Cisco Wireless :: WRVS4400N Won't Route All Traffic Over IPsec
Dec 15, 2011
All of my remote sites use various routers to route all of their traffic via IPsec. However, I have one WRVS4400N w/firmware 2.0.2.1 configured with a working tunnel. My issue is I need to set the Remote Group to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 so all traffic is forced via IPsec tunnel and not out the local gateway. When I do the error, Remote Security Group and Local Security Group cannot be in the same network. However, it works with Cisco/Linksys RV042.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Oct 6, 2011
i want to set WRVS4400N Route all traffic through
it function as same as sonicwall Route All
[URL]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2011
i want to set WRVS4400N Route all traffic through, it function as same as sonicwall Route All.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 29, 2011
I need to route traffic to DMZ (and internal) from the branch office thru the IPSec tunnel. How do I manage that with my Cisco 881?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2012
We have 7 remote offices and 10 tower locations that utilize IPsec tunnels back to our HQ. We now want to force all traffic including web surfing through the tunnels. What would be the easiest way to acomplish this? I have tried utilizing the crypto map policy to do this, but was unable to acomplish this.
Each of our office locationss utilize a Cisco 2811 router and the tower locations utilize a Cisco 881.
View 21 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2011
We have multiple vpn tunnels coming to our cisco asa 5520 , the problem is that when we create another tunnel with the same network as another network on the firewall , it does not know how to route the traffic to which interface or sub interface.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2013
I have an issue where I can get traffic to pass from HDQ to two branch offices over our ipsec/gre tunnels even though the tunnels appear to be UP. The HDQ is a 2811, branch is a home office using an 871W and branch runs a 2801 router. I initially had HDQ working fine with the 871W but when I configured branch2 (2801), they both broke. The tunnels appear to be up but traffic is not routing across them. The two 2801 routers run 12.4 (c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-24.T2.bin). These are gre over ipsec tunnels. Currently traffic flows over an exsting MPLS network that we are getting away from due to cost. As soon as I change the routes to point to the Tunnels, it breaks. Traffic doesn't appear to pass through the tunnel. I have attached my sanitized configs.
HDQ#sh crypto sessCrypto session current status
Interface: FastEthernet0/1Session status: UP-ACTIVEPeer: 205.205.205.21 port 500 IKE SA: local 204.204.204.66/500 remote 205.205.205.21/500 Active IPSEC FLOW: permit 47 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 Active SAs: 4, origin: crypto map IPSEC FLOW:
[Code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2011
I have setup a ISA2006 as Internet firewall, and use 4400N as VPN Client, connect to ISA2006 via IPSec VPN, but it did not work.
Network topological as below:
Internet <------------> ISA2006 <-------------------------> local1 <------------>local2 <--------------------> WRVS4400N <----------> PC
Static Internet IP | 192.168.112.25 192.168.112.0/255 | 192.168.114.0/255
[Code]......
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2013
I bought a WRVS400N v2 to be used as an access point. Currently it is hooked up on my switch via a trunk port and is able to communicate with my gateway. Whenever I try to access an IP subnet other then the local IP address of the WRVS, I get a network unreachable error. To fix this for my local networks, I added the appropriate static route to cover my local LANs and that seems to work now. I tried to add route 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 using the web interface for internet access, but somehow it does not recognize this as a default route (quad zero!?). Does any know how I can set the default gateway in this router? Maybe, but hopefully not, I have to use the WAN port to create some kind of uplink and use one of the LAN ports to connect using the trunk port and route traffic for the clients over the WAN port .
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2009
WRVS4400N Version V2.0.0.7.I have been attempting for weeks to connect an IPSEC tunnel between a Cisco ASA 5510 Version 8.0(2) and a WRVS4400N . Phase one seems connect okay, where as phase two always give me the errors below. This as far as I have got, I tried disabling keep alive monitor, the device never attempted phase 2. I have read endless documentation on both devices and tried almost every combination of setting that I am aware of. The best case scenario answer would be detailed steps on how to setup the IPSEC VPN (linksys) & the site to site VPN (CISCO) as I cannot find any reference material for this combination .
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2013
I have a remote WRVS4400N that has a dynamic outside address that's initiating a connection to a ASA 5540 with a static address.
I'm all set on the ASA side. My questions relate to the 4400N. It doesn't appear to have a very robust configuration/setup available for L2L tunnels. For one my encryption is limited to 3DES.
But I'm wondering if I'm missing something in the config. I have to set up L2L tunnels to two other firewalls. One firewall has 3 discontiguous networks, and the other has 2. I have 5 tunnels setup, is this the only way? What I would like to see is 2 tunnels, one for each remote firewall, but then each tunnel would have access to the appropriate networks (like on the ASA side), is there anyway to do this? Perhaps a command line util for this unit?
My other issue relates to the tunnel-groups I have set up on my ASA's, and I would like to use appropriate names...however I can't seem to find a way to enable this to happen on the 4400N side....what I mean is I need a way to create either a "keyword identifier" or a "firewall identifier" on the 4400N and I don't see an appropriate field in the web interface.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2012
i have a WRVS4400N Router and behind that router i am running a OPENSWAN Server. I know that the WRVS4400N has a VPN Service on board, but for specific reasons i'd like to use my own ipsec server.
The problem is that i cannot forward the IPSEC Paketes (4500 and 500) coming from the internet interface to the LAN. All other port forwardings like SSH works. I think the reason is that the IPSEC Services (Pluto, etc.) are already running on the router and therefore the pakets cannot be forwarded. The log shows all forwarded port (e.g. SSH) but does not show any IPSEC traffic.
I'd like to turn off the VPN Service on the router, but I cannot find any configuration switch that allow my to do so.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2012
I'm trying to find a reference for how many IPSEC tunnels the WRVS4400N can passthrough.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Oct 7, 2011
I have a WRVS4400N, and need to apply access control to an IPSec tunnel that terminates at a client site, but can't seem to make the device comply.
I can configure ACLs on their device for the LAN to restrict packets coming back into my network, and can restrict packets outbound frm my LAN but that is hardly a secure method of doing this in my opinion.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 10, 2007
I have set-up a Linksys BEFVP41 VPN router at home (192.168.1.1 / 255.255.255.0)
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 29, 2012
we've buyed a WRVS4400N to create a IPSEC VPN tunnel to our client in order to access some applications.
After a while trying to configure the router, we have archieved it and the VPN tunnel is up. We can see the tunnel up from here and from client's side as well.
Our client supposendly have created the tunnel in order to access a list of specific IPs in the range 10.113.x.x, but if we try to access this IPs via telnet whe cannot obtain any response.
Making a tracert, we obtain...
C:UsersHuexxx>tracert 10.113.56.177
Traza a 10.113.56.177 sobre caminos de 30 saltos como máximo.
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.0.1
2 * * * Tiempo de espera agotado para esta solicitud.
3 * * ^C
... and therefor the client doesn't receive any packet at its firewall.
I've tried to establish a static route for 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 to their remote gateway, but I'm unable to add any entry to static routing list... The router tries to do something, but afterall I cannot see the new entry...
What can I do to route the traffic through the tunnel?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2012
i measured with Iperf over two Cisco 1811 router, that bandwidth speed is higher then is used IPsec+GRE tunnel between two routers, than just using a static routes.Bandwidth over GRE in average is about 91389Kbit/sec Over static routes is about 88474Kbit/sec.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 9, 2011
I have on my ethernet linux box, that is responsible for IPv6. This box is configured as IPv6 gateway from my network and it also sends RA to the network. All devices on ethernet network can work on IPv6 without problem. Clients, that are connected to WiFi, they just receive the RA from this box -> this packet is sended over WRVS4400N to the wifi network. But all other traffic do not pass the WRVS4400N, so the wifi client is not able to ping the IPv6 gateway. There is no problem on IPv4, there the wifi client is able to communicate with any ethernet device.I have tested WRVS4400N setting "ipv4 only". If I switch on "ipv4 and ipv6", than all devices will get some additional IPv6 adresses and the communication from WiFi client to IPv6 router is not working again. How to configure the WRVS4400N to bridge all IPv6 traffic between WiFi and ethernet?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 5, 2011
I am monitoring my WRVS4400N with SNMP and create graphs by MRTG. Problem is that data about traffic are strange, very low. I have 50 MB line but max traffic shown on graphs is about 8000 bits per second. Also the "shape" of graph does not correspond with real traffic.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 30, 2011
Is it possible to re-route our Site 2 Site VPN over our Static Route (T1) if the WAN fails?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2012
Configured cisco 881, WAN has static IP address and LAN is nothing fancy. I can ping out to url... or anywhere from the router but cannot from LAN client computers. [code]
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 19, 2010
I have a 2821 router with two T1 WICs and have the need to route FTP down one T1 and all other TCP traffic down another T1. All traffic is going to the same remote IP address. The remote sites are in different states, and I assume that the remote subnet is being bridged between the states. It's kind of a weird set up, but it's not my design.
Anyway, can I use a route map to split off FTP traffic to host A and send it down one T1 and have the rest of the IP traffic to host A go down the other T1? I also need to be able to have all traffic use one T1 in case the other T1 goes down.
My first thought was to static all IP down T1-1, then route map FTP traffic down T1-2, then have a floating static for all IP traffic down T1-2 with a higher metric. But something would have to track the T1 interfaces and I'm not sure if route maps or static routes can do that. Any thoughts on this?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2011
I have a router that supports wireless network. I have 2 desktop computers that connect through LAN, 3 Laptops that connect using WiFi. Lot of them use utorrent. I want to block it. They use it to download movies. I have warned them of consequences but they simply dont listen. I dont know how to implement QoS in my router. Mine is UTStarCom.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2012
I currently have a site to site VPN running connecting a branch office and the Main office using a ASA5510 and ASA 5505. currently PC's at the branch can access the network in the main office using interface 0/1, but we have added another ip range using interface 0/2 and I can't seem to route the traffic to both interfaces. I currently have 0/1 as inside 192.168.10.1 which works, and have added 0/2 as Inside2 192.168.20.1. I know I am forgetting something, any commands to route incoming VPN traffic so PC's at the branch office can connect to both IP ranges?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2012
The router passes the Interface test for the WAN port in CCP but it still we cannot access the internet. Here is my configuration:
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 3663 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 09:29:52 Chicago Mon Feb 20 2012 by fbcpekin
version 15.1
[Code].......
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2012
I want to route gre traffic through an ACE20, but it doesn't seem to work. The only thing I configured was an ACL with gre enabled, but the ACE20 seems to drop the gre packtes. The gre traffic is entering via the vlan 561 interface and should be send out via the vlan 472 interface. Source 10.94.32.212, destination 10.94.132.39. The tunnel control traffic on port tcp/1723 is working fine. In the service-policies is nothing configured for the gre traffic.
Code...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2011
I have a two RV042 VPN Router, I successfully connected the IPSEC tunnel. I cannot route Traffic in the tunnel. See the diagram.
MAIN Network
10.252.x.x
-------------->
FIREWALL
a.a.a.1
INTERNET
RV042a WANa <<------------------------------->> WANb RV042b
a.a.a.2 b.b.b.b
In this manner the network of b.b.b.b wil connect to the Main Network 10.252.x.x, unfortunately I can't pass traffic to RV042b going to RV042a. Everytime I trace the route, the traffic goes outside the Internet not to RV042a.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2012
I'm station overseas and it's really hard to access certain websites and servie like Netflix or ESPN. What I had created was GRE tunnel from my Home "A" to my current location "B" and route my traffic from point A to B using 2 cisco 1700 routers ( and It was working great) but now I can't use GRE nomore. I still have PIX and ASA on both sides and I was trying to do that over VPN tunnel but I can't ping VPN tunnel gateway( basicly what was next hoop in GRE) on the other end ( which is the main problem why I can't route traffic to remote site). I was wondering if I can still do the same thing over VPN tunnel that I did with GRE tunnel.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2012
I am trying to configure dual ISP on my ASA5505.I have everything configured and working when eth0/0 is connected, but when I disconnect it, it doesn't route any traffic.The static route for the primary isp is removed and the static route to the backup isp shows up, but no traffic goes in or out. I should note that I'm doing this as a proof of concept so eth0/0 is connected to a router and eth0/1 is connected to another router. [code]
View 7 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2011
I am using OPEN VPN in order to connect to a Canadian VPN server.I want ALL internet traffic to ONLY use the VPN connection and no traffic shall pass through my local ISP under any circumstance.In the event the VPN disconnects, I DO NOT want any internet traffic automatically sent via my LOCAL ISP connection. Can I simply disable my LAN network adapter in windows AFTER the vpn is connected? (since vpn uses its own TAP adapter?)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 5, 2012
I have a media player wired to my dir-655. I have a wrt300 on the same network to use for vpn. I live in Canada, and to use Netflix etc, from the US, I need to use the vpn.Is it possible to have the media player routed through the wrt300, rather than discovering all the IP addresses for Netflix etc and routing each one?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 18, 2011
I have a customer which has a main location office and a remote one. Recently we interconnect their facilities using a local ISP service called Virtual Connectivity, which basically is a private network which can be accessed over aDSL or any other data circuit. They are using Cisco 888 routers to interconnect both sites.At the main site the customer also has an Internet circuit (with a Cisco 857 router)and he wants to remove the Internet circtuit from the remote site and provide them access over their main location Internet circuit.At the primary offices, we installed Cisco 2811 router as a gateway to route the Internet and remote network traffic over the required data circuit. Everything is working fine, but we can not access Internet from the remote location over the circuit installed a the main site. I understand this is a routing issue, since the traffic hits the main office network it does not knows how to reach the Internet. I am assuming this routing must be set into the main office Cisco 888 router (installed by the ISP to interconnect to their private cloud) in order to properly route it over the Internet circuit.Since I already have access over the Internet router and the gateway router at the main site, but not into the ISP router, is there any other way I can make this configurtion over the routers I already have access?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 22, 2011
I am working for a company based in Sydney Australia, the company recently open an office in London UK, therefore we are going to get leased lined based on MPLS.We were advised that Customer Edge router will be CISCO1941/K9. We want to our UK client to access our web-based applications via MPLS network instead of internet. The UK office is using BT Business ADSL with 5 Static IP address (please note the modem IP address is actually dynamic), we are going to get a Cisco 857/K9 router which will be used for the entry for the UK client to access the MPLS network. My question will be how do I configure the Cisco 857 router to allow one of the public ip to access the MPLS network. It appears that there are two options, and I am not sure if this is going to work or which one is working better. I have attached two diagrams for clarification of my case.
Option 1 Cisco WAN interface get Dynamic IP (PPPoA) from BT LAN Interface (4 Port) get the assigned 5 Static IP addresses One of the five IPs (217.xx.xx.169) will be assigned to the FE1 (Cisco 1941), any traffic to 217.xx.xx.169 will be routed to the WAN interface of Cisco 1941 to access Sydney service (located in Sydney LAN, mostly http and https traffic) One of the five IPs to 217.xx.xx.170 will be assigned to the WAN interface of Sonicwall Firewall Router which also serve as Internet Access Gateway for LAN users, All trafiic destined for Sydney LAN will be using FE0 (Cisco 1941) as gateway
Option 2Cisco WAN interface get Dynamic IP (PPPoA) from BT LAN Interface (4 Port) will get 192.168.0.1, Cisco 857 router will be the default gateway for LAN users, using one to many NAT, also one to one NAT, One of the five IPs (217.xx.xx.169) will be forwarded to the FE0 (Cisco 1941), any traffic to 217.xx.xx.169 will be routed to the WAN interface of Cisco 1941 to access Sydney service (located in Sydney LAN, mostly http and https traffic)
View 4 Replies
View Related
