Currently I have a 4510-48g HP3COM switch as a core switch for my 4 VLAN network (which I hope to send back cause it doesn't do what I wanted it to do... PBR, which is what I need to route specific VLAN's to specific interfaces on the sonicwall,.. cause sonicwall dont understand trunk or spanning tree,. meh!) This may not happen so I've dug out an old CISCO 1800 sdsl router that has 1 FE0 port and 8 other ports, FE 1-8.
The first thing I need to do is get everything to talk to each other. So I plugged the switch into it via its configured trunk port, and configured 4 sub interfaces on the router 1800 and all seemed happy as larry and working. The problem I have is I dont seem to be able to create sub interfaces on the other ports!?
Any good 24 port rack mountable Gigabit switch, that is managed. Is a HP ProCurve 1800-24G 24 port gigabit ethe switch J9028B decent ? Will i be happy ? I have currently a Dell 5224, that works, but it's getting old and for the life of me can't find rack ears AT ALL!! and i want it mounted so i can finish my rack installation.
budget is around 250-300$ 24 ports all gigabit and manage able for vlans etc etc.
Can I configure the Port at the ASA 5050 from Mode: access Port to trunk during the FW is running in a production area without console access ?As I know at the 5505 ist should work?
Is there really any reason why you wouldn't use spanning-tree portfast on a trunk port other than a trunk between two switches? We have it enabled on all ports except for the fiber trunk between two non-stacked switches and the trunk ports connected to our Astaro firewall.I'd like to enable it on the ports to the firewall unless that would cause issues.
i have an issue to connect a trunk between cisco switch and extreme switch i have many vlans that i want to cross via a link between cisco 3750 switch and a Extreme Alpine 3800 switch
I have a 3750g connected to a "core" switch stack of 7 other 3750g's via 2 GigE ports in a trunk. This is currently in a switchport mode access port- channel so only the default vlan data is sent over. Now we have a need due to physical location of these switches, to allow vlan20 (DMZ) from this 3750g to the switch stack. I will configure a few ports on the switch stack for vlan20 and they need to be able to talk to the stand alone 3750g.To do this I will change the port channel on both endpoints to
-switchport trunk ecapsulation dot1q
-switchport mode dynamic desirable
also making the appropriate change on the interfaces belonging to this trunk.My question is, now that its a trunk port that carries multiple VLANs, how much is the bandwidth reduced on that 2gbps link?I have a very active VLAN (10) on the stand alone switch, but on the core I'm not going to be assigning VLAN 10 to any ports. So does traffic from VLAN10 even come across the trunk (wasting bandwidth) if no ports on the core side are assigned to it? I really just need vlan 1 and 20 (for now).
What is network port ? I want to configure a trunk port as network port, so that the trunk port becomes the network port for all the VLAN associated to the port.
i have plan to deploy cisco WAP321 on my customer, and after rading the document about WAP321, it said the WAP321 support for VLAN ID feature, but i cant find whether it support for trunk port because i would like to connect the WAP 321 LAN port to the cisco SMB switch SG300/SG200. is the trunk port already enable on the WAP 321 LAN port so i dont need to configured it or not ?
I've been studying my inter-vlan routing , mainly in this case routing on a stick. I noticed through packet tracer that the 2960 switch doesn't allow for the '(config-if)#switchport trunk encapsulation' command, but the L3 3560 switch will.I am very concerened about this since VLANs are a main topic. What perspective will Cisco be seeing this from for the CCNA exam, I test in 12 days. I have embedded a packet tracer screen shot for more information in case I didn't word this right (which happens all the time to everyone it seems like in NW'ing now and then if not alot).
I'm trying to configure a 2940 switch to trunk. I just can't get it to work.On the interface I have added: switchport mode trunk The default is encap for this switch is dot1q, so there is no need, or ability to add/change the encap mode. Also all vlans are being allowed by default. I still can't get any port to trunk. Need to get G0/1 to trunk, have also tried to trunk f0/6 to the switch in my office. Also can't find the command to change the management VLAN. I do not use vlan 1 for management. Can I change the Mang VLAN on this switch?
I have a 5508 controller with multiple SSID’s that are non-broadcasting. My goal is to get a 1142N to work in non-root bridge mode by accessing one of the existing WPA2 SSID’s.
I have a IDF that has a 3750 switch with multiple devices connected to it in 3-4 different vlans. B/C of fiber length restraints, I can’t uplink in a traditional way. So, my thought is I can connect a 1142N in non-root bridge mode and connect it to an existing WPA2 w/AES that’s being broadcasted by our 5508WLC. Connect the 1142 to 3750 and let it act as the trunk port for the devices on the switch.
Running Cisco NAC 4.1.6 OOB on the LAN. For some reason in the middle of the night, the snmp trap mac-notification added command appeared on the trunk uplink port of one of our switches.
I don't know exactly when the command was added but at 2am when the backup of the config was taken, it was there. At around 4:30am, the uplink went off-line. Is there anything within NAC that would push a change like that automatically to a switch. We do have NAC Profiler running on the network also.The problem was in a branch office so I only got the information second hand what was on the switch itself. We moved the uplink to a different port which allowed the switch to show up on the CAM again, however when I viewed it, the uplink port was set to controlled! Does this make any sense?
how long devices will stay in the certified device list if no timer is configured to clear it out?
On the supervisor card of a cisco 6500 series, according to the following link, [URL] it only has 2 uplink ports on the card. Would I be correct in assuming that I only have those to ports that I can configure IP addresses on?
The cisco that is being devlivere is coming with a 48 port switch and 24 port fibre switch. Could I change any of those ports into a router port and configure IP addresses on those?
The supervisor card is a ws-sup-720-3b the 48 port switch is a ws-x6748-ge-tx the 24 port fibre switch is ws-x6724-sfp
I'm fairly new to Cisco products am in the process of developing my network knowledge on a deeper level. I have a 3825 with a HWIC-4ESW and I'm struggling to fully understand how the two "see" each other. I've setup a V LAN with a layer 3 address on the HWIC and added the switch ports to it. This seemed to allow devices connected to the switch ports to talk to the built-in router ports. I thought this was all making sense until i applied an access-list to the router port. It's a simple ACL i'm just using for testing and the only thing it does is blocks telnet from anywhere. I know the ACL is setup properly because if I connect a device directly to the router port i cannot telnet to the port. However, if i connect a device to one of the switch ports, i am able to telnet to the router port successfully.
It seems that I'm missing something with how traffic flows from the switch port to the router ports and how the two "see" each other.
I was looking for a way to connect an AUX port from a 1700 router to a 6500 switch module console port, to see the output of the Switch's on the 1700 router, in case there is a network downtime, I could see what's going on in the switch, what cable should I use ? Also, is there is any kind of documentation for this type of config what have I seen is very few info.
I am trying to configure a trunk between the above two devices. I like to have vlan11 on ASA. Then I like to connect a host to my switch, and have it communicate with other devices in VLAN 11 or other vlans that reside on the ASA. Below is the config that I currently have.
ASA: ciscoasa# show run interface Ethernet0/1 ! interface Ethernet0/1
It looks like pretty basic config, but it does not work. I have 1x 2602i autonomous mode AP, 1x C2960 switch (with inter-vlan routing prefered SDM template) and 1x 1841 router.
I trunk between Switch and Router works smoothly, but it does not work between AP and Switch or AP and Router.
Configuration looks like this:
AP2602i: interface GigabitEthernet0 no ip address duplex full speed 100
I need to configure a pvlan trunk on DELL enclosure with Cisco Blade Switch, to permit pvlan and a normal Vlan.But, when I want to enter "Trunk" on private vlan mode, I can´t, because only has "host" and "prominiscous" mode. [code]
Is it possible to use Port Security mechanism between two switch (3750 or 3560) ports while trunk has been configured? If it's not possible, is there any other way to ensure that no other Switch can be connected other then the one switch which has been configured/placed by a network engineer?
I have 2 Cisco 6509 switches linked together via single Fibre as a trunk.I want to change this to a port channel where I will add another 3 fibre ports to the port channel but what order do I do this to minimise any disruption.
1-Configure PortChannel and add the 3 new ports, this will bring up the Port Channel but what effect will this have on traffic currently going over the single Trunk link? Will spanning tree go mad, how will switches react?
2-Convert existing Trunk link to Portchannel then add in new ports to PortChannel, I guess in doing this there will be a small hit on traffic as it changes to a port channel.
I have got 2 Cisco switches (3560G and a 3560X) connected by a trunk port. see config below:
3560G#sh run int gi0/26 Building configuration... Current configuration : 130 bytes
[Code].....
I can't seem to get VLAN 79 through to the first switch (3560G). Beyond this switch there is a router with acts as default-gateway for the respective VLANs. For VLAN 79 it is 192.168.79.1. I can ping this from the first switch but can't ping it from the second (3560X) switch but can ping 192.168.25.1 which also is the default gateway for this switch.
I'm using a 2504 controller. I dont have WCS.My questions are about the best way to configure a Rogue Detector AP.
In my lab environment I setup the WLC with 2 APs. One AP was in local mode, and I put the other in Rogue Detector mode.The Rogue Detector AP was connected to a trunk port on my switch. But the AP needed to get its IP address from the DHCP server running on the WLC. So I set the native vlan of the trunk port to be the vlan on which the WLC management interface resides. If the trunk port was not configured with a native vlan, the AP couldn't get an address through DHCP, nor could the AP communicate with the WLC. This makes sense because untagged traffic on the trunk port will be delivered to the native vlan. So I take it that the AP doesn't know how to tag frames.Everything looked like it was working ok.
So I connected an autonomous AP (to be used as the rogue), and associated a wireless client to it. Sure enough it showed up on the WLC as a rogue AP, but it didn't say that it was connected on the wire. From the rogue client I was able to successfully ping the management interface of the WLC. But the WLC never actually reported the rogue AP as being connected to the wired network.So my questions are:
1. What is the correct configuration for the trunk port? Should it not be configured with a native vlan? If not, then I'm assuming the rogue detector AP will have to have a static IP address defined, and it would have to be told which vlan it's supposed to use to communicate with the WLC.
2. Assuming there is a rogue client associated with the rogue AP, how long should it reasonably take before it is determined that the rogue AP is connected to the wired network? I know this depends on if the rogue client is actually generating traffic, but in my lab environment I had the rogue client pinging the management interface of the WLC and still wasn't being picked up as an on-the-wire rogue.
I've recently set up a PC-based IP PBX in our small business which uses a SIP Trunk for up to 3 simultaneous voice calls. Ports needed to operate include 5060 (SIP-UDP) and then a huge range of high-number UDP ports which I believe is for the 'media' or audio. Let's call the range UDP 49,152 to 64,512. I only know a little about the SIP protocol but my understanding is that each call will randomly use a few ports from this range across which will pass audio, Is there a need to have such a wide range of ports open? If my SIP trunk is only capable of 3 simultaneous calls then it seems only 9 or so of those open ports could get used at once. Could I not just open, say a range of 100 ports and be fine, thereby reducing the security risk?
can i have 4 links from an ESX server to 6500 , each link represents a trunk link carries each the same 2 VLAN , 100 and 101 , keep port-channel out of the picture , does it work well?
We have 7 3560's in 7 different locations connected to our providor for wan access. Our provider has given us a copper cable at each point and we have connected it directly to our 3560 switch at each location. Each port is configured the same way at each location. Each switch is running eigrp.All of the switch ports on each switch are configured as a trunk and vlan 299 had the ip address for the eigrp connection: [code] This setup is working as each switch see's all of the other switches as an eigrp neighbor. We have also made sure that the switch at our head office has spanning tree priority for vlan 299.
So the problem is, if there is a change in the topology at one of the locations it usually causes one or more of the other connections to go down for some reason. We just cannot pinpoint what is causing this change. There are no log's or anything other than an eigrp hold time expired message.?
I have a pair of 3560's configured with dot1q trunks between them carrying a number of VLANs.
Once deployed there will be a requirement for these physical trunks to be disconnected from time to time. Knowing that this is inevitable I am trying to minimise the period of time for the trunks to recover once the physical connectivity is reinstated.
All of the VLANs on the switches are configured for Spanning Tree Rapid PVST. Current time for the trunks/VLANs to come up is around the 4 second mark.
Is it possible to rate limit on a L2 trunk port on a 3750?
current port config and ios are as follows;
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/50 description *** Connection to Fiber Link *** switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,172 switchport mode trunk end flash:c3750-advipservicesk9-mz.122-46.SE.bin
i was wondering if the "srr-queue bandwidth limit 10" command would work to limit the output from this interface to be 10 % of the port bandwidth and then the same command could be done on the other side.
we recently aquired a managed services job and have to do a overhaul of the vlan configs and have a whole dozen WC2948G's trunk between a set of ports as well as trunk out a LAG channel setup to non cisco equipment. the deal is the lacp-channel works properly on both ends but no routing of vlans between ports and between the lag trunk are working.
theres alot of settings in the config and im planning on clearing it and starting from scratch but before i do i want to know where my problem lies.
trunk port connecting but not allowing access to tree; i connected 4506 port to 3550 port; and i set both to switchport mode dynamic desirable; the 4506 port was set with switchport mode access and switchport mode access vlan ?; i used the command default switchport access vlan to remove the vlan; the ports are up but as I stated I cannot connect ot our workgroup tree
