Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / Migrate VSS To New Set Of Chassis?

Dec 19, 2012

Currently have a pair of 6509 chassis setup with VSS. Only have the Sup and two line cards in each chassis. Would like to replace with a new pair of 6504E chassis. Is it possible to fail one chassis at a time and migrate to the new 6504E?

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 To 6509-E Chassis Upgrade?

Nov 21, 2011

I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:

     x3     48 ports
     x1     NAM
     x2     Sup720
     Running 12.2(18)SXF3
 
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade Of 6509 To 6509-E Chassis

Nov 21, 2011

I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:

x3     48 ports
x1     NAM
x2     Sup720

Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Sup 720 MSFC3 (HOT) Reload In 6509 Chassis

Mar 9, 2013

We have a backup sup 720 which has a 2 gigabit ethernet though port channel, to another chassis. Suddenly UDLD detected an error and got into err disable, then this err disable didn't let the interface set to DOWN, and created a switch loop, then our Supervisor reloaded. I'd like to know what could have caused this reload. In my opinion could have a been the switch loop, but also I've been checking from the output interpreter the show tech and might have been a bug, the only one that could match in IOS version 12.2(33)SXH, is this one: url...
 
We're going to disable err-disable next time I guess and recover the link manually, apart from that what could have made the sup for crash and reload?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Failed Supervisor On 6509 Chassis?

Jan 28, 2012

swapping out a failed supervisor card on a 6509 chassis?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade 6509-Chassis In VSS-Environment?

May 1, 2013

we have some pairs of 6509-VSS, which partially have old (no more officially supported) 6509-Chassis.All linecards in the VSS are the same (Sup 720-10GE-3C, 67XX).
 
We now bought some new 6509-E-Chassis and want to change the old chassis by the new ones in a ISSU manner, that means:
 
1. putting the partner, which chassis changes, in redundancy mode, switch it off, exchange chassis (old "Catalyst 6509", new "Catalyst 6509-E")

2. inserting the line-cards exactly in the same slots and connecting all cables

3. switch on the new chassis, witing to come up in VSS
 
I'm not sure of having to set the switch number for VSS (is that in the Sup?; configuration? or part of the chassis-memory?)
 
I've looked up cisco for some hints, but don't found anything.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 And 6509E Chassis Physical Characteristics

Oct 18, 2012

Are there any physical characteristic differences between the 6509 and 6509-E chassis?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 VSS Standby Chassis Reboot Trap

Dec 9, 2012

I have multiple 6509 vss switch. and i notice when the standby chassis reboot I didn't get any snmp trap, but I got when the active one reboot. my question is is there any mib out there for detecting and got a trap when standby reboot?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Is WS-SUP720-BASE Supported In 6509-E Chassis

Nov 29, 2010

I have a heck of a time finding this kind of information on the cisco site...Is the WS-SUP720-BASE line card a fully supported module in the 6509-E chassis?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - VSS Active Chassis Both FWSM And VSS Failover

Sep 25, 2012

Any have experience on triggered failover on VSS deployment with 1 VS-720-10G-3C in each chassis? I tried using "redundancy force-switchover" but after that the 20G VSL is flapping up & down and cannot be up normally, we got 1 FWSM in each chassis, any configuration need to fit in this kind deployment? BTW, if I shutdown the power source of VSS active chassis, both FWSM & VSS can failover normally.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Setting Up VRF-lite On Redundant 6509-E To Account For Chassis Failure?

May 15, 2013

setting up VRF-lite on redundant 6509-E chassis to account for chassis failure?   Let's say I have 2x 6509-Es configured with HSRP for 2 vlans, ServerA and ServerB.  So
 
6509-A#
!
interface Vlan10
description ServerA VLAN
ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
ip flow ingress
standby 1 ip 10.10.10.1
standby 1 priority 105

[code].....
 
I now need to create an environment where the Server VLANs can be provided for two customers and they need to be wholly separate.   On 6509-A, I make VRF CustomerA  and VRF CustomerB  and I assign Vlan10 to VRF CustomerA and Vlan20 to CustomerB.   Do I create the SAME VRFs on 6509-B with the same logic?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Series Switches Support VSS Active-Active Chassis

Feb 7, 2012

The 6509 Series Switches support the scenario VSS Active-Active Chassis, I would like to setup both switch's as one virtual switch but working at the same time, not with Active - Stand By Chassis.
 
My plans it to create PortChannel accross both Switches 6509 in order to have 2 links one connected to one slot/switch and the other connected to slot/switch in the second 6509 for servers redundancy.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Install Line Cards (WS-X4548-GB-RJ45 / Chassis WS-C4510R-E) On Chassis Ws-6504-E?

May 15, 2012

we need to install a line cards (WS-X4548-GB-RJ45, chassis WS-C4510R-E), on a chassis Ws-6504-E.where I can find information about compatibility?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: How To Migrate From Fixed Router To Vlan Routing On 4507

Feb 16, 2012

Any "best practices" or recommendations on how to migrate from a fixed router (3745) to vlan routing on Catalyst 4507 switches in order to minimize the disruption to the network.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Remove IPSec VPN SPA Module From 6509 Chassis?

Feb 29, 2012

Need to remove the IPSec VPN SPA module from the 6509 chassis. Does the module is hot swappable or does the 6509 need to be turned off prior to removal.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: To Migrate Switch AP From WLC To Other 3502

Feb 21, 2012

I try to remplace WLC  because the old wlc (7.0) is capacity full.but the AP (3502) do not "registered" to new WLC (7.3),If you have a idea, without make a reset factory to AP.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3502 - How To Migrate Switch AP From WLC To Other One

Mar 11, 2013

I try to replace WLC  because the old wlc (7.0) is capacity full. but the AP (3502) do not "registered" to new WLC (7.3). Don't want to make a reset factory to AP..

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: WLC 4402 LAG Connection To 2 Different Chassis Of 6509 VSS Switch

Mar 28, 2012

I have inherited a 6509 VSS switch system as the network core and have the task of ensuring proper redundancy and redesign of the directly connected data center devices.  One of the connected devices (WLC 4402) physically appears to be connected to both switches - the WLC is in the same rack as VSS-Chassis1 so I can trace the fiber from WLC port 1 to gi1/1/22, the other fiber from the WLC port 2 goes into the floor and presumably over to VSS-Chassis2 gi2/1/22 (there is fiber connected there, I have link lights on both sides, and the port channel, Po200, on the VSS switch which is configured on gi1/1/22 is also configured on gi2/1/22).  My question pertains to the CDP neighbor output I get on the VSS switch: (truncated to include just the WLC) [code]

So my question, arising at least partly from the apparently misleading CDP information, is this:  How can I confirm that the WLC is correctly dual homed to both core switches? (short of tracing the cable)  I ask because there are several other devices (not WLCs) that need to have the dual homed connections confirmed.I tried a layer 2 trace route but for all macs associated with the WLC, the trace abborts with the error "Device has Multiple CDP neighbours on destination port."

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2811 - Migrate IP Address To Other Interface

Aug 29, 2012

I have a Cisco 2811 with fa 0/0 as my bearer, and a switch module for internal clients.
 
I have an issue with my fa 0/0 flapping, I want to move that ip configuration to fa 0/1
 
as this is a branch office I am reliant on the bearer port to give me coms so changing the IP addresses is difficult.
 
Has any one tried this with a TCL script?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 -Creating FWSM Intra-Chassis Redundancy

Oct 27, 2011

Currently we have two inter-chassis FWSM redundancy. I would like to configure them for intra-chassis.
 
Both FWSM's are in slot 7 of 6509 switches and i want to take secondary out from one of the 6509 switch and insert in the slot 3 of primary switch.
 
I addedd the following commands in my primary switch.
 
There were commands already present for FWSM in primary switch
 
firewall multiple-vlan-interfaces
firewall module 7 vlan-group 1
firewall vlan-group 1  2,3,777
 
to create intra-chassis redundancy i addedd the following command also there.
 
firewall module 3 vlan-group 1
 
after adding that, my firewalls worked fine but there was a issue with site loading. People from outside were able to access inside but from inside, we were not able to go outside.
 
do we need to clear arp from both FWSM's ? is there any other precautionary step, which we need to follow while working on it.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Upgrade Sup720 6509 Chassis - Configure Sup2T Management Ports?

Jul 1, 2012

We've just invested in a pair of Sup2Ts to upgrade a Sup720 6509 chassis but I'm unsure exactly how the management port(s), aka the Connectivity Management Processor (CMP), should be configured (and patched) in a dual supervisor system?Is each CMP an independent entity or is the management interface configuration (IP address, gateway, etc) replicated between supervisors?If it's the latter then do both management ports need to be physically connected at the same time?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: PAT Set Up Successfully On 6506 Chassis

Aug 30, 2012

I have PAT set up successfully on 6506 chassis - My outside address range is 78.24.112.114 255.255.255.240.Relevant parts of the config below: [code] This works fine but of course is only using the one IP address 78.24.112.114.how I can utilize the other outside addresses available or is this not really necessary? I've browsed through loads of Cisco docs.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Put WS-X4712-SFP+E Module Into R-E Chassis?

Feb 3, 2013

why is not possible to put a WS-X4712-SFP+E - module into an R-E chassis?The module has the same connection to backplane as the WS-X4748-UPOE+E and this one works in a R-E chassis.I know the restriction of Cisco that the 4712 is only supported in 4503-E, 4506-E,4507+E and 4510+E, but why?Are there hardware-restrictions, is the backplane different?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4500 Chassis - How To Use VSS With 6500

Aug 22, 2012

We are preparing to install a new switching Infrastructure at one of our sites. We have decided that we want to have two separate chassis as a core. My original idea was to purchase 2 - 4500 chassis and install 10Gb and 1GB line cards in each and use STP and HSRP to load balance between the two cores.
 
We had also contacted a vendor for thier recommendations and they came back with 2 6500 Chassis running VSS. I reviewed what VSS was as I had never heard of it and it looks to me basically to be real close to the same thing as Stacking. I didn't really want to have stacked Cores because I would like to have the flexibility to be able to take one core out and update the software or image, reboot, and such without effecting anything on the network. I can do that with the non-VSS approach but it looks like that would be more of a problem with VSS.
 
My question is, how to use VSS with the 6500's? How to take one of the VSS pairs off line and not effect normal network operations?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4507R Classic Chassis With Sup 6L-E

Jan 4, 2012

Configuring a 4507R classic chassis with redundant Sup 6L-E?  TAC told me the Supervisor 6LE was only supported on the 4507R+E or 4507R-E chassis but I have found in Cisco documentation several places that indicate that the Sup 6LE is supported in the classic chassis.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS4500 Eseries With 3 - Slot Chassis?

Dec 31, 2011

Every one i want to know ws-c4503E series 3 -slot chassis . I have compatibility issues with MEM-C4K-FLD64M AND S45EIPBK9-12240SG will work.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: ASR 1002 Inter-chassis Redundancy

Sep 9, 2012

Can any share some useful links on how this works and how to configure it?  Do you still need to configure FHRP or does configuring redundancy take care of active/standby relationship between the ASR's?                  

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5020 - Fan Chassis Failed

Oct 24, 2011

I have an alert from monitoring system about: “ fan for this system is not in the NORMAL state”. In the switch I found that the problem is with fex 3, see below:
 
Nexus5020# sh env fex 3 fan
Fan Fex: 3:
------------------------------------------------------
Fan             Model               Hw         Status
------------------------------------------------------
Chassis     N2K-C2148-FAN       --         failure
PS-1           N2K-PAC-200W         --         OK
PS-2           N2K-PAC-200W         --         OK
 
 Technician said: fans appear to be operational, BUT the only thing that appears abnormal is STAT light is amber (not sure what it means).

Also, if I compare the temperature from module 3 with module 2 (which doesn’t have an alert) is almost the same, this is why I think the fan is working fine, since module 3 is not hotter that module 2.

What I can do to reset this fan (chassis)? 

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3110x Stack In IBM Bladecenter Chassis

Jul 8, 2012

I have 4x 3110x switches in a Bladecenter H chassis and the stack cables are connected so that they are in a circle (IE, SW1 connects to SW2, SW2 connects to SW3, SW3 to SW4 and SW4 to SW1). Each of the switches physical 10GE port is trunked to a 6509.  If I pull a 3110x switch out, does this network connectivity? Theoretically it should not?
 
TK2EWRBC4SW01#sh switch neigh
  Switch #    Port 1       Port 2
  --------    ------       ------
      1         4             2
      2         1             3
      3         2             4
      4         3             1

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Connecting 3570 Switches To Nexus 2232 To Migrate Server Subnets

Nov 17, 2011

I am in the process of migrating our existing server farm subnets to our new Nexus server farm and I discovered something I wasn’t expecting. My intention is to migrate our existing legacy server farm which is comprised of for paired 3750 switches off of our core 6509s and onto the Nexus and connect them to the 2232s via multi gig port-channel connections, two port channels per switch stack. 
 
NOTE this is expected to be a temporary move as next year we intend to install additional N2Ks and move servers over to these directly. But to minimize the outage/downtime it will be better to move the subnets and switchs all at once.
 
These connections would be grouped 1 gig connections as port channels, one from each switch into one of the two 2232s.
 
Problem I discovered is Cisco does not intend to have switches connected to the Nexus and it immediately disables the ports when they see BPDUs.
 
I found a config that does work and it does fail over from one port-channel connection to the other but with the limitation that when the original port channel comes back online it does not fail back over to the original one, an acceptable situation for us. But I am wondering if Cisco would support this design if we did experience issues down the road.
 
The only issue I really see is to get it to work the config is different on the two N5Ks, see the pert config below for the connections. Both are running the same OS
 
augs1-ba-ar17# sh ver
Cisco Nexus Operating System (NX-OS) Software
TAC support: [URL]

[Code].....

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4507 R + E Chassis With Classic Line Cards?

Jan 8, 2012

Client has Cisco 4507R+E chasis with SUP- 7L-E and he has WS-X4418-GB line card in stock can this line card work with E series chassis

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Configure Dual SUP 7 On 4507 Chassis For Redundancy?

May 24, 2012

I need to configure a 4507 chassis with two SUP 7 installed. I havenot done SUP redundancy comnfiguration and i was owndering

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: LLDP Chassis Discovery On Nexus 5548UP?

May 1, 2012

I'm seeing several error messages like these in the logs of my Nexus 5548UP switches.

2012 Apr 24 16:39:41.470 SSV_5K_SW2 %LLDP-5-SERVER_ADDED: Server with Chassis ID aaaa.bbbb.cccc Port ID mgmt0 management address X.X.X.X discovered on local port mgmt0 in vlan 0 with enabled capability Bridge
 
2012 May  2 05:05:00.627 COR_CCO-NX-5548-UP_01 %LLDP-5-SERVER_REMOVED: Server with Chassis ID aaaa.bbbb.cccd Port ID aaaa.bbbb.cccc on local port Eth1/1 has been removed
 
2012 May  2 05:06:40.328 COR_CCO-NX-5548-UP_01 %LLDP-5-SERVER_ADDED: Server with Chassis ID aaaa.bbbb.cccd Port ID aaaa/bbbb.cccc management address NIL discovered on local port Eth1/1 in vlan 0 with enabled capability None
 
I will say that these 5548s are serving as the distribution layer for a UCS chassis (2x 6120 FIs) but didn't know what kind of visibility the Nexus would have into that - the chassis keyword is what's alluding to this in my mind, and I'm seeing these messages whenever interfaces that connect downstream to the fabric interconnects are brought up or down.

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved