Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 7K Version 6.0(4) Route Redistribution (path Invalid)
Sep 6, 2012
Is there a known bug for Nexus 7K version 6.0(4) related to route redistribution?I have few vlan interfaces and being redistributed to the BGP.vlan interfaces are all up ang pingable.After configuring redistribution, vlan route is not in the bgp table.sho ip bgp is saying "path invalid"
BGP routing table entry for 10.165.101.192/28, version 26302
Paths: (3 available, best #3)
Flags: (0x180c0021) on new-list, is not in urib, need resync with RIB, exported, has label
vpn: version 47719, (0x100002) on xmit-list
local label: 492294
[code]....
View 7 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 15, 2012
I'm looking to redistribute static routes in to OSPF on a Nexus 7k. To do this I'll be using a route-map with a match statement. My question is can you match routes using an ACL, a prefic-list or both. The reason that I ask is that in some docs I've read it states the following:
IP access lists—(For policy-based routing only). Match based on source or destination IP address, protocol, or QoS parameters. This tends to indicate that you can't use IP access lists for the match criteria for redistribution.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 24, 2012
Ok I didn't setup my OSPF on my 7010. Today I found out that any static route I put into my 7010 gets sent into to my MPLS network. My 6509's you have to "Tag" the static rout for this to happen. Was under the impression the same was necessary for the 7010 or at least it had to "match" an access list. How can I fix the below so that by default all static routes are not resdistributed into OSPF?
[CODE]...
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 26, 2012
I would like to perform nondisruptive upgrades on two Cisco Nexus 5010s that currently run NX-OS version 4.1(3)N2(1) to Release 5.1(3)N2(1a). Is this possible? Or, do I need to upgrade to Release 5.0(2)N1(1) first?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2012
i have a big problem because i configure a vlans with vrf and HSRP but, when i do "show hsrp brief", dont show this interfaces and, i can ping virtual IP. it seems hsrp dont work.
SWSERVSCAMILO_N7010_A#
interface Vlan405
description smsc-fwatlas1
no shutdown
[Code] ....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2011
this is a Nexus 5596 L3 with the latest code:
It looks like the deny statement is not working as I can see all routes I am redistributing. I even did a deny on a specific route and I still see it in the routing table on another router in the autonomous system.The same below works fine on IOS platform. [code]
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2013
I have a Catalyst switch that is redistributing some static routes into OSPF. These are received on a Nexus 7K and appear in the database however the 7K does not add them to its routing table, one of the routes is ignored and not added. I haven't got a clue why this is happening.
The routes on the Catalyst are as follows with ID of 172.30.255.22:
ip route 172.24.59.0 255.255.255.0 10.56.7.46
ip route 192.168.168.0 255.255.255.0 10.56.7.62
on the 7K the database shows:
172.24.59.0 172.30.255.22 1374 0x80001a44 0x1a48 0
192.168.168.0 172.30.255.22 1374 0x80001a45 0x6c5b 0
The routing table shows:
sh ip ro 172.24.59.0/24IP Route Table for VRF "default"'*' denotes best ucast next-hop'**' denotes best mcast next-hop'[x/y]' denotes [preference/metric]
172.24.59.0/24, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 172.30.253.10, Po7, [110/20], 20w4d, ospf-NCC, type-2
sh ip ro 192.168.168.0/24IP Route Table for VRF "default"'*' denotes best ucast next-hop'**' denotes best mcast next-hop'[x/y]' denotes [preference/metric] Route not found
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 27, 2013
I have a pair of 5596 running in a vPC with Nexus 2248 connected to each N5596. When I do the command "show fex" I get the following output on the 2nd 5596
Number Description State Model Serial
------------------------------------------------------------------------
101 FEX101 AA Version Mismatch N2K-C2248TP-E-1GE SSI16390705
102 FEX102 AA Version Mismatch N2K-C2248TP-E-1GE SSI163704AD
122 FEX122 Online N2K-C2232PP-10GE SSI16370195
I'm running version 5.1(3)N1(1) on both of the 5K's. I have looked through all the configuration and I am not understanding why I am getting this error. I have tried to look it up on [URL], but not having a ton of luck.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 3, 2012
I am working on Nexus 7010 with NX-OS 5.1.5. I have to delete the static route 10.10.0.0/16 via 10.16.0.21. [code] I try to remove the route with the command "no ip route 10.10.0.0/16 10.16.0.21" and I have the message below % Route not deleted, it does not exist..I don't understand why I have this message because the static route exist.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2012
I am having a problem reaching a soho linksys e1000 router through a second hop cisco 2900 router.Here is a brief topology of the network: I am using OSPF area 100 for all networks except for
192.168.2.0 on R1 to E1000 which is RIPv2
R1 directly connects to R2 with a point-to-point serial on network 192.168.12.0 /30 with ip 192.168.1.13
R1 directly connects to a a switchport using network 192.168.2.0 /24 with ip 192.168.1.75
R3 directly connects to a switchport using network 192.168.1.128.0 /25 with ip 192.168.1.129
R3 directly connects to a different cisco router using ethernet on network 192.168.1.0 with ip 192.168.1.1
E1000 directly connects to a switchport using network 192.168.2.0 /24 with ip 192.168.2.1
The switch has a vlan ip on 192.168.1.128 /25?I can ping from R1 to E1000?I can ping from R3 to R1 192.168.2.75? I can't ping from R3 to E1000 192.168.2.1?show ip route on R2 indicates that network 192.168.2.0 is reachable via the serial connection on 192.168.1.12?I have redistributed rip to ospf area 100 and OSPF to RIP on R1?I am wondering why R1 can reach E1000 on network 192.168.2.0, and why R3 can reach R1s 192.168.2.0 newtork, but R3 can't reach the E1000.There is an R2 router than can reach R1 and also cannot reach E1000, but I assume it's for the same reasons R3 can't, so I've omitted the remainder of that topology for this question.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2013
I have two ospf processes running on a single 3570 edge router that has a dedicated transport circuit back to our network core. We are adding an additional "transport" only circuit into a new location that is also apart of the second ospf process backbone which will connect back to our core. There will also be a 3750 for this new circuit termination. Currently we are only redistributing ospf process 2 into ospf process 1 (1 = core backbone).
#router ospf 1
#redistribute ospf 2 subnet
We have no need to have ospf process 1 redistributed into the process 2 tables. That being said, when we add an additional transport ciruit, or path back to our core backbone, will this configuration present any issues with the redistribution process and failover.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2011
I have 2 ASBR routers, AGFR01RTR03 and AGFR02RTR03, performing OSPF to OSPF redistribution in both ways for the same ***. They also do summarization for our private addressing scheme. It is all working just fine for that part (neighbors, summarization, redistribution).
AGDC01RTR01 --- AGDC02RTR01 (OSPF 1000 ABRs)
| |
| |
AGFR01RTR03 --- AGFR02RTR03 (OSPF 1000 / 53 ASBRs)
Let's focus on AGDC01RTR01 with a specific entry here (IP subnet is fake) :
Routing entry for 1.1.1.0/25
Known via "ospf 1000", distance 110, metric 300, type inter area
Last update from 10.2.244.76 on GigabitEthernet5/1, 1d03h ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.2.244.76, from 10.2.1.249, 1d03h ago, via GigabitEthernet5/1
Route metric is 300, traffic share count is 1
[code]...
View 15 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2013
what the upgrade path is for 5505 ASA . I have one which is version 7.2 and need to upgrade it to 8.4(5). I have read that it needs to upgraded btwn major release versions.Not sure if I need to upgrade from 7.2 - 8.0 , then form 8.0 - 8.2, then from 8.2 - 8.3 and finally 8.3 to 8.4 or can I just upgrade from 7.2 - 8.2 and then from 8.2 - 8.4 .Also what is the minimum memory requirements for vers 8.4 .my ASA running on vers 7.2 currently has 256Mb Memory and I will be upgrading this to 512MB before I do the upgrade the image above?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2012
I'm trying to troubleshoot a problem with mpls fast reroute. The primary (protected) link is between PE-PE and the backup link is PE-P-PE. The IGP I'm using is OSPF. When there is a issue with the primary link and debug mpls tra tunnels signalling there is a message "LSP-TUNNEL-SIG: TunnelX [237]: re-route path verification failed (protected) [Can't use link x.x.x.x on node x.x.x.x]". After 30 seconds (without ospf tuning) the SPF is recalcalated, but that's not the point From the show mpls tra tunnels tu1013 (the backup one)everything looks ok:
Status:Admin: up Oper: up Path: valid Signalling: connected From show mpls tra fast-reroute database everything is ok, the status is Ready I'm using 7206VXR, Version 12.4(24)T3
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2011
I have a Cisco router 877. I am trying to configure a backup with ISDN.The primary line is an ADSL over pppoe. The problem is that despite the primary line fails, doesn't change the path and continue going by the main route.I have a very similar setup, also with a cisco 877, but with a normal DSL and it works perfectly.I solved the problem by activating a tracking but is slower than the other method.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 4, 2013
Any good link that explains the NX-OS upgrade path? I am trying to go from 5.0(2a) to 5.2x.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2013
I have 2 nexus 5000 switches configured with a trunk linking the two how can i do the follwoing
BOX 2
vrf context management
ip route 0.0.0.0/0 192.162.88.9
BOX 2
vrf context management
ip route 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.88.10
1. ping between the two boxes, i set up static route's but when i ping i get the error "NO ROUTE TO DESTINATION"
2. routing between the two
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2012
I've Cisco7609-S with IOS 12.2(33)SRC2 met an issue is that "show ip route x.x.x.x" and "show ip cef x.x.x.x" shown next-hop is not actual switched next-hop.
For example, "show ip route 192.168.1.1" and "show ip cef 192.168.1.1" shown correct next-hop is 10.1.1.1, but the traffic destine to 192.168.1.1 actually not through 10.1.1.1, but always through the default route next-hop. Everything works normal after rebooted the router. Suppose it should caused by a bug? BTW, my Cisco7609 is runing BGP with ISP which received about 10K routes.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2012
Your product is stable but not profitable For the price your customers is easier to buy a model Zyxel Correct firmware for the static route, or Dynamic Routing (RIP)LinkSys E1000 Enabled - Dynamic Routing (RIP) NO RESULTS!ZyXEL KEENETIC LITE - automatic routing!
View 9 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2012
Nexus infrastructure is pair of N7K switches, with dual homed 5K/2K devices connected, links use vPC. They want to extend vlan's from the 5K/2K side across a L2 path into another DC, this path is only connected into one of the N7K switches, call this 7K switch A.I'm concerned that packets from the 5K/2K side back to the remote DC could get dropped due to the vPC loop dectection process. If a packet from the 5K/2K side traverses the path into the same N7K (7K switch A) as the L2 extension, I dont see a problem. But, if the etherchannel load balance in the 5K sends traffic to the packet to N7K B, in order to get to the L2 path extension to the remote DC the packet gets forwarded across the vPC. My understanding is that this packet will get dropped by N7K A as its local L2 path to the remote DC is up, is this the case?I see a solution is to plug the L2 path into a 2K, but before I suggest this is my understanding of the loop detection process correct?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2011
We are facing issue of continous packet discards On nexus4001L link (int po2) to Nexus5020 switch. Nexus4001L is installed in IBM blade center server and we have FCOE enabled in this setup. [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2013
I have been tasked to replace the existing Cat 6500 and 3750 switches by Nexus 7000 and Nexus 2000.I was told initially my boss plans to get 2 x Nexus 7000 and then eventually blow up to 4 x Nexus 7000s.For Nexus, is there a list of tasks / points that i need to consider for building the initial design?
Can i just link the Nexus 7000 like the following?
N7k-A ========= N7k-B
| |
lots of N2ks lots of N2ks
View 12 Replies
View Related
Dec 22, 2011
Struggle to find the SNMP MIBS of the Nexus 5000 FEX tranceivers.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2012
May I know how to manually set the priority (root ID and bridge ID priority) and for spanning tree? Which one should I use based on the command below? and how does it affect the path cost of it?
set spantree root 1
spanning vlan1 priority 4096
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2013
Lets say i have 2 3750 switches stacked via backend stack cables. Now if a packet needs to go from 1 switch in the stack to second switch in the stack, will it travel via stack cable or do we need to connect both switches via uplink ports (ethernet or sfp). I tried reading datasheet but it no wheres mention the actual frame path between switches in stack.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2012
we are planning a Nexus datacenter project with this layout:Our experiences with Nexus switches are not so large until now and the manuals are very extensive.Both N5K´s should be connected directly with all 4 N2K switches. I did not find a layout like this in the manuals. Only a design,where only 2 N2K are connected to one N5K, with this fex config:Now I´m not sure if it is right to make a config like this with the same slots and fex´s or with different slots and fex´s.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2012
I have an issue that I am trying to track down. When I have 2 servers on the same VLAN on my AS pair, all is good because nothing leaves the switch. Where the issue is, is when I have 2 servers on different VLAN's and it requires a hop across the Core router pair. This hop drops the throughput rate by about 20-25% (from 44M to 35-36M)I think I know the issue, but want some input to from other to make sure I am not off-base. I have a pair of 6509E chassis' running Sup720 (VS-S720-10G) with CEF720 (X6748-GE-TX) modules. This is my Access Pair running VSS to look as 1 switch.
These tie into the Core pair of 6500E chassis' running Sup720 (Sup720-3B). This issue I see is that the core has a CEF720 card (6724-SFP), but the AS pair does not connect to the core on that card, they connect on a RJ45 Ethermodule (6148A-GE-TX) card. Would the fact that the AS pair does not connect to the core on the CEF7220 module on the core, cause the traffic to not make use of the CEF features of the Core and make each packet then have to be processed by the core instead of Express Forwarded?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2012
I am in the process of upgrading our stack of 4 switches consist of WS-C3750G-48PS. Upon reading release notes found that there are two versions of release notes 1 day apart, the one 02 Sep 2012 saying that WS-C3750-48PS is not supported in this version. Then in release next day 03 Sep 2012 that note has been removed. Which one is correct. Is it supported with my model of switch or not.also unable to update boot path in the stack switches, "switch all" is not supported in the current IOS. Master switch has new boot path but unable to change in slaves.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2012
A customer wants to upgrade an IOS Base (cat4500-ipbasek9-mz.122-25.SG4.bin) of a WS-C4507R Cisco, for a IOS that have a enterprices functionalities.We install an IOS cat4500e-entservicesk9-mz.122-53.SG5.bin, but we had the following results:
config-register = 0x2102
Autobooting specified file using Variable BOOT .....
Current BOOT file is --- bootflash: cat4500e-entservicesk9-mz.122-53.SG5.bin
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2012
i just want to ask whether i should do some configurations or not on my cisco switch 4500 L3 regarding the error of 500 invalid port command when host try to access FTP active on to FTP server, i just did static route on gig interface with no switchport mode to that host network, all traffic type was allowed except the FTP with active mode?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2013
I bought a cisco router last week. The reseller said it is a brand new one. However, when I try to set it with console cable connecting to PC, the default password does not work. I tried to use control+break to get access to rommon for password recovery. The tera term pro displayed nothing at all! In thin case, what should I do to setup the router? Dose the reset button in the back work to restore the router to factory setting(which means i can use default username and password)?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2012
We have a Cisco 2911 router. We installed a EHWIC-4ESG module and configured the router based on configuration below.
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.0(1r)M9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
System image file is "flash0:c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M1.bin"
Cisco CISCO2911/K9 (revision 1.0) with 483328K/40960K bytes of memory.
7 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
1 terminal line(code)
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2010
have just set up a WLC 4402 as a Guest WLAN controller on the DMZ of our network. I have successfully managed to get our internal controllers to connect to it, with the exception of 1. it says the control path is up but the data path is down. the other 14 controllers worked fine, and in testing the last one was OK but it is now not working properly. the 2 controllers can ping each other but just won't create the data tunnel. there is a firewall in the middle but that has been set up to allow traffic between the 2 groups of controllers to be unrestricted.
the internal controllers are 4404's and all controllers are running the same version of code. 5.1.151.0.
View 31 Replies
View Related
