Cisco Switching/Routing :: Sup 720 MSFC3 (HOT) Reload In 6509 Chassis
Mar 9, 2013
We have a backup sup 720 which has a 2 gigabit ethernet though port channel, to another chassis. Suddenly UDLD detected an error and got into err disable, then this err disable didn't let the interface set to DOWN, and created a switch loop, then our Supervisor reloaded. I'd like to know what could have caused this reload. In my opinion could have a been the switch loop, but also I've been checking from the output interpreter the show tech and might have been a bug, the only one that could match in IOS version 12.2(33)SXH, is this one: url...
We're going to disable err-disable next time I guess and recover the link manually, apart from that what could have made the sup for crash and reload?
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Nov 21, 2011
I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports
x1 NAM
x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2011
I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports
x1 NAM
x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2012
Suffered a big outage on the network, the fix was to reload the module 3 on the 6509 switch, we had these errors on the log %CONST_DIAG-SW1_SP-3-HM_PORT_TEST_FAIL: Switch 1 Module 3 TestUnusedPortLoopback Port(s)[24,46] failed. System operation continues.in the end, we reloaded the card and it was all ok. is there anything I can do to check the card / or any deeper logs? would that error cause the card to crash?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 19, 2012
Currently have a pair of 6509 chassis setup with VSS. Only have the Sup and two line cards in each chassis. Would like to replace with a new pair of 6504E chassis. Is it possible to fail one chassis at a time and migrate to the new 6504E?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2012
swapping out a failed supervisor card on a 6509 chassis?
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2013
we have some pairs of 6509-VSS, which partially have old (no more officially supported) 6509-Chassis.All linecards in the VSS are the same (Sup 720-10GE-3C, 67XX).
We now bought some new 6509-E-Chassis and want to change the old chassis by the new ones in a ISSU manner, that means:
1. putting the partner, which chassis changes, in redundancy mode, switch it off, exchange chassis (old "Catalyst 6509", new "Catalyst 6509-E")
2. inserting the line-cards exactly in the same slots and connecting all cables
3. switch on the new chassis, witing to come up in VSS
I'm not sure of having to set the switch number for VSS (is that in the Sup?; configuration? or part of the chassis-memory?)
I've looked up cisco for some hints, but don't found anything.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 18, 2012
Are there any physical characteristic differences between the 6509 and 6509-E chassis?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 9, 2012
I have multiple 6509 vss switch. and i notice when the standby chassis reboot I didn't get any snmp trap, but I got when the active one reboot. my question is is there any mib out there for detecting and got a trap when standby reboot?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2010
I have a heck of a time finding this kind of information on the cisco site...Is the WS-SUP720-BASE line card a fully supported module in the 6509-E chassis?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2012
Any have experience on triggered failover on VSS deployment with 1 VS-720-10G-3C in each chassis? I tried using "redundancy force-switchover" but after that the 20G VSL is flapping up & down and cannot be up normally, we got 1 FWSM in each chassis, any configuration need to fit in this kind deployment? BTW, if I shutdown the power source of VSS active chassis, both FWSM & VSS can failover normally.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2013
setting up VRF-lite on redundant 6509-E chassis to account for chassis failure? Let's say I have 2x 6509-Es configured with HSRP for 2 vlans, ServerA and ServerB. So
6509-A#
!
interface Vlan10
description ServerA VLAN
ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
ip flow ingress
standby 1 ip 10.10.10.1
standby 1 priority 105
[code].....
I now need to create an environment where the Server VLANs can be provided for two customers and they need to be wholly separate. On 6509-A, I make VRF CustomerA and VRF CustomerB and I assign Vlan10 to VRF CustomerA and Vlan20 to CustomerB. Do I create the SAME VRFs on 6509-B with the same logic?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2012
The 6509 Series Switches support the scenario VSS Active-Active Chassis, I would like to setup both switch's as one virtual switch but working at the same time, not with Active - Stand By Chassis.
My plans it to create PortChannel accross both Switches 6509 in order to have 2 links one connected to one slot/switch and the other connected to slot/switch in the second 6509 for servers redundancy.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2012
we need to install a line cards (WS-X4548-GB-RJ45, chassis WS-C4510R-E), on a chassis Ws-6504-E.where I can find information about compatibility?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 1, 2012
We had an power shutdown activity last week, due to which one of the core switch was turned off and ON .After the core switch was turned ON, we had found some of the ACLs missing which were bounded in VLANs. We had given write command before this power shutdown activity.We need to find the root cause for the same.
Switch Model-WS-CISCO-6509-E.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 29, 2012
Need to remove the IPSec VPN SPA module from the 6509 chassis. Does the module is hot swappable or does the 6509 need to be turned off prior to removal.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2011
We have a setup of FWSMs configured in single mode in 6509 chassis. Both 6509 are configured in VSS. Recently I have upgraded the firmwre from 4.0(3) to 4.1(3).....before upgradation config sync was not having any problem.
After upgradation...If any one of the FWSM reload..while coming up it gets stuck in config sync and no command we can run on any of the unit and get the error as..
Configuration update in progress by another process. Also on stannby fwsm no running-config displays.
If we used # failover suspend-config on primary and then reloads the standby fwsm...standby boots up with startup config and when # no failover suspend-config command runs on active fwsm..the sync started and completing succssfully within 15 sec..
Also failover works well..with #no failover active..
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2012
I have inherited a 6509 VSS switch system as the network core and have the task of ensuring proper redundancy and redesign of the directly connected data center devices. One of the connected devices (WLC 4402) physically appears to be connected to both switches - the WLC is in the same rack as VSS-Chassis1 so I can trace the fiber from WLC port 1 to gi1/1/22, the other fiber from the WLC port 2 goes into the floor and presumably over to VSS-Chassis2 gi2/1/22 (there is fiber connected there, I have link lights on both sides, and the port channel, Po200, on the VSS switch which is configured on gi1/1/22 is also configured on gi2/1/22). My question pertains to the CDP neighbor output I get on the VSS switch: (truncated to include just the WLC) [code]
So my question, arising at least partly from the apparently misleading CDP information, is this: How can I confirm that the WLC is correctly dual homed to both core switches? (short of tracing the cable) I ask because there are several other devices (not WLCs) that need to have the dual homed connections confirmed.I tried a layer 2 trace route but for all macs associated with the WLC, the trace abborts with the error "Device has Multiple CDP neighbours on destination port."
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 27, 2011
Currently we have two inter-chassis FWSM redundancy. I would like to configure them for intra-chassis.
Both FWSM's are in slot 7 of 6509 switches and i want to take secondary out from one of the 6509 switch and insert in the slot 3 of primary switch.
I addedd the following commands in my primary switch.
There were commands already present for FWSM in primary switch
firewall multiple-vlan-interfaces
firewall module 7 vlan-group 1
firewall vlan-group 1 2,3,777
to create intra-chassis redundancy i addedd the following command also there.
firewall module 3 vlan-group 1
after adding that, my firewalls worked fine but there was a issue with site loading. People from outside were able to access inside but from inside, we were not able to go outside.
do we need to clear arp from both FWSM's ? is there any other precautionary step, which we need to follow while working on it.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2012
I've just purchased a new Cisco 881.I'm using NAT NVI for my inbound static mappings. However, regardless of the fact that the config is saved to nvram, after a reload of the router, the NAT mappings are setup as traditional inside/outside mappings. This means that inbound connections in to the router on the required services fail, until someone logs on to the router and re-applies the NVI mappings.
Here's a sanitised version of my startup-config:
!
! Last configuration change at 20:20:15 UTC Tue Dec 11 2012 by xxx
version 15.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
[code].....
View 20 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2012
SSH has been enabled on our one and only 4507 switch for several months and working fine. A few weeks ago the switch had to be reloaded and when it was back online I couldn't SSH to it. When I connected via the console and typed "show ip ssh" it came back saying I needed to generate the keys. Did that and it starting working again. The same switch had to turned off and on the other day due to a power down in the server room and when it came back the same thing happened again!!
The version of IOS is: cat4000-i5k91s-mz.122.20.EW
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2013
I have a cable from an SFP module in a WS-C3750-48P with 12.2(55)SE1 running to a Gigabit port on a Cisco WLC. After the switch recovers from a power failure, the gigabit autonegotiation fails. The cure is a long drive to unplug and reseat the SFP. Note this happens at too many similar sites for this to be a loose connection. Interface shutdown then 'no shutdown' is not sufficient. The state is 'line protocol is down (not connected)'. Interface is configured for switchport mode trunk (auto speed, auto duplex). Command 'switchport nonegotiate' makes no difference. Is there a more powerful command than 'shutdown' which might toggle the interface signals? Is there some way of resetting the SFP? sh int gi 1/0/1 displays 'media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX SFP' and zero packets received.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2012
Last night, the C6509-E do a unexpected reload. In the crashinfo, I can see that the last error message before the reload, was as follows: %C6K_ PLATFORM-SP-2-PEER_RESET: SP is being reset by the RP
I consulted the cisco website about this error message and what I found was the following:C6K_PLATFORM-2.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 1, 2012
We've just invested in a pair of Sup2Ts to upgrade a Sup720 6509 chassis but I'm unsure exactly how the management port(s), aka the Connectivity Management Processor (CMP), should be configured (and patched) in a dual supervisor system?Is each CMP an independent entity or is the management interface configuration (IP address, gateway, etc) replicated between supervisors?If it's the latter then do both management ports need to be physically connected at the same time?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2012
while i am configuring a port on switch .The switch reloads.After reload the show version says
System returned to ROM by bus error at PC 0x458F6C, address 0x0
show version from the effected switch is
Cisco IOS Software, C3750E Software (C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(58)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: [URL]
[cODE].....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2012
Our router suddenly reloaded. Below are the crashinfo obtained:
1st crashinfo:
7606_Router#more sup-bootflash:crashinfo_20120604-02260500:00:05: %PFREDUN-6-ACTIVE: Initializing as ACTIVE processor
00:00:05: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHING: System pausing to ensure console debugging output.
00:00:05: %PFREDUN-6-ACTIVE: Initializing as ACTIVE processor
00:00:05: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 to ensure console debugging output.
[code]....
We are running s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF9
View 14 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2013
I have a problem with the Cisco 881 router at one of our customers.It seems that after a "no shutdown" has been given on the Vlan interface, it still goes back to "administratevly down" after a reboot.So when I restart the router I always have to manually "no shutdown" the Vlan interface to come back up.While rebooting the router it also gives the following info in the console screen every time which is strange:
new interface Vlan1 placed in "shutdown" state.We tried several different firmware releases.
Replacing the router with a new Cisco 881 router did not work either. After they sent back the old Cisco 881 router we tested it here and there were no problems, we weren't able to replicate the problem.The configuration we use for the router is correct, we use it for hundreds of customers, so that can't be it either.The customer uses a fortinet firewall behind the router. Could it be that something inside the LAN of the customer that triggers the Vlan to shut down?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 13, 2009
I have a Catalyst 4500 WS-C4506 and S-X4516-10GE Supervisor running under IOS 12.2(52)SG IP BASE SSH. After having installed IOS 12,2(53)SG i wanted to schedule a reload. After entering the reload at command I get the message %Reload in Progress and nothing happens.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2010
I have the following problem with
Situation:
- 2x 3750G-12S Distribution-Switches (DS) and several 3560/2960 Access-Switches (AS)
- redundant Fiber optic uplinks between AS and DS
- Cross-Stack Etherchannel config on all uplinks
- UDLD aggressive mode configured on all uplinks
Problem:
- when I reload the DS and the switch comes up again, I've lost the connection with several (not all) AS
- looking at the AS log I found the following error message: "%UDLD-4-UDLD_PORT_DISABLED: UDLD disabled interface Gi0/1, aggressive mode failure detected"
Cause:
- in the log of the AS I don't see intf Gi0/1 go down during the reload of the DS
- this means the DS didn't shuts down all its ports during the reload
- but this also means that UDLD on AS didn't know about DS reload, and therefore didn't resets counters
Workaroud/Solution
- I'm now configuring errdisable recovery on all AS
So I'm forced to configure errdisable recovery, even if I don't want.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 10, 2012
I would like to test the possibility to reload devices via SNMP for new switches like 2960, 3560 and so on.I know that the command "snmp-server system-shutdown" has to be configured, then I need to send the set query to the device via SNMP.
I have found on the net the OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.9.9.0 but it belongs to an old MIB and doesn't seem to work with new switch models.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2012
I have PAT set up successfully on 6506 chassis - My outside address range is 78.24.112.114 255.255.255.240.Relevant parts of the config below: [code] This works fine but of course is only using the one IP address 78.24.112.114.how I can utilize the other outside addresses available or is this not really necessary? I've browsed through loads of Cisco docs.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 3, 2013
why is not possible to put a WS-X4712-SFP+E - module into an R-E chassis?The module has the same connection to backplane as the WS-X4748-UPOE+E and this one works in a R-E chassis.I know the restriction of Cisco that the 4712 is only supported in 4503-E, 4506-E,4507+E and 4510+E, but why?Are there hardware-restrictions, is the backplane different?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2012
We are preparing to install a new switching Infrastructure at one of our sites. We have decided that we want to have two separate chassis as a core. My original idea was to purchase 2 - 4500 chassis and install 10Gb and 1GB line cards in each and use STP and HSRP to load balance between the two cores.
We had also contacted a vendor for thier recommendations and they came back with 2 6500 Chassis running VSS. I reviewed what VSS was as I had never heard of it and it looks to me basically to be real close to the same thing as Stacking. I didn't really want to have stacked Cores because I would like to have the flexibility to be able to take one core out and update the software or image, reboot, and such without effecting anything on the network. I can do that with the non-VSS approach but it looks like that would be more of a problem with VSS.
My question is, how to use VSS with the 6500's? How to take one of the VSS pairs off line and not effect normal network operations?
View 7 Replies
View Related
