Cisco VPN :: ASA Version 8.2(5) - Public-to-Public L2L / No Return Traffic?
Apr 2, 2013
One of our vendors requires using a public ip address to setup a site-to-site IPSEC vpn. We only have one public ip address and that will be used for the vpn endpoint and for internet access for the local network. I've setup policy NAT from our local network to the outside interface. I'm also using the outside ip address for the crypto map. The tunnel setups successfully and the Tx count increases anytime I try to ping the remote network, but the ping fails and the Rx count does not increase. According to our vendor, we should be able to ping the remote network and connect using port 443. When trying to connect using port 443, I see a SYN timeout in the logs. I'm not sure if the problem is on their end and they're rejecting our traffic, or if something is misconfigured on our end. I'd like to make sure that I have everything configured correctly before I go and point fingers at them.
Local Network - 10.10.9.0/24
Remote Network - 20.20.41.0/24
Remote Peer - 20.20.60.193
.ASA Version 8.2(5)
!
hostname ciscoasa
[code]....
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 1, 2013
I have a requirement to nat two public ip addresses to same interanl ip address. Is this possible on ASA version 9.1?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 10, 2011
i have an ASA 5520 8.4(1) setup as follows
public wan
|
|
ASA-- public dmz
|
|
private lan
i need to allow https traffic to a server in the DMZ that will have a routable IP address will just an ACL suffice ?which interface do i apply it to ? wan or dmz ?i dont need a NAT since the DMZ is a routable space?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 8, 2011
Upgrading from a PIX 515 ,V6.2, I can get internet traffic out through the ASA , but no traffic in to the servers. The NATS are the same on the old firewall. The routers outside the firewalls are doing further natting from the .253 netwrok to a publilc address. No changes have taken place on the routers. [code]
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2013
Im having problems with google saying we generate to much traffic to [URL]
I need to know which machines on the inside are talking so much with google. Can this be done via ASA 5510? do i need a third party program for this?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 23, 2011
We have a 2911 Router running 15.0(1)M4. G 0/0 is our LAN interface, and it has three subinterfacesG0/0.1 is our data LAN, and the gateway for our Windows machines. This is the interface this question concerns.G0/0.23 is a separate LAN for various equipmentG0/0.192 is another LAN for equipmentG 0/1 is connected to the internet, and has a public address.S 0/0/0 is a T1 PPP, connected to our core data centerS 0/1/0 is a backup T1 PPP, again, connected to our core data center.There are three static routes entered:ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.12.1.1 100 This is the first PPPip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.13.1.1 200 This is the secondary PPPip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255 It currently has a cost of 255 while i figure this one out. xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx represents the cable company gateway, which I can ping properly. I've also used "gigabitethernet 0/1" in place of the next hop ip with the same results. The public interface is properly connected, and can ping it's next hop (the cable company gateway). When I change the static route for gigabitethernet 0/1 to a cost of "0", the router can properly ping DNS names, such as google.com through the public interface.
However, devices on the data LAN cannot reach any public addresses except for the router's public interface, let alone DNS names (I am using 8.8.8.8 as my test IP). If I revert the cost back to 255, making the PPP the gateway of last resort, these devices can again connect. (they travel through the PPP to our Data center's internet)
This confuses me. If our server, on the same LAN as the router can ping the public interface (it's definitley not leaving the 2911, as latency is less than 1ms), and the router itself can ping outside addresses, what is preventing the router's public interface from passing traffic to the internet from any source other than itself? I have attached our running config in the hopes that there is something obvious I'm missing (the public ip addresses have been changed so they are not exposed). I simply want clients on our 10.23.0.0 LAN to get to the internet via the public interface of the local router, and still connect to corporate resources using the PPP links. MAS_2911#sho run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5666 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 01:47:50 eastern Sat Sep 24 2011 by redacted
[Code].....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 6, 2012
On remote site I have Cisco ASA5505, on cental site I have Cisco 2811 router, working site-to-site VPN tunnel. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2012
I am working on a task of redirecting any unmatched http traffic to Symantec public transparent proxy through Cisco ASA. For the definition of uncatched http traffic, we have inbound squid servers for deploying IE proxy pac and redirect the http traffic to Symantec public transpraent proxy, however we can't deploy IE proxy pac to mobile device and non-support web browers.Since we have some application using IE proxy setting for direct http communication with external domains, the current symantec policy addes those domains in the exception list so that they are not redirect to Symantec public transparent proxy server.
-For the platform - Cisco ASA 5510 ASA 8.4(4)1
-For the solution, I have the following two nat rules
View 10 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2011
I have a problem with the return path of NAT'd traffic on a Cisco 877W router. Here's the network setup:
gatekeeper1 (192.168.0.1) is a Cisco 857gatekeeper2 (192.168.0.253) is a Cisco 857gatekeeper3 (192.168.0.251) is a Cisco 877W
The default route is 192.168.0.1 on all devices, however there are some static route defined so that traffic to certain IP addresses bounce off to 192.168.0.253 and use that Internet connection instead. This new connection is designed so that traffic aimed for a certain internal IP address (192.168.0.190) comes via this third internet connection in order to take the load off of the main line. NAT is all configured and appears to be working when .251 is the default route but as soon as I set it back to .1, the traffic appears to come in but doesn't go out again.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 26, 2012
I've configured an ASA5505 to be Lan to Lan VPN tunnel endpoint, peering with a linux box. The ASA is full licensed so that side isn't an issue.PROBLEM:When the tunnel is initialised from the linux box everything comes up okay except the ASA isn't encapsulation any packets. It is decrypted the packets received from the Linux box okay but no return traffic is being encrypted.When the tunnel is initialised from the ASA, nothing happens.After some troubleshooting I've found that the ACL defining interesting traffic nor the ACL defining NO_NAT aren't being hit at all.
ACL for NO_NAT:
access-list NO_NAT line 1 remark ACL USED TO DEFINE WHAT TRAFFIC NOT TO NAT OVER THE VPN
access-list NO_NAT line 2 extended permit ip host PAMS_SERVER object-group LINUX-BOXES 0xc736d5fb
access-list NO_NAT line 2 extended permit ip host PAMS_SERVER 10.11.228.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt=0)
[code]....
I've checked with the administrator of the linux box and the definition for interesting traffic is exactly the same (except in reverse as should be the case).The firewall is doing other things like NATs and such like too but those NATs have nothing to do with this VPN. The setup is a LAN to LAN connection with no natting in between.The main parts of the config are attached, i've deleted things that should have a bearing on this however if you think it necessary i can sanitise the config and re-post. I think it will be working fine as long as the traffic hits those ACLs, however they're not and I'm unsure why.At this time i'm not seeing anything at all when doing an debug cry ipsec or debug cry isa. The ACL's aren't being hit so i'm guessing it's not even trying to form the VPN as it can't see any traffic that constitutes being 'interesting'.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2012
I've just bought a ASA 5505 to project my LAN. I've already use Cisco router in the past but it's the first time with ASA line.Everythings work except one major point, the return traffic is blocked by the system… I don't really understand how the zone based firewall is supposed to work but it seems OK by default, my LAN side is allowed to talk with the Internet but Internet is not allowed to directly call my LAN. The NAT is setup to use the IP of my outside interface.When I try to ping a public server, the ASA debug log show me that the communication can go out the network, with the good translation, then go back to the ASA from the public server and here, the ASA block it because the communication is not allowed.I've only found two workaround:
-allow inside trafic with static rules, and I say NO ;
-disable the zone based feature by settings all zone to the 0 level…
How I'm supposed to make my state-full firewall work with zone based feature?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 5, 2012
On a 2821 Router with 15.1(3)T1
I have an IPSec VPN and NAT configured. Return traffic from an internal NAT host seems to be blocked by the WAN inbound ACL. What is the proper way to allow return traffic from the Internet for this internat NAT host? Note: As a test, removing the deny entry on the WAN ACL allows return traffic.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2012
On a Catalyst 6500, we configured a SPAN session with VLAN 300 as a source. We configured the session bi-directional ("both" keyword). We connect a sniffer on the SPAN destination port.
Strangely enough, we only see the traffic from the VRF to the firewall, but not the reverse traffic ! What can be the problem ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 12, 2012
I am having touble with a NAT concept. What I have is a 3rd party software VPN product that basically tunnels encapsulated traffic to/from a server sitting inside the network. Right now this traffic utiluizes a physical interface on the ASA5510, but I need the interface for another project.
What I have is this:
Internet<----->ASA<-->router<-->4507(layer3)
| |
| |-Vlan1
[Code]......
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2012
We have a T1 connection at our office with a block of 5 IPs. The external interface is simply one RJ45 jack. Currently we have a home spec router connected to the external interface, and then a switch connected to the router. Certain ports are forwarded to our server in the home spec router for things like OWA, etc.I would like to start putting our other IPs to use. Is this usually done by having a switch connected to the external device and then have multiple routers connected to the switch? Or is it one router capable of VLAN or is it something entirely differentReally, what I want to know is what the rest of the industry typically does to use their multiple IPs.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2011
I'm trying to setup my DMZ so all my servers will have public IPs assigned to them. I'm currently trying to use two interfaces on each server, one with a private IP and then one with a public IP. All my internal traffic will go over the private interfaces...this is working. However, I'm having a problem trying to get it so the public interfaces work. Ultimately, these will be VM Hosts and have VM guests on them, each guest will have it's own public IP.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2012
I am trying to configure a SSL VPN on a Cisco ASA5520. Unfortunately the port 443 of the OUTSIDE interface of ASA is already in use by Microsoft Outlook Web Access and I cannot change the configuration of Outlook. This configuration already in place prevents me to use the public IP of the ASA as Cisco VPN ip address for the webpage. I don't either want to use a different port so to keep life easy for the users.I have some public IPs available that I can use so I wanted to use one of them instead of the ASA's OUTSIDE interface.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2013
My ASA 5510 is configured with a single PUBLICIP1 on the outside interface. All internal hosts 192.168.0.x are behind the ASA firewall and NATed to PUBLICIP1 including a few site-to-site VPN tunnels. This is also true for DMZ. Now, I would like to add a second PUBLICIP2 to the ASA and map it to one internal host ONLY - For eg: 192.168.0.25. How can I do this without effecting the existing setup? Since my entire internal subnet 192.168.0.0/24 is NATed to an existing PUBLICIP1 how can I exclude just one host (192.168.0.25) and bond it to the PUBLICIP2 for all ports.
This is what my current OUTSIDE interface looks like.
interface Ethernet0/0
duplex full
nameif OUTSIDE
security-level 0
ip address PUBLICIP1 255.255.255.224
!
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 4, 2011
how can i make my PC as public IP? do i need to wrt som servlet program 4 it?and how to mak my mobile as public IP by setting its domain?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2012
How to Configure VPN SERVER with Public IP. Is there any free and secure tool so that we can create multiple vpn client and access the vpn network, Requirement Only one public Ip.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 5, 2012
Recently I added a second web-server to my network. I have 2 static public ip's from my isp. My setup will be:
isp(two static ip's)---->Verizon MI424WR Router--->server 1 and server 2.
I currently have server 1 with IP: 192.168.1.100 and server 2 with IP: 192.168.1.101
If I have the two static public ip's xxx.xxx.xxx.27 and xxx.xxx.xxx.28. How do I forward xxx.xxx.xxx.27 to 192.168.1.100 and xxx.xxx.xxx.28 to 192.168.1.101
I read somewhere where i have to set the iptables on the router to do it. Do I have to buy a special firewall/router to do this or can mine do the trick.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 4, 2013
I cannot access Internal network to DMZ with public ip but i can access public servers in DMZ with External network.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 29, 2012
I will be provided with /29 public IP address from my ISP. The idea is to run OSPF between ISP and my ASAs over private IPs so /29 is presented to ASA. This is because I will be using 5 out 6 available IPs on my ASA so I cannot use them on the routers.I need to run HA in Active/Standby mode on ASA, terminate site-to-site and remote access VPNs on ASA, and use static NAT for kit in DMZ network I am trying to figure out how to present this public IP range on ASA. Should I create two subinterfaces on physical interface towards OSPF area and assigned private IP address on one of them for OSPF and public IP on another and then setup a failover on each subinterface.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 11, 2012
command for port forwarding to a few applications (inside hosts) when you only have one Static IP (Public) which is used for many to one NAT (Overloading)?This is the config for the many to one NAT.access-list 1 permit 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer1 overload What command is necessary to forward ports to certain applications?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 25, 2011
Is it possible to use 1 private IP through VPN and same private IP mapped with Public IP? For example 192.168.0.1 is configured in VPN tunnel. i m able to ssh on both ends. ( VPN phase 1 and phase 2 gets completed)But when i map 192.168.0.1 with some public IP problem starts. when i try ssh i see public IP in my destination firewall logs. IPSEC: Received an ESP packet xx.xx.xx.xx "mapped public IP". The decapsulated inner packet doesn't match the negotiated policy in the SA, The packet specifies its destination as
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2012
I've currently got my ASA (5505) serving a /28 public subnet. I've ran out of IPs, so my DC has issued me an additional /24 subnet that they have routed to my ASA. What needs to be done on my ASA so be able to use these new addresses? I've been trying to search and not been able to find a good answer (some say I shouldn't have to do anything, everything else references NATing, which I currently don't do and would rather not do).The servers I assign these to, I'd like them to have the public ip assigned directly to them.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2013
is it possible that a public IP can be automatically routed to another public ip.For example I have two routers A and B. router B has a LanB in 10.0.0.0 network and the public ips are in the x.x.x.0 for internet access. router A is located at a remote location and has a public ip of y.y.y.0 network.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2012
I have setup Cisco Asa 8.4 Lab in GNS3 to understand new Nat changes in asa 8.4 because im new to asa.
I have configured one of my internal webserver to static NAT with one public ip. Im able to access hosted webpage from static public ip 192.168.1.4 means NAT is working fine, the problem here Im facing i'm not able to ping to Mapped public IP 192.168.1.4 from outside interface sitting on pc (ip 192.168.1.100) which is also connected to same outside network and neither from ASA console but Im able to ping outside interface ip address which is 192.168.1.3 from pc (192.168.1.100) and from asa console.
This how my network topology
Inside Network 192.168.72.0/24 outside Network 192.168.1.0
inside ip 192.168.72.2/24---------------ASA8.4-----------------------outside ip 192.168.1.3/24 (connected to ADSL router 192.168.1.1)
[Code]......
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 20, 2012
I've replaced my dead ASA5505 with a 861-K9.Our ISP provides a subnet of public address /29 (wan side) by example: 200.200.200.xxx /29,we have 3 servers (lan side) in the example 10.1.1.xxx /24 is the same case than Johnatan, the only difference are the public addresses. [URL], everything is ok when NAT via the FE4 public address, but when do the same with other public IPs doesn't work.
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2011
I have a Cisco 877 at home and need to find out what it's public IP was yesterday. I turn it off at night and usually I get the same public IP based on my ISP's lease, but can't be sure, anyway I can check this?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2011
1. how do I nat a public address to a dmz address.
2. how do I open port 80/443 in the public to this address?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2011
For a branch office we have an ASA5505 connected to the ISP with an DHCP provided public IP "locked" to the local MAC This works ok!Now - the ISP may provide up to 5 public IP's (all DHCP assigned).Is it possible to configure 2-5 public interfaces in the ASA?? As IP's are DHCP assigned there must be something (a interface) to request the address.Would this be possible, and if so - what license would be required??NAT routing on the inside should be possible as well.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2011
I have a ASA5505 that I need to allow IPSEC and SSL VPNs through. The ASA is connecting to a BT Business ADSL router, what address should I be using on the ASA outside interface that will allow the ASA to be reachable from the Internet?
View 1 Replies
View Related
