Cisco WAN :: 2911 512Mb DRAM BGP Full Table Packet Loss?

Jan 26, 2013

I have recently installed a Cisco 2911 ISR G2 with the default 512 Mb DRAM intending to eBGP peer. I ordered the 2GB upgrade RAM however due to time constraints on backordered parts, I fired up this router and eBGP peered without it. The Peer advertised the whole route table with 400,000+ routes. The BGP session came up then the router crashed due to not enough memory. The router disabled IP CEF due to insufficient memory. I disabled IP CEF permanently and have been running the router in this condition for 3-weeks with a stable eBGP session. This resulted in no CEF, 25% CPU during light traffic, 89% memory, and 50% CPU when traffic is around 30 Mbps through the router.
 
I am experiencing a hit to the throughput resulting in a lost packet and practically a brief traffic stall roughly every minute. This hit is so quick that it does not always result in packet loss and IP traffic sessions are not reset. I do see this on my live bandwidth graphs that the traffic takes a dive every so often, roughly 1-minute.
 
I initially thought this problem could be L2 to the upstream eBGP peer but all interfaces are clear of errors. I also thought this could be the BGP session going down, however, It is always up. I thought this could be duplex mismatch on L2, however its solid and no logs on either end. Funny thing is pinging thr router from both the LAN side and the WAN side results in the same packet lost every minute or so.
 
Even though the CPU and memory always stays the same at under 20-50% CPU and less than 89% memory, do you think this could be the BGP Scanner walking the routing table every minute?

View 6 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco WAN :: 7204 - Small Packet Size And Full BGP Table

Feb 7, 2012

I'm looking for a Cisco device to run a full BGP table with a 60Mb link. And one of the main restrictions is that my traffic is almost 100% real-time (voip). So the average packet size is small. Today we own a Cisco 7204 NPE400 with 512Mb RAM. I think even though I upgrade it to a G2, due to the small average packet size, the router will be near to its limit. Maybe a Cisco 7300 NSE-150? Or should I think about a switch?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2811 / Upgrade DRAM Of 256MB To 512MB To Support 15.1 IOS Image?

Dec 12, 2012

I want to upgrade my DRAM of 256MB to 512MB to support 15.1 IOS image.Can I buy Cisco approved DRAM from third party Like [URL]

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: WS-SUP720-3B - 2 Full BGP Table - Maximum Routing Table?

Jan 16, 2013

In datasheet of  WS-SUP720-3B - link- was said that are only supported around 256K routes (fib?rib?).With this value I can't get 2 full bgp - that is around 850K ..
 
The supervisor is that control this or just memory ? I said this because I have a 7204-npe-g1 whith 2 fullrouting and 1G of and he are ok..

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Full BGP Table With 6500

Feb 19, 2013

My comany is planning get full bgp table from our providers we have mutliple egress providers in order to load balance we are looking for a full table from all of them what would be minumu requiremts we have all edges as 6500 with sup 720 ,is there any memory requrements that need to be upgraded ??

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: ASR1002 With Full Bgp Table(s)

Jun 19, 2011

I've inherited a project building an internet connectivity solution for a large corporate. It has its own AS and its own PI space. They are putting in 100Mbit connections from 5 different Tier1's , taking full internet routing from each. Cisco ASR1002's have already been specified and purchased for the job. I'm not familiar with the ASR platform at all - is it up to the job with full routing tables? multiple instances of full tables ? (not likely to put all 5 into one box!)

View 2 Replies View Related

TP-Link ADSL2+ Wireless :: W8961ND - DHCP Table Is Full

Nov 15, 2012

Region : Thailand
Model : TD-W8961ND
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version : 2.0.0 Build 111111 Rel.1111
ISP : 3bb

I have a problem when I am trying to add another static ip address to the list

the message above in title pop up, how can I fix it?

DHCP Table is Full!

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 6509 Filtering Out Default Route From Full Internet Routing Table

Sep 12, 2011

I have a question about filtering incoming bgp route updates from an internet provider. This provider sends the full internet routing table and default route and on an incoming prefix-filter on the customer switch (C6509-sup720) the default route is only accepted.What happens on the 6509 switch when the BGP peer flaps?Does it need to process all the internet routing updates, and if yes probably it cannot handle all these updates?What happens with the CEF table, will the switch install the routes first?

View 4 Replies View Related

TCP First Packet Loss?

Dec 12, 2012

i am implementing tcp as per rfc 793, i have one doubt, while sending first packet, if that packet lost means, tcp will wait for RTO and retransmit the first packet, and after got the ack for first packet, then only it will send second packet or without getting the ack for the first packet it will send second packet.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Packet Loss Only Across The VPN?

Apr 18, 2012

My workplace has a UC-540 attached to a cable modem, attached to the world wide web.

When we make VOIP outbound calls through the standard ISP, there is no auditory packet loss sympton; however, when we make calls to out sister branch through our VPN, we experience auditory packet loss symptoms.

I would think the VPN should only be affecting the encapsulation of the data. To my understanding the VPN packets and non-vpn packets all hit the router at the same time, and transport over the web in the same manner. Why would there be packet loss over only the VPN??

--Regarding QoS, if a standard layer 3 device receives a VOIP packet encapsulated in a VPN, do the QoS bits in the VOIP packet get acknowledged, or are they hidden by the VPN encapsulation?

View 8 Replies View Related

Broadband :: Packet Loss Between 58 And 98%?

Mar 29, 2012

My ping is 35ms my DLS at 45.6 Mbps and my Upload is 4.51 Mbps. My Problem is that i am losing about 60 to 90 percent of the packets on a pingtest.net.

View 1 Replies View Related

Outbound Packet Loss

Aug 10, 2011

For about the past 2 or 3 months, I have been experiencing outbound packet loss at about the same time every evening. That timeframe is about 7 PM - 10 PM. This is most noticeable on Teamspeak 3 because of the voice disruption that other users report to me.

View 1 Replies View Related

Random Packet Loss 100%?

Feb 19, 2013

I have recently switch internet to Time Warner. Since the day I got it, i have experienced random packet losses of 100%. I have called time warner and they are going to send a tech out. But i would like to know more about this before he comes. I have replaced the modem with a brand new one. Surfboard SB5101N from the one i was leasing from them. They both do the same thing. I have made sure all my Drivers are up to date. I have replaced the coax cable and Ethernet cable and ran my Anti Virus and Spyware program. It does it more during online game, I have reinstalled the game and was having no problems with the ATT Dsl i had before this.

View 14 Replies View Related

Packet Loss During Same Time Every Day

Dec 13, 2012

I'm having an issue with packet loss during the same time every day at 12:20PM. I checked scheduled tasks, ran wireshark, made a static ARP entry, and ran ping tests. The ping tests show packet loss only when pinging 1 DB server to 1 App server. When the packet loss happens everyone on the network connected to the DB gets kicked out of the DB. They are eventually able to reconnect but its annoying that everyday at 12:20pm they get kicked out. Ping tests from the DB to the Firewall stay constant. But when I ping from the App server to the DB it loses connection at 12:20pm and when i'm remoted into the DB server i get kicked out as well. It's like at 12:20pm the DB server stops incoming connections for some reason.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Packet Loss Due To Ping Priority

Feb 12, 2013

When I ping my video streaming host's IP address (the IP that they gave me where I can view my IP web camera's video stream), I get anywhere from 0% to 8% packet loss at various times of the day. They're claiming that there's no problem, that this is because this is a router and it's dropping ping packets due to "ping priority giving preference to more important network traffic."

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Packet Loss In Side Interface?

Oct 27, 2011

I had all kinds of packet loss and I was ofcourse suspecting my ISP. But then I tested pinging my internal interface and found that it has packet loss as well. I have about 10% packetloss to my interface with 192.168.0.254, I have the same thing from several different inside hosts. My inside rule is the implicit one, any, any. service IP.In the log I can see a teardown and build of the icmp whenever the packet loss accour.There is no packet loss pinging the outside interface from the internet.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Nexus 7K Ping Packet Loss

Nov 21, 2011

I am pinging a host from Nexus 7K.  I'm losing every 200th packet when I'm pinging the end host.   I don't see any issue with network connection.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Application :: CSM Packet Loss WS-X6066

Jun 28, 2011

I´m having a problem/issue with my CSM. I have a WS-X6066-SLB-APC - Version 4.2(1), installed on a 6500, and for a while now whenever I ping the VIPs (vservers) I detect some packet loss (In 10.000 ping packets, I loose around 1%), and higher response times; If I ping the reals I see no issues, only with the L3 behind the CSM.

View 11 Replies View Related

Internet Is Very Slow - Packet Loss Is 100%

Mar 3, 2011

3 days ago it worked just fine but not anymore I've run a packet loss test and the result is 100% loss. I don't know why. The internet is really slow, it is unusual. I'm using wireless network. Oh, I'm using windows XP SP3 (laptop) I am not really good at computer and I'm wondering if this problem is caused by virus, malware of something like that.

View 10 Replies View Related

60-90% Packet Loss On Windows 7 Desktop?

Apr 5, 2012

I have a Windows 7 desktop (so it's NOT wireless) that is having problems with packet loss. Now, the modem is fine, I've tested 'pingtest' on some laptops and the packet loss is very minimal. I've tried reinstalling the drivers for the LAN controller, using a different ethernet cable, using the 'winsock' reset command, and I have no luck. This does effect upload times on YouTube, to where a minute long video takes an hour.

View 14 Replies View Related

Packet Loss / Internet Lag With Data

Dec 15, 2011

I started using Windows 7, on two different computers. I get pretty bad lag spikes while using Skype and playing online games. They occur about once per minute and last maybe one second. There is a "Network Throttling" fix floating around the internet which I have tried, to no avail. I don't know much more about computers than a basic understanding, and am completely new to Win7.

View 14 Replies View Related

Ping Test - 100% Packet Loss?

Nov 17, 2012

Pinging 98.137.149.56 and had 100% packet loss; this was suggested in another thread. LAN connected at 100 Mbps BUT cannot access Internet! Windows XP HP desktop; Belkin N Router; Optimum Cablevision - Modem Scientic Atlanta "Webstar"

I am using my iPhone to access Internet.

View 10 Replies View Related

Tandberg 6000mxp Packet Loss

Mar 2, 2011

We have a tandberg 6000mxp on a network without QoS. We see packet loss on the tandberg counters and NOT on the network anywhere. A network trace also showed no errors.

View 1 Replies View Related

Packet Loss On Shooting Games But Not WoW

Jan 25, 2013

But I have finally diagnosed the problem. When I try to play games like Combat Arms, Arma II /OA, BF3 and run a ping test on pingtest.net my ping is steady, and my jitter is fine but the packet loss is ridiculous! I will have a packet loss of 90-100% causing the game to be unplayable. But when I run this test playing WoW I have 0% packet loss, steady ping, and good jitter. I am completely lost on what to do, other than contact my useless ISP that will not know what to do. I am really frustrated by this and am not sure what the cause of this is or what to do. I have been researching for over a week and have no where else to turn.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Nexus 4 - Ping Gateway IP / Getting Packet Loss

Nov 2, 2011

In my network i have Cisco nexus 4 switches those are running as redundancy and fault tolerance. I have mulitple VRF instances are running, when i tried to ping the gateway IP (hsrp Virtual IP) witch same VRF instance it is getting packet loss.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W Packet Loss Over Wireless?

Sep 16, 2011

I am having issues where different laptops are dropping packets when communicating to the WAP on the RV220W. I have placed 3 laptops directly next to the router so there is no chance for walls to interfere. From each machine 1 at a time I perform a continuous ping. Here is a quick output from one of them:
 
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=64

[Code].....

View 14 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3825 - Packet Loss On Ethernet P2p Link

May 7, 2013

I have two routers, Cisco 3825 and 2811 connected via a p2p ethernet link. The two sides of the links have Huawei muxes with 100/ full duplex set on their interface. I am facing almost 40% packet loss but the supplier is unable to identify any issues at their end. We have tried setting different combinations of duplex and speed settings but no improvement. When set to auto/auto the interfaces are negotiating to half duplex and I am sure this is the cause of the packet loss. Also I heard of auto-negotiation on MUX ports but supplier confirmed no such settings but only 100 Full duplex. If the router iterface is negotiating to half duplex so I suppose there is some thing with the negotition problem with MUX and router port ?    
 
On C3825 I have a Gig interface whileas C2811 has fastEthernet. I guess Gig interface should not negotiate ? Is there a way to pin point the exact fault to supplier ? Also is there work around for this?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: External Packet Loss From LAN Clients Through 857w

Jun 15, 2011

Internet usage is very slow when initially opening a site from LAN clients. Once  established it is OK.  If I ping a site from an LAN client by either host name or IP  address it takes about 5 seconds, drops the first packet then is fine  after that.  if I ping it again immediately  afterwards it is fine.  But if i wait 2 minutes and try again the problem returns.  So I would conclude that seeing it is the same  whether I use Host name or IP address it is not a DNS issue. Pinging from the router produces no fault at all.  [code] I can ping the router internal and external interface or any internal  ip or hostname from the LAN with no delay or hesitation so it is not  a switch interface or network card problem.Some sort of NAT issue maybe? [Code]

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: ESW-520-24P - VoIP Packet Loss Every 35 Seconds

Apr 14, 2013

We have a customer running a Asterisk based Phone system, using Snom 320 phones and a ESW-520-24P as their switch.
 
Recently we have been confronted with an issue where every 35 seconds their is a very obvious drop of audio for both parties of a call.  We know it is not the phone system as we have run tests directly over the BT copper lines that have no drops what so ever.  Unfrotunately when we introduce the LAN in any way, we get the drops every 35 seconds.
 
We are running the whole solution on 1 vlan, yes I know probably better to use two, but the Cisco cannot automatically detect the Snom 320 phones to swap it to another VLAN, which complicates using a VLAN setup.
 
I really need to work out how to stop these packet drops, but I am new to the world of Cisco and dont really know where to look or what to try.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 1811 / Packet Loss Via DMVPN Tunnel But Not Across WAN

May 12, 2011

Scenario:
 
Central Router (WAN: 1.1.1.1) <--> Internet <--> (WAN: Dynamic IP) Branch RouterTunnel 172.31.254.1/26                                     Tunnel 172.31.254.9/26
 
Central router is a Cisco 1811 running IOS c181x-advipservicesk9-mz.151-4.M.bin.Branch router is a Cisco 1941 running IOS c1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M.bin.
 
When I do a Ping test directly from the branch to central router over the Internet I have no packet loss:
 
branch#ping 1.1.1.1 source GigabitEthernet 0/0 repeat 1000Type escape sequence to abort.Sending 1000, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:Packet sent with a source address of 192.168.0.100!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(...)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Success rate is 100 percent (1000/1000), round-trip min/avg/max = 40/41/60 msbranch#
 
When doing a Ping test over the DMVPN tunnel (which is using the WAN IP as source) I see packetloss.
 
branch#ping 172.31.254.1 source Tunnel 3 repeat 1000Type escape sequence to abort.Sending 1000, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.31.254.1, timeout is 2 seconds:Packet sent with a source address of 172.31.254.9!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!.!.!!!!!!.!!!!!..!!!!!!..!!!!!!!!.!!.!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!.!!!.!!!!!!!!!!!..!!!!.!.!.!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!.!..!!!.!.!!!!!.(...)!!!!!!.!!!.!!!!.!!!!.!.!!.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.!!.!!!!!!!!!.!!!.!!.!.!!!!!...!!!!!!!!!!..!!!!!!Success rate is 79 percent (795/1000), round-trip min/avg/max = 40/43/568 msbranch#
 
Central:

interface Tunnel0 description Testing (DMVPN) bandwidth 10000 ip address 172.31.254.1 255.255.255.192 no ip redirects ip mtu 1400 ip nhrp authentication testing ip nhrp map multicast dynamic ip nhrp network-id 1 ip nhrp holdtime 600 ip nhrp redirect ip tcp adjust-mss 1360 no ip split-horizon eigrp 1 tunnel source FastEthernet1 tunnel mode gre multipoint tunnel key 100003 tunnel bandwidth transmit 10000 tunnel bandwidth receive 10000 tunnel protection ipsec profile secure_profile shared
 
Branch:
 
interface Tunnel3 description Testing (DMVPN) bandwidth 2000 ip address 172.31.254.9 255.255.255.192 no ip redirects ip mtu 1400 ip nhrp authentication testing ip nhrp map multicast 1.1.1.1 ip nhrp map 172.31.254.1 1.1.1.1 ip nhrp network-id 1 ip nhrp holdtime 300 ip nhrp nhs 172.31.254.1 ip nhrp shortcut ip nhrp redirect ip tcp adjust-mss 1360 no ip split-horizon eigrp 1 delay 1000 tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 tunnel mode gre multipoint tunnel key 100003 tunnel bandwidth transmit 2000 tunnel bandwidth receive 2000 tunnel protection ipsec profile secure_profile shared
 
Crypto parameters on both central and branch routers:
 
crypto isakmp policy 1 authentication pre-share
  crypto ipsec transform-set secure_transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac mode transport
  crypto ipsec profile secure_profile set transform-set secure_transform-set
 
I disabled CEF on both the central and branch routers and no success.  The EIGRP neighborship appears to be stable.

View 4 Replies View Related

Broadband :: Local Network Another Pc Packet Loss?

Mar 18, 2012

my local network another pc packet loss

View 1 Replies View Related

Major Packet Loss When Particular Computer Is Connected

Nov 28, 2012

I've been having an unusual networking issue lately, where everything runs smoothly apart from when one user's laptop is connected to the WLAN. All users on the network get something between 20% and 60% packet loss, only when this user's laptop is connected. I've made sure all the TCP/IP settings are reset to default, I've reset the router to factory settings, but the problem persists. This only came on recently, and I don't believe anything changed.

View 2 Replies View Related

High Ping And Packet Loss In Game?

Nov 3, 2012

I recently moved from an old apartment in Downtown Montreal, to a suburb area, but still close to where I was before (10 km). I am using the same ISP provider, Videotron. The same speed. I was playing games perfectly fine before, but now something is really wrong. Whenever I join a server, my ping skyrockets up to close to 200, sometimes drifting to 130 but never going below... and often rising back up again.Keep in mind that I filter servers by their pings. I only join servers that display a low ping (although often I won't see any, when I refresh.. there they are). I'll see a server with 30 ping, join it, and be at 200. I'm mainly trying to play Chivalry Medieval Warfare.It's entirely unplayable. Not only is it impossible to properly time parries anymore, but I also get a lot of rubberbanding. I've tested the internet here, and the speeds are accurate. 10 mbps down, 1 mbps up. I am connected to a Linksys E1200 router. I've tried everything I can possibly think of.I went into the router setup, disabled the firewall, added myself to a DMZ, tried to forward every port for steam (although it didn't seem to recognize it as a program)... rebooted the modem, my computer, the router, tried a different Ethernet cable.. nothing is working. It's very depressing. Nothing has changed on my own computer in the move.

View 13 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved