Cisco Switching/Routing :: Policy Map On 3550 Not Working?
Sep 27, 2012
We have a metro Ethernet service, basically our WAN connection, that we use to connect 4 sites. This MOE service has a CIR of 200 Mbps, connected to a port on a 3550-12T running Version 12.1(22)EA5 at 1000 Mbps. We are exceeding our CIR at times during the day for short bursts which is causing the MOE switch to drop packets, which I suspect I am seeing manifest itself in some choppy VoIP conversations and dropped ICMP packets from our network monitoring software. I implemented policy maps to apply an outbound service policy to the interface connected to the MOE service, but I am not seeing any matches to the access lists or the service policy. I’m not sure if I am missing something or perhaps the IOS is not capable?
Below is the config for the service policy and some command output. Notice that there are hits on a statndard access list that is used for other purposes, but the extended access lists used for the class maps have no matches.
!
class-map match-all REALTIME
match access-group name REALTIME
[Code].....
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Nov 10, 2011
I have some trouble with that policy-map on my 2960 or 3560 switches with LAN base 12.2(53)SE2. I want to use that feature to catch video traffic from webcams in laptops which can't send dscp values out of the box. This is my test config to check if the function is working: catch every traffic from my workstation for testing, access-list 101 permit ip any any, class-map match-all CL_TEST
1. I can't see any counters with the command "sh policy-map interface FastEthernet 0/1". Cisco tells that this command is not possible. But how I can see if the policy is working correct?
2. When I did the configuration I can't see any packets with dscp af41 on the out going interface on the switch with "sh mls qos int gi0/1 statistic" as I expected. After reloading the switch I see the pakets with af41. Okay for that moment. But.After that I changed something in the policy-map. Only "set ip dscp ef" for a second test.
Generating some traffic I see only packets with af41 as before I changed the policy-map. No traffic with ef on the outgoing interface.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2013
Unable to limit traffic on catalyst 3750 gigabit ports it has fiber modules,
I want to limit traffic 2mb per port
I have tried srr-queue and policier but it is not working and there is no ratelimit command under any interface, Applying policy to output is not supported of the interface
policy-map rate-limit
class class-default
police 2000000 8000 exceed-action drop
int gi1/0/3
service-policy input rate-limit
still when I start download it goes to 10 mbps
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jan 6, 2013
interface Vlan24
description Internal Wireless Internet
ip address 10.x.0.1 255.255.254.0
[Code]....
So, I am trying to limit the bandwidth used by this vlan. The service-policy output statement works, the service-policy input statement does not. My test is to get on that vlan and go to speedtest.net. My download speeds are about 3.5Mb/s, my upload speeds are about 20Mb/s.
it has something to do with this:
sh mls qos ip
QoS Summary [IPv4]: (* - shared aggregates, Mod - switch module Sid - Switch Id)
Int Sid Mod Dir Class-map DSCP Agg Trust Fl AgForward-By AgPoliced-By
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2012
I have a collapsed core design with routed ports between all components. Access layer switches, data center switches, core/aggregation. All routed (no spanning-tree at all).Now...I have to add an IBM BladeCenter with a BNT layer 3 switch to my topology. However, those nasties don't seem to support routed ports.How can I have a routed port on my cisco switch and a standard access port on the BNT and still establish an adjacency with an SVI? I am running OSPF, but I am labbing this in my home lab with 2 x 3550s and EIGRP.
On SW2:
*Mar 1 00:57:00.711: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Vlan100 nbr 10.1.1.1
*Mar 1 00:57:00.711: AS 999, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 interfaceQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
*Mar 1 00:57:02.303: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on Vlan100 nbr 10.1.1.1, retry 9, RTO 5000 tid 0
*Mar 1 00:57:02.303: AS 999, Flags 0x1, Seq 17/0 interfaceQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
[code].....
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2007
Does Catalyst 3550 switch support inter vlan routing ?
View 12 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2012
Is L3 ip routing on by default in 3550s? If so is the "ip routing" command visible in the config file? If no - I assume that one would enable L3 routing with that config command.In general terms are there any IOS devices where ip routing is enabled and one would not see the "ip routing" command in config. I.E. if that command is not visible in the config could you assume there is no L3 capablity in that device?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 18, 2012
The layer 2 switches are connected to layer 3 Switch via trunks, and routing between layer 2 switch ports with configured SVI's on 3550. All working fine. Now I'm trying to configure routing between 2800 and 3550, I tried connecting both Straight Throught and Crossover cables to the 2800 Fa0/0 and Fa0/1 ports as well as the switchports on 3550
No switchport commands are configured however, the lights do not go on for both straight through or crossover cables. I tried connecting 1750 routers but same result. My goal is to have all the VLANS routed to the internet with configuring NAT translation the router.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2012
I have a 3550 l3 switch configured as follows:
vlan 10 ports 1-10
vlan 21 ports 11-20
vlan 30 port 21-30
vlan 40 ports 31-40
default vlan should be vlan 21
I have the servers, switch and router connected to vlan 21. Vlan 21 works great I can browse the internet, but I cannot ping any other vlans. router is connected to fa0/19
[code]
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 4833 bytes
!
version 12.2
no service pad
[code]....
View 11 Replies
View Related
Mar 10, 2013
I'm having some problems setting up vlans to talk to each other on a 3550-12T switch. Its quite a simple setup I have, but I need to split my network up.
Currently I have a network of 192.168.25.0 255.255.255.0 I want to create a new vlan network of 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.0 So I have configured my vlan1 (default vlan) to have an ip of 192.168.25.250 for getting to the management page
I have created a vlan2 of 192.168.30.1 255.255.255.0 ?I have a port 10 linked to one of my 3560G's?In port 9 which is on vlan2 I have my pc plugged in with a static ip of 192.168.30.50 from the router I can ping any device on 192.168.25.x.
I can not ping 192.168.30.1 (which is my vlan2) nor can i ping the PC.
I have enabled ip routing But I dont have a default route, this is becase we don't have a router on the network.
View 18 Replies
View Related
Dec 2, 2011
I've been working with these two Cisco devices in my home off and on for several months now but I just can't take it anymore, I'm about to throw them away and go back to Linksys router.
I have a Cisco 2600 Router with only one Ethernet card in it so I have to trunk from my 3550 Switch to that device. I'd like to have my ISP and all users plug into switch and all trunk back to the router's sub interfaces. Currently, I have started over...again, and am unable to simply get the router and switch to ping each other if I put sub-interfaces on the router. See my configs:
2600 ROUTER:
Router#sho run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 555 bytes
[code]......
3550 SWITCH:
Switch#sho run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2302 bytes
!
version 12.2
[code]..........
Port F0/24 is in VLAN 1, as are all ports but Port F0/1 which is my desktop PC. I mocked it up in Packet Tracer and it works just fine. This is just a simple setup and I'm making sure I can ping between switch and router before I move to each next step.
View 40 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2012
The situation include 2 cisco routers an 2 switch 3550
so we have Router A in Vlan x access ----->Sw1----Trunk----Sw2<------Vlan y Access Router B I 've to enable rip1 on guys A and B ONLY !!! Avoiding any kind of tunnel I though it was all around fallBAck bridging ... but after days of tries ...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2011
We're looking at implementing a new phone system which will use voice over ip. Currently we have a mixture of Cisco 3750 and Cisco 3550 switches which don't support power over ethernet. Its been suggested we could continue using the current switches and power the new phones using power adapters.
Int terms of implementing qos (we don't have any at the moment) for the voice will a Cisco 3550 be OK and will having a mixture of different models using 3550 and 3750 pose any challenges with the qos policy for the voice. I believe there are differences in that the Cisco 3550 doesn't support srr-queues but having little experience with qos I'm not sure what impact this will have if any?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2011
I am having issues working on my QOS between 4510 and 3550 switch connecting on layer 3 through a service provider. I have class maps and policy map setup on both sides and then policy map attached to interfaces however i dont see any traffic matching in policy map on 3550 switch, i do see some traffic matching on 4510 but the speed with which its increasing has my doubts about it. When i make voip calls ( VOIP switches are sitting behind 3550 and are mainly 3550 pwr 24 port switches with phone ports configured for auto qos voip cisco-phone and trusting cos) i rarely see the RTP matching in class under policy map.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 17, 2013
im trying to install a ios 12.2v on my switch. when the screen prompt it does not show me the user move symbol " SW1> ". all i see is " SW:" and from there i can not enter the commands to download from tftp server !
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2013
I would like to know how to stack 2 switch cisco 3550 that IOS C3550-ipservicesk9-mz.122-44.SE6
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2012
we have two core swiches 6506 and around 55 cat 3550 switches. currently we are on the process of replacing the cat 3550 switches to 3750 switches.We need 10/1000/1000 speed, ip base image with upgrade options. Our up links from cat 3550s(sfps) are single mode and dual mode fiber mode with 1 gbps ports on core switch.
At present we are not upgrading to 10 gb modules on core. Spread over 15 floors each floor needs 2 up links(single mode , and dual mode). since cat 3750 sfps are smaller in size existing gibics cannot be used. Looking for the best option of cat 3750 switches with 1 gb up links which can be upgraded to 10 gb later when we replace the modle on core. Requirements:
1- Cat 3750 switches 55 in no with sfps for 1 gb up link (dual mode fiber and single mode fiber)
2- stacking option
3- 10/100/1000 speed
4- ip base image upgradable to ip service image
5- ipv6 compatibaility. Network is spread over 15 floors so from each floor we need two sfp up links 1 gbps using dual mode and single mode
-6-Should be upgradable to 10 gb in future when we upgrade the core modules
Or is it better to go for 10 gb module in core as well as edge switches ? if so what should be the modules?
View 13 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2008
I have one 3550 switch and i upgraded from 12.1 to 12.2(44)SE . But "tclsh" command is not enabled on this version. As per Cisco, 12.2(25)S is enough to enable TCL interpreter.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 26, 2012
How do I configuring Private Class A [10.206.90.0/24] and Private Class C [192.168.1.0/24] Network on Cisco 3550-12G Switch.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2012
I was trying to config qos on 3550 interface
Match protocol is not supported for this interface
So does this mean that qos is not supported on 3550?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 5, 2012
confirm whether the Catalyst 3550 with IOS Rel. 12.2(44)SE is compliant with POE IEEE 802.3af? I see some conflicting informaiton on Cisco's web site. Before Release 12.1(22)EA2, Catalyst 3550 PoE-capable switches (without intelligent power management support) caused high-power powered devices that supported intelligent power management to operate in low-power mode. Devices in low-power mode are not fully functional.
IEEE 802.3af—The major features of this standard are powered-device discovery, power administration, disconnect detection, and optional powered-device power classification. For more information, see the standard.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2012
We had re-arranged and purchased new public ips and changed with new modem. Following is the new network setup diag
I have started the configuration, but stucks at a point. Current configurations setup and ip assigment is as follows
ISP modem/router(192.168.3.254)-->(192.168.3.1)1811W Router(192.168.2.254)-->(192.168.2.1)3550(interface vlan 10 - 10.0.1.254, interface vlan 192 - 192.168.1.254)--trunk-->2950
1)Configured 3550 as layer 3 switch and create a default route to 192.168.2.254
2) Configured 2 static routes(for 2 vlan range traffic) and one default route to 192.168.3.254
3) ip pass through is not configured yet, still the public ip is configured at the isp router
1811 static route configs
------------------------------------
Ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.3.254
Ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1
Ip route 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1
3550 static route config
--------------------------------------
Ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.254
Testing results 1)All lan communications are working fine(inter vlan also), ping to all servers from router is getting and ping to outside public ips are getting from router,but not getting ping from switch 3550 to 192.168.3.254 and any of the public ips(internet).
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2012
I have an Cisco 3550 48 SMI running IOS (tm) C3550 Software (C3550-I9Q3L2-M), Version 12.1(13)EA1a. Software advisor says that I can only update to Version 12.1(22). The software download area tells me that the latest version is 12.2(44).
know if I could use the latest 12.2? Or has the hardware changed with the IOS versions?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 19, 2012
Cisco 3560 does not support "set ip next-hop verify-availabilty". I need this command in my config. "set ip next-hop" do not do the same job.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2012
When mutiple Policy based routing configured on 7600 routers, did the router performace degraded with the number of policy based routing rules?Also, did 7600 running 12.x use per-flow based routing or per packet based routing?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2012
If client gateway = 192.168.64.9 then next-hop = 192.168.64.8 else use default-route 0.0.0.0
I know it's possible to do a route-map match ip-address ACL list. But is it possible to match on gateway?
Some info about hardware and config:
6509-E in VSS (IOS 12.2(17r)SX5) withVS-S720-10G supervisor.
All routes are static, IP for 192.168.64.9 is on SVI vlan.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 24, 2012
I have a 1941 router configured for Policy based routing with two ISPs.Two static default routes configured to point the gateways of respoective ISPs with same metric.But the problem is, packets are going throug the one ISP only while doing traceroute.
N/W connectivity:
ISP1-----> <----------------------> LAN1
| Router |
ISP-------> <----------------------> LAN 2
Below is my configuration :
Current configuration : 5958 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 05:18:56 UTC Mon Jun 25 2012
!
version 15.0
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
[code]....
View 26 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2011
I have a simple design with 3750. I configured a route-map which define a next hop. I defined this route-map on a policy on a vlan interface.When I test some ping and a debug ip policy and it seems that my policy never match.Is there any mechanism that prevent the switch from using PBR? I think of CEF .
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2013
In our datacenter we have a 3750 stack with IP base image. I have enabled PBR and reloaded the switch. Show sdm prefer says i am using default template. The reason i want to use PBR is that we have 2 firewalls on the same work and want to be able to have granular control over which gateway out of the network they use but still be able to access all internal resouces accross wan and locally.
Created access list to identify traffic:
access-list 10 permit 10.2.3.59 (test workstation on vlan 3)
Created policy:
route-map TestASA permit 10
match ip address 10
set ip next-hop 10.2.0.3
Assigned policy to the user vlan3:
ip policy route-map TestASA
Results:It changed the default gateway to the above gateway but i could not access any resources on any other vlan, could not access resouces accross wan.
View 16 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2012
I have tried to make policy based routing on Cisco 3560. I use ipservices ios (SW version 12.2.(50)SE3 and SW-IMAGE C3560-IPSERVICESK9-M) For below configuration there is no problem and pbr is working.
“Access-list 100 permit ip host 1.1.1.1 host 2.2.2.2
Access-list 101 permit ip host 1.1.1.1 host 3.3.3.3
Route-map pbr1 permit 10
Match ip address 100
Set ip next-hop verify-availability 1.1.1.2 1 track 11
interface fasthethernet 0/1
ip policy route-map pbr1”
But when i add another sequence to the "pbr1" with another sequence number like that.
“Route-map pbr1 permit 11
Match ip address 101
Set ip next-hop verify-availability 1.1.1.3 1 track 12”
pbr is not working. Switch gives message "PLATFORM_PBR-3-UNSUPPORTTED_RMP:Route-map pbr1 not supported for Policy Based Routing”"ip policy route-map pbr1" command not shown in the running config. And "show ip policy" output is blank.Configuration guide says you have insert many sequence to the route-map with the same name. And also this command is not in the unsupported command list.
View 16 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2012
I have a simple design with 3750.I configured a route-map which define a next hop.I defined this route-map on a policy on a vlan interface.When I test some ping and a debug ip policy and it seems that my policy never match.Is there any mechanism that prevent the switch from using PBR?
View 10 Replies
View Related
May 10, 2012
I have problem while implementing policy based routing with a firewall. Let me explain in detail.
I have 2 remote site(Site A-small , Site B - Big) , Site B is connected with HQ with Tunnels 1 and 2 , Site B and Site A is connected with Tunnel 9941.
What I want is: Scenirio for Communication :
1)Site A--------->VPN Router Site B-----------> FW-------------->VPN Router Site B------------------>Central Site
2)Central Site--------->VPN Router Site B-----------> FW---------->VPN Router Site B-------------->Site A
3)Site B--------->FW-------------------->VPN Router Site B------>Central Site
4)Central Site--------->VPN Router Site B-------------------->FW------>Site B
5)Site A--------->VPN Router Site B-----------> Site B(no firewall)
6)Site B--------->VPN Router Site B-----------> Site A(no firewall)
Tunnel 1: 10.13.199.1-2
Tunnel 2: 10.13.199.1-2
Tunnel9941: 172.22.99.1-2
Site A LAN- 10.99.41.0/24
Site B LAN- 10.99.0.0/16
Central LAN - 10.18.0.0/16
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2012
I am having a problem with PBR done on a 7604-S router - It seems like it is not done in harware. I have an Iperf client and an Iperf server, and would like to test the performance of 7600 router for PBR, supervisor is RSP720-3C-G and used interface card is 7600-ES20-GE3C ESM20G.
I have read numerous discussions about PBR that is supposed to happen in hardware when you use it with matching access-list and set ip next-hop.Although, when I start the iperf, the 7600 cpu is hitting the 80-90 % boundary, and transfer bandwidth can't go over 120-130 Mbit/s.The IP Policy is applied on an interface part of vrf ONE maybe this is casing the problem... ?
The diagram and configuration follows:
Configuration:
c7604#sh run
boot system flash disk0:c7600rsp72043-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRE2.bin
!
ip vrf one
[Code]...
View 8 Replies
View Related
