Cisco Switching/Routing :: Auto-redundancy Using Etherchannel In 2960 Not Working?

Apr 15, 2012

I'm using Packet Tracer for testing since I don't have the actual equipment. I have configured etherchannel between two 2960 Switches. I have used the trunk ports FE  0/23 and FE 0/24 on both switches to create the etherchanel. I have connected one PC with each switch. The PCs are in the same VLAN and can ping each other. Howver, when I take down one of the links in the etherchannel, the other link does not take over and I get 100% packet loss. I don't know what seems to be the problem. I'm quoting the configurations below:
 
Switch0:
Switch#sh running-config
Building configuration...
 Current configuration : 1179 bytes
!
version 12.2
no service timestamps log datetime msec
no service timestamps debug datetime msec

[code]....

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Redundancy Between One 2911 And Two 2960?

Aug 2, 2012

we are in the planning phase for a network upgrade. We have two C2960 Switches connected via one (L2) Etherchannel (4x1 Gbit/s) which works very well. In the next phase we would like to upgrade our router to an 2911 series which has 3 gb interfaces. and indeed we would like to create an etherchannel as well. our plan is to use 2 of the 2911 to connect to the first 2960 switch and the one left to the other 2960. i think we will achieve some redundancy with this config.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cross Stack EtherChannel From 3750 To 2960

Mar 25, 2013

We have a pair of WS-C3750X-24T-S in a stack and four WS-C2960S-48TS-L in a stack of their own. There is not really anything too fancy configured (no special VLAN configuration/trunks or etc.) but the 3750 do have two ports configured as L3 for routing. We are not trying to use those ports for EtherChannel. These devices are running IOS 12.2(55)SE3 Essentially we are attempting to make an EtherChannel group using port 48 on all four of the 2960's in their stack (four ports). On the 3750 we will configure an EtherChannel group using port 23 and 24 on both switches (four ports). We then connect them up to form a four member EtherChannel.The ports on both ends are configured as mode ON and they are all 1Gb ports. I elected mode on because I understand at least one of the EtherChannel protocols will not work cross stack. What I would like to ask is whether the above configuration is possible or are we hitting some sort of limitation of EtherChannel cross stack, etc..? I cannot find anything to suggest this configration is invalid, but thought I would ask to see if I missed something in the EtherChannel articles.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 - Simple EtherChannel To Work Between 2 Switches

Jul 29, 2012

For a simple ether channel to work between 2 switches I have configured ports 1 and 2 on both cisco 2960 switches with the channel-group option like this:
 
interface FastEthernet0/1
channel-group 1 mode on
!
interface FastEthernet0/2
channel-group 1 mode on
                  
I thought the port-channel 1 would get automatically created but it didn't, should it?  And under the port-channel interface should I set this as a trunk or do I do this on the 2 fa interfaces on each switch?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 / 2960 - How To Configure 2 Ports To Provide Redundancy

Jan 21, 2013

As per the attached diagram: How do I configure the 2 ports on the 3560 (Ports 6 & 7) and the connected ports on each of the 2960 switches (Port 25) to provide redundancy.
 
If the up link from Switch A dies then I need the traffic to flow through the trunk and utilize the up link on Switch B with minimal delay (milliseconds).

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3640 GLBP Working Now Want Interface Redundancy?

Dec 6, 2011

So I have 2 routers (cisco 3640) that each go to their own ISP and then back to the same switch.  I have setup ospf and glbp, and now have pretty good redundancy.  If either internet connection or routers go down everything is still golden. 
 
So I was thinking that if an interface went down then the router would not be load balanced with glbp which got me thinking whats the best way to get interface redundancy (and I was going to add a 2nd switch with the second interface).

1) Setup BVI on the 2 interfaces.
2) Setup a 2nd interfaces (on each router), I would have to split the subnet, for instance: [code]then the machines could be on the subnet 192.168.0. 0/23 and setup glbp for 1 ip across all 4 interfaces (I'm not even sure if you can do this but think it would work).
3) Is there a way to utilize etherchannel or anything like this
 
A negative to option 2 would be that if 1 of the interfaces went down, all the sudden 2/3 (or so) of your traffic would be going through 1 router.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Switch Port Auto-state Exclude Command Not Working In 4500

Jun 3, 2013

I have configured a SVI in my 4500 ( Sup 7-E 10GE,,,,,,and,,,,,cat4500e-universalk9.SPA.03.02.00.SG.150-2.SG.bin) switch and it is showing Down Down, because there were no active switch port in the vlan, I added one switch port to this vlan but this port also in the down state, so i added the SWITCH PORT AUTO STATE EXCLUDE command under this port, even after this also the SVI never came up, So i added one systen to the port so both the switch port and the SVI came up...So why SWITCH PORT AUTO STATE EXCLUDE command have no effect in this model of the switch..

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: SSH Not Working With 2960

Jun 4, 2012

I have an switch 2960 and i have made an SSH connection . But the problem is that whenever i try to open with my teraterm or putty it ask for username and after that password but does take the password. It shows an error of password what should be the problem.
 
Commands that i entered to make SSH
 
config# username admin password pankaj
 
config# ip domain-name home.local
 
config# crypto key generate rsa
 
config# 1024
 
config# ip ssh version 2

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 SSH Not Working

Jun 4, 2012

I have an switch 2960 and i have made an SSH connection . But the problem is that whenever i try to open with my teraterm or putty it ask for username and after that password but does take the password. It shows an error of password what should be the problem.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 / SG 300 Switch - VoIP Setup - Asymmetric Routing Not Working

May 21, 2013

I have a Cisco SG 300-20 as the core switch, layer 3. It is 192.168.4.6 on VLAN1 and 192.168.5.1 for VLAN2 (VOIP). All the ports are set in trunk mode. DHCP relay is setup on this switch.
 
The phones connected into a layer 2, Catalyst 2960-S switch. All ports are set in trunk mode. Default gateway on it is set to 192.168.5.1.
 
DHCP for both VLANs is provided by a Windows Server 2008 R2 server (the relay IP 192.168.4.15).
 
There is also an ASA 5510 in the mix which is 192.168.4.1. It has a route added to it for the 192.168.5.0 network to go to the SG 300 (192.168.5.1).
 
Just the two switches can ping each other on the 192.168.5.x network when I "add vlan 2" to the trunk port that is connected between the SG 300 and the 2960. The phones don't get DHCP on the 2960 switch. And I cannot ping 192.168.5.x from the ASA or anything else on the 192.168.4.x network.
 
After a bit of reading on intra-vlan routing for the SG 300 switch, I am thinking the SG 300 has to be the "center" of things so I need to make it 192.168.4.1 to be the gateway for both VLANs and change the ASA to 192.168.4.2 for VLAN1, etc. And I really can't do asymmetric routing with this switch.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 And Nortel 9150 Not Working Together

Jan 18, 2012

We have 3 Nortel RG 9150 remote PBXs installed at a branch location, and  they have been functioning well for years plugged into 3Com 4500 10/100 switches.  These  switches have a very basic configuration; nothing special.  We are  transitioning over to Cisco 2960 switches with very basic  configurations.  The problem is that when we plug the 9150 into the 2960  switch, the RX light flashes like it should, but the TX light only  flickers intermittently.  We cannot ping it from the switch or local  router.  Everything in this building is in VLAN 1.  I've tried turning  on full duplex on the 9150 and/or hard-setting the speed/duplex on the 2960  switch.  The company that maintains our 9150 sent a guy out who was  completely puzzled by this too.  In some ways this seems too basic to be a problem, but it is.  The twist on this problem is that the 3Com switch, which the 9150s are plugged into, is connected directly into the Cisco 2960 that I can't make them work on.  Plug them into the 3Com, they work; move them upstream to the Cisco, and they stop, even after I reboot them.
 
Here are the port configs of the 3Com and Cisco switches.
 
Cisco
interface FastEthernet0/15
switchport mode access

[Code].....

View 15 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 Ether Channel Not Working

Sep 23, 2012

I was configured ether channel between two cisco 2960s series switches. It is working properly. I was replaced two cables in etherchannel. Now one link working remaining link is down(both cables are working cables only). Below are ether channel details.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cat 2960 - Map / Service-Policy Input Is Not Working

Nov 10, 2011

I have some trouble with that policy-map on my 2960 or 3560 switches with LAN base 12.2(53)SE2. I want to use that feature to catch video traffic from webcams in laptops  which can't send dscp values out of the box. This is my test config to check if the function is working: catch every traffic from my workstation for testing, access-list 101 permit ip any any, class-map match-all CL_TEST

1. I can't see any counters with the command "sh policy-map interface  FastEthernet 0/1". Cisco tells that this command is not possible. But how I can see if the policy is working correct?
2. When I did the configuration I can't see any packets with dscp af41 on the out going interface on the switch with "sh mls qos int gi0/1 statistic" as I expected. After reloading the switch I see the pakets with af41. Okay for that moment. But.After that I changed something in the policy-map. Only "set ip dscp ef" for a second test.

Generating some traffic I see only packets with af41 as before I changed the policy-map. No traffic with ef on the outgoing interface.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2960 / ISP Failover Or Redundancy For Internet Access?

Oct 16, 2012

There are four figures(A,B,C,D) shown in attached diagram.my aim to achieve wan side failover, mean to say, if one ISP or Router goes down, the other should still be reachable.
 
Cisco 2960 = L2 Switch
Cisco 3560 = L3 Switch
 
Here I am discussing only two redundancy methods i.e Floating Static route and IP SLA. There are following questionnaires related to attached  diagram given below
 
Figure A:
1. Floating static route (Yes or No)
2. IP SLA (Yes or No)
 Figure B:
1. Floating static route (Yes or No)
2. IP SLA ( Yes or No) 
Figure C:
1. Floating static route (Yes or No)
2. IP SLA ( Yes or No)

[code].....

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Add 2960 To Stack Of 4 X 2960 Switches

Feb 7, 2012

I have an existing stack of 4 x 2960-S switches connected by stack cables.I would like to add another 2960-S switch to the stack but am unable to as the 2960-S will only allow 4 x 2960-S switches per stack.how I would add the 5th 2960-S switch to the existing stack of 4 x 2960-S switches.

View 12 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960-S To 2960-LST Configuration Over Fiber?

Feb 11, 2013

I have a 24 port 2960-S that is not communicating with a 2960-LST that it is directly connected to over fiber.  The link is up on the LST but will not come up on the -S.  What command should I use to bring up this link?  I have tried no shut from the (Config-if)# prompt.         

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / 4900 - Network Down Cause Switching Supervisor With Redundancy

Jan 11, 2012

we've had an issue with our network, we have 2 6509 connected with redundancy, which are connected with 2 x 4900 Switches, from which are connected to a ESX Chassis for visualization, the thing is that the ESX stopped working, and the 4900 switches, and the main core were suffering from overload, they hang on it very well, in order to stop the overload, one of the links to the ESX Chassis were disconnected from one of the 4900 switches. The CPU usage from the 4900 and the core(6509) went down below 40%, and then they started to migrate the virtual servers from the chassis to another 2 chassis that were added right after. They were actually working well, but suddenly the 6509 changed to the other supervisor after everything was OK. We were wondering what could have been the cause of this, maybe the virtual servers migrations, maybe the overload from the ESX ? We also had a few question, is there any need to reload the cores every few months as a planned task ? Because the cores have been up for more than 1 year. And also is there any kind of of tool to monitor the CPU status, or the status overall from the cores or the switches ?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Switching Redundancy For ESXi VMHosts Scenario

May 12, 2013

I have the following devices :
 
-1 VM Host
-2 Layer 3 switches
 
I would like to provide full redundancy for all vlans being used by VM Guests on the VM Host as well as the management vlan being used by the VM Host.I have created two LACP etherchannel connections on the VM Host. Each etherchannel from the host consists of  4 ports spanning a single NIC. One etherchannel connection goes to a trunked etherchannel connection on switch 1, and the other etherchannel connection goes to a trunked etherchannel connection on switch 2.Switch 1 and switch 2 have an etherchannel connection between them that carries all of the vlans in the topology.Vlan 2 is the managment vlan. Vlans 3, 4, and 5 are vlans that VM guest systems will be using for normal data traffic.
 
I intend to use switch 1 as the VRRP active router and spanning-tree root bridge for vlans 2 and 3.I intend to use switch 2 as the VRRP active router and spanning-tree root bridge for vlans 4 and 5.The spanning-tree configuration is using multiple spanning-tree with two instances. Instance 1 has vlans 2 and 3 associated and Instance 2 has vlans 4 and 5 associated. I would like to have this topology be fault tolerant to the point where if one of the etherchannel links between the host and one of the switches goes down, (for example, if switch 1 was powered off) traffic will be automatically redirected through the other functional link. I believe that my VRRP configuration would allow for a fairly quick failover of layer 3 services, but I am not certain that my design will be functional at a layer 2 level.
 
What I am uncertain about is how spanning-tree will converge. I am assuming that the virtual switch on the VM host will not be forwarding any BPDUs being sent by either switch. Would either of the links connecting to the host be considered a redundant link by either switch?Would the link between switch 2 and the host be inactive for all vlans in MST instance 1 during normal operation?Conversely, would the link between switch 1 and the host be inactive for all vlans in MST instance 2 during normal operation? Would all links remain active for ALL vlans? Would this mean that some traffic may travel through switch 2 to reach switch 1 instead of going directly to switch 1?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: ISR 881-SEC-K9 Vs 891-K9 And 2 ISPs Redundancy

Nov 1, 2012

have main office of 70 people.Also I have 2 redundant ISP:One give me 20 mbit/s Other only 2 mbit/s and it is my backup ISP.
 
I have some resources in data center and I need a IPSec VPN to it and some other location. I suppose there will be up to 3-5 IPSec tunnels. I choose Cisco ISR 881-SEC-K9 with one wan port and 4 LAN switch. But know I’m looking for Cisco 891-K9. There is no security bundle for it. But in cisco.com this router is marked Cisco 891-K9 Security router. Does it support security features like VPNs, ZBF, IOS Firewall, NBAR and IP SLA for ISP redundancy? Also if my boss will choose chipper Cisco router 881-SEC-K9. Will I be able to organize 2 ISP redundancy on 4 LAN switch port inside VLAN interfaces because there is only one WAN port?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: How To Configure L3 Etherchannel 3845 ISR

Jun 9, 2013

When I try to add an IP address to a port-channel interface on a 3845 ISR I am getting an error that seems to imply that only L2 etherchanneling is possible.  Am I missing something?Cisco IOS Software, 3800 Software (C3845-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T8,
  
sfo-c3845-1#sho run int port-channel 1
Building configuration... 
Current configuration : 31 bytes
!
interface Port-channel1
end

[code].....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Implement EtherChannel On 2901

Feb 3, 2013

I am trying to implement an etherchannel on a cisco 2901 (IOS 15.1). i have already created the port-channel but i cannot assign the gig interface to the channel group.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2950 - Etherchannel Doesn't Go Up

Jun 11, 2012

I have a problem with an etherchannel between a cisco 2950 and a couple of catalyst 4506. The  cisco 2950 is connect via an etherchannel to the catalyst 4506A. The  channel consist of two port on both side and is in trunk mode, encapsulation dot1q.Now i have the necessity to connect the 2950 to the other catalyst, 4506B. So,  i copy the same configuration on the 4506B, but when I unplug the two  rj45 cables from the catalyst 4506A to plug them in the 4506B the  etherchannel doesn't go up in any way.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Etherchannel Between Two Vtp Domain

Mar 25, 2013

I have two switches 6509 one switch is confire with VTP domain ABC Other switch is configure with ABZ, At present the switch is configure with the L3 interface and one fiber cable is connected between two switches.I want to remove L3 configuration wants to make L2 etherchannel and wants to ceraeate Loop back will assing same ip both side.The OSPF is configure both side , i will not do any changes in the OSPF as L3 ip is advertise in OSPF.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 5508 Etherchannel To Nortel?

May 24, 2012

If the ports on a 5508 can only perform etherchannel(no LACP or PAGP), only on mode, how does a 5508 create a bundle with a nortel switch?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: EtherChannel - Configuring On 4500?

Feb 28, 2012

I am about to configure 4 Gig ports for EtherChannel.  I've been reading about EtherChannel and it seems easy enough to configure.  I have a host (server)which I am going to connect to these 4 - gig ports.  This is new for me and would like some feedback for those that have used EtherChannel on their layer 2 switches.  The gig ports will be an access port with VLAN XX.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 - Have EtherChannel Across 2 Switches?

Dec 6, 2011

Is it possible to have ether-channel across 2 switches? As an example, having a server with 2 ports connect, 1 port to Switch-A and the other to Switch-B and then use those two links on the sepatate switches but to the same server to form an Etherchannel.
 
The Switch-A and Switch-B are 3560 series

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Etherchannel Does Not Go Up / Up From 3750 Stack To 6k5 Vss

May 19, 2012

We have two 6k5 configured as vss and it is working fine. For each floor we have a 3750 stack. In each 3750 stack we have 4 switches. From the first 3750 we have a fiber link to the first 6k5 and from the fourth switch we have another fiber link to the other 6k5 switch, for each floor/3750 stack, both configured as etherchannel. We installled each 3750 stack/floor in different maintenance windows; in all these installations we have problems configuring the etherchannel. After we configure the etherchannel on 3750 stack and in the vss, the etherchannel does not go up/up. We see the etherchannel up/down; after a lot off work, try and error, configuring shut/ no shut, adding and excluding links from the etherchannel; in any aleatory moment the etherchannel goes up/up and works fine. Is there any bug related with these IOS versions, or is there any right procedure to configure etherchannel from vss to 3750 stack?

3750 stack config (IOS
Cisco IOS Software, C3750 Software (C3750-IPBASEK9-M), Version 12.2(50)SE1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2))
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1switchport trunk encapsulation dot1qswitchport trunk allowed vlan 100,101,371,372switchport mode trunkchannel-group 1 mode on!interface GigabitEthernet4/0/1switchport trunk encapsulation dot1qswitchport trunk allowed vlan 100,101,371,372switchport mode trunkchannel-group 1 mode on!interface Port-channel1switchport trunk encapsulation dot1qswitchport trunk allowed vlan 100,101,371,372switchport mode trunk

[code]....

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 - Cannot See Which Protocol Is In Use For Etherchannel

Jan 31, 2013

I am trying to review the port-channel configuration on a 6500 series. I am issuing the "show etherchannel summary" command and the out put shows the Group, Port-Channel, and Ports. It does not show me the protocol that is in use such as PAgP or LACP. Does this have to do with the Etherchannel in the "On" mode rather than "active", or "Auto"?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Throughput Of Etherchannel On 3560G

Nov 27, 2012

We have a problem with the throughput over etherchannel in LACP with 2 or 4 ports. It is iSCSI traffic (vmware esxi 4.1 U3) is going from 2 separate NICs (ports) to the etherchannel (with 2 or 4 ports) that has a SAN connected (Nexenta).

The SAN is configured in passive LACP and the switch is in active LACP.  Actually it does not matter if we do LACP or just MODE ON, still same result: ~1GBit/s throughtput in either direction.  Like already mentioned, 2 or 4 ports in the etherchannel make no difference, or the configuration of the etherchannel.

I will post some config data below, but here is the question: Why can't we see traffic beyond 1GBit/s?  Source and destination are capable of doing much more than that (vmware esxi RAID 5 of 1TB SATA; SAN 16 x 1TB NL-SAS). If we look with CNA, we can see that the traffic is balanced equally over the etherchannel ports. With or without QOS or flowcontrol, no difference. This whole traffic happenes on this switch. 
 
!
port-channel load-balance src-dst-ip
!
interface Port-channel5

[Code]....

View 13 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 SSO Redundancy IOS Upgrade

Sep 9, 2012

I have a 6509 switch with SSO Redundancy (STANDBY HOT) with IOS ver 12.2(17d)SXB11, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) (c6k222-jk9sv-mz.122-17d.SXB11.bin). I need to upgrade the IOS on this switch.I have 512MB Memory on the switch and 40144896 bytes free on Disk0.which IOS is the latest version to upgrade and also give me some hints for IOS upgrade on this switch?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Have Redundancy Between WS-X6K-SUP1A-2GE And WS-X6K-S2-PFC2

Mar 26, 2012

I would like to know if i can have redundancy between these Supervisor Engine (on the same chassis) :
 
WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE & WS-X6K-S2-PFC2  

I already know that WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE + WS-F6K-PFC2  =  WS-X6K-S2-PFC2, but i'm not sure if we can have compatibility(redundancy) between these two cards.
 
Example :

Mod Slot Ports Module-Type Model Sub Status
--- ---- ----- ------------------------- ------------------- --- --------
1 1 2 1000BaseX Supervisor WS-X6K-S2-PFC2 yes standby
2 2 2 1000BaseX Supervisor WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE yes ok

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2800 / How To Setup Redundancy

Jun 13, 2012

How to setup redundancy on a 2800 series Router so that whenever it fails it will be routed through the MPLS router

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Auto QoS On 4507R-E?

Mar 15, 2010

I have a 4507R-E chassis with Supervisor IV running IOS 12.2(50)SG.  I am trying to configure "auto qos voip trust" on some of the uplink ports.  When I try to configure it on a port that is in a channel group, I get the error "AutoQoS Error: AutoQoS can not be configured on member port(s) of a port-channel".  I have also tried configuring it on the channel interface, but it is not an available command under the channel interface.  Is there a way to do auto qos on the channel interfaces or their member ports or does it have to be configured manually?

View 12 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved