Cisco VPN :: Configure IPsec L2L To Allow Only One Way Traffic

May 9, 2011

We have a business need that we have to set up a IPsec L2L tunnel (from multiple locations) to a business partner, we require that the connection can only be initiated from our side, not business partner side. I searched the web, one option is configure our side ASA to initate IKE only, this does not seem to meet our requirement, because once IPsec SA is up, IP layer traffic will flow freely in either direction; the other option people suggested is to use VPN filter in tunnel group policy, but the documention of how to use this vpn-filter to enforce one way traffic policy is not crystal clear to me;  I actually configured reflexive ACL on core L3 switch before the traffic hits ASA to reflect/evalulate specific traffic to businness partner's LAN network, that worked well. However one of our branch office's core L3 switch is Cat4K which does not support reflexive ACL with the image it is currently running, so I am stuck again .

View 1 Replies


Cisco :: IPSec VPN Not Forwarding Traffic?

May 25, 2011

why my VPN setup is not working correctly. The device is an ASA 5505 running IOS version 8.2. It has a license for 2 SSL VPNS, and 25 IPSec VPNs. The previous Admin had set up both but only the SSL VPN apparently works. I attempted to set up my own IPSec VPN using the ASDM wizard, with an IP range of I am connecting from a Mac, 10.6. My local network (home) is a standard; the remote networks are and I tried connecting using the built-in Snow Leopard client, and although it said I was connected I couldn't actually contact anything on the corporate LAN.\

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 877 - IPSec Traffic Is Only Initiated From One End

Apr 27, 2013

I have configured the IPsec vpn between Cisco 877 and ISA server which is working fine and ok. But the issue is I have multiple subnet on the TMG "Treat Managmenet Gateway" side and only one subnet on the Cisco 877 side. I can only sending some subnet's traffics from Cisco 877 through the vpn tunnel to the other side which is TMG server and I have recieved teh timeout request for the rest of teh subnets.
However, if I initiated the ping from inside the ISA with different sources , I can reached the Cisco 877 and from then I can be able to send traffic.
So, the tunnel is up and active but it should be initated from ISA server to have a full connectivity. 
Here is the IP sec configuration on Cisco side:
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
authentication pre-share


View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: C1841 -Traffic Won't Go Via IPSec

Jul 26, 2011

I have C1841 as EZVPN server and remote C1841 as EZVPN client. Connection between them is providers L3 VPN, so it is not over the internet. IPSec tunnels go up with no problem. Client is NEM. Problem is that traffic won't go via IPSec. No packets are encapsulated. I want all trafiic to go via tunnel, no split tunneling here. On client side Dialer0 is outside interface, since L3 VPN is over ADSL. On server's side I have only one interface connected to corporate network. Peer address is server's loopback address.

After IPSec is up, server gets remote subnets as static routes and redistribute them to OSPF. That part works fine, but remote site's traffic doesn't flow over IPSec to the coorporate LAN.
Could be TCP MSS or something like that?
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr aes 256
authentication pre-share
group 2

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA Or 871 IPSec L2L To SSG-140 - Tunnel Is Up But No Traffic

Aug 8, 2012

i am curently troubleshooting a ipsec l2l VPN between
1. ASA 7.2(4) to SSG-140
2. Cisco 871W to SSG-140
In both scenario's the tunnel is nicely established, and traffic goes into the tunnel, but nothing comes out. All encap's, but no decap's                    
It seems like a routing issue, but we can not find anything on both sites.
So maybe i m running into a (known) issue between cisco VPN equipment and the SSG-140?
Could it be a proxy-id issue? Cause they configure stuff like and i configure

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 881 / Route Traffic Thru IPSec Tunnel To DMZ

Jun 29, 2011

I need to route traffic to DMZ (and internal) from the branch office thru the IPSec tunnel. How do I manage that with my Cisco 881?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 5510 IPSEC No Traffic Flow

Jan 18, 2012

I am trying to pass Traffic thru the IPSEC tunnel but it does not work  ([Cisco Router 892] <---> [Cisco ASA 5510] <---> [Cisco Router 892]) The Cisco ASA 5510 doesn't pass traffic  UDP=500 & UDP=4500 ports...

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5505 - IPSec VPN L2L Tunnel Up But No Traffic

Mar 19, 2011

I have a Site to Site IPSEC VPN Tunnel created with ASDM wizard.
Cisco ASA-5505
Peer A: x.x.x.x
Lan A:
 Fortinet FortiGate-50b
Peer B: y.y.y.y
Lan B:
I start traffic from LAN B with a ping (or telnet it doesn't matter) that receive no reply but tunnel goes up fine.
"show isakmp sa" seems ok (says "State   : MM_ACTIVE")
"show ipsec sa" seems ok but all #pkts are zero
try ftp, telnet from LAN B to LAN A systems but no one work. "show ipsec sa" all #pkts are zero As soon as I generate traffic from LAN A to LAN B these works (with tunnel already up) also traffic from LAN B to LAN A works.Obviously if I end VPN and start tunnel making traffic from LAN A all work fine bidirectionally, LAN A reach LAN B and LAN B reach LAN A.No msg logged in either two appliance.
Seems a very strange problem because seems not related to Phase1 or Phase2 already established.Traffic (routing ?) start works only after at least one packet goes from LAN A to LAN B.No msg logged in either two appliance.Problems begun in ASA version 8.0(4) ASDM version 6.1(3) and remain/continue after upgrade to ASA Version 8.4(1) ASDM version 6.4(1).

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 1841 - IPsec Tunnel Two Way Traffic

Oct 23, 2012

We are currently experiencing a problem on an IP SEC VPN tunnel that has all of us here completely stumped. We are hoping that one of you experts out there will be able to assist. Here are some basic details:
An IPSEC site to site tunnel has been built between the two sites on different networks.
All traffic flows over the VPN from the network in the direction of the Pix, such as RDP, SIP etc. Pings will go in both directions across the tunnel. Other than the pings most traffic will NOT flow over the tunnel from the network on the pix to the network on the 1841. It would appear that something on the 1841 is blocking traffic coming in over the tunnel from the network as we can not get a wire shark capture on a PC on the network, other than the ICMP traces. Usually this is an access list problem but we have checked and double checked the configuration and can't see anything.
1. Have tried inserting various access list changes to the tunnel on the 1841 to make specific reference to the network. 
2. Have tried various NAT entries. 
3. Have removed and then recreated the VPN tunnel from a fresh start. 
4. Have made the MTU 1400 on the inside interfaces on the Pix and the 1841.
The tunnel is fully up at all times and as we say can ping in both directions.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 877 - Configure L2L IPSec?

Feb 27, 2011

I would like to configure a vpn l2l ipsec for a friend. i have a router cisco 877 i configure it but vpn doesn't work.Above my configuration:

Current configuration : 5443 bytes!version 12.4no service padservice timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname Laboratorio!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!!aaa new-model!!aaa authentication login default localaaa authorization exec default local!aaa session-id common!resource policy!ip cefno ip dhcp use vrf connectedip dhcp excluded-address dhcp excluded-address dhcp excluded-address!ip dhcp pool HostPc   network   default-router   dns-server!ip dhcp pool MPLs   network   default-router   dns-server!!!!crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-4019649088enrollment selfsignedsubject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-4019649088revocation-check nonersakeypair TP-self-signed-4019649088!!crypto pki certificate


View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: WRVS4400N Won't Route All Traffic Over IPsec

Dec 15, 2011

All of my remote sites use various routers to route all of their traffic via IPsec.  However, I have one WRVS4400N w/firmware configured with a working tunnel.  My issue is I need to set the Remote Group to so all traffic is forced via IPsec tunnel and not out the local gateway.  When I do the error, Remote Security Group and Local Security Group cannot be in the same network. However, it works with Cisco/Linksys RV042.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5520 IPSec Overlap - How To Route Traffic

Nov 13, 2011

We have multiple vpn tunnels coming to our cisco asa 5520 , the problem is that when we create another tunnel with the same network as another network on the firewall , it does not know how to route the traffic to which interface or sub interface.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 5520 - How Much Traffic Pass Through Into IPSec In ASA Firewall

Mar 20, 2013

How can I see the quantity of traffic that is passing through into an IPSec VPN in a ASA 5520.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5505 - Forward All Traffic Over Ipsec Tunnel?

Jul 18, 2011

I currently have two Cisco ASA 5505.  They are at different  physical sites (SITE A, SITE B) and are configured with a site-to-site VPN which is  active and working.
I can communicate with the subnets on either site from the other and both are connected to the internet, however I need to ensure that all the traffic at my site B goes through this VPN to my site A.
I changed this access-list : access-list outside_2_cryptomap extended permit ip network_siteB network_siteA to access-list outside_2_cryptomap extended permit ip network_siteB any
But this does not work. If I do [URL], site B IP address  is not same that site A.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 5505 LAN-to-LAN IPsec VPN Tunnel Traffic Not Being Routed

Feb 24, 2011

I am trying to set up a LAN-to-LAN VPN tunnel between two sites.  One site has a 5505, and the other site has a 5510.  It looks like the tunnel is being established fine (both ISAKMP and IPSEC SAs look OK), but traffic doesn't appear to be routing across the internet between the devices. [code]

View 15 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 8.4 - Limit IPSec User Traffic Volume

Nov 22, 2012

Is there anyway to limit a user's traffic volume on ASA8.4? if there is, how?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 - Slow Traffic On IPSec Tunnels

May 2, 2013

We have many VPN tunnels back to our corporate office.  All of these tunnels are very slow (same with our client VPN's).  Our main firewall device at the corporate office is an ASA5510.  We have a 100 Mb/sec Metro Ethernet internet connection here.  We do not allow split-tunneling.

Our remote sites vary.  We have DSL connections, cable internet connections, and other types of broadband that vary in speeds from 5 to 100 Mb/sec (up and down).  The remote sites mostly have PIX 501's, but we have an ASA 5505 in one of the locations.

To take an example.  On one of our remote sites that has a 100 Mb/sec connection, if I ping device to device, I'm getting ping times of about 50ms.  And I'm pinging back through another 100 Mb/sec connection.  If I get on a computer down there and run a speed test, I'm showing down speeds of about 1.5 Mb/sec... nowhere near 100.  Some of that could be due to the lack of split tunneling, but I also suspect this could be an MTU issue. 

Right now, all my MTU's are just set to the default 1500.  Perhaps this is too high.  I used this site to check my max: [URL]
I did a few tests from behind several of my firewalls.  I pinged from a machine on one side of the tunnel to the firewall on the other end.  I'm assuming the max MTU I come up with is the max MTU for the firewall I'm behind while pinging, right?  The max amounts I came up with for some of my devices were as follows: Corporate ASA 5510 > 1272 (if you add the 28 byte packet header that would make it 1300) Remote PIX 501 > 1416 (if you add the 28 byte packet header that would make it 1444) Remote ASA 5505 > 1418 (if you add the 28 byte packet header that would make it 1446)

So, do I just need to set my MTU values to the appropriate amounts?  I have tried changing the value, but I don't see any change in speed/performance.  But I also don't know if I need to reboot the firewalls after changing the MTU.  I know with Catalyst switches, you have to reload.  But I didn't see any messages about needing to reboot on the ASA's/PIX's.

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5505 Configure ASA For IPSec And SSL VPN

Jun 10, 2013

I currently have my 5505 setup for AnyConnect SSL VPN connections.  Is it possible to also configure the 5505 for IPSec VPN connections? So, essentially my ASA will be capable of running SSL and IPSec VPN tunnels, concurrently.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Configure L2L IPSEC VPN On ASR 1004

Jun 12, 2011

we are going to build L2L IPSEC VPN on ASR 1004 at our new datacenter edge. but i don't find any familiar CLI on my 1004. any special license,IOS-XE version or processor is required ? ASR1000-ESP10 is necessary ?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: PIX-501 IPSec To Configure Tunnel

Mar 24, 2011

I'm attempting to configure a tunnel on a PIX-501 version 6.3. It's an old device that's due to be replaced soon, but unfortunately we need a tunnel now... I have been using this document as a reference (6211): URL ,The remote end is a sonicwall.
The problem seems to be that the pix never sees the interesting traffic for the tunnel, and never tries to initiate a connection. I have enabled crypto ipsec and crypto isakmp debugs, but no data is ever displayed, even when attempting to access a device on the remote side of the tunnel! Someone had tried to set up this device with some tunnels in the past, but was never successful, so I'm thinking there might be remaining commands in the running-config causing problems.

View 7 Replies View Related

To Configure IPSEC Encryption

Jun 20, 2011

I have 2 Cisco 2811 routers that are installed in different locations. I set up a tunnel connection between the two routers.

View 15 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2851 - VPN Traffic Not Captured By IPSec Access List

Aug 29, 2012

we have two 2851's.  One in Australia, one in NZ, IPsec VPN between the two.
We have multiple subnets behind the tunnels. From all the sunbets in Aus we can reach all the subnets in NZ, except for one.  From NZ we can reach all the subnets in Aus.  The traceroute and pings from the subnet in question in Aus goes out the internet interface of the router instead of going into the tunnel.
The subnets in question are 10.110.220/24 (Aus), 10.110.250/24 (NZ)
The access lists at both ends cover the traffic required but for some reason when leaving Australia the traffic is not captured by:
Crypto Map "AUS-SYD" 20 ipsec-isakmp
Description: Auckland VPN
Peer =


View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1941 / IPSec Tunnel Up No Traffic?

Mar 7, 2013

I have an IPSec tunnel configured on my Cisco 1941. The other device is an ZyXEL router.I can see the tunnel is up but there is no traffic.This comes out the show crypto ipsec sa

interface: Dialer1
Crypto map tag: CMAP_AVW, local addr
   protected vrf: (none)
   local  ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (
   remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (
   current_peer port 500


View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Traffic Is Not Passing On Plain IPSec Tunnel Between Two 892s

Dec 14, 2011

I've replaced real networkID to the one mentined below.
Topology: classical IPSec VPN tunnel between two Cisco 892s, with pre-shared key and no GRE. One 892 (branch_892) has access to the Internet via PPPoE and has three networks/vlans behind it. One VLAN is NATed to access internet via the PPPoE. Access to two other VLANs - VL92 ( and VL93 ( need is done thrue the VPN tunnel.
Second 892 (892_DC) has just one interface - WAN on Gigabit enabled/connected and has a static route to the default GW. It does not have any interal network defined. So the router is strictly used to send traffic for VL92/VL93 to the branch 892 via IPSec tunnel.
Here is the problem: access to/from VL93 ( works, however for VL92 ( - does not.
From devices in VL92 I can ping the 892_DC IP address across the VPN tunnel. From the 892_DC router I can also ping devices in VL92. However I can no ping from VL92 any device beyond the 892_DC and at the same time packet arriving on 892_DC for VL92 are not sent out via the VPN tunnel.
I took the packet trace on 892_DC using capture point/buffer to capute packets for VL92 and could see that traffic does arrive at the 892_DC. I run the same capute on Branch_892 and there was not a single packet.More interesting I modified the access list such a way that left on VL92 and still - no packets are sent out thru the tunnel. [code]

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 2801 - Unable To Route Traffic Over IPsec / GRE Tunnels

Jan 12, 2013

I have an issue where I can get traffic to pass from HDQ to two branch offices over our ipsec/gre tunnels even though the tunnels appear to be UP. The HDQ is a 2811, branch is a home office using an 871W and branch runs a 2801 router. I initially had HDQ working fine with the 871W but when I configured branch2 (2801), they both broke. The tunnels appear to be up but traffic is not routing across them. The two 2801 routers run 12.4 (c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-24.T2.bin). These are gre over ipsec tunnels. Currently traffic flows over an exsting MPLS network that we are getting away from due to cost. As soon as I change the routes to point to the Tunnels, it breaks. Traffic doesn't appear to pass through the tunnel. I have attached my sanitized configs.

HDQ#sh crypto sessCrypto session current status
Interface: FastEthernet0/1Session status: UP-ACTIVEPeer: port 500  IKE SA: local remote Active  IPSEC FLOW: permit 47        Active SAs: 4, origin: crypto map  IPSEC FLOW:


View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Configure IPSEC Vpn On ASA 5505?

Mar 19, 2013

I am trying to configure an IPSEC vpn on an ASA5505 I setup an SSL vpn and it works fine, I can browse to the https: address log in and connnect to servers However when I try to setup the ipsec client access vpn it will not connect and I am getting the errors below I used the wizard for the initial configuration Looks like the inital IKE is being blocked or dropped?
%ASA-7-710005: UDP request discarded from my external IP/35781 to external:ASA-external/500
%ASA-7-710005: UDP request discarded from my external IP/35781 to external:ASA-external/137

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Configure IPSec Tunnels On 941SEC/K9?

May 26, 2013

My company paid a Cisco 1941 SEC/K9. There is no VPN SSL Licence. I would like to know if I can configure IPSec tunnels basically on my router?
In this case, how many IPSec Tunnels I can configure?
how configuring IPSec Tunnels on my router?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: How To Configure IPSec VPN With RV042G

Nov 11, 2012

How to configure an IPSec VPN with router RV042G.I need to know how to configure an IPSec VPN. Cisco Router with RV042G.
I spend this client your VPN parameters. [code]

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Configure IPsec Stateful Failover On 891?

Sep 15, 2011

We have purchased a couple of Cisco 891 routers - both are running IOS 15.0(1) M5 licensed with advanced IP services (default). The literature for these devices on Cisco's website claims they support IPsec stateful failover on advanced IP services.
Our intention is to configure them with HSRP and IPsec stateful failover to provide a highly-available default gateway and VPN end-point.
I have configured HSRP and that seems to work fine. My problem is that I cannot configure IPsec stateful failover. The documentation that I have found implies that I need to configure inter-device redundancy on a particular HSRP group and use the physical IP addresses on the interfaces within that group to allow stateful failover communication between the routers however the routers do not recognise the 'redundancy' command in config mode...
(config)# redundancy inter-device
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

View 5 Replies View Related

Configure Ipsec In Local Lan Between 3 Computers?

Sep 13, 2011

I need to connect 3 computers in local lan by using ipsec on win7. How can I do that? I tried to do something from windows firewall; but I see incorrect header checksum errors in wireshark.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA5500 / TCP State Bypass For Traffic - Coming From IPsec Tunnel?

Feb 6, 2012

We have problems on central firewall with restricting traffic coming from remote office from IPsec. (The network sheme is attached) All branch offices are connected to central asa though IPsec. The main aim is to rule access from branch offices only on the central firewall, NOT on each IPsec tunnel According to the sheme: is on of the branch office LANs10.1.1.0/24 and are central office LANThe crypto ACL looks like  permit ip the aim is to restrict access from to When packets are generated from host to all is ok -  they are dropped by acl2 When packets are generated from to they are not dropped by any ACL - the reason is stateful firewall - traffic bypasses all access lists on a back path I thought that TCP State Bypass feature can solve this problem and disable stateful firewall inspection for traffic coming from to, but it didn't work.The central asa 5500 is configured according to cisco doc [URL] 
access-list tcp_bypass_acl extended permit tcp
class-map tcp_bypass_map
description "TCP traffic that bypasses stateful firewall"
match access-list tcp_bypass_acl


View 4 Replies View Related

Copyrights 2005-15, All rights reserved