Cisco VPN :: ASA 5505 - Access Two Private Networks
Dec 4, 2011
i have Cisco 5505 and i configured a remote VPN clients. here is my scenario
Cisco switch 2950 === holds two private network 192.168.8.x and 192.168.4.x
vlan 2 outside interface - Eth 0/0 155.155.155.x
Vlan 1 inside interface -- Eth 0/1 192.168.8.180
VPN pool ip address = 192.168.8.100 --110
I drag i cable from my Cisco switch and put in to Eth0/1. and i want to access this two private networks 192.168.4.x and 192.168.8.x . Now i can access to 192.168.8.x . But i can't access 192.168.4.x ..
I am looking to create an office network with each person having internet access but on a private network. however everyone will need to be able to access a communal printer. would they be able to see it if they were all on a different subnet or would i need to set up vlans?
I'm currently trying to configure a Site to Site tunnel between an IOS Router and an ASA 5505 running 9.1
When the private subnet of the IOS Router was 10.0.0.0/24 and the private subnet of the ASA was 172.16.1.0/24, it connected fine.
I'm now trying to set it up where both private networks are 10.0.0.0/24, and created network objects, edited the ACL for interesting traffic, and created the twice NAT translation rule, but the tunnels aren't coming up.
There is the IOS Router(R1) and the ASA(F2). In between them is one Internet posing router that is just set up to allow both sides to reach their WAN addresses.
R1 and F2 have private network (10.0.0.0/24) and need to communicate. Twice NAT can be done all on the ASA to allow this, but I must be doing something wrong. The way I understand it, is that the R1 should see the traffic coming from 10.51.0.0/24 and sending to that traffic. The ASA will take that traffic, and the inside network should see it come inbound as 10.50.0.0/24. So the F2 private network communicates with 10.50.0.0/24 and R1 private network sends traffic to 10.51.0.0/24.
I turned on "Debug crypto ipsec" and "debug crypto isakmp" but no output is showing up or giving any hint that it is trying to establish anything.
R1#show run version 12.4 hostname R1 crypto isakmp policy 50encr 3desauthentication pre-sharegroup 2crypto isakmp key cisco address 10.2.0.254
We have configured a Cisco ASA 5505 with AnyConnect access. This works great. However, these users cannot seem to ping devices on the private network. We have configured all devices on the network with a 10.10.10.0/24 address space. The inside interface of the ASA i 10.10.10.1/24 and the VPN return addresses are 10.10.10.50 - 10.10.10.65/24.They users can utilize SSH and Oracle or MySQL calls but cannot seem to ping. Obviously, I am over looking something.
A customer has a ASA 5505 with a remote access vpn. They are moving their internal network to a new scheme and would like users who come in on the vpn to access both the exisiting and new networks. Currently the can only access the exisiting. WHen users connect to the remote access vpn, the asa gives them an address of 192.168.199.x. The current internal network is 200.190.1.x and they would like to reach their new network of 10.120.110.x.
i have two cisco 2800 routers , and i have three different networks , so can cisco routers supports more than one private network example,My First location i have one public connection of 200.100.100. 1 and private network of 192.168.1.x network and the second router i have one public connection of 200.100.100.10 and two private networks of 192.168.50.x and 192.168.60.x , So can i route my first location to this two different networks , because my router have only two FastEthernet connection , so how it's possible or not.
I have two private networks and want/need to route traffic between them. I also have an ISP connection and want/need to provide internet to at least one of the private networks. Providing internet access to both is not required or desired.
Can this be accomplished with an RV042? If so, how?
P.s. The problem space, once again, in a non-narrative form with some addresses thrown in:
Private Network A: 192.168.200.0/24 Private Network B: 10.50.3.96/27 ISP Network C: 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.0.1GW 192.168.0.2 is WAN1 address on RV042
I have a new customer that needs to send data to us occasionally, we normally install the Cisco VPN Client on their PC, but this customer has the same private network we do.
I know this could be done with NAT Policy on my ASA 5510 with a site-to-site VPN, but the customer does not want to change the network hardware or addressing. They have cable router with no VPN capability, and they don't want to spend any more money on this project.
Can this work if their are no duplication of IP addresses?
how to redistribute routes between three independently managed private networks.
Currently: See attachment The two buildings managed by Company 1 are connected by 4x1GB fibre channel ports on Cisco 3750G Standard Image switches. Static routing is used between the two building and static routes are used to direct traffic to Company 2 and Company 3 via routers managed by their respective companies. No NAT is required as all three companies use separate private address schemes.
Network Improvements: See attachment To increase network resilience Companies 2 and Company 3 are planning on installing new routers in building 2. Companies 2 and 3 use Dynamic routing protocols on their internal network. Incoming and outgoing resilience is required in all three companies. There is no direct connectivity between Company 2 and 3.
I would like the following questions answered:
1. Is dynamic routing needed in Company 1?
2. Given that only 4 devices are managed by Company 1 will RIPv2 work? NB. Company 2 and 3 have very large networks (3000+ sites).
3. Would route redistribution be best performed on Company 2 and 3’s CE routers?
4. How can route redistribution be controlled by Company 1?
We have a private network, multiple vlans etc. for our domain users/employees across several amenities. We also have a Public network, that we have managed by a 3rd party for guests/conference rooms/attendees.Private network is all static ips, mac restricted port security, as strict as possible from a security and PCI Compliance standpoint. The public network is all DHCP with hundreds of users. Having them physically separate has always been the best option. Separate switches, server, and I even have the uplinks separated on a 3825 router. However, unfortunately it seems as though that luxury is coming to an end.One of the meetings that is taking place is going to be at one of our outer amenities so I've got to push that "public" network through my network, over my backhaul to the other side.
My suggestion was to create a new vlan on the switches with the shortest path possible to get where it needs to go. This way the traffic never goes through our ASA, and it has a small footprint on our network, it plugs into the switch access port with the dedicated vlan at the entry point into our network, and leaves from an access port on the other end. To me that seems to be the best/most secure way to handle it. We're also in the process of rolling out Public Wifi through the entire property and since we'll want to push both Public and Private vlans over it....merging the two networks to a point is only inevitable. Especially since it will be going through a controller and the property covers a good 7000 acres.
A good IDS/IPS...other than already having port security on every port, I'd definitely like to know if somebody inadvertently cross connects the two networks and it starts flooding whatever vlan access port it's plugged in to with dhcp...especially since a lot of the laptop users on the domain are set to DHCP first with a static in the alternate for working at the office and remote.
Currently a network consists of two subnets, one subnet is behind a ASA and the other behind a PIX, both connecting to the ISP's routers. If the PIX is retired, is it possible to create/consolidate the two networks protected by the ASA5510 with the default gateway being the ISP?
How can two private networks be protected by the ASA5510? One conceptual way is to create the VLANS on a layer 3 switch, on the "inside" interface of the ASA. In this senario what would the "inside" network's IP address? If the above is possible, how would natting occur?
Is there an efficient configuration to protect two networks protected by the 5510, other than creating a DMZ?
Is it possible to create two private networks with same level of security, 100 on a three network interface connections?
I'm going to move offices into a shared situation with 3 companies. Each company will want its own private network so there's no snooping between companies. I am planning on using VOIP for the phone system (Nextiva cloud based). Is it possible to set up the system so that each company has access to the VOIP system but yet remains sequestered in the their own network for everything else. I was hoping to do this with one data port at each workstation using Cisco SPA-303 phones. The way I understand this, is that the phone plugs in to the data port and you daisy chain the workstation off from each phone. Is this possible to do this while having the system I described? Another wrinkle is that I'd also like all the networks to be access shared printers.
We have many remote offices that we want to add public wifi and a couple of other services that would be completely outside of our internal network. Each office has a 3750 with plenty of open ports. How can I safely create a vlan for public access on these switches which currently have our internal network on. I have read that people are doing this to save on the cost of purchasing a dedicated switch. Some people are using access lists and one person mentioned creating a private vlan for the public network. I looked up private vlan and it seemed bit confusing.
I am new to networking and configuring a ASA 5505. I have one public IP and would like to know if I can Nat this ip to 2 private IP addresses. Both addresses will be passing similar traffic.
I have purchased a subnet of 8 private IP addresses from my ISP. 109.x.x.128/29.The ISP has placed a juniper router within our data centre which is routing purely from 109.x.x.206/30 to 109.x.x.128/29 with the ip of fa0/1 set to .129.
I have linked a cisco 5505 to fa0/1 of the juniper from fa0/0 and configured its IP to .130. I have configured NAT to translate our client pool 192.168.16.x /24 address' to the internet.
Is it possible for the 5505 to route / map my remaing private IP addresses through its external port? I have tried creating a seperate VLAN for a DMZ for our servers to sit within but am returned with a subnetting error as VLAN for my external port is all ready configured within the same subnet.
I currently have a hub-and-spoke VPN configuration with 6 ASA 5505's at remote sites all connected to an ASA 5510 at HQ via IPSEC lan-to-lan tunnels. My current configuration allows hosts on the remote site networks to talk to hosts on the HQ network, but not to hosts on the other remote sites.I have receieved a request to allow comminucation between the remote sites as well, with traffic all routed through the 5510 at HQ.
I would like to configure a Cisco ASA 5505 with Dual ISP (ISP 1 and ISP2) and two networks (network 1 and network 2). My customer need that clients in the network 1 connect to Internet with ISP1 and clients in the network 2 connect with ISP2. If a failure occurs in ISP1 (just an example) the network 1 clients connect with ISP2.
1. I currently have a Comcast Business Class Gateway, Cisco 2100 Series WLAN Controller and a Cisco ASA 5505 all connected together to supply LAN and WLAN internet connections on my network.
2. I also have a Card Access Security System on it owns network. It currently does not have internet access.
I would like to put my security system on the internet so that I can support it remotely. To do this, it has to be on a firewalled internet connection.Can I put the two networks on my ASA 5505 and keep them seperate? I don't want to provide a path into the Security System through my current LAN & WLAN. But I do need a frewalled internet connection on my Security System. I am trying to avoid purchasing a seperate firewall.
I'm fairly new to cisco and the ASA 5505 I have the asa connected to the internet on 0/0 I have a computer connected to port 1 and on port 2 I have a netgear router. the asa is 192.168.1.1 and the netgear router is 10.1.5.1 I cannot get the computer connected to the asa to communicate with the devices on the netgear router and visa versa. Here is the show version.
I'm using asa 5505 with 8.4(2) and have the following problem.I have 2 Networks. each Network has it's own externel Internet-Ip and also Mail-Server. [code]
Now I want a communication between the two Mailservers with their external Ip-Address.I did a static NAT from ipnt any to int any or also from int routed to int routed, but nothing worked.Packet tracer showed at NAT-Lookup where the externel adress of the second Mailserver is passed: Info Static translate Network1 to Network1
But it should show a translation from network1 to network1-external.Due to Security reasons, I cannot paste the whole config.Under 8.0 I did the same configuration with Policy-Nat and it worked.
We have Cisco ASA 5505 with ASDM 5.2 We have one Proxy server in our Local Lab and pointed to Hosted service(Simple Signal)issue is, When our proxy server send register to hosted server, ASA change private IP and post with outside IP and src port as 1063 every time.
Here is debug log on real time monitoring.
Aug 24 2011 05:21:19 302015 203.xxx.xxx.226 192.168.1.51 Built outbound UDP connection 3774 for outside:203.xxx.xxx.226/5060 (203.xxx.xxx.226/5060) to inside:192.168.1.51/27014 (99.119.161.107/1142) Aug 24 2011 05:21:19 607001 203.xxx.xxx.226 Pre- allocate SIP Via UDP secondary channel for inside:192.168.1.51/27014 to outside:203.xxx.xxx.226 from REGISTER message Aug 24 2011 05:21:19 710005 203.xxx.xxx.226 99.xxx.xxx.107 UDP request discarded from 203.xxx.xxx.226/5060 to outside:99.xxx.xxx.107/1063
Here 99.xxx.xxx.107 is Our ASA Outside IP address 203.xxx.xxx.226 is Hosted server IP address. My ASA config is attached.
I am able to create 2 LAN networks (192.168.9.0 and 172.16.9.0) Vlan1 and Vlan12 respectively. I also setup 2 outside interfaces (outside1 and outside2).
Network 1 (192.168.9.0 - VLAN1) has no issues going out via Outside1, however I can't get Network 2 (172.16.9.0 - VLAN 12) to go thru outside2.
I put in a static route (route outside 172.16.9.0 255.255.255.0 x.x.x.x), the x.x.x.x is the default gateway of my ISP.
I am new to Cisco ASA and have been configuring my new firewall but one thing have been bothering. I cannot get internal networks and routing between them to work as I would like to. Goal is to set four networks and control access with ACL:s between those.
1. Outside 2. DMZ 3. ServerNet1 4. Inside
ASA version is 9.1 and i have been reading on two different ways on handling IP routing with this. NAT Exempt and not configuring NAT at all and letting normal IP routing to handle internal networks. No matter how I configure, with or without NAT I cannot get access from inside network to DMZ or from ServerNet1 to DMZ. Strange thing is that I can access services from DMZ to Inside and ServerNet1 if access list allows it. For instance DNS server is on Inside network and DMZ works great using it. [code]
We recently changed locations and acquired a new circuit from our provider. They also connected our remote branch office to our main office through MPLS. Now, as I understand it, the branch office basically connects back to the main office through our providers network (MPLS). We have a new router at the branch office which has a gateway of 192.168.1.225. The clients in that office have IP's of 192.168.1.96 - 100, using the gateway of 192.168.1.225.
The main office network is 192.168.0.0 (Gateway of 192.168.0.1)
At this end (Main office), I also have a new Cisco 2900 provided by the ISP, with port 0/0 for the outside connection (connected to the 0 port on my ASA 5505). The ASA's port 1 obviously running into my network hub. The provider tells me that port 0/1 on the 2900 is or should be used to connect the branch office back to here and has an IP of 192.168.0.225, as that's how the provider provisioned it. So, I plug that into the ASA's Ethernet port 0/2. And I'm assuming they have a route setup either on the 2900 or the router in the branch office so that 192.168.1.225 can reach me here at 192.168.0.0.
There is already a static route setup on the ASA: (192.168.1.0 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.225 1). As soon as I plug in the cable, the IP phones at the branch office work, but they can't access the internet or any resources in the main office. My questions are:
1. Shouldn't I be able to just go straight from the 0/1 port on the Cisco 2900 to my hub. At first I was plugging right into the ASA, but I don't think I need to do that, why go from the branch office through my ASA to access resources and then back out the ASA for internet. If they're already coming from 192.168.1.225, through the MPLS network, then they should go right to my network and then back out the ASA.
2. They have to route through the ASA first, in which case, do I need to setup another VLAN for that branch network in conjunction with a static route? I can ping the router and hosts in the branch office through the ASA only!
I'm usually not working with this product, but this is what I'm trying to do.I have 2 internal networks setup on our Cisco ASA 5505 firewall. (not done by me, I'm a new to this product)I'm trying to access a server on one network from a PC located on the other internal network. (preferable through the web gui)When I try "Packet Tracer" from interface "Trust4" it fails on the NAT phase.(Source ip: 10.0.4.99, Destination ip: 10.0.6.99) When I check the NAT rule, it says: Type Source Interface AddressDynamic any outside outside.
I use a ASA 5510 and a ASA 5505 and want to connect 2 networks via VPN ASA software version is 8.41. Network 1 has address 192.168.90.0 Network 2 has the address 192.168.5.0 I use site to site VPN wizard on both asa and create the VPN connection. do I need to create acl after that?the PCs on network 1 must have access to a resource in the network 2 how do I create static routing to connect the both Network.
I just installed a new ASA 5505 for an office with three internal subnets. The three networks can each get online fine and ping eachother, but cannot browse to shares on the two internal networks other than their own. How do I configure the ASA to allow all traffic between these three inside networks?
I'm setting up a Cisco ASA 5510.I did the setup for my public and private interface.From the management software I can ping any outside domain using my public interface, but when I try to do that from my private interface I cannot.Also for some reason my ip phone connected to the private interface work (I'm able to make and receive call), but any computer that I connect to the private interface I cannot access the internet.
I have a VPN with a number of servers where we are doing some software development. We have a TFS, Web, App and SQL Server etc.. inside a private LAN which is accessible via VPN. Nothing inside the private network can access outbound. However, I would like to open the Web Server on the private LAN to be able to be accessed via http(s).As we develop the software I want to access the site from the internet.It's a fairly simple setup.DSL > Modem > Home Lan. On the Home Lan I have a Server (2 ethernets) connected to the modem router and the other card to a hub. This server acts as the VPN server, DHCP etc.. for the Private LAN.The web server I want to be able to access from outside is the one inside the private network. Any recommendations?fyi, I'm not a networking guy, I hacked my way through setting up the private network through a number of great YouTube videos, that saved me a lot of time.
I am living in an apartment complex with free wireless Internet and i turned this old pentium 4 computer into a web/media/file server. I want to be able to access my server away from home but i am extremely limited and i can not forward ports and I have no other kind of network privileges. I am a complete idiot when it comes to networking solutions and I am trying to learn. I have a very vague understanding of vpns and dynamic dns services but i do not understand what i need to access my server from a different network. I setup dns services for my home server but still have not been able to resolve hostnames to actual y point to my server or maybe my networks firewall is blocking me.
I would like to understand how public IP works in remote access. I do have belkin router and when I access it remote I type my public IP and after it the port number for example xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80 and if I would like to access an IP cam remotely in the same network i would do the same thing xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5656 (public IP). I do know my Public IP is unique.Thus, its quite logical I can access my devices remotely. my understanding of the port number is application specific that addresses packets in different applications in the same computer. For example port 80 is for HTTP connection used browsing the web, for chatting in MSN i will use different port number specifically for MSN...etc. my question is how I can access my belkin router remotely by typing the public IP and the port number knowing that the port number is application specific not device specific? My second question is, is it possible to access two routers in the same network remotely?
I am trying to provide internet access to public and private SSID's on Cisco AP541n using VLAN's connected directly to ASA5505. VLAN1 is inside interface (private) and VLAN12 is wlan interface (public SSID). The AP541n is plugged into switch port 0/7 on an ASA 5505.Port 0/7 is configured as trunk mode. I have internet access when connected to private SSID but no internet access when connected to public SSID. why I can't access internet on public SSID?
logging class ip history emergencies mtu inside 1500 mtu outside 1500
