Cisco VPN :: 877 - IPSec Traffic Is Only Initiated From One End
Apr 27, 2013
I have configured the IPsec vpn between Cisco 877 and ISA server which is working fine and ok. But the issue is I have multiple subnet on the TMG "Treat Managmenet Gateway" side and only one subnet on the Cisco 877 side. I can only sending some subnet's traffics from Cisco 877 through the vpn tunnel to the other side which is TMG server and I have recieved teh timeout request for the rest of teh subnets.
However, if I initiated the ping from inside the ISA with different sources , I can reached the Cisco 877 and from then I can be able to send traffic.
So, the tunnel is up and active but it should be initated from ISA server to have a full connectivity.
Here is the IP sec configuration on Cisco side:
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 7, 2012
I have a Cisco ACE 4710 A5(1.2). Scenario: Inbound call from PSTN to SIP Phone. Call comes into the VIP and then load balances to sip server, the server then routes the call out via WAN to the SIP phone as below:
PSTN SIP Providor >(router)> ACE4710 > sip_server(s) > ACE4710 > (router) >SIP Phone
Note: Router is Cisco 3925 with "ip nat service sip udp port 5060" and Port 5060 mapped to the VIP of the ACE.If I put the sip server directly behind the router it works fine. From behind the ACE:
If I turn on sip inspect on the VIP the call setup (INVITE) and termination (BYE) work fine but the audio loops on the PSTN side from the mic to the speaker.If I turn OFF sip inspect then the audio is fine and mapped correctly but the call terminaton (SIP BYE) hits the VIP from the PSTN but never reaches the sip server.For ease and dianostics, I have turned off all sip servers except one meaning the load-balancer has only one server to choose from.SIP Call_id sticky is setup and seems to work, though irrelevent with one server only on test.How do I get the ACE to accept 'server initiated traffic' with sip inspect so it knows about the pending BYE when it comes back from the IP phone via the VIP?Config below, image attached. Bridged mode (also get the same result in routed mode)
access-list everyone line 8 extended permit ip any anyaccess-list everyone line 16 extended permit icmp any any
probe sip udp 1 description SIP Health Monitor interval 30 expect status 200 200
rserver host server1 description Production SIP Server ip address 10.44.56.172 conn-limit max 980 min 980 probe 1 inservice
serverfarm host sip failaction purge probe 1 rserver server1 inservice
[code].....
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 25, 2011
I have setup an ASA 5505 w/ Security Plus with three subnets. The subnets are as follows:
VLANSubnetWAN 10.0.0.80/29LAN192.168.1.0/24DMZ172.30.200.0/24 ]
The ASA is the gateway router at .1 for the LAN and DMZ networks. On the WAN network, the ASA occupies .85 and uses .86 as it's gateway to the Internet. Clients on the LAN are able to access the Internet without any troubles. I have a static NAT setup to map the DMZ server's 172.30.200.81 address to 10.0.0.81. I also have a general NAT that should allow other servers on that network to access the internet, but no machine at all on that network can route outside of 172.30.200.0/24. I used the packet tracer and had it trace traffic coming from the DMZ network to the Internet, and it did not show me any conflicts with any of the access lists or anything else. However, no matter what I do, I cannot initiate traffic from the DMZ and have it go out to the Internet successfully.I attempted to follow the directions in the article PIX/ASA 7.x and above: Mail (SMTP) Server Access on the DMZ Configuration Example; but I have obviously missed something, done something wrong, or perhaps the example assumes something about my configuration that I have not done. See the attached config file that I have scrubbed. I have removed VPN configuration information and other unnecessary parts of the config file to make it easier to read. I have setup an ASA 5505 w/ Security Plus with three subnets. The subnets are as follows: VLANSubnetWAN 10.0.0.80/29LAN192.168.1.0/24DMZ172.30.200.0/24 ]
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 24, 2011
I am working with an ASA5505. I have configured a Remote Access IPsec Connection profile. This profile is configured to give clients a virtual ip address via DHCP as shown in this configuration example: url...When the DHCP request is sent from the ASA to the DHCP server, the hostname in the request is set to the name of the IPsec connection profile and a number. Is it possible to have the hostname set to the host name of the client that initiated the connection?Does the ASA support receiving a hostname as part of a IKE Mode Config Request?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 12, 2010
I am trying to configure L2TP Client-Initiate Tunneling on a cisco 1941 with C1900 Software (C1900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1(2)T0a, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1).
I have two 1941 and trying to tunnel the VLAN's across a point to point T1 connection. The reason for this is because one of the vlans on the remote end needs to be in a DMZ. The problem that I am having is that is allows me to setup the l2tp class but the pseudowire-class command is not available. Is there somthing I am missing? According to Feature Navigator L2TP Client-Initiate Tunneling is available in the IOS I am using
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2011
why my VPN setup is not working correctly. The device is an ASA 5505 running IOS version 8.2. It has a license for 2 SSL VPNS, and 25 IPSec VPNs. The previous Admin had set up both but only the SSL VPN apparently works. I attempted to set up my own IPSec VPN using the ASDM wizard, with an IP range of 192.168.40.10-50. I am connecting from a Mac, 10.6. My local network (home) is a standard 192.168.1.0/24; the remote networks are 192.168.2.0 and 192.168.3.0. I tried connecting using the built-in Snow Leopard client, and although it said I was connected I couldn't actually contact anything on the corporate LAN.\
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2011
We have a business need that we have to set up a IPsec L2L tunnel (from multiple locations) to a business partner, we require that the connection can only be initiated from our side, not business partner side. I searched the web, one option is configure our side ASA to initate IKE only, this does not seem to meet our requirement, because once IPsec SA is up, IP layer traffic will flow freely in either direction; the other option people suggested is to use VPN filter in tunnel group policy, but the documention of how to use this vpn-filter to enforce one way traffic policy is not crystal clear to me; I actually configured reflexive ACL on core L3 switch before the traffic hits ASA to reflect/evalulate specific traffic to businness partner's LAN network, that worked well. However one of our branch office's core L3 switch is Cat4K which does not support reflexive ACL with the image it is currently running, so I am stuck again .
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 26, 2011
I have C1841 as EZVPN server and remote C1841 as EZVPN client. Connection between them is providers L3 VPN, so it is not over the internet. IPSec tunnels go up with no problem. Client is NEM. Problem is that traffic won't go via IPSec. No packets are encapsulated. I want all trafiic to go via tunnel, no split tunneling here. On client side Dialer0 is outside interface, since L3 VPN is over ADSL. On server's side I have only one interface connected to corporate network. Peer address is server's loopback address.
After IPSec is up, server gets remote subnets as static routes and redistribute them to OSPF. That part works fine, but remote site's traffic doesn't flow over IPSec to the coorporate LAN.
Could be TCP MSS or something like that?
Configuration:
EZVPN SERVER:
!
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr aes 256
authentication pre-share
group 2
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 8, 2012
i am curently troubleshooting a ipsec l2l VPN between
1. ASA 7.2(4) to SSG-140
2. Cisco 871W to SSG-140
In both scenario's the tunnel is nicely established, and traffic goes into the tunnel, but nothing comes out. All encap's, but no decap's
It seems like a routing issue, but we can not find anything on both sites.
So maybe i m running into a (known) issue between cisco VPN equipment and the SSG-140?
Could it be a proxy-id issue? Cause they configure stuff like 10.1.1.0/24 and i configure 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 29, 2011
I need to route traffic to DMZ (and internal) from the branch office thru the IPSec tunnel. How do I manage that with my Cisco 881?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 2012
I am trying to pass Traffic thru the IPSEC tunnel but it does not work ([Cisco Router 892] <---> [Cisco ASA 5510] <---> [Cisco Router 892]) The Cisco ASA 5510 doesn't pass traffic UDP=500 & UDP=4500 ports...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2011
I have a Site to Site IPSEC VPN Tunnel created with ASDM wizard.
Cisco ASA-5505
Peer A: x.x.x.x
Lan A: 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0
Fortinet FortiGate-50b
Peer B: y.y.y.y
Lan B: 192.168.23.0 255.255.255.0
I start traffic from LAN B with a ping (or telnet it doesn't matter) that receive no reply but tunnel goes up fine.
"show isakmp sa" seems ok (says "State : MM_ACTIVE")
"show ipsec sa" seems ok but all #pkts are zero
try ftp, telnet from LAN B to LAN A systems but no one work. "show ipsec sa" all #pkts are zero As soon as I generate traffic from LAN A to LAN B these works (with tunnel already up) also traffic from LAN B to LAN A works.Obviously if I end VPN and start tunnel making traffic from LAN A all work fine bidirectionally, LAN A reach LAN B and LAN B reach LAN A.No msg logged in either two appliance.
Seems a very strange problem because seems not related to Phase1 or Phase2 already established.Traffic (routing ?) start works only after at least one packet goes from LAN A to LAN B.No msg logged in either two appliance.Problems begun in ASA version 8.0(4) ASDM version 6.1(3) and remain/continue after upgrade to ASA Version 8.4(1) ASDM version 6.4(1).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2012
We have 7 remote offices and 10 tower locations that utilize IPsec tunnels back to our HQ. We now want to force all traffic including web surfing through the tunnels. What would be the easiest way to acomplish this? I have tried utilizing the crypto map policy to do this, but was unable to acomplish this.
Each of our office locationss utilize a Cisco 2811 router and the tower locations utilize a Cisco 881.
View 21 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2012
We are currently experiencing a problem on an IP SEC VPN tunnel that has all of us here completely stumped. We are hoping that one of you experts out there will be able to assist. Here are some basic details:
NETWORKS
An IPSEC site to site tunnel has been built between the two sites on different networks.
PIX 515E - MAIN SITE
Network 172.16.0.0/24
CISCO 1841 - REMOTE SITE
Network 172.16.99.0/24
ISSUE
All traffic flows over the VPN from the 172.16.99.0 network in the direction of the Pix, such as RDP, SIP etc. Pings will go in both directions across the tunnel. Other than the pings most traffic will NOT flow over the tunnel from the 172.16.0.0 network on the pix to the 172.16.99.0 network on the 1841. It would appear that something on the 1841 is blocking traffic coming in over the tunnel from the 172.16.0.0 network as we can not get a wire shark capture on a PC on the 172.16.99.0 network, other than the ICMP traces. Usually this is an access list problem but we have checked and double checked the configuration and can't see anything.
TROUBLESHOOTING SO FAR
1. Have tried inserting various access list changes to the tunnel on the 1841 to make specific reference to the 172.16.0.0 network.
2. Have tried various NAT entries.
3. Have removed and then recreated the VPN tunnel from a fresh start.
4. Have made the MTU 1400 on the inside interfaces on the Pix and the 1841.
The tunnel is fully up at all times and as we say can ping in both directions.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2011
All of my remote sites use various routers to route all of their traffic via IPsec. However, I have one WRVS4400N w/firmware 2.0.2.1 configured with a working tunnel. My issue is I need to set the Remote Group to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 so all traffic is forced via IPsec tunnel and not out the local gateway. When I do the error, Remote Security Group and Local Security Group cannot be in the same network. However, it works with Cisco/Linksys RV042.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2011
We have multiple vpn tunnels coming to our cisco asa 5520 , the problem is that when we create another tunnel with the same network as another network on the firewall , it does not know how to route the traffic to which interface or sub interface.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2013
How can I see the quantity of traffic that is passing through into an IPSec VPN in a ASA 5520.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2011
I currently have two Cisco ASA 5505. They are at different physical sites (SITE A, SITE B) and are configured with a site-to-site VPN which is active and working.
I can communicate with the subnets on either site from the other and both are connected to the internet, however I need to ensure that all the traffic at my site B goes through this VPN to my site A.
I changed this access-list : access-list outside_2_cryptomap extended permit ip network_siteB network_siteA to access-list outside_2_cryptomap extended permit ip network_siteB any
But this does not work. If I do [URL], site B IP address is not same that site A.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2011
I am trying to set up a LAN-to-LAN VPN tunnel between two sites. One site has a 5505, and the other site has a 5510. It looks like the tunnel is being established fine (both ISAKMP and IPSEC SAs look OK), but traffic doesn't appear to be routing across the internet between the devices. [code]
View 15 Replies
View Related
Nov 22, 2012
Is there anyway to limit a user's traffic volume on ASA8.4? if there is, how?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2013
We have many VPN tunnels back to our corporate office. All of these tunnels are very slow (same with our client VPN's). Our main firewall device at the corporate office is an ASA5510. We have a 100 Mb/sec Metro Ethernet internet connection here. We do not allow split-tunneling.
Our remote sites vary. We have DSL connections, cable internet connections, and other types of broadband that vary in speeds from 5 to 100 Mb/sec (up and down). The remote sites mostly have PIX 501's, but we have an ASA 5505 in one of the locations.
To take an example. On one of our remote sites that has a 100 Mb/sec connection, if I ping device to device, I'm getting ping times of about 50ms. And I'm pinging back through another 100 Mb/sec connection. If I get on a computer down there and run a speed test, I'm showing down speeds of about 1.5 Mb/sec... nowhere near 100. Some of that could be due to the lack of split tunneling, but I also suspect this could be an MTU issue.
Right now, all my MTU's are just set to the default 1500. Perhaps this is too high. I used this site to check my max: [URL]
I did a few tests from behind several of my firewalls. I pinged from a machine on one side of the tunnel to the firewall on the other end. I'm assuming the max MTU I come up with is the max MTU for the firewall I'm behind while pinging, right? The max amounts I came up with for some of my devices were as follows: Corporate ASA 5510 > 1272 (if you add the 28 byte packet header that would make it 1300) Remote PIX 501 > 1416 (if you add the 28 byte packet header that would make it 1444) Remote ASA 5505 > 1418 (if you add the 28 byte packet header that would make it 1446)
So, do I just need to set my MTU values to the appropriate amounts? I have tried changing the value, but I don't see any change in speed/performance. But I also don't know if I need to reboot the firewalls after changing the MTU. I know with Catalyst switches, you have to reload. But I didn't see any messages about needing to reboot on the ASA's/PIX's.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2012
we have two 2851's. One in Australia, one in NZ, IPsec VPN between the two.
We have multiple subnets behind the tunnels. From all the sunbets in Aus we can reach all the subnets in NZ, except for one. From NZ we can reach all the subnets in Aus. The traceroute and pings from the subnet in question in Aus goes out the internet interface of the router instead of going into the tunnel.
The subnets in question are 10.110.220/24 (Aus), 10.110.250/24 (NZ)
The access lists at both ends cover the traffic required but for some reason when leaving Australia the traffic is not captured by:
Crypto Map "AUS-SYD" 20 ipsec-isakmp
Description: Auckland VPN
Peer = 203.167.249.46
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2013
I have an IPSec tunnel configured on my Cisco 1941. The other device is an ZyXEL router.I can see the tunnel is up but there is no traffic.This comes out the show crypto ipsec sa
interface: Dialer1
Crypto map tag: CMAP_AVW, local addr 10.10.10.89
protected vrf: (none)
local ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (192.168.200.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (192.168.150.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
current_peer 20.20.20.161 port 500
[code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2011
I've replaced real networkID to the one mentined below.
Topology: classical IPSec VPN tunnel between two Cisco 892s, with pre-shared key and no GRE. One 892 (branch_892) has access to the Internet via PPPoE and has three networks/vlans behind it. One VLAN is NATed to access internet via the PPPoE. Access to two other VLANs - VL92 (100.100.200.0/24) and VL93 (100.100.100.0/24) need is done thrue the VPN tunnel.
Second 892 (892_DC) has just one interface - WAN on Gigabit enabled/connected and has a static route to the default GW. It does not have any interal network defined. So the router is strictly used to send traffic for VL92/VL93 to the branch 892 via IPSec tunnel.
Here is the problem: access to/from VL93 (100.100.100.0/24) works, however for VL92 (100.100.100.0/24) - does not.
From devices in VL92 I can ping the 892_DC IP address across the VPN tunnel. From the 892_DC router I can also ping devices in VL92. However I can no ping from VL92 any device beyond the 892_DC and at the same time packet arriving on 892_DC for VL92 are not sent out via the VPN tunnel.
I took the packet trace on 892_DC using capture point/buffer to capute packets for VL92 and could see that traffic does arrive at the 892_DC. I run the same capute on Branch_892 and there was not a single packet.More interesting I modified the access list such a way that left on VL92 and still - no packets are sent out thru the tunnel. [code]
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2013
I have a ASA 5505, which has two IPSec RA tunnels build, for each one the user is able to authenticate and get an IP address is the designated IP pool, but they are not able to ping the Firewall, or RDP to any internal servers. Here is a copy of the running config:
: Saved
:
ASA Version 7.2(2)
!
hostname ciscoasa(code)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2013
I have an issue where I can get traffic to pass from HDQ to two branch offices over our ipsec/gre tunnels even though the tunnels appear to be UP. The HDQ is a 2811, branch is a home office using an 871W and branch runs a 2801 router. I initially had HDQ working fine with the 871W but when I configured branch2 (2801), they both broke. The tunnels appear to be up but traffic is not routing across them. The two 2801 routers run 12.4 (c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-24.T2.bin). These are gre over ipsec tunnels. Currently traffic flows over an exsting MPLS network that we are getting away from due to cost. As soon as I change the routes to point to the Tunnels, it breaks. Traffic doesn't appear to pass through the tunnel. I have attached my sanitized configs.
HDQ#sh crypto sessCrypto session current status
Interface: FastEthernet0/1Session status: UP-ACTIVEPeer: 205.205.205.21 port 500 IKE SA: local 204.204.204.66/500 remote 205.205.205.21/500 Active IPSEC FLOW: permit 47 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 Active SAs: 4, origin: crypto map IPSEC FLOW:
[Code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2011
I want a simple remote client-initiated VPN for employees to access corporate resources from home simultaneously with being able to access the internet. I am using CCP and seem to have several options including Easy VPN server, SSL VPN. I also can choose "Full Tunnel" or not.I have a 2911 router. I have a static range of internet IP addresses. The router is already functioning with inside to outside and outside to inside NAT, etc.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 6, 2012
We have problems on central firewall with restricting traffic coming from remote office from IPsec. (The network sheme is attached) All branch offices are connected to central asa though IPsec. The main aim is to rule access from branch offices only on the central firewall, NOT on each IPsec tunnel According to the sheme:172.16.1.0/24 is on of the branch office LANs10.1.1.0/24 and 10.2.2.0/24 are central office LANThe crypto ACL looks like permit ip 172.16.1.0/24 10.0.0.0/8 the aim is to restrict access from 172.16.1.0/24 to 10.1.1.0/24 When packets are generated from host 10.1.1.10 to 172.16.1.0/24 all is ok - they are dropped by acl2 When packets are generated from 172.16.1.0/24 to 10.1.1.10 they are not dropped by any ACL - the reason is stateful firewall - traffic bypasses all access lists on a back path I thought that TCP State Bypass feature can solve this problem and disable stateful firewall inspection for traffic coming from 172.16.1.0/24 to 10.1.1.0/24, but it didn't work.The central asa 5500 is configured according to cisco doc [URL]
access-list tcp_bypass_acl extended permit tcp 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
!
class-map tcp_bypass_map
description "TCP traffic that bypasses stateful firewall"
match access-list tcp_bypass_acl
[code].....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2013
Is it at all possible to channel all/some data traffic through an established ipsec tunneled connection using the RVL200? I have successfully established an ipsec connection through RVL200 and RV042 routers and are able to connect to servers/computers behind it.Now I want to channel all or some traffic through the ipsec-tunnel for computers that reside on 192.168.1.0 subnet of RVL200 network.
Main office - RV042 router - 10.200.62.1
Remote office - RVL200 router - 192.168.1.1
I am trying to use the Advanced Routing option to add static routes but I am not 100% sure if I am configuring the routes correctly.To give an example of routing DNS requests for HOTMAIL.COM [65.55.72.183]: [code]For some reason this does not appear to work. I have also tried using the interface setting of WAN and tested - this also does not work.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2012
i'm using an rv220W and i whant to know if is it possible to assign vpn traffic to a vlan when i setup an ipsec tunnel?
example:
Im using different vlans on my rv220W.
Vlan 10: engineers (ex: 192.168.1.0/27) no intervlan routing
Vlan20: sales (ex: 10.0.123.0/24) no intervlan routing
This is what i need: - An engineer is on the road and when he makes a ipsec vpn connection => assignd to the vlan "engineers" so he can access the server/pc's in that vlan.and when someone from the sales group starts a vpn connection he needs to be in the vlan "sales" so he can access his pc/data,...
View 15 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2012
This has to be the most weirdest issue I have seen since the past year on my ASA. I have an ASA 5540 running the 8.4(2) code without any issues until I stumbled upon this problem last week and I have spent sleepless nights with no resolution! So, take a deep breath and here is a brief description of my setup and the problem:
A Simple IPSEC tunnel between my ASA 5540 8.4(2) and a Juniper SSG 140 screen OS 6.3.0r9.0(route based VPN)
The tunnel comes up without any issues but the ASA refuses to encrypt the traffic but decrypts it with GLORY! below are some debug outputs, show outputs and a packet tracer output which also has an explanation of my WEIRD NAT issue:
My setup - ( I wont get into the tunnel encryption details as my tunnel negotiations are **** perfect and comes up right off the bat when the ASA is configured as answer only)
CISCO ASA - IPSec networking details
LOCAL NETWORK - 10.2.4.0/28
REMOTE NETWORK - 192.168.171.8/32
JUNIPER SSG 140 - IPSec networking details
PROXY ID: LOCAL NETWORK - 192.168.171.8/32
REMOTE NETWORK - 10.2.4.0/28
HOST NAME# sh cry ipsec sa peer <JUNIPER SSG PEER>
peer address: <JUNIPER SSG PEER>
[code]...
As you can see, there is no echo reply packet at all as the packet is not being encapsulated while it is being sent back. I have been going mad with this. Also, this is a live production multi tenant firewall with no issues at all apart from this ****** ip sec tunnel to a juniper!!
Also, the 192.168.10.0/24 is another IP Sec tunnel remote network to this 10.2.4.0/28 network and this IP SEC tunnel has a similar Juniper SSG 140 screen os 6.3.0r9.0 at the remote end and this woks like a charm without any issues, but the 171 is not being encrypted by the ASA at all.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2013
I tried any type of combination and just couldn't make it works. Only PPTP works well. Whether Apple iOS IPSec VPN is supported or not?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2010
We have cisoc 2821 at one of branch and created five sub inetrfaces for different vlans.Output of Show interface shows very frequent increase in the input error count.I have changed the physical cable and switch port on the other side.But still error rate is increasing.When the traffic is less error rate is low but with high traffic it is increasing drastically.My router process is very less(4%) only.What could be possible reason. [code]
View 8 Replies
View Related
