Upgrading from a PIX 515 ,V6.2, I can get internet traffic out through the ASA , but no traffic in to the servers. The NATS are the same on the old firewall. The routers outside the firewalls are doing further natting from the .253 netwrok to a publilc address. No changes have taken place on the routers. [code]
View 3 RepliesNew to the ASA 5505 8.4 software version, but here is what I'm trying to do:
-Single static public IP: 16.2.3.4
-Need to PAT several ports to three separate servers behind firewall
-One server houses email, pptp server, ftp server and web services: 10.1.20.91
-One server houses drac management (port 445): 10.1.20.92
-One server is the IP phone server using a range of ports: 10.1.20.156
Basically, need to PAT the ports associated with each server to the respective servers behind the ASA 5505. Is anything missing from this config? Do I need to include a global policy for PPTP and SMTP? [code]
I have a situation where we have a single DMZ server currently statically forwarded to a single public IP. TCP ports 80, 443, 8080, 8500, 53, and 21 are open to this server via an access list.
However, we have added an additional server to the DMZ, and because our web developers did not communicate with me beforehand, we are forced to use the same DNS name (thus, the same piblic IP) for this server. This server only needs traffic on TCP/8800 forwarded to it.
I am using ASDM 6.4 for configuration of this, as I am required to take multiple screen shots of the procedure for our change control policy.
My question lies in the reconfiguration of NAT/ PAT. Since our current server has a single static NAT to a single public IP, it is simply natted for "any" port. I understand that I can add the new server as an object, and only PAT it on TCP 8800, but will I then have to go back and reconfigure the first server multiple times for PAT, or will the ASA notice the specific PAT, and forward 8800 to the new server without affecting the existing "old" server?
It appears ASDM will not allow me to put multiple ports into a single network object. I am assuming I will need to add 6 separate object translations for the "old" server based on TCP port, and 1 object translation for the "new" server, correct?
I've tried a bunch things but it didn't work, I'm about to gave up! :-/
I have the following scenario:
ASA5510 - v8.3(2)
Interfaces
ETH0/0 = outside = 189.xxx.xxx.129
ETH0/1 = inside = 10.xx.1.15
[Code]....
What should I do to get the SIP and 8080 port working on my Public IP, likewise just as access from my browse the http://189.xxx.xxx.129:8080 and get through directly to my internal server 10.xx.xx.61 ?
I have a Cisco ASA 5510 that was set up as a VPN server for working remote. I have disabled split tunneling so that all traffic created while VPN'd in goes through the ASA. The problem I'm having I believe would be resolved if I enabled split tunneling but I would prefer another solution. Now..for the problem.When a user is connected via VPN, they can hit all intended devices both public and private accept servers that have static NATs in the FW. So Server A has a public of 1.1.1.1 which is one to one mapped to private address of 10.1.1.1. Now if the remote user brings up a browser and goes to 1.1.1.1 it wont work. The FW gives me a error which is posted below. However, using the private IP of the server works. I thought about trying to manipulate DNS to resolve this as the remote users are using URLs and not IPs when trying to reach these servers but again, was hoping I could resolve the NAT problem that the FW seems to be having.
Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forward and reverse flows; Connection for tcp src Outside:192.168.202.100/49238 dst INSIDE:1.1.1.1/80 denied due to NAT reverse path failure 192.168.202.x/24 is the remote vpn ip given via the ASA.
Here are some configurations on the ASA:
static (INSIDE,Outside) 1.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255
access-list INSIDE_nat0_outbound extended permit ip object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_2 192.168.202.0 255.255.255.0
object-group network DM_INLINE_NETWORK_2
[code].....
Outside with 4.4.4.4 as the public ip traffic gets NAT'd do dynamically Inside with 10.1.1.x network on it.The ASA is running 8.2
Got an ASA5525-X with 8.6 release. We have an inside interface (10.11.1.0/24) and a DMZ interface (10.254.1.0/24). On that DMZ interface theres an SMTP server; by using the Public server feature in ASDM we created a rule so we have mapped the 10.254.1.29 internal ip to an external ip 217.x.x.x Everything is fine; working ok, but for several reasons we need to access the public ip 217.x.x.x from an inside ip (10.11.1.10). I tried to do it by creating an exemption for the dynamic nat; if i don't do that i have a 'deny ip spoof from...' message rolling on my syslogs.Seems to do the trick.....but only for pings! i ping the public ip from the inside ip, and got the reply from the internal ip on the DMZ. But if i want to telnet port 25 from inside to public; its not working.
View 7 Replies View RelatedIm having problems with google saying we generate to much traffic to [URL]
I need to know which machines on the inside are talking so much with google. Can this be done via ASA 5510? do i need a third party program for this?
We can´t reach DMZ servers from other DMZ servers?If I make a ping from DMZ server to another, sometimes only recieve one ping, sometimes 4, sometimes 0.How can I allow the traffic between DMZ servers??
(ASA 5520 Version 8.4)
Recently moved into the hardware firewall space and have a ASA 5510. Having some issues trying to get traffic through the box to my 4 dedicated servers. all the servers have static IP's and are connected to a private switch into one of the ethernet ports on the firewall(0/2). Public internet connection into another(0/0). 1 of my servers has a connection to the management port, and the public switch, and this is the one im trying to do the configuration on.
Im unsure what to set the IP address of my "outside" interface as. need to have RDP,FTP, HTTP traffic going to each of the 4 servers independently, pretty sure i can get the rules in place to allow this, but cant seem to get any traffic to go through the firewall to any of the other 3 servers.
One of our vendors requires using a public ip address to setup a site-to-site IPSEC vpn. We only have one public ip address and that will be used for the vpn endpoint and for internet access for the local network. I've setup policy NAT from our local network to the outside interface. I'm also using the outside ip address for the crypto map. The tunnel setups successfully and the Tx count increases anytime I try to ping the remote network, but the ping fails and the Rx count does not increase. According to our vendor, we should be able to ping the remote network and connect using port 443. When trying to connect using port 443, I see a SYN timeout in the logs. I'm not sure if the problem is on their end and they're rejecting our traffic, or if something is misconfigured on our end. I'd like to make sure that I have everything configured correctly before I go and point fingers at them.
Local Network - 10.10.9.0/24
Remote Network - 20.20.41.0/24
Remote Peer - 20.20.60.193
.ASA Version 8.2(5)
!
hostname ciscoasa
[code]....
I am working on a task of redirecting any unmatched http traffic to Symantec public transparent proxy through Cisco ASA. For the definition of uncatched http traffic, we have inbound squid servers for deploying IE proxy pac and redirect the http traffic to Symantec public transpraent proxy, however we can't deploy IE proxy pac to mobile device and non-support web browers.Since we have some application using IE proxy setting for direct http communication with external domains, the current symantec policy addes those domains in the exception list so that they are not redirect to Symantec public transparent proxy server.
-For the platform - Cisco ASA 5510 ASA 8.4(4)1
-For the solution, I have the following two nat rules
I have a cisco ASA5505, it runs a wide site to site VPN network and has 4 servers connected to it
10.50.15.4 > fileserver
10.50.15.5 > domain controller (exchange)
10.50.15.6 > terminal server
10.50.15.7 > terminal server
Now yesterday i removed 10.50.15.6 and replaced it with a new terminal server with the same ip address, ever since the ASA is blocking traffic between it and the domain controller (example)
2Oct 27 201214:51:0510600710.50.15.655978DNSDeny inbound UDP from 10.50.15.6/55978 to 10.50.15.5/53 due to DNS Query What has me baffled is the only thing different between today and yesterday is the new server is windows server 2008 and the old one was windows server 2003. The new server has the same LAN ip address as the old one to make the changeover seamless for the users.
why all the sudden my ASA has decided to block the traffic between those machines? all the other machines can talk to it fine just not the domain controller, and seeing that this is a terminal server naturally you can see the problem i face!
this router has worked flawlessly for 2 years now without any config changes and i cant work out why its blocking traffic between those 2 machines.
Since the power failure two days ago, my -ASA stops forwarding traffic to internal servers, for no apparent reason. Packet trace shows all OK, packet capture buffer stays empty when I try to http into the mail server. The only way to get it working is to change the Outside Ip to the one used for mail, then to change it back. It will work OK for a few hours, then stop, with nothing obvious in the logs.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a Cisco router 2901 with 10M dedicated link on Gi0/0 interface, 3 VLANs on Gi0/1 interface. The Gi0/1 is subinterfaced for default, LAN and DMZ segments.LAN is assigned 172.16.1.0/24 and DMZ 192.168.1.0/24. We host a web server (192.168.1.11) and dns server (192.168.1.18) on DMZ VLAN. On the same WAN interface we have confiugured PAT and NAT. For outside queries to DNS and WEB servers everything works fine but when we try to open the website on our web server from internal LAN, we can´t do it.
When PINGing the web server by its IP address 192.168.1.11 or by the FQDN, the requests respond fine. The domain.com and [URL] resolve and respond with public IP address of our WAN link as the DNS server is configured. But when we try to open [URL] in the Internet browser the website does not open.
What could be the issue? Can be anything with NAT or PAT configuration?
i have an ASA 5520 8.4(1) setup as follows
public wan
|
|
ASA-- public dmz
|
|
private lan
i need to allow https traffic to a server in the DMZ that will have a routable IP address will just an ACL suffice ?which interface do i apply it to ? wan or dmz ?i dont need a NAT since the DMZ is a routable space?
We are planning to split the Private servers from the DMZ Servers and configure an additional Interface and segment for this purpose.
Private Servers Segment: 192.168.4.0/24 (there is no DHCP all servers' IPs are statically configured)
DMZ Segment: 192.168.3.0/24 (This is a future deployment)
LAN Segment: 172.17.0.0/16
Both, Private Servers and DMZ Servers are in a collocation as well as the ASA5520. There are multiple Branch offices that uses subnets within the 172.17.0.0/16 Network and they are connected to the ASA5520 via Metro-E.
I do not know if this is possible but what I want to do is this:
In order to avoid the change of internal DNS records I want to mask the DMZ servers with a Private Server IP when a Private server or LAN host wants to access it like this:
The FTP server in the DMZ has the IP address: 192.168.3.100. But when a PC from the LAN wants to reach the FTP server it should points to its old IP: 192.168.4.100. This way the PC sends a packet to the ftp.corporate.net (192.168.4.100) the ASA recieves the packet and translate it to the (192.168.3.100) and send it out through the DMZ Interface.
Also if the Private Servers wants to reach the same FTP the ASA will act like a proxy-ARP and send the paquet to the DMZ by means of the translation of the IP.
We have a 2911 Router running 15.0(1)M4. G 0/0 is our LAN interface, and it has three subinterfacesG0/0.1 is our data LAN, and the gateway for our Windows machines. This is the interface this question concerns.G0/0.23 is a separate LAN for various equipmentG0/0.192 is another LAN for equipmentG 0/1 is connected to the internet, and has a public address.S 0/0/0 is a T1 PPP, connected to our core data centerS 0/1/0 is a backup T1 PPP, again, connected to our core data center.There are three static routes entered:ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.12.1.1 100 This is the first PPPip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.13.1.1 200 This is the secondary PPPip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255 It currently has a cost of 255 while i figure this one out. xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx represents the cable company gateway, which I can ping properly. I've also used "gigabitethernet 0/1" in place of the next hop ip with the same results. The public interface is properly connected, and can ping it's next hop (the cable company gateway). When I change the static route for gigabitethernet 0/1 to a cost of "0", the router can properly ping DNS names, such as google.com through the public interface.
However, devices on the data LAN cannot reach any public addresses except for the router's public interface, let alone DNS names (I am using 8.8.8.8 as my test IP). If I revert the cost back to 255, making the PPP the gateway of last resort, these devices can again connect. (they travel through the PPP to our Data center's internet)
This confuses me. If our server, on the same LAN as the router can ping the public interface (it's definitley not leaving the 2911, as latency is less than 1ms), and the router itself can ping outside addresses, what is preventing the router's public interface from passing traffic to the internet from any source other than itself? I have attached our running config in the hopes that there is something obvious I'm missing (the public ip addresses have been changed so they are not exposed). I simply want clients on our 10.23.0.0 LAN to get to the internet via the public interface of the local router, and still connect to corporate resources using the PPP links. MAS_2911#sho run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5666 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 01:47:50 eastern Sat Sep 24 2011 by redacted
[Code].....
On remote site I have Cisco ASA5505, on cental site I have Cisco 2811 router, working site-to-site VPN tunnel. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a setup where two servers are on the same network are plugged into a L3 switch. Off that switch there is a WAN Optimizer device which is inline going to the MPLS cloud. Also off that switch is an ASA firewall which leads to the Internet for the location. When the two servers communicate with each other i would think the traffic would only go through the L3 switch between the two servers. I am seeing traffic between these two servers hitting the WAN optimizer for some reason. I would think being that these two servers are on the same network the traffic between them would stay at Layer 2. routing is enabled on the switch because of other vlans on the network. What would cause the traffic between the two servers to leave the switch and go up to the optimizer? Below is a diagram that shows the basic setup.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI'm looking for a way to configure Cisco ACE4710 loadbalancer to bypass traffic that is initiated from server side to Internet?Are there any way to configure this, so that the loadbalancer will not maintain session for this bypass traffic to maximize throughput?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am attempting to block all FTP traffic on port 21 from the servers in my network, and only allow FTP from one server to go out.
I have created the following ACL
access-list 101 Permit ip any any
access-list 101 Permit 21 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 any
access-list 101 Deny 21 any any
and have applied it to my truck VPN that goes up to my firewall
int Vlanxxx
ip access-group 101 out
But when i test ftp is still allowed by all servers.
We are looking to implement traffic shaping/policing primarily for P2P traffic. As natively the ASA5550 is only capable of p2p inspection if the traffic is tunneled via port 80 is the AIP-SSM the way forward? We have 2 5550s in active/active failover config. As a side note we are also looking to implement an IDS/IPS system so could this module cover all?Is this module going to provide the desired outcome or is there another module/device out there better suited for this? I would prefer to use the ASA5550s as opposed to implementing another product if only that we can make use of the investment we already made on these devices.
View 1 Replies View RelatedFor my Lan, I have created two Vlan; Vlan 10 = for Users and Vlan 20 = For Database Servers,There are 15 Lan computer/laptop and 5 SQL database server (Dell Server) connected through same 24 port cisco 2960 switch. Means, 15 + 5 port occupied.
I have applied access list on cisco switch to restrict communication between vlan 10 and vlan 20.But My main purpose to create two Vlan is not for any kind of communication or restriction. My main Purpose is that Users traffic do not distrub or choke or affect the Database servers. then what will i need to do for that is VLAN Concept is sufficient for my concern OR I will need to buy seperate Cisco Switch to connect 5 database servers OR Else ?
I am testing limit bandwith using my ASA 8.2, i am trying to limit internet access for certains users , i order to save Bandwith for the important things but i can´t get any limitation
My configuration is the following, the acces list is just for my pc in order to test, and the service policy is applied to outside interface (called internet in my case) for incoming traffic
access-list Internet_mpc_1 extended permit ip host 172.16.127.70 any class-map Internet-class-TEST match access-list Internet_mpc_1 policy-map Internet-policy-web class Internet-class-TEST police output 1024000 1500
service-policy Internet-policy-web interface Internet
With show service policy i can´t see any activity on the policy , but if i do a similar configuration for inside interface outgoing traffic i can see packets allowed and dropped
I have an ASA 5520 with the below config
Gi0/0: outside (Internet)
Gi0/1: inside (Internal users)
Gi0/2: DMZ (web servers, ftp, Mail etc..)
I have a SMTP relay deployed on the DMZ for mailing. I have also a mail servers installed in the internal lan,
I want to allow trafic from dmz to reach internal lan, and i want normally also allow stmp relay from dmz to reach Internet.
How can i block trafic from DMZ to reach Internal Lan (instead of smtp) if the to allow trafic from dmz to internet i must put ANY in the policy?
For allowing trafic from DMZ to reach Internet, the policy must be DMZ -----> ANY ----->Services., this policy means DMZ can implicity reach Internal Lan?
I have 2 modules of FWSM in 6500 switch (failover).I need 5 context.When I use in routed mode (like in the picture) , I cannot ping the servers behind the firewall. (I have ping to FW context),In transparent mode, it is not happening.what is the problem with routed mode?
View 1 Replies View Related1. how do I nat a public address to a dmz address.
2. how do I open port 80/443 in the public to this address?
we have hosted voip and would like have our internet as back for their router. We gave them public static ip so they can configure that in their router. How can i configure the ip address in our firewall let say on asa5510 ethernet port 3 so if their router T1 goes out then our internet will work as backup.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am now using ASA 5510 as a firewall device.I have configured 3 interfaces ethernet 0/0,ethernet 0/1,ethernet 0/2 as Wan interface, DMZ interface and Internal Lan interface. Internet is working fine from LAN as well as DMZ.The WAN interface use the Public Point 2 point IP(/30) Provided by the ISP and another pool of Public Ip is also provided by the ISP (/28). Now I want to Map the /28 IP to some servers in DMZ . DMZ servers currently have 192.168.101.0/27 private IP . Now the problem is how to Map the Public IP to those Private IP in DMZ servers.
View 9 Replies View RelatedWe have 2 IP blocks from my ISP. We have been using just one a /30 block with one IP address used on the outside interface of the device. The new block is a /29 range and I would need to use just two of those IP addresses. Here is the situation I am facing.A company we partnered with wants to set up a VPN, they will send us 2 Cisco 861s to put behind our ASA. Is it possible to assign these 861's with public IPs from the block that we are not currently using? (the /29 range)? I know that it might require an upgrade to the Security Plus.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI am having normal network need to add public ip 162.196.212.32 / 29 with port 51241 in ASA firewall
View 8 Replies View RelatedThe client I am doing work for as ASA 5505 at a remote location that is using Cox Communications for the ISP. The ISP assigned 5 static IP addresses, but we only need 1 for this location. However, that is the minimum you get no matter what. The issue is that the subnet mask is a /25 and what they are telling me is that the ASA is grabbing all the IP addresses in that range. They asked if there is anyway to keep the ASA from grabbing those IP addresses. Now, I have never run into this issue before with a provider. The gateway is in the /25 subnet, so going to a /30 isn't an option.
View 5 Replies View Relatedi just got an extra public subnet from our ISP (co hosting center) But I can't figure out how to use them on my ASA.
New:
IP-adresses: 87.1.1.194 - 87.1.1.254
Default gateway: 87.1.1.193
Subnetmask: 255.255.255.192
Old:
IP-adresses: 200.1.1.34 - 200.1.1.46
Default gateway: 200.1.1.33
Subnetmask: 255.255.255.240
Config:
route wan 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 200.1.1.33 1
And statics like:
static (interface,wan) tcp 200.1.1.37 3389 192.168.3.100 3389 netmask 255.255.255.255