Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3550 QOS For Voice Over IP
Oct 25, 2011
We're looking at implementing a new phone system which will use voice over ip. Currently we have a mixture of Cisco 3750 and Cisco 3550 switches which don't support power over ethernet. Its been suggested we could continue using the current switches and power the new phones using power adapters.
Int terms of implementing qos (we don't have any at the moment) for the voice will a Cisco 3550 be OK and will having a mixture of different models using 3550 and 3750 pose any challenges with the qos policy for the voice. I believe there are differences in that the Cisco 3550 doesn't support srr-queues but having little experience with qos I'm not sure what impact this will have if any?
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Nov 4, 2011
I am facing Voice Quality issue in Cisco Ip phone. However I don’t have any issue while calling between extension in the same Site. I am facing voice quality issue while traffic flowing through the MPLS over GRE tunnel. Its working fine If I am removing the mls Qos in Cisco 3550 Interface.
[Code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2011
Why aren't the fa ports that i assign to a voice vlan showing up when i issue show vlan?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2012
I have a collapsed core design with routed ports between all components. Access layer switches, data center switches, core/aggregation. All routed (no spanning-tree at all).Now...I have to add an IBM BladeCenter with a BNT layer 3 switch to my topology. However, those nasties don't seem to support routed ports.How can I have a routed port on my cisco switch and a standard access port on the BNT and still establish an adjacency with an SVI? I am running OSPF, but I am labbing this in my home lab with 2 x 3550s and EIGRP.
On SW2:
*Mar 1 00:57:00.711: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Vlan100 nbr 10.1.1.1
*Mar 1 00:57:00.711: AS 999, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 interfaceQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
*Mar 1 00:57:02.303: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on Vlan100 nbr 10.1.1.1, retry 9, RTO 5000 tid 0
*Mar 1 00:57:02.303: AS 999, Flags 0x1, Seq 17/0 interfaceQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
[code].....
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2007
Does Catalyst 3550 switch support inter vlan routing ?
View 12 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2012
Is L3 ip routing on by default in 3550s? If so is the "ip routing" command visible in the config file? If no - I assume that one would enable L3 routing with that config command.In general terms are there any IOS devices where ip routing is enabled and one would not see the "ip routing" command in config. I.E. if that command is not visible in the config could you assume there is no L3 capablity in that device?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 18, 2012
The layer 2 switches are connected to layer 3 Switch via trunks, and routing between layer 2 switch ports with configured SVI's on 3550. All working fine. Now I'm trying to configure routing between 2800 and 3550, I tried connecting both Straight Throught and Crossover cables to the 2800 Fa0/0 and Fa0/1 ports as well as the switchports on 3550
No switchport commands are configured however, the lights do not go on for both straight through or crossover cables. I tried connecting 1750 routers but same result. My goal is to have all the VLANS routed to the internet with configuring NAT translation the router.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2012
I have a 3550 l3 switch configured as follows:
vlan 10 ports 1-10
vlan 21 ports 11-20
vlan 30 port 21-30
vlan 40 ports 31-40
default vlan should be vlan 21
I have the servers, switch and router connected to vlan 21. Vlan 21 works great I can browse the internet, but I cannot ping any other vlans. router is connected to fa0/19
[code]
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 4833 bytes
!
version 12.2
no service pad
[code]....
View 11 Replies
View Related
Mar 10, 2013
I'm having some problems setting up vlans to talk to each other on a 3550-12T switch. Its quite a simple setup I have, but I need to split my network up.
Currently I have a network of 192.168.25.0 255.255.255.0 I want to create a new vlan network of 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.0 So I have configured my vlan1 (default vlan) to have an ip of 192.168.25.250 for getting to the management page
I have created a vlan2 of 192.168.30.1 255.255.255.0 ?I have a port 10 linked to one of my 3560G's?In port 9 which is on vlan2 I have my pc plugged in with a static ip of 192.168.30.50 from the router I can ping any device on 192.168.25.x.
I can not ping 192.168.30.1 (which is my vlan2) nor can i ping the PC.
I have enabled ip routing But I dont have a default route, this is becase we don't have a router on the network.
View 18 Replies
View Related
Dec 2, 2011
I've been working with these two Cisco devices in my home off and on for several months now but I just can't take it anymore, I'm about to throw them away and go back to Linksys router.
I have a Cisco 2600 Router with only one Ethernet card in it so I have to trunk from my 3550 Switch to that device. I'd like to have my ISP and all users plug into switch and all trunk back to the router's sub interfaces. Currently, I have started over...again, and am unable to simply get the router and switch to ping each other if I put sub-interfaces on the router. See my configs:
2600 ROUTER:
Router#sho run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 555 bytes
[code]......
3550 SWITCH:
Switch#sho run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2302 bytes
!
version 12.2
[code]..........
Port F0/24 is in VLAN 1, as are all ports but Port F0/1 which is my desktop PC. I mocked it up in Packet Tracer and it works just fine. This is just a simple setup and I'm making sure I can ping between switch and router before I move to each next step.
View 40 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2012
I have a customer who has a Cisco 2821 router with software 2821/HSEC/K9 and they wish to upgrade to C2821-VSEC-SRST/K9.From my understanding they want to use the same router but install an IOS with the capabilites it has at the moment but with voice. [code]How do I go about pricing this up and what upgrade sku's will do this?I am not to worried about the memory.Is it just a simple ios upgrade as the srst licenses are on a trust basis?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2006
Had problems with voice quality on VoIP with 4500 series switches and the qos dbl feature (which gets enabled by the auto qos feature)?? I have had a couple of customer complaining about voice quality and our voice team spent a lot of time investigating; I had ruled out the network infrastructure because it was all QOS enabled. The voip people came up against a blank so I looked at the network once more and disbaled dbl with hope more than anything else. Mysteriously the voice quality issues the customer was having have now disappeared. Not sure whether a coincidence (though I have done this on two customers now) or something to with with dbl. There is nothing on this on cco.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 4, 2011
I'm using CISCO 3524 switch as access switch and trying to enable voice vlan in fast eth ports as below.
L3 vlans are created in core switches which is cisco 6509
vlan 1 - data vlan
vlan 2 - voice vlan
in cisco 3524
[code]....
if i use the above configs, the phone which is connected to interface fa0/1 is not taking ip from dhcp server. even it didn't work with static configs.while troubelshooting, i have configured as below and it's started working..
int fa0/1
switchport acces vlan 2
speed 100
duplex full.
in this case i can't use this port for data connectivity where as it's required for data too.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2012
I have cisco2811 and HWIC-1CE1T1-PRI in the main office are using to connect 10 branches ( 10 ISDN lines) for Data.
I have available channels in the used E1 so I can use them for voice using PVDM2-64 ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 9, 2012
I have CME on Router 2800 series, and switch 2960 PoE connected to this router.On 2960 switch, there is existing 7945 IP Phone that already work properly and get IP 14.x.x.x from voice vlan 2.
Problem is when I add cisco 6921 IP Phone connect to 2960 switch, it get data vlan 10.x.x.x, not voice Vlan 14.x.x.x I have check CDP and it use CDP v2
Config on 2960:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/34 <--- this is connected to IP Phone 7945
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 2
spanning-tree portfast
[code]....
With same config and condition on port 2960, why the IP Phone 6921 can't get voice vlan 14.x.x.x, whereas IP Phone 7945 can get voice vlan 14.x.x.x
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 10, 2012
I have encountered a different issue. When I configure " switchport voice vlan 2" under f0/2 connected to ip phone, it does not have any effect.
Below is my set up:
Sw is cisco cat 3524 XL.
ip phone-------f0/2( vlan1)-----SW----f0/1---trunk------f0/0-CME-router+dhcp
|
f0/3( vlan2)
tftp server ( 201.201.201.3)
switch has two vlans:
vlan1 (data) 200.200.200.0/24
vlan 2 (voice) 201.201.201.0/24
Switch management int vlan 1 : 200.200.200.3
router
f0/0.1 200.200.200.1
f0/0.2 201.201.201.1
The trunk is working correctly. (code)
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 4, 2012
Wireless Phone --> 881W router --> VPN --> ASA5510 --> LAN with CCM and Voice Gateway
Phone registers to CCM Internal calls work External calls connect but get no voice in either direction
View 13 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2012
The situation include 2 cisco routers an 2 switch 3550
so we have Router A in Vlan x access ----->Sw1----Trunk----Sw2<------Vlan y Access Router B I 've to enable rip1 on guys A and B ONLY !!! Avoiding any kind of tunnel I though it was all around fallBAck bridging ... but after days of tries ...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2011
I am having issues working on my QOS between 4510 and 3550 switch connecting on layer 3 through a service provider. I have class maps and policy map setup on both sides and then policy map attached to interfaces however i dont see any traffic matching in policy map on 3550 switch, i do see some traffic matching on 4510 but the speed with which its increasing has my doubts about it. When i make voip calls ( VOIP switches are sitting behind 3550 and are mainly 3550 pwr 24 port switches with phone ports configured for auto qos voip cisco-phone and trusting cos) i rarely see the RTP matching in class under policy map.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 17, 2013
im trying to install a ios 12.2v on my switch. when the screen prompt it does not show me the user move symbol " SW1> ". all i see is " SW:" and from there i can not enter the commands to download from tftp server !
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 18, 2013
I have spent several days tearing my hair out trying to properly configure our small business switch (SG300-10p) for voice. The phones are a relatively new addition and will replace old POTS phones.Our network consists of a 1941 ISR router, the SG300-10P switch, a mac server (handing DHCP, DNS, AFP), 4 client desktops and 4 SGA525G2 IP phones. The router, server, desktops and phones all have their own connection to the switch and the second data ports on the back of the IP phones are not used. We do not have any unified comms devices for voice. Our VOIP solution is hosted by a local SIP provider, and each phone independently registers with the provider's SIP proxy over the internet.
Left almost to it’s own devices (or presumably flat, default settings on VLAN 1), this whole setup works just great. We can TFTP files, make and receive calls, and do all the usual XML stuff. Calls are crystal clear. Even the localisation and directory works. However, I’ve been told several times that to ensure good quality on VOIP calls during periods of busy traffic, I should set up some form of QoS. A Voice VLAN on the switch, I was told, is the best way to do this as it automagically gives priority to the whole voice VLAN over the normal data VLAN.
I have followed instructions in numerous manuals, articles and guides, and have managed to create the Voice VLAN, both manually and automatically (I can watch Smartport detect the phones and see the Auto Voice VLAN add the ports to the VLAN as I connect them). The trouble is, as soon as this happens, the phones lose connectivity with the rest of the network, including the DNS server and the router, and therefore the internet, causing them to lose registration with the SIP service.
I tried adding the server and router ports to the Voice VLAN and tweaking every possible combination of tagged, untagged, excluded, trunk, access, general and PVID settings I can think of (by the way, I have no idea what any of those mean). The switch is in Layer 2 mode, but adding the port connected to the router to all the VLANs does not result in internet connectivity to the phones. I have told the phones to tag frames with the VLAN ID and told them not to. I have tried upgrading firmware and I have rebooted the switch so many times I'm tired of those wretched little flashing lights.
Nothing seems to work. And so I am stuck with everything on VLAN 1. My most recent thought is that the 1941 needs to know about the Voice VLAN (I checked CDP and it knows about the switch), but I’m reluctant to start messing with the router config when this is our production network, at least without knowing what I'm doing. I don’t even know if QoS applies when a Voice VLAN is not set up and we're on VLAN 1, some articles say yes, others say no. And when it is set up right, how does that priority transfer to the router? I’ve looked in the router manual and config options and found something called 802.1Q, but I have no idea what it is, how it works or even if it applies to our situation. Can I forgo VLANs altogether and use QoS some other way, perhaps?I have googled enough to cobble together our setup in IOS up until now. Ideally, I would still like to be able to ssh or https into each device (as I do now) for management, and I’ve read about setting up a another VLAN for config, monitoring etc, but I guess that would mean routing between VLANs in Layer 3.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2013
If we configure a Voice and Data VLAn on a switch. And connect EX90 on voice VLAN and PCwith EX90 terminals. Than can we able to share a presentation or data with EX90 or not?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2011
i am facing a strange issue on cisco 2950 .IOS (tm) C2950 Software (C2950-I6K2L2Q4-M), Version 12.1(22)EA9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) suddenly my phone stopped working for DTMF tone, i mean when i dial a conference bridge lets say 6565 and then it ask for conference bridge code lets say 12345, it doesnt recognize the code and says code is invalid, SIP Proxy is Asterisk in this case.Currently my cisco switch port is configured for dual data + voice vlan, where DTMF dont work, sample config below [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2012
I wanted to know about EHWIC 8-Port configuration? We create Data and Voice VLANs and assign 8 ports to the VLANs. So how do VLANS communicate with each other? We cannot make Gi0/1 as sub interfaces and assign the same subnet IP’s as of VLAN IP’s , it wont accept. On 1921 router Assume Gi0/0 we connect to MPLS WAN. What happens to Gi0/1 where do we connect this?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2013
|_voip PBX___|-----|__3650___|------fiber-------------|__3650_____|------|_voipphone__| I have a case where voipphone is registered on the voippbx but peaple on both end can't hear each other . No ACL on both 3650 , no firewalls between them , distance is about 2 miles . I tried to make telnet x.x.x.x 1720 or 1719 or 1721 (h323 ports) to opposite switch -connection refused . How can test if ports are open on the 3650 ? Is it coorect If I create allowing acl and apply it on both 3650 on the interfaces connected one switch to voippbx "IN" , second switch on the interf connected to voipphone "IN" ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2013
im working in a new enviroment and want to makes some design changes to the environment. I wanted to bounce my ideas some of you folks to see if my thinking is on the right path or maybe i could do things better.
Setup:
Currently the setup that i manage includes and Sonic Wall (also dishes out dhcp), HP 1810 "Core Switch" and 3 SG 300-28P cisco managed switches. (all cisco switches tie back into the HP) The router is managed by the isp. There is only one vlan with all traffic going across it.
Obviously the glaring issue here is that voice and data all reside on the same vlan. Correct me if i am thinking incorrectly but the first step would be to create a separate vlan for the phones with its own IP scheme. currently phones are issued addresses from the 150-200 range and everything else is left for pc's, printers etc. To my knowledge the HP switch does layer 3 but i do not know much about it. There are vpn tunnels to remote offices that are used for sharepoint, email and to access other services. Trying to wrap my mind around the environment as a whole so i may be missing something obvious i could do design wise to improve.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2013
I would like to know how to stack 2 switch cisco 3550 that IOS C3550-ipservicesk9-mz.122-44.SE6
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2012
we have two core swiches 6506 and around 55 cat 3550 switches. currently we are on the process of replacing the cat 3550 switches to 3750 switches.We need 10/1000/1000 speed, ip base image with upgrade options. Our up links from cat 3550s(sfps) are single mode and dual mode fiber mode with 1 gbps ports on core switch.
At present we are not upgrading to 10 gb modules on core. Spread over 15 floors each floor needs 2 up links(single mode , and dual mode). since cat 3750 sfps are smaller in size existing gibics cannot be used. Looking for the best option of cat 3750 switches with 1 gb up links which can be upgraded to 10 gb later when we replace the modle on core. Requirements:
1- Cat 3750 switches 55 in no with sfps for 1 gb up link (dual mode fiber and single mode fiber)
2- stacking option
3- 10/100/1000 speed
4- ip base image upgradable to ip service image
5- ipv6 compatibaility. Network is spread over 15 floors so from each floor we need two sfp up links 1 gbps using dual mode and single mode
-6-Should be upgradable to 10 gb in future when we upgrade the core modules
Or is it better to go for 10 gb module in core as well as edge switches ? if so what should be the modules?
View 13 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2008
I have one 3550 switch and i upgraded from 12.1 to 12.2(44)SE . But "tclsh" command is not enabled on this version. As per Cisco, 12.2(25)S is enough to enable TCL interpreter.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2012
We have a metro Ethernet service, basically our WAN connection, that we use to connect 4 sites. This MOE service has a CIR of 200 Mbps, connected to a port on a 3550-12T running Version 12.1(22)EA5 at 1000 Mbps. We are exceeding our CIR at times during the day for short bursts which is causing the MOE switch to drop packets, which I suspect I am seeing manifest itself in some choppy VoIP conversations and dropped ICMP packets from our network monitoring software. I implemented policy maps to apply an outbound service policy to the interface connected to the MOE service, but I am not seeing any matches to the access lists or the service policy. I’m not sure if I am missing something or perhaps the IOS is not capable?
Below is the config for the service policy and some command output. Notice that there are hits on a statndard access list that is used for other purposes, but the extended access lists used for the class maps have no matches.
!
class-map match-all REALTIME
match access-group name REALTIME
[Code].....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 26, 2012
How do I configuring Private Class A [10.206.90.0/24] and Private Class C [192.168.1.0/24] Network on Cisco 3550-12G Switch.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2012
I was trying to config qos on 3550 interface
Match protocol is not supported for this interface
So does this mean that qos is not supported on 3550?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 5, 2012
confirm whether the Catalyst 3550 with IOS Rel. 12.2(44)SE is compliant with POE IEEE 802.3af? I see some conflicting informaiton on Cisco's web site. Before Release 12.1(22)EA2, Catalyst 3550 PoE-capable switches (without intelligent power management support) caused high-power powered devices that supported intelligent power management to operate in low-power mode. Devices in low-power mode are not fully functional.
IEEE 802.3af—The major features of this standard are powered-device discovery, power administration, disconnect detection, and optional powered-device power classification. For more information, see the standard.
View 2 Replies
View Related
