem. the dlink router has an Ip address of 192.168.0.20
 
I created a second vlan (vlan2) and enabled dhcp relay on it. then I assigned port 9 on the switch to  (vlan2)my laptop which is connected to port 9 seems to get an ip address fine and able to ping only some devices on my network (vlan1) and is not able to go out to the internet.  I think it has to do with the routes. [code]

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Inter Vlan Routing Configuration

Mar 24, 2013

In 3750 switch,I have configured intervlan routing.I have three vlans Vlan 10,vlan 20,Vlan 30 and I have assigned IP address for that Vlan.In vlan 10,I have connected one systen gigabitethernet 0/1 interface.From my system I am able to ping vlan 10 ip address but I can't able to ping other vlan ip address (vlan 20,vlan 30).Is it possible to up the protocol for all that time.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Private VLAN With Routing

Jan 1, 2012

I have a Cisco 3750 with private VLANS configured.. VLAN 2 is the "primary", VLAN 3 is "isolated" and VLAN 4 is "community".  This is all working correctly, however I now have the need to another VLAN called "production". I need the production VLAN to be able to reach all the private VLAN hosts (community and Isolated), and vice versa

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - Public VLAN Routing?

Dec 8, 2011

I have a quick query which i need ratified before proceeding.  I have the following scenario -
 
Two Cisco 3750v2 switches with stackwiseISP allocated block of /26 (64 addresses)8 customers each with a VLAN and SVIInternet facing VLAN and SVIDefault route to ISP router Lets say the ISP has given me the network range 10.10.10.0/26 (we'll assume this is routable on the internet for the purposes of this example) and a default gateway to the internet of 10.10.10.1 within this range.  I have configured a public facing VLAN as follows -
 
VLAN 300
name PUBLIC
 int VLAN 300
IP Address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.252
 
I have then created a default route as follows -
 
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0  10.10.10.1
 
With this configured, the switch can successfully route upstream to the internet with no problems.  I have then moved onto the customers and depending on what service they have purchased, I have subnetted the 10.10.10.0/26 range into smaller subnets.  See as follows -
 
Customer A - 10.10.10.4/30
Gateway IP - 10.10.10.5
Useable IPs - 10.10.10.6
 Customer B - 10.10.10.8/29
Gateway IP - 10.10.10.9
Useable IPs - 10.10.10.10 - 10.10.10.14
 
This continues for each customer depending on how many IP's the have purchased.  I have then assigned these IP ranges to a customer VLAN and SVI as follows -
 
Customer A
 VLAN 10
name CUST-A-VLAN
 int VLAN 10
ip address 10.10.10.5 255.255.255.252

[code].....
 
It is then up to the customer as to what equipment they use and how they NAT or firewall their internal networks.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - Only Allow Specific Traffic To VLAN

Oct 10, 2012

Have a quick question regarding inter-vlan routing on a 3750.  Overview of network is ISP --> ASA --> 3750 (acting as my core and default gw).  I have 5 vlan interfaces on my 3750, all w/ 192.192.x.x subnets, a 6th w/ 192.168.100.x, and a 7th w/ 192.168.200.x.  I have enabled "ip routing" on the switch and can successfully ping from subnet A to subnet B as long as both devices are using the correct DG for their vlan, which is the switch.  I have a few ports that are trunked as well that go to ESX hosts which break out the vlans according to the subnet the vm should be attached to.  The ASA is set to nat internal traffic for all the vlans.
 
Now my question:  short of applying an ACL to each vlan interface to block traffic from other 192.192.x.x subnets is there a better way to accomplish this?  I want my 192.168.10.x subnet to be able to reach all the subnets, but don't want 192.192.10.x to be able to talk to 192.192.20.x for example.  I was thinking to create an acl like this:
 
access-list 120 permit ip 192.192.10.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 120 deny ip 192.192.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.192.10.0 0.0.0.255access-list 120 permit ip any 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.192.10.0 0.0.0.255
 
and then applying this to the interface for the appropriate vlan. 

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 MAC Table Missing For One VLAN

Jan 18, 2012

I have one VLAN on a 3750 where I do not see any MAC addresses even though it is in use.  This is an unrouted VLAN between a WLC on a port- channel /LAG and an access port to an ASA for guest traffic.  When I do a show MAC add I get nothing for VLAN 60 (guest DMZ) but all other VLANs seem to be OK. Spanning tree is not showing TC counters incrementing either. 
 
I also was told when put a port on this VLAN the laptop did not get a DHCP address form the ASA, but the wireless guest clients are working fine.  I can see the DHCP leases and ARP entries in the ASA and the ASA ARP in the WLC so some traffic is passing fine.  I'm not onsite right now so troubleshooting is all remote which limits some options.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: VLAN On 3com 2952 And 3750?

Jul 1, 2012

I have setup both Vlans on 3com and cisco. but it seems they cant talk to each other.ive setup both on trunking mode?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 No Spanning Tree Vlan

Feb 29, 2012

I have a 3750 switch which has the command 'spanning-tree vlan **'.  I am struggling to remove this command, as this particular VLAN is one I want to distribute across our network.I have so far, set the switch to VTP Transparent mode and removed the VLAN from the database, this removes the command.  If I then put the switch back to VTP client mode (or manually add the VLAN, while in in VTP transparent mode) then the command comes back.  Submitting the command 'spanning-tree vlan **' command has no affect.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 / VLAN Is Locally Shut

Apr 24, 2011

One of my VLANS on my 3750 gives a status of act/lshut. I've tried no shut commands on the interface to no avail. From my reading it seems like this means the VLAN is active but shut down locally.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cannot Set Route-map On Interface Vlan In Non Default Vrf On 3750

Dec 12, 2012

Cannot set route map on interface vlan. which in non default vrf on Cisco 3750.IOS c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE.bin sdm prefer route in enable ip vrf users rd 200:0 route-target export 200:0 route-target import 200:0 interface Vlan201 description Users 1 ip vrf forwarding users ip address 10.31.76.1 255.255.252.0 ip helper-address 10.31.4.57 route-map fromuser permit 10 match ip address fromuser set ip next-hop 10.31.128.155 When I enter "ip policy route-map fromuser" to interface Vlan 201 I heve the message:
 
% Remove VRF configuration from interface Vlan201 first

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3750-X Not Showing VLAN As Active

Apr 14, 2013

I have installed a Catalyst 2960-S and a 3750-X-12S and I am trying to setup a VLAN 51 for some VoIP phones. I have added the VLAN as an interface on both switches, but the 3750 is not showing VLAN 51 as active when i do a show vlan. Also, it omitts showing Gi1/0/1 & Gi1/0/3 which are uplinks to 2960-S switches plugged in and working on VLAN1.
 
Catalyst3750SFP#show vlan
VLAN Name                             Status    Ports
---- -------------------------------- --------- -------------------------------
1    default                          active    Gi1/0/2, Gi1/0/4, Gi1/0/5

[Code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Configure Inter Vlan On 3750 Series?

Jun 25, 2012

I have 3750 series with GIBICs ports I want to create 10 vlans with its sub-net and enable all vlans to access internet.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2911 / 3750 - Allow Email To Two Servers On Different Vlan?

Mar 24, 2012

I have a network with the following structure
 
internet ---- cisco2911 ----cisco3750 --- internal lan
 
I have two email servers on different vlan
 
192.168.0.1    ----- 1.1.1.2 (public ip)
10.1.1.65  ---- 1.1.1.3 (public ip)
 
Before these servers were directly connected to the internet with two nics (Nightmare, I know). The Public IP on internet facing NIC and private ip on LAN facing nic. I'm in the process of changing this.I'm able to access internet from my vlans and also able to send emails but cannot receive emails on these servers.
 
My router congif is as follows:

Building configuration... 
Current configuration : 6234 bytes
!
version 15.1
no service pad
service tcp-keepalives-in
service tcp-keepalives-out
service timestamps debug datetime msec localtime show-timezone
service timestamps log datetime msec localtime show-timezone

[code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6513 To 3750 Vlan Trunk Connectivity

Nov 8, 2011

Currently we have a 6513 core (running IOS and doing limited routing) with VLAN Trunking to about a dozen 3560 edge switches, with various VLANs going to each of the edge switches.  All works well.  We are downsizing and replacing the 6513 core with a 3750G stack.  We have the stack up and running in the lab, and want to slowly (as we move floors) migrate all of the edge switching to the 3750 stack. 
 
The plan is to connect the 3750 stack to the 6513, then slowly migrate the edge switches to the stack (from the 6513).  I would like to put in place 4 x 1GB trunk links between the 6513 and the 3750 stack before I start moving edge switches to ensure adequate bandwidth.  Once all of the edge switches are on the new 3750 stack, I will start to decommission the 6513.
 
What is the best way to configure the links between the cores (old 6513 and new 3750 stack)?  I can easily get the edge switches configured to the 3750, but am worried about the core links.  I really want to avoid having to perform an all-at-once cutover of the cores.  Another question is when do I try and migrate the VTP server role from the 6513 to the 3750 stack?  I could simply make everything transparent, and ditch server-based VTP, as we rarely change or creat VLANs.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Ping From Vlan Interfaces On 3750 Switch

May 27, 2013

 I'm having some trouble getting my head round the following but I think it's routing related?
 
I have a Cisco 3750 switch with the following configured:

interface Vlan1
ip address 192.168.0.223 255.255.254.0
no ip route-cache

[Code].....
 
The 3750 is connected to a firewall which handles the routing.  From the 3750 I can only ping remote networks from the vlan1 interface not from vlan6,8 or 10 i.e ping 10.34.37.101 (remote network) source 192.168.0.223 (vlan1) works but ping 10.34.37.101 source 10.74.10.1 (vlan10) does not?  I can ping 10.34.37.101 from computers on the various vlans but not from the 3750 it self.
 
I looked at setting a default gateway for the various vlan interfaces

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Configure Inter-vlan On Catalyst 3750

Dec 20, 2012

My architecture is the same as show on the link with some difference.I use the router 1841 for inetrnet connexion instead of 7200VXR, this router 1841 is connected on the catalyst 3750 port G1/0/1.I use catalyst 2960 instead of catalyst 2950 or 2948.I use ASA 5510 for conexion on remote branche(I have 5 remote site), This ASA is connected on the catalyst 3750 port G1/0/37
 
Result of the test:

-I can ping devices in the same Vlans
-I can ping devices in different VLANs
-I can ping all device from the catalyst 3750
 
I cannot ping the router 1841 or ASA 5510 from the any devices (computer)The gateway of each computer is the correpondant VLAN IP address configured on the catalyst 3750.Why I cannot ping the router 1841 or ASA 5510 from the any devices (computer)

View 19 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - VLAN Flapping Error Message

Sep 15, 2012

I recently upgraded my network to have two 3750x core, one interface on the Cisco is connecting to a Net gear switch via a fiber converter. I am keep getting the vlan flapping error message in my log as below.
 
003396: Sep 17 01:46:16.328: %SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: Host 5c0e.8ba7.0a5c in vlan 2 is flapping between port Gi2/0/15 and port Gi2/0/13
003397: Sep 17 01:46:19.843: %SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: Host 5c0e.8ba7.0a5c in vlan 2 is flapping between port Gi2/0/15 and port Gi2/0/13
003400: Sep 17 01:49:58.769: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet2/0/17, changed state to down
[Code] .....
 
After my research i think this is a looping issue but I'm unsure how to address it.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - Cannot Enable PBR On A VLAN WCCP Enabled

Jan 3, 2012

I would like to apply a policy-based route on one of our L3 switches (Cisco 3750) to change the next-hop of a couple of servers only. The VLAN where those servers reside got WCCP enabled on it. When I want to apply the route-policy to that VLAN interface it doesn't let me. When I try to apply the same policy to a VLAN interface without WCCP it does work. Is there any Cisco IOS limitations that would prevent me from doing that?
 
Configuration:
route policy config: 
access-list 70 permit ip host x.x.x.x (server IP)
route-map PBR1 permit 10

[Code].....

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved