Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4506 - Error When Try To Build Eatherchannel Trunk
Feb 28, 2013
when try to build etherchannel trunk in between this unit C4510 with the other C4506 Physically can see that the slot 2 shows red light. I had tried reinsert the line card of slot 2 still show same error below when show log,
after swap current line card at slot 2 with new line card show me need to "try reinserting module" ? What happening on this? If this what we did now is we already assume line card is not an issue, could this be a chassis proble? Hope to get your feedback sooner possible.
%C4K_CHASISS-3-LINECARDSEEPROMREADFAILED : FAILED TO READ module 2's serial eeprom , try reinserting module
#sh module
Chassis Type : WS-C4510R+E
Power consumed by backplane : 40 Watts
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
---+-----+--------------------------------------+------------------+-----------
1 48 10/100/1000BaseT EEE (RJ45) WS-X4748-RJ45-E CAT1644L4UZ
3 48 10/100/1000BaseT EEE (RJ45) WS-X4748-RJ45-E CAT1644L4N8
4 12 10GE SFP+ WS-X4712-SFP+E CAT1645L2X8
5 4 Sup 7-E 10GE (SFP+), 1000BaseX (SFP) WS-X45-SUP7-E CAT1645L47F
6 4 Sup 7-E 10GE (SFP+), 1000BaseX (SFP) WS-X45-SUP7-E CAT1646L04B
7 12 10GE SFP+ WS-X4712-SFP+E CAT1645L2U4
8 12 10GE SFP+ WS-X4712-SFP+E CAT1645L2VC
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 25, 2012
Need to limit the amount of bandwidth a specific VLAN can use on a 802.1q trunk port. Situation is that we have a pair of Catalyst 4506 switches which have 802.1q trunk ports into a Checkpoint Firewall, this in turn is connected to a managed WAN router (to which I can't apply a QoS policy).If the 4506 was routing the traffic it would be easy to setup a class-map to match the IP traffic and then QoS the traffic, but the VLAN in question is trunked directly into the firewall (no L3/IP presence on the 4506 next hop for all clients on this VLAN is the firewall).What I need to do is restrict any traffic from this specific VLAN to 10Mbps on the uplink to the Checkpoint Firewall so it cannot impact the onward WAN.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 24, 2012
Current Situation:We are able to reach server IP -10.203.206.40 from our 4948 switch vlan 10.30.1.0/24 through the Layer 3 interface between 4506 and 4948.
Requirements
==========
1) Now we would like to add one more L3 interface between 4506 & 4948 for redundancy purpose.
2) Make available Vlan 540 in 4948 from 4506... need to create two trunk links between 4506 & 4948 and allow vlan 540.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Mar 18, 2013
I am taking only undersize errors on catalyst 3750 trunk interface (attached some outputs)...the other end is a 4500 switch and the interface is clean..can this be related to any bug ? this is my root port and often leading to trouble sometimes STP BPDUs transportation are affected..
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2012
we recently aquired a managed services job and have to do a overhaul of the vlan configs and have a whole dozen WC2948G's trunk between a set of ports as well as trunk out a LAG channel setup to non cisco equipment. the deal is the lacp-channel works properly on both ends but no routing of vlans between ports and between the lag trunk are working.
theres alot of settings in the config and im planning on clearing it and starting from scratch but before i do i want to know where my problem lies.
[code]...
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2012
Any configuration example to build a vpc b/w 5ks and 7ks? i have total 4 links between them . If not, I am assuming to have the following config for the port-channels:- (Provided the vpc domain is configured).
N5k1 and 2:
int eth1/10-11
channel-group 10 mode active
switchport mode trunk
int po10
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan a-d
[code]....
So, its basically vpc 10 that has 4 physical links b/w the vpc domain of 7ks and vpc domain of 5ks.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2012
I have to use 9 Cisco 300 series switches to build a new network. I will use one of them (core switch) in L3 for routing between Vlans (3 Vlans) and the others in L2. Is there a software to centralized all switches configuration, operation and monitoring?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2012
I plan to build improved redundancy in to my LAN by stacking two 3750s and teaming pairs of NICs on my Dell PowerEdge servers, with each cable of the pair going to a different switch.In my mind this provides redundancy for the NICs and the switches. Does this configuration will work, and also what type of teaming is supported, as I was planning to have one NIC active and one standby, but can I run this configuration with both NICs in the team as active with load balancing?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 17, 2013
My management has tasked me to give them a high level overview of the different switching we can choose for our new building.
This is what I know so far.4 Closets, each closet has 450 ports,One MDF room that is will contain one UCS Chassis and a Nimble iSCSI SAN.
I am working on the spreadsheet and it looks like this (Not totally filled):
2960s3560x3750x45064510Approx cost (Each, 48PORT, POE+, 10G uplink, Dual PS, IP BASE)
6K7K8K45K75KMax Capacity192432432192384Backplane speed206464520520ProLeast ExpensiveStackable to 9Stackable to 9ProDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSProLayer 3 opt
Layer 3 optDual SupsDual SupsConExpensiveExpensiveConNo Dual PSConLayer 2 OnlyCannot stack more than 4
For the MDF I would like to use 2 Nexus 5548's with FEX's, and the layer 3 daughter board. For the IDF's I was thinking of two 4010's.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Dec 19, 2011
I am implementing a guest wireless network to work alongside my internal network. The guest network will use the existing switching network and will be separated by VLANs. I have the ASA set so that traffic can get to it and out to the Internet. I can set up a workstation on the same VLAN as my guest network and can route inside my network (strictly doing this for testing purposes). Where I am having problems is with the Catalyst 4506 switches and the ip routing. I had two separate "ip route" statements defined on my switches.
ip route 10.200.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.200.2.254
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.100.100.254
I have discovered that the traffic is always following the default route despite the fact that my IP address on my test workstation falls in the 10.200.2.x network. I was looking at documentation and found that it is possible to set up policy-based routing on the core switches. Can you have two "ip route" statements defined like this to segreate traffic or do I have to use PBR for routing (or a combination) in this case? If I define PBR then how does that impact my existing routing? I need to make sure that I can still route the existing traffic while I'm configuring this change.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 27, 2012
We have 2 sites, each with 2 x 4506 switches which will be connected togther using an etherchannel. The switches will provide access ports for client devices and will be configured with HSRP to provide gateway redundancy. SW1 will be HSRP active.2 metro ethernet links will be installed in each site which will connect back to our HQ sites. OSPF will be used over the backbone to provide resiliency and to allow shortest path routing to each HQ and to prevent traffic over the HQ to HQ link.
The 4506 will be trunked togther with an SVI for providing OSFP adjacency.For the traffic flow from SW2 to HQ2, traffic will hit SW1 and then route back to SW2 and then to HQ2. Is this the best way to do this? Should a second link be connected between switches just for routing or should something like GLBP be used?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 7, 2013
I'm looking at the possibility of purchasing a few 3750 to build a switch stack to replace my current core and access switches. I'd like for the stack to support server, SAN, and user traffic, as well as provide simple switch management, redundancy, and failover. I've also been looking at the 4500, 6500, and Nexus series switches (although the Nexus switches maybe a bit too much for my network).
My current environment consists of 3560's as the core/distribution/access switches, a mixture of Hyper-V and VMWare environments (although we're slowly migrating to Hyper-V), an HP SAN (P4500), and about 100 users. Any issues going with the 3750's or have an alternative, more efficient solution?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2012
I have some questions in regards to network equipment I want re-utilize for my distribution layer in one of my buildings.The choices at the moment are:
OPTION 1.) 2x WS-3550-12G's (HSRP)
OPTION 2.) 1x WS-6509 with cards:
What option would be better from a performance aspect? We want to have network, voice, and wireless data go through this distribution layer switch(es).This is exisiting equipment I already have and can not buy anything else at the moment.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 31, 2012
CiscoSwitch1(4506) has 3 VLANs(12,13,14) and Switch2(4948) has 3 different VLANs(22,23,24) and IP routing has been enabled in both switches with SVI interfaces for each vlan. intervlan routing is works fine.Now there is a requirement to connect these switches together. Vlan 12 on the Cisco switch 4506 has to be made available from vlan 22 from Switch2(4948). basically Vlan 12 is having a multicast source (225.0.0.0 & 226.0.0.0) which should be accessabile from vlan 22 of cisco switch 4948.I got 2 ideas
1) Create a trunk between these switches and configure L2 vlan(12) in cisco 4948...i know theoritically it should work but what my concern is Ip routing enabled in both switches will it create any issues? is it a gud solution to this requirement?
2) Create a separate IP network on the ports connecting to both switches and set up routes to the networks.ex- console(config)#ip route 192.168.10.10 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.1.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Mar 8, 2013
I am configuring multicast in a environment where I have a 4506 at each site (4 total) and a 6506 as the core. Each 4506 is connected via layer 3 to the 6506. I have a mix of 3560s, 3548s, and 2960s connected to the 4506s and the 6506 via layer 2 trunk
I have multiple multicast sources and hosts communicating at a time (multiple cameras sending video / multiple computers receiving video). So this is not a scenario where there is 1 sender and many receivers. This would be many senders (~50) and some receivers (~10)
Sample Diagram:
->3560
|
6506 --> 4506 --> 3548
| |
| --> 2960
|
4506 --> 2960
|
-->3548
I configured ip multicast-routing on each of the 4506s and on the 6506. IGMP snooping is on by default on the 3560 and 2960 switches. CGMP is on by default on the 3548 switches.
I set up PIM sparse-dense mode and IGMP version 3 on each of the layer 3 interfaces for the 4506s and 6506 where they connect and on each VLAN that is sending or receiving multicast. Multicast is working throughout the network, however I am looking to verify the configuration as I scale this out to more clients on the network.
#1 - Is it correct to us sparse-dense mode in this configuration?
#2 - Do I need to configure a rendezvous points using AUTO-RP? (ip pim send-rp-announce INTERFACE scope TTL). Not sure here if I need to designate this and what to choose. Right now I do not have this and it is working, but documentation seems to infer that I need to designate this.
#3 - Is there any other configuration settings I should be considering? I hard to find real world configurations of multicast as examples or people that know multicast routing well.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 4, 2013
I am currently running a 4506 with a sup V engine. I have purchased a sup 7 engine. Is there a guide on how to perform this task. I am sure I need to do an IOS update as well.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 6, 2012
We have sup engine 6L(WS-X45-SUP6L-E) on two 4506 switch. both switches connected in LAN (HSRP primary and Secondary).
We are going to replace it with Sup7LE. What is the best procedure to get this done with minimal outage?Any other important thing to be noted ? Note : We have Lincence for SUP 7LE
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2012
We are attempting to PXE boot from clients obtaining their DHCP lease information from DHCP pools configured on our 4506. The PXE server, and the client are configured in separate VLANs. We have configured option 66 to point to the PXE server IP address, and the bootfile option to point to the PXE boot configuration filename. On the client side SVI, we also have configured the ip helper-address command to point to the PXE server (which also acts as another DHCP server for redundancy).
The PXE boot continuously fails stating it is unable to find the configuration file. If we remove the DHCP pool from the 4506, and allow the client to receive their DHCP lease info from the secondary server (Windows 2k8 - same server as PXE server), they PXE boot with no issues.
We have no problem obtaining DHCP info, just completion of the PXE process.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2013
Does SUP 7E is comatible with IOS? It came with IOS-XE preloaded and there are no IOS software listed under downloads.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2012
Yesterday I've faced a Problem that is not letting me boot with the new IOS.
Actually I'm planning upgrade IOS which supports SSH. As part of plan I've downloaded the new IOS image and uploaded via TFTP server to the switch.
After uploading to the switch. I've verified image and MD5 hash also. Everthing is fine. Then after I set the boot variable for the newly uploaded Image.
When I'm rebooting the Device it is not taking the new IOS. It's booting with the OLD image. Even It's not showing any error message while rebooting (ACTIVITY FILE ATTACHED FOR YOUR REFERENCE) I can't take risk by deleting the old IOS.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2013
I have 4506 with below sup, my requirement is to enable netfolw , but as i came to know that it is not supported in this sup, is there any additional option which can be explored to get the netflow working without replacing sup.
Card Type Model
-------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------------
Sup 6-E 10GE (X2), 1000BaseX (SFP) WS-X45-SUP6-E
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 26, 2012
I have a site that is very dense, but not high throughput. I have 4x48 port switches all 3560 and 1 2851 router. The switches are pretty much full to the brim but the site is never completly lit, they just like to move around a lot. However i wanted to provide this site with as much redundnace as possible. So my first thought was to build redundant pathing with the switches so that they could loose a switch and not have a single point of failure. So therefore I built a ring. SW1 to SW2, SW2 to SW3, SW3 to SW4, SW4 to SW1. To make this even more redundant against port hardware failure, i used two uplinks for each and built an etherchannel. is it good practice to use Etherchannel and Spanning Tree together?So i now have a good redundant LAN switching topology. I have multiple VLANs at the site so I am using Rapid-PVST. I did not set priorities on the switches as I don't think that is really truly necessary, but correct me if I am wrong!Ok so next step is to make sure that my WAN connection for all of these switches is redundant. I have a 2851 router, with 1 of the built in interfaces dedicated to our ethernet hand-off WAN connection (MPLS in this case using BGP routing). The other would be used as an uplink. I also got an additional card for the Router so that i can have redudant local LAN connections. I then built up some IRB bridges so that I could uplink the Router to SW1 and SW3. Is it good practice to use IRB Bridging on a Router to provide redundancy?So at this site i have the first part running, and it works pretty well but I have had 1 strage issue, which has to do with after a failure and re-convergence of spanning-tree, it seems that DHCP starts failing to work. I actually had to go into each of my switches make a dummy VLAN interface and put on helper-addresses to get them to work. They are not L3 switches (programatically speaking) so they should just forward the broadcast packet onto the router, which DOES have the helper-addresses programmed,Also at another site I have the bridge router setup configured, just without so many switches, and no etherchannel between the switches. This seems to work flawlessly, but the site is very small so performance issues would be difficult to spot since they are just thin-clients coming back to a Citrix server over a single T1.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2010
We have just purchased and installed a 4506-E chassis. It contains a supervisor, two POE blades and 3 non-poe blades. Version is 12.2(53)SG1. Anyhoo, one of the ports isn't providing power to an IP phone. We can plug the phone into any of the other POE ports and it works fine. Is there a way to test an idividual port for POE problems? What could the problem be? The port works for normal data but will not provide power.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Dec 4, 2011
We ordered the wrong part number for a Cisco 4506 non-E chassis, the part number is: WS-X4624-SFP-E and the device is showing "Unsupported module"; What would the part number be for the non-E? WS-X4448-GB-SFP,Catalyst 4500 48-Port 1000Base-X (SFPs Optional) ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2013
i'm desperately trying to get LACP working over a dot1q Tunnel. The "Service Provider" Switches are two 4506-E Switches with SUP7-E connected via a 10G Link, running on cat4500e-universalk9.SPA.03.03.00.SG.151-1.SG
sample config:
dot1q tag vlan native
interface GigabitEthernet3/1
switchport access vlan 2001
[Code].....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 8, 2012
a 6509 and a 4506 with 2, 1gb interfaces in a portchannel. Bring it up and everything is fine. Save the config and reload either switch and the interfaces stay in Not Connected state. Either doing a No Shut or a physical unplug the SFP and plug it back in will bring it up with no issues. Interfaces do not go into Err Disabled state they stay in Not Connected like there is no fiber plugged into it. No error mesages in the log. The Just the Interface is now up.Both are running very new code,
6509 - s2t54-ipservicesk9-mz.SPA.150-1.SY1.bin ( 15.0.(1)SY1 )
4506 - Version 03.02.00.XO
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 12, 2012
I have "inherited" a Catalyst 4506 with IOS version 12.2(20)EWA1 and Supervisor IV already installed. We recently purchased a second Supervisor IV and I am looking to install this second supervisor for redundancy. Is there anything special with installing a second supervisor or so I just physically install the new supervisor and the IOS will automatically set everything up?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2012
I have a setup with two Cat 4506E working as a HA,I used a bundle 4Gb interfaces working as ether-channel,I'm facing a problem with DHCP pools on the both SW's,There is no problem if I use the pools on one sw,But when I but the pool on both sw's then I faced a lot of conflict IP in the DHCP pools,How can setup a real DHCP redundancy on both SW's,
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2013
My inherited network has a Cisco Catalyst 4506 with a WS-X4124FX–MT fiber card that connects to twelve Cisco 2950 switches over 62.5 micron multimode fiber at 100 Mbps. I do not know my run lengths (or even where the conduits run), but the furthest switches are well over a thousand feet from the server room. Any appropriate test equipment to provide this information soon.
We are looking at upgrading the main switch to a Catalyst WS-C4507+E with two WS-X4712-SFP+E cards and the closets to Cisco 2960S-48TD-L switches. Assuming this is a reasonable move, my question is about choosing the appropriate SFP’s for our current and future needs.
I am aware that 62.5 micron multimode fiber is the least favorable for extended lengths, but I will not be in a position to replace it for at least a year. If I purchase 10 Gbps modules, like the SFP-10G-SR or SFP-10G-LRM, can they “throttle down”, either automatically or by setting a parameter, to communicate at slower speeds over distances that exceed their 10 Gbps maximum link lengths on multimode fiber?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2013
We want to permit certain mac addresses on the cat 4506 switch wherein only those mac addresses will get access to network.
Configuration Planned: For testing purpose we have created mac access list on cat 4506 and deny laptop mac address in this access list. The mac access group is applied to the port where the laptop is connected to cat 4506.Even after applying the mac access group on the port, the laptop is able to ping the vlan ip of cat 4506 [code]
laptop with ip address 192.168.10.2/24 connected to port 2/1 is able to ping 192.168.10.1 even after applying the mac access-group
Note-we have tested same configuration on cat 3560 and its working fine. We apply the mac access-group command on interface and clear the arp-cache and we are not able to ping vlan interface ip. The moment we remove the mac access-group,ping starts again.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 30, 2011
I have three 4506 switches with vlan 4 set as the management vlan. Switch 1 is connected to switch 2 and switch 3.
I can access switch 1 and 2 using telnet from the management vlan and both switches reply to pings. But from switch 1 or 2 I cannot ping or telnet switch 3. If I plug into switch 3 and I can ping and telnet switch 3 but not switches 1 or 2.
It is as if the management vlan 4 is not being passed to/from switch 1 and 3. The configs for the uplinks from switch 1 to 2 and 3 are the same. And the configs for switches 2 and 3 look the same apart from the port settings.
I have over 40 vlans running all that work fine between all the switches.
View 28 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2011
I have one computer connected to the 4506 that management does not want this PC to have access to anything on our network except our DHCP server and the one printer that resides on our network. I created an extended access list as follows. Our network is the 10.10.x.x and the external addresses the PC needs to access is 11.1.x.x. Once this PC is rebooted, it is unable to access DHCP to get the needed IP address it bounces back to a 169.x.x.x address and stops working.
Extended IP access list 2000
permit tcp host 10.10.200.242 host 11.1.200.1 (gateway)
permit tcp host 10.10.200.242 host 11.1.2.151 eq smtp (access from the pc to external server for smtp)
permit tcp host 10.10.200.242 host 11.1.2.149 eq 5721 (access from the pc to external server for remote access)
[ code]...
Then I applied the access-group 2000 on the interface the PC is connected to. What am I missing for DHCP to work and for this PC to always get the ip address that is reserved?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 4, 2013
I am running HSRP on three 4506 switches..S1(active) S2( standby) and S3(listen)..S1 is active for all the vlansRight now, I wanted to make S3 active for two vlans: vlan 10 and 19What would be the impact to the end hosts?Also, can you tell me why the arp is not syncing for all the three devices? [code]
View 4 Replies
View Related
