I have cisco 2960 and Catlyst 4510 switches now we are planning to implement IPV6.
i have the fallowing IOS on my switches.
C2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-50.se5
Cat4500e-entservicesk9-mz.122-54.sg1.bin
The above ios will support for IPV6 or I have to purchase new IOS, which version will support.
I am planning on deploying a 2960 switch and will need to uplink it to a 4510 switch. There are 2 TenGig Ports available and I was thinking of uplinking one of them to the 1Gb SFP port on the 2960. Would this work?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI need to know the 172cisco 1 router support to IPv6 & it support to IPv6 then which IOS is required for it.Also I need to know the cisco 2960 switch is support to IPv6?
View 3 Replies View RelatedTrying to control capacity utilization for guest users connecting to a 2960 switch. No problem for IPv4 users, but IPv6 is giving me fits. What I've found out by trial and error so far implies that there is just enough IPv6 smarts in a WS-C2960-24TT-L running c2960-lanbasek9-mz.150-1.SE to make it impossible to control IPv6 traffic. Blocking IPv6 would be sufficient short term, but MAC filtering on type 0x86DD does not appear to work either. Here are the results I've gotten so far:
What "works":
* Protocol ipv6 or an IPv6 ACL in a class map.
* Using a class map referencing ipv6 protocol or an ipv6 ACL in a policy map.
* IPv4 inbound filters and policing.
* Blocking of IPv4 traffic by a MAC ACL blocking type 0x0800 (IPv4) - note that the docs explicitly state that MAC filters do NOT filter IP traffic, except for on this box on this release they do.
What does not work:
* Applying a policy map referencing a class map referencing protocol ipv6 or an IPv6 ACL to an interface. The service policy is accepted by the parser, but is not inserted into the running configuration.
* "class-default" in a policy map only matches IPv4 traffic, not all other traffic.
* Blocking of IPv6 traffic by a MAC ACL blocking type 0X86DD. No problem applying the access-group to the interface, it just doesn't do anything.
I am aware that this box is not supposed to support IPv6 other than for multicast, but as implemented, this is a hole an abuser could drive a MAC truck through.
My questions:
Is this situation unique to this particular 2960 switch or SW release (I also tried 12.2(58)SE2) or does it afflict all 2960's running LANbase?
Assuming the answers to the first two question are negative, what is the minimum requirement to get working IPv6 policing in an edge switch?
I am having WS-C3560G-48TS switch with ios(c3560-ipbasek9-mz.122-58.E2.bin) and I am trying to use IPv6 feature in this switch model. More over I've upgraded this switch with many ios but none of them not supporting IPv6 feature. ios which supports IPv6 feature?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have the cisco 3640 with IOS Version 12.2(46) , and it with DRAM:32M , Flash:8M.What IOS version can support IPv6 RIP in the hardware limit?
View 3 Replies View RelatedDoes the Model "WS-C2960-24PC-L" Supports IP Routing or not?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI need to know if Cisco Switch 2960 support Netflow. If it doesn't, how do I configure the switch to enable Netflow?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have CISCO RPS 600 (PWR-AC-RPS) is it support Catalyst 2960 and 3560 ? and which type of cable require since i have cable 22-18 pin and on my switch require 22-14 pin.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a customer with Cisco 7940 and 7960 IP phones that they do not plan to replace. They do want a new LAN and are looking at the Catalyst WS-C2960S-48FPD-L and WS-C2960S-24PD-L as access layer devices.
these switches support the Cisco pre-standard PoE required by the 7940 and 7960 IP phones.
We're going to be switching some of our gear from Foundry to Cisco, and were looking at the WS-C2960S-48TS-L. We currently have 3 different VLAN's, and I wanted to have 1 uplink back to our firewall (ASA 5550) and then let the firewall do the routing between the subnets. I realize that 1 link will carry the traffic twice then, but is that possibly with those switches to have all three vlans assigned to one port and then just let the firewall do the routing between the vlans or would I need to have 3 uplink ports back to the 5550?
View 1 Replies View RelatedDoes 2960-24PC-L can support codec G711 and G729.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have some 2960 switches with Lan Lite ios in my infrastructure.And I try to configure them to support "trust device cisco-phone" and "switchport priority extend cos 0" on ports with cisco phones.But LAN Lite image does not support "mls qos trust device cisco-phone".can I use any workaround to trust cos of cisco phone and to remark PC traffic with cos 0?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am having issues working on my QOS between 4510 and 3550 switch connecting on layer 3 through a service provider. I have class maps and policy map setup on both sides and then policy map attached to interfaces however i dont see any traffic matching in policy map on 3550 switch, i do see some traffic matching on 4510 but the speed with which its increasing has my doubts about it. When i make voip calls ( VOIP switches are sitting behind 3550 and are mainly 3550 pwr 24 port switches with phone ports configured for auto qos voip cisco-phone and trusting cos) i rarely see the RTP matching in class under policy map.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am currently running 12.2 (53) and am looking to move up to the 15+ train. Are there any pre-reqs prior to the upgrade that any one is aware of?Unfortunately I have no "lab environment" to test it in. I have production switches with minimal impact to the campus and if done late night I could have it restored back before open of business the following morning. My FW is up to the latest version and I have found nothing in the release notes specifically stating that there would require any stepped upgrades up to v15 and higher.
View 6 Replies View RelatedWe have an issue where switches are failing weekly in a switch closet. In the past month we have gone through several 3750G switches and a couple 4510s. The power supplies have eventually made a popping noise and had to be replaced. on the 4510s we've tried two chassis and gone through several power supplies.The switches have been behind UPS systems so should be receiving conditioned power.Could load from the PoE devices really be causing this? I wouldn't think it's power since they are behind a UPS.
View 5 Replies View RelatedThis has been happening repeatedly time to time! we just replace the part! But now it has come to trouble us again.It happening only in one module like 6 to 10 ports wont work.
we run IOS cat4500e-universalk9.SPA.03.02.00.SG.150-2.SG.bin will there be any bug in it?
I have two servers on one subnet that each need to replicate to a single server on another subnet. They also need to replicate to each other. This replication is unidirectional so I will refer to the 2 server subnet as the source subnet and the single server subnet as the destination subnet. In order to keep this replication running without killing the MPLS links on either end, we are trying to use a policy-map that limits bandwidth from the source subnet.The Problem:We have created a policy that polices traffic during specific times of day and limits the bandwidth as prescribed, however, bandwidth is also being limited between the 2 servers on the source subnet which is not needed or desired.Class 512K set dscp ef police 1024000 bps 1024000 byte conform-action transmit exceed-action dropClass Map match-any 512K (id 4) Match access-group name DAGExtended IP access list DAG 10 permit ip host 10.20.0.3 host 10.20.0.10 time-range DAG-REP (active) (22793 matches) 20 permit ip host 10.20.0.4 host 10.20.0.10 time-range DAG-REP (active) (14156 matches)The service policy is applied on the input side of the 2 interfaces on which our devices are connected.As you can see, the access list identifies the interesting traffic as traffic from two specific hosts to one specific host. The problem we are having is that bandwidth is also being throttled between the two source hosts even though it is not defined to do so.What can I do to limit traffic from the two source devices to the single destination device without limiting bandwidth between the two source devices?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have multiple switches(Cisco 4510, 4507R, 3560's) within our network. I've been looking over the port settings between them and noticed that not all ports that are connected directly from switch to switch are trunked the same. Some are desirable on one switch and forced truck on the other switch.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am using Cisco 4510 Switch with Default LAN Base image. Now I have purchased 10G Upgrade license. The part number for Upgrade license is WS-C4500-10G-LIC. I have received a CD from Cisco (named as 'Includes License and Warranty'). Any License upgradation is required for this license? Or this is only a paper License.
I could not find out any .lic file on the CD. Also there is no paper with PAK.
I just upgraded all of our switches on campus to Version 15.0(2)SG4 after about a month of testing. On two switches so far, we are seeing that clients can not connect, and the switch isnt detecting a link. I dont see anything out of the ordinary in int status, port-security, or errors on the interface. Plugging in a different computer does nothing. Only thing that works, is a shut, no shut of the interface. After that, its connected.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have a Catalyst 4510 that is running IOS version 15.X that has a bug and Cisco recommends upgrading the IOS. Are there additional steps required to perform an IOS upgrade due to licencing Cisco put in place?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am planning to enable MAC address filtering (one port on 4510 & another 3560). I want to allow only that MAC address to communicate via that port with the rest of the network and internet.
4510 has PC connected and 3560 had polycom connected. [code]
I got a 6509 version 12.1(22)E2 that I am replacing with a 4510E version 3.40SG with Supervisor Engine 7-E. The 6509 is configured with 20 channel-group for dual fiver connection to ten 3550 switches with trunking enabled with isl encapsulation. The 6509 is the VTP server to each of the 3550 switch clients. There are 40 Microsoft Servers attached ot the Gig RJ45 port modules.
I have attached the 4510 to the 6509 with dual fiber connection configured as a channel group with trunking enabled. I am configuring the 4510 the same as the 6509 except I have to use trunking with dot1q encapsulation because isl is not supported on the 4510. I no longer want to use VTP with the 4510 and have set the it as transparent mode. Each of the 3550 switches are changed from isl trunking encapsulation to dot1q and VTP mode is changed to transparent when they are moved from the 6509 to the 4510.
I want to move the switches over a few at a time and not all at once. The first 4 switches attached with no problems and ran with no problems for the user access to the servers still on the 6509 for a week. Then I found out DHCP was not working for the devices attached to the switches on the 4510. I moved one of our domain controllers form the 6509 to the 4510 to fix the DHVP problem. I have now added 2 more switches with users that use an application on a server still on the 6509 and they are getting disconnect errors after logging into it and using it. Other applications on different server also on the 6509 are having no problems. I moved the switches back to the 6509 to get the users up during business hours. I now plan on moving the server for the application that was failing to the 4510 in hopes that it will fix the problem.
Is there something I can do to speed up the connection between the 6509 and the 4510 so I can continue this transition without having to move the servers to the 4510 as I move the users?
I need to convert configuration from CatOS on 4006 to IOS on 4510. I am unable to find the conversion tool.
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe are facing issue related to STP.I am getting MAC FLAP error on Cisco 4510 switch. The effect on network is intermittent Pkt drops in the network. When I checked the specific Ip address I am getting the same with two different. [code] Vlan is created on CORE switch and assign priority 0 than CORE switch should be the Root. but instead Root port is becoming the port where server is connected. Server at last connected to CORE switch via HP switch via other Vlan to CORE switch and creating a loop as shown in Diag. [code] The Priority of Vlan 102 is changed and Root port has been changed due to that. The Bridge ID is the same as CORE switch.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI just upgrade a license on a cat 4510. The license installed but the EULA was not accepted and it will not upgrade to the new feature set.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am looking to find a command or counter to tell me if a cisco switch port on a 4510 was ever up and passed traffic. I want to shutdown all unused switchports on our access switches. But before I do that I need to make sure device is just not off or the person is away on vacation. If I do sh int interface, is there a counter I can reference.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have configured Span port on our 4510. We have an application 5view server to monitor trafic connected to G9/17 Since we have changed the network connection from physical Giga port and add a Port-channel instead, we don't see any more trafic from the new Port-channel to G9/17
We have the configuration below on our 4510 :
monitor session 1 source interface Gi4/6
monitor session 1 source interface Po20
monitor session 1 filter vlan 311 - 312 , 375
monitor session 1 destination interface Gi9/17
From the commands show, we don't see the trafic duplication from the source to the destination port :
Port Source
4510-5567#sh int po20
Port-channel20 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is EtherChannel, address is 0016.9de2.a818 (bia 0016.9de2.a818)
[Code].....
We are getting below errors on our Cisco 4500 Switche PS after Power Down activity.
Switch1
------------------ show power detail ------------------
Power Fan Inline
Supply Model No Type Status Sensor Status
------ ---------------- --------- ----------- ------- -------
PS1 PWR-C45-4200ACV AC 4200W good good good
PS1-1 off
PS1-2 220V good
PS2 PWR-C45-4200ACV AC 4200W err-disable good good
PS2-1 220V good
PS2-2 220V good
*** Power Supplies of different type have been detected***
00:01:02: %C4K_CHASSIS-3-MIXINPOWERDETECTED: Power supplies in the chassis are of different types (AC/DC) or wattage(code)
I'm having some trouble with a 4510 Switch Line Card. I need some recomendations for troubleshooting it.We have some PoE phones connected to the card number 3. When those phones were restarted, they did not go up again. In order to discard wiring issues, we connected the phone directly to the card 3, and the phone did not go up. If the phone is connected to a different card, it goes up correctly.
Additionally, to restore the service, these phones were migrated to other cards, but when we disconnect the equipment, ports in line card 3 remain in an up / up state (and nothing is connected to those ports!!), and only reflect the actual state after restarting the port.What steps could I do in order to troubleshoot this issue?. What should I look for, or how do I discriminate the problem? Might it be a hardware issue, a PoE issue?
I've got a Cisco 4510 which shows a system uptime in excess of 56 years. [code]
View 11 Replies View RelatedAre you only able to have two sessions for port mirroring on a Cisco 4510?
View 1 Replies View Related