I am trying to limit traffic inbound to 10Mbps on a gig interface 0/48 set to 100/full. So I downloaded some big files over this link and I'm able to see 30- 40Mbps or more. You can see from the show int - rate-limit command that parameters are never showing exceented so nothing has been dropped. [code]
View 3 Repliesi have to restrict that router and switches shall join only given multicasts. Means if i change multicast in TVG430 from 239.0.96.1 to 233.0.96.1 than it shall be blocked.My TX rate i set to 20 Mbits on TVG430, i want to rate-limit it to 15 Mbits on switch on Ingress int gi 0/23 or egress gi 0/24 included are three show runs output.ip multicast rate-limit out group-list GROUP source-list SOURCE.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a guest wireless setup but I need to rate limit the users so no one hogs all the bandwidth. The WLC is connected into a 3750 which is doing all the routing between the vlans. I know I cannot shape the traffic on the 3750.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a 2960 that I need to limit the uplink port to 50Mbps for 3 vlans and 350Mbps for another vlan. Would the following config achieve that or is this even possible for the 2960?
class-map match-any VLAN50-51-52
match vlan 50-52
class-map match-any VLAN53
[Code].....
I'm trying to limit the bandwidth on certain ports to 3Mbps and others 1Mbps for a project, however when I do a bandwidth test from a website the speed on the router doesn't seem to change it's as if the changes over telnet aren't actually affecting the swtich's qos settings. I have verified that the policy is attached to the interface and the settings are correct as well.
Router
Telnet address: 10.xxx.xx.xx
Password:
[Code].....
We have a number of 6509s which generally have dhcp relay agents configured on the SVIs. The dhcp servers are centralised. Recently we've had one or two faults with misconfigured or faulty devices (blade server chassis and also printers) generating high volumes of dhcp discover packets and causing high cpu on the relevant 6500. I would like to rate limit these discover packets, which are layer 2 broadcasts. Storm control can't discriminate between different types of broadcasts and on a gig link would need to be set down at about 1% to have much effect on the problem. I've looked at CoPP and also mls hardware rate-limiting but as I understand it, these two features don't control broadcast traffic. I also looked at dhcp snooping but if an interface receives a high level of dhcp discover broadcasts, e.g. over 100pps, I don't want it to go error-disabled (as this would knock down the whole edge switch), just to drop the excess packets.
View 2 Replies View Relatedhow to perform UBRL User Based Rate Limiting on ASR1000 like we can do it on Catalyst6500?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a 3560 switch where I have 4 ports connected, one is to our WAN provider - 10Mbps and the other three are connected to different customers who I want to get an equal share of the 10Mbps bandwidth.I'm fairly clued up about configuring modular QoS but I'm being thrown by the fact that you can't apply a service-policy outbound on the ethernet ports.
View 3 Replies View RelatedHow to rate limit a 3560 inbound and outbound using different QoS methods. I've read about vlan class maps/policy maps, using the rate limit command on the physical interface, using the srr-queue bandwidth command(it's a gig switch so not sure that would work) and marking all packets and then applying QoS. I'm just learning QoS so trying to figure all of this out and find the best way to do things.
Also, I was told to do this because it's not advisable to have a connection to your ISP that is not 10mb or 100mb on a switch, since they are not divisible by 10 and it can cause issues?
I am using Cisco 3560 as distrubution switch and want to limit port 445 traffic on 1 MB and applied rate limit statment on Gi0/1 port but switch unable to limit said traffic.rate-limit output access-group 120 1024000 128000 128000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop.
View 25 Replies View RelatedI am configuring a 3560 to provide internet access for our customers and I need to make sure they don't use more bandwidth than they have contracted for.I see that the 3560 supports the rate-limit command, but was told that I should use traffic shaping and policing along with access lists to manage the bandwidth.Is there a reason that I should avoid using the rate-limit command - it looks much simpler.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI 3750 doesn't support "shape" command under policy map. How do I limit the bandwidth to 3 M? [code]
View 3 Replies View RelatedI want to limit the bandwidth going to remote site on the switch connecting to our netapp.We have a 4 port channel group setup on our 3750x switch going to our netapp storage. We have a Wan 100mb link to our remote site and we want only 60MBs of that link to be used for Netapp traffic all other local traffic needs to use the full amount of the bandwidth to the netapp.
Is possible to allocate bandwidth in this way and how would I go about this? We dont have access to the routers for the link and they plug directly into a port on our cisco.
it seems that i made a mistake when typing the BAUD rate of a 2960-Switch in rommon.I can't start the switch now, because there is no image on it (because I deleted it before) and the baud-rate has wrong settings. When connecting via console cable i can't see anything (except some strange hieroglyphics) when starting. I tried all the speeds in teraterm... without success.what can i do, to recover the switch back?
View 8 Replies View RelatedAs always, the Cisco LMS is keep sending the follwoing high discard error from the Cisco switches WS-C2950T-24:
EVENT ID = 0004SX3
ALERT ID = 00019LF
TIME = Tue 14-Feb-2012 08:56:35 GMT
[Code].....
I have a 3825 with a 16 port etherswitch card installed that I'm trying to setup rate-limits on. Interface G0/0 is the connection to the outside world and int g0/1 has a couple of 2950 switches attached to it.
The etherswitch card, f1/0, f1,1 etc has corresponding vlans, 902, 903 etc each with an IP 10.110.1.x, 10.110.2.x and all part of access-group 111. The switches connect on sub-interfaces g0/1.101, g0/1.102 etc and have IP's 10.55.1.x, 10.55.2.x and part of access-group 101.
What i'm trying to achieve is that every port / IP that is on access-group 111 shares 3Mb of bandwidth in/out and access-group 101 shares a separate 3Mb of bandwidth in/out.
I've created two access-lists as follows;
access-list 101 permit ip 10.55.0.0 0.0.255.255 any
access-list 111 permit ip 10.110.0.0 0.0.255.255 any
And on int g0/0 I've created the following rate-limits;
rate-limit input access-group 101 3072000 64000 64000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
rate-limit input access-group 111 3072000 64000 64000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
rate-limit output access-group 101 3072000 64000 64000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
rate-limit output access-group 111 3072000 64000 64000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
Now instead of both access-groups having 3Mb each they all seem to be sharing 3Mb! I've tried class-maps and policy-maps but to no avail..
I have a router 3845 connected to a LAN and other routers and providing internet through a link on an ethernet interface
Gi0/0
LAN connection
GI0/1
WAN connection
fa0/0
Internet connection
I am looking for information on how to properly configure rate limits on a Cisco 2821 so that I can set different Service levels by IP address. For example I want to limit a block of IPs to 1 Mbps Down and 512 kbps Up. I am doing point to point networks from our router (ISR 2821) to another router that is assigned a static IP. The other router connects to our router through a Fast Ethernet port on a NM 16 port switch card. The routing end point for the network is on a VLAN interface. Currently we are using bonded T1's but are about to turn up a Metro-E circuit.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe bought a 3560 PoE switch to replace tons of PoE-injectors but when connecting the devices our logs were flooded with
Mar 11 15:09:20.725: %ILPOWER-7-DETECT: Interface Fa0/7: Power Device detected: IEEE PD
Mar 11 15:09:20.725: %ILPOWER-5-INVALID_IEEE_CLASS: Interface Fa0/7: has detected invalid IEEE class: 7 device. Power denied
Mar 11 15:09:20.968: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/8, changed state to down
Mar 11 15:09:20.985: %ILPOWER-7-DETECT: Interface Fa0/7: Power Device detected: IEEE PD
Mar 11 15:09:20.985: %ILPOWER-5-INVALID_IEEE_CLASS: Interface Fa0/7: has detected invalid IEEE class: 7 device. Power denied
While the message seems quite clear im wondering if there's any workaround on the problem?
I have used the following basic configuration to do rate limiting on a vlan interface on a 6509:
access-list 100 permit ip any any
class-map match-all ratelimit
match access-group 100
policy-map ratelimit-10Mb
class ratelimit
police 10000000 428750 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
[code]....
How do I combine the two correctly to give me a vlan port rate limited at 10Mb up and down, but still setting aside (dynamically) 2Mb for voice?
We are using mac authentication, it is working fine on all of the other 3560's except this new one.
Mac address shows up completely different (very long hex, doesnt even look like a mac address) on ACS compared to what its showing on the switch in the mac address table.
Im stumped, config matches every other 3560 in the building, has something changed in the v2 software compared to the older 3560's ?
I have issue with 3560 switch QoS configuration . I checked in cisco site about mentioned model QoS configuration.once we mark the frame and map the CoS to DSCP and once it enters into switch and it processes according to LAN QoS configured on interface
we have configured both the commands shape and share.
once it leaves the switch and enters into Edge router and if we do not have configured QoS in router which is normally MQC , how does it process each packet ?Do we need to have end to end QoS configured in LAN ?
The last few days I've been exploring options in getting rid of some old routers accross a wan connections. I have a cat 3560 to play with and I thought I would try and use the no switchport command test out routing with switch. I've got some type of route issue and I tried a few things which I thought would fix the issue but had no effect. I'll post the config and a few commands so you can see what the basic setup is.
Here we can see in the arp that it knows about both 10.7.1.2 (PC unable to ping 10.3.3.254) as well as 10.3.3.254 (ASA).I tried adding in a ip route of 10.7.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.3.3.110 as well as 10.3.3.254. Neither produced the results I wanted allowing 10.7.1.2 (PC) to ping the ASA (10.3.3.254). [code]
I have an environment of 3 X 3560G of which I have 1st switch-CORE(f0/10) connecting to the VPN router(CE) interface-f0/0. Remaining 2 Cisco 3560's(Access) are connected to Gi0/1 and Gi0/2 on the 1st switch-CORE via gi0/1 . On all three switches I have created multiple VLANs and assigned ports to these VLAN. The switch to switch connection is trunk allowing all VLANs created on all these 3 switches. Now the issue is how I am going to have all these VLANs routed through single interface on the routeri-e f0/0, as all these subnets will communicating to remote site over VPN. What should be default gateway on the 2 Access switches and the CORE switch, also what static route should be on router to reach all subnets(VLANs) created on these 3 switches.
I have read inter-VLAN routing i-e creating sub interfaces on router but dont want to proceed with that and looking for any other way to have my VLANs talk on all three switches and then are accessible to remote site ove VPN?
I am trying to get my workstation to talk to a workstation on a different sub-net through a Cisco 3560 switch. The switch is running the following IOS version: [code]
My primary network is 172.16.0.0 and I am trying to connect to a device on a 192.168.111.0 sub-net. [code]
What would be the best way to get the two workstations talking via the switch?
I am trying to configure a 3560 (Version 12.2(55)SE3) with IPServices to run WCCP to two to an Ironport WSA.
I believe everything is setup correctly, however WCCP is still not operational. I have check the debug logs on the switch and I'm presented with a number of messages along the lines of...
*Mar 1 03:44:47.891: WCCP-EVNT:wccp_update_assignment_status: enter
*Mar 1 03:44:47.891: WCCP-EVNT:wccp_update_assignment_status: exit
*Mar 1 03:44:47.891: WCCP-EVNT:wccp_copy_wc_assignment_data: enter
[Code]....
how to take the event log of Cisco switch 3560, its argent.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 3560-48 switch running Cisco IOS Software, C3560 Software (C3560-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(44)SE3 and i need to implement basic QOS commands to the fast Ethernet interfaces as well as the gig interfaces and Also I need to create port channels on the switch and need what the port channel syntax are as well for that particular IOS version?
I have only read only access and i can't see what the QOS and Port channels syntax should be for that IOS version.
I'm in the process of configuring QOS on a 3560 routing switch in a GOLD, SILVER, BRONZE priority type scenario.
Firstly, I understand that this config will add a tag of "precedence 5" to a packet if it matches the "ACL_QOS_GOLD_In" access list. Question is does the router see this "precedence 5" tag and then sets the priority, or am I missing something in my config where at present it just sees the "precedence 5" and doesn’t act on it ?
Secondly, Since the "precedence 5" tag has already been added to the packets, do downstream routers see this tag and act accordingly or so I need to configure those is well ? [code]
configure QoS on 3560 switch i have taken the template from cisco configuration guide since we have different QoS configuration on each model.
below is the configuration :
configure terminal
mls qos
end
mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 26 32 46 48 56
no mls qos srr-queue input cos-map mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 1 threshold 2 1 mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 1 threshold 3 0
[code]....
Currently all the cisco phones are connected to this switch and configuration with only one vlan that is voice vlan .
1) what is the outcome of this configuration , i mean, what will be the expected output ? end of the day we need to prioritize the voice traffic but why other commands including threshold and buffers are mentioned with respectives queues , if I need to explain that what am i expecting out of this configuration ?
2) this is LAN QoS which i understood but again , do i need to configure policy-map along with class-map which is MQC on this switch ?
3) i have edge router where i have MQC already configured but confusion with this switch which is working as a Access switch .
4) I referred the cisco QoS document for the respetive model whereas we have policy-map configured on the same switch with class-map .
My understanding is if we have configured the LAN QoS , and mapped the CoS value with DSCP , we need not to have MQC.
I am configuring some quotes for a customer whom I will be building a wireless network for. The wireless network will support about 60 AP's, as well as some other wired drops. The customer is working with a wireless vendor for the AP's, but I will be able to sell the switches for the network.
I want to ensure that he is pushing Gig and POE on each copper port for the AP's, since they will be "N" capable. I have selected several 3560 models which are in 24 port models, and I also think i have a requirement which mandates a 48 port in another location. What I have not been able to find in the Enterprise switch line is an 8 port which supports IOS and POE.
That being said, and since I am also "Select" certified, I went out to the SMB site, and did find that there were two models in the Small Business 300 line (models SG300-10P and SG300-10MP) which seem to support Gig ports as well as POE. I looked over the specs for each one of the two respective models, and I was not able to find what the difference between each of these two are. In other words, the specs, line by line, were identical.
we have a class based qos scheme (see attached file) on our 4500 series access switches and we have a access 3560-48 switch runing IOS Version 12.2(44)SE3 my question is can I use the same QOS scheme for the 3560 switch?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have two Cisco switches with one 3560 and one 3750 we have created a new Vlan 4 with IP 10.1.3.x 255.255.255.0 - no shut then assigne to gi 2/0/46 on the 3560 Vlan 4 ip address 10.1.3.x 255.255.255.0 no shut then assign to FA0/45. All interfaces are up up along with the Vlan up up, we can ping the local IP address bu not able to pint the other switch.
View 2 Replies View Related