Cisco VPN :: ASA5505 - Site-2-Site VPN With Linksys In One End?
Sep 25, 2012
Today i'm running with an ASA 5510 at the HQ and a ASA 5505 at my home address with a site-2-site VPN connection.
I'm only using the 5505 to hold this site-2-site VPN so it's a bit overkill. I would like a router at my home with build in access point, but it needs to support site-2-site vpn with the ASA 5510 at the HQ.
Are you aware of any Linksys routers that can hold this VPN connection, or is it only "real" cisco routers/firewalls where this is possible?
We have a scenario where the Cisco ASA 5505 will be one end of a site-to-site VPN. The same ASA 5505 also allows Client VPN connection. The question is around IP pooling. If I assign a pool of IP's (192.168.1.20 - 192.168.1.30) for Client VPN connections - do I need to be sure that those same IP's are not used on the other side of site-to-site VPN ?
There could be PC's/Servers running 192.168.1.0/24 on the other side of site-to-site VPN. Would this cause an address conflict ?
I have a site-to-site VPN already established, everything is working as it should. I'm trying to block the remote network from accessing our network since we only need to access theirs. I'm sure this is something very easy to implement with an ACL but I'm not sure where this rule needs to go. The VPN is on ASA 5505.
I have 2 ASA5505's connected through a site-to-site using IKEv1 and IKEv2.Recently, I ran through the wizard to configure the AnyConnect software. [code]Now, my site-to-site connection will only come up using IKEv1.Is there a way to have both the Site-to-Site and the AnyConnect VPN connections use IKEv2?
i have one asa 5505 that have classic remote access vpn set-up and now i need to add site-to-site tunnel on top of the existing configuration. Is that possible with asa 5505 and do i need some special IOS bundle for that? May i use vpn wizard for that or do i need to go through cli since remote access vpn is setup using wizard.
we set up a site-to-site-vpn between a 5505 and a 5510 (both asa8.3.1). We configured both sides using the VPN-Wizard in the ASDM. When we try to ping from the network behind the 5505 (192.168.45.0/24) to any host behind the 5510 (192.168.0.0/24) the tunnel gets established but the ping doesn't get trough. After that we tried to connect via RDP to any host behind the 5510 and it worked well (same with ssh, telnet,vnc etc.). Now we want to map a network-share on a 2008-Server behind the 5510 but it's not working. In the ASDM-Log I see some "denied by inside-access in"-messages for the ports 139 and 445. Isn't it right that the whole traffic in the vpn-tunnel bypasses the acl? Even if we open both ports we can't connect to the network-share?
I'm attempting to configure an for both site-to-site and remote access VPNs. The site-to-site is working fine, however when I connect using the Cisco client, after initial connection and password prompt I get a "not connected" status. The log states that a policy map match could not be found. I have successfully set the unit up for remote access with no site-to-site and ran into another host of issues when adding the site-to-site to the working remote access config, so I started over setting up site-to-site first. I've attempted this through ADSM (hate it) - the current configuration is via CLI. I'm certain I'm just missing a piece or two.
I have a client that wants to establisha S2S VPN across the Internet. His Canada site (using an ASA5510) has a traditional fibre Internet service. However, the Chilean side (using an ASA5505) is using a PPoE Internet service. The Chilean IP is dedicated, but the host IP they've received is the same as the default gateway (odd).Anyway, given that it's a PPoE Internet connection with authentication required, is it even possible to establish a S2S VPN. I guess I'm thinking that if the Canada side tries to initiate to the Chilean side without anyone on their end to initiate the traffic first (and therefore authenticate in the process), will this even work?
I've spent 2 days already trying to get 2 ASA 5505's to connect using an IPSec vpn tunnel. I cannot seem to figure out what im doing wrong, im using 192.168.97.0 and 192.168.100.0 as my internal networks that i'm trying to connect over a directly connected link on the outside interfaces with 50.1.1.1 and 50.1.1.2 as the addresses (all /24). I also tried with and currently without NAT enabled. Here are the configs for both ASA's, the vpn config was done by the ASDM, however i have also tried the command line apporach with no success. I have followed various guides to the letter online, starting from an empty config and from factory default. I have also tried the 8.4 IOS. [code]
he IPSec tunnels do not form and I notice the error: 3Aug 09 201105:13:26IP = 39.188.41.188, Error processing payload: Payload ID: 1 Reading up on this it looks like it might be an IKE problem but I'm struggling to find the cause (the new 8.4 commands not useful).
The setup is as follows:-
Head Office PIX515e v6.3(4) LAN IP 10.0.160.254/24
Branch Office ASA5505 v8.4(1) LAN IP 192.168.47.254/24
I have a couple of ASAs 5505 (HQ & Branch) running version 8.2(4). They are configured with a Site-to-Site VPN over a single WAN link: [code]
I want to enable sla monitor on one of the devices in order to know the real status of my unique link because the interfaces sometimes don't go down, so I don't have any real statistic of failures.
All the information is related to dual ISP links failover. Is there any extra-consideration for my single link scenario?I already have a static route route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 1 so I think I have to overwrite it with something like this route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 1 track 1. Is this correct?If so, when I overwrite it, will the S2S VPN go down and will it go up automatically?
I am normally a software developer, however with recent staff changes at my company I am now the sole IT person.We have to sites: A and B, and we need to make a site to site.
I have access only to the Site A, this one contain a ADSL modem/router (D-Link DSL-2640U), and a ASA5505 behind the modem.We have an public fixed IP addresse configured on the modem.All the information that i have to configure the vpn is: Public ip of the site_BThe encryption algorithm 3DES-MD5.Shared secretThe site_B subnetwork to be reached using the vpnAnd i nedd to get this VPN UP, and it must be no nating for pakets going throught the VPN (for maintenance Issus).
The D-link modem is configured to get the Public IP from my ISP, and i set on it a DMZ to the ASA5505 (192.168.1.254).Until now, i folowed the site-to-site assistant using the ASDM. [code]
We have 2 ASA's that connect to a 2811, but for some reason, the 2nd ASA wont connect anymore. Debuging ipsec or isakmp on the 2811 doesn't come up with any messages.
External IP's still correct, and the sites can ping each other.
Only debug on ASA for crypto isakmp comes up with messages (ipsec doesn't give any messages).
ASDM says: Removing peer from peer table failed, no match! Error: Unable to remove PeerTblEntry
I found some info on the above error messages, but those links didn't quite useful.
Below is fromt he debug on the ASA:
Sep 18 22:06:09 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Pitcher: received a key acquire message, spi 0x0Sep 18 22:06:09 [IKEv1]: IP = 64.X.X.X, Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages to be processed when P1 SA is complete.Sep 18 22:06:10 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Pitcher: received a key acquire message, spi 0x0Sep 18 22:06:10 [IKEv1]: IP = 64.X.X.X, Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages to be processed when P1 SA is complete.Sep 18 22:06:13 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Pitcher: received a key acquire message, spi 0x0Sep 18 22:06:13 [IKEv1]: IP = 64.X.X.X, Queuing KEY-ACQUIRE messages to be processed when P1 SA is complete.Sep 18 22:06:16 [IKEv1]: IP = 64.X.X.X, IKE_DECODE RESENDING Message [code]...
I have 2 ASA 5505 firewall, Site 2 Site VPN working between two firewall. I attached visio diagram for my senario. I configured IPsec Remote VPN in ASA-01 firewall, a user able connted to ASA-01 network via modem through remote VPN. As i configured site 2 site VPN between two ASA, Is that possible that through remote VPN a user can able to connect to ASA-02.
I need to setup a site to site VPN. Site A has a 5505 running ASA v7.2(4), this has been in place for a few years and is also used regularly for client remote access. For site B i have a brand new 5505 running ASA 8.4(3).Is the ASA version miss match an issue, or should i upgrade site A to the same version as site B? Assuming they should run the same version, which is the best choice to use? There is a choice of 9.0.2 under latest releases, then 9.1.1 ED, and 9.1.1(4) interim.
We are going to deploy a site to site VPN using two ASA5505. The network I'm going to traverse has a max MTU of 1320. I determined this by experimenting with pings of different sizes. How should I configure MTU on my ASAs?I'm thinking of using these two commands but I don't know if there are any implications to this...
I'd need to set up site-to-site VPN using ASA 5505 and software 8.2.LAN1 is 10.1.0.0/24, LAN2 is 10.2.0.0/24.The particular thing among the others I've ever set up is that I have to show up to LAN1 as 172.16.1.0/24, and not as 10.1.0.0/24.I have 10.1.0.0/24 as NAT extempt rule, in order to make packet travel the ipsec tunnel, but how can I set up a NAT rule in order to modify LAN2 address and show up to LAN1 as 172.16.1.x instead of 10.2.0.x?
I have a site to site VPN. Every few days my site stops transmitting data to the remote site but I do receive data from the remote site. Only way to fix it is to rebuild the tunnel. I dont have any idle time set for the vpn. so not sure why the tunnel keeps going down. I have a ASA 5505 running 7.2 (3) IOS.
i am trying to configure a site to site VPN with one of my remote offices.
I have used the ADSM Wizard to go through the steps, and i have added the necessary access rules. However, when i try and do a packet tracei get the following error (ad-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule. (see screen shot below)
I have to set up a site to site VPN usin an ASA 5505 and Juniper. I have been informed to inject the VPN with a particular IP.
Following are the ASA 5505 detail Internal NAT : 192.168.101.024
Configs to implement this SITE to SITE vpn. access-list limenat extended permit ip 192.168.101.0 255.255.255.0 10.22.53.128 255.255.255.192 access-list limep2p extended permit ip 10.22.153.128 255.255.255.240 10.22.53.128 255.255.255.192 access-list allow-any extended permit ip any any
I have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.
We have ordered a pair of Cisco ASA5520 (ASA5520-BUN-K9).Now there is a requirement to terminate site-to-site VPN from remote site. Do we need VPN plus licence for this and how much it cost?
The scenario where a Site to Site VPN tunnel has been established between Site A and Site B. Lan on Site A can ping Lan on Site B. My problem is a Printer behind Site B needs to be accessed by using the WAN IP address of Site A. Also i could not ping the remote lan or printer from the router.
Below are my configure on the Cisco 877 in site A.
Building configuration... Current configuration : 5425 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 15:09:21 PCTime Fri Jun 15 2012 by admin01 ! version 12.4 no service pad
cisco products and am struggling getting a VPN going between an ASA 5505 and 5510. I have a VPN created (using the VPN wizward on both) and it shows the VPN is up, but I can't ping the remote site (from either side).
I have ASA 5505, i configured site to site vpn between central site and remote site and is working. Now the problem is we use remote site for troubleshooting purpose, so we need to create a tunnel from remote site to central site. I need to configure such a way that remote site can craete a tunnel to central site, but central site not able to create a tunnel, it just respond to remote site.
i have 2 router asa 5505 with base license i wanna make site to site vpn connection and remote site using vpn client to connect first i have hdsl router with 5 public ip i wanna try it by giving 1 public ip to each router and try the vpn but nothing work?
I am trying to create a site to site VPN using a cisco 2901 and Linksys router.I have the VPN configured and connected and I can ping gateway to gateway. However, from the Cisco I can't ping any of the devices beyond the gateway.Example, from the cisco I can ping 192.168.5.254 (gateway IP address) source gig 0/1 and it works great.
However if I ping from the cisco 192.168.5.50 (end user PC) source gig 0/1 it doesn't work.I have created a client VPN and that works perfectly.Below is my config.
I have a new WRVS4400N configured with a site to site VPN to connect to my office. At the office, we're running a Cisco PIX 515E. I have successfully established an IKE preshared key and the tunnel is listed as Up. I can successfully connect through the VPN tunnel into the office network through the tunnel and all seems good. After some period of time, the tunnel apparently goes into a bad state. Access to the office network is no longer available. When looking at the VPN status screen, the Linksys indicates that the tunnel is up. However, I cannot ping any resources on the office lan. If I disconnect and connect the site to site VPN tunnel, it connects and comes back up successfully. It seems like there is some sort of timeout taking place here. I am running the 1.1.03 firmware.
I am trying to set up a Site to Site between two RV042 with static IP at both routers.at the log at site 1 i get: packet from XX.XXX.XX.167:5: initial Main Mode message received on 10.2.32.1:500 but no connection has been authorized with policy=PSK.At site 2 i get: packet from xxx.xxx.xxx.146:500: initial Main Mode message received on 192.168.1.1:500 but no connection has been authorized with policy=PSK.I have tuned off the firewall and added a Port forwarding to the router ip and port 500.Tried with different autentication methods, but get the same message.
