Cisco Switching/Routing :: QOS Between 4510 And 3550?
Oct 31, 2011
I am having issues working on my QOS between 4510 and 3550 switch connecting on layer 3 through a service provider. I have class maps and policy map setup on both sides and then policy map attached to interfaces however i dont see any traffic matching in policy map on 3550 switch, i do see some traffic matching on 4510 but the speed with which its increasing has my doubts about it. When i make voip calls ( VOIP switches are sitting behind 3550 and are mainly 3550 pwr 24 port switches with phone ports configured for auto qos voip cisco-phone and trusting cos) i rarely see the RTP matching in class under policy map.
I am currently running 12.2 (53) and am looking to move up to the 15+ train. Are there any pre-reqs prior to the upgrade that any one is aware of?Unfortunately I have no "lab environment" to test it in. I have production switches with minimal impact to the campus and if done late night I could have it restored back before open of business the following morning. My FW is up to the latest version and I have found nothing in the release notes specifically stating that there would require any stepped upgrades up to v15 and higher.
We have an issue where switches are failing weekly in a switch closet. In the past month we have gone through several 3750G switches and a couple 4510s. The power supplies have eventually made a popping noise and had to be replaced. on the 4510s we've tried two chassis and gone through several power supplies.The switches have been behind UPS systems so should be receiving conditioned power.Could load from the PoE devices really be causing this? I wouldn't think it's power since they are behind a UPS.
This has been happening repeatedly time to time! we just replace the part! But now it has come to trouble us again.It happening only in one module like 6 to 10 ports wont work.
we run IOS cat4500e-universalk9.SPA.03.02.00.SG.150-2.SG.bin will there be any bug in it?
I have two servers on one subnet that each need to replicate to a single server on another subnet. They also need to replicate to each other. This replication is unidirectional so I will refer to the 2 server subnet as the source subnet and the single server subnet as the destination subnet. In order to keep this replication running without killing the MPLS links on either end, we are trying to use a policy-map that limits bandwidth from the source subnet.The Problem:We have created a policy that polices traffic during specific times of day and limits the bandwidth as prescribed, however, bandwidth is also being limited between the 2 servers on the source subnet which is not needed or desired.Class 512K set dscp ef police 1024000 bps 1024000 byte conform-action transmit exceed-action dropClass Map match-any 512K (id 4) Match access-group name DAGExtended IP access list DAG 10 permit ip host 10.20.0.3 host 10.20.0.10 time-range DAG-REP (active) (22793 matches) 20 permit ip host 10.20.0.4 host 10.20.0.10 time-range DAG-REP (active) (14156 matches)The service policy is applied on the input side of the 2 interfaces on which our devices are connected.As you can see, the access list identifies the interesting traffic as traffic from two specific hosts to one specific host. The problem we are having is that bandwidth is also being throttled between the two source hosts even though it is not defined to do so.What can I do to limit traffic from the two source devices to the single destination device without limiting bandwidth between the two source devices?
We have multiple switches(Cisco 4510, 4507R, 3560's) within our network. I've been looking over the port settings between them and noticed that not all ports that are connected directly from switch to switch are trunked the same. Some are desirable on one switch and forced truck on the other switch.
I am using Cisco 4510 Switch with Default LAN Base image. Now I have purchased 10G Upgrade license. The part number for Upgrade license is WS-C4500-10G-LIC. I have received a CD from Cisco (named as 'Includes License and Warranty'). Any License upgradation is required for this license? Or this is only a paper License.
I could not find out any .lic file on the CD. Also there is no paper with PAK.
I just upgraded all of our switches on campus to Version 15.0(2)SG4 after about a month of testing. On two switches so far, we are seeing that clients can not connect, and the switch isnt detecting a link. I dont see anything out of the ordinary in int status, port-security, or errors on the interface. Plugging in a different computer does nothing. Only thing that works, is a shut, no shut of the interface. After that, its connected.
I have a Catalyst 4510 that is running IOS version 15.X that has a bug and Cisco recommends upgrading the IOS. Are there additional steps required to perform an IOS upgrade due to licencing Cisco put in place?
I am planning to enable MAC address filtering (one port on 4510 & another 3560). I want to allow only that MAC address to communicate via that port with the rest of the network and internet.
4510 has PC connected and 3560 had polycom connected. [code]
I got a 6509 version 12.1(22)E2 that I am replacing with a 4510E version 3.40SG with Supervisor Engine 7-E. The 6509 is configured with 20 channel-group for dual fiver connection to ten 3550 switches with trunking enabled with isl encapsulation. The 6509 is the VTP server to each of the 3550 switch clients. There are 40 Microsoft Servers attached ot the Gig RJ45 port modules.
I have attached the 4510 to the 6509 with dual fiber connection configured as a channel group with trunking enabled. I am configuring the 4510 the same as the 6509 except I have to use trunking with dot1q encapsulation because isl is not supported on the 4510. I no longer want to use VTP with the 4510 and have set the it as transparent mode. Each of the 3550 switches are changed from isl trunking encapsulation to dot1q and VTP mode is changed to transparent when they are moved from the 6509 to the 4510.
I want to move the switches over a few at a time and not all at once. The first 4 switches attached with no problems and ran with no problems for the user access to the servers still on the 6509 for a week. Then I found out DHCP was not working for the devices attached to the switches on the 4510. I moved one of our domain controllers form the 6509 to the 4510 to fix the DHVP problem. I have now added 2 more switches with users that use an application on a server still on the 6509 and they are getting disconnect errors after logging into it and using it. Other applications on different server also on the 6509 are having no problems. I moved the switches back to the 6509 to get the users up during business hours. I now plan on moving the server for the application that was failing to the 4510 in hopes that it will fix the problem.
Is there something I can do to speed up the connection between the 6509 and the 4510 so I can continue this transition without having to move the servers to the 4510 as I move the users?
We are facing issue related to STP.I am getting MAC FLAP error on Cisco 4510 switch. The effect on network is intermittent Pkt drops in the network. When I checked the specific Ip address I am getting the same with two different. [code] Vlan is created on CORE switch and assign priority 0 than CORE switch should be the Root. but instead Root port is becoming the port where server is connected. Server at last connected to CORE switch via HP switch via other Vlan to CORE switch and creating a loop as shown in Diag. [code] The Priority of Vlan 102 is changed and Root port has been changed due to that. The Bridge ID is the same as CORE switch.
I am planning on deploying a 2960 switch and will need to uplink it to a 4510 switch. There are 2 TenGig Ports available and I was thinking of uplinking one of them to the 1Gb SFP port on the 2960. Would this work?
I am looking to find a command or counter to tell me if a cisco switch port on a 4510 was ever up and passed traffic. I want to shutdown all unused switchports on our access switches. But before I do that I need to make sure device is just not off or the person is away on vacation. If I do sh int interface, is there a counter I can reference.
I have configured Span port on our 4510. We have an application 5view server to monitor trafic connected to G9/17 Since we have changed the network connection from physical Giga port and add a Port-channel instead, we don't see any more trafic from the new Port-channel to G9/17
We are getting below errors on our Cisco 4500 Switche PS after Power Down activity.
Switch1
------------------ show power detail ------------------
Power Fan Inline Supply Model No Type Status Sensor Status ------ ---------------- --------- ----------- ------- ------- PS1 PWR-C45-4200ACV AC 4200W good good good PS1-1 off PS1-2 220V good PS2 PWR-C45-4200ACV AC 4200W err-disable good good PS2-1 220V good PS2-2 220V good
*** Power Supplies of different type have been detected***
00:01:02: %C4K_CHASSIS-3-MIXINPOWERDETECTED: Power supplies in the chassis are of different types (AC/DC) or wattage(code)
I'm having some trouble with a 4510 Switch Line Card. I need some recomendations for troubleshooting it.We have some PoE phones connected to the card number 3. When those phones were restarted, they did not go up again. In order to discard wiring issues, we connected the phone directly to the card 3, and the phone did not go up. If the phone is connected to a different card, it goes up correctly.
Additionally, to restore the service, these phones were migrated to other cards, but when we disconnect the equipment, ports in line card 3 remain in an up / up state (and nothing is connected to those ports!!), and only reflect the actual state after restarting the port.What steps could I do in order to troubleshoot this issue?. What should I look for, or how do I discriminate the problem? Might it be a hardware issue, a PoE issue?
I have a collapsed core design with routed ports between all components. Access layer switches, data center switches, core/aggregation. All routed (no spanning-tree at all).Now...I have to add an IBM BladeCenter with a BNT layer 3 switch to my topology. However, those nasties don't seem to support routed ports.How can I have a routed port on my cisco switch and a standard access port on the BNT and still establish an adjacency with an SVI? I am running OSPF, but I am labbing this in my home lab with 2 x 3550s and EIGRP.
On SW2: *Mar 1 00:57:00.711: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Vlan100 nbr 10.1.1.1 *Mar 1 00:57:00.711: AS 999, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 interfaceQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1 *Mar 1 00:57:02.303: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on Vlan100 nbr 10.1.1.1, retry 9, RTO 5000 tid 0 *Mar 1 00:57:02.303: AS 999, Flags 0x1, Seq 17/0 interfaceQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
Is L3 ip routing on by default in 3550s? If so is the "ip routing" command visible in the config file? If no - I assume that one would enable L3 routing with that config command.In general terms are there any IOS devices where ip routing is enabled and one would not see the "ip routing" command in config. I.E. if that command is not visible in the config could you assume there is no L3 capablity in that device?
The layer 2 switches are connected to layer 3 Switch via trunks, and routing between layer 2 switch ports with configured SVI's on 3550. All working fine. Now I'm trying to configure routing between 2800 and 3550, I tried connecting both Straight Throught and Crossover cables to the 2800 Fa0/0 and Fa0/1 ports as well as the switchports on 3550
No switchport commands are configured however, the lights do not go on for both straight through or crossover cables. I tried connecting 1750 routers but same result. My goal is to have all the VLANS routed to the internet with configuring NAT translation the router.
vlan 10 ports 1-10 vlan 21 ports 11-20 vlan 30 port 21-30 vlan 40 ports 31-40 default vlan should be vlan 21
I have the servers, switch and router connected to vlan 21. Vlan 21 works great I can browse the internet, but I cannot ping any other vlans. router is connected to fa0/19
[code] Building configuration... Current configuration : 4833 bytes ! version 12.2 no service pad
I'm having some problems setting up vlans to talk to each other on a 3550-12T switch. Its quite a simple setup I have, but I need to split my network up.
Currently I have a network of 192.168.25.0 255.255.255.0 I want to create a new vlan network of 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.0 So I have configured my vlan1 (default vlan) to have an ip of 192.168.25.250 for getting to the management page
I have created a vlan2 of 192.168.30.1 255.255.255.0 ?I have a port 10 linked to one of my 3560G's?In port 9 which is on vlan2 I have my pc plugged in with a static ip of 192.168.30.50 from the router I can ping any device on 192.168.25.x.
I can not ping 192.168.30.1 (which is my vlan2) nor can i ping the PC.
I have enabled ip routing But I dont have a default route, this is becase we don't have a router on the network.
I've been working with these two Cisco devices in my home off and on for several months now but I just can't take it anymore, I'm about to throw them away and go back to Linksys router.
I have a Cisco 2600 Router with only one Ethernet card in it so I have to trunk from my 3550 Switch to that device. I'd like to have my ISP and all users plug into switch and all trunk back to the router's sub interfaces. Currently, I have started over...again, and am unable to simply get the router and switch to ping each other if I put sub-interfaces on the router. See my configs:
2600 ROUTER: Router#sho run Building configuration... Current configuration : 555 bytes [code]......
3550 SWITCH: Switch#sho run Building configuration... Current configuration : 2302 bytes ! version 12.2 [code]..........
Port F0/24 is in VLAN 1, as are all ports but Port F0/1 which is my desktop PC. I mocked it up in Packet Tracer and it works just fine. This is just a simple setup and I'm making sure I can ping between switch and router before I move to each next step.
The situation include 2 cisco routers an 2 switch 3550
so we have Router A in Vlan x access ----->Sw1----Trunk----Sw2<------Vlan y Access Router B I 've to enable rip1 on guys A and B ONLY !!! Avoiding any kind of tunnel I though it was all around fallBAck bridging ... but after days of tries ...
We're looking at implementing a new phone system which will use voice over ip. Currently we have a mixture of Cisco 3750 and Cisco 3550 switches which don't support power over ethernet. Its been suggested we could continue using the current switches and power the new phones using power adapters.
Int terms of implementing qos (we don't have any at the moment) for the voice will a Cisco 3550 be OK and will having a mixture of different models using 3550 and 3750 pose any challenges with the qos policy for the voice. I believe there are differences in that the Cisco 3550 doesn't support srr-queues but having little experience with qos I'm not sure what impact this will have if any?
im trying to install a ios 12.2v on my switch. when the screen prompt it does not show me the user move symbol " SW1> ". all i see is " SW:" and from there i can not enter the commands to download from tftp server !
I received the following info from Cisco's TAC and wanted to inquire further before I start reconfiguring the switch:
In a redundant Sup-6E setup, the following configuration is supported :
- 1 TenGig uplink on Active Sup and 1 TenGig uplink on Standby Sup - 1 TenGig uplink on Active Sup and 2 Gig uplinks on Standby Sup - 2 Gig uplinks on Active Sup and 1 TenGig uplink on Standby Sup - 2 Gig uplink on Active Sup and 2 Gig uplinks on Standby Sup
If you invoke shared backplane mode, the following configuration can also be supported:
- 2 TenGig uplinks(blocking) on Active Sup and 2 TenGig uplinks on Standby Sup - 2 TenGig uplink(blocking) on Active Sup and 4 Gig uplinks on Standby Sup - 4 Gig uplinks on Active Sup and 2 TenGig uplinks(blocking) on Standby Sup - 4 Gig uplink on Active Sup and 4 Gig uplinks on Standby Sup
Here's the command and information about the "shared-backplane" mode :- [URL]
Currently, we have 2 SUP 6-Es(Module 5 - Active and Module 6 - Stand-by) setup in a redundent mode. I am planning on changing the redundent mode to the shared backplane mode so I can use 2 TenGig converters to uplink 2 access-switches. We purchased 2 TenGig converters and here is how I am planning on using them:
1- One will be used to uplink to two 3750 switches(stacked) 2- One will be used to uplink to a 2960 using a Gig SFP
My questions are:
1- Do I have to install the 2 TenGig converters(4-Gig Uplinks) in the same Module? Or can I use one one in module 5 and the second one in module 6? 2- Will changing the redundant mode to the shared backplane mode require rebooting the switch or disrupt the funtionality of the other linecards?
