We have a site-site and remote vpn configured in same interface in ASA 5520 ( software version 8.3 ). When Remote vpn users try to connect to computers located on the distant end of site-site VPN, their request failed. I tried No-Nat between remote vpn private IP to the remote site private IP, also stated the same in Split tunneling. I cant find even the tracert, ping also timed out.
View 7 RepliesWe have ordered a pair of Cisco ASA5520 (ASA5520-BUN-K9).Now there is a requirement to terminate site-to-site VPN from remote site. Do we need VPN plus licence for this and how much it cost?
View 1 Replies View Relatedwe have two ASA 5510s one in 8.4(4) and one in 8.2(5) in a site-to-site VPN setup. All internal traffic is working smoothly.Site/Subnet A: 192.160.0.0 - local (8.4(4)) Site/Subnet B: 192.260.0.0 - remote (8.2(5)) VPN Users: 192.160.40.0 - assigned by ASA When you VPN into the network, all traffic hits Site A, and everything on subnet A is accessible.
Site B however, is completely inaccessible for VPN users. All machines on subnet B, the firewall itself, etc... is not reachable by ping or otherwise.There are also some weird NAT rules that I am not happy with that were created after I upgraded Site A ASA to 8.4
Site A internal: 192.160.x.x External: 55.55.555.201(main)/202(mail)
Site B (over site-to-site) is 192.260.x.x External: 66.66.666.54(all)
I pretty much just have the basic NAT rules for VPN, Email, Internet and the site-to-site.What do I need to add for the VPN to be able to access the site-to-site network?
Here is my NAT config:
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static VPN_Network VPN_Network no-proxy-arp route-lookup
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static DOMAIN_REMOTE DOMAIN_REMOTE no-proxy-arp route-lookup
!
object network DMZ_Network
nat (DMZ,Outside) dynamic interface
object network DOMAIN_LOCAL
[code]....
Remote-access users aren't able to reach our remote network through a site-to-site VPN tunnel between two ASA 5505's.
I've seen several threads about that here, I've run through the walkthrough at [URL] I've taken a stab at setting split tunnelling and nat exemption, but it seems I'm still missing something. Remote-access users can reach the main site, but not the remote site.
Remote-access (vpn-houston) uses 192.168.69.0/24.
The main site (houston) uses 10.0.0.0/24
The remote site (lugoff) uses 10.0.1.0/24
I have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.
View 2 Replies View RelatedThe scenario where a Site to Site VPN tunnel has been established between Site A and Site B. Lan on Site A can ping Lan on Site B. My problem is a Printer behind Site B needs to be accessed by using the WAN IP address of Site A. Also i could not ping the remote lan or printer from the router.
Below are my configure on the Cisco 877 in site A.
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5425 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 15:09:21 PCTime Fri Jun 15 2012 by admin01
!
version 12.4
no service pad
[code]....
cisco products and am struggling getting a VPN going between an ASA 5505 and 5510. I have a VPN created (using the VPN wizward on both) and it shows the VPN is up, but I can't ping the remote site (from either side).
View 11 Replies View RelatedI am trying to establish routing between two Site to Site vpn tunnels, both of which are terminating on the same outside interface of my Cisco ASA.
find attached Network Diagram for the same. All Firewalls used are Cisco ASA 5520.
Both VPN tunnels between Point A and Point B, Point B and Point C too are up. I have enabled Same security level intra interface permit command also.
How do i enable traffic originating from LAN Subnets behind Point A to reach LAN Subnets behind Point C without having to create a Seperate tunnel between Point A and Point C
We have 3 sites, with a Cisco ASA 5520 at each location.
HQ (Headquarters) internal network: 172.16.110.0/24,
DR (Disaster Recovery) internal network: 172.16.120.0/24
BO (Branch Office) internal network: 172.16.150.0/24
HQ and DR have a 100Mbps permanent MPLS link between each other.Branch Office has a Site 2 Site VPN connection to HQ. If it fails, it establishes a Site 2 Site VPN connection to DR. This works perfectly.Now the routing issue... There is no route to the BO in the routing table at HQ/DR. The default gateway is used to reach the BO and that works for HQ when the VPN is between HQ/BO. If the VPN fails over to DR/BO, HQ can't reach BO anymore.I need to have some kind of conditional route injection from the ASA where the VPN is established. I was considering a tracked static route, but I was wondering if the S2S VPN itself has a functionality to do so. I thought the Reverse Route Injection was it but it's enabled on our crypto map and doesn't seem to work...
i have 2 router asa 5505 with base license i wanna make site to site vpn connection and remote site using vpn client to connect first i have hdsl router with 5 public ip i wanna try it by giving 1 public ip to each router and try the vpn but nothing work?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have configured a site to site tunnel from our ASA to another organizations Cisco 3030. It appears to have just one way initiation. We can do a ping to a device on the remote site and it will ping just fine. however, when the tunnel needs to be initiated from the remote site, it will not work until we have initiated the tunnel and then everything works.
I continue to see Error processing payload: Payload ID: 1 errors on the ASDM logs.It appears that all the configuration is in place because we can in fact establish the IPSec tunnel unidirectional. And once established, traffic can flow bidirectional.
What are the possibilities that exist for running a site to site vpn in our environment with the following infrastructure Cisco ASA 5520 - running on a multiple context mode
-Cisco 3750 switches
-Microsoft TMG
I believe these options are limited in terms of providing end point for VPN.Is there a VPN module that we can buy for 5520 to run IPSEC VPN?
I setup RA-VPN under local asa 5510 IP pool (192.168.127.0/24) and all was working fine. I got internet and local network access.
Then i have 5 site to site VPN working fine but when im traying to access to those L2L VPNs from the remote acces client im not able to do that. So after that i decided to obtain IP addresses from my DHCP server so i can obtain IPs from my local network (172.17.16.0/16) and then access normally to the VPN site to site. But the surprise was that the VPN cisco client is getting local IP address (172.17.16.222) perfectly but im not able to access even to my local network.
I have the same-security-traffic permit inter-interface same-security-traffic permit intra-interface enable.
I have two Cisco routers - 2911 in HQ and RV180 in branch office. Because in HQ LAN network I have some development servers, to which guys from branch office need to have acces, I decided to setup VPN site-to-site between HQ and branch office. Everything went quite smoothly, on both devices I see, that ipsec connection is established. Unfortunately I am not able to ping resources from one network to other one and vice versa. Below is the configuration of 2911 router (I skipped som unimportant (imho) configuration directives) :
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
hash md5
[Code].....
I am try to configure ASA 5510 with 8.3 IOS version.My internal users are 192.168.2.0/24 and i configured dynamic PAT and are all internet .
i want configure identity NAT for remote access VPN.Remote users IP pool is 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10
i know to configure NAT exemption in IOS 7.2 version. But here IOS 8.3 version. configure NAT exemption for 192.168.2.0/24 to my remote pool( 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10).
I have a ASA 5510 actve/standby and create one site to site VPN with remote peer ip address xx.xx.xx.xx, Our VPN traffic running on 6 mb internet link for video conferancing traffic.Now client give another link 2 mb internet and client told to us our data traffic runnig on 2 mb link but this data traffic running on the same remote peer IP xx.xx.xx.xx.
Secondly request also they need failover over the ISP link.
how we immplement the same on ASA 5510.
It's been a long time since I played in Cisco CLI.Using a Cisco 506 Firewall 6.3(4) PDM 1.0?Problem is I created a site to site tunnnel with a vendor and since then our remote VPN does not work. Completely times out so I am sure I broke something in the crypto map or something similar.
Tunnel is policy 10 using access-list 101
Remote VPN is Policy 20
Config Below:
: Saved:PIX Version 6.3(4)interface ethernet0 10fullinterface ethernet1 10fullnameif ethernet0 outside security0nameif ethernet1 inside security100enable password XLk0qAaMaA6kjvA6 encryptedpasswd VeCrsQbWdIFPwnny encryptedhostname RMS-DR-PIXdomain-name RMS.Localfixup protocol dns maximum-length 512fixup protocol ftp 21fixup protocol h323 h225 1720fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719fixup protocol http 80fixup protocol rsh 514fixup protocol rtsp 554fixup protocol sip 5060fixup protocol sip udp 5060fixup protocol skinny 2000fixup protocol smtp 25fixup protocol sqlnet 1521fixup protocol tftp 69namesobject-group network FTP_Clients description FTP Client PCs network-object host 192.168.xxx.xxx network-object host
[code]....
I have a cisco ASA 5510 at the branch here. It terminates about 8 vpn tunnels and also it supports remote access clients. I just have a quick question. Can my remote sub-net group access the other remote access site-site VPN subnet group. If yes then how should i configure it.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am attempting to configure Radius authentication accross a site-to-site VPN for my ASA 5510-01 for remote access.
ASA5510-1 currently has a live site to site to ASA5510-2.
ASA 5510-1 - 10.192.0.253
ASA 5510-2 - 172.16.102.1
DC - 172.16.102.10
ASA5510-01 can ping the DC and vica versa but is unable to authticate when i perform a test. ASA5510-01 can authenticate to a DC on it;s own LAN but not on the remote LAN that DC sits on.
I have double checked the 'Server Secret Key' and ports as well as various users which all work locallly. ASA5510-02 authenticates to DC with no problems.
At the main site, I have 3 5508 WLCs each part of a mobility group (wlcMain-MG). In NCS, under "System/Mobility Groups" for each controller, I see each controller listed as "local" with the other Controllers listed with the group name "wlcMain-MG". None of the SSIDs are "anchored".
I have a new site with a 2500 series WLC that I would like to push out 2 SSIDs. This site contains two customers. One customer is the Main customer with the second customer leasing space.
I have the Cust2 WLAN at the remote site set to have traffic egress out of a local interface on the 2500 WLC (this traffic is then tunnelled back to their Main location via an ASA which houses the DHCP scope for that vlan). I can connect to this SSID, obtain an IP Address off the ASA and am tunnelling without issue.
For the Cust1 WLAN at the remote site, I would like to broadcast an SSID from the Main location on those same APs which are registered to the 2500. It is my understanding, that I anchor the SSID at the Main site and identically configure the SSID at the remote site. This will allow the end user to authenticate to the RADIUS server at the Main site and be placed upon the correct vlan (we are using DOT1x and dynamic vlans).
For my test, I am starting simple. I have created a test WLAN with no authentication. At the main site, on 5508 WLC3, I have created the test WLAN, and placed the interface into a low security vlan (call it VLAN-low). I have anchored this test WLAN to that controller. At the remote site, I have created the same WLAN (but placed it into the management interface for now - the VLAN-low does not exist at the remote site) and configured that WLAN to anchor back to the WLC3 at the main site. I am unable to obtain an IP address from the remote site. I have placed the remote site WLC in the wlcMain-MG as well. How close does the code need to be on the controllers - the 5508s are at 7.0.116.0 and the 2500 is at 7.0.220.0? What could I be missing?
Have asa 5520 ver 8.0(4) I have vpn client access created and working I have l2l vpn created and working with another set of asa The issue at hand VPN client from internet connects and authenticates, this client can access Site A's networks with no problems. However vpn client on Site A ASA can not access Networks through l2l tunnel located at Site B.
View 2 Replies View RelatedAny step by step guide to setup syslog for site to site VPN.(in ASA 5520)Just send me the step to monitor site to site vpn using that in ASA 5520.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm having slow performance thru a Site to Site VPN. I have an ASA 5520 in each site with the version 8.2(4) in both ASA's. I have a 20Mb internet service in one side and in the other side I have 50Mb. When I transfer a file from the Sita A to Site B I get a transfer rate of 130KB/S.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI recently faced an issue at work. Clients want to make ipsec site-to-site vpn redundant. I have 2-asa-5520 working in a stack. Is it possible to configure site-to-site vpn in a redundant mode, like first peer ip address is x.x.x.x and secondary is y.y.y.y (backup) ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am building a site to site VPN from our headquarters to a customer. I am using an ASA 5520. The customer is using Cisco 3945 routers. The customer has two VPN termination points. The customer requests that we make one of their termination points the primary VPN connection and make the other termination point the backup in the event that the primary VPN fails. How do I configure this on the ASA? Does the below configuration fulfill this goal?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am having an issue with establishing L2L VPN with remote site. My side is cisco asa 5520 and other side is check point UTM-- tunnel is not up.just wnated to confirm on my sidde if the configuration is OK.al the parameters using are correct for both side. any issue with below conf ? default route is pointing to my next GW address is there additiona default is required for VPN ? to reach the remote LAN somthing like pointing to remote peer address.to give a brief idea front end device is router as GW wher in internet is terminated and other wan connections ASA is behind ther GW rtr and outside int of asa and lan interface of GW rtr is having public ip. LAN switch is connected to ASA
access-list insideinterface_nat0_outbound extended permit ip 192.168.36.0 255.255.255.0 10.34.12.0 255.255.254.0
access-list outsideinterface_cryptomap_40 extended permit ip 192.168.36.0 255.255.255.0 10.34.12.0 255.255.254.0
nat (insideinterface) 0 access-list insideinterface_nat0_outbound
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
[code]....
I have a remote office that currently connects back to a Central data center via Site to Site VPN. I am bringing up a 2nd internet connection as a fall back in the Remote Office. How do I configure the Site to Site VPN to work correctly so that if the primary internet connection goes down, the site fails over to the secondary? On Remote the internet connections are from different providers so they have completely different blocks of public IPs.
Central
ASA 5520 8.0(4)
Gig 0/0 Public IP
Remote
ASA 5520 8.4(1)
Gig 0/0 Public IP
Gig 0/3 Public IP (2nd internet)
We have 2 5520 ASA's working in an active/standby function at our central site. The remote agencies have control of their ASA's or other devices able to create VPN tunnels back to the central site. When a new remote agency wants to connect to our central site we assign them a network range that is routable on the central sites network.We ask that the remote agency NAT into the addresses we provided them.This way we are able to route back to them. We assign the interesting traffic and then they we start communicating by way of the tunnel.
Since the central site can't control the traffic coming in on the site to site tunnel other than just defining the interesting traffic AND we aren't able to control the NAT on the remote end how can I put an access list on the central site ASA to allow only certain ports and IP's by way of access list? Ultimately, I'm trying to limit traffic on the central site coming inbound to only allow traffic I want. I tried applying a group policy to the lan2lan site to site tunnel, but it failed for some reason. It actually prevented all traffic. Can I apply a group policy to a site-to-site tunnel?
I'm struggling here a bit as I don't have control of the remote end. They can NAT whatever they want to an address in the range we assigned them. The tunnels interesting traffic is set to full ip to the central site's destination. The interesting traffic on the central site is set the same. However, on the central side...I want to limit that traffic to only certain ports by way of an acl. If it is possible to assign a site-to-site tunnel a group policy and filtering is done in that method, can
I have a site-to-site VPN configured between a 5520 at our data center, and a 1700 at a client's site for site-to-site connectivity. What I've noticed is, is that the VPN can only initiate from my Data Center, never from the client router. I can telnet into the router and start a telnet session sourced from the "inside" interface and it fails, yet I can see the NAT translations get created in the state table that should match the crypto-map. However, if I ping a host on the inside of the remote LAN from my workstation (behind the 5520) to bring the tunnel up, and run the exact same command on the client router once the tunnel is up, it works. Right now I have a continuous ping running from my workstation to keep the tunnel up, but obviously that's not the best solution
I had to modify this config to NAT the LAN addresses at the client to a non-overlapping subnet, so anything coming from 128.1.0.0/16 should be NAT'd to 192.168.105.[50-200]/24. I've also got two static NATs for inbound access from the data center and those seem to work fine.
Current configuration : 2787 bytes
!
! No configuration change since last restart
!
version 12.3
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
[code]...
We have successfully establish a site-to-site vpn, but we have some difficulties when PPTP users try to access the remote network linked by this tunnel. LAN users can access the remote network without problem, but users who are connected remotly to the lan (PPTP) can't access computer on the remote network. Is there a way to allow PPTP user to access the remote network ? Adding a route ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a site-to-site VPN already established, everything is working as it should. I'm trying to block the remote network from accessing our network since we only need to access theirs. I'm sure this is something very easy to implement with an ACL but I'm not sure where this rule needs to go. The VPN is on ASA 5505.
View 5 Replies View RelatedA user with Easy VPN client connects to a 876 ISR (router A). This router also has a site-to-site VPN to another 876 ISR (router B). What I want to achieve is that the user dials in to router A and can access the network on the remote end of the site-to-site tunnel (router B) In diagram:
user (192.168.18.x) - Easy VPN - Router A (192.168.16.x) - sitetosite - Router B (192.168.17.x)
I have added routes in router B to the 192.168.18.x network with router A as next hop, but I can't reach the other segment.
I'm attempting to configure an for both site-to-site and remote access VPNs. The site-to-site is working fine, however when I connect using the Cisco client, after initial connection and password prompt I get a "not connected" status. The log states that a policy map match could not be found. I have successfully set the unit up for remote access with no site-to-site and ran into another host of issues when adding the site-to-site to the working remote access config, so I started over setting up site-to-site first. I've attempted this through ADSM (hate it) - the current configuration is via CLI. I'm certain I'm just missing a piece or two.
View 2 Replies View Related