I have reconfigured the FEX numbers attached to a Nexus 5548 running on NXOS5.2 If I do show running-config the interfaces are not there anymore. But if I do show startup-config the old Fex interfaces still shows up. I did try write erase then saved the running-config and its still there.
View 1 RepliesI have a Cisco 850 router that whas having problems getting an ip address via DHCP. I did some stuff on it but that didn't work, so I rebooted the router to go back to my last saved startup config. When I turned it back on and connected t othe CLI console I got the "Would you like to enter the initial configuration dialogue?" message. Thinikng I just forgot to save anything to the startup config I went through the initial set up again and made sure to save everything to the startup config. After going through the intial config and setting up a vlan to assign DHCP to clients I saved the config and rebooted, upon reboot and connecting to the CLI console I got the same "Would you like to enter the initial configuration dialogue?" message. Tryign the setup once more and making sure everything was saved to startup config I rebooted again just to make sure the changes would stick, and sure enough they didn't. Whay is the config not saving to the startup config?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI messed up the IOS on the flash of CISCO881-SEC-K9. On reboot it booted to ROMMON which allowed me to tftp up a working IOS c880data-universalk9-mz.151-4.M3.bin. Unfortunately somewhere in my playing around the default startup configuration factory loaded on the routerhas been erased. I can load a new a config on the device but as I'm using the router to learn its useful to have the original config load when I factory reset the device. What is the factory start up config?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have two 5548s as core. 8 FEXs are multihomed (advanced vPC topology?) to both the cores.Suppose, I have to configure a bunch of ports on the FEXs, say Eth101/1/10 - 20. I would login to the first core and apply the configs.
My question is - do I have to do the same on the second core also? Or would the first core replicate the stuff to the second core? I know about port-profiles/CFS and such. But, without that would it automatically sync to second core?
For testing purpose, I went to Core 1 Eth101/1/10 and put a description "TEST". Wrote the config. After 5 minutes logged into second core and did show run Eth101/1/10. But, the description "TEST" didn't show up there.
Also, doing sh run on any FEX port is faster on one of the cores and very slow on second core... all the FEXs have 20 GB uplink to core 1 & 2 (so total 40GB in vPC, max pinning 1)
I was wondering if I can force catalyst 2960 to skip startup config stored in NVRAM and boot with no config everytime it is powered. I tried to find it on google and in cisco white papers but still no luck. I found only commands that begin with "set boot config-register ... ", but switch acts like it does not know these commands.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have an 877W router that I would like to have a 2nd pre-configured backup for. I was thinking of getting another 870 series (probably an 877) router, as the more expensive wireless option is not actually required. Am I right to assume that I could simply copy the contents of my current config.txt file onto the second router?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm facing a problem where certain port on my swtich keep grant and remove poe.
Nov 12 07:02:43.639: %ILPOWER-5-POWER_GRANTED: Interface Gi1/0/18: Power granted
Nov 12 07:02:44.399: %ILPOWER-5-IEEE_DISCONNECT: Interface Gi1/0/18: PD removed
[Code].....
I had a problem during setup of a new module N7K-M148GS-11 into a Nexus 7000 10-Slot chassis.The module was powered-dn and removed by platform with the following message: [code]
Do I need to upgrade nx-os? There is a workaround?
I have a problem with dscp preservation on a WS-C3750X-48 catalyst; in my little diagram, his name will be SW2, so I have this:SW1 <-> SW2 <-> RT1. some phone connected to SW1 mark with dscp EF (46) the voice traffic.The "mls qos" was enabled on SW1 and SWt. The interlink switch ports has the "mls qos trust dscp" option, the phone port and the router port also.And the problem is I can see the dscp marking on the SW2 when I span the voice vlan on this switch but the dscp was removed ( DSCP set to 0) on the router port ( span on the router port for look )If I made also a packet capture on the router RT1, I see the DSCP was effectively reset to zero.If I disable the "mls qos" on SW2, of course all is fine and the dscp was preserved and forwarded to the router. [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am going to be putting an SG200-08 (8 port switch) inside a 2U rack mount chassis. To enhance cooling I thought I would remove the outer case. Are there, or would there be any issues with using the switch with the cover removed?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have Nexus 5548UP, Version version 5.0(3)N2(2b), with a flat configured network. Customer has put several IP subnets on one Vlan. In one subnet is an Siemens SPS wich connects to a Server. This SPS is not reachable since I send a ping from the N5k, then everything works fine. Sniffering that port no arp requests from the N5k are captured. That hapens with every device (Siemens SPS) in the network. Every other clients and server are working fine and there are no problems.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to get our DCNM to discover the 5548. When I put my credentials for that appliance. I get this error .Failed Device x.x.x.x OS Version 5.1(3)N1(1) is not supported . The DCNM version we have is 5.2(1)S74.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a Nexus 5548 Recently restart itself for no reason I ran the command:
sh system reset-reason
----- reset reason for Supervisor-module 1 (from Supervisor in slot 1) ---
1) At 469203 usecs after Sat May 11 14:02:07 2013
Reason: Reset triggered due to HA policy of Reset
Service: eth_port_sec hap reset
Version: 5.1(3)N1(1a)
sh processes log details
Start type: SRV_OPTION_RESTART_STATELESS (23)
Death reason: SYSMGR_DEATH_REASON_FAILURE_SIGNAL (2)
Last heartbeat 6.09 secs ago
RLIMIT_AS: 189894144
System image name: n5000-uk9.5.1.3.N1.1a.bin
I've been searching in Google/Cisco about the eth_port_sec hap reset and cannot find any reason, just something about the same error but in different technology:
[URL]
CSCub36000 #SNMP polling on eth_port_security objects no longer causes an eth_port_sec hap reset.I just to want to be sure, is the same reason...Or do you know something than can cause it on a Nexus Switch?
We have just purchased and installed the L3 daughter card for our 5548UPs and have also installed the L3 Enterprise Services pkg. The problem is, I cannot enable the EIGRP feature even though we have the Ent Svc lic. After doing a little more research, I see that the Lan Base lic is required to enable the L3 card and many of the L3 features (the card is currently in an "offline" state).
From what I have read on this board, the Lan Base lic is a free license that should be included with the L3 daughter card -- however, Cisco licensing will not issue me that license without a sales order (even though a Nexus engineer said it was included, the licensing group will not issue with an official sales order). Well, our vendor ordered the card and the Ent Svcs lic but for some reason we were never sent a PAK for the LAN Base lic.
I have a Catalyst 3560-X PoE that suddenly stopped working. I plugged in via console and below is the output I received. It scrolls constantly and I am unable to enter ROMMON mode or stop it from scrolling. I've read of a possible problem with the IOS version but I'm unable to verify due to not being able to stop the scrolling.
Switch uptime is 4 minutes, 4 seconds
cisco WS-C3560X-24P (PowerPC405) processor (revision A0) with 262144K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FDO1522R2AY
[Code].....
I have manual Cisco 1812 (1811) Integrated Srvice Router Cabling and Installation in front of meI have Cisco 1811 connected to my laptop according to this manualI have Cisco SDM latest version installed on my laptopI have DHCP enabled on my laptopThe problem that my laptop can't get valid IP adreess from the router (see att. laptop_, laptop_2)
Which IP address I have to use in order to get access to router inrerface (see. SDM_1)?
using the 55xx as a L3 Distribution switch or even as a Core. By enabling the L3 features does it allow you enabled L3 SVI's for VLAN interfaces or are there interfaces on the daughter card that are used for routing instead?
View 5 Replies View RelatedThe Nexus 5548 is running 5.1.3.N2.1a and has the L3 daughter card (N55-D160L3)I have the EIGRP feature enabled. By the way, when doing a 'sh feature' four EIGRP features show up like this: [code] To create the L3 SVI, I go into config mode and attempt to type 'interface vlan 10'. but this doesn't work. These are the only options under the keyword 'interface':
- ethernet
- loopback
- mgmt
- port-channel
I must be missing something simple but can't seem to see what that is. What do I need to do in order to create an L3 SVI on this 5548?
I want to configure management for some Nexus 5548's?I wanted to manage the switches via an SVI. I have read the following document which gives details about the Management SVI but doesn't answer all questions.[URL]I am not running any layer 3 functionality on the switch, no layer3 license (which it mentions in the above link) Will I still be able to create a management SVI. I know I will need to enable the feature 'interface-vlan' to setup a Management SVI, does that require a license?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI encountered problem while trying to copy file from Nexus 5548 to my ftp server (proteus - 192.168.12.220 - the Nexus switch is able to resolve name proteus correctly to 192.168.12.220). See below the working and not working scenarios. I have serached through Cisco Bug Database but unable to find any related bug associated to this problem. This Nexus is running the following NX-OS version.
n5000-uk9-kickstart.5.1.3.N1.1a.bin
n5000-uk9.5.1.3.N1.1a.bin
Working (without specifying the username and full path)
[Code].....
We have two 5548 switches connected to a pair of 6509 running in VSS mode. I am trying to understand the benefit of having bridge assurance on the uplink ports.
If we have the command spanning-tree port type network enabled we cannot do a non disruptive upgrade. If there is bridge assurance on the uplink it warns you of this. Yet if I do not run bridge assurance on the uplinks I can do a upgrade without any disruption.
Why in god would I enable bridge assurance on this VPC link if I cannot do a non disruptive upgrade?
I need to upgrade the code on our two Nexus 5548's in order to facilitate the installation of a few FEX's, but due to the fact that seemingly all of my port-channels are in the STP DESG forwarding state, an ISSU upgrade is not possible. Everything connected directly to our 5548's are utilizing VPC's, including an HP Blade chassis, and several Netapp devices. If I follow the normal upgrade route, should I experience an outage, or should the secondary switch just continue passing traffic?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to setup SNMPv3 on a Nexus 5548. We are using SNMPv3 on 3750's without any issue, but haveing issues getting it setup on the Nexus.I have been using the following link for the setup following it line by line. [URL]The part that I'm having issues with is when I try to enforce SNMP message encryption on a per user basis. When I issue snmp-server user (username) enforcePriv, I get warning: unable to update CLI users database. reason: role does not exist grounp not found.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am using cisco Nexus5548 and trying to enter a snmp community, but it doesn't accept it. I enter a community name that is less than 32 characters, with symbols, numbers and letters.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am setting up a new environment with 2 5548's and some 2248TP-1GE Fex's and Im running into an issue. I have the peer link and peer-keepalive link that appear to be good. When I configure the fex and vpc for the fex manually on each switch without pre-provisioning the slot the fex comes online and everything appears to be good. I can see all the ineterfaces when doing a sh int br and the sh fex detail shows all good. When I do the exact same thing but pre-provision the slot the fex stays in an offline state. Ive tried disabling the port(s) connected to the fex while configuring everything then enabling them but same thing. [code]
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a 2232 dual homed to 2 5548's via a port-channel/ vpc. I have one 5548A and configure the port for the 2232 with a vlan, plug into that port and it doesn't come up (inactive). I go to 5548b (Primary) and configure the port and it comes up.
View 3 Replies View Relatedregarding PVLANs and the Nexus, my understanding is that we cannot configure Private VLANs on a FEX trunk port with a NX-OS release older than 5.1(3)N2(1) for the Nexus5548... Is there any known workaround for this limitation (appart from performing a SW upgrade)?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am working for an Air Force client and am adding a handful of 5548s into their network. My question is how Tacacs+ is configured. My hands are tied in regards to testing in an operational environment so I want to ensure the configs are correct prior to deployment/maintenance window and avoid any remote issues.
I have read the "Cisco Press - TACACS+" config guide and it was somewhat vague in regards to operational deployment.
My basic NX-OS configs are as follows:
- feature tacacs+- tacacs-server key 7 "002A52xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx8"- tacacs-server host 128.xx.xx.xx timeout 10- tacacs-server host 128.xx.xx.xx timeout 10- tacacs-server directed-request
When I try to set the following command string, aaa authentication login default group tacacs+ local, the NX-OS asks me the input a "server group name". There are no server groups configured. Do I need them? Can I get by without configuring a group name because the client probably will not.
The Cisco IOS devices are configured with normal aaa authentication/authorization parameters. Also, do the VTY ports default to sshv2 and the correct tacacs+ parameters with the "transport input ssh" command (not available)?
I am trying to install SFP-GE-T module on Nexus 5548UP Switch, but is giving the ‘SFP validation Failed’ error. The details of the switch is given below
Model : N5K-C5548UP-FA
The interface is configured with speed 1000 before inserting the module, still we are getting the same error. PFA logs for more details We have 8 Nos of SFP-GE-T modules , all are giving same error. We tried to insert the module on onboard as well as expansion module.
The same module is working fine on Cisco 3750X-24T-L Switch As per the Hardware installation guide , SFP-GE-T transciever is supported on N5K platform. Please extend your support in configuring SFP-GE-T module on N5K platform? We tried with SFP-GE-S module on the same switch , and the same is found working fine.
We have successfully peered two 5548UP switches together and separately we have successfully peered two 5596UP switches together. Works great and is our standard going forward for data center switching. I've been casting about Google and Cisco looking for an answer to this question:
Is it possible to have more than two 5500 class Nexus switches participate in a peered vPC configuration? For instance, can I connect a single FEX to four 5500 class switches in a vPC configuration? The question is more academic than actionable. Even if the answer is yes we probably wouldn't be in a position to implement something like this for a while.
don't have an option to connect a console cable to my cisco router. The usb to serial converter will not work in windows7 only on XP.have physical access to my 881 Cisco Router. If I remember correctly these routers have a default ip address. This router is brand new, out of the box. I am thinking I can access it with the correct IP via network instead of console.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI am trying to interconnect a pair of Nexus 5548 at adjacent sites, using 2 2960-S switches at each site, the reason being that the Multimode Fiber between the sites will only support 100mb and I need this up while I finish having SMF laid.
I have attached a diagram, just debating whether to use etherchannel or vPC - would like to hear some opinions...
Assume the interconnect between the 5548's needs to be 802.1q trunk
just a simple question. Is it possible to use a nexus 5548 UP switch as a layer 3 router between different vlans on the switch without the layer 3 card ? Or is there no 5548 as a router with the layer 3 card ?
View 2 Replies View Related